DOCSLIB.ORG

Thanet Parkway Station Business Case

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Thanet Parkway Station Business Case GBF Transport Business Case Report Thanet Parkway Station 001 Revision 7 Revision 07 October 2020 Document Control Sheet Project Name: Thanet Parkway Station Report Title: GBF Transport Business Case Report Report Number: 001 Revision 7 Issue Status/ Prepared Reviewed Approved Amendment 0 Name: Name: Name: Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: 02 Name: Name: Name: Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: 03 Name: Name: Name: Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: 04 Name: Name: Name: Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: 05 Name: Name: Name: Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: 06 Name: Name: Name: Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: 07 Name: Name: Name: Signature: Signature: Signature: Date: Date: Date: Project NameThanet Parkway Station Document TitleGBF Transport Business Case Report Contents 1 Introduction .................................................................................................. 5 1.1 Overview .................................................................................................. 5 1.2 Location of the Scheme .............................................................................. 5 1.3 Background to the Business Case ................................................................ 6 1.4 Scheme Development History ..................................................................... 7 1.5 Purpose of this Document ........................................................................ 10 1.6 Structure of the Document ....................................................................... 11 2 Proposed Scheme ........................................................................................ 12 2.1 Proposed Station Facility .......................................................................... 12 2.2 Proposed Timetable ................................................................................. 14 2.3 Passenger Capacity .................................................................................. 16 2.4 Service Costs .......................................................................................... 21 2.5 Impact on Other Passenger Services ......................................................... 21 3 Strategic Case ............................................................................................. 23 3.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 23 3.2 National Transport Priorities ..................................................................... 23 3.3 Regional Transport Priorities ..................................................................... 27 3.4 Local Transport Priorities .......................................................................... 29 3.5 Current Problem ...................................................................................... 35 3.6 Impact of Not Changing ........................................................................... 39 3.7 Internal Drivers for Change ...................................................................... 42 3.8 External Drivers for Change ...................................................................... 43 3.9 Objectives ............................................................................................... 43 3.10 Scope ..................................................................................................... 45 3.11 Constraints ............................................................................................. 46 3.12 Inter-dependencies .................................................................................. 47 3.13 Stakeholders ........................................................................................... 47 3.14 Options ................................................................................................... 49 4 Economic Case ............................................................................................. 53 4.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 53 4.2 Options Appraised ................................................................................... 54 4.3 Value for Money Method .......................................................................... 54 Doc. Ref.:001 Revision 7 Rev. 07 - i - Issued: October 2020 Project NameThanet Parkway Station Document TitleGBF Transport Business Case Report 4.4 Scope for Proportionality in the Assessment ............................................... 57 4.5 Assumptions ........................................................................................... 59 4.6 Initial NPV............................................................................................... 63 4.7 Sensitivity ............................................................................................... 65 4.8 Qualitative Impacts .................................................................................. 66 4.9 Appraisal Summary Table ......................................................................... 70 4.10 Value for Money Statement ...................................................................... 72 5 Financial Case .............................................................................................. 74 5.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 74 5.2 Base Costs .............................................................................................. 75 5.3 Inflation .................................................................................................. 76 5.4 Risk Budget............................................................................................. 76 5.5 Optimism Bias ......................................................................................... 76 5.6 Final Scheme Costs .................................................................................. 77 5.7 Funding Arrangements ............................................................................. 78 5.8 Whole Life Costs ...................................................................................... 81 5.9 Accounting Implications ........................................................................... 83 6 Commercial Case ......................................................................................... 84 6.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 84 6.2 Outcome Based Specification .................................................................... 84 6.3 Procurement Options ............................................................................... 85 6.4 Procurement Strategy .............................................................................. 85 6.5 Payment Mechanisms .............................................................................. 87 6.6 Pricing Framework and Charging Mechanisms ............................................ 88 6.7 Potential for Risk Transfer ........................................................................ 88 6.8 Contract Length....................................................................................... 88 6.9 Contract Management .............................................................................. 89 6.10 Securing Rail Services .............................................................................. 89 7 Management Case ....................................................................................... 91 7.1 Introduction ............................................................................................ 91 7.2 Evidence of Similar Project Delivery........................................................... 91 7.3 Project Programme .................................................................................. 93 7.4 Project Dependencies .............................................................................. 94 7.5 Governance, Organisation Structure, Roles and Assurance .......................... 95 Doc. Ref.:001 Revision 7 Rev. 07 - ii - Issued: October 2020 Project NameThanet Parkway Station Document TitleGBF Transport Business Case Report 7.6 Assurance and Approvals Plan .................................................................. 99 7.7 Availability and Suitability of Resources ..................................................... 99 7.8 Communications and Stakeholder Management Plan................................. 100 7.9 Risk Management .................................................................................. 107 7.10 Scheme Risks ........................................................................................ 108 7.11 Monitoring and Evaluation ...................................................................... 111 7.12 Benefits Realisation Plan ........................................................................ 111 Appendix A Scheme Proposal Plans A Appendix B Full Business Case Economics TN01 November 2019 - v2 B Appendix C Economic Appraisal Calculation Spreadsheets C Appendix D Letters of Support D Appendix E (E1) Thanet Parkway Options Analysis and (E2) Thanet Parkway Sites Appraisal E Appendix F Scheme Cost Estimate F Appendix G Quantified Risk Assessment G Appendix H Project Programme H Appendix I Project Governance Plan I Appendix J Stakeholder Management Plan J Appendix K Thanet District Transport Strategy Infrastructure
Load more

Recommended publications
  • (Public Pack)Agenda Document for Planning Applications Committee, 02/09/2020 10:00
    PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Wednesday, 2nd September, 2020 10.00 am Online AGENDA PLANNING APPLICATIONS COMMITTEE Wednesday, 2nd September, 2020, at 10.00 Ask for: Andrew Tait am Online Telephone: 03000 416749 Membership (13) Conservative (10): Mr R A Marsh (Chairman), Mr R A Pascoe (Vice-Chairman), Mr M A C Balfour, Mrs R Binks, Mr A Booth, Mr A H T Bowles, Mr P C Cooper, Mr H Rayner, Mr C Simkins and Mr J Wright Liberal Democrat (1): Mr I S Chittenden Labour (1) Mr J Burden Independents (1) Mr P M Harman UNRESTRICTED ITEMS (During these items the meeting is likely to be open to the public A. COMMITTEE BUSINESS 1. Substitutes 2. Declarations of Interests by Members in items on the Agenda for this meeting. 3. Minutes - 15 July (Pages 1 - 6) 4. Site Meetings and Other Meetings B. GENERAL MATTERS 1. General Matters C. MINERALS AND WASTE DISPOSAL APPLICATIONS D. DEVELOPMENTS TO BE CARRIED OUT BY THE COUNTY COUNCIL 1. Proposal TH/19/1696 (KCC/TH/0256/2019) -Construction of a new railway station consisting of two platforms connected via an existing underpass (to be refurbished) with stair and lift access and associated infrastructure including vehicle and cycle parking, public announcement system, drainage, security and lighting, landscaping, level crossing upgrade works, and vehicle, pedestrian and cycle access including the creation of a vehicle access onto the A299 Hengist Way with associated highway works and a footway/cycle link to Clive Road at Land to the north and south of the A299 (Hengist Way) and to the east of the A256 (Richborough Way) including an existing railway line and part of the A299, Cliffsend (Thanet Parkway Station); KCC Growth, Environment and Transport (Pages 7 - 70) E.
    [Show full text]
  • 1891 Census of Thanet Places As Enumerated, with Index
    1891 Census of Thanet Places as Enumerated, with Index Scope The full Registration District, piece RG12/725 to piece RG12/733 inclusive. Arrangement A summary of the places-related information recorded in the enumerators’ returns of households, in ‘as enumerated’ order, including all Thanet’s public houses and farm houses (although some of these are not explicitly identified in the original). Each entry includes : • piece and folio numbers : used with the PRO class (RG12) to locate the original • Dwelling : name of one or more dwellings ~ 'Rows' and 'Terraces' are usually under this heading, although some may have been considered 'streets' and their names used as street names • Street : names of a street, road, etc, and some hamlets ~ 'Places' are usually under this heading, although some may have been sub-divisions of a street • parish : the ecclesiastical parish, abbreviated as noted below • locality : the key guide to location, used to differentiate common street names in the Index There is a combined Index for Dwellings and Streets starting on page 56, each entry giving a piece and folio number(s). Abbreviations & Notations [ ] square brackets enclose annotation { } where a place-name spelling may be incorrect, the accepted version is given and the original enclosed in curly brackets ~ usually both are indexed *** unoccupied/being built, usually only noted if the name of a dwelling or street would otherwise be omitted aS All Saints, Birchington cC Christ Church, Ramsgate hT Holy Trinity, Broadstairs hTm Holy Trinity, Margate hTr Holy
    [Show full text]
  • Erection of 1No 4 Bedroom Detached Dwelling 40 Canterbury Road West
    A08 F/TH/18/0338 PROPOSAL: Erection of 1No 4 bedroom detached dwelling LOCATION: 40 Canterbury Road West RAMSGATE Kent CT12 5DU WARD: Cliffsend And Pegwell AGENT: Mr Tony Michael APPLICANT: J A Squires Construction Ltd RECOMMENDATION: Approve Subject to the following conditions: 1 The development hereby permitted shall be begun before the expiration of three years from the date of this permission. GROUND In accordance with Section 91 of the Town and Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended by Section 51 of the Planning and Purchase Act 2004) 2 The proposed development shall be carried out in accordance with the submitted application as amended by the revised drawings numbered: 001 (received 08/03/18) 002A (received 24/05/18) 003 (received 08/03/18) 004B (received 24/05/18) 008B (received 24/05/18) GROUND: To secure the proper development of the area. 3 Prior to the first occupation of the dwelling hereby approved pedestrian visibility splays of 2metres by 2metres behind the footway on both sides of the dwelling access with no obstructions over 0.6m above footway level shall be provided and thereafter maintained. GROUND: In the interest of highway safety. 4 The development hereby approved shall incorporate a bound surface materials for the first 5 metres of the access from the edge of the highway. GROUND: In the interests of highway safety. 5 No development shall take place on any external surface of the development hereby permitted until details of the type, colour and texture of all materials to be used for the external surfaces of the dwelling have been submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority.
    [Show full text]
  • SLIPPING AWAY DOVER's HISTORIC a Disappearing World MAISON DIEU See Page 46 and the Pubs of Ladywell
    Issue 46 Winter 2010/11 INSIDE SLIPPING AWAY DOVER'S HISTORIC A Disappearing World MAISON DIEU See Page 46 and the Pubs of Ladywell See Page 42 Getting to Know THE ABIGALE BREWERY Ashford's new brewers See Page 44 Channel Draught is published and ISSUE 46 ©2011 by the Deal Dover Winter 2010/11 Sandwich & District Branch of the elcome to 2011 and the latest issue of Channel Campaign for Real Ale W Draught - and one not without a note of sadness, www.camra-dds.org.uk as we report the deaths of Daphne Fagg, long serving landlady of the Carpenters Arms, Coldred; and of former Editorial Team Branch Member and Beery Boater, Phil Simpson. Editor & If you don't recognise the photograph on the front cover Advertising it's not because it's a little known local gem you have yet Martin Atkins to become acquainted with, but because it is in fact, a Editorial Assistants unique Worcestershire cider house. Known, for what­ Trisha Wells ever obscure reason, as the Monkey House, Roger John Pitcher Marples visited it recently and describes it in greater Design & Format detail elsewhere (see 2010 Divisional Trip). He also Steve Bell points out, that quite likely it will not to be there for much longer - a survivor from another age, whose life has perhaps finally run its course. For some two hundred Editorial Address years it happily supplied a needed community service, You can write to the without feeling any necessity to pursue wealth and ce­ lebrity, or promote and replicate itself all over the coun­ Editor c/o try.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Friendly Village Newsletter Issue Number 90 : March 2008 ISSN 1755-9502 (Print) : ISSN 1755-9510 (Online)
    Your Friendly Village Newsletter Issue Number 90 : March 2008 ISSN 1755-9502 (Print) : ISSN 1755-9510 (Online) The Salon will be closed for a few days after the party, for refurbishment. Leanne assures us that the atmosphere and prices will remain the same, but wants to give the premises a bit of a facelift. All current and new customers will be made most welcome. We wish them both well in their new ventures. Logo designed by Michaela Hockley LINDSAY IS HANDING THE KEYS TO LEANNE Lindsay’s first premises in Monkton Road Lindsay would like all her customers to know that she will be retiring in April and that Leanne will be taking over the business. Lindsay who trained to be a hairdresser in Deal, moved to Minster in 1967 when she got married. She styled hair at Hill House hospital and was also a mobile hairdresser in the early years, whilst she had two young sons to care for. She started working at Win’s in 1977 and eventually in 1983 opened her own Salon in Monkton Road, moving to her present premises in High Street some six years later. Over the years she has seen plenty of customers come and go, and she has one client, who we are told, has been coming to her for 38 years. Minster Carnival Court 2008 Lindsay has regularly supported such charities as Macmillan Princess Libby Alexander, Miss Minster Emily Pepin and Princess Letitia Graham Nursing, the MS Society and more recently the village Christmas Lights Appeal. She has also been responsible for Emily was crowned Miss Minster at the Village Hall on the the hair styling of Miss Minster and her Princesses for a 16th February.
    [Show full text]
  • 1901 Census of Thanet Places Enumerated, with Index
    1901 Census of Thanet Places Enumerated, with Index Scope The complete Thanet Registration District, enumerated on the following pieces : • RG13/819 Acol, Birchington, Minster, Monkton, Sarre, St Nicolas, Stonar • RG13/820 Margate, Westgate • RG13/821 Margate • RG13/822 Margate • RG13/823 Margate • RG13/824 Margate • RG13/825 Ramsgate • RG13/826 Ramsgate • RG13/827 St Lawrence • RG13/828 Broadstairs, St Lawrence, St Peter • RG13/829 St Lawrence, St Peter This is a finding aid, and punctuation, capitalisation and spelling may have been changed. Arrangement The first part is in sections, each corresponding to an Enumeration District. The entries in each section give the place-related information for the district, arranged in columns : • piece & folio : used with the class number (RG13) to identify the original source • Dwellings and Buildings : names or descriptions of individual dwellings and buildings ~ also includes groups such as ‘cottages’ & ‘almshouses’ • Streets, Hamlets, etc : names used for groups of dwellings & buildings ~ as well as streets and hamlets, also includes places such as ‘courts’, ‘gardens’, ‘terraces’, ‘yards’, etc • parish : the ecclesiastical parish or district, abbreviated as noted below • location : the town or civil parish. In a some cases the information under this heading may be the only place-related data given in the original, and nothing is entered under ‘Dwellings’ or ‘Streets’ The second part (starting on page 75) is a combined Index of Dwellings and Streets, each entry giving piece and folio number(s).
    [Show full text]
  • LSER Service Level Commitment 3
    Public Register Version INTEGRATED KENT Franchise Direct Award SERVICE LEVEL COMMITMENT 3 (‘SLC3’) 11 January 2015 to 29 August 2016 VERSION 3.2 11.8.14 1 | P a g e Public Register Version APPENDIX 1 TO SCHEDULE 1.1 Part 1 Service Level Commitment – General Provisions 1. CONSTRUCTION The following provisions of this Part 1 to this Appendix 1 shall apply in respect of the Service Level Commitment set out in Part 2 to this Appendix 1. 2. DAYS AND TIMES OF DAY 2.1 Except to the extent the context otherwise requires, references to a day mean the period commencing at 0200 on one day and ending at 0159 on the following day and references to Weekdays and particular days of the week shall be construed accordingly. 2.2 References to periods of times and periods of days include the times and days such periods start and finish. 2.3 All references to time are to the twenty-four hour clock. 3. SERVICES 3.1 Except where expressly indicated to the contrary, references to services, all services or any part or any proportion of services are to be construed as references to the Passenger Services (or the relevant part or proportion thereof) required to be included by the Franchisee in its Timetable pursuant to paragraph 8.2 of Schedule 1.1 of the Franchise Agreement and do not include such additional railway passenger services as the Franchisee may be permitted to provide from time to time under this Agreement. 3.2 Except where expressly indicated to the contrary, where an interval or frequency is specified for a service, such specification shall apply at the departure point for the relevant service.
    [Show full text]
  • The Geology of Pegwell
    The Geology of Pegwell Bay by Peter Golding In the past few years, clearance work has taken place to re-expose part of the classic coastal cliffs in Pegwell Bay, southwest of Ramsgate on the Isle of Thanet in Kent. The work, initiated by English Nature under their Face Lift programme, was organised by Thanet Council and used a local contractor. Kent RIGS Group also pro- vided assistance and is now regularly maintaining the cleared sections. Interest is focused on three aspects of the degraded cliffs: 1. 0.9km stretch of Palaeocene sediments with overlying Pleistocene brickearth in cliffs below the car park at TR 350642 2. Palaeocene-Cretaceous unconformity at Redcliff Point, TR 354644 3. The adjacent Pleistocene filled channel. Pegwell Bay has a long history of accretion and cliff abandonment. Whitaker (1872) refers to the Palaeocene cliffs as “much overgrown and hidden by fallen earth”. Rapid growth of scrub followed construction of the Hover- port in the 1970s and part of the section was permanently lost under the access road. In contrast, Redcliff Point was actively eroded at this time and the section there was “probably better exposed than for some time previous- ly” (Ward 1977). However, silting returned and the unconformity and filled channel at Redcliff Point were almost totally obscured until the cleaning of February 2005. Phase 1 in the winter of 2002/2003 saw the removal of scrub and talus from three 30metre sections below the car park. These reveal at the top of the cliff up to 4 metres of brickearth (loess) which stands in a typically vertical face with rough prismatic jointing.
    [Show full text]
  • Your Friendly Village Newsletter
    Your Friendly Village Newsletter Issue Number 94 : July 2008 ISSN 1755-9502 (Print) : ISSN 1755-9510 (Online) MINSTER FLOWER SHOW Saturday 19th July Recreation Ground This year marks the staging of the 122nd Logo designed by Michaela Hockley Annual Flower Show in the village and the Committee are pleased to announce that they have ABBEY PLANNING APPLICATION been able to acquire the services of Ben Mills, of (Parkminster - Former Museum Site) X-Factor fame, to ‘do the honours’ and officially We were requested by the Abbey Trustees not to open the show at 2.00pm. add an editorial comment, to the notice we Apart from the usual offerings of exhibits and published for them last month, regarding the competitions in the granting of the change of use of the former Museum Barn and surrounding area. marquee, you will However, since then, the following has come to also be entertained by our notice, and we feel it is our duty to report that both a “Baby Show” the Thanet District Council Planning Committee and a “Dog Show” has applied the following conditions to that alongside of which application: there will be a variety “No use other than non-residential of races for children hospitality use, as specified by information and adults alike and submitted by the applicant on 12 March 2008 Minster Mayhems entitled 'Hospitality at Minster Abbey', shall be will be there complete carried on at the site, and the approved use shall with their Maypole. be carried on only by Mother Nikola Kroksch, A skateboard competition for the 8 to 18 yr olds Sister Benedict Gaughan, Sister Aelred Erwin is being staged at the skate-park area plus for and Sister Johanna Caton (hereinafter referred everyone’s enjoyment you can look forward to a to as the Trustees of Minster Abbey) and by no good variety of stalls, a fun fair and a music other person or persons.
    [Show full text]
  • Expression of Opposition to Riveroak Strategic Partnership's DCO David
    Expression of Opposition to RiverOak Strategic Partnership’s DCO David Drozdowski, Margate Resident I put it to the UK government that it is not romantic, subjective, theoretical ideas about how “This time, Manston Airport can make it” that should be considered but common sense, face value- based observations. In light of Manston Airports past failures, RSP’s lack of corroboration of their lofty predictions or even experience, and Thanet District Council’s economic and environmental records, it seems obvious that the MOST needed and viable proposal is not RiverOak Strategic Partnership. If somebody prefers RiverOak Strategic Partnership’s proposal, confirmation bias can then find them ways in which a new airport plan is not completely absurd or entirely unsustainable. It’s not that it’s an irrelevant or irrational proposal. The issue, however, is that there are many ways in which the RSP DCO is an inferior proposal for Thanet economically, environmentally, or ethically. 1. Economically and Environmentally Inferior Even a successful airport would bring in some business and tax revenue as well as long-term jobs to Thanet, but what would bring far more income into Thanet is 3000+ homes, each household having a VERY conservative average £20,000 or more annual income, which would bring a £60,000,000+ influx of annual income to Thanet (more likely £100,000,000 or more) from wherever people move and to wherever they commute for business and employment. This would naturally create more businesses and jobs in Thanet, not to mention the thousands of houses’ council tax revenue to TDC, meaning RiverOak Strategic Partnership simply has an inferior proposal economically.
    [Show full text]
  • For Sale Ramsgate, Kent CT12 5JB
    PUBLIC HOUSE WITH DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL FOR A VARIETY OF USES SUBJECT TO PLANNING OFFERS INVITED ON AN UNCONDITIONAL BASIS The Sportsman Guide Price: £250,000 + VAT Sandwich Road Cliffsend For Sale Ramsgate, Kent CT12 5JB Location The Sportsman is situated on the coastal road between Ramsgate and Sandwich overlooking Pegwell Bay. The property is close to Pegwell Bay Country Park and Sandwich and Pegwell Bay National Nature Reserve. The world famous Princes and Royal St George’s Gold Clubs are close by and the property overlooks Stonelees pay and play golf course to the rear. The A256 is a short distance from the property and connects the A299 Thanet Way with the A2/M2. The mainline station at Ramsgate has direct connections to St Pancras International in under 1 hour 20 minutes and from Sandwich station in just over 1 hour 30 minutes. There is a good range of local schools with grammar schools in Sandwich, Ramsgate and Broadstairs. Westwood Shopping Centre is a short distance to the north. Description The Sportsman is a detached public house with the original part of the building reputedly dating from 1750. The property has been extensively altered and extended with brick extensions under a pitched slate roof. The function room has a lean to single slope roof of sheet material. The main building is arranged over three levels with trade areas on the ground floor, extensive basement cellarage and a good sized licensee’s flat on the first floor. Outside there is a garden and car park and the site extends to approximately 0.4 acres.
    [Show full text]
  • Route Number Pick up Point Postcode Time
    Route Number Pick up Point Postcode Time DEAL - Bus stop to Queens Street by ocean room CT14 6EY 4:00pm DOVER - Bus Stop on Town Wall Street Dover by Premier Inn Dover Central. CT16 1LL 4:30pm Route 1 CANTERBURY - Victoria Hotel. London Road by the Roundabout (On A2050 facing into CT2 8JY Canterbury) 5:30pm ME13 FAVERSHAM - bus stop by Faversham FC 8NG 5:45pm SHEERNESS - Tesco next to Sheppey College ME12 1HL 4.30pm ME10 SITTINGBORUNE - Railway Station 3ED 4.45pm RAINHAM - High Street lay-by outside Lukehurst’s Store ME8 7JJ 5.00pm Route 2 GILLINGHAM - Bus Station, Nelson Road ME7 4LN 5.15pm CHATHAM - Railway Station ME4 6PS 5.30pm STROOD - B&Q/Matalan bus stop, Commercial Road ME2 2AB 5.45pm GRAVESEND - bus stop by old A2 Tollgate underpass DA11 8AB 6.00pm BEXHILL - Town Hall Square TN39 3JR 4.10pm HASTINGS - Harold Place (West side) TN34 1JB 4.30pm ORE - Millers Arms TN35 4JU 4.40pm TN33 Route 3 BATTLE - Battle Abbey 0WL 4.55pm HURST GREEN - Opposite the George Pub TN19 7HJ 5.05pm FLIMWELL TN5 7PJ 5.15pm PEMBURY - Camden Arms Pub TN2 4DY 5.30pm RAMSGATE - Railway Station CT11 7RE 4.40pm MARGATE - Railway Station CT9 5AD 4.55pm Route 4 BIRCHINGTON - Town Square CT7 9AE 5.20pm HERNE BAY - East Kent Garage, High Street CT6 5TS 5.25pm WHITSTABLE - Reeves Way (rear of B & Q) CT5 3QZ 5.35pm Folkstone - Bus Stop near bus stop, opposite saga building CT20 1AZ 3:50pm HYTHE - Red Lion Square CT21 6LB 4:15pm Route 5 DYMCHURCH - High Street main bus stop TN29 0NL 4:30pm NEW ROMNEY - Ship Hotel, High Street TN28 8AZ 4:45pm ASHFORD - bus stop – Warren
    [Show full text]