ACMS Team Physician CourseSan AntonioFeb 2015 FOOT AND ANKLE PROBLEMS IN ATHLETES
Marlene DeMaio, MD Prof, Orthopaedic Surgery, Marshall University; VAMC John J. Jasko, MD Asst Prof, Orthopaedic Surgery, Marshall University
ANKLE ANATOMY
Seto, Foot and Ankle Anatomy, Slideshare Syndesmosis
• Syndesmosis: – Ant. Inf. Tibiofibular ligament – Post. Inf. Tibiofibular ligament – Transverse biofibular ligament – Interosseous membrane So Tissue Injuries
• Sprains • Tendon strains and tears
Primemed.com.au ANKLE SPRAINS • 27,000 per day in U.S. – 25% of all MSK injuries
• Most common sports injury – 25-50% of all sports injuries – >50% of all ankle injuries – #1 NCAA surveillance data and ballet, classical dance – 45% of all basketball injuries “It’s just a sprain.” • Not a benign injury – 75% athletes report recurrence – Up to 25% lead to chronic lateral ankle instability and/or pain – Self assessed disability is high – Lost days of work, prac ce, games • 10-15% of all me lost in football • 3-5 weeks lost • Even for lower grade injuries “It’s just a sprain.” • Misdiagnosis, incomplete diagnosis – Bone • Fracture: Ankle, Talus, Maissoneuve, 5th metatarsal • Tarsal coali on – So ssue • Global laxity, Ehlers Danlos • Tendon injury: Peroneals, Achilles – Nerve disorder • HNP, drop foot • Charcot Marie Tooth
DeMaio, Orthopedics 1992:87-96 Anatomy • Ligament = condensa on of • ATF Ligament capsule – Fails at 138N AITF – Can undergo greater CFL ATFL plas c deforma on than CFL • CF Ligament – Cord like – Fails at 345N – Deep to peroneals
Clanton T, et.al. Anatomic study of Lateral Ligaments. – 105° b/t ATFL CFL Poster at AAOS 2014 Anatomy: Lateral Ligament Morphology
LIGAMENT WIDTH, mm LENGTH, mm ORIGIN INSERTION
Anterior Neck of talus ATF 5 12 border lateral malleolus
Fossa lateral Lateral CF 6 6-25 malleolus, tubercle, 10-45 deg calcaneus post angle process Post lat Lateral PTF 6 9 malleolus, post tubercle, talus to CF ligament post process
Hollinshead, Textbook of Anatomy, 3rd ed, 1974: 423-488 Ruth, JBJS-Am, 1961 43: 229-239 Mechanism of Injury: Lateral Ankle Sprains • Weight bearing • Low energy trauma • Example: 230 lb RB, terminal velocity of 22.2 /sec, decelera ng at 13.5 m/sec2 – Force on ankle: 7760N – Stress lateral ankle: 1264.4 lbs
– ATF fails at 138 N, CF at 345N
Guise, AJSM 1976 4: 1-6. Lateral Ankle Sprains • Func on and alignment changes with mo on
PF Neutral DF
• Primary inversion stabilizer – Plantarflexion: ATFL – Dorsiflexion: CFL Mechanism of Injury • Lateral ankle sprain: a cascade of injury – Supina on/Inversion in Plantar-flexion or Neutral
• ATFL injured first (“essen al lesion”) • CFL injured as ankle DF during con nued inversion – ATFL + CFL 30-60% • PFL last to rupture in extreme inversion, DF
Lateral Ankle Sprain: Exam • Anterior drawer – Tests the ATFL – Slight plantarflexion – Translate anterior and slightly medial • Talar lt – Tests CFL – Neutral flexion – Inversion of hindfoot – Look for dimple
• Always compare to other side • Most sensi ve at me 0, then day 7 Lateral Ankle Sprains: Grades Grade Injury Swelling Weight Bearing I ATFL stretch, Mild Mild limp, but tear can WB with brace II ATFL and Moderate Difficult capsular tear + swelling and CFL Bruising
III AFTL, capsule, Severe swelling Unable to bear CFL tears and bruising weight
Note: Grade IV with avulsion fracture Lateral Ankle Sprains
• Classifica on: systems not comparable – AMA : Grades I-IV – Severity – Ligaments • Single: ATF ligament and capsule • Double: ATF and CF ligaments • Triple: ATF, CF, and PTF ligaments Imaging: X-ray Indica ons • O awa Rules • Inability to bear weight AP, lateral, mor se • Bony tenderness
O owa Rules
• Xrays are indicated to r/o fx if: – Presenta on within 10 days of injury – Inability to bear weight at me of injury or at presenta on – Tenderness over then distal 6cm of malleoli, posterior aspect – Tenderness over the base of the 5th metatarsal or navicular
Imaging: MRI Indica ons • If isolated injury, f/u exam in 1-2 weeks • MRI if – Persistent significant swelling – Tenderness: • Peroneals • Lateral talus • Anterior calcaneus – Syndesmosis injury suspected
• R/o concomitant pathology Lateral Ankle Sprains: Treatment • Isolated acute Grade I & II lateral ankle sprains – Universal consensus – Ini al non-opera ve treatment of • Grade III – “Near” consensus – Some new evidence may change this Lateral Ankle Sprains: Treatment
• Benign Neglect – Not appropriate – 75% recurrence rates – RR=2.3 for CAI without func onal rehab Lateral Ankle Sprains: Treatment • RICE: 24-48 hours • Control pain • Limit swelling • Reduce hypoxic injury during acute inflamma on • Protect Ligaments, Stabilize the Joint – Trauma creates temporary instability – True healing takes >8 weeks – External support: Braces, cast, boot, tape • Func onal Rehabilita on – Neuromuscular and sport/task training DeMaio, Orthopedics 1992 15:87-96 and 241-248
Func onal Rehabilita on • A er LAS pa ents exhibit deficits in – Joint posi on sense – Isometric strength in mul ple planes of mo on – Postural control on the involved and uninvolved limb • Posi ve modified Rhomberg – Abnormal EMG (Nitz AJSM 1985 13:177-182) • Peroneal nerve, 86% Grade III • Tibial nerve, 83% Grade III • Lack of neuromuscular retraining leads to recurrent injury, chronic problems – 2.3 x risk of recurrence Func onal Rehab: Components • Early Joint mobiliza on • Strengthening • Sensorimotor/balance – Wobble board – Trampoline • Single/double leg Postural control • Con nue external support • Propriocep ve feedback • Con nued protec on of ligaments Meta-Analyses/Level 1 Evidence • Func onal Rehab > prolonged immobiliza on – Faster return to sport, work – Fewer long term symptoms – Be er ROM • Semi-rigid external support be er than cast & Ace – S rrup ≥ Lace up brace > tape > Elas c wrap – SLC/boot useful in G3 (Lamb et al. Lancet 2009) • Short tem use (days) only Meta-Analyses: Level 1 Evidence
• Petersen et al. Arch Ortho Trauma 2013 • Lamb,et al. Lancet 2009 • Beynnon et al. AJSM 2006 • Ardevol et al. KSSTA 2002 • Kerkhoffs et al. Cochrane 2002 • Kerkhoffs et al. Acta Ortho Scand. 2003 Taping
• Pros • Cons – Custom – Rapid loosening – Provides propriocep ve • A er 10 mins, 40% of strength feedback lost • 50% decrease in ROM a er 2 1/2 – Lightweight, low bulk -3 hrs – May be useful when • 45-60 minutesàminimal effect swelling prevents fi ng – Trained personnel of an orthosis – Expensive over the season – Variable effects on performance DeMaio, Orthopedics 1992 15:87-96
Taping vs. Brace for Sports • Both shown to prevent ankle sprains – Braces overall more effec ve – Braces cost less per season • Much more effec ve on athlete with h/o prior ankle sprain “Marshall” Algorithm • Brace: S rrup/ Lace up /Combo • Boot in G3 – To brace in few days • TED hose • WBAT with crutches if limping – NWB A/PROM • Func onal Rehab Return to Play
• Subjec ve symptoms – Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) • Func onal tests – Star Excursion Balance • Simplfied to Y – Single leg balance – Single leg heel to toe raises • 60/minute Ankle Sprains: Treatment • Func onal rehab be er than immobiliza on – Start with DF, eversion – Ac ve resistance: isometric first • Peroneals • Dorsiflexors • Evertors
• Role for acute surgical interven on in selected cases? Ankle Sprains: Treatment
• Pinjenburg, et al. 2002 – RPT Level II – Acute repair vs. func onal rehab – 317 pa ents, 8 yr follow up – Surgery group fared be er • Pain (16% vs. 25%) • Subjec ve giving way (20% vs. 32%) • Recurrent sprains (22% vs. 34%) • Func onal scores
“opera ve treatment for lateral ligament ruptures can be adopted in cases when higher func onal demands…such as sports at a compe ve level… are required” Ankle Sprains: Treatment • Pihlajamaki, et al. JBJS 2010 – Level 1, 14 yr follow-up – Male Finish military cadets, Grade III sprains – Acute repair vs. func onal rehab – Lower risk of re-injury in surgery group (6% vs. 58%) – Higher incidence of Mild OA (Grade 2) on MRI in surgery group (27% vs. 0%) Paradigm Shi ?
• Early surgery for Acute ankle sprain? • Similar to 1st me shoulder disloca ons? • Poten al problems – Increased complica ons – Higher costs – Availability of OR
• Secondary reconstruc on of G3 injuries is possible even years out, outcomes similar to those of acute repairà More data needed Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability • ~10-25%
• Func onal instability – Impaired propriocep on, neuromuscular control • Mechanical instability – Pathologic laxity – Synovial changes – Chondral damage – Loose bodies DeMaio, Orthopedics 1992 15:241-248 Chronic Lateral Ankle Sprain: Predisposing Factors
• Previous ankle sprain • Propriocep on deficiency • Varus hindfoot (Cavus foot) • Ligamentous laxity – Collagen deficiency – Beighton’s Criteria Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability • History – Pt c/o: Can’t trust ankle, Feeling of giving way, Ankle just gives out – Mul ple sprains – Con nued subacute or chronic pain following sprain
• Pain signifies other pathology as well – Peroneal tendons – OCD or OA – Anterolateral gu er impingement Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Physical Exam • More subtle findings than acute • Ligament laxity more easily noted – Less swelling – Less pain inhibi on • Careful palpa on • Examine hindfoot alignment – Look for cavus – Peek-a-boo heel Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Imaging • Stress x-rays – Ques onable value without Telos machine – Pain inhibi on – No consensus on normal and pathological # – Must compare to “normal” side • But is that side normal? • >3 mm ant. Transla on • >10 deg talar lt – Adds a data point • Signs and symptoms more important
Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Imaging
• MRI – O en done to rule out other pathology • OCDs • Peroneal tendons – Surgical planning Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Treatment • Func onal & Neuromuscular Rehab – Esp. subjec ve instability pa ents • Bracing/Taping – Get through season
• Surgical interven on is indicated when func onal rehab has failed and pt has chronic symptoms Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Surgery
• Address all pathology – 93% intra-ar cular path (Ferkel, Brostrum) – Always scope
– Consider Peroneal tendon pathology Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Op ons for Surgery • > 50 described procedures – 80% G/E results
• How to choose? – Quality of ssue – Degree of laxity – Revision? Op ons for surgery Surgical Technique • Insufficient evidence exists to support any one specific surgical technique • Non-anatomic/tenodesis procedures – Inferior outcomes – Tendency to over ghten • Ankle, subtalar OA – Sacrifice peroneals • Dynamic stabilizer Anatomic Repair • Brostrom (1966)
• Brostrom-Gould (1980)
Pictures from: Baxter’s Foot and Ankle in Sport. Mosby, Inc. 2008 Bone Tunnels vs. Suture Anchors
• No difference in strength or s ffness • Neither as strong as na ve ATFL at T=Ø – 80N vs 160N
Waldrop, et al. Anatomic Suture Anchor Versus the Brostrom Technique for ATFL Repar. AJSM 2012
Outcomes: Pooled Data
• Brostrom/Modified Brostrom (500 cases) – 85-100% successful – Poor results in • Heel varus • Inadequate rehab • Nerve injury • Pre-exis ng arthri s • Significant repeat sprains Anatomic Reconstruc on Anatomic Reconstruc on • As s ff and strong as na ve ATFL T=Ø – Implica on for Rehab – More technically demanding – Need for gra
• Indica ons – Heavy athlete or laborer – Severe laxity – Weak or Deficient ssue precluding direct repair – Revision surgery
• Clanton, et al. Biomechanical Comparison of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Reconstruc on Using Semitendinosus Allogra s With the Intact Ligament; Anterior Talofibular Ligament Ruptures, Part 2:. AJSM 2014
Approaches Post-op Management
• Similar to acute sprain – Week 1 : Protect for 7-10 days – Week 2-5: WBAT boot; DF, PF, no inversion – Week 6: Brace; Func onal Rehab – RTP 10-12 weeks Post-op Management
• Accelerated Rehab vs. Delayed – No immobiliza on vs. cast 4 weeks – Func onal rehab started at 2 weeks • Allowed progression as tolerated – Return to sport 5 weeks sooner – Equal outcomes at 2 years
Miyamoto, et al. Accelerated Versus Tradi onal Rehabilita on A er Anterior Talofibular Ligament Reconstruc on for Chronic Lateral Instability of the Ankle in Athletes. AJSM 2014 Arthroscopic Brostrom
• “all-inside” anatomic repair • Anchors placed percutaneously • Biomechanically = to open • Short term f/u good Anatomic Repair + Synthe c Augment
Stronger than na ve ATFL at T=Ø
Could allow earlier RTP Eversion Ankle Sprains
• 5-15% of all ankle sprains • AKA: high ankle sprains, medial ankle sprains, deltoid ligament sprains • Anatomic classifica on – Tibiofibular syndesmosis – Deltoid ligament – Both Roberts, Orthopedics 1995 18:299-304 Medial Ankle: Deltoid Ligament
• Major ligament complex • Strongest of the ankle ligaments
Seto, Foot and Ankle Anatomy, Slideshare Anatomy
Deltoid Ligament Flexor re nacula • Superficial – Superficial – Tibionavicular ligament – Deep – Anterior talocalcaneal 4 fibrosseous canals ligament – Posterior bial tendon – Posterior biotalar – Flexor hallucis longus ligament – Posterior bial nerve • Deep – Posterior bial a & v – Anterior biotalar ligament Olney in Reckling & Reckling, – Posterior biotalar Orthopaedic Anatomy &Surgical ligament Approaches, 1990: 421-481
Medial Ankle: Tendons
• Posterior bialis (inverter and plantar flexor) • Flexor digitorum longus • Flexor hallucis longus
Seto, Foot and Ankle Anatomy, Slideshare Mechanism of Injury
• External rota on and or forced DF – Talus rotates laterally striking the fibula
• External rota on with the foot pronated – Maissoneuve injury Boy m AJSM 1991 19:294 Lauge-Hansen Acta Chir Scand 1949 97:544 Injury Classifica on
LIGAMENT INJURY STABLE UNSTABLE Syndesmosis Incomplete disrup on Complete disrup on of deep and superficial AND Anterior biofibular por on of the deltoid Deltoid Incomplete tear Complete disrup on of the superficial and deep fibers; may be associated with fracture Deltoid and Anterior Incompletle tear Complete tear talofibular Eversion Ankle Injuries: H&P • History – Mechanism of injury – Pt c/o: medial pain, pain with weight bearing – Neurological symptoms • Physical – Tenderness – Provoca ve tests • External Rota on Stress Test: knee at 90°, foot in neutral • Squeeze Test: bimalleolar compression – Neuro: combined deltoid and syndesmo c injury • 86% peroneal nerve • 83% posterior bial nerve Nitz, AJSM 1985 13:177-182 Eversion Ankle Injuries: Imaging
• X-rays – AP, lateral, mor se • Mor se view: > 3mm medial clear space widening – Stress views • DF and external rota on • Abduc on
• MRI Eversion Ankle Injuries: Treatment
• RICE • Progressive mo on • Strengthening: isometric first • Balance training and func onal rehab • Orthoses – Taping not effec ve Myburgh AJSM 1984 12:441-446 Tendons of the Lateral Ankle
• Peroneus brevis • Peroneus longus – Both serve as the major everters of the ankle – Also serve as plantar flexors
Seto, Foot and Ankle Anatomy, Slideshare Peroneal Tendon Injuries
• Strains • Tears – Complete – Par al
• Isolated • Associated with – Ankle sprains – 5th MT fx – Talar OCD Achilles Tendon Injuries
• Achilles – Greek chie ain – Dipped in the river Styx by his mother The s. – Killed in the Trojan War by an arrow striking his heel where is mother dunked him. Achilles Tendon Anatomy
• 6 cm long, twists 90° laterally • Tendon of the triceps surae, no tendon sheath – 2 heads of the gastroc – Soleus • Nerve: bial n • Superficial posterior compartment Achilles Tendon Anatomy
• Blood supply – Muscle and bony a achments – Avascular zone 2-6cm proximal to inser on • Site of tendinopathy and chronic tears Achilles Tendon
Joint Effec ve • Func on: transmit load PF from gastroc & soleus Gastroc Crosses Knee to calcaneus knee & extended ankle • Forces – Soleus Crosses Ankle in Walking ankle PF & • 1962-2354N knee • 2-3x BW flexed – Running • 3924-5886N • 4-6x BW DeMaio Orthopedics 1995 18:195-204 Achilles Tendini s • Common in runners, • Classifica on dancers – Chronicity • Risk factors – Loca on – Exposure • Inser on • Muscle tendon jxn – Malalignment • Tendon • Cavus – • Pes planovalgus Tendon condi on • Microtear – Obesity • Par al tear – Fluoroquinolones • Complete tear – Inflammatory – Tissue involved arthropathy – Hyperlipoproteinemia (xanthoma) Achilles Histopathology
Chart From Hartog, AAOS OKO, Midsubstance Achilles Tendini s Puddu, AJSM 1976 4:145-150 Kvist, J Pathol 1987 19:1-11 Achilles Tendini s: Diagnosis • History • Differen al Diagnosis – Acute – Muscle disorders • Pop, pain, inability to • Tear, medial head of the walk gastroc – Chronic • Soleus straing • Pain • Compartment syndrome – Running – Tarsal tunnel syndrome – Push off – Bony disorders – On pointe • Os trigonum • Swelling • Sever’s disease • Bump or “squeaking” • Haglund’s (pump bumps) • Weakness with push off – Inflammatory – Acute on chronic arthropathies Achilles Tendini s: Diagnosis
• Pain: Acute or Chronic? – Localized – Arc of tenderness • Nodules may change posi on with DF and PF (moving with the tendon) • Tendon sheath pain does not change with the ROM • ROM • Thompson test Achilles Tendini s: Imaging
• Xray – Normal – Dystrophic calcifica on • Ultrasound • MRI
Echometric Treatment of Chronic Achilles Tendini s • Correct – Training -Flexibility – Strength & endurance -Footwear • Protect the tendon – 3/8” heel li – Night splint – Rest 7-10 days or cast/boot 1 month • Local modali es • Surgery: no response a er 6-12 months, par al tears Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Tears • Non-opera ve vs. Opera ve & Early Loading – Prospec ve, Level 1, 100 pts – f/u at 3, 6, 12 months: sx, ac vity, func on, QOL – Primary outcome: Achilles Total Rupture Score – Results • No significant difference: sx, ac vity, QOL • Trend toward improved func on with surgery • No reruptures in surgical group, 5 in non-surgical
Olsson, AJSM 2013 41:2867-2876 Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendini s • Surgery—Another Paradigm Shi ? Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendini s • Surgery – Open reconstruc on – Percutaneous repair
• Early weightbearing with ankle plan grade – Not detrimental to outcome – Shortens rehabilita on – No effect on strength, muscle atrophy Mafulli AJSM 2003 31 692-700 Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Tears
• Effect of Loading a er Repair, Meta-analysis – 9 studies: 6 RCT, 3 quasi RCT with 402 pts • 6 early wt bearing & ROM, 3 early ROM only – Results • Be er outcomes for early wt bearing and ROM • Similar rerupture rates, complica ons • No advantage of delayed wt bearing Huang AJSM 2014
Ankle Fractures
• Stable = Non-opera ve management – Avulsion fractures – Intact syndesmosis – Intact biotalar joint • Unstable = Surgery – Disrup on of syndesmosis – Unstable biotalar joint Talar Stability
• Mor se stability = talar stability
• Anterior talus is wider than the posterior talus
FOOT INJURIES ANATOMY Fractures
• Forefoot – Sesamoid fractures – Stress fractures • Midfoot – LisFranc fracture disloca ons – Fi h metatarsal fracture • Hindfoot – Calcaneus fractures Myerson, ICL 58, Chapt 56 2009:583-594 LisFranc Fracture Disloca ons
• O en missed, up to 20% – About 30% associated with sports • Spectrum of injury – Ligamentous, bony, both – Associated injury: compartment syndrome • Mechanism: indirect trauma – Axial loading of the foot in PF LisFranc Fracture Disloca ons
• History • Exam – Inability or pain w/ weight bearing – Medial ecchymosis – Midfoot tenderness – “Stress” tests • Compression of midfoot • Dorsal and plantar transla on of the 1rst MT LisFranc Fracture Disloca ons
Prona on abduc on test Medial column squeeze test Myerson, ICL 58, Chapt 56 2009:583-594 LisFranc Fracture Disloca ons: Imaging • X-ray – AP, lateral, oblique (30 deg) • Fleck sign: avulsion from base of 2nd MT • Nutcracker sign: cuboid fx w/ lateral column shortening – Weight bearing comparison AP • Pain may limit FWB • Fluoroscopy: spring test • CT scan • MRI Myerson, ICL 58, Chapt. 56 2009:583-594 LisFranc Fracture Disloca ons:
• Aggressive management and close follow up – Must prove the sprain • <2mm diastasis, stable stress tests • 6 wks NWB – Unstable midfoot, diastasis > 2mm • Early surgery with screw fixa on • NWB 6-8 wks then progressive loading • Planned screw removal
Stress Fractures
• 2nd metatarsal – AKA march fracture – Loca on • 2nd MT: hallux valgus, Hallux rigidus, Morton’s foot • 3rd, 4th MT: most common sites Stress Fractures
• 5th metatarsal – Loca on • I: proximal to tuberosity • II: into the 4-5 ar cula on • III: proximal metaphyseal-diaphyseal junc on – Treatment • Torg: 92% healed in NWB cast at a mean of 7 wks • DeLee: screw fixa on, return at 6 wks So Tissue Injuries
• Plantar Plate Injury • Plantar Fascii s • Entrapment of the first branch of the lateral plantar nerve (of Baxter) • Posterior Tibial Tendon Inflamma on & Tears Other Injuries and Condi ons
• Freiberg’s Infrac on • Painful accessory navicular • Tarsal coali on
• Inser onal tendini s of the bialis anterior Freiberg’s Infrac on
• AVN of the 2nd metatarsal head • Risk factors: Morton’s foot, trauma, surgery • Management – Modify footwear, ac vi es; treat pain – Surgery • Microfracture; Debridement & dorsal wedge osteotomy • Allogra • Arthrodesis, arthroplasty