Lateral Ankle Sprain

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lateral Ankle Sprain ACMS Team Physician CourseSan AntonioFeb 2015 FOOT AND ANKLE PROBLEMS IN ATHLETES Marlene DeMaio, MD Prof, Orthopaedic Surgery, Marshall University; VAMC John J. Jasko, MD Asst Prof, Orthopaedic Surgery, Marshall University ANKLE ANATOMY Seto, Foot and Ankle Anatomy, Slideshare Syndesmosis • Syndesmosis: – Ant. Inf. Tibiofibular ligament – Post. Inf. Tibiofibular ligament – Transverse ;biofibular ligament – Interosseous membrane So Tissue Injuries • Sprains • Tendon strains and tears Primemed.com.au ANKLE SPRAINS • 27,000 per day in U.S. – 25% of all MSK injuries • Most common sports injury – 25-50% of all sports injuries – >50% of all ankle injuries – #1 NCAA surveillance data and ballet, classical dance – 45% of all basketball injuries “It’s just a sprain.” • Not a benign injury – 75% athletes report recurrence – Up to 25% lead to chronic lateral ankle instability and/or pain – Self assessed disability is high – Lost days of work, prac;ce, games • 10-15% of all ;me lost in football • 3-5 weeks lost • Even for lower grade injuries “It’s just a sprain.” • Misdiagnosis, incomplete diagnosis – Bone • Fracture: Ankle, Talus, Maissoneuve, 5th metatarsal • Tarsal coali;on – So ssue • Global laxity, Ehlers Danlos • Tendon injury: Peroneals, Achilles – Nerve disorder • HNP, drop foot • Charcot Marie Tooth DeMaio, Orthopedics 1992:87-96 AnatoMy • Ligament = condensaon of • ATF LigaMent capsule – Fails at 138N AITF – Can undergo greater CFL ATFL plas;c deformaon than CFL • CF LigaMent – Cord like – Fails at 345N – Deep to peroneals Clanton T, et.al. Anatomic study oF Lateral Ligaments. – 105° b/t ATFL CFL Poster at AAOS 2014 AnatoMy: Lateral LigaMent Morphology LIGAMENT WIDTH, mm LENGTH, mM ORIGIN INSERTION Anterior Neck of talus ATF 5 12 border lateral malleolus Fossa lateral Lateral CF 6 6-25 malleolus, tubercle, 10-45 deg calcaneus post angle process Post lat Lateral PTF 6 9 malleolus, post tubercle, talus to CF ligament post process Hollinshead, Textbook oF Anatomy, 3rd ed, 1974: 423-488 Ruth, JBJS-Am, 1961 43: 229-239 MechanisM of Injury: Lateral Ankle Sprains • Weight bearing • Low energy trauma • Example: 230 lb RB, terminal velocity of 22.2 X/sec, decelerang at 13.5 m/sec2 – Force on ankle: 7760N – Stress lateral ankle: 1264.4 lbs – ATF Fails at 138 N, CF at 345N Guise, AJSM 1976 4: 1-6. Lateral Ankle Sprains • Func;on and alignment changes with mo;on PF Neutral DF • Primary inversion stabilizer – Plantarflexion: ATFL – Dorsiflexion: CFL MechanisM of Injury • Lateral ankle sprain: a cascade of injury – Supinaon/Inversion in Plantar-flexion or Neutral • ATFL injured first (“essen;al lesion”) • CFL injured as ankle DF during con;nued inversion – ATFL + CFL 30-60% • PFL last to rupture in extreme inversion, DF Lateral Ankle Sprain: ExaM • Anterior drawer – Tests the ATFL – Slight plantarflexion – Translate anterior and slightly medial • Talar lt – Tests CFL – Neutral flexion – Inversion of hindfoot – Look for dimple • Always compare to other side • Most sensi;ve at ;me 0, then day 7 Lateral Ankle Sprains: Grades Grade Injury Swelling Weight Bearing I ATFL stretch, Mild Mild limp, but tear can WB with brace II ATFL and Moderate Difficult capsular tear + swelling and CFL Bruising III AFTL, capsule, Severe swelling Unable to bear CFL tears and bruising weight Note: Grade IV with avulsion fracture Lateral Ankle Sprains • Classificaon: systems not comparable – AMA : Grades I-IV – Severity – Ligaments • Single: ATF ligament and capsule • Double: ATF and CF ligaments • Triple: ATF, CF, and PTF ligaments Imaging: X-ray Indicaons • Onawa Rules • Inability to bear weight AP, lateral, MorUse • Bony tenderness Oowa Rules • Xrays are indicated to r/o fx if: – Presentaon within 10 days of injury – Inability to bear weight at ;me of injury or at presentaon – Tenderness over then distal 6cm of malleoli, posterior aspect – Tenderness over the base of the 5th metatarsal or navicular IMaging: MRI IndicaUons • If isolated injury, f/u exam in 1-2 weeks • MRI if – Persistent significant swelling – Tenderness: • Peroneals • Lateral talus • Anterior calcaneus – Syndesmosis injury suspected • R/o concomitant pathology Lateral Ankle Sprains: TreatMent • Isolated acute Grade I & II lateral ankle sprains – Universal consensus – Ini;al non-operave treatment of • Grade III – “Near” consensus – Some new evidence may change this Lateral Ankle Sprains: TreatMent • Benign Neglect – Not appropriate – 75% recurrence rates – RR=2.3 for CAI without func;onal rehab Lateral Ankle Sprains: TreatMent • RICE: 24-48 hours • Control pain • Limit swelling • Reduce hypoxic injury during acute inflammaon • Protect Ligaments, Stabilize the Joint – Trauma creates temporary instability – True healing takes >8 weeks – External support: Braces, cast, boot, tape • FuncUonal RehabilitaUon – Neuromuscular and sport/task training DeMaio, Orthopedics 1992 15:87-96 and 241-248 FuncUonal RehabilitaUon • AXer LAS paents exhibit deficits in – Joint posi;on sense – Isometric strength in mul;ple planes of mo;on – Postural control on the involved and uninvolved limb • Posi;ve modified Rhomberg – Abnormal EMG (Nitz AJSM 1985 13:177-182) • Peroneal nerve, 86% Grade III • Tibial nerve, 83% Grade III • Lack of neuromuscular retraining leads to recurrent injury, chronic problems – 2.3 x risk of recurrence FuncUonal Rehab: CoMponents • Early Joint mobilizaon • Strengthening • Sensorimotor/balance – Wobble board – Trampoline • Single/double leg Postural control • Connue external support • Propriocep;ve feedback • Con;nued protec;on of ligaments Meta-Analyses/Level 1 Evidence • FuncUonal Rehab > prolonged iMMobiliZaUon – Faster return to sport, work – Fewer long term symptoms – Bener ROM • SeMi-rigid external support beXer than cast & Ace – S;rrup ≥ Lace up brace > tape > Elas;c wrap – SLC/boot useful in G3 (Lamb et al. Lancet 2009) • Short tem use (days) only Meta-Analyses: Level 1 Evidence • Petersen et al. Arch Ortho Trauma 2013 • Lamb,et al. Lancet 2009 • Beynnon et al. AJSM 2006 • Ardevol et al. KSSTA 2002 • Kerkhoffs et al. Cochrane 2002 • Kerkhoffs et al. Acta Ortho Scand. 2003 Taping • Pros • Cons – Custom – Rapid loosening – Provides propriocepve • AXer 10 mins, 40% of strength feedback lost • 50% decrease in ROM aer 2 1/2 – Lightweight, low bulk -3 hrs – May be useful when • 45-60 minutesàminimal effect swelling prevents fing – Trained personnel of an orthosis – Expensive over the season – Variable effects on performance DeMaio, Orthopedics 1992 15:87-96 Taping vs. Brace for Sports • Both shown to prevent ankle sprains – Braces overall more effec;ve – Braces cost less per season • Much more effec;ve on athlete with h/o prior ankle sprain “Marshall” AlgorithM • Brace: S;rrup/ Lace up /Combo • Boot in G3 – To brace in few days • TED hose • WBAT with crutches if limping – NWB A/PROM • Func;onal Rehab Return to Play • Subjec;ve symptoms – Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) • Func;onal tests – Star Excursion Balance • Simplfied to Y – Single leg balance – Single leg heel to toe raises • 60/minute Ankle Sprains: TreatMent • Func;onal rehab bener than immobilizaon – Start with DF, eversion – Ac;ve resistance: isometric first • Peroneals • Dorsiflexors • Evertors • Role for acute surgical interven;on in selected cases? Ankle Sprains: TreatMent • Pinjenburg, et al. 2002 – RPT Level II – Acute repair vs. func;onal rehab – 317 paents, 8 yr follow up – Surgery group fared bener • Pain (16% vs. 25%) • Subjec;ve giving way (20% vs. 32%) • Recurrent sprains (22% vs. 34%) • Func;onal scores “operaBve treatment for lateral ligament ruptures can be adopted in cases when higher funcBonal demands…such as sports at a compeBBve level… are required” Ankle Sprains: TreatMent • PihlajaMaki, et al. JBJS 2010 – Level 1, 14 yr follow-up – Male Finish military cadets, Grade III sprains – Acute repair vs. func;onal rehab – Lower risk of re-injury in surgery group (6% vs. 58%) – Higher incidence of Mild OA (Grade 2) on MRI in surgery group (27% vs. 0%) Paradigm ShiN? • Early surgery for Acute ankle sprain? • Similar to 1st ;me shoulder dislocaons? • Poten;al problems – Increased complicaons – Higher costs – Availability of OR • Secondary reconstruc;on of G3 injuries is possible even years out, outcomes similar to those of acute repairà More data needed Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability • ~10-25% • Func;onal instability – Impaired propriocepon, neuromuscular control • Mechanical instability – Pathologic laxity – Synovial changes – Chondral damage – Loose bodies DeMaio, Orthopedics 1992 15:241-248 Chronic Lateral Ankle Sprain: Predisposing Factors • Previous ankle sprain • Propriocep;on deficiency • Varus hindfoot (Cavus foot) • Ligamentous laxity – Collagen deficiency – Beighton’s Criteria Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability • History – Pt c/o: Can’t trust ankle, Feeling of giving way, Ankle just gives out – Mul;ple sprains – Connued subacute or chronic pain following sprain • Pain signifies other pathology as well – Peroneal tendons – OCD or OA – Anterolateral guner impingement Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Physical Exam • More subtle findings than acute • Ligament laxity more easily noted – Less swelling – Less pain inhibi;on • Careful palpaon • Examine hindfoot alignment – Look for cavus – Peek-a-boo heel Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability: Imaging • Stress x-rays – Ques;onable value without Telos machine – Pain inhibi;on – No consensus on normal and pathological # – Must compare to “normal” side • But is that side normal? • >3 mm ant. Translaon • >10 deg talar ;lt – Adds a data point • Signs and symptoms more important Chronic Lateral
Recommended publications
  • Does Generalised Ligamentous Laxity Increase Seasonal Incidence of Injuries in Male First Division Club Rugby Players? D R Stewart, S B Burden
    457 Br J Sports Med: first published as 10.1136/bjsm.2003.004861 on 23 July 2004. Downloaded from ORIGINAL ARTICLE Does generalised ligamentous laxity increase seasonal incidence of injuries in male first division club rugby players? D R Stewart, S B Burden ............................................................................................................................... Br J Sports Med 2004;38:457–460. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2003.004861 Objectives: To investigate if ligamentous laxity increases seasonal incidence of injury in male first division See end of article for club rugby players, and to determine if strength protects against injury in hypermobile and tight players. authors’ affiliations Methods: Fifty one male first division club rugby players were examined for ligamentous laxity using the ....................... Beighton-Horan assessment and graded with an overall laxity score ranging from 0 (tight) to 9 (hyperlax). Correspondence to: Each participant was classified into a group determined by their laxity score: tight (0–3), hypermobile (4– Mr Stewart, Waikato 6), or excessively hypermobile (7–9). The incidence of joint injuries was recorded prospectively throughout Institute of Technology, the rugby season and correlated with laxity score. Differences between the groups were analysed. Centre for Sport and Results: The overall prevalence of generalised joint hypermobility was 24% (12/51). The incidence of Exercise Science, Private Bag 3036, Hamilton 2020, injuries was significantly higher in hypermobile (116.7 per 1000 hours) than tight (43.6 per 1000 hours) New Zealand; players (p = 0.034). There were no significant differences in peak strength between the hypermobile and dwane_stewart@yahoo. tight groups. co.nz Conclusions: The laxity of the players may explain the differences in injury rates between these groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Standard of Care: Ankle Sprain ICD 9 Codes
    BRIGHAM AND WOMEN’S HOSPITAL Department of Rehabilitation Services Physical Therapy Standard of Care: Ankle Sprain ICD 9 Codes: 845.00 Secondary supporting ICD 9 codes: 719.7 Difficulty walking 719.07 Effusion of ankle/ foot Choose these or any additional secondary ICD 9 codes based upon individual’s impairments. Case Type / Diagnosis: Practice Pattern 4E – Impaired joint mobility, motor function, muscle performance and ROM associated with localized inflammation Practice Pattern 4D – Impaired joint mobility, motor function, muscle performance and ROM associated with connective tissue dysfunction Ankle sprain is a common injury with a high rate of recurrence usually as a result of landing on a plantarflexed and inverted foot. Each day, an estimated 23 000 ankle sprains occur in the United States1. Ankle sprains account for 85% of ankle injuries and 85% of sprains involve lateral structures.2 They account for 25% of all sports related injuries.3 No significant female-male ratios were found. Risk can be increased in individuals that are overweight and less physically active.4 Weekend type athletes also have an increased risk. The lateral ligaments are most commonly involved, then the medial ligaments, then the syndesmosis. Ankle sprains are usually treated non-surgically.3 Careful evaluation determines prognosis, progression of treatment and may detect other injuries. Forty percent of lateral sprains develop chronic ankle instability (CAI).5 This is defined as a combination of persistent symptoms and repetitive lateral ankle sprains.6 Ligaments involved and mechanism of injury3 • Laterally – The anterior talofibular ligament (ATFL), posterior talofibular ligament (PTFL), calcaneofibular ligament (CF) are responsible for resistance against inversion and internal rotation stress.
    [Show full text]
  • Point/Counterpoint Capsulotomy During Hip Arthroscopy: to Close Or Not to Close by Sherwin Ho, MD
    Arthroscopy Association of North America Point/Counterpoint Capsulotomy During Hip Arthroscopy: To Close or Not to Close By Sherwin Ho, MD CAM lesion that extends further similar to the athletic shoulder who Introduction: laterally, I will add a vertical “T” cut present with a posterior capsular s hip arthroscopy has along the neck of the femur, which contracture combined with anterior become more widespread, I will repair with non-absorbable #2 capsular laxity, while in the FAI hip Aanterior capsular release or sutures in patients with generalized in athletes we see just the opposite: capsulotomy has become more ligamentous laxity, normal or above an anterior capsular contracture and popular and well-accepted to allow normal abduction and external posterior capsular laxity. for better access, visualization, and rotation (ABER), and/or marked working space during labral repair femoral anteversion. I will only close Capsular Repair and decompression. There remains the entire capsulotomy in patients By Shane J. Nho, MD controversy, however, regarding with documented or suspected ver the past few years, the the pros and cons of repairing the instability. role of the hip joint capsule capsule at the conclusion of the Oand management of the hip procedure. The following Point/ However, in my experience, the capsule has been debated. The Counterpoint discussion presents vast majority of my patients with a surgeon that is performing hip the opinions of the 2 hip surgeons labral tear and FAI present with a arthroscopy has to understand the from Chicago, both of whom are thickened, tight and painful anterior anatomic structure and function of faculty members at their respective capsule, decreased ABER rotation the osseous and soft tissues being academic institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Types of Crooked Legs in Foals Article
    2/19/2020 Types of crooked legs in foals University of Minnesota Extension https://extension.umn.edu Types of crooked legs in foals Quick facts Generally, leg deformities in foals have a good outcome if you start treatment early. If you leave moderate to severe cases untreated, crippling problems will occur as the foal matures. Pain associated with crippling problems make these horse unrideable. Tendon laxity Tendon laxity refers to a disorder that causes weak flexor tendons. It’s common in newborn foals, especially premature foals. This condition usually fixes itself with controlled exercise. Controlled exercise includes stretching the muscle-tendon unit, which can include: Trimming the feet. Bandaging to promote relaxation. Oxytetracycline to relax the muscle. A small bandage can help the limb if it’s hitting the ground. Avoid using a heavy support bandage in this case as it will worsen the condition. Ligamentous laxity Ligamentous laxity refers to a disorder that causes loose ligaments. It’s common in newborns but is often self-limiting. You can manually straighten the legs, but weight bearing can cause crookedness. Controlled exercise will strengthen the ligaments and keep the legs in better alignment. Tendon contracture X-ray of a foal with leg deformities due to Tendon contracture refers to a disorder that causes the tendons to be really tight. It trauma in the growth plate. The bone length can include the following conditions: is different below the growth plate (yellow lines). Club feet Fetlock contracture Carpal contracture These conditions are a relative difference between tendon length and leg length. Always check foals born with contracture for undershot jaws.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Forefoot Conditions Mr Nadeem Mushtaq
    Common Forefoot Conditions What can I do in the Primary Care Setting & when to Refer? Mr Nadeem Mushtaq Department of Trauma & Orthopaedics Contact Mr Nadeem Mushtaq Consultant Trauma & Orthopaedic Surgeon Imperial College Healthcare, London Head of Foot & Ankle and Trauma . St Mary’s Hospital, Paddington . The Lindo Wing – St. Mary’s Paddington . The Hospital of St. John & St. Elizabeth . The Bupa Cromwell NHS Secretary Private Secretary tel: 02078673747 [email protected] email: [email protected] Aims Todays topics Understanding the Foot Hallux valgus Hallux rigidus Morton’s Neuroma Plantar Fasciitis Friedberg’s Disease Lesser Toe Disorders Introduction . 26 Bones (+ sesamoids & accessory) . Joints . Muscles . Tendons . Function . Weight - standing / walking / running Hallux valgus ( not bunion) • Hallux valgus • is lateral deviation of the big toe at 1st MTPJ • BUT – is that all •? clinical • 9:1 female : male • 15:1 shoes : barefoot • 23% in aged 18-65 years (CI: 16.3 to 29.6) • 35.7% in aged over 65 years (CI: 29.5 to 42.0) • Prevalence increases with age and is higher in females Causes . genetic predisposition with an imbalance of intrinsic and extrinsic forces on the joint. Instability in the MTPJ or TMT joint combined with tight footwear results in the classical deformity which over time becomes fixed and painful. Medical conditions may also predispose to developing the condition (Table 1). Medical conditions predisposing Gout Rheumatoid arthritis Psoriatic arthropathy Joint hypermobility Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, Marfan's syndrome ligamentous laxity Down's syndrome Multiple sclerosis Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease Cerebral palsy Presentation: usually due to pain . pain over the bunion (bursa pain) .
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Management of Patellar Instability
    12 Review Article Page 1 of 10 Evaluation and management of patellar instability Elizabeth R. Dennis^, Simone Gruber^, William A. Marmor^, Beth E. Shubin Stein^ The Patellofemoral Center, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA Contributions: (I) Conception and design: BE Shubin Stein, ER Dennis; (II) Administrative support: All authors; (III) Provision of study material or patients: BE Shubin Stein; (IV) Collection and assembly of data: All authors; (V) Data analysis and interpretation: BE Shubin Stein, ER Dennis; (VI) Manuscript writing: All authors; (VII) Final approval of manuscript: All authors. Correspondence to: Elizabeth R. Dennis, MD, MS. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021, USA. Email: [email protected]. Abstract: Patellar instability is a common clinical problem that primarily affects the adolescent and young adult population. The demographic and anatomic risk factors that predispose patients to patellar instability are multifactorial and include young age, female sex, trochlear dysplasia, elevated tibial tubercle to trochlear groove distance (TT-TG), patella alta, femoral and tibial malalignment, ligamentous laxity, and lack of neuromuscular control. There have been substantial efforts to predict which patients who sustain a first-time dislocation will go on to incur additional dislocations. This is particularly important because with each dislocation event, there is a significant risk of injury to the patellofemoral joint including both medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) stretch or rupture and damage to the cartilage which can range from simple fissures to full-thickness cartilage defects and osteochondral fractures. Prediction models have demonstrated that amongst first time dislocators, young patients with trochlear dysplasia are at the highest risk for redislocation.
    [Show full text]
  • Recurrent Bilateral Forelimb Contracture in an Arabian Filly With
    Recurrent Bilateral Forelimb Contracture in an Arabian Filly with Suspect Marfan’s Syndrome Audrey J. Tucker Mississippi State University College of Veterinary Medicine Class of 2019 Clinicopathological Conference Presented on June 15th, 2018 CPC Advisor: Catheen Mochal-King, DVM, MS, Diplomate ACVS-LA Associate Professor, Equine Surgery Department of Clinical Sciences 1 Introduction: A 17-month-old, 313 kg chestnut Egyptian Arabian filly originally presented for an approximate 6-month history of bilateral flexural forelimb deformities despite having a bilateral distal digital check ligament desmotomy performed at 13 months of age. The filly would present again at 23, 24, 28, 30, and 32 months of age for recurrent bilateral forelimb contracture. After each successive hospital visit, she demonstrated resolution of clinical signs, however, it was not sustained. The chronicity of contracture in this filly is likely due to the connective tissue disorder known as Marfan’s Syndrome. History and Presentation: Upon presentation the filly exhibited a grade V/V lameness in the right forelimb and a grade IV/V lameness in the left forelimb. There was significant contracture observed bilaterally at the level of the distal interphalangeal joint and consequently, a bilateral club foot conformation. The contracture was so severe that the filly was walking on the dorsal hoof capsule of the right forelimb. The filly’s physical exam parameters were within normal limits with exception given to her bilateral club foot conformation. Her distal limbs were thoroughly evaluated to rule out abnormalities that may have been contributing to her lameness. No external wounds, palpable joint effusion or swellings were noted on the examination of the distal limbs.
    [Show full text]
  • On Changes in Length of Dense Collagenous Tissues: Growth and Contracture
    On Changes in Length of Dense Collagenous Tissues: Growth and Contracture L.E. Dahners G.E. Lester Department of Orthopaedic Surgery University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill CB# 7055 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599-7055 (919) 966-3340 Fax (919) 966-6730 On Changes in Length of Dense Collagenous Tissues: Growth and Contracture ABSTRACT This paper summarizes experimental work on ligament growth and contracture carried out in our laboratories over the past decade and a half. Although previous bone, muscle and tendon studies have shown that these tissues grow, for the most part, at "growth plates", our marking suture studies demonstrated that, in ligament, longitudinal growth and contracture both occur as diffuse processes in which material is added or removed interstitially. In our studies, growth of ligamentous tissue appeared to be influenced by systemic hormonal factors, but was locally mediated by mechanical tension, or lack of tension, which caused an increase or decrease in growth throughout the length of the ligament. We found that the actin cytoskeleton of the fibroblast was involved in the contracture of lax ligaments, presumably producing the necessary mechanical force. This contracture phenomenon is hypothesized to retighten microstretch ligament injuries throughout life and to result in the clinical problem of contracture of capsular ligaments during joint immobilization. Simulated stress generated electrical potentials (SGEPs) diminished the contracture process, indicating that an absence of SGEPs may serve as one signal that the tissue is not being mechanically loaded. Our work supports the hypothesis that the mechanism of length changes in ligament and tendon involves the sliding of discontinuous collagen fibrils past one another.
    [Show full text]
  • Knee and Shoulder
    Practical Office Orthopedics: Knee and Shoulder Carlin Senter, MD Associate Professor Primary Care Sports Medicine UCSF Medicine and Orthopaedics 10/12/2019 Learning objectives Upon completion of this session, participants should be able to: 1. Name 3 exam maneuvers to identify a meniscus tear. 2. List 3 views to order for knee x-rays 3. Explain treatment for degenerative meniscus tear +/- OA 4. Name 2 causes of shoulder pain when both active and passive range of motion are limited. 5. Identify a full thickness rotator cuff tear on physical exam. 6. Explain treatment for rotator cuff disease Knee cases Musculoskeletal work-up ▪ History ▪ Inspection ▪ Palpation ▪ Range of motion ▪ Other Tests Case #1 35 y/o woman with medial-sided pain and swelling of the R knee x 12 weeks. Twisted the knee playing soccer. No locking, no instability. Symptoms ongoing despite 6 weeks of physical therapy. She brings with her normal x-rays. R knee exam: ▪ (+) effusion ▪ ROM 0-130, slightly limited due to effusion and tightness ▪ Tender medial joint line. No bony tenderness. ▪ Medial knee pain with McMurray testing and squat ▪ No ligamentous laxity What do you recommend next? A. Orthotics for arch support for her feet B. Patellar taping to medialize the patella C. Medial compartment unloader brace D. Knee aspiration and corticosteroid injection E. Knee MRI Case #1 35 y/o woman with medial-sided pain and swelling of the R knee x 12 weeks. Twisted the knee playing soccer. No locking, no instability. Symptoms ongoing despite 6 weeks of physical therapy. She brings with her normal x-rays.
    [Show full text]
  • Clinical Effects of Prolotherapy for Chronic Foot and Ankle Pain
    CHAPTER 35 CLINICAL EFFECTS OF PROLOTHERAPY FOR CHRONIC FOOT AND ANKLE PAIN George J. Rivello, DPM Amir N. Hajimirsadheghi, DPM INTRODUCTION Prolotherapy or proliferative therapy is an injection-based treatment for chronic ligamentous injury, tendinopathy, or joint pain. Animal models suggest prolotherapy may enlarge and strengthen ligament and tendon insertions, although the mechanism is unclear (1-7). Prolotherapy injection protocols were pioneered in the 1950s by George Hackett, MD, a general surgeon in the US (8). Although there are multiple theories on the mechanism of prolotherapy, the dominant theory suggests dextrose acts as a biologically inactive infl ammatory substance, which stimulates tissue repair. The injection of an infl ammatory solution briefl y stimulates the infl ammatory cascade to simulate an acute injury without deforming tissue (9) Figure 1. Early and late infl ammation (days) leads to fi broblast proliferation (Figure 1). The infl ammatory cascade at the site of injection creating granulation tissue (weeks), and eventually collagen maturation and healing or scar formation (months to years) (adapted from ref. 7). induces fi broblast proliferation and subsequent collagen synthesis, resulting in a tighter and stronger ligament or to provide information on the medium term outcomes of tendon (4). prolotherapy injections, as well as study the side effects Prolotherapy has multiple applications in ligamentous associated with treatment. and joint pain in the human body. It has been described in the treatment of osteoarthritic joints (10-13), musculoskeletal MATERIALS AND METHODS pain ( 14-19), low back pain ( 20-22), lateral epicondylosis (23-25), and ligamentous laxity (26). More specifi cally, it Following Sharp Healthcare Institutional Review Board has been described for treatment of tendons and ligaments approval, electronic medical records were retrospectively in the foot and ankle (27-30), Achilles tendonitis (3-37) as reviewed.
    [Show full text]
  • Tendon — Function-Related Structure, Simple Healing Process and Mysterious Ageing J
    Folia Morphol. Vol. 77, No. 3, pp. 416–427 DOI: 10.5603/FM.a2018.0006 R E V I E W A R T I C L E Copyright © 2018 Via Medica ISSN 0015–5659 www.fm.viamedica.pl Tendon — function-related structure, simple healing process and mysterious ageing J. Zabrzyński1, Ł. Łapaj2, Ł. Paczesny3, A. Zabrzyńska4, D. Grzanka5 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Multidisciplinary Hospital, Inowroclaw, Poland 2Department of General, Oncologic Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Karol Marcinkowski Medical University, Poznan, Poland 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Orvit Clinic, Torun, Poland 4Division of Radiology, Dr Blazek’s District Hospital, Inowroclaw, Poland 5Department of Clinical Pathomorphology, University Hospital No. 1, Bydgoszcz, Poland [Received: 5 November 2017; Accepted: 5 January 2018] Tendons are connective tissue structures of paramount importance to human ability of locomotion. The understanding of their physiology and pathology is gaining importance as advances in regenerative medicine are being made today. So far, very few studies were conducted to extend the knowledge about pathology, healing response and management of tendon lesions. In this paper we summarise actual knowledge on structure, process of healing and ageing of the tendons. The structure of tendon is optimised for the best performance of the tissue. Despite the simplicity of the healing response, nume- rous studies showed that the problems with full recovery are common and much more significant than we thought; that is why we discussed the issue of immo- bilisation and mechanical stimulation during healing process. The phenomenon of tendons’ ageing is poorly understood. Although it seems to be a natural and painless process, it is completely different from degeneration in tendinopathy.
    [Show full text]
  • Lateral Ankle Instability
    Lateral Ankle Instability Craig S. Radnay, M.D., M.P.H. Insall Scott Kelly® Institute for Orthopaedics & Sports Medicine New York, New York February 8, 2020 Lateral Ankle Sprains • Most common LE injury • 1 sprain per 10,000 people/day – 30,000 per day in US – 25% of all athletic injuries – 21-53% of basketball injuries – 17-29% of soccer injuries – 1/3 West Point cadets sustain an ankle sprain in their tenure Ankle sprains: Lateral Ligamentous Complex of the Ankle • Primary static stabilizers of the ankle – Anterior Talofibular Ligament (ATFL) • 1° restraint to inversion in PF • Lies within capsular layer – Calcaneofibular Ligament (CFL) • 1° restraint to inversion in neutral, DF • In line with SPR, spans ankle + ST – Posterior Talofibular Ligament (PTFL) • Strongest; usually not disrupted Lateral Ankle Sprains MRI rarely indicated in the acute setting Elite athlete: help guide time out of sports and timing of rehab exercises Commonly missed diagnoses – Concomittant syndesmosis injury – Peroneal tendon injuries – Achilles tendon injury Cavovarus foot Lateral Ankle Sprains – Commonly missed fractures Osteochondral lesion talus Lateral Process of the Talus Anterior process of calcaneus Fifth metatarsal Lisfranc injuries Ankle sprains - Treatment • Physical therapy program – Proprioceptive training – Peroneal strengthening – Lace-up or stirrup brace Ankle Sprains • Majority of patients recover with non- operative treatment • Acute surgical repair not supported by literature • 3-6 mos of nonsurgical treatment • BUT: – 20-40% persistent
    [Show full text]