Open Records Information Provided by the Office of the Governor in March 2011

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Open records information provided by the Office of the Governor in March 2011 -On average, information was provided within 15 days On February 18, 2011, Sue Dvorsky, Iowa Democratic Party, requested documents regarding (1) “pension and salary,” (2) the annual budget for Terrace Hill, and (3) the annual budget for Governor Branstad’s transportation across the state. On March 15, 2011, 39 emails and four documents were provided at no charge. On February 23, 2011, Chris McClure of West Des Moines, Iowa requested any correspondence to or from Bob Vander Plaats, The Family Leader, Iowans for Freedom, Opportunities Unlimited, and American Family Association. On March 10, 2011, 2 pages were provided at no charge. On February 27, 2011, Nathan Tucker, Iowa Judicial Watch, requested all documents regarding the nine finalists for the Iowa Supreme Court. On March 22, 2011, 549 letters and emails were provided at a charge of $22.20. On March 4, 2011, Lori Elrod, Blake & Uhlig, P.A., requested all documents regarding Executive Order 69, U.S. Cellular Center, and the Iowa Veterans Home Project. On March 30, 2011, 80 emails and 3 pages in hard copy were provided. There was a charge of $297 for this request. On March 7, 2011, Clark Kauffman, Des Moines Register, requested all correspondence between the Governor’s Office and The Iowa Psychological Association, the Iowa Healthcare Association, Iowa Long- Term Care Ombudsman Jeanne Yordi, and Iowa Department of Inspections and Appeals Director Rod Roberts. On March 22, 2011, 85 emails and one page were provided at no charge. On March 8, 2011, Becky Brockmann of Hartley, Iowa requested all applications for the Cosmetology Board. On March 11, 2011, 44 pages were provided at a cost of $3.40 for copies. On March 30, 2011, Don Burgmaier, Des Moines, Iowa, requested all documents regarding a DHS investigation. On March 31, 2011, one page was provided at no cost. .

Copy Link

Recommended publications

Independent Expenditures for Or Against State Candidates Or Ballot Issues in Iowa
Independent Expenditures For or Against State Candidates or Ballot Issues in Iowa Organization Name Organization City Organization State Organization Zip Iowa Association for Justice West Des Moines IA 50266 Iowa Citizens for Community Des Moines IA 50311 Improvement Action Fund National Association of REALTORS CHICAGO IL 60611 Fund Taxpayers Protection Alliance Washington DC 20005 National Association of REALTORS CHICAGO IL 60611 Fund Working America Washington DC 20006 Working America Washington DC 20006 Working America Washington DC 20006 Americans For Prosperity Arlington VA 22201 Americans For Prosperity Arlington VA 22201 Americans For Prosperity Arlington VA 22201 AFA Action, Inc. West Des Moines IA 50266 AFA Action, Inc. West Des Moines IA 50266 Page 1 of 2324 09/29/2021 Independent Expenditures For or Against State Candidates or Ballot Issues in Iowa Organization Email Contact First Name Contact Last Name Contact Email [email protected] Andrew Mertens [email protected] Matthew Covington [email protected] MARC GALL [email protected] David Williams [email protected] MARC GALL [email protected] Krissi Jimroglou [email protected] Krissi Jimroglou [email protected] Krissi Jimroglou [email protected] Alex Varban [email protected] Alex Varban [email protected] Alex Varban [email protected] Bob Vander Plaats [email protected] [email protected] Bob Vander Plaats [email protected] Page 2 of 2324 09/29/2021 Independent Expenditures For or Against State Candidates
[Show full text]
Letter from Iowa: Same-Sex Marriage and the Ouster of Three Justices
PETTYS FINAL 5/14/2011 12:44:21 PM Letter from Iowa: Same-Sex Marriage and the Ouster of Three Justices Todd E. Pettys∗ I. INTRODUCTION On November 2, 2010, voters in Iowa fired three of the Iowa Supreme Court’s seven justices.1 Under constitutional reforms that Iowans had adopted nearly half a century earlier, each of those justices had been appointed by the state’s governor from a list of names supplied by the state’s judicial nominating commission,2 but then was required to stand for a retention vote after a short initial period of service and every eight years thereafter.3 Chief Justice Marsha Ternus had been appointed to the state’s high court by Republican Governor Terry Branstad in 1993 and was on the November 2010 ballot seeking her third eight-year term; Justice Michael Streit had been appointed by Democratic Governor Tom Vilsack in 2001 and was seeking his second eight-year term; and Justice David Baker had been appointed by Democratic Governor Chet Culver in 2008 and was seeking his first eight-year term.4 Under ordinary circumstances, each of those justices would have been virtually guaranteed success on Election Day. Since Iowa moved from an ∗ H. Blair and Joan V. White Professor of Law, University of Iowa College of Law. I wish to thank Justice Randy Holland, Steve McAllister, and the editors of the Kansas Law Review for inviting me to participate in this symposium; Michelle Falkoff, Linda McGuire, Caroline Sheerin, and John Whiston for their helpful comments on earlier drafts; and Karen Anderson for her helpful comments and research assistance.
[Show full text]
Bob Vander Plaats and Chuck Hurley Endorse
Fred Karger 3699 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1290 O- Los Angeles> CA 90010 j > r' < c \ June 13, 2013 Office of the General Counsel _ , ^ ^ Federal Election Commission ^ f ^ 999 E Street, N:W. MUR # f OJ Washington, DC 20463 I want to bring to your attention possible violations of the Federal Election Campaign Act by former United States Senator Rick Santorum, the National Organization for Marriage and Mr. Bob V/ander Plaats. I respectfully ask the Federal Election Commission to conduct a full investigation into the likelihood that the National Organization for Marriage, its officers and major supporters paid the Family Leader and its president Mr. Bob Vander Plaats up to $1 million to secure its ' endorsement of then presidential candidate Rick Santorum. Mr. Vander Plaats' endorsement ? of Mr. Santorum occurred just two weeks before the Iowa Caucus and enabled Mr. Santorum to , beat former Governor Mitt Rornney in the first contest of the 2012 Presidential Campaign. i Additionally, it appears that there was coordination between the Santorum for President Campaign, Mr. Brian Brown, President of the National Organization for Marriage and Mr. Bob Vander Plaats, President of the Family Leader for the purpose of funding the Vander Plaats created Super PAC, Families for Leaders. The Familiesfor Leaders Super PAC was established to , support Mr. Santorum in Iowa. | I Complainant and Respondents Complainant: Fred Karger 3699 Wilshire Blvd., Suite 1290 Los Angeles, CA 90010 Respondents: Siehator Rick Santorum P.O. Box 37 Verona, PA 15147 National Organization for Marriage, Inc. Mr. Brian Brown, President 2029 K Street, NW Suite 300 Washington, DC 20006 Mr.
[Show full text]
State Court Protection of Reproductive Rights: the Past, the Perils, and the Promise
State Court Protection of Reproductive Rights: The Past, the Perils, and the Promise Author Dawn Johnsen, Walter W. Foskett Professor of Law, Indiana University Maurer School of Law* Date April 3, 2015 Funding Piper Fund Abstract The courts of the fifty states possess broad authority to safeguard or diminish reproductive autonomy and, as a consequence, the status of health care, reproductive justice, and the well being of women, children, and families in their jurisdictions. Now, more than forty years after Roe vs. Wade and almost fifty years after Griswold v. Connecticut, state courts are as important as at any time since those landmark decisions. In this article, the author surveys the role of state courts in light of increased challenges to both their independence and women’s reproductive rights. Overlapping factors, such as a heightened threat to the availability of legal abortion services, and an increase in efforts to populate state courts with judges opposed to reproductive rights converge to create special urgency for attention to state courts. The paper first generally describes the role of the state courts relative to the federal courts on these issues. The next section discusses the interactions of state and federal courts in more detail, delving into specific cases to illustrate this concept. Johnsen then details strategies to re-criminalizing abortion by seeking the creation of separate legal rights for fertilized eggs, embryos, and fetuses in as many contexts as possible, under state and federal law. There are numerous examples that illustrate the diversity of contexts in which state courts may confront the assertion of rights of embryos or fetuses against pregnant (or previously pregnant) women who carried them.
[Show full text]
The Christian Right and Israel: a Love Story?
W&M ScholarWorks Undergraduate Honors Theses Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 4-2017 The Christian Right and Israel: A Love Story? Joseph Malanson College of William and Mary Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses Part of the American Politics Commons, and the Christianity Commons Recommended Citation Malanson, Joseph, "The Christian Right and Israel: A Love Story?" (2017). Undergraduate Honors Theses. Paper 1113. https://scholarworks.wm.edu/honorstheses/1113 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Undergraduate Honors Theses by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. 0 Table of Contents Table of Contents ........................................................................................................................... 1 Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................................ 2 I. Introduction: Israel, Evangelicals, and the Christian Right ........................................................ 3 II. Interest Groups, Religion, and American Foreign Policy: The Literature .............................. 10 III. Hypotheses and Data Descriptions ........................................................................................ 31 IV. Israel, the Christian Right, and Republican Party Presidential Primaries
[Show full text]
Walker Leads GOP Field by 10 in Iowa, Clinton Over 60%
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE April 28, 2015 INTERVIEWS: Tom Jensen 919-744-6312 IF YOU HAVE BASIC METHODOLOGICAL QUESTIONS, PLEASE E-MAIL [email protected], OR CONSULT THE FINAL PARAGRAPH OF THE PRESS RELEASE Walker leads GOP field by 10 in Iowa, Clinton over 60% Raleigh, N.C. – PPP's newest Iowa poll finds Scott Walker well ahead of the rest of the Republican field in Iowa, getting 23% to 13% for Marco Rubio, 12% for Jeb Bush, 10% each for Mike Huckabee and Rand Paul, 8% for Ted Cruz, 7% for Ben Carson, 5% for Chris Christie, and 4% for Rick Perry. Walker has the highest favorability out of anyone in the field, with 59% of voters viewing him favorably to 13% who have an unfavorable view. The key to Walker's success is that he's winning both among voters who are most concerned about electability in the general election and among voters who are most concerned with having the most conservative candidate. Among voters who say being able to win in the general is their top priority, Walker gets 21% to edge out Marco Rubio (20%) and Jeb Bush (17%). His lead is much more emphatic among voters saying conservatism is their top priority- with them he gets 29% to 14% for Cruz, 12% for Paul, and 10% for Huckabee. Rubio's second place standing reflects his recent rise nationally. Boding well for him is that beyond being in second place overall, he is also tied with Walker for being the most frequent second choice of voters at 13%.
[Show full text]
Turn the Ballot Over
OFFICIAL BALLOT GENERAL ELECTION Precinct Officials Marion County Initials MARION COUNTY, STATE OF IOWA Commissioner of Elections TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2006 CITY OF HARVEY INSTRUCTIONS TO VOTERS: To vote, darken the oval(s) completely next to your choice, like this: . STRAIGHT PARTY VOTING:To vote for all candidates from a single party, fill in the oval next to the party name. Not all parties have nominated candidates for all offices. Marking a straight party vote does not include votes for nonpartisan offices, judges or questions. WRITE-IN: To vote for a write-in candidate, write the person's name on the line provided and darken the oval. JUDGES: The judicial ballot appears on the back of this ballot, beginning in the middle of the page. ABBREVIATIONS STATE OFFICES FOR SECRETARY OF FOR COUNTY ATTORNEY DEMOCRATIC PARTY DEM AGRICULTURE FOR GOVERNOR AND (Vote for no more than ONE) REPUBLICAN PARTY REP LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR (Vote for no more than ONE) IOWA GREEN PARTY IGP DENISE O'BRIEN DEM TERRY E. RACHELS DEM LIBERTARIAN PARTY LIB (Vote for no more than ONE TEAM) SOCIALIST WORKERS CHET CULVER DEM BILL NORTHEY REP (Write-in vote, if any) PARTY SWP PATTY JUDGE NOMINATED BY PETITION NBP (Write-in vote, if any) PARTISAN OFFICES JIM NUSSLE REP FOR ATTORNEY GENERAL STRAIGHT PARTY VOTING BOB VANDER PLAATS (Vote for no more than ONE) DEMOCRATIC PARTY DEM WENDY S. BARTH IGP TOM MILLER DEM RICHARD L. JOHNSON (Write-in vote, if any) REPUBLICAN PARTY REP KEVIN LITTEN LIB FOR STATE REPRESENTATIVE MARK NELSON DISTRICT 072 (Vote for no more than ONE) SOCIALIST WORKERS SWP MARY J.
[Show full text]
Following Jesus Christians Debate the Best Way to Be the Church and Reach Our World
SPRING 2012 Northwestern College MagazinetheClassic Following Jesus Christians debate the best way to be the church and reach our world Also Republican Power Broker Bob Vander Plaats The Wedding Gift Three-peat 14Mel Babcock, Val Kleinjan and Jessica Wedel (from left) Contents Classic People celebrate the Raiders’ third consecutive national title— Editor Door Man Duane Beeson Head toward the cafeteria, chapel or RSC, and there’s a good and fifth overall. 712-707-7116 13 chance freshman Paul McCleary will get the door [email protected] 18 for you. Staff Writers Carrie (Odell ’01) Anderson Changing Church Duane Beeson Concern about reaching today’s postmodern generation Anita Cirulis 18 has resulted in a critique of evangelicalism and a new Tamara Fynaardt commitment to the message of the gospel. Amanda Kundert Political Power Broker Designers Ryan James When Rick Santorum won the Iowa Republican caucuses 26 in January—and was elevated to the status of Mitt Roy Trevino John Vander Stelt ‘83 Romney’s main competition—Bob Vander Plaats deserved some of the credit. Web Designer Dan Robinson ‘01 The Wedding Gift The Classic is published three times a Natsuki Nagakawa became so close to her Northwestern year—in April, July and November— 27 host family that she paid for their trip to her wedding in for alumni and friends of Northwest- ern College. So named because it Japan. served what was then known as the Northwestern Classical Academy, the Classic was the school’s first student newspaper, begun in 1891. Departments It has been an alumni publication since 1930. 2 Zwemer View Send correspondence or address On the Web changes to the Classic, Northwestern 3 In Box College, 101 7th Street SW, Orange City, IA 51041-1996 or classic@ Your Turn nwciowa.edu.
[Show full text]
The Politicization of Judicial Elections and Its Effect on Judicial Independence∗
THE POLITICIZATION OF JUDICIAL ELECTIONS AND ITS EFFECT ON JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE∗ MATTHEW W. GREEN JR., SUSAN J. BECKER, HON. MARSHA K. TERNUS, CAMILLA B. TAYLOR, AND DANIEL P. TOKAJI I. JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND LGBT RIGHTS: AN UNEASY MARRIAGE MATTHEW W. GREEN JR. .................................................... 462 A. Introduction ................................................................. 462 B. Judicial Independence ................................................. 464 C. Marriage Equality ....................................................... 465 II. AN OVERVIEW OF LGBT EQUALITY AND JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE SUSAN J. BECKER ................................................................ 466 A Introduction ................................................................ 466 1. Brief History of the LGBT Equality Movement .. 466 2. Current Status of LGBT Equality in the United States ......................................................... 468 3. California’s Marriage Wars .................................. 468 4. Same-Sex Marriage Prohibitions in Other States ... 469 B. Judicial Independence Overview ................................. 470 1. Definition and Virtues of Judicial Independence ........................................................ 470 2. The Formalism-Realism Debate ........................... 471 C. Inherent Impediments to Judicial Independence ......... 472 1. Choosing the Applicable Law .............................. 472 2. Intentional Vagueness of Legal Rules and Standards .............................................................
[Show full text]
The State of Marriage Equality in America
The State of Marriage Equality in America April 2015 Executive Summary Squarely before the United States Supreme Court this Term is the important issue of marriage equality. Meanwhile, absent authoritative judicial guidance on the subject, the legislatures of many states (Maryland among them) continue to exercise their traditional authority to shape the institution of marriage. Many contend that principles of federalism require states to do this without interference from federal courts. Others say — including, today, numerous states that ordinarily would defend the scope of their powers — that states have sometimes been poor custodians of the rights of minorities. Regrettably, this has been especially true in our Nation’s history when the deliberative process has been contaminated by widespread prejudice and hate. In those contexts and on those occasions, it has been the Supreme Court that has interceded to protect unpopular groups. And just as judicial restraint in the ordinary case has been a vital, venerated part of the Supreme Court’s noble history, when necessary, so too have those now-revered interventions. In order to better gauge whether states can be relied upon to safeguard the rights of gays and lesbians* — i.e., whether debates in this arena reflect the loud and vigorous discord expected of a pluralistic democracy, or whether the political process has been irreparably corrupted by fear, ignorance, and misinformation — this Report, The State of Marriage Equality in America, examines the experiences of states that have both outlawed and allowed same-sex marriage. The findings of this survey are deeply troubling and inspire no confidence. In the end, the Report concludes that the pressing question of marriage equality cannot be adequately addressed by a state political process that has been systematically degraded by animus directed at gays and lesbians.
[Show full text]
IOWA 2012 Todd E. Pettys* on April 3, 2009, the Iowa Supreme Court's
RETENTION REDUX: IOWA 2012 Todd E. Pettys* I. INTRODUCTION On April 3, 2009, the Iowa Supreme Court's seven members ruled unanimously in Varnum v. Brien' that the state's statutory ban on same-sex marriage violated the equality clause of the Iowa Constitution. Nineteen months later, three of those justices-Chief Justice Marsha Ternus, Justice Michael Streit, and Justice David Baker-lost their jobs when Iowa voters denied their bids for retention.2 It was a remarkable victory for social conservatives and their leaders, including Iowa for Freedom (an anti-retention organization founded by Iowa businessman Bob Vander Plaats, who had recently suffered his third defeat in a Republican gubernatorial primary),3 the * H. Blair and Joan V. White Chair in Civil Litigation, University of Iowa College of Law. Thanks to Ryan Koopmans and Caroline Sheerin for their helpful comments on an earlier draft and to Eric Bigley for his research assistance. 1. 763 N.W.2d 862, 872 (Iowa 2009) ("[W]e hold the Iowa marriage statute violates the equal protection clause of the Iowa Constitution."); Iowa Const. art. I, § 6 ("All laws of a general nature shall have a uniform operation; the general assembly shall not grant to any citizen, or class of citizens, privileges or immunities, which, upon the same terms shall not equally belong to all citizens."); Iowa Code § 595.2(1) (2009) ("Only a marriage between a male and a female is valid."). 2. See Grant Schulte, Iowans Dismiss Three Justices, Des Moines Reg. Al (Nov. 3, 2010). In Iowa, justices are appointed by the governor from a list of names supplied by the state's judicial nominating commission, but then are required to stand for a retention vote after a short initial period of service and every eight years thereafter.
[Show full text]
The Politicization of Judicial Elections and Its Effect on Judicial Independence, 60 Clev
Cleveland State University EngagedScholarship@CSU Cleveland State Law Review Law Journals 2012 The olitP icization of Judicial Elections and Its Effect on Judicial Independence Matthew .W Green Jr. Cleveland State University, [email protected] Susan J. Becker Cleveland State University, [email protected] Marsha K. Ternus Camilla B. Taylor Follow this and additional works at: http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev Part of the Judges Commons, Politics Commons, and the Sexuality and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Matthew W. Green Jr., Susan J. Becker, Marsha K. Ternus, and Camilla B. Taylor, The Politicization of Judicial Elections and Its Effect on Judicial Independence, 60 Clev. St. L. Rev. 461 (2012) available at http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol60/iss2/6 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at EngagedScholarship@CSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Cleveland State Law Review by an authorized administrator of EngagedScholarship@CSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE POLITICIZATION OF JUDICIAL ELECTIONS AND ITS EFFECT ON JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE∗ MATTHEW W. GREEN JR., SUSAN J. BECKER, HON. MARSHA K. TERNUS, CAMILLA B. TAYLOR, AND DANIEL P. TOKAJI I. JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE AND LGBT RIGHTS: AN UNEASY MARRIAGE MATTHEW W. GREEN JR. .................................................... 462 A. Introduction ................................................................. 462 B. Judicial Independence ................................................
[Show full text]