334 Maidstone to Sheerness Via Sittingbourne - Valid from Sunday, June 6, 2021 to Sunday, September 19, 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Maidstone Green Party Response to Maidstone Borough Council's
Maidstone Green Party Response to Maidstone Borough Council’s consultation on the Local Plan Review Preferred Approaches Firstly, we are deeply concerned about the timing and brevity of this consultation. It was launched to run from before the date of the end of the national lockdown for covid, i.e. 1st December 2020 however as the council is aware, Maidstone immediately entered Tier 3 with the tightest restriction. This is very likely to reduce knowledge of and access to the consultation and therefore the process is challengeable. Furthermore the consultation in being run in the three week run up to Christmas, a generally accepted poor time for consultation and a time that will further suppress engagement by the public. We are concerned that this poorly timed consultation will not reasonable standards of engagement, particularly from hard to reach groups, and is therefore flawed. With regard to the Local Plan Review Preferred Approaches (LPRPA) itself: Climate change and the ecological emergency Given that this is the largest emergency facing humanity and that the council has acknowledged this, it is surprising that the LPRPA does not frame itself around carbon / pollution reduction, resource reduction, and restoration / mitigation. Climate change is paid lip service to only and it is clear that the council has not understood the impacts or requirements. Policy SP15(C) Climate Change commences with the words “Adopt a strategy for growth” demonstrating the council’s fundamental lack of understanding about the connection between the environment and the economy. The building of an average home uses 100t CO2e. The LPRPA requires that 18,210 homes are built, this will require the emission of 1.8 million tonnes of CO2e which would not be in keeping with the council’s aim to be carbon neutral or that climate change is an emergency. -
Document in Detail: Diocese of Canterbury Medieval Fragments
Issue 10, Summer 2018 Kent Archives is set for a busy summer. In this edition of our newsletter we introduce you to our joint project with Findmypast to digitise our parish register collection. The image in our header is from the first Cranbrook parish composite register [ref. P100/1/A/1], and is just one of the thousands of registers that will be digitised. We are also in the middle of transferring the remaining historic records of the Diocese of Canterbury from Canterbury Cathedral Archives to the Kent History and Library Centre to join its probate records, which have been held by Kent Archives since 1946. At the same time, archive cataloguing of one of Maidstone’s major papermaking collections is nearly complete; further World War I commemorative activities are underway; and work continues on the Catalogue Transfer Project and Manorial Documents Register Project for Kent. Document in Detail: Diocese of Canterbury Medieval Fragments [DCb/PRC/50/5] Mark Ballard, Archive Service Officer Among many other records of great value within the records of Canterbury Diocese are the ‘medieval fragments’ [DCb/PRC/49 and DCb/PRC/50], which in the post-Reformation period came to be used as covers, or ‘end-parchments’, for the probate registers. If we can judge by the dates of the act books and wills and inventories registers they covered, this recycling became a habit during the episcopate of Archbishop Matthew Parker (1559-1575). It is perhaps ironic that at precisely the time that Thomas Tallis and William Byrd, probably both closet Roman Catholics, were still being employed to write motets for the Chapel Royal, such disrespectful treatment was being accorded at Canterbury to their medieval predecessors. -
Kent Archæological Society Library
http://kentarchaeology.org.uk/research/archaeologia-cantiana/ Kent Archaeological Society is a registered charity number 223382 © 2017 Kent Archaeological Society KENT ARCILEOLOGICAL SOCIETY LIBRARY SIXTH INSTALMENT HUSSEY MS. NOTES THE MS. notes made by Arthur Hussey were given to the Society after his death in 1941. An index exists in the library, almost certainly made by the late B. W. Swithinbank. This is printed as it stands. The number given is that of the bundle or box. D.B.K. F = Family. Acol, see Woodchurch-in-Thanet. Benenden, 12; see also Petham. Ady F, see Eddye. Bethersden, 2; see also Charing Deanery. Alcock F, 11. Betteshanger, 1; see also Kent: Non- Aldington near Lympne, 1. jurors. Aldington near Thurnham, 10. Biddend.en, 10; see also Charing Allcham, 1. Deanery. Appledore, 6; see also Kent: Hermitages. Bigge F, 17. Apulderfield in Cudham, 8. Bigod F, 11. Apulderfield F, 4; see also Whitfield and Bilsington, 7; see also Belgar. Cudham. Birchington, 7; see also Kent: Chantries Ash-next-Fawkham, see Kent: Holy and Woodchurch-in-Thanet. Wells. Bishopsbourne, 2. Ash-next-Sandwich, 7. Blackmanstone, 9. Ashford, 9. Bobbing, 11. at Lese F, 12. Bockingfold, see Brenchley. Aucher F, 4; see also Mottinden. Boleyn F, see Hever. Austen F (Austyn, Astyn), 13; see also Bonnington, 3; see also Goodneston- St. Peter's in Tha,net. next-Wingham and Kent: Chantries. Axon F, 13. Bonner F (Bonnar), 10. Aylesford, 11. Boorman F, 13. Borden, 11. BacIlesmere F, 7; see also Chartham. Boreman F, see Boorman. Baclmangore, see Apulderfield F. Boughton Aluph, see Soalcham. Ballard F, see Chartham. -
ELECTORAL REVIEW of SWALE Final Recommendations for Ward
SHEET 2, MAP 2 Proposed ward boundaries in the north of the Isle of Sheppey THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT BOUNDARY COMMISSION FOR ENGLAND ELECTORAL REVIEW OF SWALE Final recommendations for ward boundaries in the borough of Swale August 2012 Sheet 2 of 3 This map is based upon Ordnance Survey material with the permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of the Controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office © Crown copyright. Unauthorised reproduction infringes Crown copyright and may lead to prosecution or civil proceedings. The Local Government Boundary Commission for England GD100049926 2012. KEY BOROUGH COUNCIL BOUNDARY PROPOSED WARD BOUNDARY PARISH BOUNDARY PROPOSED PARISH WARD BOUNDARY SHEERNESS WARD PROPOSED WARD NAME EASTCHURCH CP PARISH NAME MINSTER EAST PARISH WARD PROPOSED PARISH WARD NAME Sheerness Hole Vehicle and Passenger Garrison Point Ferry Terminal Fort COINCIDENT BOUNDARIES ARE SHOWN AS THIN COLOURED LINES SUPERIMPOSED OVER WIDER ONES. y a w d e M r e v i Boat G R AR Basin RIS ON RO AD Scale : 1cm = 0.07600 km Grid interval 1km Es pla na de Sheerness Harbour Estate EET HIGH STR Sheppey College T Trading Estate B S RI H DG AC E R E OA B IN ROAD D BAS GREAT BLUE Station TOWN HIG H S Y TR WA EE OAD AY T BR E W L Car Park IEL BR Catamaran C e m e Yacht Club t e y r S E s Steel Works T A e P R in E ALMA ST G L M I h P N E g I R u Y L I Playing Field ro SHEERNESS T o S L D R b M E Y D n A A A T O e A N e R V R O O E A u Sheerness Harbour Estate E N R Q IN O R E D d IU n E A A R a M A nt P D M R T i A T L o Sea Cadets R S P S W D T A MARINE -
208B Maidstone Road, Rochester, Kent, ME1 3LP Proposal: Change of Use From
MC/16/4423 Date Received: 28 October, 2016 Location: 208b Maidstone Road, Rochester, Kent, ME1 3LP Proposal: Change of use from retail (Class A1) to sandwich bar (Class A3) Applicant: Mr R Deol Ward Rochester West Case Officer Alison Webster Contact Number 01634 331700 _________________________________________________________________ Recommendation of Officers to the Planning Committee, to be considered and determined by the Planning Committee at a meeting to be held on 14 December 2016. Recommendation - Refusal The additional traffic and on street parking generated by the proposed development would have an adverse impact on the amenity of the occupiers of nearby premises. As such the proposals would conflict with Policies BNE2 and R18 of the Medway Local Plan 2003. For the reasons for this recommendation for refusal please see Planning Appraisal Section and Conclusions at the end of this report. Proposal This application proposes to change the use of the ground floor of the premises from retail (Class A1) to sandwich bar (Class A3). Relevant Planning History MC/15/0074 Construction of a two storey end of terraced building to accommodate two self-contained flats with associated parking to front. Decision Approval With Conditions Decided 05/05/2015 MC/13/1176 Construction of a two storey extension to side to accommodate retail unit (Class A1) with residential accommodation above (Resubmission of MC/12/3026) Decision Approval With Conditions Decided 15/07/2013 MC/10/2598 Construction of a part two/part single storey attached building for -
Kent. Bui 861
TRADES DIRECTORY.] KENT. BUI 861 Gann & Co. Tankerton works, Tankerton, Hammond WilHam, 49 Kirkdale road, Hudson Thos. 47 Forge st. Southborough Whitstable Tunbridge Wells IHughes E. F. Broadway, Sheerness·on-Sea. Garland William, 28 Cheriton rd. Folkestn Hancock G. 9 Dover st. Sittingbourne Hughes John, jun. 62 Canterbury road, Garlick Edward John & Co. High street, Harrow Edwin, Shalmsford st. Canterbury Whitstable Welling S.O Harmer Richard, 3 Crown lane. BromIey Hughes J. E. 107 Beaver rd. Sth. Ashford Garratt Frederick O. 108 Ravenscroft Hams BrOB. 112 Northgate st. Canterbury Hunn J. J. 60 Upper Fant rd. Maidstone road, Beckenham Hams John & Charles, 34 Kingswood Runt E. C. Montfortrd. Strood, Rochester Gascoyne W. 115 High street, Beckenham road, New Brompton Hutehings James, 37 Hayes rd. Bromley Gaskin George, Seymourplace, Canterbury Hams A. 6 Edward st. Sheerness-on-Sea Hutson Edmund Fraderick, Sturry road Gates Frederick James, Herne & Lower Hams E. 30 Marine par. Sheerness-on-Sea. &:; Pound lane, Canterbury Herne, Canterbury Hams H. 45 Gillingham road, Gilling. IgguIden Stephen,Cedar ho. Wrotham S.O Gates George, 89 Blenheim road, Deal ham, Chatham Ingarfill Alfred, Knockholt, Sevenoaks Gates George, High street, Frindsbury; HamsH. Graspan, Nelsonrd. NewBrmptn Idge Thomas, 94 Beckenham la. BromIey & Canal road, Strood, Rochester Hams James Herbert, 20 Constitution Ingleton Alfred Sneller, Richmond street Gates William, Clifton grove, Arthur road, Luton, Chatham &:; William street, Herne Bay street, Gravesend Hams William Thomas, Alpha road, J ackson & Quier, 5 Forbes rd. Faversham Gay George, 31 Dover road, Northfleet Birchington R.S.O Jacob Frederick, Avenue rd. Beckenham Gentry Frederick Thomas, 44 Broad street Harris John, 8 Brunswick sq. -
B2246 Hermitage Lane/A26 Tonbridge Road Project PDF 722 KB
Maidstone Joint Transportation Board 14 October 2020 B2246 Hermitage Lane/A26 Tonbridge Road Project Decision Making Authority Kent County Council/Maidstone Borough Council Lead Director Simon Jones Lead Head of Service Tim Read Lead Officer and Report Russell Boorman/Benjamin Cuddihee Author Wards and County Divisions Maidstone Borough including Tonbridge & affected Malling Which Member(s) requested Councillor Rob Bird this report? This report makes the following recommendations: REPORT TO BE NOTED. Timetable Meeting Date Maidstone Joint Transportation Board 14 October 2020 B2246 Hermitage Lane/A26 Tonbridge Road Project 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.1 This report provides an update in respect of the proposed junction improvements contained within the A26 Tonbridge Road and B2246 Hermitage Lane project. 1.2 The road project was previously part of the Maidstone Integrated Transport Package (MITP) but was removed due to the lack of demonstratable benefit and good value for money. The project was then taken forward by a Member led working group with the aim of producing a scheme to utilise the available S106 funding. 1.3 The scheme was previously brought before the Joint Transportation Board in July 2019. Where following a comprehensive and thorough optioneering exercise, it was recommended that the scheme would not be progressed as the design options put forward did not sufficiently address the congestion experienced at the junction or posed a safety risk in terms of operation. A table outlining the previous options and the reasons for being discounted are shown in table 1. 1.4 The member led working group consisting of KCC Local Members, Maidstone Councillors and KCC officers have continued to work together to produce a design that all believe will provide the necessary capacity required to alleviate the current congestion issues experienced at the junction. -
Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre
GB 1204 Ch 46 Medway Archives and Local Studies Centre This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National Register of Archives digitisation project NRA 22324 ! National Arc F Kent Archives Offic Ch 46 Watts Charity MSS., 1579-1972 Deposited by Mr. Chinnery, Clerk to the Charity, Rochester, 1st May 1974, and 5th February, 1976 Catalogued by Alison Revell, June 1978 INTRODUCTION For information concerning the establishment of Watts's Charity, under Richard Watts of Rochester's will, in 1579 and its subsequent history, The Report of Commissioners for Inquiring Concerning Charities - Kent, 1815-39 Pp. 504-9, provides most of the basic facts. Other Rochester Charities are dealt with in the same Report (see pages 55-57, and 500-513). The Report also deals with various early legal cases concerning the Charity, and the uses to which its funds should be put, most notably the cases of the parishes of St. Margaret 's Rochester, and Strood, against the parishioners of St. Nicholas in 1680, and of the parishioners of Chatham against the Trustees of the Charity in 1808 (see L1-4B in this catalogue). The original will of Richard Watts, drawn up in 1579 and proved in the following year in the Consistory Court of Rochester, is kept in this Office under the catalogue mark, DRb PW12 (1579), with a registered copy in the volume of registered wills, DRb PWr 16 (ffl05-107). A copy is also catalogued in this collection as Ch46 L1A. Further Watts Charity material is found in the Dean and Chapter of Rochester MSS, under the KAO catalogue number, DRc Cl/1-65, and consists mainly of accounts of the Providers of the Poor of Rochester, between the years 1699 and 1819. -
Landscape Assessment of Kent 2004
CHILHAM: STOUR VALLEY Location map: CHILHAMCHARACTER AREA DESCRIPTION North of Bilting, the Stour Valley becomes increasingly enclosed. The rolling sides of the valley support large arable fields in the east, while sweeps of parkland belonging to Godmersham Park and Chilham Castle cover most of the western slopes. On either side of the valley, dense woodland dominate the skyline and a number of substantial shaws and plantations on the lower slopes reflect the importance of game cover in this area. On the valley bottom, the river is picked out in places by waterside alders and occasional willows. The railway line is obscured for much of its length by trees. STOUR VALLEY Chilham lies within the larger character area of the Stour Valley within the Kent Downs AONB. The Great Stour is the most easterly of the three rivers cutting through the Downs. Like the Darent and the Medway, it too provided an early access route into the heart of Kent and formed an ancient focus for settlement. Today the Stour Valley is highly valued for the quality of its landscape, especially by the considerable numbers of walkers who follow the Stour Valley Walk or the North Downs Way National Trail. Despite its proximity to both Canterbury and Ashford, the Stour Valley retains a strong rural identity. Enclosed by steep scarps on both sides, with dense woodlands on the upper slopes, the valley is dominated by intensively farmed arable fields interspersed by broad sweeps of mature parkland. Unusually, there are no electricity pylons cluttering the views across the valley. North of Bilting, the river flows through a narrow, pastoral floodplain, dotted with trees such as willow and alder and drained by small ditches. -
Retail Park Ashford, TN24 0SG
Ashford Retail Park Ashford, TN24 0SG Open A1 (with restrictions) Ashford Retail Park Ashford, TN24 0SG Sheerness Dartford Grays Tilbury GRAVESEND Minster MARGATE A2 Swanley A28 ROCHESTER A249 Herne Bay Whitstable GILLINGHAM A299 M25 CHATHAM Sittingbourne Ramsgate M20 A228 Faversham A28 A299 A256 M2 A249 M26 Canterbury MAIDSTONE M25 A28 Sevenoaks Deal A2 Oxted M20 A256 A21 Tonbridge A229 A26 Ashford ROYAL DOVER TUNBRIDGE WELLS A20 FOLKESTONE A229 A2070 Hythe Crowborough A259 A26 A21 A259 Uckfield Ashford Retail Park Ashford, TN24 0SG A20 A20 7 A28 8 Repton Park South A2070 M20 A292 A2042 6 Ashford A292 West Hinxhill Brabourne Ashford International A2042 Willesborough 2 5 4 Key. 3 A2070 1 Ashford Retail Park A2042 1 M20 2 Tesco 3 Asda Sevington 4 McArthurGlen Factory Outlet A2042 A2070 9 5 Norman Road Retail Park (B&Q) Brabourne 6 Matalan Lees 7 John Lewis at Home A20 A2070 Mersham 8 Warren Retail Park (Sainsbury’s) 9 Crest Nicholson – Finberry Kingsnorth Housing Development A20 A2070 Ashford Retail Park Ashford, TN24 0SG Crest Nicholson Finberry Housing Development A292 Ashford Retail Park M20 A2070 Junction 10 Ashford Retail Park Ashford, TN24 0SG Canterbury Key Facts Key Demographic & Spending Data Accessible location 10 mins 20 mins Located two miles south east of Ashford town Resident Population 44,081 197,368 centre and only half a mile from the M20. Resident Households 18,082 83,703 Family/Pre Family Households 9,277 39,297 M20 Rapid growth Total Non-Grocery Market Size £173m £762m Over 31,000 new homes are being built, Grocery Market Size £42m £182m 28,000 new jobs are being created, and a Ashford £25m college campus. -
Isle of Sheppey Ffiirrsstt Wwoorrlldd Wwaarr Walking Trails
Isle of Sheppey FFiirrsstt WWoorrlldd WWaarr Walking Trails RReevveeaalliinngg tthhee hhiissttoorryy ooff llooccaall ppeeooppllee,, ppllaacceess aanndd eevveennttss This trail was developed by Barbara Twiselton and Blue Town Heritage Centre www.kentww1.com ©kentww1.com 2017 Available for use under Creative Commons Licence for non-commercial use only Page 1 of 19 Contents Page 2 Trail information, travel, parking and facilities information and walking advice disclaimer. Page 3 Glossary and Burgundy Trail Introductions Page 4–9 Sheerness Burgundy Trail Page 10 Blue Town Blue Trail Introduction Page 11-15 Blue Town Blue Trail Page 16 Places Nearby Page 17 Quiz Page 18-19 Maps All trails are accessible digitally at www.kentww1 on 100 miles tab, where you will find a link to an app. Travel information By car: Starting point of Burgundy: ME12 1RJ Starting point of Blue: ME12 1RW By Train: Sheerness Railway Station is a point on the Burgundy trail and is close to the start of the trail. Parking: Free parking along High Street Blue Town, Tesco’s car park (ME12 1RH) and Beach Street Car Park (ME12) Places of rest / Facilities: Various cafes and pubs are located around Sheerness town centre and close to the start of the Burgundy Trail. Walking Advice – Health and Safety Some of the locations shown on our maps can be dangerous, particularly coastal areas where the incoming tide may cut off routes, and cliff edges may be prone to collapse. Always check local safety information before travelling, and use caution when visiting. Our maps and points of interest are provided for historical information only. -
Development Brief Abbott Laboratories Limited Land East Of
Development Brief Abbott Laboratories Limited Land East of Whiteway Road Queenborough, Isle of Sheppey January 2003 Terence O’Rourke & TPK Consulting Development Brief Abbott Laboratories Limited Land East of Whiteway Road Queenborough, Isle of Sheppey Contents 6 Planning and Environmental Appraisal of Proposed Development ● Natural heritage and water 1 Introduction ● Social, community and economic effects ● Noise 2 Planning Policy Context ● Air quality ● Land and contamination ● Cultural heritage 3 Site Appraisal ● Traffic ● The site and its context ● Planning and Environmental Constraints ● Natural heritage 7 Nature Conservation Mitigation and ● Water Compensation Strategy ● Social, community and economic effects ● Option 1 - Chetney Marshes ● Noise ● Option 2 - Land east of Brielle Way ● Air quality ● Option 3 - South Marshes ● Land and contamination ● Option 4 - On-site mitigation ● Cultural heritage ● The Chosen Option ● Landscape 4 Background to the Proposal Appendix 1 – Swale Local Plan Policies ● Global perspective ● UK perspective ● Abbott Laboratories past development in the UK Appendix 2 – Noise survey ● Reasons for the required expansion ● Development of the existing west site Appendix 3 - Air quality report ● Expansion at the proposed development east site Appendix 4 - Landscape baseline report 5 Proposed Development ● Option (i) Develop along Whiteway Road Appendix 5 - Draft travel plan ● Option (ii) Develop the southern part of the site ● Option (iii) Develop the whole site Appendix 6 - Site management plan ● The chosen