DOCSLIB.ORG

{PDF EPUB} Propaganda and the Public Mind by Noam Chomsky ISBN 13: 9781608464029

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
{PDF EPUB} Propaganda and the Public Mind by Noam Chomsky ISBN 13: 9781608464029 Read Ebook {PDF EPUB} Propaganda and the Public Mind by Noam Chomsky ISBN 13: 9781608464029. Renowned interviewer David Barsamian showcases his unique access to Chomsky’s thinking on a number of topics of contemporary and historical import. Chomsky offers insights into the institutions that shape the public mind in the service of power and profit. In an interview conducted after the important November 1999 Battle in Seattle,” Chomsky discusses prospects for building a movement to challenge corporate domination of the media, the environment, and even our private lives. Whether discussing U.S. military escalation in Colombia, attacks on Social Security, or growing inequality worldwide, Chomsky shows how ordinary people, if they work together, have the power to make meaningful change. "synopsis" may belong to another edition of this title. Noam Chomsky is Institute Professor in the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston. A member of the American Academy of Science, he has published widely in both linguistics and current affairs. His books include At War with Asia, Towards a New Cold War, Fateful Triangle: The U. S., Israel and the Palestinians, Necessary Illusions, Hegemony or Survival, Deterring Democracy, Failed States: The Abuse of Power and the Assault on Democracy and Manufacturing Consent: The Political Economy of the Mass Media. David Barsamian is an Armenian-American radio broadcaster, writer, and the founder and director of Alternative Radio, the Boulder, Colorado- based syndicated weekly talk program heard on some 150 radio stations in various countries. In Propaganda and the Public Mind , we have unique insight into Noam Chomsky's decades of penetrating analyses . drawn together in one slender volume by a brilliant radio interviewer, David Barsamian." ―Ben Bagdikian, The Media Monopoly. "To anyone who wonders if ideas, information, and activism can make a profound difference in the twenty-first century, I say: 'Read this book.' Propaganda and the Public Mind challenges us to think more independently and more deeply about the human consequences of power and privilege." ―Norman Solomon, The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media. In Propaganda and the Public Mind , we have unique insight into Noam Chomsky's decades of penetrating analyses . drawn together in one slender volume by a brilliant radio interviewer, David Barsamian." Ben Bagdikian, The Media Monopoly. "To anyone who wonders if ideas, information, and activism can make a profound difference in the twenty-first century, I say: 'Read this book.' Propaganda and the Public Mind challenges us to think more independently and more deeply about the human consequences of power and privilege." Norman Solomon, The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media. Selections. p17 The Reagan administration was the most anti-market administration in modern American history. They virtually doubled barriers to imports in order to try to save U.S. industry. If they had opened up markets in the 1980s, superior Japanese products would have flooded the automotive industry, steel, and semiconductors. The main industrial base of the U.S. would have been wiped out. So the Reagan administration just barred imports. What’s more, it poured public funds into industry. p19 Anyone who has had any dealings with children knows that they’re curious and creative. They want to explore things and figure out what’s happening. A good bit of schooling is an effort to drive this out of them and to fit them into a mold, make them behave, stop thinking, not cause any trouble. It goes right from kindergarten up … People are supposed to be obedient producers, do what they’re told, and the rest of your life is supposed to be passive consuming. Don’t think about things. Don’t know about things … Just do what you’re told, pay attention to something else and maximize your consumption. That’s the role of the public. p38 When the world’s only superpower [the US], which has essentially a monopoly of force, announces openly, We will use force and violence as we choose and if you don’t like it get out of the way, there’s a reason why that should frighten people. p57 The U.S. achieved its major war ends. Its major concern was to ensure that Vietnam would not take off on a course of independent development that, horror of horrors, might even be a model for others, what is called a virus. That goal was achieved. When you’ve destroyed a country, it’s not going to follow a course of independence. And it’s certainly going to be no model for others. … But the U.S. didn’t achieve its highest aim. It didn’t turn Vietnam into the Philippines, a colony. So that’s called a loss. But in fact it achieved its major aim. And now we go home. The attitude has been quite astonishing. Jimmy Carter, for example, in what must count as one of the most incredible comments from any head of state anywhere, told a news conference that we owe no debt to Vietnam because "the destruction was mutual". p163 States are not moral agents. They do not engage in the use of force for humanitarian ends, although that’s always claimed. p166 … Bertrand Russell, who by any standard is one of the leading intellectual figures of the twentieth century. He was one of the very few leading intellectuals who opposed World War I. He was vilified, and in fact ended up in jail, like his counterparts in Germany. From the 1950s, particularly in the United States, he was bitterly denounced and attacked as a crazy old man who was anti-American. Why? Because he was standing up for the principles that other intellectuals also accepted, but he was doing something about it. For example, Bertrand Russell and Albert Einstein, to take another leading intellectual, essentially agreed on things like nuclear weapons. They thought nuclear weapons might well destroy the species. They signed similar statements, I think even joint statements. But then they reacted differently. Einstein went back to his office in the Institute for Advanced Studies at Princeton and worked on unified field theories. Russell, on the other hand, went out in the streets. He was part of the demonstrations against nuclear weapons. He became quite active in opposing the Vietnam War early on, at a time when there was virtually no public opposition. He also tried to do something about that, including demonstrations and organizing a tribunal. So he was bitterly denounced. On the other hand, Einstein was a saintly figure. They essentially had the same positions, but Einstein didn’t rattle too many cages. That’s pretty common. Russell was viciously attacked in the New York Times and by Secretary of State Dean Rusk and others in the 196Os. He wasn’t counted as a public intellectual, just a crazy old man. There’s a good book on this called Bertrand Russell’s America. p167 A standard technique of belief formation is to do something in your own interest and then to construct a framework in which that’s the right thing to do. p169 … if you want to be praised and have your books reviewed and told how brilliant you are and get great jobs, it’s not advisable to be a dissident. It’s not impossible, and in fact the system has enough looseness in it so that it can be done, but it is not easy. Both of us can name plenty of people who were simply cut out of the system because their work was too honest. That blocks access. Propaganda and the Public Mind by Noam Chomsky. Noam Chomsky and David Barsamian. Haymarket Books (2015, world English rights) Trade Paper • ISBN-13: 9781608464029 • US $18 • 5 1/8 in x 8 1/4 in • 256 pgs. ABOUT THE BOOK: Renowned interviewer David Barsamian showcases his unique access to Chomsky’s thinking on a number of topics of contemporary and historical import. Chomsky offers insights into the institutions that shape the public mind in the service of power and profit. In an interview conducted after the important November 1999 “Battle in Seattle,” Chomsky discusses prospects for building a movement to challenge corporate domination of the media, the environment, and even our private lives. Whether discussing US military escalation in Colombia, attacks on Social Security, or growing inequality worldwide, Chomsky shows how ordinary people, if they work together, have the power to make meaningful change. PRAISE: In Propaganda and the Public Mind , we have unique insight into Noam Chomsky’s decades of penetrating analyses . drawn together in one slender volume by a brilliant radio interviewer, David Barsamian.” Ben Bagdikian , The Media Monopoly. “To anyone who wonders if ideas, information, and activism can make a profound difference in the twenty-first century, I say: ‘Read this book.’ Propaganda and the Public Mind challenges us to think more independently and more deeply about the human consequences of power and privilege.” Norman Solomon , The Habits of Highly Deceptive Media. ABOUT THE AUTHORS: Noam Chomsky is Institute Professor (Emeritus) in the Department of Linguistics and Philosophy at MIT. His work is widely credited with having revolutionized the field of modern linguistics. He is the author of numerous best-selling political works, which have been translated into scores of languages worldwide. His latest books include the New York Times bestsellers Hegemony or Survival , Failed States , and Who Rules the World? Other recent books include What Kind of Creatures Are We? , as well as Power Systems , Occupy , Hopes and Prospects , and Masters of Mankind . Haymarket Books recently reissued twelve of his classic books with new introductions by the author. David Barsamian is one of America’s most tireless and wide-ranging investigative journalists.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Media Ownership Chart
    In 1983, 50 corporations controlled the vast majority of all news media in the U.S. At the time, Ben Bagdikian was called "alarmist" for pointing this out in his book, The Media Monopoly . In his 4th edition, published in 1992, he wrote "in the U.S., fewer than two dozen of these extraordinary creatures own and operate 90% of the mass media" -- controlling almost all of America's newspapers, magazines, TV and radio stations, books, records, movies, videos, wire services and photo agencies. He predicted then that eventually this number would fall to about half a dozen companies. This was greeted with skepticism at the time. When the 6th edition of The Media Monopoly was published in 2000, the number had fallen to six. Since then, there have been more mergers and the scope has expanded to include new media like the Internet market. More than 1 in 4 Internet users in the U.S. now log in with AOL Time-Warner, the world's largest media corporation. In 2004, Bagdikian's revised and expanded book, The New Media Monopoly , shows that only 5 huge corporations -- Time Warner, Disney, Murdoch's News Corporation, Bertelsmann of Germany, and Viacom (formerly CBS) -- now control most of the media industry in the U.S. General Electric's NBC is a close sixth. Who Controls the Media? Parent General Electric Time Warner The Walt Viacom News Company Disney Co. Corporation $100.5 billion $26.8 billion $18.9 billion 1998 revenues 1998 revenues $23 billion 1998 revenues $13 billion 1998 revenues 1998 revenues Background GE/NBC's ranks No.
    [Show full text]
  • Orientalism Once More (2003)
    Orientalism Once More (2003) Dr Edward Said Professor of Comparative Literature Columbia University Honorary Fellow Instiute of Social Studies Lecture delivered on the occasion of the awarding of the degree of Doctor Honoris Causa at the Academic Ceremony on the 50th Anniversary of the Institute of Social Studies, The Hague, The Netherlands, 21 May, 2003 Orientalism Once More (2003)* Nine years ago, in the spring of 1994, I wrote an afterword for Orientalism which, in trying to clarify what I believed I had and had not said, I stressed not only the many discussions that had opened up since my book appeared in 1978, but the ways in which a work about representations of “the Orient” lent themselves to increasing misrepresentation and misinterpretation. That I find myself feeling more ironic than irritated about that very same thing today is a sign of how much my age has crept up on me, along with the necessary diminutions in expectations and pedagogic zeal which usually frame the road to seniority. The recent death of my two main intellectual, political and personal mentors, Eqbal Ahmad and Ibrahim Abu-Lughod (who is one of this work’s dedicatees), has brought sadness and loss, as well as resignation and a certain stubborn will to go on. It isn’t at all a matter of being optimistic, but rather of continuing to have faith in the ongoing and literally unending process of emancipation and enlightenment that, in my opinion, frames and gives direction to the intellectual vocation. Nevertheless it is still a source of amazement to me that Orientalism continues to be discussed and translated all over the world, in thirty-six languages.
    [Show full text]
  • Daniel Ellsberg
    This document is made available through the declassification efforts and research of John Greenewald, Jr., creator of: The Black Vault The Black Vault is the largest online Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) document clearinghouse in the world. The research efforts here are responsible for the declassification of hundreds of thousands of pages released by the U.S. Government & Military. Discover the Truth at: http://www.theblackvault.com NATIONAL SECURITY AGENCY CENTRAL SECURITY SERVICE FORT GEORGE G. MEADE, MARYLAND 20755-6000 FOIA Case: 101038A 10 July 2017 JOHN GREENEWALD Dear Mr. Greenewald: This is our final response to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request of 6 March 2017 for Intellipedia entries on "PENTAGON PAPERS" and/ or "Daniel Ells berg" and/ or "Daniel Sheehan" as well as any search results pages. A copy of your request is enclosed. As stated in our initial response to you, dated 7 March 20 17, your request was assigned Case Number 101038. For purposes of this request and based on the information you provided in your letter, you are considered an "all other" requester. As such, you are allowed 2 hours of search and the duplication of 100 pages at no cost. There are no assessable fees for this request. Your request has been processed under the provisions of the FOIA. For your information, NSA provides a service of common concern for the Intelligence Community (IC) by serving as the executive agent for Intelink. As such, NSA provides technical services that enable users to access and share information with peers and stakeholders across the IC and DoD.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward W. Said: Resistance, Knowledge, Criticism
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Loughborough University Institutional Repository Edward W. Said: Resistance, Knowledge, Criticism by Mark Anthony Taylor A Doctoral Thesis Submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the award of Doctor of Philosophy of Loughborough University 17th October 2016 © Mark Taylor 2016 Abstract The prodigious output of the controversial Palestinian-American public intellectual, academic, and political activist, Edward W. Said (1935-2003), continues to polarize the academic, intellectual, and political worlds, not least because of the inflammatory nature of his relationship to the vexed issue of Israel/Palestine. It is a contention of this thesis that this polarization has resulted in what are often less than critical examinations of Said’s work. In short, because Said and his work remain relevant and influential, a new method of reading is required, one which not only takes account of Said’s resolutely secular, ‘worldly’ approach to the issue of knowledge and its production, but applies the same rigour and method to the Palestinian’s work in all its literary-critical, political, and personal varieties. This thesis attempts to meet that aim by testing Said’s oeuvre within the rubric of his stated ambition to create a critical location from which the production of ‘non-coercive knowledge’ was attainable. In the context of his opposition to political Zionism and wider Western imperialism, whether Said produced, or even intended to produce, knowledge that was ‘non-coercive’ is an extremely important question, and one that will be answered in this thesis. Formed by an introduction and three main chapters, the scope of the thesis is broad.
    [Show full text]
  • Howard Zinn BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Howard Zinn BIBLIOGRAPHY Voices of a People's History of the United States with Anthony Arnove, Seven Stories Press, (October 2004) The People Speak : American Voices, Some Famous, Some Little Known from Columbus to the Present (editor) Perennial Press (2004) Terrorism and War (Open Media Pamphlet Series) by Howard Zinn, Anthony Arnove (Editor). Harperperennial Library (2003) Artists In Times of War and Other Essays, Seven Stories Press; (2003) Passionate Declarations : Essays on War and Justice, Perennial Press; (2003) The Twentieth Century : A People's History Harperperennial Library; (2003) Back the Attack! Remixed War Propaganda by Micah Ian Wright, Howard Zinn (Commentary), Kurt Vonnegut (Introduction), Center for Constitutional Rights (Commentary). Seven Stories Press; (2003) The Power of Nonviolence: Writings by Advocates of Peace, Beacon Press (2002) Silencing Political Dissent: How Post-September 11 Anti-Terrorism Measures Threaten Our Civil Liberties, with Nancy Chang, Seven Stories Press (2002) Emma, South End Press (2002) Three Strikes: Miners, Musicians, Salesgirls, and the Fighting Spirit of Labor's Last Century with Kelley Robin D. G., Dana Frank, Beacon Press (2002) Howard Zinn on War and Other Means and Ends, Seven Stories Press (2001) The Future of History: Interviews With David Barsamian by Howard Zinn, David Barasamian. Common Courage Press (1999) Marx in SoHo: A Play on History, South End Press (1999) The Zinn Reader: Writings on Disobedience and Democracy Seven Stories Press (1997) Hiroshima: Breaking the Silence, Open Media (1995) You Can't Be Neutral on a Moving Train: A Personal History of Our Times Beacon Press; (1994) Failure to Quit; Reflections of an Optimistic Historian.
    [Show full text]
  • Public Service, Private Media: the Political Economy of The
    PUBLIC SERVICE, PRIVATE MEDIA: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE CABLE-SATELLITE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK (C-SPAN) by GLENN MICHAEL MORRIS A DISSERTATION Presented to the School of Journalism and Communication and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy June 2010 11 University of Oregon Graduate School Confirmation ofApproval and Acceptance of Dissertation prepared by: Glenn Morris Title: "Public Service, Private Media: The Political Economy ofthe Cable-Satellite Public Affairs Network (C-SPAN)." This dissertation has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment ofthe requirements for the degree in the Department of Journalism and Communication by: Janet Wasko, Chairperson, Journalism and Communication Carl Bybee, Member, Journalism and Communication Gabriela Martinez, Member, Journalism and Communication John Foster, Outside Member, Sociology and Richard Linton, Vice President for Research and Graduate Studies/Dean ofthe Graduate School for the University of Oregon. June 14,2010 Original approval signatures are on file with the Graduate School and the University of Oregon Libraries. 111 © 2010 Glenn Michael Morris IV An Abstract of the Dissertation of Glenn Michael Morris for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the School of Journalism and Communication to be taken June 2010 Title: PUBLIC SERVICE, PRIVATE MEDIA: THE POLITICAL ECONOMY OF THE CABLE-SATELLITE PUBLIC AFFAIRS NETWORK (C-SPAN) Approved: _ Dr. Janet Wasko The Satellite-Cable Public Affairs Network (C-SPAN) is the only television outlet in the U.S. providing Congressional coverage. Scholars have studied the network's public affairs content and unedited "gavel-to-gavel" style of production that distinguish it from other television channels.
    [Show full text]
  • Beacon Press and the Pentagon Papers
    BEACON PRESS AND THE PENTAGON PAPERS Beacon Press 25 Beacon Street Boston, Massachusetts 02108-2892 www.beacon.org Beacon Press books are published under the auspices of the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations. Grateful acknowledgment is made to Allison Trzop, the author of this history, and to the Unitarian Universalist Veatch Program at Shelter Rock for their generous support of this project. © 2007 by Allison Trzop Originally submitted as a master’s degree project for Emerson College in May 2006 All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America 10 09 08 07 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 This book is printed on acid-free paper that meets the uncoated paper ANSI/NISO specifications for permanence as revised in 1992. Composition by Wilsted & Taylor Publishing Services It’s tragic when a nation, dedicated and committed to the principle of freedom, reaches such a point that the greatest fear we have is from the government itself. edwin lane 1971 june 13 The New York Times publishes its first article on the Pentagon Papers under the headline “Vietnam Archive.” june 29–30 Senator Mike Gravel reads from the papers to his Senate subcommittee and enters the rest into its records. The papers are made public. august 17 Beacon Press publicly announces its intention to publish the papers. october 10 The government version of the Pentagon Papers is published. october 22 The Beacon Press edition of the Pentagon Papers is published simultaneously in cloth and paper in four volumes. october 27 FBI agents appear at the New England Merchants National Bank asking to see UUA records.
    [Show full text]
  • Pacifica Radio Syndicated Program Directory
    PACIFICA RADIO SYNDICATED PROGRAM DIRECTORY The following programs are distributed through the Pacifica network. Some are produced by Pacifica stations or the network itself; others are independent productions that use Pacifica distribution channels. To suggest additions or changes to this guide for future editions, write to Pacifica Network Affiliates Coordinator Ursula Ruedenberg, [email protected]. WEEKLY PROGRAMS (30-60 min) Alternative Radio New Dimensions Are We Alone? Off The Hook Behind the News Poetswest Between the Lines Sea Change Radio Bookwaves Sierra Club Radio Brain Labor Report Sojourner Truth Radio Building Bridges Song of the Soul Century of Lies Spirit in Action Corporate Watchdog Radio Spoiler Alert Radio Counterspin Sprouts Cultural Baggage Taking Aim Earthbeat Talk Nation Radio Electromatic Radio The 300-350 Show (Climate Radio) Encounters The Global Report Exploration This Way Out Flashpoints (Best of) Time of Useful Consciousness From the Vault Uprising GRIT Radio Urban Herbalist Indigenous Politics We News Law and Disorder What's At Stake Madness Radio WINGS Making Contact Writer's Voice Midweek Politics Yin Radio MyNDTALK Your Own Health And Fitness DAILY PROGRAMS (30-60 min) Against the Grain (3 days/week) Free Speech Radio News Brain Labor Report Hard Knock Radio Democracy Now! Informativo Pacifica Flashpoints MODULES WEEKLY PROGRAM MODULES (<10 min) Black Agenda Report Peak Oil Check-In Media Minutes Weekly Radio Spin DAILY PROGRAM MODULES (<10 min) 4:20 Drug War News Workers Independent News Jim Hightower’s Commentaries AGAINST THE GRAIN Program logo courtesy of KPFA C.S. Soong PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Against the Grain features intelligent, in-depth interviews with progressive and radical scholars and activists.
    [Show full text]
  • Unjust War Rev. Catie Scudera First Parish in Needham, 11/10/19 Just
    Unjust War Rev. Catie Scudera First Parish in Needham, 11/10/19 Just last week, just in time for Veterans Day, New York Times editor and journalist Carol Giacomo published a report that “Suicide Has Been Deadlier Than Combat for the [U.S.] Military.” She wrote, “More than 45,000 veterans and active-duty service members have [died by suicide] in the past six years. That is more than 20 deaths a day — in other words, more suicides each year than the total American military deaths in Afghanistan and Iraq. The latest Pentagon figures show the suicide rate for active-duty troops across all service branches rose by over a third in five years… In 2016, veterans were one and a half times more likely to [die by suicide] than people who hadn’t served in the military… [and] the risk nearly doubles in the first year after a veteran leaves active duty.” When I think about honoring our veterans, my heart is often pulled toward tragic numbers like these. Many of our service members return home with severe physical injuries, including of the brain; mental health disorders, including Post Traumatic Stress Disorder; and, horrific memories of being shot at, seeing colleagues and friends hurt or killed, or missions gone wrong against unintended targets, like civilians and children. And, after veterans return home, they may be greeted with a “Thank you for your service” — but many also notice the news reports and conversation among family and friends that draws into question whether our current incursions in Afghanistan, Iraq, and elsewhere have done anything positive to secure freedom and safety “over there” or right here in America.
    [Show full text]
  • Regional Oral History Office University of California the Bancroft Library Berkeley, California
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California Ben H. Bagdikian JOURNALIST, MEDIA CRITIC, PROFESSOR AND DEAN EMERITUS UC BERKELEY’S GRADUATE SCHOOL OF JOURNALISM Interviews conducted by Lisa Rubens in 2010 Copyright © 2011 by The Regents of the University of California ii Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and Ben Bagdikian dated June 4, 2010. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • To Say That the Press Brought Down Nixon, That's Horseshit," He Says
    From AJR, August/September 2004 Thirty years after President Nixon’s resignation, there’s little agreement over just how important a role journalism played in bringing him down. But there’s no doubt the episode had a significant impact on the profession. By Mark Feldstein Mark Feldstein ([email protected]), a veteran investigative reporter, is the Richard Eaton Chair in Broadcast Journalism at the University of Maryland. hirty years ago, on August 9, 1974, the Washington Post ran what was then the largest front-page headline in its history: "Nixon Resigns." That date marked both the end of Richard Nixon's presidency and the beginning of three decades of debate about what role journalism played in uncovering the Watergate scandal that forced Nixon from office – and how Watergate, in turn, influenced journalism itself. Did media muckraking actually bring down a president of the United States? How have politics and investigative reporting changed as a result? Thirty years later, the answers to these basic questions remain nearly as polarized as they were in Nixon's day. While journalism schools continue to teach the lesson of Watergate as a heroic example of courageous press coverage under fire, some scholars have concluded that the media played at best a modest role in ousting Nixon from office. So what really happened? In the end, perhaps truth lies somewhere between the self-congratulatory boosterism of journalists and the kiss-off of the academics. By now, of course, Watergate has become part of our folklore: Five men wearing business suits and surgical gloves arrested in the middle of the night with illegal bugging devices at the Democratic Party headquarters in the Watergate building in Washington, D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • THE MOST DANGEROUS MAN in AMERICA: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers
    THE MOST DANGEROUS MAN IN AMERICA: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers A film by Judith Ehrlich and Rick Goldsmith USA – 2009 – 94 Minutes Special Jury Award - International Documentary Film Festival Amsterdam (IDFA) “Freedom of Expression Award” & One of Top Five Documentaries - National Board of Review Audience Award, Best Documentary - Mill Valley (CA) Film Festival Official Selection - 2009 Toronto International Film Festival Official Selection - 2009 Vancouver Film Festival Official Selection - WatchDocs, Warsaw, Poland Contacts Los Angeles New York Nancy Willen Julia Pacetti Acme PR JMP Verdant Communications 1158 26th St. #881 [email protected] Santa Monica, CA 90403 (917) 584-7846 [email protected] (310) 963-3433 THE MOST DANGEROUS MAN IN AMERICA: Daniel Ellsberg and the Pentagon Papers Selects from reviews of The Most Dangerous Man in America: “Riveting! A straight-ahead, enthralling story of moral courage. This story changed the world. The movie offers one revelatory interview after another. CRITICS’ PICK!” – David Edelstein, New York magazine “Detailed, clearly told, persuasive” – Mike Hale, The New York Times “A Must-See! Crams a wealth of material into 90 minutes without losing clarity or momentum. Focuses on (Ellsberg’s) moral turnaround, which directly impacted history. A unique fusion of personal and social drama.” – Ronnie Scheib, Variety “The filmmakers do an astounding job… earnest, smart documentary… "The Most Dangerous Man" offers a brisk and eye-opening approach to recent history.” – Chris Barsanti, Hollywood Reporter “The most exciting thriller I’ve seen in a while… as powerful as anything Hollywood can throw at us.” – V.A. Musetto, New York Post “The essential new documentary.
    [Show full text]