Forging a Link Between Composting and Sustainable Agriculture

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Forging a Link Between Composting and Sustainable Agriculture . c Forging A Link Between Composting And Sustainable Agriculture The concept of composting has always Agriculture, and the Food and Drug Ad- been rooted in a soil conservation philosophy ministration could lead the way for the that recognizes the role of organic matter in availability of more research to better un- agriculture. The paradox has been that the re- derstand the role of composted organic cent rise in composting interest has come residuals in sustainable agriculture from the need for waste management solu- (Goldstein, 1993). tions which emphasize economical and envi- ronmental alternatives, not the need for soil An example of such research is a pro- improvement and nutrient recycling. This re- ject on a Boynton Beach, Florida farm view traces some early researches on the link that grows 200 acres of sweet peppers in between compost application and crop pro- double rows on beds which are covered ductivity and urges greater support for re- with plastic mulch and treated with search that shows how compost can reduce methyl bromide to kill weed seed nema- pesticide use, improve farm economics and, todes. Researchers from the University of in general, support the goals of sustainable Florida are testing the use of composts agriculture. from municipal solid waste and sewage sludge/yard trimmings (Roe, et. a?., sustainable agricultural system 1993). Amust be economically sound, social- In 1986, Hoitink and Fahy reviewed ly acceptable, and environmentally com- the research literature citing examples of patible, writes William B. Lacy of the Col- how diseases caused by soilborned plant lege of Agricultural Science at Penn State pathogens were controlled by composts. University (Lacy, 1993). The challenge of “Activity of antagonists involved in bio- sustainable agricultural research and ed- logical control is affected by nutrients ucation programs is to develop systems present in compost. For example, highly that meet these three interconnected stabilized organic matter, such as sphag- goals, he notes. “A sustainable approach num peat, does not support an actively requires producers to substitute manage- suppressive biomass. On the other hand, ment, scientific information, and on-farm ‘properly’ stabilized composts do sup- resources for the purchased inputs on port such activity. This review therefore which their farming enterprises current- emphasizes the role of organic matter in ly depend.” , activity of antagonists involved in bio- \;. \;. Some of those purchased inputs are logical control of plant pathogens” ................... .............................................. pesticides and fertilizers. Over the years, (Hoitink and Fahy, 1986). .........., .._ .- . ., a number of research projects have fo- Fahy and Hoitink provide some ad- cused on the ability of compost to reduce ditional examples for using compost to the need for those inputs. The impor- control disease. Composted larch bark is tance of these past studies as well as the used by vegetable growers in Japan to limited research currently underway protect the Chinese yam from brown rot. was emphasized in June with the an- Composts from tree leaves and rice hulls nouncement by three federal agencies of were effective for control of clubroot on a major policy shift aimed at reducing the Chinese cabbage. Decomposed ammoni- use of chemicals for production of the ated Douglas fir bark was useful for con- food supply in the United States. The trolling Phytophthora disease on straw- joint announcement by the Environmen- berries. Composted municipal sludge tal Protection Agency, the Department of (CMS) was effective for reducing lettuce 48 Compost Science 8 Utilization Summer, 1993 r drop caused by Sclerotiniu minor. A range workers involved actual observations on of studies also have been conducted to the survival of selected pathogens under measure the effects of CMS on root rot, a variety of conditions in composting. In crown rot and wilting of different vege- general, their results confirmed the pre- tation with varying results (Hoitink and dictions of the U.S. researchers, although Fahy, 1986). the required durations of exposure proved to be somewhat longer. ~~~ ~ Composting Perspectives Research on composting received a Clarence Golueke in 1972 reviewed considerable impetus in the mid-1960s the progress of composting beginning both as a result of funds made available with Sir Albert Howard who in the early through the passage of the 1965 Solid 1900s began to systematize the tradition- Wastes Act, and of a beginning of con- al compost procedures as ”one of the cern by the public for its environment. most ancient of the agricultural The research was characterized in large arts.”(Golueke, 1972) His collaborators part by the rediscovery of the findings were Jackson and Ward, and the compost made by the early researchers. Perhaps system became known as the Indore sys- the most unfortunate part of this period tem - i.e., named for the region of India of ”rediscovery” was that in many in- in which it was developed. According to stances, the new ”discovers” were un- Golueke, the 1940s and the early 1950s aware of the findings of their predeces- marked the beginning of a surge of inter- sors. The major difference between the est in the use of composting as a means of two groups was that the reports of the reclaiming plant nutrients in municipal latter were couched in a more sophisti- refuse. cated terminology than were the earlier ”It was at that time that a need began works. to be felt for undertaking studies to de- Continues Golueke in his 1972 re- velop the scientific principles of com- view: The late 1960s not only brought a posting and to bring some order and deepening public concern with preserv- shed some light upon the welter of folk- ing the quality of the environment, but lore and superstition that characterized also a willingness persists despite politi- the practice until that time. Thus, re- cal and industry generated attempts to search conducted by the New Zealand discourage both trends. One of the spin- Government’s Inter-Departmental Com- offs of this renewed concern with conser- mittee for the Disposal of Organic Wastes vation and the environment is a renewed led to the publication of two reports in interest in composting. For one thing, the which were explored the scientific as- fallacy of the ”double-standard” has pects of the mechanics of the soil im- been abandoned, and now the idea of provement accomplished by incorporat- composting as a paying proposition in a ing compost in the soil. It was also at this purely monetary sense has been practi- time that the University of California be- cally universally abandoned. Instead, the gan its research on composting, an out- process is being evaluated in terms of its come of which was technical bulletin no. complete social benefits. For example, 9, ”Reclamation of Municipal Refuse by the transition has been made from the Composting.” point at which the worth of the compost The efforts of European researchers product was judged primarily upon the during this period were largely oriented dollar-and-cents value of its nitrogen, towards the hygienic aspects of compost- phosphorus, and potassium (NPK) con- -~~ ing. While the U.S. researchers were con- tent. Now, the NPK monetary value of cerned about the survival of pathogenic compost has been recognized for what it _I_ organisms, they did little actual experi- is -quite minor in terms of environment mentation on the subject. On the other betterment and improvement of soil hand, research by several European quality. Maximum productivity of the Compost Science 8 Utilization Summer, 1993 49 soil is the proper criterion - not a bal- into the soil, and undesirable gases, such ance between cash value of increased as carbon dioxide, move out. The loose, crop production per dollar spent on the friable soil does not restrict root move- NPK needed to bring about the increase. ment as compared with a compacted soil. Thus, the effect of the compost product Thus, composted sewage sludge im- on the lasting improvement of the soil is proves soil conditions, providing a desir- receiving its due attention. Another ap- able environment for plant growth. ." plication beginning to receive attention is "Cooperative studies are being con- that of incorporating compost into the ducted at Beltsville to determine the use- soil to prevent nitrogen contamination of fulness of composted sewage sludge as a ground waters by converting it (nitro- low grade fertilizer for lawns, potting gen) into a relatively insoluble form, mixtures for plants, for revegetating namely, microbial protoplasm. The ni- mine spoil land with grasses and trogen is released in a gradual manner legumes, and for other field and veg- through the death and decay of the mi- etable crops. crobes. Attention was focused on this de- "Preliminary data show that com- sirable trend as a result of the growing posted sewage sludge has a fertilizer rat- alarm over the increasing contamination ing of about 0.9 percent nitrogen, 2.3 per- of our water supply attending the exces- cent phosphoric acid and 0.2 percent sive use of inorganic nitrogen fertilizers potash. This means that it will take five to in large-scale agriculture, concluded 10 times as much composted sludge to Golueke. supply the same plant nutrients as an or- dinary 5-10-5 chemical fertilizer (five Compost As A Soil Conditioner percent nitrogen, 10 percent phosphoric And Fertilizer Source acid, and five percent potash). Therefore, In September, 1973, the United States farmers probably could not afford to use Department of Agriculture's Research compost unless it were very inexpensive Station at Beltsville, Maryland held a or given away. "Sludge Composting Field Day" to demonstrate that composting was eco- Heavy Metals In Compost nomical and that the method produced "Adding composted sludge to soil si- "a valuable soil conditioner and fertiliz- multaneously adds appreciable amounts ing material.
Recommended publications
  • Dendrometric Analysis of Early Development of Eucalyptus Urophylla X Eucalyptus Grandis with Gypsum Use Under Subtropical Conditions
    Floresta e Ambiente 2020; 27(1): e20190095 https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.009519 ISSN 2179-8087 (online) Original Article Silviculture Dendrometric Analysis of Early Development of Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis with Gypsum use Under Subtropical Conditions Carla Fernanda Ferreira1, Marcos Vinicius Martins Bassaco2 , Milena Pereira3, Volnei Pauletti3, Stephen Arthur Prior4 , Antonio Carlos Vargas Motta3 1Departamento de Agronomia, Centro de Ensino Superior dos Campos Gerais – CESCAGE, Ponta Grossa/PR, Brasil 2 Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Faculdades FATI-FAJAR, Jaguariaíva/PR, Brasil 3Departamento de Solos e Engenharia Agrícola, Universidade Federal do Paraná – UFPR, Curitiba/PR, Brasil 4ARS National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Auburn, USA ABSTRACT Gypsum can be used as a source for calcium (Ca) and sulphurum (S) for plants, as well as an acid, that is, a natural soil conditioner. Aiming to determine the influence of gypsum on the development of Eucalyptus urograndis in Brazil, an experiment was conducted at two locations in Paraná State. Experiments were conducted with rates of 0, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8 and 9.6 Mg ha-1 to verify the method of broadcast planting in a randomized block design with four repetitions. Diameter and height of plants were measured every six months and volume was determined after 36 months. There was a difference in Eucalyptus growth between the two areas, possibly related to differences in planting season and climate. Gypsum did not influence on the dendrometric growth of Eucalyptus trees. The lack of a response to gypsum, as a source of Ca, S and soil conditioner, was discussed based on soil type, Eucalyptus tolerance to soil acidity, and climatic conditions in the period evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Opens in a New Windowguidelines for Pesticide Registration
    GUIDELINES FOR PESTICIDE REGISTRATION CONTROL OF PLANTS ACT, CHAPTER 57A. Control of Plants (Registration of Pesticides) Rules. General Information A. All agricultural pesticide1 products used in the cultivation of plants intended for sale must be registered with the Singapore Food Agency (SFA).These include pesticide-containing biostimulant/fertilizer/soil conditioner. Biostimulant/fertilizer/soil conditioner which does not contain pesticide, or pesticide products for other purposes, including export, and industrial, public hygiene, landscaping and household uses, do not require registration with SFA. Pesticides used for the formulation of pesticide products also do not require registration with SFA. B. Any person who manufactures, imports, distributes, supplies or sells any pesticide products and who is conducting business in Singapore which is registered under the Business Names Registration Act 2014, or any company incorporated under the Companies Act, may apply for the registration of pesticide products for use in the agricultural farms in Singapore. C. Before applying for registration of a pesticide product with SFA, applicants are required to check whether the import of the pesticide for local use is allowed by the following agencies: i) Pollution Control Department (PCD) of the National Environment Agency (NEA) for import, export and sale of chemical pesticides that are listed as hazardous substances ii) Plant Health Services of the National Parks Board (NParks) for import of biological pesticides and organic fertilizers [Please check with NEA if you intend to register pesticides for vector control purposes.] D. If applicants are dealing with pesticides that are listed in the Environmental Protection and Management Act (EPMA), a copy of the Hazardous Substances Licence issued by the PCD/NEA must accompany the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Conditioner Recovery Product Construction Amendment
    Guaranteed Analysis DIRECTIONS FOR USE Total Nitrogen (N) ...........................1.0% 0.5% Water Soluble Nitrogen Aerification Available Phosphate (P2O5) ................0% Renovate Plus is a recommended aerification Soluble Potash (K2O) ......................1.0% product. A wide range of application rates can Calcium (Ca) .................................5.0% be made depending on the desired outcome. Iron (Fe) .........................................2.0% Recommended rates are 10 to 25 pounds of Renovate P Renovate Plus Renovate product per 1,000 sq. ft. dragged into aeration Ingredients: CARBON BASED FERTILITY holes followed by watering the soil surface. L Compost, kelp, bone meal, greensand, rock Sod & Seed Establishment U phosphate, calcium sulfate, zeolites, humates. Apply Renovate Plus directly to the soil surface and scarify into the top inch or two of soil. Information regarding the contents and levels S Recommended rates are 10 to 25 pounds of of metals in this product is available on the e way s product per 1000 sq. ft. Internet at: g th ince http://www.aapfco.org/metals.htm din 19 Sand Construction Amendment ea 88 Up to 800 pounds of Renovate Plus per 1000 L sq. ft. worked into the top 6 to 8 inches of sand is recommended for sand root zone construc- tion. A complete chemistry soil testing protocol should accompany all construction programs including a particle size analysis. Lawn Care and Turf Maintenance Apply 10 to 25 pounds of product per 1000 sq. ft. as a top dressing ideally accompanied with TM surface spiking. On the weakest areas use the higher rates and water in thoroughly. Ornamental Planting Renovate Plus is a recommended planting amendment for woody ornamentals, perennials and annuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Permaculture in Humid Landscapes
    II PERMACULTURE IN HUMID LANDSCAPES BY BILL MOLLISON Pamphlet II in the Permaculture Design Course Series PUBLISHED BY YANKEE PERMACULTURE Publisher and Distributor of Permaculture Publications Barking Frogs Permaculture Center P.O. Box 52, Sparr FL 32192-0052 USA Email: [email protected] http://www.permaculture.net/~EPTA/Hemenway.htm Edited from the Transcript of the Permaculture Design Course The Rural Education Center, Wilton, NH USA 1981 Reproduction of this Pamphlet Is Free and Encouraged Pamphlet II Permaculture in Humid Landscapes Page 1. The category we are in now is hu- mid landscapes, which means a rain- fall of more than 30 inches. Our thesis is the storage of this water on the landscape. The important part is that America is not doing it. The humid landscape is water con- trolled, and unless it is an extremely new landscape- volcanic or newly faulted--it has softly rounded out- lines. When you are walking up the valley, or walking on the ridge, ob- serve that there is a rounded 'S' shaped profile to the hills. Where the landscape turns from convex to concave occurs a critical Having found the keypoint, we can now treat the whole landscape as if it were a roof and point that we call a keypoint.* a tank. The main valley is the main flow, from the horizontal, we put in a nomically store water. It is a rather with many little creeks entering. At groove around the hill. This is the deep little dam, and we need a fair the valley head where these creeks highest point at which we can work amount of Earth to build it.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Soil Organic Matter for a Sustainable Organic Crop Production
    Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service PSS-2257 Building Soil Organic Matter for a Sustainable Organic Crop Production Kefyalew Girma Former Assistant Professor/Sustainable Agriculture Specialist Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheets are also available on our website at: Hailin Zhang http://osufacts.okstate.edu Professor Warren Roberts Benefi ts of Soil Organic Matter Associate Professor The content of SOM in an organic crop production system is the most important factor because it is the primary nutrient Organic Matter Matters! supplier and soil conditioner. Organic matter in the soil bal- Organic matter (OM) normally constitutes less than 5 ances various chemical and biological processes and helps to percent of most mineral soils. The majority of Oklahoma soils maintain soil quality parameters at an ideal level. It improves actually have only about 1 percent OM, but it is a key factor water infi ltration rate and water-holding capacity. It serves in determining the health of a soil. In principle, all organic as a reservoir of nutrients and water and supplies them to materials can be changed to soil organic matter (SOM) and crops when needed. Organic matter plays a signifi cant role can supply nutrients as well as “condition” the soil. Organic in keeping disease and insect pests at low levels by boosting matter is defi ned as any non-living organism, or product of a crop vigor and modifying the rhizosphere. Soils that are rich living organism on the surface or in the soil. Through decom- in SOM also have a high cation exchange capacity (CEC). position, organic materials added to a soil change to SOM Organic matter contains many negatively charged surfaces while releasing nutrients.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Environmental Regulations for Agribusiness
    CHAP TE R TH R E E : AG R I C H E M I C AL S - PE S TI C I D E & FE RTI LI Z E R Agrichemicals - Pesticide & Fe rt i l i ze r Agrichemical dealers provide crop protection (pesticides) and enhancement (fert i l i zers) products to farmers. So m e facilities manufacture, formulate, package and re p a c k a g e agrichemicals prior to distribution. Others refill agrichemi- cal totes or mini bulk containers for their customers. T h e s e facilities typically have divisions between formulating and packaging operations and between dry and liquid o p e r a t i o n s . Some dealerships are corporately owned and/or managed and re c e i ve agrichemical use, storage and handling infor- mation from their parent company or corporate headquar- ters; some may belong to trade associations that prov i d e information and training on proper enviro n m e n t a l p ro c e d u res; and others may not have information re a d i l y a vailable to them. The following is an ove rv i ew and s u m m a ry of the environmental re q u i rements applying to agrichemical dealers. Ge n e r a l l y, agrichemicals fall under the regulation of the Iowa De p a rtment of Agricultural and Land St ew a rd s h i p (IDALS). A. Which Environmental Laws Apply to Agrichemicals – Pesticide and Fertilizer? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 71122 Liquid Chisel 0-0-4 BL 2/7/14 10:29 AM Page 1
    71122 Liquid Chisel 0-0-4 BL 2/7/14 10:29 AM Page 1 0-0-4 SOIL CONDITIONER, CONCENTRATED POTASH SOLUTION AND LINE CLEANER GUARANTEED ANALYSIS Soluble Potash (K2O) . 4.00% Derived from potassium hydroxide. ALSO CONTAINS NON-PLANT FOOD INGREDIENTS: 63% . Polyaliphatic acid salts 5% . Alkyl aryl sulfonates (as line cleaner and soil conditioning agents) 68% . Total PEEL BACK BOOK HERE AND RESEAL AFTER OPENING KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN WARNING Causes mild skin irritation Causes severe eye irritation Harmful if swallowed Wear protective gloves and Eye/Face protection See Inside Panel for Additional Precautionary Statements SN 091213 WEIGHT PER GAL.: 9.9 lbs. (4.35 kg) Information about the components of this lot of fertilizer may be obtained by writing to Helena Chemical Company, 225 Schilling Boule- vard, Suite 300, Collierville, TN 38017 and giving the lot number which is found on the container. Information regarding the contents and levels of metals in this product is available on the Internet at http://www.aapfco.org/metals.htm Manufactured For HELENA CHEMICAL COMPANY 225 SCHILLING BOULEVARD, SUITE 300 • COLLIERVILLE, TN 38017 OPM #121190 NET CONTENTS: PF-71122 71122 Liquid Chisel 0-0-4 LF 2/7/14 10:30 AM Page 1 (1,1) PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS LIQUID CHISEL™ can be applied in a wide va WARNING kler jet and other irrigation systems. It can also BEFORE USING THIS PRODUCT, READ ALL PRECAUTIONS, DIRECTIONS FOR USE, CONDITIONS OF can be applied as a soil spray. When metering SALE – LIMITED WARRANTY AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY AND REMEDIES. ing injection pump or suction regulated line, do n to a public water system without a back siphon Avoid eye contact with formulated product.
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Farming and Growing Standards
    Soil Association Standards Farming and growing Version 18.6: Updated on 12th February 2021 Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 4 Guide to using these standards ................................................................................................................ 5 1.0 General standards for organic farming and growing....................................................................... 8 1.1 Scope ......................................................................................................................................................... 8 1.2 Principles ................................................................................................................................................. 9 1.3 Becoming Soil Association certified ................................................................................................ 11 1.4 Your obligations when certified....................................................................................................... 14 1.5 Inspections ............................................................................................................................................ 17 1.6 Non-compliance with the standards .............................................................................................. 19 1.7 Record keeping ....................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • STORIES from OUR FOOD GARDENS Melveen Jackson
    STORIES FROM OUR FOOD GARDENS MElvEEN JAckson STORIES FROM OUR FOOD GARDENS MIDlands kwAzUlU-Natal, South AFRIcA 2012 MElvEEN JAckson for Mandie With ThANkS to The Saville Foundation African Conservation Trust Dovehouse Organic Farm and Training Centre Arauna Ark Ministry Zakhe Academy and Training Institute Baynesfield Estate Thatchers Practically Permaculture Photographs: Nikki Raw William Jackson Melveen Jackson June Smith Assistance in editing: William Jackson Robyn Jackson Glen Jager contents 1 FARMING FOR ThE FUTURE 7 NO NEED 7 WHAT WE DO 7 IT IS TEAM WORK 8 PERMACULTURE MAKES IT POSSIBLE ON POOR LAND 8 START WITH SOIL NUTRITION 9 SUPER COMPOST GROWS SUPER FOOD 9 FOR ONE HEAP 2m x 3m x 1.8m 10 TO MAKE BEST PRACTICE COMPOST 11 EFFECTIVE MICRO-ORGANISMS 13 TO MULTIPLY AND ENSURE YOUR OWN SUPPLY OF EMS STOCK 13 OThER wAYS TO IMPROvE SOIl NUTRITION 14 THE TRENCH COMPOST GARDEN 14 TO MAKE A TRENCH GARDEN 14 VERMICULTURE: WORMS WONDERFUL WORMS 14 TO MAKE A BUCKET OR BIN WORMERY 15 TO MAKE A TRENCH WORMERY 16 LIQUID MANURE 17 TO MAKE LIQUID MANURE 17 GREEN MANURE, GREEN MULCH 17 SOIL NUTRITION CONCLUSIONS 19 ENDNOTES 19 FURTHER READING 19 03 2 PERMAcUlTURE PRINcIPlES AND PRAcTIcES 21 WHY PERMACULTURE? WHAT IS PERMACULTURE? 21 PERMACULTURE RECYCLES SOLAR ENERGY 21 CULTIVATED PERMANENT AGRICULTURE 21 MAXIMISING EFFICIENCY: USING CONNECTIVITY 22 ELEMENTS OF DESIGN 22 ZONE PLAN 22 SLOPE PLAN 23 SECTOR PLAN 23 WATER HARVESTING 24 SUCCESSION AND PIONEER PLANTING REDUCE OUR WORK 26 TO CULTIVATE FOR SUCCESSION AND DIVERSITY 27 OBSERVATION AND INTUITION
    [Show full text]
  • Bulk Soils & Amendments
    BULK SOILS & AMENDMENTS LAKE MURRAY MIX Includes ground pine bark, sand, land plaster (gypsum), lime, 14-7-7 fertilizer with micronutrients, fire ant killer VEGETABLE GARDEN MIX (for raised beds) Includes ground pine bark, sand, land plaster (gypsum), lime, mushroom compost, peat moss, and organic fertilizer (Espoma Garden Tone) SOIL CONDITIONER (amendment for clay soil) Ground pine bark (partially composted) SAND BAGGED SOILS & AMENDMENTS PREMIUM POTTING MIX - 1.5 cu. ft. Blend of softwood bark, composted peanut hulls, Canadian Spagnum peat moss, dolomite lime, and a wetting agent SOIL CONDITIONER - 1.5 cu. ft. Processed softwood bark MUSHROOM COMPOST - 40 lb. Spent mushroom compost BLACK KOW COMPOSTED MANURE - 50 lb. Composted cow manure SQUARE FOOT GARDEN MIX - 2 cu. ft. Same as Mel’s Mix - Five composts, including poultry and mushroom, peat moss, coarse vermiculite STOUT OLLIE COMPOST - 1.5 cu. ft. A Certified SC grown product, can be used as a soil amendment, top dressing or just like potting soil. PEAT MOSS - 3.8 cu.ft. or 1 cu.ft VERMICULITE COARSE - 4 cu. ft. WORM CASTINGS - 1 cu. ft. Revised 01/15/16 SOIL MEASUREMENT / CONVERSION 1 scoop = 9 cu.ft. = 1/3 cu.yd. 3 scoops = 27 cu.ft. = 1 cu.yd. 1 scoop covers 33 sq.ft. with 3 in. depth 1 cu. yd. covers 99 sq.ft. with 3 in. depth 1 scoop = 150 lbs. 1 cu.yd. = 450 lbs. Formula for Square Feet = length x width Formula for Cubic Feet = length x width x height Two ways to determine amount of bulk soil needed: Formula for cu.yds.
    [Show full text]
  • IDEM Vermicomposting Fact Sheet
    Take the first step and go Green Vermicomposting Fact Sheet What is vermicomposting? culate. Suitable materials include shredded paper Commonly known as worm composting, vermicom- (such as black-and-white newspapers, paper bags, posting is the process of using redworms to convert computer paper, or cardboard); composted animal organic materials including food waste into humus, manure (cow, horse, or rabbit); shredded, decay- a nutrient-rich soil conditioner. Vermicomposting ing leaves; peat moss (which increases moisture works similar to regular composting, except worms retention); or any combination of these. Do not are used. The worms feed on your food waste, use glossy paper or magazines. turning it into some of the best fertilizer on earth. Water. The bedding must be kept moist (but not Vermicomposting can be done in small spaces, wet) to enable the worms to breathe. Worms take such as classrooms. in oxygen through their moist skin. Why should schools vermicompost? Worms. It is important to get the type of worms Using worms to decompose food waste offers that will thrive in a worm bin. Only redworms or several advantages: “wigglers” which are “composting worms” should It can reduce garbage disposal costs. be used (do not use night crawlers or other types of worms). It produces fewer odors and attracts fewer pests than putting food wastes into a Food Scraps. Feed worms any organic waste such garbage container. as vegetables, fruits, eggshells, tea bags, coffee grounds, paper coffee filters, and shredded garden It saves water and electricity that sinks and waste. Do not add meat scraps or bones, fish, garbage disposals use.
    [Show full text]
  • A Narrative Review of the Facts and Perspectives on Agricultural Fertilization in Europe, with a Focus on Italy
    horticulturae Review A Narrative Review of the Facts and Perspectives on Agricultural Fertilization in Europe, with a Focus on Italy Arianna Latini 1,* , Germina Giagnacovo 1, Carlo Alberto Campiotti 1, Carlo Bibbiani 2 and Susanna Mariani 1 1 Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA), Energy Efficiency Department, Casaccia Research Center, 00123 Rome, Italy; [email protected] (G.G.); [email protected] (C.A.C.); [email protected] (S.M.) 2 Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, 56126 Pisa, Italy; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Fertilizers stand at the base of current agricultural practices, providing the nutrient sus- tainment required for growing plants. Most fertilizers are synthetic chemicals, whose exploitation at very high levels poses a risk to cultivated land and the whole environment. They have several drawbacks including soil degradation, water pollution, and human food safety. Currently, the urgent need to counterbalance these negative environmental impacts has opened the way for the use of natural and renewable products that may help to restore soil structure, microorganism communities, nutrient elements, and, in some cases, to positively enhance carbon soil sequestration. Here, we endeavor to reinforce the vision that effective strategies designed to mitigate negative anthropic and climate change impacts should combine, in appropriate proportions, solutions addressed to a lower Citation: Latini, A.; Giagnacovo, G.; and less energy intensive production of chemicals and to a more inclusive exploitation of renewable Campiotti, C.A.; Bibbiani, C.; Mariani, natural products as biological soil amendments. After drawing an overview of the agricultural energy S.
    [Show full text]