Permaculture in Humid Landscapes

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Permaculture in Humid Landscapes II PERMACULTURE IN HUMID LANDSCAPES BY BILL MOLLISON Pamphlet II in the Permaculture Design Course Series PUBLISHED BY YANKEE PERMACULTURE Publisher and Distributor of Permaculture Publications Barking Frogs Permaculture Center P.O. Box 52, Sparr FL 32192-0052 USA Email: [email protected] http://www.permaculture.net/~EPTA/Hemenway.htm Edited from the Transcript of the Permaculture Design Course The Rural Education Center, Wilton, NH USA 1981 Reproduction of this Pamphlet Is Free and Encouraged Pamphlet II Permaculture in Humid Landscapes Page 1. The category we are in now is hu- mid landscapes, which means a rain- fall of more than 30 inches. Our thesis is the storage of this water on the landscape. The important part is that America is not doing it. The humid landscape is water con- trolled, and unless it is an extremely new landscape- volcanic or newly faulted--it has softly rounded out- lines. When you are walking up the valley, or walking on the ridge, ob- serve that there is a rounded 'S' shaped profile to the hills. Where the landscape turns from convex to concave occurs a critical Having found the keypoint, we can now treat the whole landscape as if it were a roof and point that we call a keypoint.* a tank. The main valley is the main flow, from the horizontal, we put in a nomically store water. It is a rather with many little creeks entering. At groove around the hill. This is the deep little dam, and we need a fair the valley head where these creeks highest point at which we can work amount of Earth to build it. It is not start, we locate the major keypoint. with mechanical tools. Above that, it the most economical dam that we will From there on, the keyline starts to is too steep. We make a little shelf have, but it gathers all the water fall from one in 1,000 to one in 2,000 around the hill leading to the keypoint. from the top of the hill to that point. below contour. The dams we make in No matter where this water was go- We can make that keypoint dam as the lower valleys will be slightly low- ing, we have now started to divert it, large as we can afford. It will enable er at each point. They will not be at bringing it right around the hill to the us at any time of the year to run wa- the keypoint. keypoint. In effect, we have put a ter right around this contour and let it Rain falling on the hilltop runs off. gutter around our roof, a very gently fall on any area that we want. We lead The paths described by single rain- falling gutter. We started at the key- the water out through the wall of the drops, wherever they fall, are simi- point and extended a line that we lift- dam, either by siphon or a lock-pipe, lar in that they cross contours at ed one foot at every 2,000 feet. We allowing it to enter a contour drain. right angles, because that is the want to create a very, very gentle We control the flow in the drain by a shortest drop between two contours. fall. Water just moves along it, and sheet of canvas or plastic, fastening Water takes the shortest path across that is all. We have directed the wa- it like a flag to a very light plastic the landscape from where it falls to ter to our keypoint. pipe. A chain attaches to the other end where it hits the river line. It is along At the keypoint, we put a little of the flag, serving as a weight. We this path that raindrops are doing dam; for it is the highest point in the may peg that flag down within the their thing. As soon as they are in the profile of the valley that we can eco- drain, holding back the flow until the river valley, they are off to the sea. It is possible to locate the keypoint from a contour map. Find where the contours start to spread. That is the keypoint. Having found the keypoint, we can All runnoff from now treat the whole landscape as if it above the diversion were a roof and a tank. In a fairly de- drain is collected at scending line, falling gently away the keypoint. This can be directed from *Bill's treatment of keyline differs signifi- an irrigation channel cantly from that of P. A. Yeomans, origi- to any other point nator of the keyline plan. For a more de- below. Slopes of tailed and more accurate treatment of these channels range keyline, see Water for Every Farm-- from 1:200 to Yeomans Keyline Plan, an updated ver- 1:2000. sion of Yeomans' work available from Yankee Permaculture at the address on the cover. Pamphlet II Permaculture in Humid Landscapes Page 2. catch the water; it also defines the point above which you should probably consider forestry, while using the land below for irrigated pasture, croplands, orchards, or even irrigat- ed forest. If you are dealing with a fairly wild forest of walnut and other nuts, it is very useful to be able to pour water on just about the time you are going to harvest. Then all your husks split and the nuts drop out. Be- low the keypoint lies the potential for cultivation. All this that I have been giving you is just a model. I don't expect the "One person can water hundreds of acres this way with no effort at all." drain has filled behind the flag. Then On large property, taking in a whole the water spills over, sheeting down watershed, we may go on construct- across the hillside. About twice a ing further dams on a descending con- year, in summer, this will usually be tour. Away we go, dam to dam to enough to keep the countryside very dam, falling all the way on this one to green. two thousand keyline. As long as your If you want to put out a bush fire main dam is the highest, you can come you just walk backwards with the down to all the little valleys, taking in flag, and you douse the whole hillside. both sides of the watershed. The key- countryside to be like that, for here One person can water hundreds of point should fall to both sides of the we may have rocks and falls and acres this way with no effort at all. watershed. In the next valley, the trees, and maybe a small pasture-- It is very light work. No pumps. dam is a little lower, and the next one but just as a model, that is the way For very large dams, holding five or a little lower. As for the river, it will we would do it. six million gallons, you merely put a flow quite continuously. The more The slope with which we are work- sliding gate or lock-pipe in the dam storage you have on the hills, the ing varies between sand and clay. wall, generally about 18 inches longer that river will flow in summer. Even with sand, if the drop is one foot square. This water will flow out about You can also find situations in which in 2,000, we hardly shift a grain of as fast as you can walk, walking fair- one side of the valley is very, very sand in these ditches. We ran an eight ly slowly. The drain being filled will steep, and the other side very gentle. mile ditch recently in northeast Tas- follow you along. The most restful In this case, it is possible to put stor- mania. We got five or six miles along way to irrigate a large area in this ages on the gentler slope. with one of these ditches--it was in way is to have two people and two Sometimes, again, the keypoint is the summertime and it hadn't rained flags. We peg here, and our friend well up-slope on very gentle, low for months--and there came a light, goes 100 feet ahead and pegs. When sloping country. misty rain. We walked back a couple we have soaked our part of the field, What we are up to is taking water of miles and the ditch was running in we just pull our flag, and our water off non-agricultural land, and prefer- the sand. It had been a guess, sort of flows on to his flag. ably forested land, collecting the wa- a bet. We were doing it with a back- The depth of your ditch depends on ter and the snow melt that has fil- hoe. It was just in sand, and it the size of your dam. If you have a tered through this forest. We don't worked. We filled the first dam on the 5,000 gallon dam and a little garden, want to cultivate those upper slopes. first day of light rain. a small market garden, you can have a They are too steep, and they shouldn't Here you are saying, you have small ditch, and you can control the be cultivated. Depending on your soil, rocks all over the place. Yet, it is flow just by putting a spade in it. don't cultivate beyond a 19 degree very easy to go around outside them, Alternately, you can have some- slope. You can get guidance on this or to bank up on outside of them.
Recommended publications
  • Dendrometric Analysis of Early Development of Eucalyptus Urophylla X Eucalyptus Grandis with Gypsum Use Under Subtropical Conditions
    Floresta e Ambiente 2020; 27(1): e20190095 https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8087.009519 ISSN 2179-8087 (online) Original Article Silviculture Dendrometric Analysis of Early Development of Eucalyptus urophylla x Eucalyptus grandis with Gypsum use Under Subtropical Conditions Carla Fernanda Ferreira1, Marcos Vinicius Martins Bassaco2 , Milena Pereira3, Volnei Pauletti3, Stephen Arthur Prior4 , Antonio Carlos Vargas Motta3 1Departamento de Agronomia, Centro de Ensino Superior dos Campos Gerais – CESCAGE, Ponta Grossa/PR, Brasil 2 Departamento de Engenharia Florestal, Faculdades FATI-FAJAR, Jaguariaíva/PR, Brasil 3Departamento de Solos e Engenharia Agrícola, Universidade Federal do Paraná – UFPR, Curitiba/PR, Brasil 4ARS National Soil Dynamics Laboratory, Auburn, USA ABSTRACT Gypsum can be used as a source for calcium (Ca) and sulphurum (S) for plants, as well as an acid, that is, a natural soil conditioner. Aiming to determine the influence of gypsum on the development of Eucalyptus urograndis in Brazil, an experiment was conducted at two locations in Paraná State. Experiments were conducted with rates of 0, 0.3, 0.6, 1.2, 2.4, 4.8 and 9.6 Mg ha-1 to verify the method of broadcast planting in a randomized block design with four repetitions. Diameter and height of plants were measured every six months and volume was determined after 36 months. There was a difference in Eucalyptus growth between the two areas, possibly related to differences in planting season and climate. Gypsum did not influence on the dendrometric growth of Eucalyptus trees. The lack of a response to gypsum, as a source of Ca, S and soil conditioner, was discussed based on soil type, Eucalyptus tolerance to soil acidity, and climatic conditions in the period evaluated.
    [Show full text]
  • Opens in a New Windowguidelines for Pesticide Registration
    GUIDELINES FOR PESTICIDE REGISTRATION CONTROL OF PLANTS ACT, CHAPTER 57A. Control of Plants (Registration of Pesticides) Rules. General Information A. All agricultural pesticide1 products used in the cultivation of plants intended for sale must be registered with the Singapore Food Agency (SFA).These include pesticide-containing biostimulant/fertilizer/soil conditioner. Biostimulant/fertilizer/soil conditioner which does not contain pesticide, or pesticide products for other purposes, including export, and industrial, public hygiene, landscaping and household uses, do not require registration with SFA. Pesticides used for the formulation of pesticide products also do not require registration with SFA. B. Any person who manufactures, imports, distributes, supplies or sells any pesticide products and who is conducting business in Singapore which is registered under the Business Names Registration Act 2014, or any company incorporated under the Companies Act, may apply for the registration of pesticide products for use in the agricultural farms in Singapore. C. Before applying for registration of a pesticide product with SFA, applicants are required to check whether the import of the pesticide for local use is allowed by the following agencies: i) Pollution Control Department (PCD) of the National Environment Agency (NEA) for import, export and sale of chemical pesticides that are listed as hazardous substances ii) Plant Health Services of the National Parks Board (NParks) for import of biological pesticides and organic fertilizers [Please check with NEA if you intend to register pesticides for vector control purposes.] D. If applicants are dealing with pesticides that are listed in the Environmental Protection and Management Act (EPMA), a copy of the Hazardous Substances Licence issued by the PCD/NEA must accompany the application.
    [Show full text]
  • Driving Dispossession
    DRIVING DISPOSSESSION THE GLOBAL PUSH TO “UNLOCK THE ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF LAND” DRIVING DISPOSSESSION THE GLOBAL PUSH TO “UNLOCK THE ECONOMIC POTENTIAL OF LAND” Acknowledgements Authors: Frédéric Mousseau, Andy Currier, Elizabeth Fraser, and Jessie Green, with research assistance by Naomi Maisel and Elena Teare. We are deeply grateful to the many individual and foundation donors who make our work possible. Thank you. Views and conclusions expressed in this publication are those of the Oakland Institute alone and do not reflect opinions of the individuals and organizations that have sponsored and supported the work. Design: Amymade Graphic Design, [email protected], amymade.com Cover Photo: Maungdaw, Myanmar - Farm laborers and livestocks are seen in a paddy field in Warcha village April 2016 © FAO / Hkun La Photo page 7: Wheat fields © International Finance Corporation Photo page 10: USAID project mapping and titling land in Petauke, Zambia in July 2018 ©Sandra Coburn Photo page 13: Lettuce harvest © Carsten ten Brink Photo page 16: A bull dozer flattens the earth after forests have been cleared in West Pomio © Paul Hilton / Greenpeace Photo page 21: Paddy fields © The Oakland Institute Photo page 24: Forest Fires in Altamira, Pará, Amazon in August, 2019 © Victor Moriyama / Greenpeace Publisher: The Oakland Institute is an independent policy think tank bringing fresh ideas and bold action to the most pressing social, economic, and environmental issues. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0). You are free to share, copy, distribute, and transmit this work under the following conditions: Attribution: You must attribute the work to the Oakland Institute and its authors.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Strategy for Utilizing Rice Forage Production Using a No-Tillage System to Enhance the Self-Sufficient Feed Ratio of Small Scale Dairy Farming in Japan
    Sustainability 2014, 6, 4975-4989; doi:10.3390/su6084975 OPEN ACCESS sustainability ISSN 2071-1050 www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability Article A New Strategy for Utilizing Rice Forage Production Using a No-Tillage System to Enhance the Self-Sufficient Feed Ratio of Small Scale Dairy Farming in Japan Windi Al Zahra 1, Takeshi Yasue 2, Naomi Asagi 2, Yuji Miyaguchi 2, Bagus Priyo Purwanto 1 and Masakazu Komatsuzaki 3,* 1 Faculty of Animal Sciences, Bogor Agricultural University, Jl. Raya Darmaga Kampus IPB Darmaga Bogor, West Java 16680, Indonesia 2 College of Agriculture, Ibaraki University, 3-21-1 Ami, Ibaraki 300-0393, Japan 3 Center for Field Science Research and Education, Ibaraki University, 3-21-1 Ami, Ibaraki 300-0393, Japan * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel./Fax: +81-29-888-8707. Received: 19 March 2014; in revised form: 21 July 2014 / Accepted: 21 July 2014 / Published: 6 August 2014 Abstract: Rice forage systems can increase the land use efficiency in paddy fields, improve the self-sufficient feed ratio, and provide environmental benefits for agro-ecosystems. This system often decreased economic benefits compared with those through imported commercial forage feed, particularly in Japan. We observed the productivities of winter forage after rice harvest between conventional tillage (CT) and no-tillage (NT) in a field experiment. An on-farm evaluation was performed to determine the self-sufficient ratio of feed and forage production costs based on farm evaluation of the dairy farmer and the rice grower, who adopted a rice forage system. The field experiment detected no significant difference in forage production and quality between CT and NT after rice harvest.
    [Show full text]
  • Soil Conditioner Recovery Product Construction Amendment
    Guaranteed Analysis DIRECTIONS FOR USE Total Nitrogen (N) ...........................1.0% 0.5% Water Soluble Nitrogen Aerification Available Phosphate (P2O5) ................0% Renovate Plus is a recommended aerification Soluble Potash (K2O) ......................1.0% product. A wide range of application rates can Calcium (Ca) .................................5.0% be made depending on the desired outcome. Iron (Fe) .........................................2.0% Recommended rates are 10 to 25 pounds of Renovate P Renovate Plus Renovate product per 1,000 sq. ft. dragged into aeration Ingredients: CARBON BASED FERTILITY holes followed by watering the soil surface. L Compost, kelp, bone meal, greensand, rock Sod & Seed Establishment U phosphate, calcium sulfate, zeolites, humates. Apply Renovate Plus directly to the soil surface and scarify into the top inch or two of soil. Information regarding the contents and levels S Recommended rates are 10 to 25 pounds of of metals in this product is available on the e way s product per 1000 sq. ft. Internet at: g th ince http://www.aapfco.org/metals.htm din 19 Sand Construction Amendment ea 88 Up to 800 pounds of Renovate Plus per 1000 L sq. ft. worked into the top 6 to 8 inches of sand is recommended for sand root zone construc- tion. A complete chemistry soil testing protocol should accompany all construction programs including a particle size analysis. Lawn Care and Turf Maintenance Apply 10 to 25 pounds of product per 1000 sq. ft. as a top dressing ideally accompanied with TM surface spiking. On the weakest areas use the higher rates and water in thoroughly. Ornamental Planting Renovate Plus is a recommended planting amendment for woody ornamentals, perennials and annuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Opening up the South
    Hungry Corporations: CO EXUS E N Transnational Biotech Companies Colonise the Food Chain By Helena Paul and Ricarda Steinbrecher with Devlin Kuyek and Lucy Michaels www.econexus.info In association with Econexus and Pesticide Action Network, Asia-Pacific [email protected] Published by Zed Books, November 2003 Chapter 8: Opening Up the South The end is control. To properly understand the means one must first understand the end. A farmer who doesn’t borrow money and plants his own seed is difficult to control because he can feed himself and his neighbours. He doesn’t have to depend on a banker or a politician in a distant city. While farmers in America today are little more than tenants serving corporate and banking interests, the rural Third World farmer has remained relatively out of the loop – until now.1 As the tables that follow show clearly, most GM crops total commercial seed sales of $30 billion for 2001 (see to date have been planted in the North, primarily the Chapter 4), they are also the biggest seed players. US. Argentina is the only country in the South that In order to progress, the companies are looking for grows them on a large scale; GM soya has been grown allies and networks they can use, such as the CNFA there since 1996. China is growing Bt cotton (see pp. 126–9). It is also important to influence the commercially, and a comparatively small amount of governments and institutions (such as universities and tobacco. However, the push into the South is beginning extension services) of countries in the global South, so to accelerate.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluation and Screening of Co-Culture Farming Models in Rice Field Based on Food Productivity
    sustainability Article Evaluation and Screening of Co-Culture Farming Models in Rice Field Based on Food Productivity Tao Jin 1,2, Candi Ge 3, Hui Gao 1, Hongcheng Zhang 1 and Xiaolong Sun 3,* 1 Jiangsu Co-Innovation Center for Modern Production Technology of Grain Crops, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China; [email protected] (T.J.); [email protected] (H.G.); [email protected] (H.Z.) 2 Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Crop Genetics and Physiology, Agricultural College of Yangzhou University, Yangzhou 225009, China 3 Institute of Agricultural Economics and Development, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Nanjing 210014, China; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-25-84390280 Received: 18 February 2020; Accepted: 10 March 2020; Published: 11 March 2020 Abstract: Traditional farming practice of rice field co-culture is a time-tested example of sustainable agriculture, which increases food productivity of arable land with few adverse environmental impacts. However, the small-scale farming practice needs to be adjusted for modern agricultural production. Screening of rice field co-culture farming models is important in deciding the suitable model for industry-wide promotion. In this study, we aim to find the optimal rice field co-culture farming models for large-scale application, based on the notion of food productivity. We used experimental data from the Jiangsu Province of China and applied food-equivalent unit and arable-land-equivalent unit methods to examine applicable protocols for large-scale promotion of rice field co-culture farming models. Results indicate that the rice-loach and rice-catfish models achieve the highest food productivity; the rice-duck model increases the rice yield, while the rice-turtle and rice-crayfish models generate extra economic profits.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Soil Organic Matter for a Sustainable Organic Crop Production
    Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service PSS-2257 Building Soil Organic Matter for a Sustainable Organic Crop Production Kefyalew Girma Former Assistant Professor/Sustainable Agriculture Specialist Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Fact Sheets are also available on our website at: Hailin Zhang http://osufacts.okstate.edu Professor Warren Roberts Benefi ts of Soil Organic Matter Associate Professor The content of SOM in an organic crop production system is the most important factor because it is the primary nutrient Organic Matter Matters! supplier and soil conditioner. Organic matter in the soil bal- Organic matter (OM) normally constitutes less than 5 ances various chemical and biological processes and helps to percent of most mineral soils. The majority of Oklahoma soils maintain soil quality parameters at an ideal level. It improves actually have only about 1 percent OM, but it is a key factor water infi ltration rate and water-holding capacity. It serves in determining the health of a soil. In principle, all organic as a reservoir of nutrients and water and supplies them to materials can be changed to soil organic matter (SOM) and crops when needed. Organic matter plays a signifi cant role can supply nutrients as well as “condition” the soil. Organic in keeping disease and insect pests at low levels by boosting matter is defi ned as any non-living organism, or product of a crop vigor and modifying the rhizosphere. Soils that are rich living organism on the surface or in the soil. Through decom- in SOM also have a high cation exchange capacity (CEC). position, organic materials added to a soil change to SOM Organic matter contains many negatively charged surfaces while releasing nutrients.
    [Show full text]
  • Handbook of Environmental Regulations for Agribusiness
    CHAP TE R TH R E E : AG R I C H E M I C AL S - PE S TI C I D E & FE RTI LI Z E R Agrichemicals - Pesticide & Fe rt i l i ze r Agrichemical dealers provide crop protection (pesticides) and enhancement (fert i l i zers) products to farmers. So m e facilities manufacture, formulate, package and re p a c k a g e agrichemicals prior to distribution. Others refill agrichemi- cal totes or mini bulk containers for their customers. T h e s e facilities typically have divisions between formulating and packaging operations and between dry and liquid o p e r a t i o n s . Some dealerships are corporately owned and/or managed and re c e i ve agrichemical use, storage and handling infor- mation from their parent company or corporate headquar- ters; some may belong to trade associations that prov i d e information and training on proper enviro n m e n t a l p ro c e d u res; and others may not have information re a d i l y a vailable to them. The following is an ove rv i ew and s u m m a ry of the environmental re q u i rements applying to agrichemical dealers. Ge n e r a l l y, agrichemicals fall under the regulation of the Iowa De p a rtment of Agricultural and Land St ew a rd s h i p (IDALS). A. Which Environmental Laws Apply to Agrichemicals – Pesticide and Fertilizer? 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Integrated Crop-Livestock Production on Slopelands in Korea
    INTEGRATED CROP-LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION ON SLOPELANDS IN KOREA Kee-Jong Lee Dairy Research Division, Livestock Experiment Station Rural Development Administration, Suweon, Korea ABSTRACT Crop-livestock mixed farming was well integrated in the past, when farming in Korea was small-scale and mainly for subsistence. A farming systems research and development ap- proach was followed, to increase the range of products and farm incomes by more intensive uti- lization of available labor and land. However, Korea’s rapid industrialization transformed farm- ing into a commercial, specialized type of production, and created a rural labor shortage. Un- der such circumstances, the production of crops became separated from the production of live- stock. A new research approach should be toward productive and profitable farming which is highly intensive in terms of both capital and technical skill, while being environmentally friendly and part of a sustainable agricultural system. Work by multidiscipliniary teams will be needed to achieve this end. INTRODUCTION stock production. There is a farm labor shortage caused by the migration of rural people to industrial The agriculture of Korea reflects its high cities. The purpose of farming has changed, from population density (44 million people on 99 thou- subsistence to selling in the market place, and there sand km2 land), the hilly or mountaineous topogra- has been progressive specialization which has gradu- phy (only 20.7% is arable land), and its cool temper- ally loosened the crop-livestock links of the past. ate climate with a limited growing season (its land utilization intensity is around 110-150%). The tra- ORGANIZATION OF AGRICULTURAL RE- ditional farming system, based on rice and barley SEARCH IN KOREA production (63% of the arable land is paddy fields), was characterized until the 1960s by semi-subsis- Agricultural research and extension are the tence small-scale crop-livestock farming.
    [Show full text]
  • 71122 Liquid Chisel 0-0-4 BL 2/7/14 10:29 AM Page 1
    71122 Liquid Chisel 0-0-4 BL 2/7/14 10:29 AM Page 1 0-0-4 SOIL CONDITIONER, CONCENTRATED POTASH SOLUTION AND LINE CLEANER GUARANTEED ANALYSIS Soluble Potash (K2O) . 4.00% Derived from potassium hydroxide. ALSO CONTAINS NON-PLANT FOOD INGREDIENTS: 63% . Polyaliphatic acid salts 5% . Alkyl aryl sulfonates (as line cleaner and soil conditioning agents) 68% . Total PEEL BACK BOOK HERE AND RESEAL AFTER OPENING KEEP OUT OF REACH OF CHILDREN WARNING Causes mild skin irritation Causes severe eye irritation Harmful if swallowed Wear protective gloves and Eye/Face protection See Inside Panel for Additional Precautionary Statements SN 091213 WEIGHT PER GAL.: 9.9 lbs. (4.35 kg) Information about the components of this lot of fertilizer may be obtained by writing to Helena Chemical Company, 225 Schilling Boule- vard, Suite 300, Collierville, TN 38017 and giving the lot number which is found on the container. Information regarding the contents and levels of metals in this product is available on the Internet at http://www.aapfco.org/metals.htm Manufactured For HELENA CHEMICAL COMPANY 225 SCHILLING BOULEVARD, SUITE 300 • COLLIERVILLE, TN 38017 OPM #121190 NET CONTENTS: PF-71122 71122 Liquid Chisel 0-0-4 LF 2/7/14 10:30 AM Page 1 (1,1) PRECAUTIONARY STATEMENTS LIQUID CHISEL™ can be applied in a wide va WARNING kler jet and other irrigation systems. It can also BEFORE USING THIS PRODUCT, READ ALL PRECAUTIONS, DIRECTIONS FOR USE, CONDITIONS OF can be applied as a soil spray. When metering SALE – LIMITED WARRANTY AND LIMITATIONS OF LIABILITY AND REMEDIES. ing injection pump or suction regulated line, do n to a public water system without a back siphon Avoid eye contact with formulated product.
    [Show full text]
  • The Paddy Cultivation in District of Lower Perak: Traditional Heritage Until 1957
    Opción, Año 35, Especial No.20 (2019): 817-831 ISSN 1012-1587/ISSNe: 2477-9385 The Paddy Cultivation in District of Lower Perak: Traditional Heritage Until 1957 Khairi Ariffin1 1Faculty of Human Science, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris [email protected] Ramli Saadon2 2Faculty, of Human Science, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris [email protected] Sahul Hamid Mohamed Maiddin3 3Faculty, of Human Science, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris [email protected] Fauziah Che Leh4 4Faculty of Human Science, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris [email protected] Hairy Ibrahim5 5Faculty of Human Science, Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris [email protected] Abstract The research was carried out to identify the development the paddy planting in the district of Lower Perak during the colonial era in 1900 until 1957. The research was carried out by using qualitative methods by analyzing official colonial documents, annual report and writing on paddy cultivation in Perak. The Results showed that the District of Lower Perak had paddy cultivation area that had been developed during the British colonial era. The new settlement has also been developed due to the increase of paddy planting area and construction of the irrigation system. Keywords: Paddy, Traditional, Agriculture, Development, Irrigation Recibido: 10-03-2019 Aceptado: 15-04-2019 818 Khairi Ariffin et al. Opción, Año 35, Especial No.20 (2019): 817-831 El cultivo de arroz en el distrito de Lower Perak: patrimonio tradicional hasta 1957 Resumen La investigación se llevó a cabo para identificar el desarrollo de la siembra de arroz en el distrito de Lower Perak durante la era colonial en 1900 hasta 1957.
    [Show full text]