Newly Sprouted Turf Insect Pests

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Newly Sprouted Turf Insect Pests Newly Sprouted Turf Insect Pests Source: www.TurfMagazine.com Staying one step ahead of dynamic pest populations Click image to enlarge. Two species of European crane flies have now been identified in the U.S. Northeast since its first sighting there in 2004. Photo courtesy David Cappaert, Michigan State University, www.bugwood.org. Pests, including insect pests that destroy turfgrass, continually change, whether in number, kind or status. If they weren’t in constant sway to the rhythm of shifting environments (like all living organisms), we would have them figured out by now. We would know precisely when and how to manage them. However, insect pests represent moving targets. Tracking that dynamism remains a challenge for pest management practitioners. As our action, tolerance and economic thresholds are pushed lower and lower the status of pests can change. Elevated standards and risk adversity call new challenges to the forefront, among them insect pests. Another reason for change is pesticide release. This can come about from the collateral damage posed to non-target organisms. These include the predators and parasitoids that would have helped to suppress pest populations in their own right. Also, pesticide release may occur through a shift from broad- spectrum insecticides to products with a narrower spectrum, wherein secondary pests that might have been controlled along with the target pest, are no longer kept in check, with outbreaks as one possible outcome. Ecological release is another way pests change. This can occur when shifting cultural and agronomic practices end up making the habitat more favorable for the growth of insect populations. Finally, the starkest way is through the arrival and establishment of invasive exotics. Invaders may establish and spread in new territory when they arrive without the pathogens and predators that kept them in check in their native range. Emerging pest complexes For example, both the annual bluegrass weevil and the leatherjackets are notable for their increasing pest status in the eastern United States. The annual bluegrass is an emerging native threat of golf course playing surfaces. The European crane flies are recently established exotic threats to amenity and production turf. As part of efforts to alert and arm the turfgrass industry, each merits a thorough summary of their distribution, expansion and pest status. Six main insect pest complexes can outbreak in cool-season turfgrass and severely affect turf quality and maintenance for its intended aesthetic, recreational or environmental purposes. European crane flies: Tipula oleracea and Tipula paludosa are native to Europe, but each has established in three geographic areas of North America. In the West, both occur from British Columbia south to California. In the East they occur in northern Maine to the Canadian Maritimes, and in the broader Great Lakes from Michigan to Massachusetts. In the eastern United States the first areas of establishments were western New York (2004), eastern Michigan (2005) and Long Island (2006). In the eastern United States T. oleracea is now known from six states, and T. paludosa from three. The more restrictive range of T. paludosa matches its biology wherein gravid females are extremely poor fliers and moreover deposit the majority of their eggs the first day after emergence. Contrast this to the more dispersive T. oleracea whose gravid females are capable fliers and deposit their eggs over several days. While the range of T. oleracea is shaped by points of original establishment and natural dispersal, the range of T. paludosa may be more set by introductions through the movement of infested soil media, such as sod. Based on their known native range in Europe, climate-matching models indicate that spread is inevitable across broad regions of the northern and central United States. Crane fly larvae attack both aboveground and belowground portions of their hosts, which includes all species of managed turfgrasses, in all types of management habitats from home lawns to sports fields, golf courses and sod farms. Late-stage T. oleracea will encroach onto putting greens where they cause damage akin to black cutworms by chewing around the entry of their burrows. Late-stage T. paludosa can cause extreme thinning damage as they graze on foliage, and they may also cause damage akin to white grubs by pruning belowground portions of the plant. Outbreaks are favored under continually humid conditions given that eggs and early stage larvae are extremely susceptible to desiccation. Click image to enlarge. The European crane fly, an established lawn pest in the Pacific Northwest, is now spreading in the Northeast and Midwest, too. Caterpillars, another of the six turf-damaging complexes, are the larvae of moths. They have a series of prolegs and well-developed head capsules with mandibles for chewing foliage. Caterpillars can be grouped into three classes based on general differences in behavior. The cutworms chew through stems above the crown of turfgrass plants and consume the foliage. The black cutworm, Agrotis ipsilon, is among the most problematic species because of its affinity for bentgrass greens in golf course settings. Late-stage larvae will settle into holes on the playing surfaces and forage out at night to scalp half-dollar sized depressions around the entrance. The webworms incorporate webbing into their burrows. There are a number of species that can infest low- to high-maintenance turf from home lawns to sports fields to golf courses. The armyworms are prone to move across the edible landscape shoulder to shoulder once local food runs out. Chinch bugs comprise a third class of turf insect pests, although cool-season turf largely contends with only one species. The hairy chinch bug, Blissus leucopterus, is a small fast-moving insect favored by full sun, well-drained sandy soils and thick thatch. They can become a big pest in home lawns. Adults and nymphs ingest plant sap with piercing sucking mouthparts, which inevitably introduce enzymes into the plant that promote a tissue-killing chlorosis. The white grubs are the quintessential pest complex, well-known and diverse. At least eight species can outbreak in turfgrass. The most problematic are four invasive species, the Asiatic garden beetle (Maladera castanea), European chafer (Amphimallon majale), Japanese beetle (Popillia japonica) and Oriental beetle (Anomala orientalis). Four native species can sometimes erupt, namely the black turfgrass ataenius (Ataenius spretulus), Green June beetle (Cotinis nitida), May or June beetle (Phyllophaga spp) and Northern masked chafer (Cyclocephala borealis). Click image to enlarge. A crane fly egg and four larvel instars. Images courtesy Dr. Daniel Peck. The main form of damage caused by subterranean white grubs is pruning of the roots, which can lead to die-off of the foliage after disruption of water and nutrient flow. The weevil complex consists of beetles that have long snouts tipped by chewing mandibles that the females use to drill into the stems of host plants for egg laying. Larvae begin life as stem borers, and then later move out to feed on the crowns. The bluegrass billbug, Sphenophorus parvulus, is a main species of billbug that is favored in stands of Kentucky bluegrass in the high-mown form. Another high-profile species, the annual bluegrass weevil, Listronotus maculicollis, is favored in stands of short-mown annual bluegrass. The annual bluegrass weevil is a native insect known to occur as part of the local fauna in at least 40 states and four Canadian provinces. First documented as a pest in Connecticut in 1931, outbreaks of the annual bluegrass weevil now challenge turf pros in 15 states throughout the greater U.S. Northeast. It is spreading west and south as it was reported as a pest in Delaware and Maryland in 2002, Virginia 2006, Ohio 2007 and North Carolina 2012. It is not known as a native insect south of North Carolina. The likely reason for its spread probably involves pesticide or ecological release. However, to date, there is no clear explanation for its expanding impact. Nothing is known of annual bluegrass weevil in its native habitat before the introduction of Poa annua and its management as a golf course playing surface. Its westward trajectory across the cool-season zone is probably inevitable while its southward march might be limited by the conditions of warm-season turf The annual bluegrass weevil is a specialist of short-mown annual bluegrass. This grass species, at a low height of cut, provides favorable conditions for population build up and outbreaks on susceptible surfaces. Early-stage larvae are stem borers where they live relatively insulated from the impacts of adverse weather, natural enemies and contact insecticides. Grown too large for their neonatal stems, late-stage larvae move out to the soil surface where they feed on the crowns. Click image to enlarge. The annual bluegrass weevil is an emerging threat to turf in the U.S. East. Ants comprise yet another of the turf pest complexes. One of main culprits is Lasius neoniger, which is most common in the U.S. Northeast. Colonies of this ant throw up multiple entrances around the main nest, small volcano-shaped mounds. The main nest is usually situated in native soil adjacent to affected surfaces. Ants, which nest underground, vigorously tunnel as they scavenge for meals. The mounds they create are more of a problem for golf course maintenance than they are for home lawns or commercial properties. Turfgrass professionals should keep these insect pests on their radar screens. All have the potential to rear their ugly heads on customers’ lawns or on sports fields or golf courses. Moving targets indeed, but knowing what they are and how they’re moving and adapting from location to location will gives the knowledgeable turf specialist good valuable information for managing them. Daniel C.
Recommended publications
  • Effects of Landscape, Intraguild Interactions, and a Neonicotinoid on Natural Enemy and Pest Interactions in Soybeans
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Theses and Dissertations--Entomology Entomology 2016 EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE, INTRAGUILD INTERACTIONS, AND A NEONICOTINOID ON NATURAL ENEMY AND PEST INTERACTIONS IN SOYBEANS Hannah J. Penn University of Kentucky, [email protected] Author ORCID Identifier: http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3692-5991 Digital Object Identifier: https://doi.org/10.13023/ETD.2016.441 Right click to open a feedback form in a new tab to let us know how this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Penn, Hannah J., "EFFECTS OF LANDSCAPE, INTRAGUILD INTERACTIONS, AND A NEONICOTINOID ON NATURAL ENEMY AND PEST INTERACTIONS IN SOYBEANS" (2016). Theses and Dissertations-- Entomology. 30. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/entomology_etds/30 This Doctoral Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology at UKnowledge. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses and Dissertations--Entomology by an authorized administrator of UKnowledge. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STUDENT AGREEMENT: I represent that my thesis or dissertation and abstract are my original work. Proper attribution has been given to all outside sources. I understand that I am solely responsible for obtaining any needed copyright permissions. I have obtained needed written permission statement(s) from the owner(s) of each third-party copyrighted matter to be included in my work, allowing electronic distribution (if such use is not permitted by the fair use doctrine) which will be submitted to UKnowledge as Additional File. I hereby grant to The University of Kentucky and its agents the irrevocable, non-exclusive, and royalty-free license to archive and make accessible my work in whole or in part in all forms of media, now or hereafter known.
    [Show full text]
  • Choate 2015 Crop.Pdf
    Faculty Scholarship Collection The faculty at Allegheny College has made this scholarly article openly available through the Faculty Scholarship Collection (FSC). Article Title Invertebrate communities in spring wheat and the identification of cereal aphid predators through molecular gut content analysis Author(s) Beth A. Choate and Jonathan G. Lundgren Journal Title Crop Protection Citation Choate, Beth A. and Jonathan G. Lundgren. 2015. "Invertebrate communities in spring wheat and the identification of cereal aphid predators through molecular gut content analysis." Crop Protection 77: 110-118. Link to article on publisher’s http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2015.07.021 website Version of article in FSC Postprint Link to this article through FSC https://dspace.allegheny.edu/handle/10456/40034 Date article added to FSC December 23, 2015 Terms of Use © 2015, Elsevier Ltd. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ Information about Allegheny’s Open Access Policy is available at http://sites.allegheny.edu/scholarlycommunication/ For additional articles from this collection, visit https://dspace.allegheny.edu/handle/10456/34250 *Manuscript Click here to view linked References 1 Running Head: Invertebrate communities in spring wheat 2 For Submission to Crop Protection 3 4 5 Title: Invertebrate communities in spring wheat and the identification of cereal aphid predators 6 through molecular gut content analysis. 7 8 Beth A. Choate* and Jonathan G. Lundgren 9 USDA-ARS, North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, Brookings, SD, 57006 10 11 *Address correspondence to 12 Dr. Beth A.
    [Show full text]
  • Agrotis Ipsilon): a Glimpse on Globally Important Crop Pest
    Volume 2021, issue 2, pages 36–42 30 June 2021 https://doi.org/10.33493/scivis.21.02.02 REVIEW ARTICLE An insight into black cutworm (Agrotis ipsilon): A glimpse on globally important crop pest Christopher Rodingpuia*, H. Lalthanzara Department of Life Sciences, Pachhunga University College, Mizoram University, Aizawl 796001, India Many agricultural pests create problems for farmers leading to production loss. Received 11 January 2021 Accepted 15 February 2021 Since agriculture plays an important role in the economy of a nation, controlling and management of such pests is of great importance. Cutworms are notorious *For correspondence: [email protected] agricultural pests infesting a wide variety of crops leading to production loss. Cutworms are distributed worldwide and many species of cutworms have also Contact us: been reported feeding on all kinds of crops. Agrotis ipsilon is one of the most [email protected] common cutworm species prevailing in different continents. Understanding the biology and management of these pests will be of great use for farmers. In this article, brief information on cutworms; specifically A. ipsilon species is highlighted. A brief description of host, migration, control and management of A. ipsilon are also highlighted. Keywords: Caterpillars, infestation, host, parasite, economy, control-management. Introduction Cutworms are caterpillars belonging to the order may extend up to 1 inch (2.5 cm).4 There are Lepidoptera and family Noctuidae; a large family of variations within the genera and may differ moth.1-4 Cutworms got their names from their depending on the region where they are found.1-4 feeding habit of “cutting-off”’ a seedling at ground Most common cutworm species are Agrotis level by chewing through the stem.
    [Show full text]
  • A Phylogenetic Analysis of North American Lasius Ants Based on Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Trevor Manendo University of Vermont
    University of Vermont ScholarWorks @ UVM Graduate College Dissertations and Theses Dissertations and Theses 2008 A Phylogenetic Analysis of North American Lasius Ants Based on Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA Trevor Manendo University of Vermont Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis Recommended Citation Manendo, Trevor, "A Phylogenetic Analysis of North American Lasius Ants Based on Mitochondrial and Nuclear DNA" (2008). Graduate College Dissertations and Theses. 146. https://scholarworks.uvm.edu/graddis/146 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Dissertations and Theses at ScholarWorks @ UVM. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate College Dissertations and Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ UVM. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A phylogenetic analysis of North American Lasius ants based on mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. A Thesis Presented by Trevor Manendo to The Faculty of the Graduate College of The University of Vermont In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science Specializing in Biology May, 2008 Accepted by the Faculty of the Graduate College, The University of Vermont in Partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science specializing in Biology. Thesis Examination Committee: ice President for Research and Dean of Graduate Studies Date: March 19,2008 ABSTRACT The ant genus Lasius (Formicinae) arose during the early Tertiary approximately 65 million years ago. Lasius is one of the most abundant and widely distributed ant genera in the Holarctic region, with 95 described species placed in six subgenera: Acanthomyops, Austrolasius, Cautolasius, Chthonolasius, Dendrolasius and Lasius.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological-Control-Programmes-In
    Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 This page intentionally left blank Biological Control Programmes in Canada 2001–2012 Edited by P.G. Mason1 and D.R. Gillespie2 1Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; 2Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Agassiz, British Columbia, Canada iii CABI is a trading name of CAB International CABI Head Offi ce CABI Nosworthy Way 38 Chauncey Street Wallingford Suite 1002 Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Boston, MA 02111 UK USA Tel: +44 (0)1491 832111 T: +1 800 552 3083 (toll free) Fax: +44 (0)1491 833508 T: +1 (0)617 395 4051 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.cabi.org Chapters 1–4, 6–11, 15–17, 19, 21, 23, 25–28, 30–32, 34–36, 39–42, 44, 46–48, 52–56, 60–61, 64–71 © Crown Copyright 2013. Reproduced with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery. Remaining chapters © CAB International 2013. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electroni- cally, mechanically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Biological control programmes in Canada, 2001-2012 / [edited by] P.G. Mason and D.R. Gillespie. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 978-1-78064-257-4 (alk. paper) 1. Insect pests--Biological control--Canada. 2. Weeds--Biological con- trol--Canada. 3. Phytopathogenic microorganisms--Biological control- -Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Nematodes As Biocontrol Agents This Page Intentionally Left Blank Nematodes As Biocontrol Agents
    Nematodes as Biocontrol Agents This page intentionally left blank Nematodes as Biocontrol Agents Edited by Parwinder S. Grewal Department of Entomology Ohio State University, Wooster, Ohio USA Ralf-Udo Ehlers Department of Biotechnology and Biological Control Institute for Phytopathology Christian-Albrechts-University Kiel, Raisdorf Germany David I. Shapiro-Ilan United States Department of Agriculture Agriculture Research Service Southeastern Fruit and Tree Nut Research Laboratory, Byron, Georgia USA CABI Publishing CABI Publishing is a division of CAB International CABI Publishing CABI Publishing CAB International 875 Massachusetts Avenue Wallingford 7th Floor Oxfordshire OX10 8DE Cambridge, MA 02139 UK USA Tel: þ44 (0)1491 832111 Tel: þ1 617 395 4056 Fax: þ44 (0)1491 833508 Fax: þ1 617 354 6875 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] Web site: www.cabi-publishing.org ßCAB International 2005. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced in any form or by any means, electronically, mech- anically, by photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owners. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library, London, UK. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Nematodes as biocontrol agents / edited by Parwinder S. Grewal, Ralf- Udo Ehlers, David I. Shapiro-Ilan. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN 0-85199-017-7 (alk. paper) 1. Nematoda as biological pest control agents. I. Grewal, Parwinder S. II. Ehlers, Ralf-Udo. III. Shaprio-Ilan, David I. SB976.N46N46 2005 632’.96–dc22 2004030022 ISBN 0 85199 0177 Typeset by SPI Publisher Services, Pondicherry, India Printed and bound in the UK by Biddles Ltd., King’s Lynn This volume is dedicated to Dr Harry K.
    [Show full text]
  • Wax Structures of Scymnus Louisianae Attenuate Aggression from Aphid-Tending Ants
    CHEMICAL ECOLOGY Wax Structures of Scymnus louisianae Attenuate Aggression From Aphid-Tending Ants EZRA G. SCHWARTZBERG,1,2 KENNETH F. HAYNES,1 DOUGLAS W. JOHNSON,1 1 AND GRAYSON C. BROWN Environ. Entomol. 39(4): 1309Ð1314 (2010); DOI: 10.1603/EN09372 ABSTRACT The cuticular wax structures of Scymnus louisianae J. Chapin larvae were investigated as a defense against ant aggression by Lasius neoniger Emery. The presence of wax structures provided signiÞcant defense against ant aggression compared with denuded larvae in that these structures attenuated the aggressive behavior of foraging ants. Furthermore, reapplication of wax dissolved in hexane partially restored defenses associated with intact structures, showing an attenuation of aggression based in part on cuticular wax components rather than solely on physical obstruction to ant mouthparts. KEY WORDS Scymnus louisianae, Aphis glycines, Lasius neoniger, ant-tending Many ants tend aphids and use the collected honeydew wax in promoting physical obstruction to the mouthparts as a sugar source. In return, the aphids beneÞt from the of aphid-tending ants, little has been done to elucidate tending ants (Way 1963, Ho¨lldobler and Wilson 1990). In the role that wax plays in eliciting avoidance behavior or these systems, aphids can beneÞt through reduced pre- in attenuating aggression. SpeciÞcally, physical or chem- dation (Banks 1962) and increased Þtness (Flatt and ical mimicry, camoußage, or repellency has not been Weisser 2000). The relationship between ants and aphids looked at as a potential means of avoidance of ant ag- is often a mutualistic one but ranges from obligatory to gression in the Scymnus beetles. It has been suggested facultative (Dixon 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • Turf Insect Diagnostics -Required Knowledge/Skills
    Turf Insect IPM Kyle Wickings Assistant Professor Department of Entomology Cornell University New York State Agricultural Experiment Station Diversity of arthropods that are pests Scarabaeidae Curculionidae (scarabs/white (weevils) grubs) Coleoptera (beetles) Diptera (flies) Lepidoptera (moths/caterpillars) Hymenoptera Hemiptera (ants) (bugs) Turf insect diagnostics -required knowledge/skills- • Basic Biology – Feeding – Movement (habitat range/dispersal) – Seasonality – Reproduction • Insect identification • Recognition of damage symptoms • Field collection skills – scouting -annual white grubs- • One generation per year • Seasonal activity varies among species (e.g. European chafer) • Feeding preference – detritus to live roots – varies by development and among spp. • Adult activity – feeding vs. non-feeding (JB, AGB vs. EC) soil organic matter roots MSU-ANR Green June Beetle Oriental Beetle Japanese Beetle Why identify scarabs in turf? • white grubs vary in Product Type susceptibility by life stage OrtheneWhite grub treatmentacephate thresholds. • decreases with age GrubGuard chlorpyrifos Number of grubs per 1 Species sq. ft. core DyloxAsiatic garden beetletrichlorfon 18-20 2 • variable efficacy among Black turfgrass ataenius 30-50 3-5 different insecticides Acelepryn chlorantraniliprole European chafer 5-8 Any Safari dinotefuran Green June beetle 5 Any Merit imidacloprid • damage thresholds differ Japanese beetle 8-10 Any AllectusOriental beetle bifenthrin 8 Any OrnazinNorthern maskedazadirachtin chafer 8-12 Any May and June beetle
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Methods of Estimating Biodiversity from Presence-Absence Surveys
    130 Modern Methods of Estimating Biodiversity from Presence-Absence Surveys Robert M. Dorazio1, Nicholas J. Gotelli2 and Aaron M. Ellison3 1U.S. Geological Survey, Southeast Ecological Science Center, Gainesville, Florida 2University of Vermont, Department of Biology, Burlington, Vermont 3Harvard University, Harvard Forest, Petersham, Massachusetts USA 1. Introduction Communities of species are often sampled using so-called “presence-absence” surveys, wherein the apparent presence or absence of each species is recorded. Whereas counts of individuals can be used to estimate species abundances, apparent presence-absence data are often easier to obtain in surveys of multiple species. Presence-absence surveys also may be more accurate than abundance surveys, particularly in communities that contain highly mobile species. A problem with presence-absence data is that observations are usually contaminated by zeros that stem from errors in detection of a species. That is, true zeros, which are associated with the absence of a species, cannot be distinguished from false zeros, which occur when species are present in the vicinity of sampling but not detected. Therefore, it is more accurate to describe apparent presence-absence data as detections and non-detections, but this terminology is seldom used in ecology. Estimates of biodiversity and other community-level attributes can be dramatically affected by errors in detection of each species, particularly since the magnitude of these detection errors generally varies among species (Boulinier et al. 1998). For example, bias in estimates of biodiversity arising from errors in detection is especially pronounced in communities that contain a preponderance of rare or difficult-to-detect species. To eliminate this source of bias, probabilities of species occurrence and detection must be estimated simultaneously using a statistical model of the presence-absence data.
    [Show full text]
  • 37 Lawn Maintenance
    CHAPTER 37 THE BEST CONTROL FOR CAREFREE YARD AND LAWN MAINTENANCE Of the 800,000 insects that live in a typical Florida lawn, less than 1% are pests of mankind and only about a tenth of 1% are pests to the lawn...the rest are beneficial insects! The U. S. EPA estimated in an August 1997 report that each U. S household spent about $20 in 1995 to purchase pesticide poisons for use in their own homes and gardens - this is about double the amount of poison each house bought about 20 years earlier. The American Crop Protection Association noted U. S. sales increased 5.5% from 1996 to 1997 reaching $8.79 billion and export sales of U. S. manufactured ag pesticides increased 10.7% the same year to $2.81 billion. Well maintained plants are less susceptible to disease and insect damage. Plants under stress emit xylene gas which seems to tell the insect pests that the plant is weak and in trouble. “The important thing is not to stop questioning.” The Albert Einstein Archives, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Israel 1387 CAREFREE YARD AND LAWN MAINTENANCE True IPM or Intelligent Pest Management® is the only logical way to safely control pests either inside or outside your building. If I told you to build a building and only allowed you to use one tool, you would think my request was absurd. One needs many different tools, e.g., plans, blueprints, surveys, tape measures, drills, planers, sandpaper, saws, hammers, wrenches, clamps, screwdrivers, pliers, crowbars, vice grips, levels, a plumb, squares, shovels, floats, trowels and many other tools to properly build a building.
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization of Ant Nesting Sites at Pierce Cedar Creek Institute And
    Comparison of Ant (Lasius neoniger and Prenolepis imparis) Nesting Sites at Pierce Cedar Creek Institute and the Influence of Temperature on L. neoniger Activity Kayla Berigan and Bernadette Poirier Mentored by Dr. Robb Bajema Department of Biology, Aquinas College October 28, 2011 Abstract Our study focuses on three objectives: surveying ant biodiversity on Pierce Cedar Creek Institute trails, comparing nesting site characteristics in P. imparis and L. neoniger, and testing the effect of soil surface temperature on activity levels of L. neoniger. We identified twenty-one species of ants on the trail system at PCCI, of which only four were previously documented in Barry County, MI, the site of our study. With regard to nest characteristics, we found that ant hole density in the nests of L. neoniger was significantly greater than in P. imparis. In addition, percent canopy cover in L. neoniger was significantly lower than in P. imparis. Finally, soil surface temperature was shown to have a significant influence on the number of ants excavating throughout the course of a day in one of two L. neoniger nesting sites studied. Introduction Ants are abundant. Ants and termites comprise 1/3 of the rainforest’s entire animal biomass in the Amazonian terra firme rainforest; there are 8 million ants and 1 million termites in each hectare of soil (Hölldobler and Wilson 1990). Closer to home, Mary Talbot found 87 ant species in 23 genera in 5.6 square kilometers of the Edwin S. George reserve in Livingston, Michigan (Talbot 1975, cited in Hölldobler, 1990). Because ants are abundant, they profoundly influence ecosystems; in one study, over half of the sampled seeds in a New York state beech-maple forest were dispersed by ants (Handel et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Nuisance Ants on Golf Courses
    Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online ...Using Science to Benefit Golf University of Kentucky researchers are studying the biology and behavior of mound-build- ing ants, Lasius neoniger, in an effort to develop an effective control strategy to limit their mounding activities on golf course tees and putting greens. Volume 2, Number 22 November 15, 2003 PURPOSE The purpose of USGA Turfgrass and Environmental Research Online is to effectively communicate the results of research projects funded under USGA’s Turfgrass and Environmental Research Program to all who can benefit from such knowledge. Since 1983, the USGA has funded more than 290 projects at a cost of $25 million. The pri- vate, non-profit research program provides funding opportunities to university faculty interested in working on envi- ronmental and turf management problems affecting golf courses. The outstanding playing conditions of today’s golf courses are a direct result of using science to benefit golf. Editor Research Director Jeff Nus, Ph.D. Michael P. Kenna, Ph.D. 904 Highland Drive P.O. Box 2227 Lawrence, KS 66044 Stillwater, OK 74076 [email protected] [email protected] (785) 832-2300 (405) 743-3900 (785) 832-9265 (fax) (405) 743-3910 (fax) USGA Turfgrass and Environmental Research Committee Bruce Richards, Chairman Ron Dodson Kimberly Erusha, Ph.D. Ali Harivandi, Ph.D. Ricky Heine, CGCS Noel Jackson, Ph.D. Michael P. Kenna, Ph.D. Jeff Krans, Ph.D. Pete Landschoot, Ph.D. James Moore Jeff Nus, Ph.D. Tim O’Neill, CGCS Paul Rieke, Ph.D. Robert Shearman, Ph.D. James T. Snow Clark Throssell, Ph.D.
    [Show full text]