DOCSLIB.ORG

Crypto Blast CRYPTO BLAST: Maintaining Our Constructive Crypto Market O

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Crypto Blast CRYPTO BLAST: Maintaining Our Constructive Crypto Market O This document is being provided publicly in the following form. Please subscribe to FSInsight.com for more. Members Area Crypto Blast CRYPTO BLAST: Maintaining our constructive crypto market o Crypto Blast CRYPTO BLAST: Maintaining our constructive crypto market outlook but uncertainty at Binance & OKEX take us from cautious to sell on exchange tokens while we see greater CME market share – that’s GOOD NEWS October 30, 2020 David Grider LEAD DIGITAL ASSET STRATEGIST We are long term bullish on the overall crypto market but see pockets of the industry that oer greater risks than others – exchange tokens are one of them. In a previous report (Regulatory Actions Highlight Risks But Market Remains Bullish), we urged investors to carefully consider risks associated with assets in the oshore exchange token sector, and specifically Binance (BNB), due to its historical allegations and actions taken by US regulators against the derivatives exchange BitMEX. A week later, the CEO of one exchange token we listed, OKEX (OKB), was taken into custody by Chinese police, leaving user funds unavailable for withdraw since October 16th and causing the value of its token to drop by over 30% on the news. Yesterday, a Forbes sta reported on leaked documents that allege Binance “conceived of an elaborate corporate structure designed to intentionally deceive regulators and surreptitiously profit from crypto investors in the United States.” The reports are unconfirmed by the company, but the news underscores our prior concerns from industry rumors and calls for caution on BNB’s token and the sector in general. The total crypto market cap excluding stable coins is roughly $380B, which makes exchange tokens at roughly $9B ~2% of the market a small pocket of risk with Binance (BNB) being ~1/2 – one we have been questioning if, and now believe, investors should avoid for the following reasons: Headline risk of allegations alone is enough to cause a market sell o on uncertainty. BitMEX news has caused many industry venues to enhance verification procedures and remove unallowed customers, which could lower trading and token value. Actual regulatory investigations and actions like those taken against BitMEX caused material harm to its business as 16% of volume dropped the day after the announcement, which would be bad for venues with tokens with their value derived from trading profits and buybacks. If allegations of regulatory violations are investigated and proven to be true, exchanges could face fines (bad for profits, buybacks, and token price) or worse, exchanges could be shut down and assets could go to zero. Yes, the same set of risks apply to banks, and all businesses, but given industry history, recent regulatory actions, and news announcements, we believe now is the time to be conservative in this area. Further, while a crypto bull market will likely bring increased trading, fees, and token values, we would rather own the underlying crypto assets themselves as we believe they have greater upside potential and risk/reward tradeos. Bottom line: We’re recommending investors who own assets in the exchange token sector sell holdings. However, we would cushion against shorting these volatile crypto assets. We’re watching how oshore exchange risks play out for the broader market short term, but not sounding any alarm bells besides the specific sector risk. We think the real positive is that this news likely drives more volume to regulated venues like CME as has happened since the BitMEX actions. If this happens and if there is any regulatory action (we are not making any speculations there is), the market may have already moved on and it may not cause systemic disruptions as happened with BitMEX due to volume migrating after the March price crash. We see that as GOOD NEWS for crypto markets long term. Point 1: Maintaining our positive long-term view on Bitcoin and crypto while eyeing short-term market risks optimistically for now Bitcoin and crypto have been the top performing asset class in 2020. We’re maintaining our constructive long-term view on the overall market and our FY 2020 BTC price target of $16,500. While we believe the situation at Binance and OKEX are worth watching very closely, it’s too early to sound the alarm bells for systemic risks across the space, but certainly see cause for concern within the exchange token sector. Source: Fundstrat Point 2: We’ve been cautious of the risks associated with crypto exchange tokens and have seen further risks mounting with OKEX and Binance ever since In a previous report, we questioned if the exchange token sector was exposed to regulatory risks after the derivatives exchange BitMEX was announced to be under investigation by U.S. authorities. Source: Fundstrat Binance (BNB) is the exchange we discussed specifically given it’s the largest oshore crypto exchange and the 6th largest crypto asset (ex stablecoins) by market cap sitting at ~$4.25B. Source: Fundstrat Given historical allegations against Binance, we have been urging clients to ask the question – Is the risk/reward of paying nearly the same times earning for BNB and major exchanges worth it? At this point, we think the answer is clearly NO. Source: Fundstrat Point 3: OKEX CEO investigation very well may be unrelated to the exchange, but it has been ongoing for 2 weeks, which is bad for its business & OKB token… but we are not sounding any other alarms yet One of the leading Asian exchanges OKEX had its CEO taken into custody by Chinese authorities on an investigation. User exchange balance withdraws were halted after, presumably because the CEO is a private key signer required to approve such transactions. Many have claimed that this investigation has nothing to do with the exchange and that its related to personal matters and that users funds are safe. Without speculating on what caused the investigation or what’s going on, users are surely not happy with their funds being held on the exchange going on two weeks now, and its harmed trading activity which was paused for a period of time, which are both bad for the value of the OKB token. Source: Coindesk Some market participants have found a work around to help users get funds o the exchanges. Trusted parties, usually other exchanges with accounts at OKEX, much like correspondent banks, have allowed users to use the internal transfer mechanism at the exchange to move funds into their account. From there, these trusted parties issue IOU tokens for the assets held at OKEX in their account and deliver them to the owner. They then can sell them on the secondary market to gain access to liquidity. The buyer assumes the counterparty risk of collecting from the exchange once withdraws are opened and usually demands a discount to face value. Thus far, we know of this happening firsthand with TRON and USDT and have heard second hand unconfirmed of it happening with other assets like BTC. Source: Google, Poloniex On some exchanges, we have seen the IOUs for USDT, a stable coin usually valued at $1, trading at a $0.80, but we’ll note on relatively low volume thus far that we’ve seen. But the price represents some combination of investors’ need for liquidity and the markets expectations for OKEX default risks. Source: CoinEX History doesn’t repeat but it often rhymes. Such a scenario happened before back in 2014 right before the infamous exchange Mt. Gox went under following its hack and loss of Bitcoin. An exchange called Bitcoin Builder popped up that allowed users to trade these Bitcoin IOUs, as can be seen from the 2014 article below. Source: Coindesk What gives us some level of comfort around the situation at OKEX is that the market doesn’t seem to be pricing the same default risk in after two weeks as it did for Mt. Gox back in 2014. At the time, the price of Bitcoin on Mt. Gox was trading at a much more significant discount to Bitcoin on other exchanges than the OKEX USDT IOU discounts we’re seeing today. Source: Bitcoin Charts Point 4: Bitcoin rallied 25% after OKEX announced no withdraws, with it holding ~7% of BTC on exchanges, we wonder how much this supply limitation fueled the move, and question what that means for prices next? Over the short term, for tactical investors, we are considering what eect the reduction in BTC supply locked on the exchange might have had on this recent price rally. Bitcoin has seen its price rise by ~25% since the withdraw restriction was announced, while the price ok the OKEX exchange token OKB has fallen by roughly the same amount. Source: Trading View We estimate Bitcoin held on the OKEX exchange is 7% of all exchange balance supply, which would be a material portion of the traded float and could lead to short term selling pressure if pent up BTC becomes able to move to other exchanges and be liquidated. Source: Viewbase, Coinmetrics, Glassnode, CryptoQuant, Chain.info While trading has resumed on the platform, thus far the only fiat pair enabled have been the CNY, INR and VND, while withdraws have remained closed. Point 5: New accusations against Binance are very serious and potentially as bad or worse than those against BitMEX if proven, but headline risk is enough to cause investors to flee as they did with BitMEX Source: Forbes The Forbes article alleges Binance designed a structure meant evade regulators with its on shore exchange never intended to capture material profits and value. One of the risks we highlighted in our prior note was that very little of the exchange volume at Binance comes from its US based exchange.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Consent Order: HDR Global Trading Limited, Et Al
    Case 1:20-cv-08132-MKV Document 62 Filed 08/10/21 Page 1 of 22 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK USDC SDNY DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED COMMODITY FUTURES TRADING DOC #: COMMISSION, DATE FILED: 8/10/2021 Plaintiff v. Case No. 1:20-cv-08132 HDR GLOBAL TRADING LIMITED, 100x Hon. Mary Kay Vyskocil HOLDINGS LIMITED, ABS GLOBAL TRADING LIMITED, SHINE EFFORT INC LIMITED, HDR GLOBAL SERVICES (BERMUDA) LIMITED, ARTHUR HAYES, BENJAMIN DELO, and SAMUEL REED, Defendants CONSENT ORDER FOR PERMANENT INJUNCTION, CIVIL MONETARY PENALTY, AND OTHER EQUITABLE RELIEF AGAINST DEFENDANTS HDR GLOBAL TRADING LIMITED, 100x HOLDINGS LIMITED, SHINE EFFORT INC LIMITED, and HDR GLOBAL SERVICES (BERMUDA) LIMITED I. INTRODUCTION On October 1, 2020, Plaintiff Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission” or “CFTC”) filed a Complaint against Defendants HDR Global Trading Limited (“HDR”), 100x Holdings Limited (100x”), ABS Global Trading Limited (“ABS”), Shine Effort Inc Limited (“Shine”), and HDR Global Services (Bermuda) Limited (“HDR Services”), all doing business as “BitMEX” (collectively “BitMEX”) as well as BitMEX’s co-founders Arthur Hayes (“Hayes”), Benjamin Delo (“Delo”), and Samuel Reed (“Reed”), (collectively “Defendants”), seeking injunctive and other equitable relief, as well as the imposition of civil penalties, for violations of the Commodity Exchange Act (“Act”), 7 U.S.C. §§ 1–26 (2018), and the Case 1:20-cv-08132-MKV Document 62 Filed 08/10/21 Page 2 of 22 Commission’s Regulations (“Regulations”) promulgated thereunder, 17 C.F.R. pts. 1–190 (2020). (“Complaint,” ECF No. 1.)1 II. CONSENTS AND AGREEMENTS To effect settlement of all charges alleged in the Complaint against Defendants HDR, 100x, ABS, Shine, and HDR Services (“Settling Defendants”) without a trial on the merits or any further judicial proceedings, Settling Defendants: 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Short Selling Attack: a Self-Destructive but Profitable 51% Attack on Pos Blockchains
    Short Selling Attack: A Self-Destructive But Profitable 51% Attack On PoS Blockchains Suhyeon Lee and Seungjoo Kim CIST (Center for Information Security Technologies), Korea University, Korea Abstract—There have been several 51% attacks on Proof-of- With a PoS, the attacker needs to obtain 51% of the Work (PoW) blockchains recently, including Verge and Game- cryptocurrency to carry out a 51% attack. But unlike PoW, Credits, but the most noteworthy has been the attack that saw attacker in a PoS system is highly discouraged from launching hackers make off with up to $18 million after a successful double spend was executed on the Bitcoin Gold network. For this reason, 51% attack because he would have to risk of depreciation the Proof-of-Stake (PoS) algorithm, which already has advantages of his entire stake amount to do so. In comparison, bad of energy efficiency and throughput, is attracting attention as an actor in a PoW system will not lose their expensive alternative to the PoW algorithm. With a PoS, the attacker needs mining equipment if he launch a 51% attack. Moreover, to obtain 51% of the cryptocurrency to carry out a 51% attack. even if a 51% attack succeeds, the value of PoS-based But unlike PoW, attacker in a PoS system is highly discouraged from launching 51% attack because he would have to risk losing cryptocurrency will fall, and the attacker with the most stake his entire stake amount to do so. Moreover, even if a 51% attack will eventually lose the most. For these reasons, those who succeeds, the value of PoS-based cryptocurrency will fall, and attempt to attack 51% of the PoS blockchain will not be the attacker with the most stake will eventually lose the most.
    [Show full text]
  • Bitmex Xbt Price on Spreadsheet
    Bitmex Xbt Price On Spreadsheet Follow-up Barty sometimes enounces his Beaulieu stalwartly and configure so apologetically! If unteachable or goadSolutrean her Stafford Troy usually insufferably, risks his Salopian roneos prickle and uniplanar. amok or solemnized proximo and farther, how piniest is Zeb? Uli BitMEX Topics covered in Lesson 2 Cash an Carry. Bitmex Bans Its sister Country Trustnodes. Bitmex XBTUSD historical price data order books and OHLCV candlesticks. American authorities police criminal charges on Thursday against the owners of kiss of surgery world's biggest cryptocurrency trading exchanges BitMEX accusing them of allowing the Hong Kong-based company to launder money and engage in other illegal transactions. This call does return Bitcoin traded volume in XBT over since last 24h on Kraken. The Calculator can show his current ProfitLoss PnL Target prices at set. 6 July 2019 AntiLiquidation is a BitMEX Anti-Liquidation Tool Position Calculator. 24 Hours BitMex Liquidation Data of XBTUSD ETHUSD and All Supported Asset. BTC USD Bitfinex Historical Data Investingcom. It is Buyer's move bitcoin analysis price bitmex inverse contract process are playing. For market trades fees are 0075 of your stop for both entry exit So total fees on a 1000 trade with 100x leverage are 150 100 x 1000 x 000075 x 2 Fees are 15 in industry case. Bitcoin Price Bitmex and Coinbase Trading News Value of Wallet Bitcoin. In a dramatic day for Bitcoin BTC bulls pushed the price of BitMEX's XBT. Demo Binance Huobi Bitmex And Others In Spreadsheet Using Api Excel. The price on an ma in any such levels indicator would come under cftc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Bitcoin Trading Ecosystem
    ArcaneReport(PrintReady).qxp 21/07/2021 14:43 Page 1 THE INSTITUTIONAL CRYPTO CURRENCY EXCHANGE INSIDE FRONT COVER: BLANK ArcaneReport(PrintReady).qxp 21/07/2021 14:43 Page 3 The Bitcoin Trading Ecosystem Arcane Research LMAX Digital Arcane Research is a part of Arcane Crypto, bringing LMAX Digital is the leading institutional spot data-driven analysis and research to the cryptocurrency exchange, run by the LMAX Group, cryptocurrency space. After launch in August 2019, which also operates several leading FCA regulated Arcane Research has become a trusted brand, trading venues for FX, metals and indices. Based on helping clients strengthen their credibility and proven, proprietary technology from LMAX Group, visibility through research reports and analysis. In LMAX Digital allows global institutions to acquire, addition, we regularly publish reports, weekly market trade and hold the most liquid digital assets, Bitcoin, updates and articles to educate and share insights. Ethereum, Litecoin, Bitcoin Cash and XRP, safely and securely. Arcane Crypto develops and invests in projects, focusing on bitcoin and digital assets. Arcane Trading with all the largest institutions globally, operates a portfolio of businesses, spanning the LMAX Digital is a primary price discovery venue, value chain for digital nance. As a group, Arcane streaming real-time market data to the industry’s deliver services targeting payments, investment, and leading indices and analytics platforms, enhancing trading, in addition to a media and research leg. the quality of market information available to investors and enabling a credible overview of the Arcane has the ambition to become a leading player spot crypto currency market. in the digital assets space by growing the existing businesses, invest in cutting edge projects, and LMAX Digital is regulated by the Gibraltar Financial through acquisitions and consolidation.
    [Show full text]
  • Balancing Privacy and Accountability in Digital Payment Methods Using Zk-Snarks
    1 Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics & Computer Science Balancing privacy and accountability in digital payment methods using zk-SNARKs Tariq Bontekoe M.Sc. Thesis October 2020 Supervisors: prof. dr. M. J. Uetz (UT) dr. M. H. Everts (TNO/UT) dr. B. Manthey (UT) dr. A. Peter (UT) Department Applied Mathematics Discrete Mathematics & Mathematical Programming Department Computer Science 4TU Cyber Security Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science University of Twente Preface This thesis concludes my seven years (and a month) as a student. During all these years I have certainly enjoyed myself and feel proud of everything I have done and achieved. Not only have I completed a bachelor’s in Applied Mathematics, I have also spent a year as a board member of my study association W.S.G. Abacus, spent a lot of time as a student assistant, and have made friends for life. I have really enjoyed creating this final project, in all its ups and downs, that concludes not only my master’s in Applied Mathematics but also that in Computer Science. This work was carried out at TNO in Groningen in the department Cyber Security & Ro- bustness. My time there has been amazing and the colleagues in the department have made that time even better. I am also happy to say that I will continue my time there soon. There are quite some people I should thank for helping my realise this thesis. First of all, my main supervisor Maarten who helped me with his constructive feedback, knowledge of blockchains and presence at both TNO and my university.
    [Show full text]
  • 3Rd Global Cryptoasset Benchmarking Study
    3RD GLOBAL CRYPTOASSET BENCHMARKING STUDY Apolline Blandin, Dr. Gina Pieters, Yue Wu, Thomas Eisermann, Anton Dek, Sean Taylor, Damaris Njoki September 2020 supported by Disclaimer: Data for this report has been gathered primarily from online surveys. While every reasonable effort has been made to verify the accuracy of the data collected, the research team cannot exclude potential errors and omissions. This report should not be considered to provide legal or investment advice. Opinions expressed in this report reflect those of the authors and not necessarily those of their respective institutions. TABLE OF CONTENTS FOREWORDS ..................................................................................................................................................4 RESEARCH TEAM ..........................................................................................................................................6 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................................................7 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................... 11 METHODOLOGY ........................................................................................................................................ 14 SECTION 1: INDUSTRY GROWTH INDICATORS .........................................................................17 Employment figures ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................17
    [Show full text]
  • Trading and Arbitrage in Cryptocurrency Markets
    Trading and Arbitrage in Cryptocurrency Markets Igor Makarov1 and Antoinette Schoar∗2 1London School of Economics 2MIT Sloan, NBER, CEPR December 15, 2018 ABSTRACT We study the efficiency, price formation and segmentation of cryptocurrency markets. We document large, recurrent arbitrage opportunities in cryptocurrency prices relative to fiat currencies across exchanges, which often persist for weeks. Price deviations are much larger across than within countries, and smaller between cryptocurrencies. Price deviations across countries co-move and open up in times of large appreciations of the Bitcoin. Countries that on average have a higher premium over the US Bitcoin price also see a bigger widening of arbitrage deviations in times of large appreciations of the Bitcoin. Finally, we decompose signed volume on each exchange into a common and an idiosyncratic component. We show that the common component explains up to 85% of Bitcoin returns and that the idiosyncratic components play an important role in explaining the size of the arbitrage spreads between exchanges. ∗Igor Makarov: Houghton Street, London WC2A 2AE, UK. Email: [email protected]. An- toinette Schoar: 62-638, 100 Main Street, Cambridge MA 02138, USA. Email: [email protected]. We thank Yupeng Wang and Yuting Wang for outstanding research assistance. We thank seminar participants at the Brevan Howard Center at Imperial College, EPFL Lausanne, European Sum- mer Symposium in Financial Markets 2018 Gerzensee, HSE Moscow, LSE, and Nova Lisbon, as well as Anastassia Fedyk, Adam Guren, Simon Gervais, Dong Lou, Peter Kondor, Gita Rao, Norman Sch¨urhoff,and Adrien Verdelhan for helpful comments. Andreas Caravella, Robert Edstr¨omand Am- bre Soubiran provided us with very useful information about the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Crypto Asset Market Coverage Initiation: Trading
    Sherwin Dowlat [email protected] Michael Hodapp [email protected] CRYPTO ASSET MARKET COVERAGE INITIATION: % from Days Name Price ATH TRADING & CUSTODY ATH Since ATH SEPTEMBER 18, 2018 BTC $6,270 $20,089 (69%) 274 ETH $197.86 $1,432 (86%) 247 XRP $.273 $3.84 (93%) 256 Overview BCH $420.06 $4,330 (90%) 271 EOS $4.90 $22.89 (79%) 141 As investors continue to learn about the cryptoasset market LTC $52.34 $375.29 (86%) 272 class, two of the biggest areas of uncertainty have thus far * Refers to Market Capitalization estimate, calculated using 2050 estimated supply using respective network inflation schedules been 1) trading – how to acquire and exchange the assets, and 2) custody – how to securely store the assets. While there is largely a solid market for consumer trading and Market Cap ($MM) 30D % 90D % 52-Wk % Launch Name custody, these products do not always meet the needs of Current 2050 Implied* G/L G/L G/L Year institutional investors, whose solutions must meet higher BTC $108,304 $131,567 (3%) (7%) 45% 2009 burdens relative to security and regulatory compliance. ETH $20,186 $29,081 (35%) (62%) (30%) 2015 XRP $10,874 $27,316 (19%) (50%) 38% 2013 In this report, we will provide a breakdown of the current BCH $7,290 $8,814 (27%) (53%) (2%) 2017 $4,438 $7,150 (6%) (54%) 643% 2018 landscape for 1) exchanges, 2) OTC providers, 3) consumer EOS LTC $3,053 $4,390 (10%) (47%) (4%) 2011 custody and 4) institutional custody solutions. * Refers to Market Capitalization estimate, calculated using 2050 estimated supply using respective network inflation schedules.
    [Show full text]
  • SBN 206441) CONSENSUS LAW 2 5245 Av
    Case 3:20-cv-08034 Document 1 Filed 11/13/20 Page 1 of 197 1 Pavel I. Pogodin, Ph.D., Esq. (SBN 206441) CONSENSUS LAW 2 5245 Av. Isla Verde 3 Suite 302 Carolina, PR 00979 4 United States of America Telephone: (650) 469-3750 5 Facsimile: (650) 472-8961 Email: [email protected] 6 7 Attorneys for Plaintiff Păun Gabriel-Razvan 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 12 Păun Gabriel-Razvan, Case No. 3:20-cv-08034 13 COMPLAINT FOR CONSPIRACY TO Plaintiff, CONDUCT AND CONDUCTING 14 ENTERPRISE’S AFFAIRS THROUGH A PATTERN OF RACKETEERING 15 ACTIVITY IN VIOLATION OF 18 v. U.S.C. §§ 1962(d) AND (c) (RICO), 16 CRYPTOCURRENCY MARKET MANIPULATION IN VIOLATION OF 7 17 U.S.C. § 9(1) (USE OF DECEPTIVE OR HDR Global Trading Limited (A.K.A. MANIPULATIVE DEVICE), 7 U.S.C. §§ 18 BitMEX), ABS Global Trading Limited, 9(3) AND 13(a)(2) (PRICE Grape Park LLC, Mark Sweep LLC, MANIPULATION), PRINCIPAL 19 Unknown Exchange, Arthur Hayes, Ben Delo, AGENT LIABILITY, AIDING AND Samuel Reed, Agata Maria Reed (A.K.A. ABETTING PRICE MANIPULATION 20 Agata Maria Kasza), Barbara A. Reed and IN VIOLATION OF 7 U.S.C. § 25(a)(1), Trace L. Reed, NEGLIGENCE, FRAUD, CIVIL 21 CONSPIRACY, UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES IN VIOLATION OF CAL. 22 Defendants. BUS. & PROF. CODE §§ 17200 ET SEQ, UNJUST ENRICHMENT 23 (RESTITUTION), CONSTRUCTIVE TRUST, ACCOUNTING, 24 CONVERSION, AIDING AND ABETTING CONVERSION, AIDING 25 AND ABBETING FRAUD AND VIOLATION OF CAL.
    [Show full text]
  • Bitwise Asset Management, Inc., NYSE Arca, Inc., and Vedder Price P.C
    MEMORANDUM TO: File No. SR-NYSEArca-2019-01 FROM: Lauren Yates Office of Market Supervision, Division of Trading and Markets DATE: March 20, 2019 SUBJECT: Meeting with Bitwise Asset Management, Inc., NYSE Arca, Inc., and Vedder Price P.C. __________________________________________________________________________ On March 19, 2019, Elizabeth Baird, Christian Sabella, Natasha Greiner, Michael Coe, Edward Cho, Neel Maitra, David Remus (by phone), and Lauren Yates from the Division of Trading and Markets; Charles Garrison, Johnathan Ingram, Cindy Oh, Andrew Schoeffler (by phone), Amy Starr (by phone), Sara Von Althann, and David Walz (by phone) from the Division of Corporation Finance; and David Lisitza (by phone) from the Office of General Counsel, met with the following individuals: Teddy Fusaro, Bitwise Asset Management, Inc. Matt Hougan, Bitwise Asset Management, Inc. Hope Jarkowski, NYSE Arca, Inc. Jamie Patturelli, NYSE Arca, Inc. David DeGregorio, NYSE Arca, Inc. (by phone) Tom Conner, Vedder Price P.C. John Sanders, Vedder Price P.C. The discussion concerned NYSE Arca, Inc.’s proposed rule change to list and trade, pursuant to NYSE Arca Rule 8.201-E, shares of the Bitwise Bitcoin ETF Trust. Bitwise Asset Management, Inc. also provided the attached presentation to the Commission Staff. Bitwise Asset Management Presentation to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission March 19, 2019 About Bitwise 01 VENTURE INVESTORS Pioneer: Created the world’s first crypto index fund. 02 TEAM BACKGROUNDS Specialist: The only asset we invest in is crypto. 03 Experienced: Deep expertise in crypto, asset management and ETFs. 2 Today’s Speakers Teddy Fusaro Matt Hougan Chief Operating Officer Global Head of Research Previously Senior Vice President and Senior Previously CEO of Inside ETFs.
    [Show full text]
  • Bitcoin's Investment Thesis
    Edison Explains Bitcoin’s investment thesis Part three: Durability and transferability Negative Positive X Cryptocurrencies – irrational recourse. The story of a German programmer who forgot hype or financial revolution? the password to his hard drive containing more than US$200m worth of BTC made the headlines earlier this Bitcoin (BTC) and other digital year. assets have been making the headlines in recent months, Multiple solutions to protect private keys are polarising the investment community with an equal number available of strong advocates and fierce critics (even within the same However, we note that the storage solutions currently financial institution or research house). Moreover, valid available for digital assets eliminate this risk (the analysis, backed by in-depth research, is mixed up with programmer received his BTC back in 2011, according to ideological, poorly researched conclusions both for and The New York Times, when these solutions were not widely against the theme. We have decided to look at both sides available). Retail investors who decide to use self-custody of the same (Bit)coin to extract the investment thesis for their digital assets can choose from a range of dedicated behind this new asset class. Each part of this Edison online and software wallets which, on set-up, ask the user Explains series looks at one feature of BTC and the to create a so-called 'recovery seed' or 'recovery phrase'. broader cryptocurrency landscape (broadly referred to as This is basically a list of 12, 18 or 24 words (preferably kept ‘altcoins’). We conclude by summarising our subjective offline, eg written down and stored in multiple physical view on how positive or negative we believe the feature is locations) that contain all the information required to for BTC’s investment thesis.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change to List and Trade Shares of the Wisdomtree Bitcoin Trust Under BZX Rule 14.11(E)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares
    SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION (Release No. 34-91521; File No. SR-CboeBZX-2021-024) April 9, 2021 Self-Regulatory Organizations; Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc.; Notice of Filing of a Proposed Rule Change to List and Trade Shares of the WisdomTree Bitcoin Trust under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”),1 and Rule 19b-4 thereunder,2 notice is hereby given that on March 26, 2021, Cboe BZX Exchange, Inc. (the “Exchange” or “BZX”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I, II, and III below, which Items have been prepared by the Exchange. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons. I. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change The Exchange rule change to list and trade shares of the WisdomTree Bitcoin Trust (the “Trust”),3 under BZX Rule 14.11(e)(4), Commodity-Based Trust Shares. The shares of the Trust are referred to herein as the “Shares.” The text of the proposed rule change is also available on the Exchange’s website (http://markets.cboe.com/us/equities/regulation/rule_filings/bzx/), at the Exchange’s Office of the Secretary, and at the Commission’s Public Reference Room. 1 15 U.S.C. 78s(b)(1). 2 17 CFR 240.19b-4. 3 The Trust was formed as a Delaware statutory trust on March 8, 2021 and is operated as a grantor trust for U.S.
    [Show full text]