Hardenbergia Violacea (Purple Coral Pea) Climbing Or Trailing

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Hardenbergia Violacea (Purple Coral Pea) Climbing Or Trailing Hardenbergia violacea (Purple coral pea) Climbing or trailing. Leaves from ovate to lanceolate, deep green. From the end of winter to the beginning of summer it produces hanging racemes, 10-15cm long, of mauve or lilac flowers. Requires moderately fertile,moist but well drained soil which is not calcareous. Excellent for covering pillars, pergolas and walls.Does best at coast. Landscape Information Pronounciation: har-den-BERG-ia vio-LA-ce Plant Type: Vine Origin: Australia Heat Zones: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 Hardiness Zones: 9, 10, 11, 12 Uses: Screen, Espalier, Container, Facade, Trellis, Green Wall Size/Shape Growth Rate: Moderate Tree Shape: Weeping Canopy Symmetry: Irregular Canopy Density: Dense Plant Image Canopy Texture: Coarse Height at Maturity: 5 to 8 m Spread at Maturity: 3 to 5 meters Time to Ultimate Height: 5 to 10 Years Hardenbergia violacea (Purple coral pea) Botanical Description Foliage Leaf Arrangement: Alternate Leaf Venation: Pinnate Leaf Persistance: Evergreen Leaf Type: Simple Leaf Blade: Less than 5 Leaf Shape: Linear Leaf Margins: Entire Leaf Textures: Medium Leaf Scent: No Fragance Color(growing season): Green Color(changing season): Green Flower Flower Showiness: True Flower Size Range: 1.5 - 3 Flower Type: Panicle Flower Sexuality: Monoecious (Bisexual) Flower Scent: No Fragance Flower Color: Purple, White Seasons: Spring, Summer Trunk Trunk Susceptibility to Breakage: Generally Flower Image resists breakage Number of Trunks: Multi-Trunked Trunk Esthetic Values: Not Showy Fruit Fruit Type: Legume Fruit Showiness: True Fruit Colors: Black Seasons: Spring, Summer Hardenbergia violacea (Purple coral pea) Horticulture Management Tolerance Frost Tolerant: No Heat Tolerant: Yes Drought Tolerant: Yes Requirements Soil Requirements: Loam, Sand Soil Ph Requirements: Acidic, Neutral Water Requirements: Low Light Requirements: Full, Part Management Toxity: No Pruning Requirement: Little needed, to Leaf Image develop a strong structure Fruit/ Leaves/ Flowers litter: No Surface Rooting: No Life Span: Less than 25 Edible Parts: None Pests: Mites, Whitefly Plant Propagations: Seed, Cutting MORE IMAGES Other Image.
Recommended publications
  • A Synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) James Andrew Lackey Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Retrospective Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 1977 A synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) James Andrew Lackey Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Lackey, James Andrew, "A synopsis of Phaseoleae (Leguminosae, Papilionoideae) " (1977). Retrospective Theses and Dissertations. 5832. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/5832 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Retrospective Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INFORMATION TO USERS This material was produced from a microfilm copy of the original document. While the most advanced technological means to photograph and reproduce this document have been used, the quality is heavily dependent upon the quality of the original submitted. The following explanation of techniques is provided to help you understand markings or patterns which may appear on this reproduction. 1.The sign or "target" for pages apparently lacking from the document photographed is "Missing Page(s)". If it was possible to obtain the missing page(s) or section, they are spliced into the film along with adjacent pages. This may have necessitated cutting thru an image and duplicating adjacent pages to insure you complete continuity. 2. When an image on the film is obliterated with a large round black mark, it is an indication that the photographer suspected that the copy may have moved during exposure and thus cause a blurred image.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardenbergia Violacea
    Hardenbergia violacea Family: Fabaceae subfamily Faboideae Distribution: A widespread species occurring in Queensland, New South Wales, Victoria, Tasmania and South Australia. It occurs in a variety of habitats from coast to mountains, usually in open forest/woodland and sometimes in heath. Common Native sarsaparilla; Purple coral pea Name: Derivation of Hardenbergia...after Franziska Countess Name: von Hardenberg. violacea...referring to the typical flower colour. Conservation Not considered to be at risk in the wild. Status: General Description: Hardenbergia is a small genus of three species, the most common and best known of which is Hardenbergia violacea. Hardenbergia violacea is usually a climbing plant whose branches twist around the stems of other plants. It is moderately vigorous but rarely covers other plants so extensively as to cause damage. Shrubby forms without any climbing tendency are known. The leaves are dark, glossy green with prominent veins and are 75-100 mm in length. Typical purple-flowered form of Hardenbergia violacea (top) and a pink-flowered form (bottom) Photos: Brian Walters The flowers, which appear in winter and spring, are usually violet in colour but pink, white and other colours are sometimes found. The flowers are the typical "pea" shape consisting of 4 petals; the "standard", the "keel" and two "wings" as shown in the diagram below. A number of colour varients of H.violacea are becoming generally available in nurseries, with some imaginative cultivar names attached - for example: • "Happy Wanderer" (very vigorous, purple flowers) • "Pink Fizz" (pink flowers - climbing, not vigorous) • "Mini Haha" (compact, shrubby - purple flowers) • "Alba" (white flowers) • "Free 'n' Easy" (whitish flowers, vigorous climber) • "Blushing Princess" (shrubby - mauve-pink flowers) • "Purple Falls" (trailing - purple flowers, good for rockeries) • "Bushy Blue" (shrubby - blue-purple flowers).
    [Show full text]
  • Revision of the Australian Bee Genus Trichocolletes Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Colletidae: Paracolletini)
    AUSTRALIAN MUSEUM SCIENTIFIC PUBLICATIONS Batley, Michael, and Terry F. Houston, 2012. Revision of the Australian bee genus Trichocolletes Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Colletidae: Paracolletini). Records of the Australian Museum 64(1): 1–50. [Published 23 May 2012]. http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.64.2012.1589 ISSN 0067-1975 Published by the Australian Museum, Sydney nature culture discover Australian Museum science is freely accessible online at http://publications.australianmuseum.net.au 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia © The Authors, 2012. Journal compilation © Australian Museum, Sydney, 2012 Records of the Australian Museum (2012) Vol. 64: 1–50. ISSN 0067-1975 http://dx.doi.org/10.3853/j.0067-1975.64.2012.1589 Revision of the Australian Bee Genus Trichocolletes Cockerell (Hymenoptera: Colletidae: Paracolletini) Michael Batley1* and terry F. houston2 1 Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia [email protected] 2 Western Australian Museum, Locked Bag 49, Welshpool D.C. WA 6986, Australia [email protected] aBstract. The endemic Australian bee genus Trichocolletes is revised. Forty species are recognised, including twenty-three new species: Trichocolletes aeratus, T. albigenae, T. avialis, T. brachytomus, T. brunilabrum, T. capillosus, T. centralis, T. dundasensis, T. fuscus, T. gelasinus, T. grandis, T. lacaris, T. leucogenys, T. luteorufus, T. macrognathus, T. micans, T. nitens, T. orientalis, T. platyprosopis, T. serotinus, T. simus, T. soror and T. tuberatus. Four new synonymies are proposed: Paracolletes marginatus lucidus Cockerell, 1929 = T. chrysostomus (Cockerell, 1929); T. daviesiae Rayment, 1931 = T. venustus (Smith, 1862); T. marginatulus Michener, 1965 = T. sericeus (Smith, 1862); T. nigroclypeatus Rayment, 1929 = T.
    [Show full text]
  • Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List
    Arizona Department of Water Resources Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Official Regulatory List for the Phoenix Active Management Area Fourth Management Plan Arizona Department of Water Resources 1110 West Washington St. Ste. 310 Phoenix, AZ 85007 www.azwater.gov 602-771-8585 Phoenix Active Management Area Low-Water-Use/Drought-Tolerant Plant List Acknowledgements The Phoenix AMA list was prepared in 2004 by the Arizona Department of Water Resources (ADWR) in cooperation with the Landscape Technical Advisory Committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transporation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. ADWR extends its gratitude to the following members of the Plant List Advisory Committee for their generous contribution of time and expertise: Rita Jo Anthony, Wild Seed Judy Mielke, Logan Simpson Design John Augustine, Desert Tree Farm Terry Mikel, U of A Cooperative Extension Robyn Baker, City of Scottsdale Jo Miller, City of Glendale Louisa Ballard, ASU Arboritum Ron Moody, Dixileta Gardens Mike Barry, City of Chandler Ed Mulrean, Arid Zone Trees Richard Bond, City of Tempe Kent Newland, City of Phoenix Donna Difrancesco, City of Mesa Steve Priebe, City of Phornix Joe Ewan, Arizona State University Janet Rademacher, Mountain States Nursery Judy Gausman, AZ Landscape Contractors Assn. Rick Templeton, City of Phoenix Glenn Fahringer, Earth Care Cathy Rymer, Town of Gilbert Cheryl Goar, Arizona Nurssery Assn. Jeff Sargent, City of Peoria Mary Irish, Garden writer Mark Schalliol, ADOT Matt Johnson, U of A Desert Legum Christy Ten Eyck, Ten Eyck Landscape Architects Jeff Lee, City of Mesa Gordon Wahl, ADWR Kirti Mathura, Desert Botanical Garden Karen Young, Town of Gilbert Cover Photo: Blooming Teddy bear cholla (Cylindropuntia bigelovii) at Organ Pipe Cactus National Monutment.
    [Show full text]
  • Combined Phylogenetic Analyses Reveal Interfamilial Relationships and Patterns of floral Evolution in the Eudicot Order Fabales
    Cladistics Cladistics 1 (2012) 1–29 10.1111/j.1096-0031.2012.00392.x Combined phylogenetic analyses reveal interfamilial relationships and patterns of floral evolution in the eudicot order Fabales M. Ange´ lica Belloa,b,c,*, Paula J. Rudallb and Julie A. Hawkinsa aSchool of Biological Sciences, Lyle Tower, the University of Reading, Reading, Berkshire RG6 6BX, UK; bJodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 3DS, UK; cReal Jardı´n Bota´nico-CSIC, Plaza de Murillo 2, CP 28014 Madrid, Spain Accepted 5 January 2012 Abstract Relationships between the four families placed in the angiosperm order Fabales (Leguminosae, Polygalaceae, Quillajaceae, Surianaceae) were hitherto poorly resolved. We combine published molecular data for the chloroplast regions matK and rbcL with 66 morphological characters surveyed for 73 ingroup and two outgroup species, and use Parsimony and Bayesian approaches to explore matrices with different missing data. All combined analyses using Parsimony recovered the topology Polygalaceae (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). Bayesian analyses with matched morphological and molecular sampling recover the same topology, but analyses based on other data recover a different Bayesian topology: ((Polygalaceae + Leguminosae) (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). We explore the evolution of floral characters in the context of the more consistent topology: Polygalaceae (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae)). This reveals synapomorphies for (Leguminosae (Quillajaceae + Suri- anaceae)) as the presence of free filaments and marginal ⁄ ventral placentation, for (Quillajaceae + Surianaceae) as pentamery and apocarpy, and for Leguminosae the presence of an abaxial median sepal and unicarpellate gynoecium. An octamerous androecium is synapomorphic for Polygalaceae. The development of papilionate flowers, and the evolutionary context in which these phenotypes appeared in Leguminosae and Polygalaceae, shows that the morphologies are convergent rather than synapomorphic within Fabales.
    [Show full text]
  • Indigenous Plant Guide
    Local Indigenous Nurseries city of casey cardinia shire council city of casey cardinia shire council Bushwalk Native Nursery, Cranbourne South 9782 2986 Cardinia Environment Coalition Community Indigenous Nursery 5941 8446 Please contact Cardinia Shire Council on 1300 787 624 or the Chatfield and Curley, Narre Warren City of Casey on 9705 5200 for further information about indigenous (Appointment only) 0414 412 334 vegetation in these areas, or visit their websites at: Friends of Cranbourne Botanic Gardens www.cardinia.vic.gov.au (Grow to order) 9736 2309 Indigenous www.casey.vic.gov.au Kareelah Bush Nursery, Bittern 5983 0240 Kooweerup Trees and Shrubs 5997 1839 This publication is printed on Monza Recycled paper 115gsm with soy based inks. Maryknoll Indigenous Plant Nursery 5942 8427 Monza has a high 55% recycled fibre content, including 30% pre-consumer and Plant 25% post-consumer waste, 45% (fsc) certified pulp. Monza Recycled is sourced Southern Dandenongs Community Nursery, Belgrave 9754 6962 from sustainable plantation wood and is Elemental Chlorine Free (ecf). Upper Beaconsfield Indigenous Nursery 9707 2415 Guide Zoned Vegetation Maps City of Casey Cardinia Shire Council acknowledgements disclaimer Cardinia Shire Council and the City Although precautions have been of Casey acknowledge the invaluable taken to ensure the accuracy of the contributions of Warren Worboys, the information the publishers, authors Cardinia Environment Coalition, all and printers cannot accept responsi- of the community group members bility for any claim, loss, damage or from both councils, and Council liability arising out of the use of the staff from the City of Casey for their information published. technical knowledge and assistance in producing this guide.
    [Show full text]
  • Hardenbergia Violacea
    Threatened Species Link www.tas.gov.au SPECIES MANAGEMENT PROFILE Hardenbergia violacea purple coralpea Group: Magnoliophyta (flowering plants), Magnoliopsida (dicots), Fabales, Fabaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: endangered Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Not listed Endemic Found in Tasmania and elsewhere Status: Hardenbergia violacea is a scrambling perennial in the Fabaceae family. In Tasmania it is restricted to a few sandstone outcrops in the State’s southeast where it grows in dry eucalypt woodland. The total wild population in Tasmania consists of fewer than 100 mature plants, with a linear range of less than one kilometre. The species is at risk from grazing (stock, native animals, rabbits) and drought, with a high risk of extinction in the wild due to the population’s small size. Grazing, weed and fire management would benefit known occurrences. A complete species management profile is not currently available for this species. Check for further information on this page and any relevant Activity Advice.​ Key Points Important: Is this species in your area? Do you need a permit? Ensure you’ve covered all the issues by checking the Planning Ahead page. Important: Different threatened species may have different requirements. For any activity you are considering, read the Activity Advice pages for background information and important advice about managing around the needs of multiple threatened species. Surveying Key Survey reliability more info To ensure you follow the law - check whether your survey requires a permit. Always M Best time to survey report any new records to the Natural Values Atlas, or send the information direct to M Potential time to survey the Threatened Species Section.
    [Show full text]
  • Whitehorse Urban Biodiversity Strategy
    WHITEHORSE URBAN BIODIVERSITY STRATEGY For Council managed open space, streetscapes and community facilities Whitehorse Urban Biodiversity Strategy for Council Managed Open Space, Streetscapes and Community Facilities Contents Acknowledgements 4 9.1.11 Ground Level Habitat/Coarse Woody 24 Executive Summary 5 Material Fuel Reduction Guidelines Glossary Of Terms 6 9.1.12 Expand the Existing Infill Tree Planting 24 Program to Improve Canopy Cover 1 Introduction 6 9.1.13 Biodiversity Research Liaison 24 Committee 2 What Is Biodiversity 8 2.1 Defining “Whitehorse Biodiversity” 8 9.2 New Biodiversity Actions: One-Off 25 2.2 What are Public Whitehorse 8 Commitments Biodiversity Assets? 9.2.1 Development of An Inventory of 25 2.3 Water and Biodiversity 8 Whitehorse Biodiversity Assets 3 Statutory Context 13 10 9.2.2 List of “Biodiversity Hotspots” 25 3.1 Whitehorse City Council Policies 10 9.2.3 Development of A Biodiversity 26 and Strategies Corridors Plan 9.2.4 Identify Potential “No Mow” Areas 26 4 The Whitehorse Landscape and Biodiversity 10 9.2.5 Vegetation Management Plans For 26 4.1 Aboriginal History of Whitehorse 10 Large Tracts Of Land With 4.2 Natural Landscape of Whitehorse 10 Alternative Uses 4.3 The Remaining Natural Landscape 12 9.2.6 Biodiversity Engagement – Logos 26 of Whitehorse and Signage 4.4 The Suburban Whitehorse 14 9.2.7 Development Of Monitoring 27 Landscape Program 4.5 What Biodiversity is Missing 14 9.2.8 Community Reporting and Data 27 From Whitehorse Gathering 4.6 What Whitehorse Biodiversity Remains 15 9.2.9 Environmental
    [Show full text]
  • Hardenbergia Violaceaviolacea (Purple Coralpea)
    HardenbergiaListing Statement for Hardenbergia violaceaviolacea (purple coralpea) purple coralpea T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D F L O R A L I S T I N G S T A T E M E N T Image by Eve Lazarus Scientific name: Hardenbergia violacea (Schneev.) Stearn, J. Bot. 78: 70 (1940) Common name: purple coralpea (Wapstra et al. 2005) Group: vascular plant, dicotyledon, family Fabaceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 : endangered Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 : Not listed Distribution: Tasmanian NRM Regions: South Endemic status: Not endemic to Tasmania Figure 1. Distribution of Hardenbergia violacea in Plate 1. Hardenbergia violacea: foliage & flowers Tasmania, showing NRM regions (images by Rob Wiltshire & Eve Lazarus) 1 Threatened Species Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water & Environment Listing Statement for Hardenbergia violacea (purple coralpea) SUMMARY: Hardenbergia violacea is a pea-like, about 8 mm long, violet to royal scrambling perennial in the Fabaceae family. In purple (rarely pink or white), with a yellow flare Tasmania it is restricted to a few sandstone at the base of the standard (the largest petal). outcrops in the State’s southeast where it grows The fruit is a flattened oblong-shaped pod, 20 in dry eucalypt woodland. The total wild to 50 mm long by 8 mm broad, with 6 to 8 population in Tasmania consists of fewer than seeds separated by pithy partitions. 100 mature plants, with a linear range of less [Description from Curtis & Morris 1975, Lynch than one kilometre.
    [Show full text]
  • County of Riverside Friendly Plant List
    ATTACHMENT A COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE CALIFORNIA FRIENDLY PLANT LIST PLANT LIST KEY WUCOLS III (Water Use Classification of Landscape Species) WUCOLS Region Sunset Zones 1 2,3,14,15,16,17 2 8,9 3 22,23,24 4 18,19,20,21 511 613 WUCOLS III Water Usage/ Average Plant Factor Key H-High (0.8) M-Medium (0.5) L-Low (.2) VL-Very Low (0.1) * Water use for this plant material was not listed in WUCOLS III, but assumed in comparison to plants of similar species ** Zones for this plant material were not listed in Sunset, but assumed in comparison to plants of similar species *** Zones based on USDA zones ‡ The California Friendly Plant List is provided to serve as a general guide for plant material. Riverside County has multiple Sunset Zones as well as microclimates within those zones which can affect plant viability and mature size. As such, plants and use categories listed herein are not exhaustive, nor do they constitute automatic approval; all proposed plant material is subject to review by the County. In some cases where a broad genus or species is called out within the list, there may be multiple species or cultivars that may (or may not) be appropriate. The specific water needs and sizes of cultivars should be verified by the designer. Site specific conditions should be taken into consideration in determining appropriate plant material. This includes, but is not limited to, verifying soil conditions affecting erosion, site specific and Fire Department requirements or restrictions affecting plans for fuel modifications zones, and site specific conditions near MSHCP areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Phenology of the Threatened Diuris Praecox (Orchidaceae), a Range-Restricted Terrestrial Orchid from Central Eastern New South Wales
    Cunninghamia Date of Publication: May 2020 A journal of plant ecology for eastern Australia ISSN 0727- 9620 (print) • ISSN 2200 - 405X (Online) Phenology of the threatened Diuris praecox (Orchidaceae), a range-restricted terrestrial orchid from central eastern New South Wales Bonni Yare1, Stephen Bell1,3 and Nigel Hunter2 1 School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle, University Drive, Callaghan, NSW 2308, AUSTRALIA. 2 NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Planning, Industry and Environment, PO Box 488G, Newcastle, NSW 2300, AUSTRALIA. 3 Corresponding author [email protected] Abstract: Phenological studies are important to gain insights into the ecology of plant species, particularly those that are threatened and require specific management actions such as regular population monitoring. For many species of terrestrial orchids, limited fundamental knowledge on peak flowering, pollination and seed production restricts effective monitoring outcomes. In this single-season study, phenology data from one population of the vulnerable Diuris praecox were collected, with the aim of informing future management relating to monitoring surveys and to assist in conservation of this species. To this end, six sub-populations (three each in forest habitat and along maintained powerline easements) were visited weekly from the onset of flowering until seed release, with observations made on 134 tagged individuals within 10 x 10 m plots. During the 2019 flowering season, 37% of all plants developed capsules, and 35% released seed. However, success varied between locations, with greater floral displays along powerline easements resulting in stronger pollination rates, while sparse sub-populations in forested locations showed lower pollination. Significantly more flowers per inflorescence (range 1-7) were evident in forest than easement sites, but there was no significant difference in inflorescence height across these habitats.
    [Show full text]
  • Plant List Covers Trial
    LowLowLow WaterWaterWater UseUseUse DroughtDroughtDrought TolerantTolerantTolerant PlantPlantPlant ListListList OfficialOfficial RegulatoryRegulatory ListList forfor thethe ArizonaArizona DepartmentDepartment ofof WaterWater Resources,Resources, PinalPinal ActiveActive ManagementManagement AreaArea 17291729 N.N. TrekellTrekell Rd.Rd. SuiteSuite 105105 (520)(520) 836-4857836-4857 CasaCasa Grande,Grande, AZAZ 8522285222 www.azwater.govwww.azwater.gov Photo - Christina Bickelmann 2004 LOW WATER USE/DROUGHT TOLERANT PLANT LIST PINAL ACTIVE MANAGEMENT AREA ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES The Low Water Use/Drought Tolerant Plant List (List) is used by the Department of Water Resources as a regulatory document in both the Municipal and Industrial Conservation Programs of the Third Management Plan. The List was compiled by the Department of Water Resources in cooperation with the Landscape Technical committee of the Arizona Municipal Water Users Association, comprised of experts from the Desert Botanical Garden, the Arizona Department of Transportation and various municipal, nursery and landscape specialists. Individuals wishing to add or delete plants from the list may submit information to the Director of the Arizona Department of Water Resources (Director) for consideration. The Director will amend the list as appropriate. The List does not imply that every plant listed is suited to every right-of-way or low water use landscape situation. It is the responsibility of the landscape designer, architect or contractor to determine which plants are suitable for a specific location and situation. The bibliography provides substantial educational information to determine specific plant characteristics and needs. PLANTS ARE PLACED IN THE CATEGORIES WHERE THEY ARE MOST OFTEN USED. THIS DOES NOT PRECLUDE THE USE OF ANY PLANT IN ANOTHER GROWTH FORM.
    [Show full text]