DOCSLIB.ORG

Elizabeth Carter's Translation of Algarotti

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Elizabeth Carter's Translation of Algarotti chapter 5 Science for Ladies? Elizabeth Carter’s Translation of Algarotti and “popular” Newtonianism in the Eighteenth Century Sarah Hutton An important aspect of the reception of Newtonianism was its dissemination to non-specialist audiences of various kinds. If popularity is measured in terms of translations and reprints, one of the most popular epitomes of Newtonian science to be published in the eighteenth century was Francesco Algarotti’s Newtonianismo per le dame [Newtonianism for the ladies] (1737), which saw some thirty editions and was translated into several European languages, in- cluding Swedish, English and, apparently, Portuguese.1 Furthermore, unlike most popularisations of Newtonianism, Algarotti’s book intersects several as- pects of the European Newton reception – Italy, France and England. In this paper I shall examine what Algarotti’s text reveals about the non-specialist reception of Newton in the eighteenth-century by focusing on the English translation by Elizabeth Carter (1717–1806), which was published as Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy Explain’d for the Use of the Ladies in 1739.2 I shall set her translation in the context of the wider diffusion of Newtonianism in eighteenth century England, and discuss the circumstances of her involvement in order to discover whether we can learn anything about women’s knowledge of science in the period. 1 Peter and Ruth Wallis, Newton and Newtoniana, 1672–1975. A Bibliography (London: Unwin, 1977), 134–136. 2 Sir Isaac Newton’s Philosophy Explain’d for the Use of the Ladies. In Six dialogues on Light and Colours (London: Edward Cave, 1739). Carter’s translation is available on the Newton Project website: http://www.newtonproject.sussex.ac.uk. For Carter’s other writings, see Judith Haw- ley (ed.), Bluestocking Feminism: Writings of the Bluestocking circle, 1738–1785, vol. 4, Elizabeth Carter (London: Pickering & Chatto, 1999). On Carter, see Sarah Hutton, “Virtue, God and Stoicism in the Thought of Elizabeth Carter and Catharine Macaulay” in Jacqueline Broad and Karen Green (eds), Virtue, Liberty and Toleration (Dordrecht: Springer, 2007), 137–148. © koninklijke brill nv, leiden, ���7 | doi �0.��63/9789004336650_006 <UN> Science for Ladies? 103 Popular Newtonianism Of Newton’s own writings, his Opticks was the most accessible to non special- ists.3 By contrast, Newton’s Principia mathematica was a forbiddingly technical text, even for contemporary mathematicians and natural philosophers.4 This gave scope for expositions to those not sufficiently mathematically literate to tackle it. As Larry Stewart has pointed out, there was a veritable natural- philosophy industry in popular expositions of Newtonianism.5 There is considerable variety among the non-specialist media that make up this wider diffusion of Newtonianism which constitutes “popular Newtonianism”. The means of dissemination included both summaries and recensions of New- tonian physics, journals, public lectures, and even sermons and a children’s primer. Many of them can be described as “Newton-without-numbers”, and the audiences for Newton-made-easy included gentlemen, students, bourgeois citizens, and even women and children. The celebration of Newton in verse contributed to the creation of a wider, receptive public for Newtonian natural philosophy. Arguably the most important text for disseminating Newtonianism to a wid- er audience was Newton’s Opticks, which was by far the most widely known of his works in the eighteenth century, and of key importance for explaining experimental method.6 Opticks, was reprinted six times in English between 1704 and 1721, and twice in Latin translation (Optice: sive de reflexionibus, re- fractionibus, inflexionibus & coloribus lucis, libri tres) (1706 and 1719), which included six additional queries (17–23). Prior to Algarotti’s Newtonianismo, one of the only expositions published in England was Desaguliers’ System of Experimental Philosophy, printed at London in 1719, and reissued with addi- tions as Lectures of Experimental Philosophy in the same year. Another treatise on optics published just prior to Carter’s translation of Algarotti was Robert Smith’s, A Compleat System of Opticks in four books (Cambridge and London, 1738). Practical knowledge of optics could also be found in Benjamin Martin’s The Philosophical Grammar, being a view of the present state of Experimented 3 Sir Isaac Newton, Opticks: or, a treatise of the reflexions, refractions, inflexions and colours of light. Also two treatises of the species and magnitude of curvilinear figures (London: Sam Smith and Benjamin Walford, 1704). 4 Sir Isaac Newton, Philosophiæ naturalis principia mathematica (London: Joseph Streater and Sam Smith, 1687). 5 Larry Stewart, The Rise of Public Science. Rhetoric, Technology and Natural Philosophy in New- tonian Britain, 1660–1750 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992), 119. 6 A.R. Hall, All was Light. An Introduction to Newton’s “Opticks” (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1993). <UN>.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Rhetorical Analysis of Sir Isaac Newton's Principia A
    A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF SIR ISAAC NEWTON’S PRINCIPIA A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF MASTER OF ARTS IN THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE TEXAS WOMAN’S UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH, SPEECH, AND FOREIGN LANGUAGES COLLEGE OF ARTS AND SCIENCES BY GIRIBALA JOSHI, B.S., M.S. DENTON, TEXAS AUGUST 2018 Copyright © 2018 by Giribala Joshi DEDICATION Nature and Nature’s Laws lay hid in Night: God said, “Let Newton be!” and all was light. ~ Alexander Pope Dedicated to all the wonderful eighteenth-century Enlightenment thinkers and philosophers! ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to acknowledge the continuous support and encouragement that I received from the Department of English, Speech and Foreign Languages. I especially want to thank my thesis committee member Dr. Ashley Bender, and my committee chair Dr. Brian Fehler, for their guidance and feedback while writing this thesis. iii ABSTRACT GIRIBALA JOSHI A RHETORICAL ANALYSIS OF SIR ISAAC NEWTON’S PRINCIPIA AUGUST 2018 In this thesis, I analyze Isaac Newton's Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica in the framework of Aristotle’s theories of rhetoric. Despite the long-held view that science only deals with brute facts and does not require rhetoric, we learn that science has its own special topics. This study highlights the rhetorical situation of the Principia and Newton’s rhetorical strategies, emphasizing the belief that scientific facts and theories are also rhetorical constructions. This analysis shows that the credibility of the author and the text, the emotional debates before and after the publication of the text, the construction of logical arguments, and the presentation style makes the book the epitome of scientific writing.
    [Show full text]
  • Newton.Indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag
    omslag Newton.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 14:45 | Pag. 1 e Dutch Republic proved ‘A new light on several to be extremely receptive to major gures involved in the groundbreaking ideas of Newton Isaac Newton (–). the reception of Newton’s Dutch scholars such as Willem work.’ and the Netherlands Jacob ’s Gravesande and Petrus Prof. Bert Theunissen, Newton the Netherlands and van Musschenbroek played a Utrecht University crucial role in the adaption and How Isaac Newton was Fashioned dissemination of Newton’s work, ‘is book provides an in the Dutch Republic not only in the Netherlands important contribution to but also in the rest of Europe. EDITED BY ERIC JORINK In the course of the eighteenth the study of the European AND AD MAAS century, Newton’s ideas (in Enlightenment with new dierent guises and interpre- insights in the circulation tations) became a veritable hype in Dutch society. In Newton of knowledge.’ and the Netherlands Newton’s Prof. Frans van Lunteren, sudden success is analyzed in Leiden University great depth and put into a new perspective. Ad Maas is curator at the Museum Boerhaave, Leiden, the Netherlands. Eric Jorink is researcher at the Huygens Institute for Netherlands History (Royal Dutch Academy of Arts and Sciences). / www.lup.nl LUP Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 1 Newton and the Netherlands Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag. 2 Newton and the Netherlands.indd | Sander Pinkse Boekproductie | 16-11-12 / 16:47 | Pag.
    [Show full text]
  • Newton: 'Opticks'
    University of Dayton eCommons Imprints and Impressions: Milestones in Human Commentaries on the Exhibit’s Works Progress November 2014 Newton: ‘Opticks’ Follow this and additional works at: http://ecommons.udayton.edu/rosebk_commentary Recommended Citation "Newton: ‘Opticks’" (2014). Commentaries on the Exhibit’s Works. 30. http://ecommons.udayton.edu/rosebk_commentary/30 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Imprints and Impressions: Milestones in Human Progress at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Commentaries on the Exhibit’s Works by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Reflections on the various works in the exhibit Imprints and Impressions: Milestones in Human Progress Highlights from the Rose Rare Book Collection, Sept. 29-Nov. 9, 2014 Roesch Library, University of Dayton Isaac Newton Opticks: Or, a Treatise of the Reflexions, Refractions, Inflexions and Colours of Light London, 1704 First edition Reflection 1 Perhaps the key point of Newton’s observations was that white light is made up ow is a rainbow formed? Why of a superposition of many different “rays” do I see colors like magenta, of light with different colors. Furthermore, H yellow, and turquoise blue on an each individual color of light, in a oily puddle or when my kids blow soap continuous spectrum, has its own property bubbles? Why does a prism project the of “refrangibility,” or refraction. When a ray colors of the rainbow on the wall? And why of red light (such as a laser pointer) hits a are all the really big telescopes based on glass surface at an angle, it will be bent as it mirrors and not lenses, which was the passes into the new medium.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-01316-2 - The Cambridge Companion to Women’s Writing in Britain, 1660–1789 Edited by Catherine Ingrassia Frontmatter More information the cambridge companion to women’s writing in britain, 1660–1789 Women writers played a central role in the literature and culture of eighteenth- century Britain. Featuring essays on female writers and genres by leading scho- lars in the field, this Companion introduces readers to the range, significance, and complexity of women’s writing across multiple genres in Britain between 1660 and 1789. Divided into two parts, the Companion first discusses women’s participation in print culture, featuring essays on topics such as women and popular culture, women as professional writers, women as readers and writers, and place and publication. Additionally, Part I explores the ways that women writers crossed generic boundaries. The second part contains chapters on many of the key genres in which women wrote, including poetry, drama, fiction (early and later), history, the ballad, periodicals, and travel writing. The Companion also provides an introduction surveying the state of the field, an integrated chronology, and a guide to further reading. catherine ingrassia is Professor of English at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond, Virginia. She is the author of Authorship, Commerce, and Gender in Eighteenth-Century England: A Culture of Paper Credit (Cambridge, 1998); editor of a critical edition of Eliza Haywood’s Anti- Pamela and Henry Fielding’s Shamela (2004); and co-editor of A Companion to the Eighteenth-Century Novel and Culture (2005) and the anthology British Women Poets of the Long Eighteenth Century (2009).
    [Show full text]
  • Newton's Mathematical Physics
    Isaac Newton A new era in science Waseda University, SILS, Introduction to History and Philosophy of Science LE201, History and Philosophy of Science Newton . Newton’s Legacy Newton brought to a close the astronomical revolution begun by Copernicus. He combined the dynamic research of Galileo with the astronomical work of Kepler. He produced an entirely new cosmology and a new way of thinking about the world, based on the interaction between matter and mathematically determinate forces. He joined the mathematical and experimental methods: the hypothetico-deductive method. His work became the model for rational mechanics as it was later practiced by mathematicians, particularly during the Enlightenment. LE201, History and Philosophy of Science Newton . William Blake’s Newton (1795) LE201, History and Philosophy of Science Newton LE201, History and Philosophy of Science Newton . Newton’s De Motu coporum in gyrum Edmond Halley (of the comet) visited Cambridge in 1684 and 1 talked with Newton about inverse-square forces (F 9 d2 ). Newton stated that he has already shown that inverse-square force implied an ellipse, but could not find the documents. Later he rewrote this into a short document called De Motu coporum in gyrum, and sent it to Halley. Halley was excited and asked for a full treatment of the subject. Two years later Newton sent Book I of The Mathematical Principals of Natural Philosophy (Principia). Key Point The goal of this project was to derive the orbits of bodies from a simpler set of assumptions about motion. That is, it sought to explain Kepler’s Laws with a simpler set of laws.
    [Show full text]
  • The Life of the Female Mind: Hester Mulso Chapone and the Gendered Rhetoric of Experience
    The Life of the Female Mind: Hester Mulso Chapone and the Gendered Rhetoric of Experience Bethany Mannon Abstract: This article studies the writings of Hester Mulso Chapone (1727-1801) a prolific member of the late-eighteenth century Bluestocking circle. Working within genres traditionally available to women, most notably the conversational rhetoric of letters, Chapone advocates for an expanded social role and rhetorical education for young women. These letters later circulated publicly as Letters on Filial Obedience (1751) and Letters on the Improvement of the Mind (1773). Chapone’s participation in a tradition of feminist writing deserves attention be- cause of her success foregrounding personal experience as a source of authority and deploying personal writing to persuade, inform, and confront prevailing power structures. Keywords: Conversational Rhetoric, Feminist Rhetoric, Life Writing, Bluestockings Hester Mulso Chapone (1727-1801) wrote prolifically in the eighteenth century and, together with the writers Elizabeth Montagu, Catharine Macaulay, Charlotte Lennox, Elizabeth Carter, Sarah Scott, Hannah More, and Frances Burney, influenced British intellectual culture. A member of this Bluestocking generation, Chapone was known during her life for her essays, letters, conver- sation, poetry, and advice on the education of young women. She maintained a reputation as an intellectual moralist into the nineteenth century, as her writings continued to be widely printed and read. Chapone worked within the genres of letters and conduct books—traditionally accessible to women—but expanded those genres to confront eighteenth-century notions of virtue and education. Her Letters on Filial Obedience (1751) and Letters on the Improvement of the Mind (1773) foreground her youth and femininity; she performs a Peitho Journal: Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Reposs #19: Newtonianism in the Scandinavian Countries, 1690–1790
    RePoSS: Research Publications on Science Studies RePoSS #19: Newtonianism in the Scandinavian Countries, 1690–1790 Helge Kragh August 2012 Centre for Science Studies, University of Aarhus, Denmark Research group: History and philosophy of science Please cite this work as: Helge Kragh (Aug. 2012). Newtonianism in the Scandinavian Countries, 1690–1790. RePoSS: Research Publications on Sci- ence Studies 19. Aarhus: Centre for Science Studies, University of Aarhus. url: http://www.css.au.dk/reposs. Copyright c Helge Kragh, 2012 1 Newtonianism in the Scandinavian Countries, 1690-1790 HELGE KRAGH 1 Introduction In the present context, the Scandinavian countries refer to two national or administrative units, the one being Denmark and the other Sweden. In the period here considered, largely the century from 1690 to 1790, ‘Denmark’ means really Denmark-Norway, for until 1814 Norway was part of the double monarchy ruled by the king and his government in Copenhagen. It should also be kept in mind that parts of what is today Germany, namely Schleswig-Holstein, belonged to the kingdom. However, as far as language and culture were concerned, these parts of southern Denmark were more German than Danish, and they played no important role in the scientific life of the kingdom. Sweden covered a much larger geographical area than it does today. The country had expanded greatly during the seventeenth century, when not only Finland but also parts of the Baltic area and northern Germany came under Swedish rule. About 1720, after the Great Northern War, Sweden lost most of its possessions, but the major part of Finland remained as part of the country until Centre for Science Studies, Department of Physics and Astronomy, Aarhus University, Denmark.
    [Show full text]
  • Newtonianism and the Physics of Du Châtelet's Institutions De Physique
    To appear in: Collected Wisdom of the Early Modern Scholar: Essays in Honor of Mordechai Feingold, eds. Anna Marie Roos and Gideon Manning. Newtonianism and the physics of Du Châtelet’s Institutions de physique Marius Stan This paper is about two things that cross paths. One is the many senses of the category ‘Newtonian,’ and their uses for exegesis. The other is the phys- ics that Emilie du Châtelet grounded philosophically around 1740 in her book, Institutions de physique. I offer it as a tribute to Moti Feingold’s mag- isterial work on how the century after Newton responded to his science. I begin with some context. Many have described Institutions as a work of Leibnizian foundations for Newtonian science. An inspiring image, no doubt, but is it accurate? I argue here that it is not: little physics in her book is really Newtonian. Most of her physics is from figures before Newton; and even when she includes his results, du Châtelet filters them through demonstrably un-Newtonian ideas. So, we must abandon the conventional wisdom about her science.1 1 In the 20th century, the dominant view became that Institutions is concerned with “merg- ing Leibnizianism and Newtonianism”; is a “marriage between Leibnizian metaphysics and Newtonian science”; is an “introduction to Newtonian physics” attesting du Châtelet’s conversion to “Leibnizian metaphysics”; mediates “between Leibniz and Newton”; is a landmark document in the “history of French Newtonianism” and yet “framed according to Leibnizian principles.” Allegedly it is a “fusion of Newton, Descartes, and Leibniz,” and it synthesizes “Newtonian physics” and “Leibnizian metaphysics.” So pervasive is it that it has seeped into the broader consciousness of Anglophone academia.
    [Show full text]
  • Science and Belief from the Copernicans to the Creationists and the Way Ahead
    Science and belief from the Copernicans to the Creationists and the way ahead Course Number: HIST/INDS 550 Institution: Regent College Instructors: Dr. David Livingstone and Dr. Mark Noll Course Description This course examines critical historical episodes in the interaction between Christianity and science from the sixteenth century to the present. A major goal is to show how deeply embedded in specific cultural situations are all “encounters” between Christianity and science. A second goal is to subvert the notion that talking about “creation” and “evolution” was or ever can be a simple matter. A third goal is to suggest Christian strategies for a more fruitful interchange between science and faith. From this course, students should take away both enriched historical understanding and better theological balance for approaching critical questions relating science and Christianity. Class Outline Mon, July 17: I. Introduction II. Telling the Story of Science and Christianity Tues, July 18: III. The Copernican "Revolution" IV. The Reformation and Science Wed, July 19: V. The Puritans and Science VI. Newton and the Mechanistic World Picture Thurs, July 20: VII. Enlightenment and the Human Sciences VIII. Enlightenment, Science, and Christianity in North America Fri, July 21: IX. Pre-Darwinian, Early-Victorian Science X. The 1830s as a crucial decade for science, theology, and society Mon, July 24: XI. Darwin the man XII. Evolutionary Theories in the Late 19th Century Tues, July 25: XIII. Christian Scientists Encounter Evolution XIV. Theological Evaluations of Darwin and Darwinism Wed, July 26: XV. Creationism in the Context of American Religious History XVI. Interpreting the New Creationism Thurs, July 27: XVII.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes Steven Shapin Isis, Vol. 72, No. 2. (Jun., 1981), Pp
    Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes Steven Shapin Isis, Vol. 72, No. 2. (Jun., 1981), pp. 187-215. Stable URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0021-1753%28198106%2972%3A2%3C187%3AOGAKNP%3E2.0.CO%3B2-C Isis is currently published by The University of Chicago Press. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/about/terms.html. JSTOR's Terms and Conditions of Use provides, in part, that unless you have obtained prior permission, you may not download an entire issue of a journal or multiple copies of articles, and you may use content in the JSTOR archive only for your personal, non-commercial use. Please contact the publisher regarding any further use of this work. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/journals/ucpress.html. Each copy of any part of a JSTOR transmission must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. The JSTOR Archive is a trusted digital repository providing for long-term preservation and access to leading academic journals and scholarly literature from around the world. The Archive is supported by libraries, scholarly societies, publishers, and foundations. It is an initiative of JSTOR, a not-for-profit organization with a mission to help the scholarly community take advantage of advances in technology. For more information regarding JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. http://www.jstor.org Mon Aug 20 10:29:37 2007 Of Gods and Kings: Natural Philosophy and Politics in the Leibniz-Clarke Disputes By Steven Shapin* FTER TWO AND A HALF CENTURIES the Newton-Leibniz disputes A continue to inflame the passions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Self-Fashioning of French Newtonianism J
    Metascience DOI 10.1007/s11016-010-9511-3 BOOK REVIEW The self-fashioning of French Newtonianism J. B. Shank: The Newton Wars and the beginning of the French Enlightenment. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press, 2008, xv+571pp, $55.00 HB Charles T. Wolfe • David Gilad Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010 J. B. Shank has written a major cultural history of Newtonianism in the French Enlightenment—or rather a study of how Newtonianism was constructed to serve the purposes of the ‘‘self-fashioning’’ of various key figures in the French Enlightenment. As straight history of ideas, it can be read as providing a French counterpart to works such as John Gascoigne’s masterful (1989) study of science and religion at Cambridge, or as a more detailed, more culturally and rhetorically sophisticated book-length extension of analyses such as Robert Schofield’s ‘‘taxonomy of eighteenth-century Newtonianisms’’ (Schofield 1978). But Shank is also interested in a different approach, a different form of analysis, which in fact challenges ‘‘the classic narrative produced by the Enlightenment philosophes’’ (21). He uses lots of language that harks back to the heyday of theory in the humanities— the book is ‘‘a critical genealogy of beginnings,’’ a ‘‘postmodern,’’ ‘‘post- Enlightenment’’ history of an event—but in fact very little of this really has an impact on the detailed analyses produced over the next four hundred and fifty pages. Brunet’s (1931) book on the introduction of Newton’s theories into France in the early eighteenth century,
    [Show full text]
  • Translation, Reputation, and Authorship in Eighteenth-Century Britain
    Translation, Reputation, and Authorship in Eighteenth-Century Britain by Catherine Fleming A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of English University of Toronto © Copyright by Catherine Fleming 2018 Translation, Reputation, and Authorship in Eighteenth-Century Britain Catherine Fleming Doctor of Philosophy Department of English University of Toronto 2018 Abstract This thesis explores the reputation-building strategies which shaped eighteenth-century translation practices by examining authors of both translations and original works whose lives and writing span the long eighteenth century. Recent studies in translation have often focused on the way in which adaptation shapes the reception of a foreign work, questioning the assumptions and cultural influences which become visible in the process of transformation. My research adds a new dimension to the emerging scholarship on translation by examining how foreign texts empower their English translators, offering opportunities for authors to establish themselves within a literary community. Translation, adaptation, and revision allow writers to set up advantageous comparisons to other authors, times, and literary milieux and to create a product which benefits from the cachet of foreignness and the authority implied by a pre-existing audience, successful reception history, and the standing of the original author. I argue that John Dryden, Alexander Pope, Eliza Haywood, and Elizabeth Carter integrate this legitimizing process into their conscious attempts at self-fashioning as they work with existing texts to demonstrate creative and compositional skills, establish kinship to canonical authors, and both ii construct and insert themselves within a literary canon, exercising a unique form of control over their contemporary reputation.
    [Show full text]