DOCSLIB.ORG

Urban Planning and Economic Development News Magazine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Urban Planning and Economic Development News Magazine URBAN PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT January 2012 January NEWS MAGAZINE A Solar Panel is a Solar Panel, Right? Alternative Energy for Economic Development Tourism Planning Tools for Sustainable Economic Development Bad Planning Vs Urban Economic Development A Global Publication VOL 1 A Global Publication In Association with Urban Planning and Economic Development Associates Our Vision is to share a full range of interdisciplinary professional knowledge with community leaders, professional planners, businesses and interested citizens having a commitment to operational excellence in the public and private sectors. Contributions from our constituency will assist in facilitating sound decisions in community and economic development to promote continued commitments in creating quality places to live, work and play. Our goal is to provide educational information and services in urban planning and environmental conservation to an interconnected global community that will both enable in- dividuals and communities to adapt to new holistic techniques and solutions to resolve existing and future urban and environmental issues and foster economic and sustainable development. General Manager/Publisher Pamela Shinn, B.S. URP Editor in Chief David Weinstock, Ph.D Assistant Online Manager Sam Lovall AssistantWeb Design Editor Ronald Hanson, M.A. FS Design Consultant Chantel Martin Cover Photo, “Morning Sunrise at North Hoyle”; North Hoyle offshore wind farm, Liverpool Bay, Irish Sea Courtsey of Arron Crowe, Denbighshire, UK. For more information about Arron Crowe and his work you can contact him at: acrowephotography@gmail. © January 2012 2 “Partnering for a Brighter Tomorrow” FEATURE ARTICLES: Alternative Energy Solutions A Solar Panel is a Solar Panel, Right? A closer look at solar power options for your home, business or public facility. By Clayton T Grow, PE, LEED AP 4 Alternative Energy for Economic Development Implementation of Biomass, Hydro and Solar Power By Alison Bates 39 Transportation Bad Planning Vs Urban Economic Development Why did Cicloparqueaderos bike storage feature not alleviate urban exclusión in Bogota? By Solenne Cucchi 8 Shinn Pamela by Photo Economy Tourism Planning Tools for Sustainable Economic Redevelopment Development By Tracy Mullins, MS, AICP 15 Brownfield Redevelopment in Michigan The forgotten element of community planning Urban Scape By Flo McCormack 32 Is the International Architectual Style Sapping Restorative Development Regulations Urban Soul? By Kaizer Rangwala, AICP, CEcD, CNU-A 36 By Annette Fehr-Stomp 20 Law Credits Photo Credits 47 Redevelopment and Blight in Flux San Diego Superior Court Affirms High Legal Threshold for Municipalities to Declare an Area “Blighted” for Purposes of Redevelopment By Anthony Nash 23 Agriculture Urban Agriculture A growing trend By Beth Hagenbuch, ALSA 26 Photo by Niko Paul Bovenberg Paul Niko by Photo 3 A Solar Panel is a Solar Panel, Right? A closer look at solar power options for your home, business or public facility. By Clayton T Grow, PE, LEED AP Growing Sustainably: Your guide to green building This column, written by an engineer with experi- ence designing sustainable building practices in new construction and renovation projects, will keep you up-to-date on useful strategies to help your building or construction project use energy Image via SunVest Solar Inc. more efficiently, generate less waste, and reduce its impact on the environment. Urban planners, municipality officials, building owners and oper- Thin-film PV panels are considered the “second ators, engineers, and architects will benefit from generation” of solar panel design. The general princi- the sage advice and easily understood explana- pal of converting the sun’s rays to DC electricity and tions of the often confusing, but essential, world then inverting it to AC is the same as standard PV of sustainable construction products and prac- panels, but the materials used to make the panels are tices. drastically different. Manufacturers of thin-film PV’s use nanotechnology to reduce material costs, fabri- A Common Misconception cating these futuristic panels from non-silicon mate- rials, including copper, indium, gallium, and seleni- A design team looking to use green building practices um. The flexibility of the film used to make these in new or renovated buildings will, at some point, innovative panels allows them to be configured in al- consider using solar panels. The idea of solar panels most any size or shape to best meet the needs of a that many people have is one of billboard-like assem- project. blies with sturdy vertical supports that require a sig- nificant amount of rooftop or open area to convert the sun’s rays to electricity. The truth is, there are several different types of solar panels, and one of the most popular types does not convert sunlight to electricity at all. This article will explain the differences, advantages, disadvantages, typical applications, and supplemental information sources of three main categories of solar panels: stand- ard photovoltaic (PV); thin-film PV; and solar ther- mal collectors. Three Categories of Panels Standard PV panels are the prototypical solar pan- el that most people have in mind when they envision solar panels. These panels are often mounted on roof- tops or in open areas, where they convert energy from Thin-film PV panels on a residential roof the sun to DC electricity (#1). This DC current flows in New South Wales, Australia. Image via to the inverter (#2), where it is inverted to AC elec- SolarShop on Flickr. tricity, to be used on-site (#3), with the excess getting sent and sold back to the grid (#4). 4 A Solar Panel is a Solar Panel, Right? A closer look at solar power options for your home, business or public facility. By Clayton T Grow, PE, LEED AP Solar thermal collectors may look similar to stand- Standard PV Panel ard PV panels, but are quite different. The most com- Examples mon form of solar thermal collectors are flat plate col- lectors, which are panels that consist of a transparent cover, a dark-colored flat solar energy absorber, and Standard PV panels are ideal for installation on pro- heat-transport tubing. Instead of converting the sun’s jects that have plenty of would-be wasted space. light directly to electricity, these devices are config- Buildings with extensive roof areas and projects with ured with a series of fluid-filled pipes inside the panel. large open areas are a good fit for a standard PV solar A pumping system circulates this fluid - water or a wa- array. While warehouses, factories, and campuses ter/anti-freeze mix - that is circulated from inside the with large open fields can best benefit from a PV -ar building, through the panel tubing out in, where the ray by generating large percentages of their electricity fluid then transfers the heat it absorbed from the sun use, smaller commercial and residential applications to a hot water storage tank. The tubing in the solar can also achieve significant electricity savings when collectors is very well insulated on the non-sunlight properly configured. side in order to minimize heat dissipation to the out- door environment. Thin-film PV Examples Many properties do not have sufficient area in which to install large supports for a standard PV array, so thin-film PV may be more appropriate. Recent in- creases in efficiency and cost reduction are making thin-film technology viable for more applications. The advantage of installing a thin-film array is that they can be installed with a very low profile, some- times even using a peel-and-stick application. If building owners are concerned with maintaining a sleek aesthetic for their building or if large support structures are infeasible, a thin-film PV system may be most appropriate. Solar Thermal Collector Examples Because solar thermal collectors and PV panels Schematic of solar themal collector and storage tank serve very different functions, a building owner configuration. Image via Inkwibbna on Wikimedia could conceivably install both types to help de- Commons. fray the costs of both electricity and heating. So- lar thermal panels are most cost-effective when used for buildings that have a high hot water de- Less common variations of solar thermal collectors mand, such as restaurants, hotels, laundromats, include: evacuated tube collectors, parabolic troughs car washes, or buildings with hydronic heating and dishes, and solar power towers. These are more systems. While they can be used for essentially complex and experimental technologies and are not any building that uses hot water, the payback pe- commonly implemented, except by large utilities or riod is shorter for buildings with high hot water research organizations. demand. 5 A Solar Panel is a Solar Panel, Right? A closer look at solar power options for your home, business or public facility. By Clayton T Grow, PE, LEED AP Solar LEED Credits If you’re considering LEED® (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certification, solar PV panels and solar thermal panels can help achieve the following credits in the United States Green Building Council’s (USGBC®) LEED Green Building Rating Sodons Energy Solutions by Photo System, version 2009 for New Construction and Ma- jor Renovations (NC+MR): Energy Savings 1. Sustainable Sites Credit 7.1: Heat Island Effect – Nonroof (1 point) The amount of energy you will save each year 2. Energy and Atmosphere (EA) Prerequisite 2: with a solar power system depends on the size of Minimum Energy Performance (required) your building, the size of the system, the climate, the price of electricity, and a slew of other fac- 3. EA Credit 1: tors. For an appropriately sized system, if a Optimize Energy Performance (1-19 points) building owner receives all of the federal, state, and local tax credits and rebates available to de- 4. EA Credit 2: fray a portion of the system installation costs, a On-site Renewable Energy (1-7 points) home or small business PV system can have a payback period as short as 4-5 years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Are DOE Loan Guarantees an Energy Policy Mistake?
    Greentech Media http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/print/Are-DOE-Loan-Guarantee... RESEARCH & ANALYSIS | POLICY ERIC WESOFF: JUNE 2, 2011 Are DOE Loan Guarantees an Energy Policy Mistake? It’s the Liberals versus the Libertarians: Is the DOE Loan Guarantee Program a righteous creator of jobs and new industry or a wrongful use of taxpayer money? The United States DOE Loan Guarantee Program has disbursed $30.7 billion and claims to have created or saved 62,350 jobs. The loan program has three categories: Section 1703 of Title XVII of the Energy Policy Act of 2005 authorizes the DOE to support innovative clean energy technologies that are typically unable to obtain conventional private financing due to high technology risks. Section 1705 is a temporary program designed to address the current economic conditions of the nation. It authorizes loan guarantees for certain renewable energy systems, electric power transmission systems and leading edge biofuels projects that commence construction no later than September 30, 2011. The Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing (ATVM) Loan Program consists of direct loans to support the development of advanced technology vehicles and associated components in the U.S. The more publicized loan guarantee recipients include Solyndra , BrightSource Energy , Ford, Fisker , and Tesla. (See the more complete list of loan recipients at the end of this article.) The Loan Program Office (LPO) has issued conditional commitments to 13 power generation projects with cumulative project costs of over $27 billion. This represents a greater investment in clean energy generation projects than the entire private sector made in 2009 ($10.6 billion), and almost as much as was invested in such projects in 2008 -- the peak financing year to date ($22.6 billion), according to the DOE.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unseen Costs of Solar-Generated Electricity
    THE UNSEEN COSTS OF SOLAR-GENERATED ELECTRICITY Megan E. Hansen, BS, Strata Policy Randy T Simmons, PhD, Utah State University Ryan M. Yonk, PhD, Utah State University The Institute of Political Economy (IPE) at Utah State University seeks to promote a better understanding of the foundations of a free society by conducting research and disseminating findings through publications, classes, seminars, conferences, and lectures. By mentoring students and engaging them in research and writing projects, IPE creates diverse opportunities for students in graduate programs, internships, policy groups, and business. PRIMARY INVESTIGATORS: Megan E. Hansen, BS Strata Policy Randy T Simmons, PhD Utah State University Ryan M. Yonk, PhD Utah State University STUDENT RESEARCH ASSOCIATES: Matthew Crabtree Jordan Floyd Melissa Funk Michael Jensen Josh Smith TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................. 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................................................... 1 Solar Energy and the Grid ............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives
    Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 1 2 Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California: Quality Careers—Cleaner Lives Environmental and Economic Benefits of Building Solar in California Quality Careers — Cleaner Lives DONALD VIAL CENTER ON EMPLOYMENT IN THE GREEN ECONOMY Institute for Research on Labor and Employment University of California, Berkeley November 10, 2014 By Peter Philips, Ph.D. Professor of Economics, University of Utah Visiting Scholar, University of California, Berkeley, Institute for Research on Labor and Employment Peter Philips | Donald Vial Center on Employment in the Green Economy | November 2014 3 About the Author Peter Philips (B.A. Pomona College, M.A., Ph.D. Stanford University) is a Professor of Economics and former Chair of the Economics Department at the University of Utah. Philips is a leading economic expert on the U.S. construction labor market. He has published widely on the topic and has testified as an expert in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims, served as an expert for the U.S. Justice Department in litigation concerning the Davis-Bacon Act (the federal prevailing wage law), and presented testimony to state legislative committees in Ohio, Indiana, Kansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Utah, Kentucky, Connecticut, and California regarding the regulations of construction labor markets.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department Ofthe Interior
    United States Department ofthe Interior FISH AND Wll.DLIFE SERVICE Ventura Fish and Wildlife Office ·' 2493 Portola Road, Suite B Ventura, california 93003 Dl REPLY IUiFlIIlTO: Bl440-201G-F-D096 . 8-8-1G-F-24 , : October 1.2010 ,I DATE-, (CCTO 1 201/) ,1"_ - -.. ". ~ Memorandum. " REeD; (OCT :~ 8 201 To: District Manager, California Desert'District, Bureau ofLand Management, Morenoyalley. CalifO~ From: FielJ?~~v~ru:m FiSh and Wildlife Office. Ventura. California Subject: Biological Opinion on BrightSource Energy's Ivanpah Solar E;lectric Generating System Project, San Bernardino County. California [CACA-48668, 49502, 49503, 49504] (8-8-1O-F-24) This document transmits the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service's (Service) biological opinion based on our review ofthe Bureau ofLand Management's (Bureau) proposed issuance ofa right-of­ way grant to Solar Partners I. LLC. Solar Partners II, LLC, and Solar Partners VIII. LLC for the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (ISEGS) and its effects on the federally threatened desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizil) in accordance with section 7 ofthe Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). Because BrightSource Energy is a parent company for all Solar Partner Companies, this biological opiniO:J;l refers to the project proponents collectively as BrightSource. 'The proposed project involves construction, operation, maintenance,and decommissioning of a 370-megawatt solar thermal power plant and associated infrastructure and facilities on 3.5~2 acres ofpublic land managed by the Bureau. Your December 7, 2009 request for formal consultation was received on December 8, 2009. This biological opinion is based on information that accompanied your December 7, 2009 request for consultation and additional information regarding changes in the project description and tranSlocation strategy obtained from Bureau staff during the formal consultation p~ocess.
    [Show full text]
  • 04-Rasmussen-SW Hydrology 102209 Final.Pptx
    Utility Scale Solar: Reducing Risk for Utilities October 2009 1 Proprietary & Confidential © 2009 BrightSource Energy, Inc. All rights reserved. Presentation Outline ØCorporate Overview Ø Energy Challenge Ø CSP Overview Ø Technology (R&D) Ø Development Ø Environment 2 Proprietary & Confidential © 2009 BrightSource Energy, Inc. All rights reserved. BrightSource Energy Snapshot Mission: To design, build, own and operate the world’s most cost-effective and reliable large scale solar energy projects Ø Business: § Develop and build large-scale solar power generation plants for utilities at prices that compete with fossil-fuel plants, using proprietary LPT technology § Develop and build solar-to-steam plants for industrial applications Ø Locations: § Headquarters in Oakland, California, 52 full-time employees § Wholly-owned subsidiary BrightSource Industries Israel (BSII) located in Jerusalem, 112 full-time employees § Development offices in Phoenix, AZ and Las Vegas, NV 3 Proprietary & Confidential © 2009 BrightSource Energy, Inc. All rights reserved. BrightSource Energy Highlights Ø Proven technology Ø Experienced management team Ø Favorable market and regulatory environment Ø 2.6 GWs of signed PPAs with PG&E and SCE Ø Bechtel as EPC, with a project investment agreement Ø Chevron solar-to-steam project under construction Ø 4 GWs of active site development with a 19 GW portfolio Ø $160 million from blue chip investor base 4 Proprietary & Confidential © 2009 BrightSource Energy, Inc. All rights reserved. BrightSource Energy Renewable Power
    [Show full text]
  • Utilities Join the Party As Solar Power Goes Mainstream
    Release: 5th March 2019 Utilities join the party as solar power goes mainstream The list of the world’s top solar power plant owners released today by Wiki-Solar.org shows that leading energy utilities are building significant solar portfolios. Chinese, US and Indian power companies now have substantial solar capacity in their home markets, while European multinationals are building global portfolios. This marks a major shift – just five years ago there were only six utilities in the top thirty. The top solar generation owners, based on identified cumulative capacity to the end of 2018 were: Plant owners Plants Capacity Rank © wiki-solar.org number MWAC 1 State Power Investment Corporation [CN] 50 2,659 2 NextEra Energy [US] 43 2,627 3 Global Infrastructure Partners [US] 36 2,060 4 ENEL Green Power [IT] 33 2,015 5 Adani [IN] 28 1,957 6 Panda Green Energy [CN] 31 1,832 7 ACME [IN] 32 1,629 8 Southern Power [US] 25 1,494 9 National Thermal Power Corporation [IN] 15 1,391 10 AES Corporation [US] 60 1,301 11 Consolidated Edison Development [US] 25 1,256 12 EDF – Électricité de France [FR] 59 1,182 13 Dominion Energy [US] 42 1,153 14 Lightsource BP [GB] (part owned by BP) 149 1,102 15 Canadian Solar [CA] 28 1,100 16 Enerparc [DE] 141 1,076 17 Cypress Creek Renewables [US] 136 975 18 Sempra Energy [US] 13 941 19 GCL-Poly Energy Holdings [HK] 26 910 Top utility-scale solar generation capacity owners “Leading Chinese and US utilities like SPIC and NextEra have been prominent for some years” says Wiki-Solar founder Philip Wolfe, “while dynamic growth in India has brought utilities like Adani and NTPC into the list.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status of CSP Development
    The Status of CSP Development DISH STIRLING POWER TOWER CLFR Tom Mancini CSP Program Manager Sandia National Laboratories PARABOLIC TROUGH 505.844.8643 DISH STIRLING [email protected] [email protected] 1 Presentation Content • Brief Overview of Sandia National Laboratories • Background information • Examples of CSP Technologies − Parabolic Trough Systems − Power Tower Systems − Thermal Energy Storage − Dish Stirling Systems • Status of CSP Technologies • Cost of CSP and Resource Availability • Deployments • R & D Directions [email protected] 2 Four Mission Areas Sandia’s missions meet national needs in four key areas: • Nuclear Weapons • Defense Systems and Assessments • Energy, Climate and Infrastructure Security • International, Homeland, and Nuclear Security [email protected] 3 Research Drives Capabilities High Performance Nanotechnologies Extreme Computing & Microsystems Environments Computer Materials Engineering Micro Bioscience Pulsed Power Science Sciences Electronics Research Disciplines 4 People and Budget . On-site workforce: 11,677 FY10 operating revenue . Regular employees: 8,607 $2.3 billion 13% . Over 1,500 PhDs and 2,500 MS/MA 13% 43% 31% Technical staff (4,277) by discipline: (Operating Budget) Nuclear Weapons Defense Systems & Assessments Energy, Climate, & Infrastructure Security International, Homeland, and Nuclear Security Computing 16% Math 2% Chemistry 6% Physics 6% Other science 6% Other fields 12% Electrical engineering 21% Mechanical engineering 16% Other engineering 15% 5 Sandia’s NSTTF Dish Engine Engine Test Rotating Testing Facility Platform Established in 1976, we provide ………. • CSP R&D NSTTF • Systems analysis and FMEA • System and Tower Testing Solar Furnace component testing and support NATIONAL SOLAR THERMAL TEST FACILITY [email protected] 6 Labs Support the DOE Program The CSP Programs at Sandia and the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) support the DOE Solar Energy Technology Program.
    [Show full text]
  • DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program FY 2005 Annual
    DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program Cover Photos (clockwise from lower right): On August 8, 2005, President George W. Bush visited the National Solar Thermal Test Facility at Sandia National Laboratories as part of his signing of the Energy Bill. R.J. Montoya Photo National Renewable Energy Laboratory researchers use a computer-controlled data acquisition system at the laboratory’s Outdoor Test Facility to characterize the performance and reliability of PV cells and modules. Jim Yost, PIX14094 A Cornell University student cleans the solar-powered rooftop of his team’s entry in preparation for the 2005 Solar Decathlon competition in Washington, D.C. Stefano Paltera/Solar Decathlon Global Solar Energy, a member of the Thin Film PV Partnership, produces PV material by depositing CIGS (copper indium gallium diselenide) on a lightweight, flexible polymide substrate in roll form. Global Solar Energy, PIX13419 The DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program Raymond A. Sutula, Manager, DOE Solar Energy Technologies Program The Solar Energy Technologies Program, within the U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE), is responsible for developing solar energy technologies that can convert sunlight to useful energy and make that energy available to satisfy a significant portion of our nation's energy needs in a cost-effective way. The Solar Program supports research and development that addresses a wide range of applications, including on- site electricity generation, thermal energy for space heating and hot water, and large-scale power production. This is a great time to be involved with solar energy. Photovoltaic (PV) systems are being installed in the United States and around the world in unprecedented quantities.
    [Show full text]
  • GEMINI SOLAR PROJECT Resource Management Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1: Chapters 1 – 4
    U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management DOI------ BLM NV S010 2018 0051 EIS GEMINI SOLAR PROJECT Resource Management Plan Amendment and Draft Environmental Impact Statement Volume 1: Chapters 1 – 4 EIS Costs to- Date: $4,494,065 i The Bureau of Land Management is responsible for the stewardship of our public lands. The BLM’s mission is to sustain the health, diversity, and productivity of the public lands for the use and enjoyment of present and future generations. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN AMENDMENT AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT FOR THE GEMINI SOLAR PROJECT Responsible Agency: United States Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management Document Status: Draft (X) Final ( ) Abstract: Solar Partners XI, LLC is proposing to construct, operate, maintain, and decommission an approximately 690-megawatt photovoltaic solar electric generating facility and associated generation tie-line and access road facilities (Project) on approximately 7,100 acres of federal lands administered by the Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management (BLM). The Project would be located approximately 33 miles northeast of Las Vegas and south of the Moapa River Indian Reservation in Clark County, Nevada. The expected life of the Project is 30 years. Solar Partners XI, LLC acquired an existing 44,000-acre right-of- way application filed in 2008 by BrightSource Energy, LLC for the APEX Solar Thermal Power Generation Facility. The approximately 7,100-acre Project would be located within the 44,000-acre right- of-way application area. The 1998 Las Vegas Resource Management Plan (RMP) classifies the right-of-way application area as a Class III Visual Resource Management (VRM) area, which lies adjacent to Class II areas (due to the presence of the Old Spanish National Historic Trail, Muddy Mountain Wilderness Area, and Bitter Springs Back Country Byway in the Project vicinity).
    [Show full text]
  • The Ivanpah Solar Project Named 2012 Energy Project of the Year
    THE IVANPAH SOLAR PROJECT NAMED 2012 ENERGY PROJECT OF THE YEAR Project recognized for its innovative approach, job creation and scale of clean energy production (LOS ANGELES, Calif.) April 24, 2012 – NRG Energy, Google, BrightSource Energy and EPC partner Bechtel announced that the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System (Ivanpah SEGS) received the 2012 Energy Project of the Year Award by the USC CMAA Green Symposium. Ivanpah SEGS in California’s Mojave Desert is currently the world’s largest concentrating solar power (CSP) plant under construction. When completed, it will nearly double the amount of solar thermal electricity produced in the US. “The sheer magnitude of the Ivanpah project is reinforcing California's position as the leader of renewable energy in the United States,” said Caroline Fletcher, USC Green Symposium Co- Chair. “The project has demonstrated an innovative approach to partnerships and is significantly contributing to job creation in the region. We’re very pleased to honor this important project with our 2012 Energy Project of the Year Award.” “Ivanpah is a flagship project, widely recognized for its environmentally-responsible design, and lauded for its role in helping to grow Southern California’s High Desert economy,” said Joe Desmond, SVP of Government Relations and Communications, BrightSource Energy. “We look forward to completing this important solar power facility and help California meet its economic and clean energy goals.” “We are pleased to be a part of this award-winning project. The innovation applied to the engineering and construction of Ivanpah will help advance the renewable energy industry and make solar energy a viable option for more people,” said Jim Ivany, president of renewable power at Bechtel.
    [Show full text]
  • Q4 2018 / Q1 2019 Solar Industry Update
    Q4 2018/Q1 2019 Solar Industry Update David Feldman Robert Margolis May 2019 NREL/PR-6A20-73992 Executive Summary • At the end of 2018, global PV installations reached 509 GW-DC, • The United States installed 10.7 GW-DC of PV in 2018 (8.3 GW- an annual increase of 102 GW-DC from 2017. AC), with 4.2 GW-DC coming in Q4—cumulative capacity reached 62.5 GW-DC (49.7 GW-AC). – In 2018, the leading markets in terms of annual deployment were China (44 GW-DC), the United States (11 GW-DC), and – Analysts also expect U.S. PV capacity to double by 2022. India (8 GW-DC). • In 2018, global PV shipments were approximately 89 GW—a Analysts expect cumulative PV capacity to double by 2022. – decrease of 5% from 2017. More than 96% of those PV shipments used c-Si technology and were shipped from Asian • At the end of 2018, cumulative global CSP installations reached countries. 6.2 GW, up 710 MW from 2017. • In 2018, the United States produced approximately 1 GW of c-Si • Solar installations represented 22% of all new U.S. electric modules and 0.4 GW of thin film. generation capacity in 2018—second to natural gas (58%). – The United States expanded its PV manufacturing capacity • In 2018, solar represented 4.6% of net summer capacity and to 6 GW in Q1 2019 (up from 2.5 GW in 2017), and it is 2.3% of annual net generation. expected to add another 3 GW in the near future.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Assessment
    Environmental Assessment Turning Point Solar Generating Project Noble County, Ohio Turning Point Solar LLC U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service (RUS) Please submit questions or written comments to: Lauren McGee Environmental Scientist USDA/RUS 1400 Independence Ave., SW Mail Stop 1571 Washington, DC 20250-1571 Phone: (202) 720-1482 Fax: (202) 690-0649 Email: [email protected] ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT TURNING POINT SOLAR PROJECT Brookfield Township, Noble County, Ohio Prepared for: U.S. Department of Agriculture Rural Utilities Service January 2012 Prepared by: URS Corporation Cleveland, Ohio Rural Utilities Service Turning Point Solar Project TABLE OF CONTENTS Page No. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.....................................................................................................ES-1 1.0 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROPOSED ACTION.............................................1-1 1.1 Introduction ...............................................................................................................1-1 1.2 Proposed Action.........................................................................................................1-3 1.3 Applicant’s Purpose and Need ..................................................................................1-5 2.0 ALTERNATIVES ANALYSIS AND DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED ACTION......................................................................................................................................2-1 2.1 Project Alternatives That Meet the Purpose and Need...............................................2-1
    [Show full text]