DOCSLIB.ORG

Temporary Shelter in District and City of Central Sulawesi

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Temporary Shelter in District and City of Central Sulawesi Supported by: Shelter Sub Cluster Team, February 28, 2020 The shelter sub cluster support team Supported by: The shelter sub cluster support team PROGRESS ON TEMPORARY SHELTER IN DISTRICT AND CITY OF CENTRAL SULAWESI MAP CATEGORY Districts/City (ALL) U CENTRAL SULAWESI Activity Progress Table Huntara Nu. DISTRICTS/CITY Agencies Planned Pipeline OnGoing CompletedNeeds GAP Needs vs Plan Needs vs Plan vs Balaesang 1 DONGGALA 24 7140 7096 572 6085 7267 1182 Completed Completed Balaesang Tanjung 2 PALU 27 6409 6222 351 5770 12854 7084 Sirenja 3 SIGI 44 12961 12569 967 11398 13144 1746 Sindue Tobata Sindue Tombusabora 4 PARIGI MOUNTONG 0 80% 70% 88% Sindue Labuan Banawa Tawaeli Banawa Tengah Tanantovea Palu Utara Banawa Selatan Ulujadi Palu Timur Palu Barat Mantikulore PROGRESS CHART Marawola Barat Tatanga Palu Selatan Dolo Sigi Biromaru Dolo Barat Pinembani Tanambulava Palolo 70% 8%2% 20% Dolo Selatan Nokilalaki Gumbasa Lindu 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Kulawi Completed Pipeline Planned Needs Kulawi Selatan 1,890 ACTIVITY PROGRESS Pipikoro 23,253 25,887 26,510 GAP = Needs vs Completed Total Agencies : 66 GAP = Needs vs Completed 33,265 Legend ( % ) DISPLACED GAP of NEEDs NEEDs vs PLAN vs COMPLETED DAMAGED HOUSES 0 Kebutuhan : 33,265 Not yet Lost : 3,673 Completed 10,012 38% 11398 13144 12961 1 Rencana : 26,510 12854 Heavy : 29,592 60 Didanai : 25,887 Not yet 31% Mod. : 25,251 6,755 7267 80 Berjalan : 1,890 Planned 7140 Light : 35,846 6409 27% 6085 90 Selesai : 23,253 AFFECTED VILLAGES 5770 Total : 90,689 53,172 172,999 4% Already inhabited Population Displaced Soul HH 322 Heavy : Lost : Mod. : Light : DONGGALA PALU SIGI Needs are calculated based on the number of heavy damaged houses and lost houses (Source: PUSDATINA. Feb-2019) Pusdatina Source Planned Pipeline OnGoing Completed Needs Supported by: The shelter sub cluster support team Temporary Shelter (Household) PROGRESS CHART 70% 8%2% 20% 0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100% Completed Pipeline Planned Needs 1,890 ACTIVITY PROGRESS 23,253 25,887 26,510 GAP = Needs vs Completed 33,265 Supported by: The shelter sub cluster support team PROGRESS ON TEMPORARY SHELTER CONSTRUCTION EVERY TWO WEEKS - PASIGALA 33,265 33,265 Needs vs Plan Plan vs Needs vs 27,223 27,367 26,340 26,661 26,711 26,711 27,069 26,256 26,451 26,510 Completed Completed 26,667 26,355 25,353 26,152 25,52925,721 25,721 25,761 26,092 26,092 25,887 24,929 25,141 24,011 24,220 24,499 24,402 23,05623,224 23,07923,090 23,371 22,560 23,253 22,515 22,434 22,053 22,810 22,922 21,700 21,574 80% 70% 88% 20,754 21,282 20,831 21,151 20,506 20,833 19,648 18,86718,977 19,152 18,351 331 16,72216,965 16,718 16,208 15,698 14,583 13,260 11,934 10,87010,561 9,356 5,893 4,783 4,805 4,122 4,560 3,595 3,370 2,984 2,656 2,674 3,065 2,557 2,728 2,750 2,103 2,171 2,149 2,074 2,438 2,326 1,890 15-Feb 15-Feb 1-Mar 15-Mar 5-Apr 26-Apr 10-May 24-May 5-Jul 19-Jul 2-Aug 16-Aug 13-Sep 27-Sep 25-Oct 8-Nov 22-Nov 6-Dec 20-Dec 24-Jan 7-Feb 28-Feb Needs 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 33,265 Planned 22,515 23,056 23,224 24,011 26,667 27,223 24,220 24,499 25,529 25,721 25,721 26,355 27,069 27,367 26,256 26,340 26,451 26,661 26,711 26,711 26,510 Pipeline 16,208 16,722 16,965 20,754 21,282 21,700 20,831 21,151 22,434 23,079 23,090 23,371 24,402 24,929 25,141 25,353 25,761 26,152 26,092 26,092 25,887 Ongoing 9,356 4,783 4,805 4,122 4,560 3,595 3,370 2,984 2,103 2,171 2,149 2,074 2,656 2,674 3,065 2,557 2,728 2,750 2,438 2,326 1,890 Complete 5,893 10,870 10,561 11,934 13,260 14,583 15,698 16,718 18,351 18,867 18,977 19,152 19,648 20,506 20,833 21,574 22,053 22,560 22,810 22,922 23,253 Supported by: The shelter sub cluster support team PROGRESS ON TEMPORARY SHELTER IN DONGGALA DISTRICT MAP CATEGORY DISTRICT DONGGALA U CENTRAL SULAWESI Activity Progress Table Huntara Nu. SUBDISTRICTS Agencies Planned Pipeline OnGoing CompletedNeeds GAP Needs vs Plan Needs vs Plan vs Balaesang 1 BALAESANG 4 978 978 173 805 352 OVER 453 Completed Completed Balaesang Tanjung 2 BALAESANG TANJUNG 2 408 408 4 404 443 39 Sirenja 3 BANAWA 4 778 778 19 759 915 156 Sindue Tobata Sindue Tombusabora 4 BANAWA SELATAN 0 278 278 98% 84% 85% Sindue Labuan 5 BANAWA TENGAH 5 585 585 55 530 770 240 Banawa Banawa Tengah Tanantovea 6 LABUAN 2 596 596 596 506 OVER 90 Banawa Selatan 7 PINEMBANI 0 PROGRESS CHART 8 SINDUE 12 1179 1169 168 967 906 OVER 61 Pinembani 9 SINDUE TOBATA 2 80 80 80 247 167 84% 14% 1%2% 10 SINDUE TOMBUSABORA 3 285 285 1 284 521 237 75% 80% 85% 90% 95% 100% 11 SIRENJA 8 1883 1883 152 1343 1699 356 Completed Pipeline Planned Needs 12 TANANTOVEA 5 368 334 317 630 313 572 ACTIVITY PROGRESS 6,085 7,096 7,140 GAP = Needs vs Completed Total Agencies : 24 GAP = Needs vs Completed 7,267 Legend ( % ) DISPLACED GAP of NEEDs NEEDs vs PLAN vs COMPLETED DAMAGED HOUSES 0 Kebutuhan : 7,267 Not yet Lost : 1,182 1883 Completed 1699 37% 1 Rencana : 7,140 1343 Heavy : 7,267 1179 978 967 915 60 Didanai : 7,096 Not yet 906 34% Mod. : 6,054 805 778 770 759 630 596 596 585 530 127 521 506 443 408 Planned 404 368 80 Berjalan : 572 352 Light : 7,941 317 285 284 247 28% 80 90 Selesai : 6,085 AFFECTED VILLAGES 80 Total : 21,262 36,346 11,478 0% Already inhabited Population Displaced Soul HH 116 Heavy : Lost : Mod. : Light : Needs are calculated based on the number of heavy damaged houses and lost houses (Source: PUSDATINA. Feb-2019) Pusdatina Source Planned Pipeline OnGoing Completed Needs Note : Huntara = Temporary Shelter Supported by: The shelter sub cluster support team PROGRESS ON TEMPORARY SHELTER CONSTRUCTION EVERY TWO WEEKS - DONGGALA 7,248 7,140 7,140 7,267 7,171 7,242 7,167 7,096 7,140 7,038 6,983 7,067 7,096 7,096 6,810 6,933 6,873 6,915 6,721 6,639 6,762 6,610 6,610 6,505 6,478 7,167 6,286 6,323 Needs vs Plan Needs vs Plan vs 6,174 6,228 6,176 6,079 6,033 5,998 6,078 6,089 5,967 6,085 Completed Completed 5,883 5,823 5,644 5,542 5,659 5,377 5,329 5,218 4,878 84% 4,833 4,706 6 98% 85% 4,416 4,426 4,477 4,532 4,224 4,309 4,262 3,708 3,439 3,002 2,585 2,586 2,436 2,102 2,186 1,662 1,316 1,393 1,256 1,166 1,123 916 806 738 725 777 834 809 591 590 646 646 645 690 578 572 15-Feb 15-Feb 1-Mar 15-Mar 5-Apr 26-Apr 10-May24-May 5-Jul 19-Jul 2-Aug 16-Aug 13-Sep 27-Sep 25-Oct 8-Nov 22-Nov 6-Dec 20-Dec 24-Jan 7-Feb 28-Feb Needs 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 7,267 Planned 6,174 6,286 6,810 6,933 6,721 6,873 5,644 5,542 6,176 6,610 6,610 7,038 7,171 6,915 6,983 7,067 7,242 7,248 7,140 7,140 7,140 Pipeline 4,224 4,309 4,833 6,228 5,883 6,033 5,329 5,218 5,998 6,078 6,089 6,323 6,505 6,478 6,639 6,762 7,167 7,167 7,096 7,096 7,096 Ongoing 2,585 1,256 1,316 1,166 1,662 1,393 1,123 738 591 590 646 646 725 777 916 645 834 809 690 578 572 Complete 806 2,102 2,186 2,436 2,586 3,002 3,439 3,708 4,262 4,416 4,426 4,477 4,532 4,706 4,878 5,377 5,659 5,823 5,967 6,079 6,085 Supported by: The shelter sub cluster support team GAP : NEEDS VS PLANNED DONGGALA DISTRICT Huntara U KAB. DONGGALA Nu. SUBDISTRICTS Agencies Planned Pipeline OnGoing CompletedNeeds GAP Balaesang 1 BALAESANG 4 978 978 173 805 352 OVER 626 2 BALAESANG TANJUNG 2 408 408 4 404 443 35 Balaesang Tanjung Sirenja 3 BANAWA 4 778 778 19 759 915 137 4 BANAWA SELATAN 0 278 Sindue Tobata 5 BANAWA TENGAH 5 585 585 55 530 770 185 Sindue Tombusabora 6 LABUAN 2 596 596 596 506 OVER 90 Labuan Sindue -3 7 PINEMBANI 0 Banawa Tanantovea 8 SINDUE 12 1179 1169 168 967 906 OVER 273 0 Banawa Tengah 0 0 9 SINDUE TOBATA 2 80 80 80 247 167 Banawa Selatan PALU PARIGI 10 SINDUE TOMBUSABORA 3 285 285 1 284 521 236 MOUNTONG 11 SIRENJA 8 1883 1883 152 1343 1699 OVER 184 Pinembani 12 TANANTOVEA 5 368 334 317 630 262 SIGI Total Agencies : 24 GAP = Needs vs Planned Activity progress table : Temporary shelters Supported by: The shelter sub cluster support team GAP : PLANNED VS COMPLETED Huntara U KAB.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Tsunami Deposits of the September 28, 2018 Palu Earthquake, Sulawesi, Indonesia
    Geophysical Research Abstracts Vol. 21, EGU2019-6290, 2019 EGU General Assembly 2019 © Author(s) 2019. CC Attribution 4.0 license. The tsunami deposits of the September 28, 2018 Palu earthquake, Sulawesi, Indonesia. Adam D. Switzer (1,2), Jedrzej M. Majewski (1,2), Rachel YS. Guan (1,2), Benazir Benazir (3), Ella Meilianda (3), Peter R. Parham (1), Jessica Pilarczyk (4), Hermann Fritz (5), Robert Weiss (6), Benjamin P. Horton (1,2) (1) Earth Observatory of Singapore, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore ([email protected]), (2) Asian School of the Environment, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, (3) Tsunami and Disaster Mitigation Research Center, Syiah Kuala University, Banda Aceh, Indonesia, (4) Centre for Natural Hazards Research, Department of Earth Sciences, Simon Fraser University, Canada, (5) School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, USA, (6) School of Geosciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, USA On 28 September 2018, a large, shallow, magnitude 7.5 earthquake struck north of Palu, Central Sulawesi, In- donesia at 6:03 pm local time. The earthquake generated a tsunami with inundation depths up to 10 m high and inundation distances in excess of 400m. The tsunami was likely generated by a combination of minor fault dis- placement and multiple submarine landslides. In addition to the tsunami the region experienced co-seismic coastal subsidence that in places exceeded 1m and likely exacerbated the inundation of tsunami waves in some areas including Palu city. During a post tsunami survey in November 2018 we sampled four transects for sediment anal- ysis; two in Palu City and one each on the eastern and western coasts of Palu Bay.
    [Show full text]
  • The 2018 Mw 7.5 Palu Earthquake: a Supershear Rupture Event Constrained by Insar and Broadband Regional Seismograms
    remote sensing Article The 2018 Mw 7.5 Palu Earthquake: A Supershear Rupture Event Constrained by InSAR and Broadband Regional Seismograms Jin Fang 1, Caijun Xu 1,2,3,* , Yangmao Wen 1,2,3 , Shuai Wang 1, Guangyu Xu 1, Yingwen Zhao 1 and Lei Yi 4,5 1 School of Geodesy and Geomatics, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China; [email protected] (J.F.); [email protected] (Y.W.); [email protected] (S.W.); [email protected] (G.X.); [email protected] (Y.Z.) 2 Key Laboratory of Geospace Environment and Geodesy, Ministry of Education, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China 3 Collaborative Innovation Center of Geospatial Technology, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430079, China 4 Key Laboratory of Comprehensive and Highly Efficient Utilization of Salt Lake Resources, Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China; [email protected] 5 Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Geology and Environment of Salt Lakes, Qinghai Institute of Salt Lakes, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Xining 810008, China * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +86-27-6877-8805 Received: 4 April 2019; Accepted: 29 May 2019; Published: 3 June 2019 Abstract: The 28 September 2018 Mw 7.5 Palu earthquake occurred at a triple junction zone where the Philippine Sea, Australian, and Sunda plates are convergent. Here, we utilized Advanced Land Observing Satellite-2 (ALOS-2) interferometry synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) data together with broadband regional seismograms to investigate the source geometry and rupture kinematics of this earthquake. Results showed that the 2018 Palu earthquake ruptured a fault plane with a relatively steep dip angle of ~85◦.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Trade Networks in Maluku in the 16Th, 17Th and 18Th Centuries
    CAKALELEVOL. 2, :-f0. 2 (1991), PP. LOCAL TRADE NETWORKS IN MALUKU IN THE 16TH, 17TH, AND 18TH CENTURIES LEONARD Y. ANDAYA U:-fIVERSITY OF From an outsider's viewpoint, the diversity of language and ethnic groups scattered through numerous small and often inaccessible islands in Maluku might appear to be a major deterrent to economic contact between communities. But it was because these groups lived on small islands or in forested larger islands with limited arable land that trade with their neighbors was an economic necessity Distrust of strangers was often overcome through marriage or trade partnerships. However, the most . effective justification for cooperation among groups in Maluku was adherence to common origin myths which established familial links with societies as far west as Butung and as far east as the Papuan islands. I The records of the Dutch East India Company housed in the State Archives in The Hague offer a useful glimpse of the operation of local trading networks in Maluku. Although concerned principally with their own economic activities in the area, the Dutch found it necessary to understand something of the nature of Indigenous exchange relationships. The information, however, never formed the basis for a report, but is scattered in various documents in the form of observations or personal experiences of Dutch officials. From these pieces of information it is possible to reconstruct some of the complexity of the exchange in MaJuku in these centuries and to observe the dynamism of local groups in adapting to new economic developments in the area. In addition to the Malukans, there were two foreign groups who were essential to the successful integration of the local trade networks: the and the Chinese.
    [Show full text]
  • Kareba Palu Koro News on Central Sulawesi Emergency Response
    december 2018 - II issue #4 KAREBA PALU KORO NEWS ON CENTRAL SULAWESI EMERGENCY RESPONSE The impact of flash flood (11/12) in Salua. Photo: Titik Susana Ristiawaty/ERCB FLASH FLOOD IN SALUA, BATHING WASHING AND LATRINE FACILITIES WERE SWEPT AWAY On Tuesday 11 December evening, again flash flood struck and more,” said Dewi. Salua Village, Kulawi Sub-District, Sigi District, especially in RT “With this current situation, where should we stay now?” Dewi (neighborhood cluster) 1 and RT 2 which are located in Hamlet 3 continued talking and wiping her tears while looking at her (Note: a hamlet is divided into several RWs and one RW consists ruined house. of several RTs.) The event occurred at 7.30 p.m. local time when There are 79 households impacted by the flash flood. The 79 the community were praying in a local mosque and they were houses are damaged and 40 among them are seriously damaged shocked by the sound of roaring water. and could not be inhabited. The height of the muddy water is as “When I was praying last night, suddenly I heard a women high as the knee of an adult. Small bars of wood are mixing with crying and screaming, saying that the water had reached the mud and the flood water. community settlement,” said Jusman Lahudo (59), a Salua Village “Up to now (12 p.m. local time) the water is still flowing in Salua community member. According to him, the flash flood was Village and some heavy equipment are trying to clean up the the hugest and the worst one ever since 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • Selection of LNG Receiving Ports
    Chapter 4 Selection of LNG Receiving Ports January 2021 This chapter should be cited as ERIA (2021), ‘Selection of LNG Receiving Ports’, in Kimura, S., et al. (eds.), Feasible Solutions to Deliver LNG to Midsized and Large Islands in Indonesia. ERIA Research Project Report FY2020 no.18, Jakarta: ERIA, pp.22-30. Chapter 4 Selection of LNG Receiving Ports In this chapter, we proposed the locations of LNG receiving ports by using a methodology that considers several factors. First, we looked at the forecasted LNG demand in Eastern Indonesia as estimated in chapter 3. Second, in each region we gathered all seaports that are geographically close to the existing or planned-to-be-developed natural gas–fired or dual- engine power plants. Third, we gathered information on the profile of those seaports. Finally, considering the specifications of the model LNG carrier vessels, we selected several seaports as LNG receiving ports based on the accessibility of those seaports. In section 4.1, we presented the initial candidates for LNG receiving terminals (ports) based on the location of the existing seaports, the forecasted LNG demand and the existing and planned GPPs. In section 4.2, we selected LNG carrier vessels and presented their characteristics. Finally, in section 4.3, we presented the selected receiving ports based on their accessibility for the model ships. 1. Regions and the Potential LNG Receiving Ports Chapter 3 identified 21 regions that include cities and small islands where potential LNG demand for power generation would likely be generated in the future, i.e. in the 2040 horizon.
    [Show full text]
  • WFP Indonesia Country Brief (GFFO), the Office of U.S
    WFP Indonesia Highlights Country Brief October 2018 WFP is supporting the Government of Indonesia and the ASEAN Coordinating Centre for Humanitarian Assistance (AHA Centre) on logistics, food security and livelihoods following the 7.4-magnitude earthquake and tsunami in Central Sulawesi. With the Ministry of Education and Culture (MoEC), WFP conducted a joint capacity strengthening and advocacy mission to Natuna (Kepulauan Riau province) as one of the national school meals programme (ProGas) targeted districts. The District Government of Natuna through BAPPEDA will allocate IDR 2.2 billion Operational Context under the Provincial Budget (APBD) for supporting ProGas implementation in Natuna. Indonesia is a lower-middle-income country with a Gross National Income (GNI) of USD 3,400 per capita (World Bank, US$ 2.5 m six months (Nov 2018-Apr 2019) net 2016). It is ranked 73rd out of 118 countries on the 2018 funding requirements. Global Hunger Index. The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) estimates the Operational Updates prevalence of undernourishment declined to 7.6 percent in 2014–2016, from 19.7 percent in 1990–1992. Indonesia’s . In addition to supporting the Ministry of Social national poverty rate in 2017 was 10.7 percent. Affairs (MoSA) and the National Disaster Trends in economic growth, life expectancy and education Management Agency (BNPB), WFP is providing are positive and food security improved between 2009 and logistics services, information management and 2015. However, 58 out of 398 rural districts were found to coordination. Five mobile storage units (MSUs) have be highly vulnerable to food insecurity and malnutrition is been erected to provide common storage services still widespread.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia's Transformation and the Stability of Southeast Asia
    INDONESIA’S TRANSFORMATION and the Stability of Southeast Asia Angel Rabasa • Peter Chalk Prepared for the United States Air Force Approved for public release; distribution unlimited ProjectR AIR FORCE The research reported here was sponsored by the United States Air Force under Contract F49642-01-C-0003. Further information may be obtained from the Strategic Planning Division, Directorate of Plans, Hq USAF. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Rabasa, Angel. Indonesia’s transformation and the stability of Southeast Asia / Angel Rabasa, Peter Chalk. p. cm. Includes bibliographical references. “MR-1344.” ISBN 0-8330-3006-X 1. National security—Indonesia. 2. Indonesia—Strategic aspects. 3. Indonesia— Politics and government—1998– 4. Asia, Southeastern—Strategic aspects. 5. National security—Asia, Southeastern. I. Chalk, Peter. II. Title. UA853.I5 R33 2001 959.804—dc21 2001031904 Cover Photograph: Moslem Indonesians shout “Allahu Akbar” (God is Great) as they demonstrate in front of the National Commission of Human Rights in Jakarta, 10 January 2000. Courtesy of AGENCE FRANCE-PRESSE (AFP) PHOTO/Dimas. RAND is a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. RAND® is a registered trademark. RAND’s publications do not necessarily reflect the opinions or policies of its research sponsors. Cover design by Maritta Tapanainen © Copyright 2001 RAND All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form by any electronic or mechanical means (including photocopying,
    [Show full text]
  • Limitations and Challenges of Early Warning Systems
    United Nations Intergovernmental Educational, Scientific and Oceanographic Cultural Organization Commission LIMITATIONS AND CHALLENGES OF EARLY WARNING SYSTEMS CASE STUDY: PALU-DONGGALA TSUNAMI 28 SEPTEMBER 2018 September 2019 IOC Technical Series: IOC/2019/TS/150 Copyright UNDRR © 2019 Research Team Ahmad Arif (Kompas) Irina Rafliana (LIPI) Ardito M. Kodijat (IOTIC of UNESCO-IOC) Syarifah Dalimunthe (LIPI/Nagoya University) Research Assistant Martaseno Stambuk (Universitas Tadulako) Dicky Fernando (Universitas Tadulako) Coordination and Guidance Herry Yogaswara (LIPI) Loretta Hieber Girardet (UNDRR) Shahbaz Khan (UNESCO Office Jakarta) Reviewer Team Fery Irawan (BNPB) Daryono (BMKG) Animesh Kumar (UNDRR) English Translation Ariyantri E Tarman English Editor Ardito M. Kodijat Neil Richard Britton Design and Layout Box Breaker Published in Jakarta, Indonesia Citation: UNDRR and UNESCO-IOC (2019), Limitations and Challenges of Early Warning Systems: A Case Study of the 2018 Palu-Donggala Tsunami. United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR), Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, and the Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission of United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (IOC Technical Series N° 150) The findings, interpretations, and conclusions expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of UNDRR and UNESCO or of the United Nations Secretariat, partners, and governments, and are based on the inputs received during consultative meetings, individual interviews, and the literature review by the research team. This research is dedicated to victims and survivors of tsunamis in Indonesia and in other countries. Palu-Donggala Tsunami Case Study, 28 September 2018 iii Table of contents List of figures v List of photo vi List of tables vii Abbreviations used viii Foreword ix Summary xi 1.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 M7.5 Earthquake Indonesia
    2018 M7.5 Earthquake Indonesia Activation: 2018 M7.5 Earthquake Indonesia Situation Report – period covered: September 28 - October 2, 2018 Prepared by: Humanity Road / Animals in Disaster Situation Overview Highlights: The following situation report was compiled based on social media monitoring from the public impacted and through data mining for information from official sources. It does not represent all locations impacted but does cover the heaviest hit areas. Humanity Road provides this information as a service to the public and our partners responding to the disaster. We are available for special reporting needs by sending an email to [email protected]. ​ ​ The Government of Indonesia, through BNPB and Ministry of Foreign Affairs, have welcomed offers of international assistance as of 1 October 2018. This statement was also delivered by BNPB during Emergency Briefing and Coordination Meeting Partners at AHA Centre Emergency Operations Centre on 1 October, 10.00 hrs. And repeated during BNPB's Press Conference at 1300 hrs. Twitter handles Facebook pages @Humanityroad Humanity Road @Disasteranimals Animals in Disaster @jAidDog @DAFNReady About Humanity Road: Founded in 2010 as a 501(c)3 non-profit corporation, Humanity Road is a ​ ​ ​ leader in the field of online disaster response. Through skilled and self-directed work teams, Humanity Road and its network of global volunteers aim to provide the public and disaster responders worldwide with timely and accurate aid information. Providing such information helps individuals
    [Show full text]
  • Review of Policies and Institutional Capacity for Early Warning and Disaster Management in Indonesia January 2007
    U.S. INDIAN OCEAN TSUNAMI WARNING SYSTEM (US IOTWS) PROGRAM REVIEW OF POLICIES AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY FOR EARLY WARNING AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA JANUARY 2007 January 2007 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by the IRG-Tetra Tech Joint Venture. U.S. INDIAN OCEAN TSUNAMI WARNING SYSTEM (US IOTWS) PROGRAM REVIEW OF POLICIES AND INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY FOR EARLY WARNING AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT IN INDONESIA (OCTOBER 1-13, 2006) JANUARY 2007 Prepared for U.S. Agency for International Development by IRG & Tetra Tech Joint Venture under Contract No. EPP-I-02-04-00024-00 U.S. IOTWS Program Document No.14-IOTWS-06 DISCLAIMER The views expressed in this document do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. CONTENTS Acronyms ................................................................................................................ 1 Preface ..................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 4 1. Policy and Legislative Environment for Disaster Management .................... 6 1.1 Legislative Environment .......................................................................................................... 6 1.2 Institutional Environment ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Land Relations Between Access, Exclusion and Resistance in Jambi Province, Indonesia
    A post-frontier in transformation: land relations between access, exclusion and resistance in Jambi province, Indonesia Dissertation zur Erlangung des mathematisch-naturwissenschaftlichen Doktorgrades "Doctor rerum naturalium" der Georg-August-Universität Göttingen im Promotionsprogramm Geowissenschaften/Geographie der Georg-August University School of Science (GAUSS) vorgelegt von Dipl. Geogr. Barbara Beckert aus Erlangen Göttingen 2016 Betreuungsausschuss Prof. Dr. Christoph Dittrich Abteilung Humangeographie, Geographisches Institut, Fakultät für Geowissenschaften und Geographie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Prof. Dr. Heiko Faust Abteilung Humangeographie, Geographisches Institut, Fakultät für Geowissenschaften und Geographie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Mitglieder der Prüfungskommission Referent: Prof. Dr. Christoph Dittrich Abteilung Humangeographie, Geographisches Institut, Fakultät für Geowissenschaften und Geographie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Korreferent: Prof. Dr. Heiko Faust Abteilung Humangeographie, Geographisches Institut, Fakultät für Geowissenschaften und Geographie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Weitere Mitglieder der Prüfungskommission Prof. Dr. Lasafam Iturrizaga, Abteilung Physische Geographie, Geographisches Institut, Fakultät für Geowissenschaften und Geographie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Jun.-Prof. Dr. Dirk Felzmann, Arbeitsbereich Geographie und ihre Didaktik, Geographisches Institut, Fakultät für Geowissenschaften und Geographie, Georg-August-Universität Göttingen Dr. Lukas
    [Show full text]
  • Kuwaittimes 21-3-2019.Qxp Layout 1
    RAJAB 14, 1440 AH THURSDAY, MARCH 21, 2019 28 Pages Max 27º Min 12º 150 Fils Established 1961 ISSUE NO: 17787 The First Daily in the Arabian Gulf www.kuwaittimes.net Kuwait drops 6 places in Indian fugitive celebrity Kazakhstan renames capital Harden completes set as 392019 happiness rankings jeweler arrested in London 24 as new president takes office 28 Rockets trounce Hawks Amir holds talks with Pompeo on Kuwait-US relations, issues US-Kuwaiti Strategic Dialogue held • FM: Visit significant amidst regional developments By Faten Omar and Agencies KUWAIT: HH the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al- Jaber Al-Sabah, with the attendance of HH the Crown Prince Sheikh Nawaf Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah, received at Bayan Palace yesterday Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Sheikh Sabah Al-Khaled Al-Hamad Al-Sabah, who was accompanied by visiting US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, who conveyed greetings of US President Donald Trump to HH the Amir. During the meeting, the Amir also relayed his greetings to Trump, and discussed a number of issues of mutual interest and the historical relations between the two nations. At a joint press conference later yesterday at the foreign ministry, Sheikh Sabah Al-Khaled said Pompeo’s “significant” visit to Kuwait comes amidst “critical” regional developments. “In light of such global changes, we keenly listened to the wise directives of His Highness the Amir Sheikh Sabah Al-Ahmad Al-Jaber Al-Sabah,” he said. Sheikh Sabah Al-Khaled’s remarks came after holding the third US-Kuwaiti Strategic Dialogue, with Pompeo heading the US side.
    [Show full text]