Arxiv:1308.3997V1 [Cond-Mat.Str-El] 19 Aug 2013 Ings Nw Stejh-Elr(T Feti Igemolecule

arXiv:1308.3997v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 19 Aug 2013 ings nw steJh-elr(T feti igemolecule. single a in effect interac (JT) Jahn-Teller orbital-lattice the an as by known electro caused the is of This shape a function. lat wave to macroscopic compatible is a or- which with long-range distortion accompanied tice A generally solids. is molecular order as bital well or- r as orbital compounds, magnets, transition-metal an several earth termed in seen function, often wave is der, orbital degenerate a co of in properties materials. structural signif electron and lated influences freedom optical, of magnetic, r degree icantly widely orbital is the It that function. ognized wave electronic of aspect rectional yCrtadLyon-Caen, and Cyrot magnon. by of that with comparison in simple o so of latti not assignment and experimental is an biton orbiton and between small, b negligibly coupling not might that is This fact yet. a revealed to been attributed not have orbiton of teristics supports rio yotcladRmnspectroscopies, Raman and observatio optical by experimental orbiton mag Several a in state. excitation ordered spin-wave “or to netically termed analogous is an is object This quantized biton”. its and wave” “orbital termed es 02,weeteltiedsoto sitrrtdto in interpreted treatment coworkers frozen-lattice is adiabatic and distortion The lattice authors frozen. the present where the 20–22, wer of wave Refs. orbital one of by calculations performed realistic spin-orbi More ele as model. correlated a tron well on based as examined were excitations excitations coupled orbital electronic purely iia ierculn ewe rio n hnnmodes TmVO phonon in and occurs. examined orbiton branches are between anticrossing- phonon coupling an and where linear orbiton 24 Similar Ref. between in mixing adopted type was for effect approach coupling muc JT weak is the A energy energy. phonon excitation the orbital than the higher where case limiting the in na ria ree tt eesuidi e.2,whe 28, Ref. in studied were state ordered orbital an in tions b have center intensively. JT single examined a in excitations vibronic side, other olcieobtlectto na ria ree state ordered orbital an in excitation orbital collective A di- a represents electron an of freedom of degree Orbital h rttertcleaiaino ria aewsdone was wave orbital of examination theoretical first The 8–12 n te xeietlpoe,a ela theoretical as well as probes, experimental other and 13–17 irncEctto yaisi rial eeeaeCorr Degenerate Orbitally in Dynamics Excitation Vibronic aebe eotds a.Nntees charac- Nonetheless, far. so reported been have ASnmes 52.k 75.30.Et,75.47.Lx 75.25.Dk, numbers: PACS respectively. systems. coupled interactions, Flanc orbital-lattice inter-site and the mode, by vibronic modified collective ter a w as from identified low-energy valid are a is These coexist; method modes generalize Present excitation We characteristic Two footing. account. equal into an states vibronic on vibronic local with both dealt are where teractions framework, theoretical a present ria-atc ope xiaindnmc norbitally in dynamics excitation coupled Orbital-lattice .INTRODUCTION I. 27 1,2 4 npriua,lclvboi excita- vibronic local particular, In arsoi ymtybreaking symmetry macroscopic A n eae materials. related and 18 n Komarov and eateto hsc,Thk nvriy edi980-8578 Sendai University, Tohoku Physics, of Department 3–7 23 tal. et oiNasu Joji -a scatter- x-ray sjsie in justified is 25,26 , Dtd uut1,2018) 12, August (Dated: 19 nthe On where sof ns ∗ tion are- rre- een ec- nic tal be ce c- n ui Ishihara Sumio and re is r- h e e - - - - rsn omls oesvboi yaisi several in dynamics vibronic covers formalism Present E summary. ria xiainadteltiednmc,w nrdc a introduce we dynamics, lattice E the and excitation orbital ewe h ers-egbr(NN) nearest-neighbor the between pnigt h olcievboi oe.I e.VI resu VII, present Sec. the corre- In in modes modes. vibronic excitation collective low-energy the the to on sponding momen- focus and presented. we are energy VI, in excitations Sec. detailed vibronic part the the main of the where dependences V, The by tum Sec. IV. results is Sec. the paper with in this compared method are diagonalization theory exact present obta the results Befo by calculations, numerical spin-wav presented. detailed generalized is the a showing excitations III, vibronic Sec. for In approximation system. coupled lattice orb several models. to applicable weak coupled formalism is lattice from also present but systems couplings, degenerate The JT strong orbitally to cover interaction. only SE not cen- the does JT by single a modified in ter excitation Franck-Condon the ori a from multi-peaks nating interpreted high-energy and mode “orbiton”, vibronic co renormalized dispersive a modes low-energy excitation characteristic a a Two into exist; taken fully presented. ap are spin-wave is states generalized count vibronic A local the where vibration. coupli proach lattice JT on-site local model the the a interactions, up and SE set We the of footing. equal consists an which su- on the account into and orb taken between excitations are interaction vibronic inter-site local (SE)-type the perexchange both system; correlate degenerate tron orbitally in excitations vibronic of transitions. Franck-Condon the to ap due envelop broad a with excitations vibrational multi-peak olwn ria-atc ope Hamiltonian, coupled orbital-lattice following ipriemd n iheeg ut-ekmode. multi-peak high-energy and mode dispersive eeeaecreae ytm r xmnd We examined. are systems correlated degenerate ⊗ nodrt drs nisefrteculn ewe the between coupling the for issue an address to order In nSc I eitoueamdlHmloinfra orbital- an for Hamiltonian model a introduce we II, Sec. In framework theoretical a present to is paper this in Purpose ⊗ -odnecttosi igeJh-elrcen- Jahn-Teller single a in excitations k-Condon xiain n ueecag-yeitrst in- inter-site superexchange-type and excitations h pnwv prxmto oa otk local take to as so approximation spin-wave the e a osrn anTle opigmagnitudes. coupling Jahn-Teller strong to eak b Tcne tec atc ieadteS-yeinteractions SE-type the and site lattice each at center JT 1 ytm eto IIi eoe odsuso and discussion to devoted is VIII Section system. E ⊗ e ltdEeto System Electron elated ytmaecmae ihtoei the in those with compared are system H Japan , I MODEL II. = H J + H e JT g . rias eaotthe adopt We orbitals. elec- d ined pear itals ital- (1) gi- ng lts In re c- n e s - - 2

The first term, J , represents the SE interactions and the sec- III. FORMULATION ond term, ,H is forthe local lattice vibrationand the JT cou- HJT pling. One of the prototypical SE interaction in an orbitally We present a formulation based on the generalized spin- degenerate magnet is the Kugel-Khomskii type spin-orbital wave (SW) approximation, where the local vibronic states 29,30 Hamiltonian which is derived from the multi-orbital Hub- are fully taken into account. We show later that this is valid bard model. Here, we focus on the orbital degree of freedom from weak to strong JT coupling regimes. A relation of the in the SE-type interaction, and consider the following spin- present formalism to the random-phase approximation (RPA) less orbital-only model, is given in Appendix A. Similar formalisms were presented in z z x x Refs. 32–36. J = JzTi Tj + JxTi Tj , (2) H − We assume that Jz Jx in J and the uniform orbital hiji X order for T z in the ground≥ state,H without loss of generality. where NN ij sites are represented by ij . The doubly- The z component of the PS operator is decomposed into the degenerate orbitals are described by the pseudo-spinh i (PS) op- z z z ordered moment and fluctuation as Ti = T + δTi where 1 † h i ′ ′ erator defined by Ti = 2 γγ′ diγ σγγ diγ , where diγ is an denotes the expectation value in the ground state. The annihilation operator for a spin-less fermion with orbital γ at Hamiltonianh· · · i in Eq. (1) is rewritten as site i, and σ are the Pauli matrices.P The eigen state of T z with z z x x MF the eigen value of +1/2 ( 1/2) corresponds to a state where = (JzδT δT + JxT T )+ . (6) − H − i j i j Hi the d 2 2 (d 2 2 ) orbital is occupied by an electron. The hiji i 3z −r x −y X X exchange constants, Jz and Jx, are set to be positive. Present formulation is able to be generalized easily to models where We define the on-site term z x other terms for the PS interactions, such as , and the MF z JT Ti Tj = h T + , (7) spin degree of freedom, are taken into account. This will be Hi − MF i Hi discussed in Sec. VIII. with The second term of the Hamiltonian is given by z hMF = zJz T , (8) = JT, (3) h i HJT Hi i where z is a coordination number. X z with The ordered moment T is determined by the following h i MF 2 2 2 way. The local Hamiltonian i is diagonalized numerically JT 1 ∂ ∂ Mω0 2 2 z H = + + (Q + Q ) under a given T . The eigen states Φn and the eigen Hi −2M ∂Q2 ∂Q2 2 iu iv h i {| i} iu iv energies En are obtained up to ( n) where the phonon- z x { } N ≥ +2A( Ti Qiu + Ti Qiv), (4) number is restricted to be less than Nph at each site. In the − present numerical calculations, we chose , which is where Q and Q represent the two vibrational modes at Nph = 80 iu iv enough to examine excitations of the present interest. The or- the i-th JT center with the E symmetry. The first two g dered moment is calculated by the ground-state wave-function terms describe the harmonic vibrations with frequency ω0 and z z Φ0 as T = Φ0 T Φ0 . This procedure is repeated un- a reduced mass M, and the third term describes the linear | i z h i h | | i MF til T converges. It is noted that i commutes with the JT coupling with a coupling constant A(> 0). For conve- h i v† v H z iπbi bi nience, we introduce the phonon coordinates for lattice vi- parity operator i = 2Ti e , and the eigen states are P brations at as follows. The creation and annihila- classified by the eigen values of i, i.e. i Φn = pn Φn . A = 0 P P | i | i tion operators for the mode γ(= u, v) phonons are defined by When pn = 1 (pn = 1), a parity of Φn is identified as γ† γ “even” (“odd”). A parity− of the ground state| isi even. b = [ l0∂/(∂Qiγ)+ Qiγ /l0]/√2 and b = [l0∂/(∂Qγ)+ i − i By using the calculated eigen states, the PS operators are Q /l ]/√2 with l = (Mω )−1/2, respectively. Then, this iγ 0 0 0 expanded by the projection operators (X-operators) as term of the Hamiltonian is rewritten as JT = ω bγ†bγ gT z(bu† + bu)+ gT x(bv† + bv), N Hi 0 i i − i i i i i i x x mn γ Ti = (T )mnXi , (9) X m,n=0 (5) X and where the coupling constant is defined by g = √2Al0. We neglect the higher-order JT coupling, the anharmonic lattice po- N tential, and the cooperative JT effect, for simplicity, although z z mn δTi = (δT )mnXi , (10) the present formulation is generalized easily to include these m,n=0 effects (see Sec. VIII). X JT where Xmn = Φ Φ , (T x) = Φ T x Φ and It is worth noting that i is invariant under the simulta- i im in mn im i in H z | ihz | h | | i neous infinitesimal rotations of PS and Q = (Qu,Qv) given (δT )mn = Φim δTi Φin . By applying the generalized h | | i 32–36 by (T z,T x) (T z,T x)+ ε(T x, T z) and (Q ,Q ) Holstein-Primakoff transformation, the projection opera- i i → i i i − i iu iv → (Qiu,Qiv)+ ε( Qiv,Qiu) where ε is an infinitesimal con- tors are represented by the boson operators aim as stant. Therefore,− a gapless Goldstone mode31 exists in the Xmn = a† a , (11) case of Jx = Jz. i in im 3 for n,m 1, In the present formalism, the PS dynamical susceptibility is ≥ given by N 1/2 n0 † † ∞ Xi = a M a aim , (12) ll ˜l ˜l iωt−ǫt in − im χ (q,ω)= i dt 0 [T−q(t), Tq] 0 e m=1 ! − hh | | ii X Z0 ∞ Sll(q, E) for n 1, = dE , (18) ≥ −∞ ω E + iǫ N Z − X00 = M a† a , (13) where T˜l = (δT z,T x) for l = (z, x), ǫ is a positive infinites- i − in in q q q n=1 ˆ iHt ˆ −iHt X imal constant, and O(t) = e Oe is the Heisenberg 0n n0 † 00 representation for the operator Oˆ. The spectral function is and Xi = (Xi ) . A constraint M Xi + N † ≡ straightforwardly calculated as n=1 ainain =1 is imposed. The commutation relations for mn m′n′ mn′ the projection operators, [X ,X ] = δij (X δnm′ ll l l † P i j i S (q, E)= vmvn 0 (a−qm + aqm) q, η m′n − hh | | ii Xi δn′m), are derived by the constraint and commutation mnη † X relations for am and a . The SU(2) commutation relations † m q, η (aq + a ) 0 δ(E Ωq ), (19) for the PS operators are insured, when is taken to be infin- × hh | n −qn | ii − η 1N/2 ity. By the 1/M expansion up to (M ), we have where q, η α† 0 . The retarded Green’s functions for O | ii ≡ qη| ii N phonons are defined as x 1/2 x † T = M v (aim + a ), (14) ∞ i m im γ ˜γ ˜γ† iωt−ǫt m=1 D (q,ω)= i dt 0 [b (t), b ] 0 e , (20) X − hh | −q q | ii Z0 ˜γ ˜γ N where bq is a Fourier transform of bi , which is defined by z 1/2 z † γ u g z v δT = M v (aim + a ), (15) ˜ for . This is calculated i m im bi = (bi + ω0 Ti ,bi ) γ = (u, v) m=1 38 h i X by x x z z where vm = Φ0 T Φm and vm = Φ0 δT Φm . Dγ (q,ω)= D (ω)+ g2[D (ω)]2χll(q,ω), (21) Then, the Hamiltonianh | | i is given ash a bilinear| | formi for the 0 0 boson operators as where l = z(x) for γ = u(v), and D0(ω)=1/(ω ω0 + iǫ) is the bare phonon Green’s function. − (even) z z † = (∆E δ zγqJ v v )a aq H n mn − z m n qm n q m,n IV. COMPARISON WITH EXACT DIAGONALIZATION X X zγ J METHOD q z vz vz (a† a† + h.c) − 2 m n qm −qn (odd) Before showing detailed results, we compare the numerical x x † + (∆E δ zγqJ v v )a aq results obtained by the present method and the exact diagonal- n mn − x m n qm n q m,n ization (ED) method in finite cluster systems, to show validity X X of the present method. In order to avoid finite size effects in zγqJx † x x † z vmvn(aqma−qn + h.c) , (16) the ED method, we add an external-field term, , to − 2 h i Ti the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1), by which the excitation− becomes where ∆En = En E0, aqn is the Fourier transform of ain, gapful. In the ED method, Hamiltonian in Eq. (1)P plus the −1 −iq·ρ and γq = z ρ e is a form factor where summations external-field term is solved by the Lanczos method, and one- (even (odd)) dimensional clusters with a periodic boundary condition are are taken for theP NN sites. A symbol m,n represents a summation for the even (odd) parity states. This originates adopted, for simplicity. The parameter values are chosen to x z P be Jz = 0, Jx/ω0 = 0.2, and h/ω0 = 1. The Hilbert space from vn = 0 (vn = 0) for the even (odd) parity states due to the relations T z = T z and T x = T x. The Hamilto- is restricted so that the number of the phonons is less than 16 nian in Eq. (16)P isP diagonalizedP by theP generalizedBogoliub− ov at each site. transformation37 as In Fig. 1, the PS dynamical susceptibilities calculated by the two methods are compared with each other. We focus † = Ωq α αq + const., (17) on low energy excitations up to ω/ω0 = 1.5, correspond- H η qη η q η ing to the upper band edge of the collective vibronic excita- X X tion, as explained later. It is shown that excitation energies where αqη is a boson operator given by a linear combination Ωqη calculated by Eq. (17) well reproduce dominant peaks † xx of sets of aqm and a−qm , and Ωqη is the eigen energy. in ( 1/π)Imχ (q,ω) calculated by the ED method. Good The ground{ state} of ,{ termed} 0 , is defined as a vacuum of agreements− between the two results are seen from the no- H | ii αqη for any q and η. coupling case (g =0) to the strong coupling case (g/ω0 =3). 4

1.5 (a) (b) 0.3 1 0.25

0.5 0.2 0.15 0 0.1 -0.5 0.05 -1 1.5 0 (c) (d) 1 0.1 0.08 0.5 0.06 0 0.04 -0.5 0.02

-1 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 0.07 Present method 0.06 L=2 0.05 L=3 Exact diagnalization method 0.04 L=4 0.03 0.02 0.01 FIG. 1: (Color online) Orbital excitation spectra calculated by the 0 present generalized spin-wave method and the ED method. Red lines 0.06 xx 0.05 are for the poles of Imχ (q,ω), i.e. Ωqη defined in Eq. (17). Blue lines represent (−1/π)Imχxx(q,ω) calculated by the ED method. 0.04 0.03 An external field term is added to the Hamiltonian in Eq. (1). In 0.02 the ED method, cluster size is chosen to be L = 2, 3 and 4, and an 0.01 infinitesimal constant as a damping factor of the spectra is chosen 0 to be ǫ/ω0 = 0.01. Parameter values are chosen to be Jz = 0, 0 5 10 15 20 Jx/ω0 = 0.2, and h/ω0 = 1.

0.5 FIG. 3: (Color online) Imaginary parts of the dynamical susceptibilities for several g/ω0. Red and blue lines represent −1 xx 0.45 spectral weights at poles of (−1/π)N Pq Imχ (q,ω) and −1 zz (−1/π)N Pq Imχ (q,ω), respectively. Parameter values are 0.4 chosen to be Jz/ω0 = 1 and z = 2.

0.35

0.3 large g, a reduction of M0 from 1/2 decreases with g, since the kinetic energy of the lattice vibration is proportional to 0.25 2 1/g [see the first term in Eq. (30)]. A Jz dependence of M0 implies a competition between the vibroic motion and the 0.2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 inter-site SE interaction; a large SE interaction suppresses a reduction of the ordered moment due to the vibroic motion. Local vibronic excitation spectra, defined by z FIG. 2: (Color online) Ordered moment M0 = hT i for several −1 ll (πN) q Imχ (q,ω), are presented in Fig. 3. Here, Jz/ω0. A coordination number is chosen to be z = 2. N− represents the number of the lattice sites. At g = 0, a P single peak appears at ω = ω0 in the xx-component and no finite intensity in the zz-component. In finite g, two-kind V. ORBITAL-LATTICE COUPLED VIBRONIC excitations appear; a sharp low-energy peak at a little below EXCITATIONS ω0 and high-energy multi-peaks with a Gaussian-like enve- 2 lope. A center of the envelope is located around g /ω0 + Jz. A. Local Vibronic Excitation A low energy peak is attributed to the collective vibronic excitation mode of our main interest, and will be examined MF We start from the results in the local Hamiltonian i de- in more detail in Sec. VI. High-energy multi-peaks are fined in Eq. (7). The results where the inter-site interactioH n attributed to the Frank-Condon excitations from the lower effects are taken into account are presented in the next sub- adiabatic-potential plane to the higher plane27,28 A center 2 section. of the multi-peak structure is located around g /ω0 + Jz, z First, we show the orbital ordered moment M0 T as a i.e. a sum of a separation between the higher and lower function of the JT coupling constant in Fig. 2. Non-monotoni≡ h i c adiabatic-potentials and a diagonal component of the SE behaviors as functions of g are shown. For small g, a reduction interaction energy. Schematic pictures for the adiabatic of M0 with increasing g reflects a suppression of the long- potential planes and transitions in the Qu-Qv plane are shown range order due to the vibronic motion. On the other hand, for in Fig. 4(a). 5

(a) xx component (b) zz component (a) (b) 20 20

15 15

10 10

5 5

0 0 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1

7 (c) FIG. 4: (Color online) (a) Adiabatic-potential planes in the E ⊗ e 6 system, and (b) those in the E ⊗ b1 system. Red and blue arrows 5 represent excitation between the two adiabatic-potential planes and 4 that in the lowest adiabatic-potential plane. 3 2

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6

FIG. 6: (Color online) Momentum dependences of the ﬁrst moment l l (ω¯q) and a square of the second moment (∆ωq) for the high energy multi-peaks. (a) and (b) are for the xx- and zz-components, respec- l l l tively. Bold and dotted lines represent ω¯q and ω¯q ± ∆ωq, respectively. Parameter values are chosen to be (J/ω0,g/ω0) = (5, 3). l (c) Square roots of the second moment (∆ωq) at q = 0 of the high energy multi-peaks as functions of the JT coupling. We chose J/ω0 = 5.

Figs. 5(b) and (d)]. Let us focus on the high-energy multi-peak structure. As seen in Figs. 5(c) and (d), spectral distributions show dispersive features for large J. Centers of the multi-peak struc- 2 tures are located around g /ω0 + J. To clarify nature of the dispersion, we calculate the first and second moments FIG. 5: (Color online) Contour maps of imaginary parts of l for the high-energy multi-peaks defined by ω¯q = ω lq and the dynamical susceptibilities. Colors represent spectral weights l 2 2 1/2 h i xx ∆ω = [ ω q ω ] , respectively, where we define (−1/π)Imχ (q,ω). Parameter values are chosen to be (a) q h il − h ilq (J/ω0,g/ω0) = (1, 0), (b) (1, 3), (c) (5, 2), and (d) (5, 3). An ∞ dωImχll(q,ω)f(ω) infinitesimal constant as a damping factor of the spectra is chosen to ωc f(ω) lq = , (22) be ǫ/ω0 = 0.1. h i ∞ dωImχll(q,ω) R ωc R for a function f(ω) and a cut-off energy ωc is chosen to be B. Inter-site Interaction Effect ω0. Figures 6(a) and (b) show the momentum dependences of ω¯l , and ω¯l ∆ωl for l = x and z, respectively. Dispersion q q ± q Numerical results for the Hamiltonian = JT + J in the xx-component is larger than that in the zz-component. are presented. For simplicity, a one-dimensionalH H lattice aHnd As shown in Eq. (16), the dispersion is almost governed x x isotropic exchange interactions, J Jz = Jx, are assumed. by the transverse PS fluctuation, vm = Φ0 T Φm , for ≡ h | | iz Results for other lattice structures and anisotropic interactions the xx component, and the longitudinal fluctuation, vm = z are easily obtained by changing a form factor γq in Eq. (16). Φ0 δT Φm , for the zz component. It is also shown that h l| | i We present in Fig. 5 imaginary parts of the dynamical PS ∆ωq is almost proportional to g, as seen in Fig. 6(c), where l susceptibilities for several J and g. At g = 0 [see Fig. 5(a)], ∆ωq are plotted as functions of the JT coupling. a gapless and dispersive low-energy mode exists. This corre- The imaginary parts of the phonon Green’s functions are sponds to the sharp low-energy peak in Fig. 3(a), and a purely shown in Fig. 7 for several J and g. A flat dispersion at g =0 electronic “orbiton” excitation. By introducing a finite g as is changed into the gapless dispersive mode by introducing a shown in Fig. 5(b), the high energy multi-peak structure ap- finite g. The low energymode is identified as a strongly mixed pears, as mentioned in the previous subsection, and the low vibronic excitation of orbital and phonon. Spectral intensity energy mode remains to be dispersive and gapless. The band is weak in the high energy region above ω0, where intensive width of the low energy mode decreases with increasing g multi-peak structures appear in the orbital channel as shown [see Figs. 5(a) and (b)], and increases with increasing J [see in Fig. 5. 6

FIG. 7: (Color online) Contour maps of imaginary parts of FIG. 8: (Color online) Energy dispersions calculated in the weak the phonon Green’s function. Colors represent spectral weights coupling approach and contour maps of the imaginary parts of (−1/π)ImDv(q,ω). Parameter values are chosen to be (a) WC the PS dynamical susceptibilities. Green lines represent Ωqη (J/ω0,g/ω0) = (1, 0), (b) (1, 3), (c) (5, 2), and (d) (5, 3). An defined in Eq. (24), and colors maps represent spectral weights infinitesimal constant as a damping factor of the spectra is chosen to (−1/π)Imχxx(q,ω). Parameter values are chosen to be (a) be ǫ/ω0 = 0.1. (J/ω0,g/ω0) = (1, 0), (b) (1, 0.1), (c) (1, 0.2), and (d) (1, 0.3). An infinitesimal constant as a damping factor of the spectra is chosen to be ǫ/ω0 = 0.1. VI. LOW-ENERGY VIBRONIC EXCITATION

η ˜u† u† In this section, we focus on the low-energy vibronic mode. of bi , and bq = bq + δq=0√2NgS/ω0. We deﬁne ξq = 2 zSJz zSJxγq/2+ g S/ω0 and ζq = zSJxγq/2, and omit constant− terms. A. Weak Coupling Case By neglectingthe fourthline in Eq. (23), which is the higher order in the 1/S expansion, the bilinear form is diagonalized We assume a small JT coupling, i.e. g ω ,J, and present by using the Bogoliubov transformation as ≪ 0 a weak coupling formalism based on the perturbational ap- WC WC † = Ω β βq , (24) proach. The results are compared with the ones obtained in H qη qη η Sec. VB and discrepancies between the two are discussed. q,ηX=(u,±) We start from the free phonons and orbitons, and intro- where βqη is the boson operator. The eigen energies are ana- duce the coupling between them. A uniform orbital ordered lytically obtained as state for T z is assumed in the ground state. By applying WC the Holstein-Primakoff transformation to the PS operators, Ωqu = ω0, (25) we have T z = S bo†bo and T x S/2(bo† + bo) with i − i i i ≈ i i and S =1/2, where bo and bo† are the boson operators for “pure” i i p electronic orbiton. Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) is rewritten as ΩWC = ω2 + ξ2 ζ2 q± 0 q − q WC ˜u†˜u v† v h 1/2 = ω0 bq bq + bq bq 2 2 2 2 2 (ω0 ξq + ζq ) +8g ω0S(ξq ζq) . (26) H q ± − − X q i 1 The u-phonon does not mix with orbiton in this approxima- + ξ bo†bo + ζ (bo†bo† + h.c.) q q q 2 k q −q tion. q WC X In Fig. 8, the calculated energy dispersions Ωq± are com- xx S o† v† o† v pared with ( 1/π)Imχ (q,ω) obtained by the method given + g (b b + b b + h.c.) − xx 2 q −q q q in Sec. III. Poles of ( 1/π)Imχ (q,ω) are almost repro- r q duced by the weak-coupling− results of ΩWC, which are repre- g X q± + (bo†bo ˜bu + h.c.), (23) sented as an anti-crossing between the dispersive orbiton and √ k k+q q N k,q the dispersion-less v phonon. At g = 0, results obtained by X the two methods perfectly coincide with each other. Discrep- η where bq for η = (u,v,o) are the Fourier transformations ancies between the two become remarkable with increasing 7 g. In particular, the gapless dispersion, required by the Gold- stone’s theorem, is not reproduced by the weak-coupling approach, in contrast to the method in Secs. III. This is due to the fact that, in the weak coupling approach, the two interaction terms between orbiton and phonon in Eq. (5) are not treated on as equal footing: the interaction between T z and the u-phonon is fully considered, but only the lowest order terms of the 1/S expansion for the interaction between T x and the v-phonon are taken into account. A similar treatment was adopted in Ref. 24, where the spin wave approximation is applied to Eq. (5) and the fourth line in Eq. (23) is treated by FIG. 9: (Color online) (a) Contour map of imaginary part of the dy- the self-consistent Born approximation. On the other hand, in namical susceptibilities, and (b) that calculated in the strong coupling the present method given in Sec III, the rotational symmetry approach. Colors represent spectral weights (−1/π)Imχxx(q,ω). in the T and Q spaces are maintained, and as a result, the gap- Parameter values are chosen to be (J/ω0,g/ω0) = (1, 4). An in- less mode expected from the Goldstone’s theorem appears. ﬁnitesimal constant as a damping factor of the spectra is chosen to be ǫ/ω0 = 0.1.

B. Strong Coupling Case In order to examine the low-energy vibronic excitation, we assume that the zero-point vibration energy (ω0/2) is much In this subsection, we assume g ω0, and derive the effective Hamiltonian for the low-energy≫ vibronic state. Calculated smaller than the JT energy gain (EJT), and the vibronic mo- results are compared with the results in Sec. VB. tion is confined on the lower adiabatic-potential plane. The effective Hamiltonian for the vibronic motion on this plane is given by 1. Low-energy effective Hamiltonian 1 ∂2 ∂2 r r Q ∗ d ψ−( , ) 2 + 2 −2M ∂Qu ∂Qv We focus on the vibronic motion around the potential min- Z h (−) ima in the lower-adiabatic potential [see Fig. 4(a)], and derive + U (Q) ψ−(r, Q) the low-energy effective model from MF in the strong cou- Hi 2 2 i pling limit by following Ref. 39. In this limit, the conical 1 1 ∂ Mω0 2 = + (ρ ρ0) EJT √ρ intersection point shown in Fig. 4 is irrelevant, and the Born- √ρ −2M ∂ρ2 2 − − Oppenheimer approximation is valid. The vibronic wave- h 2 i 1 ∂ hMF hMF function is given by Φ (r, Q) = ψ (r, Q)φk (Q), where cos θ cos θ + (h2 ). nk k n − 2Mρ2 ∂θ2 − 2 − 8AMρ3 O MF ψ (r, Q) and φk (Q) are the electronic and lattice wave func- k n (29) tions, respectively, and r and Q are the electron and lattice coordinates, respectively. The adiabatic potentials for MF Hi The first and second lines of the right hand side in Eq. (29) are given as represent the radial mode and the rotational mode, respec- 2 2 tively. Since the characteristic energy for the radial mode, (k=±) Mω0ρ 1 2 U (Q)= Aρ hMF cos θ, (27) ω0, is larger than that for the rotational mode, 1/(2Mρ0) = 2 ± ± 2 3 2 ω0/g , we focus on the latter at ρ = ρ0. Then the effective 2 2 −1 Hamiltonian at a single site for the strong coupling limit is where ρ = Qu + Qv and θ = tan (Qv/Qu). We assume 2 2 2 given as that hMF EJT A /(2Mω0) = g /(4ω0) where EJT is energy gain≪p due to≡ the JT effect. The electronic wave function ω3 d2 1 on the lower adiabatic-potential plane up to the order SC 0 (30) (k = ) i = 2 2 hMF cos θi. of (h ) is given as − H − g dθi − 2 O MF where the last two terms in Eq. (29) is neglected, since θ hMF 2 θ 3 −1 4 4 ψ−(r, Q)= ψ3z2−r2 (r)cos 1+ sin hMF(8AMρ0) = hMFω0/(2g ) is much smaller than the 2 2Aρ 2 3 2 kinetic energy ω0/g for rotational mode in the strong cou- θ hMF 2 θ pling case. ψ 2 2 (r) sin 1 cos . (28) − x −y 2 − 2Aρ 2 The Schrödinger equation for the rotational mode, SC − − φn (θ)= Enφn (θ), is solved numerically under the anti- (−) H In the case of hMF = 0, U takes its minima at ρ = periodic boundary condition, φn(θ +2π)= φn(θ), required 2 − ρ0 A/(Mω0) for any θ [see Fig. 4(a)]. In a positive finite from the condition that Φnk(r, Q) is single valued. The cor- ≡ (−) hMF, this degeneracy is lifted, and U takes its minimum at responding vibronic wave function is given by Φn−(r,θ) = − θ = 0. The energy difference between the lower and higher ψ−(r,θ)φn (θ), and the dynamical orbital susceptibilities are MF adiabatic planes at ρ = ρ0 in the case of hMF =0 is denoted calculated by the method presented in Sec. III, where i in by 2Aρ g2/ω =4E . Eq. (6) is replaced by SC in Eq. (30). Results are presentedH 0 ≡ 0 JT Hi 8

2. Band width of low-energy collective mode

We focus on the band width of the low-energy excitation mode. As shown in Fig. 5, the band width strongly depends on the JT coupling g [see Figs. 5(a) and (b)], as well as the exchange constant J [see Figs. 5(b) and (d)]. Detailed analyses are given in Figs. 11(a) and (b), where the band width deﬁned by W Ω , where η indicates the lowest branch, are FIG. 10: (Color online) A schematic picture for the collective vi- ≡ q=π,η0 0 bronic mode. Upper panel shows adiabatic-potential planes in a lat- plotted as a function of g and J, respectively. The band width tice where arrows represent directions of a vector Q. Lower panel is renormalized as 1/g for large J and g, and is almost inde- represents a schematic vibronic state. pendent of g for small J and g. As for the J dependence, W is almost proportional to J for small J and is proportional to √J for large J. These results are interpreted from the Hamiltonian in Eq. (30) by the perturbational schemes as follows. Since the 0.4 1 band width, i.e. the excitation energy at the zone bound- 0.35 ary, corresponds to the orbital excitation energy at a single

0.3 0.1 site under the mean-ﬁeld. This is equivalent to the energy difference ∆ between the ground state and the ﬁrst excited 0.25 state in SC. In the weak SE interaction or the weak JT 0.01 i 0.2 4 8 16 H 3 2 coupling [hMF( J) 2ω0/g ], where the second term SC ∼ ≪ 0.15 in i is treated as a perturbational term, we have ∆ = H z z hMF( Φu T Φu Φv T Φv )= hMF/2, where Φu and 0.1 h | | i − h | | i | i Φv are the degenerate ground states in the case of hMF =0. 0.05 |A factori 1/2 originates from reductions of the matrix ele- z z 0 ments, Φu T Φu = Φv T Φv = 1/4, known as the 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Ham’s reductionh | | effect.i 40−hThis| result| i explains that W is proportional to J and is almost independent of g. On the other 0.4 side, in the strong SE interaction or the strong JT coupling 3 2 0.35 [hMF( J) 2ω0/g ], a deep potential minimum exists at θ =0,∼ and the≫ Hamiltonian in Eq. (30) is expanded by θ as 0.3 3 2 0.25 SC ω0 d hMF 2 hMF 4 1 (31) = 2 2 + θ θ , 0.2 H − g dθ 4 − 48

0.15 0.1 where the constant terms are omitted. By taking the last term 3/2 3 2 0.1 as a perturbation, we have ∆ = √hMFω0 /g ω0/(4g ), 0.01 − 0.05 which explains that W is proportional to √J and 1/g. 0.01 0.1 1 0 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 VII. COMPARISON BETWEEN THE E ⊗ e AND E ⊗ b1 SYSTEMS FIG. 11: (Color online) (a) Band widths of the low energy mode as functions of the JT coupling g. Inset shows a logarithmic plot. (b) To clarify characteristics of the low-energy vibronic excita- Band width of the low energy mode as a function of the exchange tion in the E e JT system, we introduce a system where the ⊗ constant J. Inset shows a logarithmic plot. A parameter value is doubly degenerate eg orbitals couple to a non-degenerate vi- chosen to be g/ω0 = 5. brational mode, and compare the two results. The interaction between the orbital and phonon in this system is given by

E⊗b1 = ω bu†bu gT z(bu† + bu), (32) Hi 0 i i − i i i where one phonon mode couples to the electronic orbital. A in Fig. 9, together with the results obtained in Sec. V B. Two similar Hamiltonian was studied in Ref. 41. We analyze the JT E⊗b1 results almost coincide with each other. This fact implies that Hamiltonian in Eq. (7), where i is replaced by i , by the low-energy excitation mode is identiﬁed as the collective using the method presented in Sec.H III. A uniformorbitalH order vibronic mode where the local rotational mode on the lower for T z is assumed in the ground state. adiabatic-potential plane propagates through the inter-site SE The imaginary parts of the dynamical susceptibility interactions. A schematic picture for the collective mode is ( 1/π)Imχxx(q,ω) are presented in Fig. 12. Momentum de- shown in Fig. 10. pendent− high-energy multi-peaks appear and a center of the 9

FIG. 12: (Color online) Contour maps of imaginary parts of the dynamical susceptibilities in the E ⊗ b1 system. Colors represent spectral weights (−1/π)Imχxx(q,ω). Parameter values are chosen to be (a) (J/ω0,g/ω0) = (1, 3) and (b) (5, 3). An inﬁnitesimal constant FIG. 14: (Color online) Energy dispersions of the low-energy mode as a damping factor of the spectra is chosen to be ǫ/ω0 = 0.1. for several anharmonic lattice potentials (B). Parameter values are chosen to be (J/ω0,g/ω0)=(1, 4). 10

is in contrast qualitatively to the E e system where the 1 adiabatic-potential planes are deﬁned⊗ in the two-dimensional Qu-Qv plane. There is a continuous degeneracy for the poten- 0.1 tial minima in the lower adiabatic-potential plane, as shown in Fig. 4(a), and the Bloch-wave type vibration wave-function are extended along the potential minima. As a result, the gap-

Spectral weight Spectral 0.01 less low-energy vibronic excitation exists even in the strong coupling regime.

0.001 -1 -0.8 -0.6 -0.4 -0.2 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 VIII. DISCUSSION AND SUMMARY

FIG. 13: (Color online) Momentum dependences of the spectral In this section, we discuss effects of several factors which xx weights −(1/π)Imχ (q,ω) at ω = Ωqη0 . Red line with filled cir- are neglected so far: the anharmonic lattice potential, the co- cles is for the E ⊗ e system and blue line with open circles is for the operative lattice effect, the anisotropic exchange interactions, E ⊗ b1 system. Parameter values are chosen to be (J/ω0,g/ω0) = and the spin degree of freedom, all of which are able to be (1, 3). introduced in the present formalisms. First, we show effects of the anharmonic lattice potential. This is known to play key roles on orbital orders in real ma- 2 multi-peaks is located around g /ω0 + J. These character- terials. The anharmonic lattice potential is treated within the istics are similar to the high-energy excitations in the E e strong coupling approach presented in Sect. VIB. The local ⊗ JT system presented in Sec. VB and are attributed to the ex- Hamiltonian corresponding to Eq. (30) is given by citations from the lower to higher adiabatic-potential planes. On the other hand, intensity of the low energy mode is much ω3 d2 1 AH = 0 h cos θ B cos3θ , (33) weaker than that in the E e system shown in Fig. 5. De- i 2 2 MF i i H − g dθi − 2 − tailed comparison for the low⊗ energy mode is shown in Fig. 13 where the momentum dependences of the spectral weight where the third term represents the anharmonic lattice poten- (1/π)Imχxx(q,ω) at poles are presented. Spectral inten- tial with a positive constant B. This term stabilizes the JT − q sities in the E b1 system are almost one order smaller than distortions at θ = 0 and 2π/3. The Schrödinger equation ⊗ AH ± those in the E e system. for i is solved numerically, and the dynamical PS suscep- ⊗ H MF This difference is attributed to a dimensionality in the tibilities are calculated by the method in Sec. III, where i lattice-coordination space. In the E b system, the adia- in Eq. (6) is replaced by AH. Results of the dispersionH rela- ⊗ 1 Hi batic potential is defined in the one-dimensional Qu coordi- tion of the low-energy collective excitations are presented in nate and shows a double-well type potential where minima Fig. 14. The excitation gap opens by introducing finite B, be- exist at two discrete values, as shown in Fig. 4(b). The exci- cause the rotational symmetry in the lower adiabatic-potential tation inside the lower-adiabatic plane is an Ising-type. With plane is broken by the anharmonic potential. increasing g, distance between the coordinates where the po- An excitation energy gap is also opened by the anisotropic tential takes the minima increases, and an overlap between the SE interactions. So far, we assume Jx = Jz which ensures the wave-functions at two minima is reduced. As a result, ampli- continuous symmetry in the T and Q spaces. In realistic ma- tude in the low-energy excitation mode is weakened. This terials, however, the SE interactions are anisotropic; J = J , x 6 z 10

x z x x and Ti Tj as well as Ti + Tj terms exist. The anisotropic SE interactions are able to be dealt with in the present formalism. We demonstrate this application in a Kugel-Khomskii 21,29,30 type Hamiltonian where the doubly degenerate eg orbitals are introduced at each site in a simple cubic lattice. The Hamiltonian is given by22

1 1 = 2J + S S τ µτ µ HKK − 1 4 i · j 4 − i j hXijiµ 1 3 2J S S + τ µτ µ + τ µ + τ µ , − 2 4 − i · j 4 i j i j hXijiµ (34)

µ where J1 and J2 are the exchange constants, τi is the µ bond-dependent pseudo-spin operator defined by τi = z x FIG. 15: (Color online) Imaginary parts of the PS susceptibilities cos(2πnµ/3)T sin(2πnµ/3)T with (nz,nx,ny) = i − i at (a) g/ω0 = 0, (b) 1, and (c) 2. (d) shows an expansion of (0, 1, 2), a subscript µ(= x,y,z) indicates a direction of the the low-energy region of (c). Parameter values are chosen to be ij bond, and Si is the spin operator. This model has been stud- (J1/ω0, J2/ω0) = (1, 0.5). An infinitesimal constant as a damp- ied for the orbital structures and excitations in LaMnO3 and ing factor of the spectra is chosen to be ǫ/ω0 = 0.05 in (a)-(c) and 22 KCuF3. We focus on the orbital dynamics and neglect spin 0.01 in (d). excitation, which will be discussed later. We apply the present method given in Sec. III, where J is replaced by KK with above approximation. The PS dynamicalH susceptibilityH is de- by fined by = (J δT zδT z + J T xT x) (36) H − z i j x i j ∞ hiji ll′ ˜l ˜l′ iωt−ǫt X χΛΛ′ (q,ω)= i dt 0 [T−qΛ(t), TqΛ′ ] 0 e , MF − hh | | ii + Kll′ δQilδQjl′ + . (37) Z0 Hi (35) i hijXilm X The on-site term for l = z, x, where Λ(= A,B,C,D) describes MF z JT the four orbital sublattices. Figures 15(a)-(d) show i = hMFTi + hQQiu + i , (38) ( 1/π)Imχxx (q,ω). At g =0 [see Fig. 15(a)], the pure “or- H − H − AA biton” shows gapful excitation around J due to the anisotropic where hQ is a mean-field acting on Qiu, is diagonalized, as 22 exchange interactions. Four modes are attributed to the four explained in Sec. III. Both hQ and hMF are calculated self- sublattices. By introducing the JT coupling g [see Fig. 15(b) consistently, and δQil is represented by the boson operators, and (c)], the pure orbiton modes are changed into the low- † aim and aim, in a similar way to Eq. (14). Then, the effects energy modes and the high-energy multi-peaks. It is worth of CJT are taken into account on an equal footing to the SE noting that, even in the strong coupling cases, characteristic interaction. dispersion relations, which are similar to the pure orbiton ex- We touch briefly the spin degree of freedom. As shown in citations, appear in the low-energy collective mode, as shown the Kugel-Khomskii type model in Eq. (34), the NN interac- in Fig. 15(d). This dispersive low energy modes is interpreted tions are expressed by products of the spin part and the orbital as a vibronic collective modes where intensity and energy are part. This interactions can be treated in the same way of J strongly renormalized. in Eq. (6) as follow. The SE Hamiltonian are representedH by The cooperative JT (CJT) effect, neglected so far, plays a sum of the spin interactions, the orbital interactions and the sometime essential roles on the orbital order as well as the spin-orbital interactions. The MF decouplings are applied to excitation dispersions.26,42 This interaction is attributed to the each term such as Si Sj Si Sj + Si Sj Si Sj , l m l m · l→ m ·h li hm i· l −h i·hm i interaction between the lattice displacement in different JT Ti Tj Ti Tj + Ti Tj Ti Tj , Ti Si SjTj l → hm i hl i − hm ih li · m → centers, and is able to be treated in the same way with the Ti Si Sj Tj + Ti Si Sj Tj Ti Si Sj Tj and · h i h i · − hMF i · h i inter-site SE interaction in the present formalism. Let us so on. Then, the local Hamiltonian i corresponding to consider, for an example, a simple model for the interaction Eq. (6) is numerically solved in the spin,H orbital and phonon between the NN JT centers as hijill′ Kll′ QilQjl′ with the Hilbert spaces. Three-kinds of the boson operators are re- spring constants K ′ . The MF decoupling is introduced as quired to be introduced: orbiton, magnon and orbiton-magnon ll P QilQjl′ = Qil Qjl′ + Qil Qjl′ Qil Qjl′ + δQilδQjl′ , which changes spin and orbital states at the same site, si- where δQ = hQ i Qh . Hamiltoniani − h ih in Eq.i (6) is replaced multaneously.18,43,44 The bilinear boson Hamiltonian obtained il il − h ili 11 by the generalized spin-wave approximation is diagonalized Acknowledgments by the Bogoliubov transformation, and the diagonal Hamil- tonian such as Eq. (17) is obtained. It is expected that, in a One of the authors (JN) thanks S. Yamazaki and Y. Yamaji collinear spin ordered state as a ground state, finite mixings for helpful discussions. This work was supported by KAK- occur between magnon and orbiton-magnon, and between or- ENHI from MEXT and Tohoku University “Evolution” pro- biton and phonon due to the conservation of the spin angular gram. JN is supported by the global COE program “Weaving momentum. In a non-collinear spin ordered state, four kind Science Web beyond Particle-Matter Hierarchy” of MEXT, excitations are mixed with each other, and the JT effect af- Japan. Parts of the numerical calculations are performed in fect the spin dynamics directly. The present method is also the supercomputing systems in ISSP, the University of Tokyo. valid for systems where the relativistic spin-orbit interaction is relevant. Intra-atomic magnetic structures with the spin- orbit interaction are able to be taken into account in the simi- Appendix A: Relation to Random Phase Approximation lar way to the JT coupling. The calculated spin-orbital mixed excitations due to the spin-orbit interactions will be compared In this Appendix, we derive another expression, a RPA-type with experimental observations in the 4d and 5d transition- expression, for the dynamical PS susceptibility which is given metal compounds, such as iridium oxides, as well as the 3d in Eqs. (18) and(19). Since both of the expressionsin Eq. (18) transition-metal oxides. with Eq. (19), and Eq. (A11) are derivedfromthe same Hamil- tonian without any approximations, the two expressions are equivalent. Finally, we discuss vibronic excitations from the view point We start from where is defined in of experimental observations. Present calculations, for exam- = J + JT JT Eq. (4), and assumeH a generalH formH for the SEH interactions as ple the results in Fig. 15, are directly applicable to the excitation dynamics in the several eg orbital ordered systems, e.g. l l′ = J ′ T T , (A1) LaMnO , KCuF and others. Detailed calculations for each J ll i j 3 3 H − ′ material will be presented in future works. Here, we suggest Xhiji llX=x,z that experimental observations rather depend on magnitudes l l′ where J ′ represent the SE interactions between T and T . of the JT coupling. In a weak JT coupling regime, dispersive ll i j We assume the uniform orbital order of T in the mean-field excitations, being similar to the pure electronic orbitons, are z ground state of the Hamiltonian . Hamiltonianh i correspond- expected. Weak multiple structures due to the JT coupling ing to Eq. (6) is given by H will appear in the orbiton bands. The excitation energy is characterized by the SE interactions which are of the order of l l′ MF = J ′ T˜ T˜ + , (A2) 10-100meV in typical transition-metal compounds. Such vi- H − ll i j Hi ′ i bronic excitations can be detected by the resonant x-ray scat- hXijill X tering experiments. On the other hand, in a strong JT cou- with pling regime, excitation energies of the dispersive branches MF z JT are renormalized and shift to lower than the bare JT pho- = hMFT + . (A3) Hi − i Hi non frequency. This is the energy range for the optical spec- troscopy measurements. The recently developed non-resonant We define T˜z = T z T z , and T˜x = T x. By introduc- i i − h i i i inelastic x-ray scattering technique is applicable to detect the ing the generalized Holstein-Primakoff transformation in the dispersions of the renormalized vibronic modes. The inelas- same way with Eqs. (14) and (15), Hamiltonian is written by tic neutron scattering, which directly accesses to the phonon the boson operators as channel [see Fig. 7], is another candidate to detect the dis- l l′ † = (∆E δ zγq J ′ v v )a aq persive collective vibronic excitations. In the strong coupling H n mn − ll m n qm n regime, observation of the characteristic momentum depen- q mn ll′ X X X dent intensities/energies of the high-energy multi-peak struc- zγq l l′ † † J ′ v v (a a + h.c) , (A4) − 2 ll m n qm −qn tures also provides several information for orbital excitation ll′ and JT coupling. X where definitions of the symbols are the same as those in Eq. (16). In conclusion, we present a theoretical framework of vi- We consider the propagator for the boson operator as bronic excitations where both the local vibronic excitations and the inter-site orbital interaction are taken into account on Pmn(q, τ)= Tτ φ−qm(τ)φqn , (A5) −h i an equal footing. We confirm that the present formalism is † valid from the weak to strong coupling regimes. Two kinds of where φqn = aqn + a−qn. For convenience, we present the excitations are identified; the low-energy collective vibronic Matsubara formalism in finite temperature. The Fourier trans- mode connected to orbiton, and the high-energy multi-peaks formation of the propagator is given by originating from the single JT center. The present formalism β iωpτ is applicable to a wide range of correlated electron models Pmn(q,iωp)= dτPmn(q, τ)e , (A6) with the orbital degrees of freedom. Z0 12

2 where Tτ is the time-ordering operator, ωp is the Mat- with [Pˆ0(iωp)]mn = δmn (iωp) /(2∆En) ∆En/2 . The subara frequency, represents the thermal average and susceptibility is obtained as{ − } (τ) = eτH e−τh·H ·. · i The orbital susceptibility is given as O ′ O ′ χll (q,iω )= vl vl P (q,iω ). p mn m n mn p −1 The equation of motion of the propagator is obtained by ′ ′ ′ ll ˆ−1 ˆ k k ˆ l l P χ (q,iωp) = Tr P0 + zγq Jkk′ M M ,  ′ !  iωpPmn = ∆EmQmn, (A7) Xkk  −1  where ll′ kk′ = Tr χˆ 1+ zγq J ′ χˆ ,  loc kk loc  β kk′ ! iωpτ X Q (q,iω )= dτ T π q (τ)φq e , (A8) mn p − h τ − m ni   (A11) Z0 † with π = a a and ∆E = E E . The equation ′ ′ qn qn −qn m m 0 where ll ˆ ˆ l l. Finally, we have a RPA-type expres- of motion of the− propagator Q is also obtained− as χˆloc = P0M mn sion as

iωpQmn =2δmn + ∆EmPmn ˆ l′l ˆ ll′ −1 2zγq Jll′ (M P )mn. (A9) χ (q,iωp)= χ¯loc(iωp) 1+ J¯(q)¯χloc(iωp) , − ll′ ll′ X h i (A12) ′ ′ We deﬁne Mˆ ll = vl vl where vl = n T˜l 0 . From ⊗ n h | | i Eqs. (A7) and (A9), we have ll′ where we deﬁne [¯χloc(iωp)]ll′ = Tr[ˆχloc(iωp)] and −1 [J¯(q)]ll′ = zγqJll′ . l′l Pˆ(q,iωp)= Pˆ0(iωp) zγq Jll′ Mˆ , (A10) Present address: Department of Applied Physics, University " − ′ # ∗ Xll of Tokyo, Tokyo, 113-8656, Japan

1 Y. Tokura and N. Nagaosa, Science 288, 462 (2000). 12 J. Schlappa, K. Wohlfeld, K. J. Zhou, M. Mourigal, 2 S. Maekawa, T. Tohyama, S. E. Barnes, S. Ishihara, W. Koshibae, M. W. Haverkort, V. N. Strocov, L. Hozoi, C. Monney, S. Nishi- and G. Khaliullin, Physics of Transition Metal Oxides (Springer moto, S. Singh, A. Revcolevschi, J.-S. Caux, L. Patthey, Verlag, Berlin, 2004). H. M. Rønnow, J. van den Brink, and T. Schmitt, Nature 485, 3 E. Saitoh, S. Okamoto, K. T. Takahashi, K. Tobe, K. Yamamoto, 82 (2012). T. Kimura, S. Ishihara, S. Maekawa, and Y. Tokura, Nature 410, 13 J. Inoue, S. Okamoto, S. Ishihara, W. Koshibae, Y. Kawamura, 180 (2001). and S. Maekawa, Physica B 237-238, 51 (1997). 4 S. Miyasaka, S. Onoda, Y. Okimoto, J. Fujioka, M. Iwama, N. Na- 14 S. Ishihara, Phys. Rev. B 69, 075118 (2004). gaosa, and Y. Tokura Phys. Rev. Lett. 94, 076405 (2005). 15 S. Ishihara, Y. Murakami, T. Inami, K. Ishii, J. Mizuki, K. Hirota, 5 C. Ulrich, A. Gössling, M. Grüninger, M. Guennou, H. Roth, S. Maekawa and Y. Endoh New J. Phys. 7, 119 (2005). M. Cwik, T. Lorenz, G. Khaliullin, and B. Keimer, Phys. Rev. 16 M. W. Haverkort, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 167404 (2010). Lett. 97, 157401 (2006). 17 L. J. P. Ament, G. Khaliullin, and J. van den Brink, Phys. Rev. B 6 S. Sugai, A. Kikuchi, and Y. Mori Phys. Rev. B 73, 161101 84, 020403 (2011). (2006). 18 M. Cyrot and C. Lyon-Caen, J. Phys. Paris 36, 253 (1975). 7 E. Benckiser, R. Rückamp, T. Möller, T. Taetz, A. Möller, 19 A. G. Komarov, L. I. Korovin, and E. K. Kudinov, A. A. Nugroho, T. T. M. Palstra, G. S. Uhrig, and M. Grüninger, Sov. Phys. Sol. Stat. 17, 1531 (1976). New J. Phys. 10, 053027 (2008). 20 S. Ishihara, J. Inoue and S. Maekawa, Physica C 263, (1996). 8 T. Inami, T. Fukuda, J. Mizuki, S. Ishihara, H. Kondo, H. Nakao, 21 S. Ishihara, J. Inoue and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. B 55, 8280 T. Matsumura, K. Hirota, Y. Murakami, S. Maekawa, and Y. En- (1997). doh, Phys. Rev. B 67, 045108 (2003). 22 S. Ishihara, and S. Maekawa, Phys. Rev. B 62, 2338 (2000). 9 Y. Tanaka, A. Q. R. Baron. Y.-J. Kim, K. J. Thomas, J. P. Hill, 23 J. Bała and A. M. Ole´s, Phys. Rev. B 62, R6085 (2000). Z. Honda, F. Iga, S. Tsutui, D. Ishihkawa and C. S. Nelson, 24 J. van den Brink, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 217202 (2001). New. J. Phys. 6 161 (2004). 25 G. A. Gehring, and K. A. Gehring, Rep. Prog. Phys. 38, 1 (1975). 10 C. Ulrich, L. J. P. Ament, G. Ghiringhelli, L. Braicovich, M. M. 26 M. D. Kaplan and B. G. Vekhter, Cooperative Phenomena in Sala, N. Pezzotta, T. Schmitt, G. Khaliullin, J. van den Brink, H. Jahn-Teller Crystals (Plenum Press, New York, 1995) Cahpter 6. Roth, T. Lorenz, and B. Keimer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 107205 27 As a review, I. B. Bersuker, The Jan-Teller Effect (Cambridge Uni- (2009). versity Press, Cambridge, 2006) Chapter 6. 11 K. Ishii, S. Ishihara, Y. Murakami, K. Ikeuchi, K. Kuzushita, T. In- 28 P. B. Allen and V. Perebeinos, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4828 (1999). ami, K. Ohwada, M. Yoshida, I. Jarrige, N. Tatami, S. Niioka, 29 K. I. Kugel and D. I. Khomskii, Sov. Phys. Lett. 15, 446 (1972). D. Bizen, Y. Ando, J. Mizuki, S. Maekawa, and Y. Endoh, Phys. 30 K. I. Kugel and D. I. Khomskii, Sov. Phys. -JETP 37, 725 (1974). Rev. B 83, 241101 (2011). 31 J. Sarfatt, and A. M. Stoneham, Proc. Phys. Soc. 91, 214 (1964). 13

32 N. Papanicolaou, Nucl. Phys. B 305, 367 (1988). 40 F. Ham, Phys. Rev. 166, 307 (1968). 33 F. P. Onufrieva, Sov. Phys. JETP 89, 2270 (1985). 41 K. P. Schmidt, M. Gr¨uninger, and G. S. Uhrig, Phys. Rev. B 76, 34 R. Shiina, H. Shiba, P. Thalmeier, A. Takahashi, and O. Sakai, J. 075108 (2007). Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72, 1216 (2003). 42 J. Kanamori, J. Appl. Phys. 31, S14 (1960). 35 H. Kusunose and Y. Kuramoto J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 70, 3076 (2001). 43 J. van den Brink, W. Stekelenburg, D. I. Khomskii, 36 A. Joshi, M. Ma, F. Mila, D. N. Shi, and F. C. Zhang, Phys. Rev. G. A. Sawatzky, and K. I. Kugel, Phys. Rev. B 58, 10276 B 60, 6584 (1999). (1998). 37 J. H. P. Colpa, Physica A 93, 327 (1978). 44 O. Sikora and A. M. Ole´s, Physica Status Solidi (B) 243, 133 38 W. Koller, D. Meyer, and A. C. Hewson, Phys. Rev. B 70, 155103 (2006). (2004). 39 M. C. M. O’Brien, Proc. Roy. Soc. (London) A281, 323 (1964).