Modern Greek Society and Politics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Modern Greek Society and Politics STUDIES ON MODERN GREEK SOCIETY AND POLITICS by George A. Kourvetaris EAST EUROPEAN MONOGRAPHS, BOULDER DISTRIBUTED BY COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY PRESS, NEW YORK 1999 344 Studies on Modern Greek rlr:rk and Turkish Interer Russian expansion. under British rule, the Greek cypriot nationalist id fumalist Revolution and r eye_rsed and was spearheaded by the Greek orthodoi church. Enosis t fu 1920s. There was an ar of the island with Greece was the major objective in the fSm, *A* mm:onalism. It was, after y1r uy ernr (the progressive of1,".y,'^::L:r-t1f Working people) ln: ".h.n"_neej rmueilg high among those for"**n the political leadeiship of Cyprus. fn ,nJrrrli. i in the pursuit of Makarios, the Greek orthodox Archbishop the *i nrrt"pr.riffi;# il; traces the historical of cyprus, appealed for support for self-determination r -a i"orp""or# st and nationalist Britain' Greece took the issue of cypriot self-determination to ui.6r a the communities Assembly in 1954 (Xydis, 1974). T]ne armed struggle for enosis was wa :ical importance. The r EOKA' the Nationar organization of cypriot Fighters. In response to the r.:jor issue of ethnic dir movement, the Turkish cypriots, instigated by the British, ,,*"0 ,n no movement eading role in the Enosi known as talcsim (partition). The tal<sim *ourrn"nt Jo On a different level partitioning of the island between oj the two motherlands, Greece *ti-** polarization 1960 Zurich in Cypru and London_accords which gave cyprus its independen". oil both the nal framework i enosis and tarcsim movements. In retrospect, Turkey and te rr r"nply, the Cyprus confl in de facto parritioning or tne isianO .o,i,ru.y Zurich9.{l:t:o^:1".:rdrg io o. ::. It is as much a pr and London accords. The Turliish inuurion-oi-;;; 'ention, * as it is a prol accomplished the partitioning of Cyprus.l aggravated by the forn :*ms of ethnicity and TIIE ROOTS OF ETIIMC COMLICT AND POLARIZATION etl rons stressed the prim ional attachment' ol The roots of conflict in Cyprus have been traced by a number of w iehood" or historical the i'edentist ideology of nationalism (Kitromilides, igTg; rurrnJo r, stressed theories r Nationalism in cyprus can be traced back to the nation"tiri ,oou.r", , (1982) defined "ethni Greek Revolution on ,,Great mainrand Greece in 1g21 and to the ldea": the c symbolism including 1840s onward. The ideology of nationalism was ingrained in the riteria of ethnic member of Enosis' Kitromilides (1979) berieves that despite the British cor lead to ethnic m changes and a liberal political culture, the Greek =ctors fo"A Cyprioi- c ilequality, nationalisn developed an extremely intolerant and antiliberal attitude to*-d th. d system theory the union of explain {avore{ cyprus with Greece. Kitromilides (rg7g)*gu.r,n* the period ical units to orgi of irredentist narionalism spearheaded by the Greei oirr"a* along ionalism. This mean with a segment of commercial and professional bourgeoisi", ,h. ; reignty, and cultural plur a,non-liberat t"-.p.1 and intolerance whichivere ingni"*d irredentistilgl-: *ly:g 6 ties. Subnational ethni, ideology of enosis (in Markides quoted by Kitromilid;1r"" ities from the state by According to Kirromilides (1979), ttre turlisn Cypriot developed as a by-product of rhree interlocking "r"_ pr"*u."r, #|#'r*s The Cyprus conflictplu the EoKA enosis movement, and mainland Turkish influence. Thc le of majority rule co cypriot nationalist movement of enosis gave way to the Turkish ( rc minority group. nationalist Each r counter-movement. The latter t*ua-ant can be traced bart ples and as a result no Srudies on Modern Gmert ir:ek and Turkish Interethnic Conflict 345 : Greek Cypriot nalional,rs 6raalist Revolution and the Asia Minor debacle between Greece and rurkey in :k Elunru tr i920s. There Onhodox Church. was an anti-Greek strain and resentment in the Turkish cypriot t'!!d naronalism. objective in the 1930s It was, after alr, an extension of mainrand rurkey's nutionais., bl',AKEL (the Proerqffiffi high among rhose led 5o-c who had fought the Greek armies that lanJed in Asia rship of Cyprus. In the c@ lfid-ror in the pursuit of rhe "Great Idea" (Kitromilides, 1979: 27). s;;;. (r9g4) l and first Fresident of frc ,0rsil traces the historical conflict between the Greek and rurkish cypriots to scermilation and indepenrdcnmr m-:dentist and nationalist ideologies of both mother countries *t i"r, nuu. etrf{etermination to the Ll$ piarized the communities into two distinct interest groups on every issue of ed struggle for enosis q"an milrinol:i:rical importance.i'-n^*^-^^ TheTL^ religious-^r:-:- factor has not adequately been ex"amined as ot Fighters. In response to fu rajor issue of ethnic division and polarization. However, ,t" ,t u."t ptayeo ed b1' the British, startod ffi iading role in the Enosis movement. The taksim moYemenl on a different level of analysis, one can trace the roots of ethnic conflicr notherlands, Greece and TmcbuP " polarization in Cyprus using two interdependent models, an C1prus its independenoe ercommunal framework ''e and the other an internationar relations moder."r" "f"rg To put retrospect, Turkey and fuc i:mply, the cyprus conflict has both an "internal" and "external,, dimension g of the island contrary m fu it' It is as much a problem of externar foreign powers, innuence ano rish invasion of Cypru.s n wention, as it is a problem of interethnic political iiscord. The latter has n aggravated by the former. The intercommunal framework explains conflict :erms of ethnicity and ethnic mobilization theories. Earlier .tuii", on Ltrrnic A}iD POLARIZATIOI{ e,uions stressed the primordial meaning of ethnicity, ttre 'we-reeting" ano rmtional attachment" of one group of people who share ',a sense of leetr traced by a number of rlehood" historical or identification with one another. Later studies, itnomilides, 1979; Markichn. 'eyer, stressed theories of ethnic mobilization. olzak (1gg3: :ss_:zo) anc r to the nationalist moYgrr"Fta el (1982) defined "ethnic mobilization as a collective action based on some "Great tdcn@ ic symbolism [82 1 and to the including skin color, language, [and] te*itorial identification rlism was ingrained in the riteria of ethnic membership." ,,a Rccoroinglo ih" ,"*" authors, number factors rar despite the British lead to ethnic mobilization including urbanization, modernization, Cypriot ic inequality, nationarism, he Greek local rabor market, and-economic competitive models.,, rrld system liberal attirude toward the theory explains ethnic mobilization in terms of world pressure for litromilides (1979) argues tur phical units to organize themserves as states. Nationalism begets eaded by the Greek Orthodot ionalism. This means that principles of self_determination, p;;;i", rfessional bourgeoisie, the ereignty, and cultural pluralism link nationalist ideology to subnationai ethnic which were ingraimd :tities. subnational rlerance ethnic identity is intended to create the exit of ethnic quoted l9f9: rities from ; by Kitromilides, the state by means of a secession movement from the unitary the Turkish Cypriot king pressures: British The cyprus conflict places two democratic principles in opposition when the land Turkish influence. The ;1nle. or majority rule competes against tire priniiple of uutono*y ro, tte c minority group. gave way to the Turkish Each of the two ethnic groups adheres to tt.r.ipporing movement can be traced bmi iples and as a result no sorution is in sight and a state or nostitiiy ano 346 Studies on Modern Greek freek and Turkish Interethnic Co perpetual conflict continues in Cyprus. The Greek Cypriots, as a r r: Grcek acknowledge the rights of the Turkish cypriot mintrity *itrri" , Cypriots. During the lfr democratic"state, n:uggle and enosis but the Turkish cypriots do not accept the minority with Greece. ! stafus. { rosis. Both of the major reasons of invasion and de partition Archbishop Makaric facto and colonization m ,*:der northern part of Cyprus precisely of EOKA who led is the long range objective of Turkey to the figll the demographic balance of Cyprus. has been :he British and those _It suggested (Kitromilides and couroumbis, Lgj5) Creek C-in modernization m-nosphere of mistrust. fosters ethnic conflict and, coupled with ethnic mobilizatim ethnic poriticization, The intercommunal it disrupts ethnicaily diverse societies. clashes il I psychological In a lqoience was directed experimental study, Lumsd"n itqZ:) examines tn. against the B Cyp*, the as a "prisoner's dilemma game" in which "war is self_sacrffice of not seen ;*;il-;. Srirish$ly:u:., Ci by- either side, and peace pareto-optimal ", in the 1950s was absenr offers a solution. " a pareio in I solution mejority of the requires giving up a more nationalistic conservative ,rr"r"-gjt Greek Cypriots *. cooperative strategy. -ri'fakarios was convince In order to understand the cyprus conflict, we m'sr d tiat enosi at both the intercommunal prns.sibility. The 1960 rerations between ttre creit ano rurnsn Cypriom constirution o the nrh enosls external or internarional factors that influence the intemal, of Cyprus with Grw intereihiric s rmrospect, relations between Greek Cypriots and Turkish Cypriots it was Turkey that benefit i" C;;;. r'Jependence from England. Wirh TIM INTERCOMMI.INAL rr lded by force AND IIYTERETHMC DIMENSION into a Greek C11 C..priots,- with the help of Turkish c "coexistence" nonhgrn pan under ottoman millet system referred to the relatir of cypn ;rcvince.:.T:: ": Turkey between the Greek and rurkish cypriots, uut the christian cr*t, *rr. iras &angeA rhe'; (a subservient status). t:?rus. Then, coexistence (1g7g-r955) under British coloniai led to a Greek Cypriot movement lry 1960 power_sharing for independence (Ioannid.r, iq99_ *.,, . constiru communication). How did today's ethnic Cypriot communiry conflict and porarizationcome ab t--.pnot5.3,:9*.f and r of Greek cypriot scholars, including tcitromitioes minority.
Recommended publications
  • The Gordian Knot: American and British Policy Concerning the Cyprus Issue: 1952-1974
    THE GORDIAN KNOT: AMERICAN AND BRITISH POLICY CONCERNING THE CYPRUS ISSUE: 1952-1974 Michael M. Carver A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of The requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS May 2006 Committee: Dr. Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor Dr. Gary R. Hess ii ABSTRACT Douglas J. Forsyth, Advisor This study examines the role of both the United States and Great Britain during a series of crises that plagued Cyprus from the mid 1950s until the 1974 invasion by Turkey that led to the takeover of approximately one-third of the island and its partition. Initially an ancient Greek colony, Cyprus was conquered by the Ottoman Empire in the late 16th century, which allowed the native peoples to take part in the island’s governance. But the idea of Cyprus’ reunification with the Greek mainland, known as enosis, remained a significant tenet to most Greek-Cypriots. The movement to make enosis a reality gained strength following the island’s occupation in 1878 by Great Britain. Cyprus was integrated into the British imperialist agenda until the end of the Second World War when American and Soviet hegemony supplanted European colonialism. Beginning in 1955, Cyprus became a battleground between British officials and terrorists of the pro-enosis EOKA group until 1959 when the independence of Cyprus was negotiated between Britain and the governments of Greece and Turkey. The United States remained largely absent during this period, but during the 1960s and 1970s came to play an increasingly assertive role whenever intercommunal fighting between the Greek and Turkish-Cypriot populations threatened to spill over into Greece and Turkey, and endanger the southeastern flank of NATO.
    [Show full text]
  • The Liberation Struggle of Eoka 1955-1959 and the Chloraka Coast
    THE LIBERATION STRUGGLE OF EOKA 1955-1959 AND THE CHLORAKA COAST Today the Chloraka coast in Paphos is a busy tourist area. At the time of the 1955-1959 struggle for liberation, however, it was a remote deserted shoreline, and this is why it was cho- sen as the site for the secret arrival from Greece of EOKA leader George Grivas Dhigenis and for receipt of the first shipments of arms. Because of the very important events that took place here during preparations for the EOKA struggle in 1954 and the early part of 1955, the Chloraka coast and particularly the areas "Alyki", "Rodafinia" and "Vrexi" are among the most important monumental sites of the 1955-1959 struggle for freedom. It was here that the flame of freedom was lit for the first time. It was from here that the message was spread to the whole of Cyprus that the yoke of English Colonial Rule was about to be thrown off. THE CHAPEL OF SAINT GEORGE About two hundred metres from the sea, at the place known as "Alyki", where the leader Dhigenis disem- barked on 10 November 1954, Zena Gunther built the chapel of Saint George, at her own expense, in honour of the military leader. The chapel, which was later decorated with icons by George and Alexander Constantinides under the supervision of Paphos Diocese and with donations from Christians, is now an integral part of the monu- mental site on the Chloraka coast. Together with the other monumental works, it serves to perpetuate his- toric memory and to underline the Christian faith that inspired the freedom fighters of the struggle and was indissolubly linked to their love for freedom for the fatherland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Origins of Greek Cypriot National Identity
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 12-1998 The Origins of Greek Cypriot National Identity Elena Koumna Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Political Science Commons Recommended Citation Koumna, Elena, "The Origins of Greek Cypriot National Identity" (1998). Master's Theses. 3888. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3888 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ORIGINS OF GREEK CYPRIOT NATIONAL IDENTITY by Elena Koumna A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillmentof the requirements forthe Degree of Master of Arts Department of Political Science Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan December 1998 Copyrightby Elena Koumna 1998 To all those who never stop seeking more knowledge ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis could have never been written without the support of several people. First, I would like to thank my chair and mentor, Dr. Jim Butterfield, who patiently guided me through this challenging process. Without his initial encouragement and guidance to pursue the arguments examined here, this thesis would not have materialized. He helped me clarify and organize my thoughts at a time when my own determination to examine Greek Cypriot identity was coupled with many obstacles. His continuing support and most enlightening feedbackduring the writing of the thesis allowed me to deal with the emotional and content issues that surfaced repeatedly.
    [Show full text]
  • A Historical Perspective on Entrepreneurial Environment and Business-Government-Society Relationship in Cyprus
    A Historical Perspective on Entrepreneurial Environment and Business-Government-Society Relationship in Cyprus Gizem ÖKSÜZOĞLU GÜVEN, PhD. Brunel Business School, Brunel University United Kingdom ABSTRACT This article studies the entrepreneurial environment and business-government-society relationship in Cyprus during the Ottoman Empire period (1571-1878) and during the British Colonial period (1878- 1960) with an emphasis on Cypriot Turks. These two periods have particular socio-cultural and economic importance in Cypriot history. Furthermore, these periods are significant in terms of setting out the basis of today’s entrepreneurial culture and practices in Cyprus. This article presents insights on the governance styles, significant figures and positions within society during those periods. It also discusses the connections between administrative officials and businesses. By doing so, it aims to shed light on the entrepreneurial environment in each of these periods. Extensive research of historical documents and relevant literature suggests quite similar structures in both periods, yet more complicated relationships during the British Colonial period. Keywords: Entrepreneurial environment, business-government-society relationship, Cyprus, business history, Ottoman Empire period, British colonial period, 1. Introduction This article aims to shed light on entrepreneurial practices and business-government-society relationship during two of the most recent and influential periods of Cyprus; the Ottoman Empire period and the British Colonial period. This article provides insights to current entrepreneurs and foreign investors to understand the antecedents of business culture, certain practices and structures that originate from those two periods in order to better adapt to the current entrepreneurial environment. The first section discusses each period, the way entrepreneurial practice and business-government- society relationship were shaped and the second section provides a discussion.
    [Show full text]
  • From the “Millet System‟‟ to a Hostage Minority: Greek Community of Turkey Or a Trump Card in Cyprus Issue 1954-1955
    International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, Vol. 5, No. 6, June 2015 From the “Millet System‟‟ to a Hostage Minority: Greek Community of Turkey or a Trump Card in Cyprus Issue 1954-1955 Resul Babaoglu the weakening of the central authority. It can be said that Abstract—The Cyprus issue, especially since 1951, was non-Muslims in the Ottoman Empire lived the most evaluated as an important topic in Turkey's foreign policy comfortable period in every aspect especially as agenda. Since that date, Cyprus issue has created the main demographically from the declaration of the Kanun-u Esasi reason of the tension observed in the relations with Greece. On (The first Meshrutiyet period) in 1876 to the World War I [4]. the other hand, this negative table also had too deep effects on the Greek originated citizens of Turkey. For the realization of On the other hand, the Young Turks' (Jeune Turq) appearing the purpose of connecting the island of the Greeks to Greece, in political scene and working to place the secular order the offensive and destruction actions against the Turks and the across the country has also influenced the Greek society. British rule after a short time in Turkey found correspond to During this period, the Greeks sent the chosen people to the nationalist reflexes. In this article, by investigating the Meclis-i İdare-i Vilayet and Karma Milli Meclis. [5]. When effects of the tension lived in Cyprus to Turkey Greek evaluated in this respect, the Ottoman Greek community has community, the difficulties and societal responses caused by that period are evaluated in terms of Greek community.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crux of the Cyprus Problem
    PERCEPTIONS JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS September - November 1999 Volume IV - Number 3 THE CRUX OF THE CYPRUS PROBLEM RAUF R. DENKTAŞ His Excellency Rauf R. Denktaş is President of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus Anthony Nutting, who was the British Minister of State at the Foreign Office during the period 1954-56, wrote in his book I Saw for Myself his impression following talks with the leaders of Turkish Cypriots and Greek Cypriots: “There is nothing Cypriot about Cyprus except its name. In this beautiful beleaguered island you are either a Greek or a Turk. From the leaders of the two communities downwards the chasm of suspicion and hatred which separates them is frighteningly wide.”1 EOKA terrorism, which aimed to unite the island with Greece (enosis), was at its height and the Turkish Cypriots, who looked upon enosis as changing colonial masters for the worst, resisted it with every means at their disposal. Hence, the message passed on to all young Greek Cypriots was, “the struggle against the real enemy of our nation and religion, the remnants of the occupying power in Cyprus, will commence as soon as the fight for enosis comes to a successful conclusion”! Any Greek Cypriot who saw the futility and the danger of the drive for enosis, and thus supported independence as a more suitable solution, was regarded as a traitor to the national cause and murdered by EOKA (the Greek Cypriot terrorist organisation). In fact, everyone who opposed enosis was declared an enemy and lived under a constant threat. All Turkish Cypriots were against enosis! By 1957, inter-communal clashes assumed the character of a civil war.
    [Show full text]
  • British Intelligence Against Eoka in Cyprus 1945-1960
    BRITISH INTELLIGENCE AGAINST EOKA IN CYPRUS 1945-1960 A THESIS SUBMITTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF SOCIAL SCIENCES OF MIDDLE EAST TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY BY NİHAL ERKAN IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN THE DEPARTMENT OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS JULY 2019 Approval of the Graduate School of Social Sciences ___________________________ Prof. Dr. Tülin Gençöz Director I certify that this thesis satisfies all the requirements as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. ___________________________ Prof.Dr.Oktay Tanrısever Head of Department This is to certify that we have read this thesis and that in our opinion it is fully adequate, in scope and quality, as a thesis for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. _____________________ Prof.Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı Supervisor Examining Committee Members Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Fatih Tayfur (METU, IR) _____________________ Prof. Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı (METU,IR) _____________________ Prof. Dr. Oktay Tanrısever (METU,IR) _____________________ Prof. Dr. Gökhan Koçer (Karadeniz Teknik Uni., ULS) _____________________ Assist. Prof.Dr. Merve Seren (Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Uni., INRE) _____________________ I hereby declare that all information in this document has been obtained and presented in accordance with academic rules and ethical conduct. I also declare that, as required by these rules and conduct, I have fully cited and referenced all material and results that are not original to this work. Name, Last name : Nihal Erkan Signature : iii ABSTRACT BRITISH INTELLIGENCE AGAINST EOKA IN CYPRUS, 1945-1960 Erkan, Nihal Ph.D; Department of International Relations Supervisor: Prof.Dr. Hüseyin Bağcı July 2019, 367 pages This thesis analyses the role of British intelligence activities in the fight against EOKA in Cyprus between 1945 and 1960.
    [Show full text]
  • I) the Imagined Cypriot: a Barred Space for Claiming the Island
    HDIM.NGO/84/07 25 September 2007 OSCE-ODIHR 2007 HUMAN DIMENSION IMPLEMENTATION MEETING 24 September- 5 October/ Warsaw Kirlangic Cultural Association Address: Sht. Salahi Sevket sok, No.16, Nicosia/ North Cyprus e-mail: kirlangickultur a gmail.com Turkish Cypriots’ Problem of Identity Historical Overview: The Cyprus Problem was a problem of two conflicting nationalisms (Turkish and Greek), thus was a matter of two opposing imaginations which emerged during the 1950s and lasted until today. The advent of British colonialism in 1878 and political technologies of the colonial rule played a significant role in the emergence of this conflict, especially in the rise of the Greek Cypriot national mobilization for Enosis (union with Greece).1 In the mid-1950s, EOKA2 took up an armed struggle against colonial rule in order to achieve union with Greece and in a very short time this anti- colonial struggle became popular among the Greek Cypriot community under the leadership of the Cypriot Orthodox Church. In fact, the Greek Cypriots’ anti-colonial struggle was interpreted as one for liberation; however, from the angle of the Turkish Cypriots it was a mere disaster since it aimed to assimilate Turkish Cypriots inside the 1 The Enosis movement was part of a greater project of Greek nationalist mythology, the Megali Idea, which was elaborated in the 1840s. The Megali Idea was a belief “in the necessity of building up a greater state of two continents and five seas to cover all Greek speaking Christian Orthodox part of the Byzantine Empire”. This was a type of irredentist policy that was based on the effort to raise ethnic consciousness amongst the ethnos (nation) in the diaspora.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cyprus Question and the Role of the UN: an Overall Assessment
    The Cyprus Question and the Role of the UN: An Overall Assessment Andreas Theophanous Odysseas Christou Since its creation the Republic of Cyprus has had a very turbulent history. From the outset the geopolitical implications of the Treaty of Establishment, the Treaty of Alliance, and the Treaty of Guarantee on the one hand and the particular characteristics of the Cold War on the other were not fully understood. Domestic tensions as well as foreign interventions led eventually to the cataclysmic events of the summer of 1974. Fifty years after the establishment of the Republic of Cyprus, this island-state faces critical problems and multidimensional challenges.1 The greatest challenge remains the reestablishment of the territorial integrity and unity of the country. Prior to the Turkish invasion of 1974, the basis of the intercommunal negotiations revolved around the establishment of a unitary state with elements of local and communal, self-administration on issues of low level politics. Since the latter part of the 1970s, the model for the solution to the Cyprus problem, according to conventional orthodoxy, has essentially been a bizonal bicommunal federation.2 Yet despite successive and repeated rounds of intercommunal negotiations under the auspices of the UN and the support of the international community there has not been an agreement.3 In fact, the problem remains unresolved while the gap between the two sides is widening. Thus, it is not surprising that to the present day the bizonal bicommunal federation does not yet have a commonly accepted precise definition. Besides it is indeed doubtful whether the implementation of such a model could lead to stability and cooperation.4 Historical Background and Context Cyprus is the third largest island in the Mediterranean, located approximately 70 km to the south of Turkey.
    [Show full text]
  • A Comparative Analysis on the Eu's Reactions To
    A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS ON THE EU’S REACTIONS TO MILITARY INTERVENTIONS IN TURKEY AND GREECE Nihan Akıncılar Köseoğlu1 Abstract2 During the last century, several military interventions occurred in Turkey and Greece. These military interventions into politics were tolerable until the end of the Second World War, as the world had been facing ongoing warfare since the early 20th century. However, in the early Cold War era, major international institutions were established to prevent war by forming alliances between countries. In this context, Turkey and Greece applied for membership in the European Economic Community (EEC) in 1959 in order to improve their economies through financial aids and their political systems by integrating into Europe. However, the EEC did not approve of the coups d’état of the Turkish and Greek military and objected to the military regimes which were founded subsequently. Arguing that the military interventions disrupted Turkish and Greek democracies, the Community insisted on the replacement of military rule with civilian politicians. In the light of this demand, this article compares the reactions of the EEC to the Turkish and Greek coups d’état in 1960 and in 1967 respectively. And it argues that the EEC showed stronger reaction to the Greek coup than to the Turkish coup. Even though the EEC was then just an economic organization, its responses to the coups show the sign of its future transformation into a multidimensional organization. Keywords: EU, Military Interventions, Civil-Military Relations, Democratization, Turkish-Greek Relations. AVRUPA BİRLİĞİ’NİN TÜRKİYE VE YUNANİSTAN’DAKİ ASKERİ MÜDAHALELERE TEPKİSİNİN KARŞILAŞTIRMALI BİR ANALİZİ Özet Geçtiğimiz yüzyılda, Türkiye ve Yunanistan’da birçok askeri müdahale yaşanmıştır.
    [Show full text]
  • A Study of the Role of Intellectuals in the 1931 Uprising
    Western Michigan University ScholarWorks at WMU Master's Theses Graduate College 8-1999 Intellectuals and Nationalism in Cyprus: A Study of the Role of Intellectuals in the 1931 Uprising Georgios P. Loizides Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses Part of the Sociology Commons Recommended Citation Loizides, Georgios P., "Intellectuals and Nationalism in Cyprus: A Study of the Role of Intellectuals in the 1931 Uprising" (1999). Master's Theses. 3885. https://scholarworks.wmich.edu/masters_theses/3885 This Masters Thesis-Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate College at ScholarWorks at WMU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Master's Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at WMU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. INTELLECTUALS AND NATIONALISM IN CYPRUS: A STUDY OF THE ROLE OF INTELLECTUALS IN THE 1931 UPRISING by Georgios P. Loizides A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of The Graduate College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts Department of Sociology Western Michigan University Kalamazoo, Michigan August 1999 Copyright by Georgios P. Loizides 1999 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to begin by thanking the members of my Thesis Committee, Dr. Paula Brush (chair), Dr. Douglas Davidson, and Dr. Vyacheslav Karpov for their invaluable help, guidance and insight, before and during the whole thesis-pregnancy period. Secondly, I would like to thank my friends and colleagues at the Department of Sociology for their feedback and support, without which this pro­ ject would surely be less informed. Georgios P.
    [Show full text]
  • Venizelos Arşivi'ndeki* Belgelerle Kıbrıslı Ortodoks Din Adamlarının Enosis'e Yönelik Girişimlerine Örnekler
    Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmaları Recent Period Turkish Studies Yakın Dönem Türkiye Araştırmaları Sayı/Issue: 38, 2020 DOI: 10.26650/YTA2020-759296 Araştırma Makalesi / Research Article Venizelos Arşivi’ndeki* Belgelerle Kıbrıslı Ortodoks Din Adamlarının Enosis’e Yönelik Girişimlerine Örnekler (1914-1954) Examples from the Initiatives of Cyprus Orthodox Clergymen Related to Enosis with Documents from the Venizelos Archive (1914-1954) Nilüfer ERDEM** ÖZ Makalemizde Ortodoks din adamlarının 1914-1954 döneminde Kıbrıs’ta ortaya koydukları Enosis’i, yani adanın Yunanistan’la birleşmesini gerçekleştirmeye yönelik girişimlerine örnekler sunmak ve Rum cemaat içinde oynadıkları liderlik rolünün altını çizmek amaçlanmıştır. Ele aldığımız dönem İngiltere’nin adayı **Doç. Dr., İstanbul Üniversitesi, Atatürk tek taraflı olarak ilhak ettiğini açıklamasıyla başlamakta ve Kıbrıs sorununun İlkeleri ve İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Türkiye Birleşmiş Milletlere taşınmasına kadar uzanmaktadır. Amacımız doğrultusunda ağırlıklı olarak Dijital Venizelos Arşivi’nde (bundan böyle Venizelos Arşivi olarak ORCID: N.E. 0000-0003-1393-7655 zikredilecektir) yer alan Kıbrıs’la ilgili belgeler kullanılmıştır. Rumlar, adanın Sorumlu yazar/Corresponding author: İngiltere’nin idaresine geçmesini nihai hedeflerine daha kolay ulaşabileceklerini Nilüfer Erdem, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Atatürk İlkeleri ve düşünerek olumlu karşılamışlarsa da çeşitli vesilelerle İngiliz idaresinden İnkılap Tarihi Enstitüsü, İstanbul, Türkiye şikâyetlerde bulunmaktan geri durmamışlardır.
    [Show full text]