DOCSLIB.ORG

RESOLUTION on the PEOPLE's REPUBLIC of CHINA. Assembly of Delegates of PEN International, Meeting at Its 80Th World Congress I

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
RESOLUTION on the PEOPLE's REPUBLIC of CHINA. Assembly of Delegates of PEN International, Meeting at Its 80Th World Congress I RESOLUTION ON THE PEOPLE’S REPUBLIC OF CHINA. Assembly of Delegates of PEN International, meeting at its 80th World Congress in Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan 29th September to 2nd October 2014 Welcomes the release of ICPC honorary member Xu Wanping due to the sentence reduction and releases on bail of ICPC members Liu Di, Hu Shigen, Luo Xi, and its honorary members Wang Gongquan, Xu Youyu and Hao Jian since the last PEN International Congress in September 2012. Also welcomes the abandonment of infamous “Re-education Through Labour” (RTL) system as decided by the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress of PRC in December 2013. Considers the continuous suppression of the right to freedom of expression throughout China, from its capital city of Beijing to the inland province of Anhui, Henan, Huibei, Hunan and Sichuan, to the coastal province of Liao Ning, Guangdong and Zhejiang, and to the Autonomous Regions of Tibet, Xinjiang, and Inner Mongolia. Alarmed by the relentless harassment of and attacks against Chinese intellectuals, particularly the arbitrary arrests of Internet writers and journalists, over 40 of whom are currently imprisoned, making China one of the largest jailers of writers and journalists in the world. Disturbed by the increasing misuse of China’s Criminal Law to arbitrarily charge dissident writers, outspoken journalists and independent publishers with criminal offences to suppress freedom of expression and the press, in particular “endangering the social/national security”, “(inciting) subversion of state power”, ““(inciting) split of the country”, “illegally holding/leaking/providing state secrets” and “illegal business practices”, or extensively abuse of the charges used to combat the gangsters such as "assembling a crowd to disrupt order in public places ", "creating disturbance " and various alleged “economic crimes” for the dissident writers, academics, journalists and publishers, including the sentence of ICPC honorary members LIU Benqi (three years), the charges and various economic offense including the sentencing of CAO HaXU Zhiyong and YAO Wentian (ten years), as well as the arbitrary detentions and illegal house-arrest of writers and human rights activists. Worried about the growing censorship of the Internet throughout the country, including blocking the popular social network websites Twitter and Facebook, closure of popular Chinese internet forums discussing sensitive issues, and harassment of online writers and journalists and imprisonment for their publication of critical reports and commentaries on overseas websites. Shocked by the increasing persecution of Independent Chinese PEN Centre (ICPC) members, including the on-going imprisonment of LIU Xiaobo (11 years), YANG Tongyan (12 years), ZHU Yufu (seven years), ZHAO Changqing (two years and half), ZHANG Lin ( sentenced to 3.5 years imprisonment on 29 August 2014), LI Huaping (detained since August 2013), GAO Yu (f, since April 2014), Lu Gongsong (detained on subversion charges since 8 July 2014) and Chen Shuqing (detained on subversion charges since 11 September 2014) ; the interrogation, harassment, threats, attacks, brief detentions, meeting and travel restrictions, passport rejections, and the work and life interruptions of more than 60 members, including all of the former and current directors and staff. PEN International therefore urges the government of the People’s Republic of China to: • Stop the harassment and persecution of ICPC members, and lift all restrictions on their freedom to exit and enter mainland China, particularly to attend PEN International conferences and to return home; • Cease its efforts to censor cyberspace and to immediately release all internet writers jailed for peacefully expressing their opinions; • Release all prisoners in the autonomous regions of Tibet, Xinjiang Uyghur and Inner Mongolia who have been detained in violation of their right to freedom of expression, including Tibetan writers and journalists Dolma Kyab, Kunchok Tsephel Gopey Tsang, Paljor Norbu, Gangkye Drubpa Kyab and Gartse Jigmey; Uighur writers Nijat Azat, Gheyret Niyaz, Memetjan Abdulla and Gulmira Imin (f) and ILHAM Tohti, and Mongolian writer Hada (still detained after having served a 15-year imprisonment term); • Release all imprisoned writers and journalists in China, including LIU Xiaobo, YANG Tongyan, ZHU Yufu, ZHAO Changqing, ZHANG Lin,LI Huaping, GAO Yu, LU Jianhua, QI Chonghai, LIU Xianbin, GUO Quan, LI Tie, CHEN Wei, CHEN Xi, LU Jiaping, JIN Andi, RAO Wenwei, LI Bifeng, CAO Haibo, LIU Benqi, XU Zhiyong, YAO Wentian, PU Zhiqiang, YANG Maodong and TANG Jingling. • Ratify the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which was signed by the People’s Republic of China in October 1998; • Engage in a complete and meaningful reform of the Chinese legal system in accordance with international standards and its own Constitution to guarantee fair trials with full rights of defence and appeal, the legal practices of attorneys, and a prison system that ensures the health and safety of inmates; particularly to cease the practice of using the charge of “subversion”/ “Separatism” against writers, of “holding/leaking state secrets” against journalists, of “illegal business against publishers, and of “creating disturbance” against internet dissidents and rights defenders. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Amnesty International
    amnesty international PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA No Improvement in Human Rights: The Imprisonment of dissidents in 1998 4 March 1999 AI Index: ASA 17/14/99 Despite the marking of the 50th anniversary of the adoption of the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights in 1998 and despite the recent signing by China of the two United Nations Covenants on Human Rights there are still no guarantees for the Chinese people that they will not be detained or arrested for seeking the freedoms of association and expression enshrined in the UN Declaration. In the past twelve months, many scores of people throughout China have been detained, harassed and imprisoned solely for exercising these rights. The Chinese government’s signing of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) in October 1998, the visits to China of American President Bill Clinton, and the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mary Robinson were heralded as triumphs for diplomacy and human rights ‘dialogue’. International opinion began to suggest that the Chinese authorities were making improvements in human rights. However, as the prospect of international censure recedes and the international spotlight faded, the Chinese authorities once again began to crack down on dissidents and activists. During the last few weeks of 1998, over 29 dissidents were detained, four leading dissidents sentenced to lengthy terms of imprisonment and several other dissidents and labour activists have been sentenced to re-education through labour terms and lengthy terms of imprisonment. Since October 1998 when China signed the ICCPR it is estimated that over 80 dissidents have been detained and at least 15 high profile dissidents have been given heavy prison sentences or assigned to re-education through labour.
    [Show full text]
  • 28. Rights Defense and New Citizen's Movement
    JOBNAME: EE10 Biddulph PAGE: 1 SESS: 3 OUTPUT: Fri May 10 14:09:18 2019 28. Rights defense and new citizen’s movement Teng Biao 28.1 THE RISE OF THE RIGHTS DEFENSE MOVEMENT The ‘Rights Defense Movement’ (weiquan yundong) emerged in the early 2000s as a new focus of the Chinese democracy movement, succeeding the Xidan Democracy Wall movement of the late 1970s and the Tiananmen Democracy movement of 1989. It is a social movement ‘involving all social strata throughout the country and covering every aspect of human rights’ (Feng Chongyi 2009, p. 151), one in which Chinese citizens assert their constitutional and legal rights through lawful means and within the legal framework of the country. As Benney (2013, p. 12) notes, the term ‘weiquan’is used by different people to refer to different things in different contexts. Although Chinese rights defense lawyers have played a key role in defining and providing leadership to this emerging weiquan movement (Carnes 2006; Pils 2016), numerous non-lawyer activists and organizations are also involved in it. The discourse and activities of ‘rights defense’ (weiquan) originated in the 1990s, when some citizens began using the law to defend consumer rights. The 1990s also saw the early development of rural anti-tax movements, labor rights campaigns, women’s rights campaigns and an environmental movement. However, in a narrow sense as well as from a historical perspective, the term weiquan movement only refers to the rights campaigns that emerged after the Sun Zhigang incident in 2003 (Zhu Han 2016, pp. 55, 60). The Sun Zhigang incident not only marks the beginning of the rights defense movement; it also can be seen as one of its few successes.
    [Show full text]
  • Tragic Anniversary of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Protests and Massacre
    TRAGIC ANNIVERSARY OF THE 1989 TIANANMEN SQUARE PROTESTS AND MASSACRE HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON AFRICA, GLOBAL HEALTH, GLOBAL HUMAN RIGHTS, AND INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OF THE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED THIRTEENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION JUNE 3, 2013 Serial No. 113–69 Printed for the use of the Committee on Foreign Affairs ( Available via the World Wide Web: http://www.foreignaffairs.house.gov/ or http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/ U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 81–341PDF WASHINGTON : 2013 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate 0ct 09 2002 10:13 Nov 03, 2013 Jkt 000000 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 F:\WORK\_AGH\060313\81341 HFA PsN: SHIRL COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS EDWARD R. ROYCE, California, Chairman CHRISTOPHER H. SMITH, New Jersey ELIOT L. ENGEL, New York ILEANA ROS-LEHTINEN, Florida ENI F.H. FALEOMAVAEGA, American DANA ROHRABACHER, California Samoa STEVE CHABOT, Ohio BRAD SHERMAN, California JOE WILSON, South Carolina GREGORY W. MEEKS, New York MICHAEL T. MCCAUL, Texas ALBIO SIRES, New Jersey TED POE, Texas GERALD E. CONNOLLY, Virginia MATT SALMON, Arizona THEODORE E. DEUTCH, Florida TOM MARINO, Pennsylvania BRIAN HIGGINS, New York JEFF DUNCAN, South Carolina KAREN BASS, California ADAM KINZINGER, Illinois WILLIAM KEATING, Massachusetts MO BROOKS, Alabama DAVID CICILLINE, Rhode Island TOM COTTON, Arkansas ALAN GRAYSON, Florida PAUL COOK, California JUAN VARGAS, California GEORGE HOLDING, North Carolina BRADLEY S.
    [Show full text]
  • Urgent Action
    Further information on UA: 138/16 Index: ASA 17/4360/2016 China Date: 30 June 2016 URGENT ACTION FIVE ACTIVISTS RELEASED, SIX STILL DETAINED Five activists have been released on bail, but six remained detained for commemorations of the 27th anniversary of the Tiananmen crackdown. They are at risk of torture and other ill- treatment. During the months of May and June, a total of eleven activists from Beijing, Sichuan and Chongqing have been detained after commemorating the 27th Anniversary of Tiananmen crackdown. On 21 June, Ma Qing from Sichuan were released on bail; she was originally detained for “picking quarrels and provoking trouble” for promoting on WeChat an advertisement for a baijiu, a popular alcoholic drink, with a label that read, “Remember, Eight Liquor Six Four” echoing the date of June 4, 1989. The label also has the picture of the iconic “tank man”. Four activists from Beijing, Xu Caihong, Ma Xinli, Liang Taiping, Li Wei were released on bail on 29 June. They were criminally detained on suspicion of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble” after their gathering in Beijing to commemorate the anniversary. Authorities have hunted down activists who organized commemoration activities for the Tiananmen crackdown. Six activists remained in detention, including Zhang Baocheng, Zhao Changqing, Fu Hailu, Luo Yaling, Luo Fu Yu and Zhang Junyong. Zhang Baocheng and Zhao Changqing, criminally detained on suspicion of “picking quarrels and provoking trouble”, are still detained in Fengtai District Detention Centre in Beijing; while Fu Hailu, Luo Fuyu and Zhang Junyong, who were involved in the bajjiu case and were each criminally detained on suspicion of “inciting subversion of state power”, are currently detained at Chengdu City Detention Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Testimony of Zhou Fengsuo, President Humanitarian China and Student Leader of the 1989 Tiananmen Square Demonstrations
    Testimony of Zhou Fengsuo, President Humanitarian China and student leader of the 1989 Tiananmen Square demonstrations Congressman McGovern, Senator Rubio, Members of Congress, thank you for inviting me to speak in this special moment on the 30th anniversary of Tiananmen Massacre. As a participant of the 1989 Democracy Movement and a survivor of the Massacre started in the evening of June 3rd, it is both my honor and duty to speak, for these who sacrificed their lives for the freedom and democracy of China, for the movement that ignited the hope of change that was so close, and for the last 30 years of indefatigable fight for truth and justice. I was a physics student at Tsinghua University in 1989. The previous summer of 1988, I organized the first and only free election of the student union of my department. I was amazed and encouraged by the enthusiasm of the students to participate in the process of self-governing. There was a palpable sense for change in the college campuses. When Hu Yaobang died on April 15, 1989. His death triggered immediately widespread protests in top universities of Beijing, because he was removed from the position of the General Secretary of CCP in 1987 for his sympathy towards the protesting students and for being too open minded. The next day I went to Tiananmen Square to offer a flower wreath with my roommates of Tsinghua University. To my pleasant surprise, my words on the wreath was published the next day by a national official newspaper. We were the first group to go to Tiananmen Square to mourn Hu Yaobang.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Reports on Human Rights Practices 2003: China (Includes Tibet, Hong Kong and Macau)
    Page 1 of 66 China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau) Country Reports on Human Rights Practices - 2003 Released by the Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor February 25, 2004 (Note: Also see the section for Tibet, the report for Hong Kong, and the report for Macau.) The People's Republic of China (PRC) is an authoritarian state in which, as directed by the Constitution, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP or Party) is the paramount source of power. Party members hold almost all top government, police, and military positions. Ultimate authority rests with the 24-member political bureau (Politburo) of the CCP and its 9-member standing committee. Leaders made a top priority of maintaining stability and social order and were committed to perpetuating the rule of the CCP and its hierarchy. Citizens lacked both the freedom peacefully to express opposition to the Party-led political system and the right to change their national leaders or form of government. Socialism continued to provide the theoretical underpinning of national politics, but Marxist economic planning has given way to pragmatism, and economic decentralization increased the authority of local officials. The Party's authority rested primarily on the Government's ability to maintain social stability; appeals to nationalism and patriotism; Party control of personnel, media, and the security apparatus; and continued improvement in the living standards of most of the country's 1.3 billion citizens. The Constitution provides for an independent judiciary; however, in practice, the Government and the CCP, at both the central and local levels, frequently interfered in the judicial process and directed verdicts in many high-profile cases.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Face of Rapidly Deteriorating Status of Human Rights, It Is Time to Say “No” to Oppressors
    In the face of rapidly deteriorating status of human rights, it is time to say “No” to oppressors Hearing of the Committee on Foreign Affairs to be held by the Subcommittee on Africa, Global Health, Global Human Rights, and International Organizations in Room 2172 of the Rayburn House Office Building DATE: Thursday, December 5, 2013 TIME: 11:00 a.m. SUBJECT: The Daughters Appeal to Beijing: “Let Our Fathers Go!” CHAIRMAN: Christopher H. Smith(R-NJ) Pastor Bob Fu, president of China Aid Association Honorable Chairman and Vice Chairman of the U.S. House Committee on Foreign Affairs, members of Congressmen, and friends, This is the third time in this year that I sit here to testify before the U. S. Congress, the international community, and all the people concerned with China’s human rights condition about the rapid deterioration of human rights condition in China. Having in front of me the five daughters of imprisoned men in China, who were sentenced to long prison terms simply because they held different views, peacefully expressed their views, or peacefully protested against the tyranny of the Chinese Communist authorities, and Chen Guangfu, brother of the Chinese blind rights defender Chen Guangcheng, whose son is still in prison and denied medical treatment he needs for his illness, I can’t express with words the pain and anger in my heart. China Aid Association has been monitoring China’s human rights condition for 11 years, and because we specifically focus on religious persecution, human rights violations, and the promotion of the rule of law in China, we got to know hundreds and thousands of sons, daughters and family members of the prisons of conscience like Ti-Anna Wang, Lisa Jiayin Peng, Grace Ge Geng, Bridgette Qiao Chen and Danielle Xiaodan Wang.
    [Show full text]
  • China COI Compilation-March 2014
    China COI Compilation March 2014 ACCORD is co-funded by the European Refugee Fund, UNHCR and the Ministry of the Interior, Austria. Commissioned by the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, Division of International Protection. UNHCR is not responsible for, nor does it endorse, its content. Any views expressed are solely those of the author. ACCORD - Austrian Centre for Country of Origin & Asylum Research and Documentation China COI Compilation March 2014 This COI compilation does not cover the Special Administrative Regions of Hong Kong and Macau, nor does it cover Taiwan. The decision to exclude Hong Kong, Macau and Taiwan was made on the basis of practical considerations; no inferences should be drawn from this decision regarding the status of Hong Kong, Macau or Taiwan. This report serves the specific purpose of collating legally relevant information on conditions in countries of origin pertinent to the assessment of claims for asylum. It is not intended to be a general report on human rights conditions. The report is prepared on the basis of publicly available information, studies and commentaries within a specified time frame. All sources are cited and fully referenced. This report is not, and does not purport to be, either exhaustive with regard to conditions in the country surveyed, or conclusive as to the merits of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Every effort has been made to compile information from reliable sources; users should refer to the full text of documents cited and assess the credibility, relevance and timeliness of source material with reference to the specific research concerns arising from individual applications.
    [Show full text]
  • A Nightmarish Year Under Xi Jinping's
    Promoting human rights & empowering grassroots activism in China A Nightmarish Year Under Xi Jinping’s “Chinese Dream” 2013 Annual Report on the Situation of Human Rights Defenders in China March 2014 Web: www.chrdnet.com • Email: [email protected] Table of Contents Introduction: Defining Features of 2013 1 Crackdown on Liberties That Are Fundamental to Civil Society 4 Judicial Authorities Lend a Hand in Reining in Online Speech & Media 7 Bold Reprisals & Violence Against Human Rights Lawyers 10 Reprisals Against Activists Seeking Participation 12 in UN Human Rights Reviews New Leaders Follow Old Patterns 14 Recommendations 15 Notes 17 Index of Chinese Human Rights Defenders Whose Cases CHRD 25 Reported or Documented in 2013 Cover: Chinese citizens inspired by the “New Citizens’ Movement” () took to the streets in 2013 to rally for anti-corruption measures, calling on top government officials to disclose their personal wealth. “2013 saw the harshest suppression of civil society in over a decade…with human rights and rule of law basically going backwards. Still, the drive in Chinese civil society to keep fighting under difficult and dangerous conditions is the most important asset for promoting human rights and democratization in the country.” - Teng Biao, Chinese human rights lawyer Introduction: Defining Features of 2013 Human rights defenders in China experienced a tumultuous year of government suppression, yet they continued to demonstrate remarkable strength and extraordinary courage.1 In interviews and discussions conducted by Chinese Human Rights Defenders (CHRD), dozens of Chinese activists describe 2013 as the worst year for human rights since at least 2008, which saw severe crackdowns on civil liberties around the Beijing Olympics and with the Charter 08 campaign for reform.
    [Show full text]
  • Falling Short Olympic Promises Go Unfulfilled As China Falters on Press Freedom
    Falling Short Olympic Promises Go Unfulfilled as China Falters on Press Freedom A special report of the Committee to Protect Journalists Updated and reissued June 2008 Founded in 1981, the Committee to Protect Journalists responds to attacks on the press worldwide. CPJ documents hundreds of cases every year and takes action on behalf of journalists and news organizations without regard to po- litical ideology. To maintain its independence, CPJ accepts no government funding. CPJ is funded entirely by private contributions from individuals, foundations, and corporations. Falling Short: Olympic Promises Go Unfulfilled as China Falters on Press Freedom Updated Edition Editorial Director: Bill Sweeney Deputy Editor: Lauren Wolfe Designer: Justin Goldberg Copy Editor: Barbara Ross Proofreader: Sebastian Dettman Cover photo credits: Clockwise from top left: newspaper reader (European Pressphoto Agency); police officer (Reuters); camera operator (Associated Press); flags (Reuters); scaffolding (European Pressphoto Agency); Olympic flame (European Press- photo Agency). Back cover: photographers (Associated Press). © 2008 Committee to Protect Journalists, New York All rights reserved. Printed by United Book Press in the United States of America. BOARD OF DIRECTORS Honorary Co-Chairman Chairman Honorary Co-Chairman Executive Director Walter Cronkite Paul E. Steiger Terry Anderson Joel Simon DIRECTORS Andrew Alexander Gwen Ifill Clarence Page Franz Allina Jane Kramer Norman Pearlstine Christiane Amanpour David Laventhol Dan Rather Dean Baquet David Marash Gene Roberts Rajiv Chandrasekaran Kati Marton Sandra Mims Rowe Sheila Coronel Michael Massing Diane Sawyer Josh Friedman Geraldine Fabrikant Metz Paul C. Tash Anne Garrels Victor Navasky Mark Whitaker James C. Goodale Andres Oppenheimer Brian Williams Cheryl Gould Burl Osborne Matthew Winkler Charlayne Hunter-Gault Charles L.
    [Show full text]
  • China – Liaoning – Democratic Party
    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: CHN17536 Country: China Date: 22 September 2005 Keywords: China – Liaoning – Democratic Party This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Question Please provide any information about the “Democratic Party” (or similar name). List of Sources Consulted Internet Sources: Government Information & Reports Immigration and Refugee Board of Canada http://www.irb.gc.ca/cgi- bin/foliocgi.exe/refinfo_e UK Home Office http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk US Department of State http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk United Nations (UN) UNHCR http://www.unhcr.ch/cgi-bin/texis/vtx/home Non-Government Organisations Amnesty International http://www.amnesty.org/ Human Rights Watch http://www.hrw.org/ International News & Politics BBC News http://news.bbc.co.uk Boxun News http://www.peacehall.com/ CBS News http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/home/main100.shtml Epoch Times http://english.epochtimes.com/index12.html Los Angeles Times http://www.latimes.com/ NewsMax http://www.newsmax.com/ Region Specific Links Chinese Democratic Party Overseas Exile Brach http://www.cdp1998.org/ Free China Movement http://www.freechina.net/2005/index.htm Information Center for Human Rights and Democracy http://www.hkhkhk.com/ UK Branch of China Democracy Party http://www.ukcdp.co.uk/ Search Engines Google http://www.google.com.au/ UNHCR REFWORLD UNHCR Refugee Information Online Databases: Public FACTIVA Reuters Business Briefing DIMIA BACIS Country Information REFINFO IRBDC Research Responses (Canada) RRT ISYS RRT Country Research database, including Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, US Department of State Country Reports on Human Rights Practices.
    [Show full text]
  • China Rights Forum Index for 2003
    China Rights Forum Index for 2003 2004 .1, INDEX BY AUTHOR NO B Ibid. “Civil Society” No. 3, 2003. L Becquelin, Nicolas. “More than Half Mea- Ibid. “CSR Makes the Agenda in Beijing” Leftwich, Charles. “Interview with Liu Hong- sure Needed on Migrants” No. 1, 2003. No. 1, 2003. bin: Words-The Liberating Prison” No. C Ibid. “Funding the Rule of Law and Civil 4, 2003. Cai, Jiquan “Prisoner Profile: Mu Chuan- Society” No. 3, 2003. Leung, Ka Lun. “Cultural Christians and heng” No. 1, 2003. Ibid. “In Custody: A list of prisoners in cus- Contemporary Christianity in China” Ibid. “Prisoner Profile: Zhao Changqing” tody for labor-related activities” No. 1, No. 4, 2003 RIGHTS FORUM No. 2, 2003. 2003. Li, Xiaorong. “Book Review: Chinese Culture Ibid. “Prisoner Profile: Yang Jianli” No. 3, Ibid. “In Custody: People imprisoned for and Human Rights by Marina Svensson CHINA 2003. counterrevolutionary and state security and Stephen Angle” No. 3, 2003. Ibid. “Prisoner Profile: Zheng Enchong” crimes” No. 2, 2003. Liang, Sharon. “Walking the Tightrope: Civil 87 No. 4, 2003.. Ibid. “In Custody: A list of prisoners in cus- Society Organizations in China” No. 2, Ching, Frank. “Book Review: David Zweig’s tody for journalistic activities” No. 3, 2003. Internationalizing China: Domestic Inter- 2003. Lin, Paul. “China’s Special Democratic ests and Global Linkages” No. 1, 2003. Ibid. “In Custody: A list of prisoners in cus- Zone” No. 3, 2003. TURES Chen, Albert. “The Limit of Official Toler- tody for religious activities” No. 4, Liu Hongbin. “On the Poet, Poetry and ance: The Case of the Aizhi Action Pro- 2003.
    [Show full text]