Boletim O Periódico Oficial Da Anesthesia Patient Safety

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Boletim O Periódico Oficial Da Anesthesia Patient Safety —TRADUÇÃO DO INGLÊS SOLICITADA PELA ANESTHESIA PATIENT SAFETY FOUNDATION— APSF.ORG BOLETIM O PERIÓDICO OFICIAL DA ANESTHESIA PATIENT SAFETY FOUNDATIONMais de 1 milhão de leitores por ano no mundo todo Vol. 4 Nº 2 Edição brasileira JUNHO DE 2021 Recentemente, a Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF) estabeleceu uma parceria com a Sociedade de Anestesiologia do Estado de São Paulo (SAESP) e com a Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) para criar e distribuir o Boletim da APSF no Brasil. A meta conjunta é continuar melhorando a educação em segurança perioperatória do paciente e trocar ideias internacionalmente sobre segurança do paciente em anestesia. Além do inglês, publicamos o boletim em várias outras línguas, como japonês, francês, chinês e espanhol. Faremos o possível para enriquecer ainda mais o conteúdo no futuro. Mark A. Warner, MD Dr. Augusto Takashima Dra. Rita de Cássia Rodrigues Presidente Diretor Presidente Presidente Anesthesia Patient Sociedade Brasileira Sociedade de Anestesiologia Safety Foundation de Anestesiologia do Estado de São Paulo Dr. Luiz Fernando Falcão Dr. Fábio de Vasconcelos Papa Dra. Maria Angela Tardelli Dr. Marcos Antonio Costa Diretor Científico Sociedade de Diretor de Relações Internacionais Diretora Científica de Albuquerque Anestesiologia do Estado de São Paulo Sociedade de Anestesiologia Sociedade Brasileira Diretor Vice-Presidente Diretor de Relações Internacionais do Estado de São Paulo de Anestesiologia Sociedade Brasileira Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia de Anestesiologia Representantes editoriais dos EUA da edição brasileira do Boletim da APSF: Steven Greenberg, MD, Jennifer Banayan, MD Edward Bittner, MD, PhD FCCP, FCCM Editora, Boletim da APSF Editor Associado, Boletim da APSF Editor, Boletim da APSF Professora Associada, Professor Associado, Anestesia, Professor Departamento de Anestesiologia, Harvard Medical School Departamento de Anestesiologia/Medicina Northwestern University Departamento de Anestesiologia, Intensiva da University of Chicago, Chicago, Feinberg School of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Illinois, EUA. Chicago, Illinois, EUA. Boston, MA, EUA. Vice-Diretor em Educação do Departamento de Anestesiologia da NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston, Illinois, EUA. BOLETIM DA APSF Junho de 2021 PÁGINA 31 Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation Patrocinador-fundador (US$ 340.000) American Society of Anesthesiologists (asahq.org) Integrantes do Conselho Consultivo Corporativo de 2021 (vigente desde 31 de março de 2021) Platina (US$ 50.000) Ouro (US$ 30.000) Blink Device ICU Medical Medtronic Company (icumedical.com) (medtronic.com) (blinkdc.com) Acacia Pharma GE Healthcare Edwards Merck Preferred Physicians (acaciapharma.com) (gehealthcare.com) Lifesciences (merck.com) Medical Risk (edwards.com) Retention Group (ppmrrg.com) Prata (US$ 10.000) Bronze (US$ 5.000) Fresenius Kabi Masimo Senzime Ambu Codonics Dräger Frank Moya Educational Programs (fresenius-kabi.us) (masimo.com) Medasense Respiratory Motion, Inc. Smiths Medical Oferecemos nosso especial reconhecimento e agradecimento à Medtronic por seu apoio e financiamento da APSF/Medtronic Patient Safety Research Grant (Bolsa de pesquisa para a segurança do paciente) (US$ 150.000,00); à Doctor's Company Foundation por seu apoio e financiamento do APSF Patient Safety Prototype Development Project (Projeto de desenvolvimento do protótipo de segurança do paciente da APSF) (US$ 100.000,00); e à Merck por sua bolsa de estudo. Para obter mais informações sobre como a sua organização pode apoiar a missão da APSF e participar do Conselho Consultivo Corporativo de 2021, acesse apsf.org ou entre em contato com Sara Moser pelo e-mail [email protected]. Doadores da comunidade (abrange Organizações de Especialidades, Grupos de Anestesia, Sociedades Estaduais e Indivíduos) Organizações Sociedades Estaduais US$ 5.000 a US$ 14.999 Lynn Reede, CRNA Allen N. Gustin, MD Adam Setren, MD de Especialidades Sra. Isabel Arnone (em memória US$ 5.000 a US$ 14.999 Daniel I. Sessler, MD, e Ximena Gary Haynes, MD, PhD, FASA Emily Sharpe, MD de Lawrence J. Arnone, MD, FACA) Sessler, MD e Debra Haynes US$ 5.000 a US$ 14.999 Simanonok Charitable Giving Fund Minnesota Society Robert Bode, Jr., MD Ty Slatton, MD John F. Heath, MD of Anesthesiologists Michael D. Sparkuhl, MD, FACS American Academy of Dr. Eric e Marjorie Ho Marjorie Stiegler, MD Michael Hofkamp Anesthesiologist Assistants Tennessee Society James F. Szocik, MD Mary Ellen e Mark A. Warner Robert K. Stoelting, MD Steven K. Howard, MD of Anesthesiologists Joseph W. Szokol, MD (em US$ 2.000 a US$ 4.999 Thomas L. Warren, MD (em memória Dr. e Sra. Donald C. Tyler Jeffrey Huang, MD US$ 2.000 a US$ 4.999 de Ursula Dyer, MD) homenagem a Steven Greenberg, MD) Society of Academic Associations Ken Johnson of Anesthesiology and Connecticut State Society US$ 2.000 a US$ 4.999 US$ 200 a US$ 749 Brian J. Thomas, JD (em homenagem of Anesthesiologists Rebecca L. Johnson, MD a Matthew B. Weinger, MD) Perioperative Medicine Robert Caplan, MD Arnoley Abcejo, MD Massachusetts Society Ann Kinsey, CRNA Ellen e Butch Thomas The Academy of Anesthesiology Jeffrey B. Cooper, PhD Aalok Agarwala, MD, MBA of Anesthesiologists Goral Krishna, MD Laurence e Lynn Torsher US$ 750 a US$ 1.999 Susan E. Dorsch, MD Shane Angus, AA-C Michigan Society Marilyn L. Barton (em memória Laurence A. Lang, MD Steven Greenberg, MD Benjamin D. Unger, MD American Society of Dentist of Anesthesiologists de Darrell Barton) Michael C. Lewis, MD, FASA (em Anesthesiologists James J. Lamberg, DO Gregory Unruh Wisconsin Society William A. Beck, MD homenagem a David Birnbach, MD) Society for Airway Management of Anesthesiologists Joshua Lea, CRNA (em homenagem Della M. Lin, MD Richard D. Urman, MD, MBA (em David e Samantha Bernstein homenagem a Jeffrey Cooper, PhD) Society for Pediatric Anesthesia a Maria van Pelt, PhD, CRNA) (em homenagem a Jeff Cooper) Robert Littlehale, MD US$ 750 a US$ 1.999 Bruce Van Dop Grupos de Anestesia Patty Mullen Reilly, CRNA K. Page Branam, MD (em memória Dr. Martin London Arizona Society of Anesthesiologists Joyce Wahr, MD de Donna M. Holder, MD) Andrea Vannucci, MD US$ 15.000 ou mais Edwin Mathews, MD Florida Society of Anesthesiologists Graham W Bullard Matthew B. Weinger, MD US$750 a US$ 1.999 Stacey Maxwell US Anesthesia Partners Georgia Society of Anesthesioloigsts Bonnie e John Burkert Donald E. Arnold, MD, FASA Gregory McComas, MD Andrew Weisinger US$ 5.000 a US$ 14.999 Illinois Society of Anesthesiologists Matthew W Caldwell Douglas R. Bacon, MD, MA James P. McMichael, MD (em Gina Whitney, MD Associated Anesthesiologists, Iowa Society of Anesthesiologists (em homenagem a Mark Warner) Michael Caldwell memória de Howard Zauder, MD) G. Edwin Wilson, MD Pensilvânia Nebraska Society Douglas Bartlett (em memória Alexander Chaikin Emily Methangkool, MD Richard N. Wissler (em memória de Diana Davidson, CRNA) North American Partners of Anesthesiologists, Inc. Marlene V. Chua, MD Jonathan Metry de Jerry Modell) in Anesthesia Allison Bechtel Ohio Society of Anesthesiologists Heather Ann Columbano Tricia Meyer, PharmD Cynthia A. Wong (em homenagem NorthStar Anesthesia Casey D. Blitt, MD Oregon Society of Anesthesiologists Jeremy Cook, MD Michael D. Miller, MD a Jeffrey Cooper) Fred Cheney, MD US$ 2.000 a US$ 4.999 South Carolina Society John K. DesMarteau, MD Sara Moser (em homenagem Jennifer Woodbury of Anesthesiologists Daniel J. Cole, MD Madison Anesthesiology Andrew E. Dick, MD a Matthew B. Weinger, MD) Arpad Zolyomi Consultants, LLP Texas Society of Anesthesiologists Karen B. Domino, MD Christine Doyle Rashmi Mueller (em memória de Sigurdur S. TeamHealth Kenneth Elmassian, DO, FASA Richard P. Dutton, MD, MBA Drs. Michael e Georgia Olympio Legacy Society Sigurdsson, MD) (em memória de Dr. Archie Attarian) https://www.apsf.org/ US$ 750 a US$ 1.999 Thomas Ebert, MD Ducu Onisei, MD US$ 200 a US$ 749 David M. Gaba, MD e Deanna Mann Dr. Fredrick Orkin donate/legacy-society/ Anesthesia Associates of Columbus, Mike Edens e Katie Megan Arkansas Society Beverly e Marty Greenberg (em Amy Pearson, MD Dan e Cristine Cole Pensilvânia homenagem a Dr. Steven Greenberg) Steven B. Edelstein, MD, FASA of Anesthesiologists Karma e Jeffrey Cooper Anesthesia Consultants of Athens, Mary Ann e Jan Ehrenwerth, MD Michele Pelot, MD Colorado Society Alexander Hannenberg, MD LLP (em homenagem a Albert (em memória de Charles Cowles, MD) Lee S. Perrin, MD Dr. John H. e Sra. Marsha Eichhorn of Anesthesiologists (em homenagem a Mark A. Warner) Santora, MD) James English Paul Pomerantz Burton A. Dole, Jr. Mississippi Society Catherine Kuhn, MD NorthShore University Health System Bola Faloye, MD of Anesthesiologists Meghan Lane-Fall, MD, MSHP Cathleen Price David Gaba, MD e Deanna Mann CRNA School (em homenagem ao Thomas R Farrell, MD Dr. Joseph Szokol) New Jersey Society Lorri A. Lee, MD Richard Prielipp, MD Drs. Alex e Carol Hannenberg of Anesthesiologists Jeffrey Feldman, MD Mark C. Norris, MD Sheila Riazi Drs. Joy L. Hawkins e Randall M. Clark US$ 200 a US$ 749 New Mexico Society John Fiadjoe (em memória Frank Overdyk, MD Drew Rodgers (em homenagem Dr. Eric e Marjorie Ho Children's of Alabama (em of Anesthesiologists de Rhonda Alexis) a Stan Strickland, MD) May Pian-Smith, MD, MS (em Drs. Michael e Georgia Olympio homenagem a Jennifer Dollar, MD) Virginia Society of Anesthesiologists Steven Frank homenagem a Jeffrey Cooper, PhD) David Rotberg, MD Hawkeye Anesthesia, PLLC Ronald George, MD Dr. Ephraim S. (Rick) e Eileen Siker Indivíduos Gianna Pino Casini Steven Sanford, JD Robert K. Stoelting, MD UNC Student College of James S Gessner, MD Brad e Allison Schneider (em Clinical Pharmacy US$ 15.000 ou mais Elizabeth Rebello, MD (em homenagem aos Drs. Mark Warner Ian J. Gilmour, MD homenagem ao Dr. Steven Greenberg) Mary Ellen e Mark Warner Wichita Anesthesiology Chartered Steven J. Barker, MD, PhD e Jerome Adams) Linda K. Groah Scott Segal Matthew B. Weinger, MD, e Lisa Price Nota: Doações são sempre bem-vindas. Faça sua doação on-line (https://www.apsf.org/donate/) ou por correspondência para APSF, P.O. Box 6668, Rochester, MN 55903, EUA.
Recommended publications
  • The Critical Importance of Expert Statistical Input
    Sent to the Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet 18 August 2020 A proposal to enhance Australia’s capability to manage epidemics The critical importance of expert statistical input 1 2 Nicholas Fisher and Dennis Trewin Executive summary Given the high level of global mobility, pandemics are likely to be more frequent, and with potentially devastating consequences for the Australian community and its way of life. Whilst parts of Australia are experiencing a second wave of COVID-19, the country is in relatively better shape than most others. The number of people who have died or been seriously ill as a consequence of the virus, whilst tragically high, is nonetheless comparable with most of the best-performing countries. That said, we believe there is a critical need for strategic statistical oversight of the whole process of anticipating, managing and learning from the current pandemic to improve the quantitative information and advice provided to policy makers. This proposal outlines quantitative aspects of a plan to enable Australia to deal more efficiently and effectively with future such events, thus enhancing both the social and the economic welfare of its people. Indeed, expeditious action may well assist materially in managing possible future waves of the current pandemic, and its aftermath. A dispassionate assessment of Australia’s health and economic response to the pandemic over the last six months reveals some very significant inadequacies in the data, statistical analysis and interpretation used to guide Australia’s preparations and actions. Data to answer some of the most basic of questions about prevalence in population have not been available and remain unavailable.
    [Show full text]
  • National Covid-19 Coordination Commission (Nccc)
    25th May 2020 Senator Katy Gallagher, Chair Select Committee on COVID-19 ℅ Committee Secretary Dear Senator Gallagher and Members of the Select Committee on Covid-19, I am writing to the Select Committee on COVID-19 as an Australian citizen. I have focussed my submission on my concerns regarding potential financial conflicts of interest in the Australian Government’s Covid-19 advisors. Please note that this submission contains excerpts from an extensive report I have published, entitled ‘Covid-19: Plandemic Profit.Fallout1.’ NATIONAL COVID-19 COORDINATION COMMISSION (NCCC) EXECUTIVE BOARD In March 2020, Prime Minister Scott Morrison announced the creation of the ‘National Covid-19 Coordination Commission (NCCC). “An Executive Board of Commissioners, will advise the Prime Minister on all non-health aspects of the pandemic response… [the Board will] coordinate advice to the Australian Government on actions to anticipate and mitigate the economic and social effects of the global coronavirus pandemic…. This is about working cooperatively across private-to-private and public-to-private networks to unlock resources…”2 Upon examination, the Board Members of the NCCC do not appear to represent the interests of small business or ‘everyday Australians’. Instead, they hold senior board positions of companies in mining, oil and gas, airlines, private hospitals, pharmaceutical companies, casinos and superannuation giants. One member is a billionaire. Another was recently accused for being ‘an international tax dodger’ by an Australian Senator. Another Chairs an international organisation at the forefront of brokering private-public partnerships and garnering billions in taxpayer dollars to fund Covid-19 vaccine development. The Morrison Government’s choice of NCCC board members, and the glaring omission of any member who could be said to represent small business or employee unions, is a farcical premise of ‘mitigating the economic and social effects’ of Covid-10.
    [Show full text]
  • Frequently Asked Questions About the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Impact on Funding Arrangements
    Frequently asked questions about the Coronavirus (COVID-19) impact on funding arrangements The following questions and answers have been developed by the Department of Social Services (the department) to assist funded service providers (and prospective organisations) in service delivery arrangements in light of the Coronavirus (COVID-19). There will be evolving information and guidance provided by government and we encourage you seek up to date information. Please contact your Funding Arrangement Manager in the first instance to discuss your individual circumstances and to find a flexible solution. You can contact them using the emails below: State / Territory Email address Queensland [email protected] New South Wales [email protected] Australian Capital Territory [email protected] Victoria [email protected] Tasmania [email protected] South Australia [email protected] Western Australia [email protected] Northern Territory [email protected] If you are unable to contact your Funding Arrangement Manager, please contact the Community Grants Hotline via telephone 1800 020 283 (option 6), or TTY 1800 555 677. Questions and Answers General questions ........................................................................................................................ 2 Funding arrangements already in place ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmaus20 Digital Forum Summary Report Medicines Australia About Pharmaus20
    PharmAus20 Digital Forum Summary Report Medicines Australia About PharmAus20 PharmAus20 is Medicines Australia’s fourth annual Policy Symposium. Every year the Symposium provides a platform for an open discussion between industry experts and policymakers, with the goal of improving the future of healthcare in Australia. Usually held over one action packed day in Canberra, this year’s Symposium was held virtually over four sessions. The discussions focused on the lessons from COVID-19 and what they will mean for the future of innovation in the health and pharmaceuticals sector. PharmAus20 explored the impacts of COVID-19 on industry, patients, communities, and governments. The key presentations explored the COVID-19 lessons from international leaders on industry and government collaboration; how we can improve Australia’s whole of ecosystem approach to Research and Development; what COVID means for the long term trajectory of digital within the industry; and how the industry can help Australia recover from the economic impacts of the pandemic. The Symposium flagged what COVID-19 induced changes have meant for patients, and how the industry can ensure Australia is better prepared for the next crisis and the next stage of recovery. Over the course of the four weeks, 23 speakers, including the Federal Minister for Health, the Shadow Minister for Health and various stakeholders from the health sector offered their perspectives on what COVID-19 has meant for the medicines industry. The key ideas and themes that emerged from speakers and discussions at PharmAus20 are summarised in the pages below. 2 Key themes Heading 1 2 It takes the whole The industry has ecosystem to bring responded well to innovative COVID-19, but the treatments to journey is not over patients 3 4 Industry Consumers are reform plays a demanding the key role in ensuring industry integrates Australia’s economy digital offerings fares better than others 3 Overview Medicines Australia hosted PharmAus20 over four economy.
    [Show full text]
  • The COVID-19-Crisis and the Information Polity: an Overview of Responses and Discussions in Twenty-One Countries from Six Continents
    Information Polity 25 (2020) 243–274 243 DOI 10.3233/IP-200006 IOS Press Global Expert Report The COVID-19-crisis and the information polity: An overview of responses and discussions in twenty-one countries from six continents Albert Meijera and C. William R. Websterb aUtrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands bUniversity of Stirling, Scotland, UK Contributing Authors Frank Bannister, Colin J. Bennett, Kaiping Chen, Heungsuk Choi, J. Ignacio Criado, Maria Alexandra Cunha, Mehmet Akif Demircioglu, Mila Gasco-Hernandez, Paul Henman, Douglas Kimemia, Veiko Lember, Karl Löfgren, Luis F. Luna-Reyes, Albert Meijer, Ines Mergel, David Murakami Wood, Giorgia Nesti, Erico Przeybilovicz, Aarthi Raghavan, Ola Svenonius, Rosamunde van Brakel, William Webster, Mete Yildiz. Abstract. Governments around the world are utilizing data and information systems to manage the COVID-19-crisis. To obtain an overview of all these efforts, this global report presents the expert reports of 21 countries regarding the relation between the COVID-19-crisis and the information polity. A comparative analysis of these reports highlights that governments focus on strengthening six functions: management of information for crisis management, publishing public information for citizens, providing digital services to citizens, monitoring citizens in public space, facilitating information exchange between citizens and developing innovative responses to COVID-19. The comparative overview of information responses to the COVID-19-crisis shows that these responses cannot only be studied from a rational perspective on government information strategies but need to be studied as political and symbolic interventions. Keywords: COVID-19, information polity, corona app, corona dashboard 1. Introduction The COVID-19 Pandemic has diffused globally at an alarming rate and has forced countries to undertake a broad range of unprecedented interventions in order to protect their citizens from this disease.
    [Show full text]
  • Guiding Our Community Groups on How to Be COVID Safe
    BENTLEIGH BENTLEIGH EAST GUIDING OUR BRIGHTON EAST CARNEGIE COMMUNITY GROUPS CAULFIELD ELSTERNWICK GARDENVALE ON HOW TO BE GLEN HUNTLY MCKINNON COVID SAFE MURRUMBEENA ORMOND PLANNING Ι SUPPORTING Ι COMMUNITY Ι SAFETY ST KILDA EAST Guidance for community groups to be COVID safe This guide has been developed to assist community groups who use Council facilities to be COVID safe. All community groups using Council facilities, are required to develop and implement a COVID-19 Safe Plan. This guide includes a Safe Plan template for you to use and should be completed prior to starting any community activities and be available to volunteers and members during activities. The COVID-19 Safe Plan sets out six essential focus areas to help your community group safely restart activities as COVID-19 restrictions ease. All community groups are encouraged to stay informed by visiting the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Victoria website https://www.coronavirus.vic.gov.au for advice on current restrictions, how to stay safe and the latest updates. Remember, you don’t need to rush — it is best to develop your plan at a pace that supports the safety and needs of your group. Focus area one: keeping up-to-date This focus area will help your community group stay informed of government directives and official COVID-19 information as the situation evolves and changes. Your COVID-19 Safe Plan should: • Identify a person who will be the key communication point and authority on COVID-19 information for your community group. • Explain how your community group will stay informed about the latest information available from State and Federal Governments regarding COVID-19 restrictions.
    [Show full text]
  • May 2021 Monitoring International Trends
    Monitoring International Trends May 2021 The NBA monitors international developments that may influence the management of blood and blood products in Australia. Our focus is on: Potential new product developments and applications; Global regulatory and blood practice trends; Events that may have an impact on global supply, demand and pricing, such as changes in company structure, capacity, organisation and ownership; and Other emerging risks that could put financial or other pressures on the Australian sector. Highlights include: Research and development in the health sector, and clinical trials, continue to have a strong focus on pandemic related matters, although other issues are receiving more attention than a year ago. Professional societies are holding virtual conferences and annual meetings. Some developments in treating blood disorders (hereditary angioedema, paroxysmal nocturnal haemoglobinuria, and haemophilia) are described on page 3. Hereditary angioedema patients in the United States, the European Union and Japan now have the option of oral prophylaxis rather than injection or infusion. Researchers reinforced the view that the use of tranexamic acid in hip and knee arthroplasties could reduce blood transfusions (page 3). Others found that intravenous immunoglobulin did not relieve the pain of idiopathic small fibre neuropathy (page 4). Some scientists are estimating the life of antibodies in people who have had a COVID-19 infection (page 4), others are trialling the efficacy of monoclonal antibodies in treating the disease (pages 4 and 5), and there is interest in what is termed “long COVID” (page 4). With a number of COVID-19 vaccines in large-scale use, discussion continues about their effectiveness against a variety of variants, their possible side effects, whether they should be used sequentially in the same patients, how much they permit break-through infection, whether they prevent disease transmission to others, how long the immunity they produce will last and whether boosters will be required (pages 6 to 9).
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Pandemic Preparedness: Lessons from COVID-19
    Independent Task Force Report No. 78 Improving Pandemic Preparedness Lessons From COVID-19 Sylvia Mathews Burwell and Frances Fragos Townsend, Chairs Thomas J. Bollyky and Stewart M. Patrick, Project Directors Independent Task Force Report No. 78 Improving Pandemic Preparedness Lessons From COVID-19 Sylvia Mathews Burwell and Frances Fragos Townsend, Chairs Thomas J. Bollyky and Stewart M. Patrick, Project Directors The Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) is an independent, nonpartisan membership organization, think tank, and publisher dedicated to being a resource for its members, government officials, business executives, journalists, educators and students, civic and religious leaders, and other interested citizens in order to help them better understand the world and the foreign policy choices facing the United States and other countries. Founded in 1921, CFR carries out its mission by maintaining a diverse membership, with special programs to promote interest and develop expertise in the next generation of foreign policy leaders; convening meetings at its headquarters in New York and in Washington, DC, and other cities where senior government officials, members of Congress, global leaders, and prominent thinkers come together with Council members to discuss and debate major international issues; supporting a Studies Program that fosters independent research, enabling CFR scholars to produce articles, reports, and books and hold roundtables that analyze foreign policy issues and make concrete policy recommendations; publishing Foreign Affairs, the preeminent journal on international affairs and U.S. foreign policy; sponsoring Independent Task Forces that produce reports with both findings and policy prescriptions on the most important foreign policy topics; and providing up-to- date information and analysis about world events and American foreign policy on its website, CFR.org.
    [Show full text]
  • How the COVID-19 Policy Response Let Down Australians
    Analysis Paper 18 December 2020 Victims of failure – how the COVID-19 policy response let down Australians Monica Wilkie Victims of failure – how the COVID-19 policy response let down Australians Monica Wilkie Analysis Paper 18 Contents Executive Summary ...............................................................................................1 Introduction ..........................................................................................................2 Box 1: You cannot criticise that! ..................................................................3 Analysing the policy response .................................................................................4 Were restrictions adequately justified? ..............................................................4 Box 2: Australia’s COVID-19 Modelling .........................................................5 Box 3: Liberty dies in COVID .......................................................................6 Victoria: An inflexible, political virus response ....................................................6 No Exit: Suppression vs. Elimination ........................................................................7 Exit Stage App ..............................................................................................8 Trade-Offs: The economy, mental health, vs. COVID-19 ..............................................9 Accountability ..................................................................................................... 11 Accountability failure
    [Show full text]
  • GRATTAN Institute
    GRATTAN Institute The course of COVID-19 in Australia Submission to the Senate Inquiry into the Australian Government's response to the COVID-19 pandemic June 2020 Stephen Duckett, Hal Swerissen, Will Mackey, Anika Stobart and Hugh Parsonage Grattan Institute 2020 1 Overview The SARS-CoV-2 virus (coronavirus) galvanised a public health shutdowns, and the need for vigilance and swift responses to response not seen in Australia for more than a century. To prevent its outbreaks. spread, and the disease it causes, COVID-19, social and economic activity was shut down. Australia emerged with low numbers of Choices are being made about how and when the lockdown will be deaths, and a health system which coped with the outbreak. eased, with each state and territory taking a different path. While the virus continues to circulate, there will be a risk of a second wave. Australia’s response passed through four stages – containment, reassurance amid uncertainty, cautious incrementalism, and then In this report we describe a model developed at Grattan Institute escalated national action – as the gathering storm of the pandemic which simulates the risks of different relaxation strategies, and we became more apparent. draw some lessons for the health system. We show that some strategies, such as reopening schools, involve some risk of There were four key successes in the response: cooperative outbreaks, but these outbreaks most likely can be controlled. We governance informed by experts (most notably seen in the highlight those strategies which are riskier, particularly reopening establishment of the National Cabinet), closure of international large workplaces.
    [Show full text]
  • Covid-19 Under Democracy and Autocracy
    © Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey (New Brunswick) This publication is the work of the Spring 2021 Capstone class of the United Nations and Global Policy Studies Master of Arts program (UNMA), Political Science Department, Rutgers University (New Brunswick) June 2021 Application for permission to reproduce or translate all or any part of this publication should be made to: UNMA Secretariat Hickman Hall 89 George Street New Brunswick, NJ 08901 Email: [email protected] Title: Covid-19 Under Democracy and Autocracy Editor: Dr. Roland Rich Cover Design: Ian DeFalco Layout: Camilla Bober ISBN 978-0-578-92527-1 CONTENTS Contributors 1 Chapter 1 A Project is Born 4 Roland Rich Chapter 2 Australia’s Covid-19 Response: 10 The Achilles Heel Shahinaz Abdelhamid Chapter 3 Brazil: Negligence and Populism during 34 a Global Health Crisis Gabriela Casco Chapter 4 Cuba’s Vaunted Medical System Faces Covid-19 54 Javier Nino Chapter 5 Federalism, the EU, and Human Rights 68 in Germany under COVID-19 Camilla Bober Chapter 6 Russia: A Contest between Science and Denial 94 Amar Wason Chapter 7 South Africa Faces Covid-19 116 Delaney Charydczak Chapter 8 Taiwan: A Near Perfect Response 128 to the Coronavirus Pandemic Ryan Prieto Chapter 9 The Impact of Covid-19 on Elections 148 in Uganda Susan Ombwayo Chapter 10 The United Kingdom: Covid-19 162 and the Decay of Democracy Arsanious Hanna Chapter 11 Vietnam: Looking beyond Regime Type 182 Daphnée A.M. Fleurant Chapter 12 Conclusions, Constatations and Concerns 196 Roland Rich Bibliography 224 1 CONTRIBUTORS Shahinaz Abdelhamid received her B.S.
    [Show full text]
  • New York City Iot Strategy
    March 2021 IoT Strategy The New York City Internet of Things Strategy nyc.gov/cto 1 First published March 4th, 2021 Version File version 1.26.0402 Type Typeset in Libre Baskerville and Public Sans, with accents of Space Mono. Online nyc.gov/cto nyc.gov/assets/cto/#/project/iot-strategy Acknowledgments The NYC IoT Strategy builds upon research and publications prepared by former colleagues in the Mayor’s Office of the Chief Technology Officer. NYC CTO would like to acknowledge their contributions, and to recognize the agency partners and diverse range of stakeholders who shared their expertise and perspectives in the development of this document. Note The NYC IoT Strategy is subject to applicable laws, rules, and regulations, including City procurement rules and processes. The City reserves all rights, including rights to postpone, cancel, or amend the IoT Strategy at any time. The City shall not be liable for any costs incurred in connection with the IoT Strategy. Message from the CTO Each decade brings change. Often, that includes the introduction of new technologies into our lives and lexicons. The 2020s will be a critical decade for the billions of internet-connected devices commonly known as the Internet of Things, or “IoT” for short. Smarter homes, smarter services, and smarter cities. These advances – ranging from wearable health bands to self-monitoring factory equipment to pedestrian counters in parks – bring the potential for new jobs, a higher quality of life, and a climate-friendlier Big Apple. In this decade, society is poised to unlock these and countless other benefits from IoT.
    [Show full text]