DOCSLIB.ORG

Winds of Change the Newsletter of The

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Winds of Change the Newsletter of The Winds of Change the newsletter of the June 2010 Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition E Huntington, WV www.ohvec.org Victory! Passing Stronger Cemetery Legislation by Robin Blakeman operations and other land-altering After at least three years of activities. trying to more effectively protect During our first three years cemeteries, we finally did it! This year, of work, four separate bills were at OVEC’s urging, citizens and introduced; none resulted in new members of the faith community joined legislation, but all increased elected forces in lobbying for the passage of officials’ awareness of the need to HB 4457, which improves cemetery protect cemeteries. protection throughout West Virginia. We built allies within faith Our efforts to protect community groups and other cemeteries were sparked by an organizations, such as genealogical increasing number of reports of societies and the WV Perpetual cemetery desecration and blocked Care Cemetery Board. Prominent access to family cemeteries. representatives from Catholic, Many of the access and Episcopalian, Methodist, Unitarian desecration complaints are related to and Presbyterian faith groups lent mountaintop removal operations, but support. For the past two years, there are statewide problems with the WV Council of Churches has protecting cemeteries from natural gas endorsed the need for improved cemetery protection Anderson “Devil Anse” legislation in its legislative Supreme Court Pilot Project Approved Hatfield’s grave is just one policy guide. of hundreds in WV by Carol Warren During the 2009 overshadowed by MTR Coalition partners of WV Citizens for Clean WV legislative interims, a Elections were very encouraged when Governor Manchin mining operations (center announced in his State of the State address that he planned background). continued on page 4 to offer legislation to establish a public financing pilot project for both Supreme Court seats to be filled in 2012. Please donate to the WV Council The proposal was a result of recommendations by of Churches Montcoal Mining continued on page 9 Disaster Fund to help the families of the 29 coal miners who died in Inside This Winds of Change the May 5 explosion at a Massey Mourning in the Mountains ....................page 2 Energy mine. Donate online: EPA May Veto Mine ....................page 3 WWW.WVCC.ORG, or mail a check to: Victory at Marsh Fork School! ....................page 14 WVCC, 2207 Washington St. E., Coal-to-Liquids Appealed ....................page 19 Charleston WV, 25311-2218. Groups Meet with OSM ....................page 21 1 Mourning in the Mountain State - Again This op-ed by Denise Giardina ran April 6, 2010, in owner of the Upper Big Branch mine. Massey has a the NEW YORK TIMES history of negligence, and Upper Big Branch has often People in West Virginia had hoped that on been cited in recent years for problems, including failure Monday night we would gather around televisions with to properly vent methane gas, which officials say might family and friends to watch our beloved Mountaineers have been the cause of Monday’s explosion. face Butler in our first chance at the men’s NCAA It seems we can’t escape our heritage. I grew basketball title since 1959. up in a coal camp in the southern part of the state. Every Men working evening shifts in the coal mines day my school bus drove past a sign posted by the local would get to listen thanks to radio coverage piped in coal company keeping tally, like a basketball scoreboard, from the surface. Expectations ran high; even President of “man hours” lost to accidents. From time to time Obama, surveying classmates whose fathers had been killed the Final Four, “I guarantee it: Massey’s already told or maimed would disappear, their families predicted West these guys, ‘Hey, don’t say nothin’. gone elsewhere to seek work. Virginia would win. You’re not talking to no reporters. We knew then, and know now, that we You’re not saying nothin’ about our Then, on are a national sacrifice area. We mine coal safety record – or you won’t have a Tuesday morning, job’ ” - Chuck Nelson, former Massey despite the danger to miners, the damage we would wake to miner and OVEC organizer to the environment and the monomaniacal triumphant headlines control of an industry that keeps economic in sports pages across the country. At last, we would diversity from flourishing here. We do it because America say, something good has happened to West Virginia. The says it needs the coal we provide. whole nation would see us in a new light. And we would West Virginians get little thanks in return. Our cry. miners have historically received little protection, and our Instead, halfway through Saturday night’s politicians remain subservient to Big Coal. Meanwhile, semifinal against Duke, our star forward, Da’Sean Butler, West Virginia is either ignored by the rest of the nation or tore a ligament in his knee, and the Mountaineers is the butt of jokes about ignorant hillbillies. crumbled. And on Monday evening, while Duke and Here in West Virginia we will forget our fleeting Butler played in what for us dream of basketball was now merely a game, “The bad thing here is that Massey owns (the glory and get about the West Virginians gathered Upper Big Branch) mine, and they’ve got a lot business of mourning. It of subsidiaries,” said Denny Tyler, an electrician around televisions to watch is, after all, something who has contracted with Massey and now we do very well. In the news of a coal mine runs endmtr.com. “If you get fired from one, disaster. you’re not working anywhere on Coal River … area around the Upper On Tuesday, the It’s a fear thing.” Big Branch, families of headline in the Charleston the dead will gather in Gazette read instead: Miners Dead, Missing in Raleigh churches and their neighbors will come to pray with them. Explosion. And we cried. They will go home, and the same neighbors will show up Despite the sunny skies and unseasonably warm bearing platters of fried chicken and potato salad and weather, the mood here in southern West Virginia is cakes. The funeral homes will be jammed, the mourners subdued. As of Tuesday afternoon, 25 men have been in their best suits and ties and Sunday dresses. confirmed dead, two are critically injured, and four are And perhaps this time President Obama and missing and presumed dead. Their fellow West Virginians Americans will pay attention, and notice West Virginia at work round the clock and risk their own lives to retrieve last. the bodies. Denise Giardina is one of West Virginia’s best known Already outrage is focused on Massey Energy, authors and an OVEC member. 2 EPA May Veto Largest MTR Mine; Environmental Justice Concerns Cited for First Time in Decision In October 2009, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced plans to veto the Clean Water Act (CWA) permit for the largest mountaintop removal mine in West Virginia, the Spruce No.1 Mine in Logan County. In his Coal Tattoo blog, journalist Ken Ward, Jr., noted, “Environmental groups have been fighting the Spruce Mine since 1998, when it was proposed as a 3,113-acre mine that would bury more than 10 miles of streams in the Pigeonroost Hollow area near Blair.” In 1998 the West Virginia Highlands Conservancy Active Spruce No. 1 Mine on the left, Pigeonroost and Blair residents and OVEC members James and Sibby Hollow on the right. Flyover courtesy SouthWings. Weekley and Carlos Gore (then an OVEC board member) filed the lawsuit that came to be known as Bragg v. vetoing the Spruce permit by issuing its “proposed Robertson. Subsequent years of litigating and organizing determination” to block the CWA permit issued for the have reduced the size of the permit and kept most of the Spruce No. 1 mine by the Army Corps of Engineers. mining from starting. Longtime members of OVEC may The Charleston Gazette reported that the EPA’s recall being asked numerous times to attend hearings or action continues a formal process – including a public comment on this permit comment period and a hearing – that could ultimately lead In March 2010, the EPA took the next step toward to a veto of the mine’s CWA permit, although the process See related story on page 7 could take a year or more. In its 46-page decision and accompanying 33-page technical document, the EPA detailed its concerns about OVEC Board of Directors & Staff the broad-ranging negative impacts of mountaintop removal, Board Members from the burial of streams and downstream pollution to the Marty Amerikaner Ronda Harper destruction of forests and studies linking living near mining Tom Boggs Regina Hendrix, Sec. Jeff Bosley, Chair Thomas Kincaid operations to premature death among Appalachian residents. Victoria Bosley, Treasurer Michael Morrison “And for the first time in a regulatory document, Dr. Rainey Duke Chuck Nelson the EPA cited ‘environmental justice’ concerns about Eric Fout Lee Weidner whether mining unfairly foists negative impacts on low- Larry Gibson Chris Worth income populations in the coalfields,” the Gazette Full- and Part-Time Staff reported. Dianne Bady Janet Keating Vivian Stockman The proposed determination states, “The mountains Maryanne Graham Tonya Adkins Maria Gunnoe being affected by Spruce No. 1 are considered a cultural Stephanie Tyree Carol Warren Robin Blakeman resource by many residents. The mountains influence residents’ daily lives and in many cases have helped define OVEC Webmaster Don Alexander Winds of Change Editors Vivian Stockman, Appalachian society. Removing them may have profound cultural changes on area residents, so it is important that Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition cultural impacts be considered as well.” P.O. Box 6753, Huntington, WV 25773 This is exactly what those of us working to end phone: (304) 522-0246 fax: (304) 522-4079 e-mail: [email protected] web page: www.ohvec.org mountaintop removal have been saying for years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Massey Energy Co
    Case 5:10-cv-00689 Document 83 Filed 03/11/11 Page 1 of 170 PageID #: 1266 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA AT BECKLEY In re MASSEY ENERGY CO. ) Civil Action No. 5: 1 0-cv-00689 SECURITIES LITIGATION ) ) CLASS ACTION ) This Document Relates To: ) The Honorable Irene C. BerBergerg ) ALL ACTIONS Jury Trial Demanded ) CONSOLIDATED AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR VIOLATIONS OF THE FEDERAL SECURITIES LAWS Case 5:10-cv-00689 Document 83 Filed 03/11/11 Page 2 of 170 PageID #: 1267 TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY v I. NATURE AND SUMMARY OF THE ACTION 13 A. Fallout from the 2006 Fire at Massey’s Alma No. 1 Mine 14 B. Massey Created a New Corporate Image to Lure Investors by Purporting to Implement Safety Improvement Initiatives 17 C. Notwithstanding its Purported Safety Improvement Initiatives, Massey Prioritized Production Over Safety During the Class Period, Culminating in the Disaster at Upper Big Branch 18 D. After the Explosion, Criminal and Civil Investigations Revealed Deceptive Tactics Used by Massey to Cover Up its Safety-Last Approach to Coal Mining During the Class Period 20 E. Massey Restates its Critical NFDL Safety Metric and Blankenship Resigns 23 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE 25 III. PARTIES 25 A. Plaintiffs 25 B. Massey 26 C. The Officer Defendants 26 D. The Director Defendants 28 IV. FACTUAL BACKGROUND AND SUBSTANTIVE ALLEGATIONS 32 A. Massey and its Subsidiaries 32 B. Blankenship’s Rise to Power and Reign at Massey 35 C. Before the Class Period, Massey Was Embroiled in Criminal and Civil Litigation Arising from Unlawful Safety Practices in 2006 37 D.
    [Show full text]
  • Alpha Complaint
    Case 2:14-cv-11609 Document 1 Filed 03/05/14 Page 1 of 32 PageID #: 1 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA CHARLESTON DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; the STATE OF WEST ) VIRGINIA by and through the WEST VIRGINIA ) DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; the ) PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ) PROTECTION; and the COMMONWEALTH OF ) KENTUCKY by and through the KENTUCKY ENERGY ) AND ENVIRONMENT CABINET ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) Civil Action No. ________2:14-11609 ALPHA NATURAL RESOURCES, INC.; ALPHA ) APPALACHIA HOLDINGS, INC.; ALEX ENERGY, INC.; ) ALPHA PA COAL TERMINAL, LLC; AMFIRE MINING ) COMPANY, LLC; ARACOMA COAL CO., INC.; ) COMPLAINT BANDMILL COAL CORP.; BELFRY COAL CORP.; BIG ) BEAR MINING CO.; BROOKS RUN MINING COMPANY, ) LLC; BROOKS RUN SOUTH MINING LLC; CLEAR FORK ) COAL CO.; CUMBERLAND COAL RESOURCES, LP; ) DELBARTON MINING CO.; DICKENSON-RUSSELL ) COAL COMPANY, LLC; DUCHESS COAL CO.; EAGLE ) ENERGY, INC.; ELK RUN COAL CO., INC.; EMERALD ) COAL RESOURCES, LP; ENTERPRISE MINING ) COMPANY, LLC; GOALS COAL CO.; GREYEAGLE ) COAL CO.; HARLAN RECLAMATION SERVICES LLC; ) HERNDON PROCESSING CO., LLC; HIGHLAND MINING ) CO.; INDEPENDENCE COAL COMPANY, INC.; JACKS ) BRANCH COAL CO.; KANAWHA ENERGY CO.; KEPLER ) PROCESSING CO., LLC; KINGSTON MINING, INC.; ) KINGWOOD MINING CO., LLC; KNOX CREEK COAL ) CORP.; LITWAR PROCESSING CO., LLC; MARFORK ) COAL CO.; MARTIN COUNTY COAL CORP.; NEW ) RIDGE MINING CO.; OMAR MINING CO.; PARAMONT ) COAL COMPANY VIRGINIA, LLC; PAYNTER BRANCH ) MINING,
    [Show full text]
  • Will Massey Energy Company Suffer Severe Penalties in Clean Water Act Case?
    A BNA, INC. DAILY ! ENVIRONMENT REPORT Reproduced with permission from Daily Environment Report, Vol. 2007, No. 186, 09/26/2007, pp. B1 - B6. Copyright ஽ 2007 by The Bureau of National Affairs, Inc. (800-372-1033) http://www.bna.com ENFORCEMENT CLEAN WATER ACT When Wall Street analysts calculated the statutory maximum civil penalty in a Clean Wa- ter Act case against Massey Energy Company and several affiliated companies, a great deal of negative ‘‘buzz’’ was generated because of the potential magnitude of the fine, according to the author of this article. However, the author says the courts have been very reluctant to impose statutory maximum penalties. In this article, the author provides background on the issues in the case and, based on his experience as a consultant in these matters, offers his view of how the penalty actually will be calculated. Will Massey Energy Company Suffer Severe Penalties in Clean Water Act Case? BY ROBERT H. FUHRMAN conclusion. Even assuming the government is success- ful in its assertion of liability, my opinion, which I ex- all Street analysts and media reports have sug- plain in detail below, is that the likely penalty is in the gested Massey Energy Company faces a poten- range of $1.5 million to $7 million if this case is adjudi- W tial liability of $2.4 billion for alleged violations cated. of the Clean Water Act.1 I was retained by the company to assess its liability and have reached a far different Case Background 1 This figure appeared in several publications, including On May 10, 2007, in the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Consent Decree: United States of America V. Massey Energy Company, Et Al., Civil Action No. 2:07-0299
    IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) Civil Action No. 2:07-0299 ) Hon . John T . Copenhaver, Jr. MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY, et al ., ) ) CONSENT DECREE Defendants . ) ) TABLE OF CONTENTS I . BACKGROUND . ..... .... .... ... .. .. .... ..... .... ... ... ... ..... ... .-1­ II . JURISDICTION AND VENUE . ..... .... .. .. ... .... .... .. .... -2­ III . APPLICABILITY . ..... .... .. ... .. ... ... .... ... ... .. ... .... ... ... -2­ IV . DEFINITIONS . ..... .... .... ..... ... .. .. .:... ..... ... ... ... .... ..... .... -3­ V. CIVIL PENALTY ... ... ... .. .... ... ... ... .... .... ... .... .... ... ...... .... -7­ VI . COMPLIANCE REQUIREMENTS . ... .... ... .... ..... ... ... .... ... .. .... .... -8­ VII . INJUNCTIVE RELIEF . .... ..... ... ... .. ... ..... .... ..... ... ... ..... -12­ VIII . ADDITIONAL INJUNCTIVE RELIEF .. ... ... ... .. ... ... .. .. .... -20­ IX . REPORTING REQUIREMENTS . .... .... .... .... .... .... ..... .... ... .... .... -21­ X. STIPULATED PENALTIES . ..... .... .. ... ..... .... ... .. ... .... .... -27­ XI . FORCE MAJEURE . ...... ..... ... ... ... ... .. .. .... ...... .... :.. ..... .... .-31­ XII . DISPUTE RESOLUTION . ...... ... .... ... .. ... .. ... ... .... .... .. .. -34­ XIII . INFORMATION COLLECTION AND RETENTION ... .... ....... ..... ..... ., . -37­ XIV. EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT/RESERVATION OF RIGHTS . ....... .... .... ... -39­ XV. COSTS . .... .. .... ..... ... .... .... ...... ... .... .... ... -41­ XVI. NOTICES
    [Show full text]
  • Twists and Turns in Ancient Roads: As Unidentified
    CLIMATE CHANGE AND THE WAR ON COAL: EXPLORING THE DARK SIDE Patrick Charles McGinley∗ To see coal purely as a gift from God overlooks the many dangerous strings attached to that gift. Similarly, to see it as just an environmental evil would be to overlook the undeniable good that accompanies that evil. “Failing to recognize both sides of coal—the vast power and the exorbitant costs—misses the essential, heartbreaking drama of the story.1 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................... 256 I. Coal at the Millennium .......................................................................... 258 II. History of Coal ..................................................................................... 262 A. Early History .................................................................................... 262 B. Coal and the Industrial Age .............................................................. 262 C. Coal and Industrialization in the United States ................................ 263 III. Coal’s Dark Side: Examining its Externalities .................................... 265 A. The Socio-Economic Costs of Coal Mining and Burning ................ 266 1. Industrial Awakening in the Coalfields .............................. 266 ∗ Professor McGinley is the “Judge Charles H. Haden II Professor of Law” at West Virginia University. In the print version of Volume 13 Issue 2, the Vermont Journal of Environmental Law mistakenly inserted the name of a purported "co-author."
    [Show full text]
  • Massey Energy Company 2007 Annual Report Any X 26765
    Massey Energy Company Energy Massey 2007 MAssEy EnERgy CoMpAny Annual Report p.o. BoX 26765 RICHMonD, VA 23261 (804) 788-1800 Meet the energy behind massey energy Massey energy coMpany 2007 annual report finanCial highlights shareholder information Year Ended December 31, (In millions, except per share, per ton Common Stock Information Comparison of Cumulative Total Return for the and number of employees amounts) 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 at February 15, 2008, there were 80,491,644 shares Period December 31, 2002 to December 31, 2007 outstanding and approximately 6,800 shareholders $ 800 Consolidated Statement of Income Data of record of Massey energy’s common stock. $ 700 produced coal revenue $ 2,054.4 $ 1,902.3 $ 1,777.7 $ 1,456.7 $ 1,262.1 Registrar and Transfer Agent $ 600 Total revenue SM 2,413.5 2,219.9 2,204.3 1,766.6 1,571.4 Wells Fargo Shareowner Services $ 500 Income (Loss) before interest and Shareowner relations Department $ 400 income taxes 179.7 111.0 (20.9) 46.2 (17.5) p.o. Box 64854 Income (Loss) before cumulative effect St. paul, Mn 55164-0854 $ 300 of accounting change 94.1 41.6 (101.6) 13.9 (32.3) For change of address, lost dividends or lost stock $ 200 net income (loss) 94.1 41.0 (101.6) 13.9 (40.2) certificates, write or telephone: $ 100 Income (Loss) per share – Basic Wells Fargo Bank, n.a. $ 0 p.o. Box 64874 Income (Loss) before cumulative effect 12/02 12/03 12/04 12/05 12/06 12/07 of accounting change $ 1.17 $ 0.51 $ (1.33) $ 0.18 $ (0.43) St.
    [Show full text]
  • Response of Omar Mining Company, A.T
    NORMA ACORD, ::<L 'RORY L. PERRY II, CLERK West Virginia Residents, f SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Plaintiffs and Class Representatives, ~~l,~,j·:' OF WEST VIRGINIA Plaintiff/Petitioner, v. Appeal No. ______ Civil Action No. 04-C-lSl-0 CO LANE COMPANY, a West Virginia Circuit Court of Logan County corporation, individually and as a successor-in-interest to Cole & Crane Real Estate Trust; COAL & CRANE REAL ESTATE TRUST, a West Virginia trust; LOGAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, a West Virginia public body; WEST VIRGINIA COAL & COKE COMPANY, a West Virginia corporation, OMAR MINING COMPANY, a West Virginia corporation, individually and as successor-in-interest to West Virginia Coal & Coke Company; A.T. MASSEY COAL COMPANY, a West Virginia corporation, individually and as a successor-in-interest to West Virginia Coal & Coke Company; MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY, a Virginia corporation, individually and as a successor-in-interest to West Virginia Coal & Coke Company; RICHARD FRY, a West Virginia resident, individually, Defendants/Respondents. RESPONSE OF OMAR MINING COMPANY, A.T. MASSEY COAL COMPANY, INC., AND MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY TO PETITION FOR APPEAL Daniel L. Stickler (WVSB # 3613) Jonathan L. Anderson (WVSB # 9628) JACKSON KELL Y PLLC 1600 Laidley Tower Charleston, West Virginia 25301 (304) 340-1000 Counsel for Respondents Omar Mining Company, A. T. Massey Coal Company, Inc., and Massey Energy Company {C1863023.1 } TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 1 II. KIND OF PROCEEDING AND NATURE OF RULING BELOW .................................. .2 III. STATEMENT OF FACTS .................................................................................................. 3 A. Historical Background ............................................................................................. 3 1. 1920-1954: Coal & Coke's Operations in the Island Creek Valley ............. 3 2.
    [Show full text]
  • Winds of Change the Newsletter of The
    Winds of Change the newsletter of the March 2009 Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition E Huntington, WV www.ohvec.org Residents Vent Concerns to DEP by Joanie Newman, excerpted from Jan. 16, 2009, Coal Valley News Seventy-nine-year old Donald Maxey travelled the 6-hour drive from his home in Mt. Airy, Maryland, to Ashford Rumble Elementary School last week to voice his complaints with the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP). “I didn’t want to miss this because I was born and raised at Nellis and have family all the way up to Ridgeview,” he said. Maxey said he recalls walking over Bull Creek Mountain. “You couldn’t do that continued on page 4 MTR a threat to Hawks Nest State Park environs. See pages 3 and 16. Bush Midnight Rule Change Exposed to Sunlight of Justice In January, OVEC joined with other groups in suing planted by the Bush administration that an EPA headed by over one of Bush’s final controversial acts. With our legal Lisa Jackson stands to inherit,” Earthjustice attorney Jennifer challenge, we seek to overturn Bush’s last-minute repeal of Chavez said. “With this lawsuit, we are doing what we can the stream buffer zone rule – an environmental law that, to make it easier for the incoming administration to undo the since 1983, has prohibited surface coal mining activities damage wrought by the last one and restore our nation’s within 100 feet of flowing streams. commitment to protecting the waters and summits of the As you may have noticed, the former stream buffer Appalachians.” zone rule was ignored by coal companies and not enforced As this lawsuit proceeds, we are hoping for better by so-called regulatory agencies, but before Bush axed the coal-related enforcement under the Obama administration.
    [Show full text]
  • MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter)
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20549 FORM 8-K CURRENT REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Date of report (Date of earliest event reported): April 8, 2010 (April 5, 2010) MASSEY ENERGY COMPANY (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter) Delaware 1-7775 95-0740960 (State of Incorporation) (Commission File Number) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) 4 North 4th Street, Richmond, Virginia 23219 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (804) 788-1800 N/A (Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report date) Check the appropriate box below if the Form 8-K filing is intended to simultaneously satisfy the filing obligation of the registrant under any of the following provisions: Written communications pursuant to Rule 425 under the Securities Act (17 CFR 230.425) Soliciting material pursuant to Rule 14a-12 under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14a-12) Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 14d-2(b) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.14d-2(b)) Pre-commencement communications pursuant to Rule 13e-4(c) under the Exchange Act (17 CFR 240.13e-4(c)) https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/37748/000119312510079731/d8k.htm 9/26/2015 Form 8-K Page 2 of 4 Item 7.01 Regulation FD Disclosure On April 5, 2010, an explosion occurred at the Upper Big Branch mine in Montcoal, West Virginia, operated by our subsidiary, Performance Coal Company. The explosion resulted in 25 fatalities as of the date of this Current Report on Form 8-K (“Form 8-K”).
    [Show full text]
  • To Dance with the Devil: the Social Impact of Mountaintop Removal Surface Coal Mining Shirley Stewart Burns ABSTRACT
    To Dance with the Devil: The Social Impact of Mountaintop Removal Surface Coal Mining Shirley Stewart Burns ABSTRACT Five generations have passed since railroads began to take West Virginia’s bountiful natural-resource treasures of coal and timber to places outside the region, decimating the state’s hardwood forests and diminishing its coal reserves. By 1920, West Virginia’s bountiful hardwood forests had nearly disappeared. The repercussions of constantly extracting resources with no thought of the future consumed those within the region. At the turn of the nineteenth century, West Virginia’s inhabitants learned a difficult lesson about what such a “dance with the devil” could do. In this present struggle, once again balancing economics with community needs for a safe and functioning environment, this generation has now done the same. 4 SHIRLEY STEWART BURNS / TO DANCE WITH THE DEVIL ARTICLE “There are two roads in life, a right one and a wrong one. There is no in-between path to take.” —Pauline Canterberry, resident of Sylvester, West Virginia As the nineteenth century gave way to the twentieth, West Virginia’s rural backcounties experienced a fundamental transformation. Natural-resource speculators pervaded the area; chief among them were the coal and timber industries, along with their handmaiden, the railroad industry. Throughout West Virginia, beautiful hardwood forests came crashing down until, by the 1920s, nearly all of them were gone.1 Railroads penetrated the rugged countryside to whisk the natural treasures of timber and coal away from the state and into the large cities beyond. Older agricultural communities were soon joined by new industrial towns that dotted the landscape for the express purpose of providing a home for workers and their families.
    [Show full text]
  • Uncommon Productions Presents
    Uncommon Productions and DADA Films Present A Film by Bill Haney World Premiere 2011 Sundance Film Festival Opens in Theaters June 2011 Publicity: Distribution and Marketing: Los Angeles Dada Films Fredell Pogodin & Associates MJ Peckos Fredell Pogodin /Bradley Jones (310)273-1444 (323)931-7300 [email protected] [email protected] New York required viewing FALCO INK Steven Raphael Shannon Treusch/Janice Roland/Erin Bruce (212)206-0118 (212)445-7100 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Washington, DC Jamie Shor PR Collaborative (202) 339-9598 [email protected] 95 minutes • Rated PG SYNOPSIS In the valleys of Appalachia, a battle is being fought over a mountain. It is a battle with severe consequences that affect every American, regardless of their social status, economic background or where they live. It is a battle that has taken many lives and continues to do so the longer it is waged. It is a battle over protecting our health and environment from the destructive power of Big Coal. The mining and burning of coal is at the epicenter of America’s struggle to balance its energy needs with environmental concerns. Nowhere is that concern greater than in Coal River Valley, West Virginia, where a small but passionate group of ordinary citizens are trying to stop Big Coal corporations, like Massey Energy, from continuing the devastating practice of Mountain Top Removal. David, himself, never faced a Goliath like Big Coal. The citizens argue the practice of dynamiting the mountain’s top off to mine the coal within pollutes the air and water, is responsible for the deaths of their neighbors and spreads pollution to other states.
    [Show full text]
  • IN RE MASSEY ENERGY ) Consolidated COMPANY DERIVATIVE and ) C.A
    IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE ) IN RE MASSEY ENERGY ) Consolidated COMPANY DERIVATIVE AND ) C.A. No. 5430-CB CLASS ACTION LITIGATION ) ) OPINION @Xk\ OlYd`kk\[9 B\YilXip 7+ 1/06 @Xk\ @\Z`[\[9 IXp 3+ 1/06 Stuart Grant, Cynthia A. Calder, and Michael T. Manuel of GRANT & EISENHOFFER P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Mark Lebovitch and David Wales of BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER & GROSSMANN LLP, New York, New York; Gregory M. Nespole and Benjamin Y. Kaufman of WOLF HALDENSTEIN ADLER FREEMAN & HERZ LLP, New York, New York; Nadeem Faruqi of FARUQI & FARUQI, LLP, New York, New York; Co-Lead Attorneys for Plaintiffs. Kevin G. Abrams, Matthew L. Miller, and Michael A. Barlow of ABRAMS & BAYLISS LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; Ronald S. Rolfe and Julie A. North of CRAVATH, SWAINE & MOORE LLP, New York, New York; Attorneys for Defendants James B. Crawford, Robert H. Foglesong, Richard M. Gabrys, E. Gordon Gee, Bobby R. Inman, Dan R. Moore, Stanley C. Suboleski, and Lady Barbara Thomas Judge. Kenneth J. Nachbar and Ryan D. Stottmann of MORRIS, NICHOLS, ARSHT & TUNNELL LLP, Wilmington, Delaware; William W. Taylor, III and Steven N. Herman of ZUCKERMAN SPAEDER LLP, Washington, DC (on behalf of Don. L. Blankenship); Peter H. White of SCHULTE ROTH & ZABEL LLP, Washington, DC (on behalf of Mark A. Clemens and Jeffrey M. Jarosinski); Stephen E. Baril of KAPLAN VOEKLER CUNNINGHAM & FRANK PLC, Richmond, Virginia; Stephen P. Anthony of COVINGTON & BURLING LLP, Washington, DC (on behalf of Christopher Adkins); Attorneys for Defendants J. Christopher Adkins, Don L. Blankenship, Mark A. Clemens, Jeffrey M.
    [Show full text]