Analyses of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Databases Using Descriptive and Inferential Statistics

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Analyses of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Databases Using Descriptive and Inferential Statistics Analyses of Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Databases Using Descriptive and Inferential Statistics Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades (PhD) der Medizinischen Fakultät der Rheinischen Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn Diana Ivonne Dubrall aus Heidenheim an der Brenz 2020 Angefertigt mit der Genehmigung der Medizinischen Fakultät der Universität Bonn 1. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Matthias Schmid 2. Gutachter: Prof. Dr. med. Bernhardt Sachs Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 04.09.2020 Aus dem Institut für Medizinische Biometrie, Informatik und Epidemiologie Direktor: Prof. Dr. rer. nat. Matthias Schmid 3 Table of content Table of content ........................................................................................................ 3 List of abbreviations ................................................................................................. 4 1. Summary ............................................................................................................... 5 2. Introduction ........................................................................................................... 5 3. Objectives ............................................................................................................. 8 4. Methods ................................................................................................................. 8 4.1 BfArM’s ADR database ...................................................................................... 8 4.2 EudraVigilance .................................................................................................. 8 4.3 Descriptive analysis of all ADR reports .............................................................. 9 4.4 Adverse drug reactions in older adults .............................................................. 9 4.5 Drug-induced anaphylactic reactions in children ............................................... 9 4.6 Comparative analysis of ACEi, ARBs and aliskiren angioedema reports .......... 9 4.7 Statistical analysis ............................................................................................ 10 4.7.1 Odds Ratios ............................................................................................... 10 4.7.2 ADR reports per 100,000 inhabitants/assumed drug-exposed inhabitants 10 5. Results .................................................................................................................. 11 5.1 Descriptive analysis of all ADR reports ............................................................. 11 5.2 Adverse drug reactions in older adults ............................................................. 11 5.3 Drug-induced anaphylactic reactions in children .............................................. 12 5.4 Comparative analysis of ACEi, ARBs, and aliskiren angioedema reports ........ 12 6. Discussion ........................................................................................................... 12 7. Acknowledgement ............................................................................................... 15 8. References ........................................................................................................... 16 Appendix A ............................................................................................................... 24 Appendix B ...............................................................................................................45 Appendix C ...............................................................................................................84 Appendix D ...............................................................................................................97 Appendix E .............................................................................................................150 4 List of abbreviations ACEi Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor ADR Adverse Drug Reaction ARB Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker BfArM Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (Bundesinstitut für Arzneimittel und Medizinpodukte) EMA European Medicines Agency EudraVigilance European Adverse Drug Reaction Database CI Confidence Intervals DEGS1 German Health Interview and Examination Survey for Adults EEA European Economic Area HCP Health Care Professionals IMBIE Institute for Medical Biometry, Informatics and Epidemiology Non-HCP Non-Health Care Professionals NSAID Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs OR Odds Ratios OTC Over the Counter Drugs RAS Renin-Angiotensin System SMQ Standardised MedDRA Query USA United States of America 5 1. Summary The presented cumulative dissertation summarizes four scientific research papers of anal- yses assessing data of the adverse drug reaction (ADR) database of the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) and the European ADR database (EudraVigi- lance) of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). The objective was to analyse all ADR reports contained in BfArM’s ADR database descriptively for the first time and subse- quently with regard to three relevant pharmacovigilance questions. Therefore, research strategies for the identification of the cases depending on the research question were established and different statistical methods were used. Two of the known limitations of analysis performed in ADR databases are the lack of matching control groups and exact exposure data. To overcome these issues, we generated control groups within the ADR database and used external data sources to set the number of ADR reports in relation to the number of inhabitants and assumed drug-exposed inhabitants. All research articles have been published in international peer-reviewed journals (see Appendix A-D). 2. Introduction Prior to the approval of a drug, its safety and efficacy have to be investigated in clinical trials. In these only a limited number of patients are included, which are often selected according to strictly pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria (EMA, 2020). Especially vulnerable patients such as very old as well as very young patients or patients with comor- bidities are often not involved. Thus, the complete extent of ADRs is unknown when a drug is released to the market. Therefore, post-authorisation monitoring of the approved drugs remains crucial. Among others, ADR databases are one of the suitable tools to monitor drug safety. In the past, ADR reports served as one of the sources of evidence in 94.4 % of all regulatory actions due to safety issues in Europe (Lane et al., 2018). In Germany, ADRs are reported by Health Care Professionals (HCP) e.g. physicians and non-Health Care Professionals (non-HCP) e.g. consumers (Kommas et al., 2019). A de- tailed description about reporting channels and reporting obligations can be found else- where (Kommas et al., 2019). In brevity, all ADR reports of chemical defined drugs were stored in BfArM’s ADR database until November 22, 2017 (BfArM, 2013 a). Since then all ADR reports are being sent to the European ADR database (EudraVigilance). 6 The first study of this cumulative dissertation represents a descriptive analysis of all ADR reports contained in BfArM’s ADR database (Appendix A). Descriptive analyses of ADR databases were also published for other countries (Ozcan et al., 2016; Thiessard et al, 2005). However, the results from other countries cannot be transferred to Germany, since these may vary significantly due to different prescribing behaviours and differences be- tween the patient populations involved (e.g. genetic differences). In Germany, nearly 2.4 % - 6.4 % of all hospital admissions were ADR related and in- creased with rising age (Schneeweiss et al., 2002; Schurig et al., 2018). Likewise, the number of ADR reports per inhabitants referring to older adults (> 65 years) compared to younger adults was higher in other ADR database analysis (Aagaard et al., 2012). With regard to drug therapy in older adults, information on safety and efficacy are contained in less than half of initial drug approval documents (Ruiter at al., 2019). However, older adults are more prone to develop ADRs, since they exhibit numerous risk factors such as multi- morbidity, polypharmacy, as well as changes in pharmacokinetics, due to reduced kidney and liver function (Davies and O'Mahony, 2015). Additionally, the forthcoming demo- graphic change will shift the proportion of older adults in the German population. An in- crease up to 24-30 % until the year 2060 (2018: ~ 19 %) is expected (Destatis, 2019). Hence, the impact and significance of ADRs in older adults is supposed to gain further medical and economic relevance in the future. In our second study we analysed, whether an increase in the number of ADR reports referring to older adults in relation to the number of inhabitants and assumed drug-exposed inhabitants could already be observed in the past. Further on, we investigated whether there are differences in the reported character- istics in ADR reports of older and younger adults, which may highlight ADRs of particular importance for older adults (Appendix B). Opposed to older adults, ADR related hospital admissions are reported to be less common in children (Impicciatore et al., 2001). Based on emergency department records the inci- dence of drug-induced anaphylaxis for children (< 19 years) was estimated to be 0.5/100,000 person-years (West et al., 2007). Anaphylaxis is defined as a potentially se- vere generalized or systemic hypersensitivity reaction, in which the skin (e.g. urticaria, angioedema), the respiratory tract (e.g. dyspnea),
Recommended publications
  • Upregulation of Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptor-Α And
    Upregulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α and the lipid metabolism pathway promotes carcinogenesis of ampullary cancer Chih-Yang Wang, Ying-Jui Chao, Yi-Ling Chen, Tzu-Wen Wang, Nam Nhut Phan, Hui-Ping Hsu, Yan-Shen Shan, Ming-Derg Lai 1 Supplementary Table 1. Demographics and clinical outcomes of five patients with ampullary cancer Time of Tumor Time to Age Differentia survival/ Sex Staging size Morphology Recurrence recurrence Condition (years) tion expired (cm) (months) (months) T2N0, 51 F 211 Polypoid Unknown No -- Survived 193 stage Ib T2N0, 2.41.5 58 F Mixed Good Yes 14 Expired 17 stage Ib 0.6 T3N0, 4.53.5 68 M Polypoid Good No -- Survived 162 stage IIA 1.2 T3N0, 66 M 110.8 Ulcerative Good Yes 64 Expired 227 stage IIA T3N0, 60 M 21.81 Mixed Moderate Yes 5.6 Expired 16.7 stage IIA 2 Supplementary Table 2. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichment analysis of an ampullary cancer microarray using the Database for Annotation, Visualization and Integrated Discovery (DAVID). This table contains only pathways with p values that ranged 0.0001~0.05. KEGG Pathway p value Genes Pentose and 1.50E-04 UGT1A6, CRYL1, UGT1A8, AKR1B1, UGT2B11, UGT2A3, glucuronate UGT2B10, UGT2B7, XYLB interconversions Drug metabolism 1.63E-04 CYP3A4, XDH, UGT1A6, CYP3A5, CES2, CYP3A7, UGT1A8, NAT2, UGT2B11, DPYD, UGT2A3, UGT2B10, UGT2B7 Maturity-onset 2.43E-04 HNF1A, HNF4A, SLC2A2, PKLR, NEUROD1, HNF4G, diabetes of the PDX1, NR5A2, NKX2-2 young Starch and sucrose 6.03E-04 GBA3, UGT1A6, G6PC, UGT1A8, ENPP3, MGAM, SI, metabolism
    [Show full text]
  • The Change of Fingolimod Patient Profiles Over Time
    Journal of Personalized Medicine Article The Change of Fingolimod Patient Profiles over Time: A Descriptive Analysis of Two Non-Interventional Studies PANGAEA and PANGAEA 2.0 Tjalf Ziemssen 1,* and Ulf Schulze-Topphoff 2 1 Zentrum für Klinische Neurowissenschaften, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, D-01307 Dresden, Germany 2 Novartis Pharma GmbH, D-90429 Nuremberg, Germany; ulf.schulze_topphoff@novartis.com * Correspondence: Tjalf.Ziemssen@uniklinikum-dresden.de Abstract: (1) Background: Fingolimod (Gilenya®) was the first oral treatment for patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Since its approval, the treatment landscape has changed enormously. (2) Methods: Data of PANGAEA and PANGAEA 2.0, two German real-world studies, were descriptively analysed for possible evolution of patient profiles and treatment behavior. Both are prospective, multi-center, non-interventional, long-term studies on fingolimod use in RRMS in real life. Data of 4229 PANGAEA patients (recruited 2011–2013) and 2441 PANGAEA 2.0 patients (recruited 2015–2018) were available. Baseline data included demographics, RRMS characteristics and disease severity. (3) Results: The mean age of PANGAEA and PANGAEA 2.0 patients was similar (38.8 vs. 39.2 years). Patients in PANGAEA 2.0 had shorter disease duration (7.1 vs. 8.2 years) and fewer relapses in the year before baseline (1.2 vs. 1.6). Disease severity at baseline estimated by Citation: Ziemssen, T.; EDSS and SDMT was lower in PANGAEA 2.0 patients compared to PANGAEA (EDSS difference Schulze-Topphoff, U. The Change of 1.0 points; SDMT difference 3.3 points). (4) Conclusions: The results hint at an influence of changes in Fingolimod Patient Profiles over the treatment guidelines and the label on fingolimod patients profiles over time.
    [Show full text]
  • Classification of Medicinal Drugs and Driving: Co-Ordination and Synthesis Report
    Project No. TREN-05-FP6TR-S07.61320-518404-DRUID DRUID Driving under the Influence of Drugs, Alcohol and Medicines Integrated Project 1.6. Sustainable Development, Global Change and Ecosystem 1.6.2: Sustainable Surface Transport 6th Framework Programme Deliverable 4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Due date of deliverable: 21.07.2011 Actual submission date: 21.07.2011 Revision date: 21.07.2011 Start date of project: 15.10.2006 Duration: 48 months Organisation name of lead contractor for this deliverable: UVA Revision 0.0 Project co-funded by the European Commission within the Sixth Framework Programme (2002-2006) Dissemination Level PU Public PP Restricted to other programme participants (including the Commission x Services) RE Restricted to a group specified by the consortium (including the Commission Services) CO Confidential, only for members of the consortium (including the Commission Services) DRUID 6th Framework Programme Deliverable D.4.4.1 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Page 1 of 243 Classification of medicinal drugs and driving: Co-ordination and synthesis report. Authors Trinidad Gómez-Talegón, Inmaculada Fierro, M. Carmen Del Río, F. Javier Álvarez (UVa, University of Valladolid, Spain) Partners - Silvia Ravera, Susana Monteiro, Han de Gier (RUGPha, University of Groningen, the Netherlands) - Gertrude Van der Linden, Sara-Ann Legrand, Kristof Pil, Alain Verstraete (UGent, Ghent University, Belgium) - Michel Mallaret, Charles Mercier-Guyon, Isabelle Mercier-Guyon (UGren, University of Grenoble, Centre Regional de Pharmacovigilance, France) - Katerina Touliou (CERT-HIT, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Greece) - Michael Hei βing (BASt, Bundesanstalt für Straßenwesen, Germany).
    [Show full text]
  • Medical Review(S) Clinical Review
    CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH APPLICATION NUMBER: 22-527 MEDICAL REVIEW(S) CLINICAL REVIEW Application Type NDA Application Number 22-527 Priority or Standard P Submit Date 12-21-2009 Received Date 12-21-2009 PDUFA Goal Date 9-21-2010 Division / Office FDA/ODE1 Reviewer Name Heather D. Fitter Review Completion Date August 26, 2010 Established Name Fingolimod (Proposed) Trade Name Gilenya Therapeutic Class S1P receptor modulator Applicant Novartis Formulation(s) Oral tablets Dosing Regimen 0.5 mg Indication(s) To reduce the frequency of relapses and delay the progression of disability in relapsing MS Intended Population(s) Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis Template Version: March 6, 2009 Clinical Review Heather D. Fitter, M.D. NDA 22-527 Fingolimod Table of Contents 1 RECOMMENDATIONS/RISK BENEFIT ASSESSMENT......................................... 7 1.1 Recommendation on Regulatory Action ............................................................. 7 1.2 Risk Benefit Assessment.................................................................................... 8 2 INTRODUCTION AND REGULATORY BACKGROUND ........................................ 8 2.1 Product Information ............................................................................................ 9 2.2 Table of Currently Available Treatments for the Proposed Indication................. 9 2.3 Availability of Proposed Active Ingredient in the United States ........................ 12 2.4 Important Safety Issues with Consideration to Related Drugs.........................
    [Show full text]
  • Zebrafish Behavioral Profiling Links Drugs to Biological Targets and Rest/Wake Regulation
    www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/327/5963/348/DC1 Supporting Online Material for Zebrafish Behavioral Profiling Links Drugs to Biological Targets and Rest/Wake Regulation Jason Rihel,* David A. Prober, Anthony Arvanites, Kelvin Lam, Steven Zimmerman, Sumin Jang, Stephen J. Haggarty, David Kokel, Lee L. Rubin, Randall T. Peterson, Alexander F. Schier* *To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: schier@fas.harvard.edu (A.F.S.); rihel@fas.harvard.edu (J.R.) Published 15 January 2010, Science 327, 348 (2010) DOI: 10.1126/science.1183090 This PDF file includes: Materials and Methods SOM Text Figs. S1 to S18 Table S1 References Supporting Online Material Table of Contents Materials and Methods, pages 2-4 Supplemental Text 1-7, pages 5-10 Text 1. Psychotropic Drug Discovery, page 5 Text 2. Dose, pages 5-6 Text 3. Therapeutic Classes of Drugs Induce Correlated Behaviors, page 6 Text 4. Polypharmacology, pages 6-7 Text 5. Pharmacological Conservation, pages 7-9 Text 6. Non-overlapping Regulation of Rest/Wake States, page 9 Text 7. High Throughput Behavioral Screening in Practice, page 10 Supplemental Figure Legends, pages 11-14 Figure S1. Expanded hierarchical clustering analysis, pages 15-18 Figure S2. Hierarchical and k-means clustering yield similar cluster architectures, page 19 Figure S3. Expanded k-means clustergram, pages 20-23 Figure S4. Behavioral fingerprints are stable across a range of doses, page 24 Figure S5. Compounds that share biological targets have highly correlated behavioral fingerprints, page 25 Figure S6. Examples of compounds that share biological targets and/or structural similarity that give similar behavioral profiles, page 26 Figure S7.
    [Show full text]
  • NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Pharmacol Ther
    NIH Public Access Author Manuscript Pharmacol Ther. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 August 1. NIH-PA Author ManuscriptPublished NIH-PA Author Manuscript in final edited NIH-PA Author Manuscript form as: Pharmacol Ther. 2009 August ; 123(2): 239±254. doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2009.04.002. Ethnobotany as a Pharmacological Research Tool and Recent Developments in CNS-active Natural Products from Ethnobotanical Sources Will C. McClatcheya,*, Gail B. Mahadyb, Bradley C. Bennettc, Laura Shielsa, and Valentina Savod a Department of Botany, University of Hawaìi at Manoa, Honolulu, HI 96822, U.S.A b Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612, U.S.A c Department of Biological Sciences, Florida International University, Miami, FL 33199, U.S.A d Dipartimento di Biologia dì Roma Trè, Viale Marconi, 446, 00146, Rome, Italy Abstract The science of ethnobotany is reviewed in light of its multidisciplinary contributions to natural product research for the development of pharmaceuticals and pharmacological tools. Some of the issues reviewed involve ethical and cultural perspectives of healthcare and medicinal plants. While these are not usually part of the discussion of pharmacology, cultural concerns potentially provide both challenges and insight for field and laboratory researchers. Plant evolutionary issues are also considered as they relate to development of plant chemistry and accessing this through ethnobotanical methods. The discussion includes presentation of a range of CNS-active medicinal plants that have been recently examined in the field, laboratory and/or clinic. Each of these plants is used to illustrate one or more aspects about the valuable roles of ethnobotany in pharmacological research.
    [Show full text]
  • Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017
    Q UO N T FA R U T A F E BERMUDA PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 BR 111 / 2017 The Minister responsible for health, in exercise of the power conferred by section 48A(1) of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979, makes the following Order: Citation 1 This Order may be cited as the Pharmacy and Poisons (Third and Fourth Schedule Amendment) Order 2017. Repeals and replaces the Third and Fourth Schedule of the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 2 The Third and Fourth Schedules to the Pharmacy and Poisons Act 1979 are repealed and replaced with— “THIRD SCHEDULE (Sections 25(6); 27(1))) DRUGS OBTAINABLE ONLY ON PRESCRIPTION EXCEPT WHERE SPECIFIED IN THE FOURTH SCHEDULE (PART I AND PART II) Note: The following annotations used in this Schedule have the following meanings: md (maximum dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered at any one time. 1 PHARMACY AND POISONS (THIRD AND FOURTH SCHEDULE AMENDMENT) ORDER 2017 mdd (maximum daily dose) i.e. the maximum quantity of the substance that is contained in the amount of a medicinal product which is recommended to be taken or administered in any period of 24 hours. mg milligram ms (maximum strength) i.e. either or, if so specified, both of the following: (a) the maximum quantity of the substance by weight or volume that is contained in the dosage unit of a medicinal product; or (b) the maximum percentage of the substance contained in a medicinal product calculated in terms of w/w, w/v, v/w, or v/v, as appropriate.
    [Show full text]
  • Quality Use of Medicines in Residential Aged Care
    RESEARCH Quality use of medicines in Michael Somers residential aged care Ella Rose Dasha Simmonds Claire Whitelaw Janine Calver Christopher Beer Background Approximately 190 000 people in high risk of ADEs in frail older people. For example, Older people are more likely to be Australia were estimated to have anticholinergic drugs commonly produce adverse exposed to polypharmacy. People dementia in 2006, with the prevalence effects in elderly people and are more likely to be with dementia, especially those living expected to increase to 465 000 by 2031.1 prescribed to people with dementia than those in residential aged care facilities The prevalence of dementia increases without.7 (RACFs), are at particularly high risk of with age, from 6.5% of Australians aged Antipsychotic medications are commonly used medication harm. We sought to describe medications prescribed for a sample of 65 years and over to 22% of Australians to manage the behavioural and psychological 2 people with dementia living in RACFs. aged 85 years and over. Dementia is symptoms of dementia (BPSD), such as associated with a large burden of disease psychosis, depression, agitation, aggression Methods in Australia’s aging population, costing and disinhibition.1,8 There is concern that A total of 351 residents with dementia Australia $1.4 billion in 2003.2 Most of this antipsychotics are used too frequently as a aged over 65 years were recruited from 36 RACFs in Western Australia. burden was associated with residential first line treatment for BPSD, with the risks of 2 Data on all medications prescribed aged care facilities (RACFs). Dementia antipsychotic use outweighing the benefits at their were collected, including conventional is the medical problem most frequently likely level of use.8 For example, risperidone, an medications, herbal medications, managed by general practitioners atypical antipsychotic prescribed frequently for the vitamins and minerals.
    [Show full text]
  • 4 Supplementary File
    Supplemental Material for High-throughput screening discovers anti-fibrotic properties of Haloperidol by hindering myofibroblast activation Michael Rehman1, Simone Vodret1, Luca Braga2, Corrado Guarnaccia3, Fulvio Celsi4, Giulia Rossetti5, Valentina Martinelli2, Tiziana Battini1, Carlin Long2, Kristina Vukusic1, Tea Kocijan1, Chiara Collesi2,6, Nadja Ring1, Natasa Skoko3, Mauro Giacca2,6, Giannino Del Sal7,8, Marco Confalonieri6, Marcello Raspa9, Alessandro Marcello10, Michael P. Myers11, Sergio Crovella3, Paolo Carloni5, Serena Zacchigna1,6 1Cardiovascular Biology, 2Molecular Medicine, 3Biotechnology Development, 10Molecular Virology, and 11Protein Networks Laboratories, International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Padriciano, 34149, Trieste, Italy 4Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Trieste, Italy 5Computational Biomedicine Section, Institute of Advanced Simulation IAS-5 and Institute of Neuroscience and Medicine INM-9, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, 52425, Jülich, Germany 6Department of Medical, Surgical and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, 34149 Trieste, Italy 7National Laboratory CIB, Area Science Park Padriciano, Trieste, 34149, Italy 8Department of Life Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, 34127, Italy 9Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (IBCN), CNR-Campus International Development (EMMA- INFRAFRONTIER-IMPC), Rome, Italy This PDF file includes: Supplementary Methods Supplementary References Supplementary Figures with legends 1 – 18 Supplementary Tables with legends 1 – 5 Supplementary Movie legends 1, 2 Supplementary Methods Cell culture Primary murine fibroblasts were isolated from skin, lung, kidney and hearts of adult CD1, C57BL/6 or aSMA-RFP/COLL-EGFP mice (1) by mechanical and enzymatic tissue digestion. Briefly, tissue was chopped in small chunks that were digested using a mixture of enzymes (Miltenyi Biotec, 130- 098-305) for 1 hour at 37°C with mechanical dissociation followed by filtration through a 70 µm cell strainer and centrifugation.
    [Show full text]
  • PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX to the TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1
    Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE HARMONIZED TARIFF SCHEDULE Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (2020) Revision 19 Annotated for Statistical Reporting Purposes PHARMACEUTICAL APPENDIX TO THE TARIFF SCHEDULE 2 Table 1. This table enumerates products described by International Non-proprietary Names INN which shall be entered free of duty under general note 13 to the tariff schedule. The Chemical Abstracts Service CAS registry numbers also set forth in this table are included to assist in the identification of the products concerned. For purposes of the tariff schedule, any references to a product enumerated in this table includes such product by whatever name known.
    [Show full text]
  • Adverse Drug Reactions in Older Adults
    Dubrall et al. BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology (2020) 21:25 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40360-020-0392-9 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Adverse drug reactions in older adults: a retrospective comparative analysis of spontaneous reports to the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Diana Dubrall1,2* , Katja S. Just3, Matthias Schmid1, Julia C. Stingl3 and Bernhardt Sachs2,4 Abstract Background: Older adults are more prone to develop adverse drug reactions (ADRs) since they exhibit numerous risk factors. The first aim was to analyse the number of spontaneous ADR reports regarding older adults (> 65) in the ADR database of the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) and to set them in relation to i) the number of ADR reports concerning younger adults (19–65), and ii) the number of inhabitants and assumed drug-exposed inhabitants. The second aim was to analyse, if reported characteristics occurred more often in older vs. younger adults. Methods: All spontaneous ADR reports involving older or younger adults within the period 01/01/2000–10/31/2017 were identified in the ADR database. Ratios concerning the number of ADR reports/number of inhabitants and ADR reports/drug-exposed inhabitants were calculated. The reports for older (n = 69,914) and younger adults (n = 111, 463) were compared using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: The absolute number of ADR reports involving older adults increased from 1615 (2000) up to 5367 ADR reports (2016). The age groups 76–84 and 70–79 had the highest number of ADR reports with 25 ADR reports per 100,000 inhabitants and 27 ADR reports per 100,000 assumed drug-exposed inhabitants.
    [Show full text]
  • Health and Social Outcomes Associated with High-Risk Alcohol Use
    Manitoba Centre for Health Policy Health and Social Outcomes Associated with High-Risk Alcohol Use Summer 2018 Nathan C Nickel, MPH, PhD Jeff Valdivia, MNRM, CAPM Deepa Singal, PhD James Bolton, MD Christine Leong, PharmD Susan Burchill, BMus Leonard MacWilliam, MSc, MNRM Geoffrey Konrad, MD Randy Walld, BSc, BComm (Hons) Okechukwu Ekuma, MSc Greg Finlayson, PhD Leanne Rajotte, BComm (Hons) Heather Prior, MSc Josh Nepon, MD Michael Paille, BHSc This report is produced and published by the Manitoba Centre for Health Policy (MCHP). It is also available in PDF format on our website at: http://mchp-appserv.cpe.umanitoba.ca/deliverablesList.html Information concerning this report or any other report produced by MCHP can be obtained by contacting: Manitoba Centre for Health Policy Rady Faculty of Health Sciences Max Rady College of Medicine, University of Manitoba 4th Floor, Room 408 727 McDermot Avenue Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada R3E 3P5 Email: reports@cpe.umanitoba.ca Phone: (204) 789-3819 Fax: (204) 789-3910 How to cite this report: Nathan C Nickel, James Bolton, Leonard MacWilliam, Okechukwu Ekuma, Heather Prior, Jeff Valdivia, Christine Leong, Geoffrey Konrad, Greg Finlayson, Josh Nepon, Deepa Singal, Susan Burchill, Randy Walld, Leanne Rajotte, Michael Paille. Health and Social Outcomes Associated with High-Risk Alcohol Use. Winnipeg, MB. Manitoba Centre for Health Policy, Summer 2018. Legal Deposit: Manitoba Legislative Library National Library of Canada ISBN 978-1-896489-90-2 ©Manitoba Health This report may be reproduced, in whole or in part, provided the source is cited. 1st printing (Summer 2018) This report was prepared at the request of Manitoba Health, Seniors and Active Living (MHSAL), a department within the Government of Manitoba, as part of the contract between the University of Manitoba and MHSAL.
    [Show full text]