DOCSLIB.ORG

The Eight Pillars of Innovation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Eight Pillars of Innovation The Eight Pillars of Innovation Susan Wojcicki, Senior Vice President of Advertising, offers a Google-eye view on how to stay creative. WORDS BY Susan Wojcicki ILLUSTRATION BY Robert Samuel Hanson he greatest innovations are the ones we take for granted, like light bulbs, refrigeration and penicillin. But in a world where the miraculous very quickly becomes common-place, how can a company, especially one as big as Google, maintain a spirit of innovation year after year? THINK INNOVATION 33 Nurturing a culture that allows for When we start work in a new area, He began scanning pages, timed how innovation is the key. As we’ve grown to it’s often because we see an important long it took with a metronome, ran over 26,000 employees in more than 60 issue that hasn’t been solved and we’re the numbers and realized it would be offices, we’ve worked hard to maintain confident that technology can make possible to bring the world’s books the unique spirit that characterized a difference. For example, Gmail was online. Today, our Book Search index Google way back when I joined as created to address the need for more contains over 10 million books. employee #16. web email functionality, great search Similarly, AdSense, which delivers At that time I was Head of Marketing and more storage. contextual ads to websites, started (a group of one), and over the past Our mission is one that has the when one engineer put ads in decade I’ve been lucky enough to work potential to touch many lives, and Gmail. We realized that with more on a wide range of products. Some were we make sure that all our employees sophisticated technology we could big wins, others weren’t. Although feel connected to it and empowered to do an even better job by devoting much has changed through the years, I help achieve it. In times of crisis, they additional resources to this tiny believe our commitment to innovation have helped by organizing life-saving project. Today, AdSense ads reach 80 and risk has remained constant. information and making it readily percent of global internet users – it What’s different is that, even as available. The dedicated Googlers is the world’s largest ad network – we dream up what’s next, we face the who launched our Person Finder tool and we have hundreds of thousands of classic innovator’s dilemma: should we (see page 17) within two hours of publishers worldwide. invest in brand new products, or should the earthquake and tsunami in Japan we improve existing ones? We believe in this March are a wonderful recent doing both, and learning while we do it. example of that commitment. Here are eight principles of innovation we’ve picked up along the way to guide us as we go. Strive_for_continual_ Think_big_but_ innovation, not_instant_ start_small perfection Have_a_mission_ No matter how ambitious the plan, you that_matters have to roll up your sleeves and The best part of working on the web? start somewhere. Google Books, We get do-overs. Lots of them. The Work can be more than a job when it which has brought the content of first version of AdWords, released in stands for something you care about. millions of books online, was an 1999, wasn’t very successful – almost Google’s mission is to ‘organize idea that our founder, Larry Page, no one clicked on the ads. Not many the world’s information and make had for a long time. People thought people remember that because we kept it universally accessible and useful.’ it was too crazy even to try, but he iterating and eventually reached the We use this simple statement to guide went ahead and bought a scanner model we have today. And we’re still all of our decisions. and hooked it up in his office. improving it; every year we run tens THINK INNOVATION 34 of thousands of search and ads quality engineer went to the board and wrote outcomes. We try to facilitate this by experiments, and over the past year down the details of a convoluted working in small, crowded teams in we’ve launched over a dozen new problem we had with our ads system. open cube arrangements, rather than formats. Some products we update A group of Googlers lacking exciting individual offices. every day. plans for the evening began re-writing When someone has an idea or needs Our iterative process often teaches the algorithm within hours and had input on a decision, they can just look us invaluable lessons. Watching solved the problem by Tuesday. up and say, ‘Hey…’ to the person sitting users ‘in the wild’ as they use our Some of the best ideas at Google next to them. Maybe that cube-mate products is the best way to find are sparked just like that – when small will have something to contribute as out what works, then we can act on groups of Googlers take a break on a well. The idea for language translation that feedback. It’s much better to random afternoon and start talking in Google Talk (our Gmail chat client) learn these things early and be able about things that excite them. The came out of conversations between the to respond than to go too far down Google Art Project, which brought Google Talk and Google Translate the wrong path. thousands of museum works online, teams when they happened to be Iterating has served us well. We and successful AdWords features like working near one another. weren’t first to Search, but we were Automated Rules, are great examples able to make progress in the market of projects that started out in our by working quickly, learning faster ‘microkitchens.’ This is why we make and taking our next steps based sure Google is stocked with plenty of on data. snacks at all times. Spark_with_imagination, fuel_with_data In our fast-evolving market, it’s hard for people to know, or even imagine, Look_for_ideas_ Share_everything what they want. That’s why we recruit everywhere people who believe the impossible Our employees know pretty much can become a reality. One example As the leader of our Ads products, everything that’s going on and why is Sebastian Thrun who, along with I want to hear ideas from everyone decisions are made. Every quarter, his team, is building technology for – and that includes our partners, we share the entire Board Letter driverless cars to reduce the number advertisers and all of the people on with all 26,000 employees, and we of lives lost to roadside accidents each my team. I also want to be a part present the same slides presented to year. These cars, still in development, of the conversations Googlers are the Board of Directors in a company- have logged 140,000 hands-free miles having in the hallways. wide meeting. driving down San Francisco’s famously Several years ago, we took this quite By sharing everything, you twisty Lombard Street, across literally and posted an ideas board on encourage the discussion, exchange the Golden Gate Bridge and up a wall at Google’s headquarters in and re-interpretation of ideas, which the Pacific Coast Highway without Mountain View. On a Friday night, an can lead to unexpected and innovative a single accident. THINK INNOVATION 35 We try to encourage this type of so strongly in the power of open Quantify: Innovation blue-sky thinking through ‘20 percent technologies. They enable anyone, In a recent six-month period, time’ – a full day a week during which anywhere, to apply their unique skills, half of Google’s core initiatives engineers can work on whatever they perspectives and passions to the started as projects during employees’ 20 percent innovation time.5 want. Looking back at our launch creation of new products and features calendar over a recent six-month period, on top of our platforms. we found that many products started This openness helps to move the your misses. It’s okay to fail as long life in employees’ 20 percent time. needle forward for everyone involved. as you learn from your mistakes and What begins with intuition is fueled Google Earth, for example, allows correct them fast. Trust me, we’ve by insights. If you’re lucky, these developers to build ‘layers’ on top of failed plenty of times. Knowing that it’s reinforce one another. For a while our maps and share them with the okay to fail can free you up to take risks. the number of Google search results world. One user created a layer that And the tech industry is so dynamic displayed on a page was 10 simply uses animations of real-time sensor that the moment you stop taking risks because our founders thought that was data to illustrate what might happen if is the moment you get left behind. the best number. We eventually did a sea levels rose from one to 100 meters. Two of the first projects I worked on at test, asking users, ‘Would you like 10, 20 Another famous example of open Google, AdSense and Google Answers, or 30 search results on one page?’ They technology is our mobile platform, were both uncharted territory for the unanimously said they wanted 30. But Android. There are currently over company. While AdSense grew to be 10 results did far better in actual user 310 devices on the market built on a multi-billion-dollar business, Google tests, because the page loaded faster. It the Android OS, and close to half a Answers (which let users post questions turns out that providing 30 results was million Android developers outside and pay an expert for the answer) was 20 percent slower than providing 10, the company who enjoy the support retired after four years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Youtube Comments As Media Heritage
    YouTube comments as media heritage Acquisition, preservation and use cases for YouTube comments as media heritage records at The Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision Archival studies (UvA) internship report by Jack O’Carroll YOUTUBE COMMENTS AS MEDIA HERITAGE Contents Introduction 4 Overview 4 Research question 4 Methods 4 Approach 5 Scope 5 Significance of this project 6 Chapter 1: Background 7 The Netherlands Institute for Sound and Vision 7 Web video collection at Sound and Vision 8 YouTube 9 YouTube comments 9 Comments as archival records 10 Chapter 2: Comments as audience reception 12 Audience reception theory 12 Literature review: Audience reception and social media 13 Conclusion 15 Chapter 3: Acquisition of comments via the YouTube API 16 YouTube’s Data API 16 Acquisition of comments via the YouTube API 17 YouTube API quotas 17 Calculating quota for full web video collection 18 Updating comments collection 19 Distributed archiving with YouTube API case study 19 Collecting 1.4 billion YouTube annotations 19 Conclusions 20 Chapter 4: YouTube comments within FRBR-style Sound and Vision information model 21 FRBR at Sound and Vision 21 YouTube comments 25 YouTube comments as derivative and aggregate works 25 Alternative approaches 26 Option 1: Collect comments and treat them as analogue for the time being 26 Option 2: CLARIAH Media Suite 27 Option 3: Host using an open third party 28 Chapter 5: Discussion 29 Conclusions summary 29 Discussion: Issue of use cases 29 Possible use cases 30 Audience reception use case 30 2 YOUTUBE
    [Show full text]
  • 'Boxing Clever
    NOVEMBER 05 2018 sandboxMUSIC MARKETING FOR THE DIGITAL ERA ISSUE 215 ’BOXING CLEVER SANDBOX SUMMIT SPECIAL ISSUE Event photography: Vitalij Sidorovic Music Ally would like to thank all of the Sandbox Summit sponsors in association with Official lanyard sponsor Support sponsor Networking/drinks provided by #MarketMusicBetter ast Wednesday (31st October), Music Ally held our latest Sandbox Summit conference in London. While we were Ltweeting from the event, you may have wondered why we hadn’t published any reports from the sessions on our site and ’BOXING CLEVER in our bulletin. Why not? Because we were trying something different: Music Ally’s Sandbox Summit conference in London, IN preparing our writeups for this special-edition sandbox report. From the YouTube Music keynote to panels about manager/ ASSOCIATION WITH LINKFIRE, explored music marketing label relations, new technology and in-house ad-buying, taking in Fortnite and esports, Ed Sheeran, Snapchat campaigns and topics, as well as some related areas, with a lineup marketing to older fans along the way, we’ve broken down the key views, stats and debates from our one-day event. We hope drawn from the sharp end of these trends. you enjoy the results. :) 6 | sandbox | ISSUE 215 | 05.11.2018 TALES OF THE ’TUBE Community tabs, premieres and curation channels cited as key tools for artists on YouTube in 2018 ensions between YouTube and the music industry remain at raised Tlevels following the recent European Parliament vote to approve Article 13 of the proposed new Copyright Directive, with YouTube’s CEO Susan Wojcicki and (the day after Sandbox Summit) music chief Lyor Cohen both publicly criticising the legislation.
    [Show full text]
  • Larry Page Developing the Largest Corporate Foundation in Every Successful Company Must Face: As Google Word.” the United States
    LOWE —continued from front flap— Praise for $19.95 USA/$23.95 CAN In addition to examining Google’s breakthrough business strategies and new business models— In many ways, Google is the prototype of a which have transformed online advertising G and changed the way we look at corporate successful twenty-fi rst-century company. It uses responsibility and employee relations——Lowe Google technology in new ways to make information universally accessible; promotes a corporate explains why Google may be a harbinger of o 5]]UZS SPEAKS culture that encourages creativity among its where corporate America is headed. She also A>3/9A addresses controversies surrounding Google, such o employees; and takes its role as a corporate citizen as copyright infringement, antitrust concerns, and “It’s not hard to see that Google is a phenomenal company....At Secrets of the World’s Greatest Billionaire Entrepreneurs, very seriously, investing in green initiatives and personal privacy and poses the question almost Geico, we pay these guys a whole lot of money for this and that key g Sergey Brin and Larry Page developing the largest corporate foundation in every successful company must face: as Google word.” the United States. grows, can it hold on to its entrepreneurial spirit as —Warren Buffett l well as its informal motto, “Don’t do evil”? e Following in the footsteps of Warren Buffett “Google rocks. It raised my perceived IQ by about 20 points.” Speaks and Jack Welch Speaks——which contain a SPEAKS What started out as a university research project —Wes Boyd conversational style that successfully captures the conducted by Sergey Brin and Larry Page has President of Moveon.Org essence of these business leaders—Google Speaks ended up revolutionizing the world we live in.
    [Show full text]
  • Google, Yahoo and Others Use Online History to Target Advertising
    Google, Yahoo and others use online history to target advertising By Mike Swift [email protected] Google, Yahoo and other major Internet advertising companies are developing new ways to tailor ads by tracking users' online history — and can even auction off individual customers to advertisers in the few milliseconds between a person clicking a link and the page appearing on their screen. But with Internet advertisers increasingly adept at targeting individuals based on the digital bread crumbs they leave as they click through the Web, "behavioral advertising" is also attracting greater scrutiny from government regulators, politicians and interest groups concerned about user privacy. Internet companies say such targeting pays off for consumers and advertisers, because it is more likely to serve up ads people are actually interested in. Critics counter that most Americans do not want advertising tailored to their interests, particularly when it requires tracking their online movements. "It's kind of like the Wild West out there with behavioral advertising, where clearly the technology is miles ahead of our ability to regulate all the things that are going on," said Conrad MacKerron of the San Francisco-based As You Sow Foundation, which advocates for corporate responsibility. The foundation will offer a shareholder proposal at Mountain View-based Google's annual meeting May 13 asking for stronger privacy rules for personal data collected for behavioral ads. Google launched what it calls "interest-based advertising" last year, saying it would make advertising more relevant by tracking users and categorizing their interests in topics such as sports, gardening, cars and pets.
    [Show full text]
  • Google's Management Change and the Enterprise
    STEPHEN E ARNOLD APRIL 20, 2011 Google’s Management Change and the Enterprise Google completed its management shift in April 2011 with several bold moves. The story of founder Larry Page’s move to the pilot’s seat appeared in most news, financial, and consumer communication channels. American business executives have a status similar to that accorded film and rock and roll stars. An aspect of the changes implemented in his first week on the job as the top Googler included some surprising, and potentially far reaching shifts in the $30 billion search and advertising giant. First, a number of executive shifts took place. Jonathan Rosenberg, the senior vice president of product management, left the company on the day Mr. Page officially assumed Mr. Schmidt’s duties. Mr. Rosenberg, a bright and engaging professional, was not a technologist’s technologist. I would characterize Mr. Rosenberg as a manager and a sales professional. The rumor that Mr. Rosenberg and Mr. Schmidt would write a book about their experiences at Google surfaced and then disappeared. The ideas was intriguing and reinforced the Charlie Sheen-magnetism senior business executives engender in the post-crash US. The echo from the door snicking shut had not faded when Mr. Page announced a shift in the top management of the company. For example, Sundar Pichai http://www.thechromesource.com/sundar-pichai- chrome-and-chrome-os-vp-being-courted-by-twitter/ (who has been at Google since 2004 and was allegedly recruited by Twitter) took over Chrome, Google’s Web browser and possible mobile device operating system alternative to Android.
    [Show full text]
  • The Google Library Project: Is Digitization for Purposes of Online Indexing Fair Use Under Copyright Law?
    . The Google Library Project: Is Digitization for Purposes of Online Indexing Fair Use Under Copyright Law? Kate M. Manuel Legislative Attorney May 14, 2009 Congressional Research Service 7-5700 www.crs.gov R40194 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress c11173008 . The Google Library Project Summary The Google Book Search Library Project, announced in December 2004, raised important questions about infringing reproduction and fair use under copyright law. Google planned to digitize, index, and display “snippets” of print books in the collections of five major libraries without the permission of the books’ copyright holders, if any. Authors and publishers owning copyrights to these books sued Google in September and October 2005, seeking to enjoin and recover damages for Google’s alleged infringement of their exclusive rights to reproduce and publicly display their works. Google and proponents of its Library Project disputed these allegations. They essentially contended that Google’s proposed uses were not infringing because Google allowed rights holders to “opt out” of having their books digitized or indexed. They also argued that, even if Google’s proposed uses were infringing, they constituted fair uses under copyright law. The arguments of the parties and their supporters highlighted several questions of first impression. First, does an entity conducting an unauthorized digitization and indexing project avoid committing copyright infringement by offering rights holders the opportunity to “opt out,” or
    [Show full text]
  • Google Overview Created by Phil Wane
    Google Overview Created by Phil Wane PDF generated using the open source mwlib toolkit. See http://code.pediapress.com/ for more information. PDF generated at: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:03:55 UTC Contents Articles Google 1 Criticism of Google 20 AdWords 33 AdSense 39 List of Google products 44 Blogger (service) 60 Google Earth 64 YouTube 85 Web search engine 99 User:Moonglum/ITEC30011 105 References Article Sources and Contributors 106 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 112 Article Licenses License 114 Google 1 Google [1] [2] Type Public (NASDAQ: GOOG , FWB: GGQ1 ) Industry Internet, Computer software [3] [4] Founded Menlo Park, California (September 4, 1998) Founder(s) Sergey M. Brin Lawrence E. Page Headquarters 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway, Mountain View, California, United States Area served Worldwide Key people Eric E. Schmidt (Chairman & CEO) Sergey M. Brin (Technology President) Lawrence E. Page (Products President) Products See list of Google products. [5] [6] Revenue US$23.651 billion (2009) [5] [6] Operating income US$8.312 billion (2009) [5] [6] Profit US$6.520 billion (2009) [5] [6] Total assets US$40.497 billion (2009) [6] Total equity US$36.004 billion (2009) [7] Employees 23,331 (2010) Subsidiaries YouTube, DoubleClick, On2 Technologies, GrandCentral, Picnik, Aardvark, AdMob [8] Website Google.com Google Inc. is a multinational public corporation invested in Internet search, cloud computing, and advertising technologies. Google hosts and develops a number of Internet-based services and products,[9] and generates profit primarily from advertising through its AdWords program.[5] [10] The company was founded by Larry Page and Sergey Brin, often dubbed the "Google Guys",[11] [12] [13] while the two were attending Stanford University as Ph.D.
    [Show full text]
  • The Name “Google”
    11/8/2013 Google’s Starting and Founding “Google’s current Philosophy” • Google began in January 1996 as a research project Ten things we know to be true by Larry Page and Sergey Brin when they were both PhD We first wrote these “10 things” when Google was just a few years old. From time to time we revisit this list to see if it still holds true. We hope it does—and you can hold us to that. students at Stanford University in Stanford, California. • While conventional search engines ranked results by counting how 1. Focus on the user and all else will follow. many times the search terms appeared on the page, the two theorized about a better system that analyzed the relationships 2. It’s best to do one thing really, really well. between websites.[27] They called this new technology PageRank; it 3. Fast is better than slow. determined a website's relevance by the number of pages, and the importance of those pages, that linked back to the original site. The 4. Democracy on the web works. domain name for Google was registered on September 15, 1997, and the Email, Calendars, Online Storage Etc. company was incorporated on September 4, 1998. It was based in a 5. You don’t need to be at your desk to need an answer. friend's (Susan Wojcicki) garage in Menlo Park, California. Craig 6. You can make money without doing evil. Silverstein, a fellow PhD student at Stanford, was hired as the first November 9th employee. 7. There’s always more information out there.
    [Show full text]
  • Networking Best Practices for Large Deployments Google, Inc
    Networking Best Practices for Large Deployments Google, Inc. 1600 Amphitheatre Parkway Mountain View, CA 94043 www.google.com Part number: NETBP_GAPPS_3.8 November 16, 2016 © Copyright 2016 Google, Inc. All rights reserved. Google, the Google logo, G Suite, Gmail, Google Docs, Google Calendar, Google Sites, Google+, Google Talk, Google Hangouts, Google Drive, Gmail are trademarks, registered trademarks, or service marks of Google Inc. All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. Use of any Google solution is governed by the license agreement included in your original contract. Any intellectual property rights relating to the Google services are and shall remain the exclusive property of Google, Inc. and/or its subsidiaries (“Google”). You may not attempt to decipher, decompile, or develop source code for any Google product or service offering, or knowingly allow others to do so. Google documentation may not be sold, resold, licensed or sublicensed and may not be transferred without the prior written consent of Google. Your right to copy this manual is limited by copyright law. Making copies, adaptations, or compilation works, without prior written authorization of Google. is prohibited by law and constitutes a punishable violation of the law. No part of this manual may be reproduced in whole or in part without the express written consent of Google. Copyright © by Google Inc. Google provides this publication “as is” without warranty of any either express or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose. Google Inc. may revise this publication from time to time without notice.
    [Show full text]
  • Predicting Web Searcher Satisfaction with Existing Community-Based Answers
    Predicting Web Searcher Satisfaction with Existing Community-based Answers Qiaoling Liu§, Eugene Agichtein§, Gideon Dror†, Evgeniy Gabrilovich‡, Yoelle Maarek†, Dan Pelleg†, Idan Szpektor†, §Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA †Yahoo! Research, Haifa, Israel ‡Yahoo! Research, Santa Clara, CA, USA {qliu26, eugene}@mathcs.emory.edu, {gideondr, gabr, yoelle, dpelleg, idan}@yahoo-inc.com ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Community-based Question Answering (CQA) sites, such “Just because Google exists doesn’t mean you should as Yahoo! Answers, Baidu Knows, Naver, and Quora, have stop asking people things.” – Alexia Tsotsis [35] been rapidly growing in popularity. The resulting archives Community-based Question Answering (CQA) sites, such of posted answers to questions, in Yahoo! Answers alone, as Yahoo! Answers, Baidu Knows, and Naver Ji-Sik-In, as already exceed in size 1 billion, and are aggressively indexed well as more social-oriented newcomers such as Vark and by web search engines. In fact, a large number of search Quora, have gained substantial popularity over the recent engine users benefit from these archives, by finding existing years, effectively filling a niche left by the mainstream Web answers that address their own queries. This scenario poses search engines. People around the globe resort to commu- new challenges and opportunities for both search engines nity help for a variety of reasons, from lack of proficiency in and CQA sites. To this end, we formulate a new problem of Web search to seeking an answer “with a human touch”. Al- predicting the satisfaction of web searchers with CQA an- though some of these sites allow for monetary payments in swers.
    [Show full text]
  • Google Ngram Viewer by Andrew Weiss
    Google Ngram Viewer By Andrew Weiss Digital Services Librarian California State University, Northridge Introduction: Google, mass digitization and the emerging science of culturonomics Google Books famously launched in 2004 with great fanfare and controversy. Two stated original goals for this ambitious digitization project were to replace the generic library card catalog with their new “virtual” one and to scan all the books that have ever been published, which by a Google employee’s reckoning is approximately 129 million books. (Google 2014) (Jackson 2010) Now ten years in, the Google Books mass-digitization project as of May 2014 has claimed to have scanned over 30 million books, a little less than 24% of their overt goal. Considering the enormity of their vision for creating this new type of massive digital library their progress has been astounding. However, controversies have also dominated the headlines. At the time of the Google announcement in 2004 Jean Noel Jeanneney, head of Bibliothèque nationale de France at the time, famously called out Google’s strategy as excessively Anglo-American and dangerously corporate-centric. (Jeanneney 2007) Entrusting a corporation to the digitization and preservation of a diverse world-wide corpus of books, Jeanneney argues, is a dangerous game, especially when ascribing a bottom-line economic equivalent figure to cultural works of inestimable personal, national and international value. Over the ten years since his objections were raised, many of his comments remain prescient and relevant to the problems and issues the project currently faces. Google Books still faces controversies related to copyright, as seen in the current appeal of the Author’s Guild v.
    [Show full text]
  • The Power of Google: Serving Consumers Or Threatening Competition? Hearing Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate
    S. HRG. 112–168 THE POWER OF GOOGLE: SERVING CONSUMERS OR THREATENING COMPETITION? HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ANTITRUST, COMPETITION POLICY AND CONSUMER RIGHTS OF THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED TWELFTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION SEPTEMBER 21, 2011 Serial No. J–112–43 Printed for the use of the Committee on the Judiciary ( U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 71–471 PDF WASHINGTON : 2011 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:11 Dec 21, 2011 Jkt 071471 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 5011 Sfmt 5011 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\71471.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY PATRICK J. LEAHY, Vermont, Chairman HERB KOHL, Wisconsin CHUCK GRASSLEY, Iowa DIANNE FEINSTEIN, California ORRIN G. HATCH, Utah CHUCK SCHUMER, New York JON KYL, Arizona DICK DURBIN, Illinois JEFF SESSIONS, Alabama SHELDON WHITEHOUSE, Rhode Island LINDSEY GRAHAM, South Carolina AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota JOHN CORNYN, Texas AL FRANKEN, Minnesota MICHAEL S. LEE, Utah CHRISTOPHER A. COONS, Delaware TOM COBURN, Oklahoma RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut BRUCE A. COHEN, Chief Counsel and Staff Director KOLAN DAVIS, Republican Chief Counsel and Staff Director SUBCOMMITTEE ON ANTITRUST, COMPETITION POLICY AND CONSUMER RIGHTS HERB KOHL, Wisconsin, Chairman CHUCK SCHUMER, New York MICHAEL S. LEE, Utah AMY KLOBUCHAR, Minnesota CHUCK GRASSLEY, Iowa AL FRANKEN, Minnesota JOHN CORNYN, Texas RICHARD BLUMENTHAL, Connecticut CAROLINE HOLLAND, Democratic Chief Counsel/Staff Director DAVID BARLOW, Republican General Counsel (II) VerDate Nov 24 2008 11:11 Dec 21, 2011 Jkt 071471 PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 5904 Sfmt 5904 S:\GPO\HEARINGS\71471.TXT SJUD1 PsN: CMORC C O N T E N T S STATEMENTS OF COMMITTEE MEMBERS Page Feinstein, Hon.
    [Show full text]