DOCSLIB.ORG

Have Relocations Been a Successful Management Tool for the Conservation of Oribi Antelope in Kwazulu-Natal?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Have Relocations Been a Successful Management Tool for the Conservation of Oribi Antelope in Kwazulu-Natal? Have relocations been a successful management tool for the conservation of oribi antelope in KwaZulu-Natal? Savanna Science Network Meeting: March 2016 © Keenan Stears Tamanna Patel, Dr. Adrian Shrader, Dr. Keenan Stears, Dr. Ian Little Oribi (Ourebia ourebi) • Highly specialized antelope • Grassland requirements • Numbers are declining in South Africa • Habitat loss & fragmentation • Illegal hunting & poaching • Current status: • Vulnerable Oribi Working Group • Monitor oribi population numbers through annual oribi surveys • Aims to promote the long term survival of oribi in their natural grassland habitats © Ian Little Relocations • What is a relocation? • Movement of an animal or population of animals from an area where they are currently threatened to a more suitable area • Successful relocations • Arabian oryx • White rhinoceros • Springbok Successful Relocation • Results in a self-sustaining population • Births observed every year • Increase in population number • Prior to relocation: • Basic set of criteria should be met: • Aims of the relocation should be defined clearly • Assessment of habitat suitability should be conducted • Post-relocation: • Long-term monitoring over several years Oribi Relocations? Key Questions 1. What is the success rate of previous oribi relocations in KwaZulu-Natal? 2. Have relocations been a successful conservation tool for oribi? 3. What are the factors driving the success/failure of these relocations? 4. How can the success of relocations be improved in future? Data Collection • 10 sites in KwaZulu-Natal with relocated oribi • 10 points to consider before any relocation (Pérez et al. 2012) • Trends at each site → Success/fail • Factors influencing success/failure → Additional questions Pérez et al. 2012 1. Is the population under threat? 2. Have threatening factors been removed/controlled? 3. Are relocations the best tool to use? 4. Are risks for the target species acceptable? 5. Are risks for other species/ecosystem acceptable? 6. Effects of the relocation acceptable to local people? 7. Does the project maximize the likelihood of establishing a viable population? 8. Does the project include clear goals and monitoring? 9. Do enough economic and human resources exist? 10. Do scientific, governmental & stakeholder groups support the relocation? 10 9 8 7 6 No. of sites of No. sites 5 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Points to consider (Pérez et al. 2012) The number of sites that considered each point before any relocation 10 9 8 7 6 No. of sites of No. sites 5 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Points to consider (Pérez et al. 2012) The number of sites that considered each point before any relocation Points that were overlooked at many of the sites: • Have threatening factors been removed or controlled? • Are risks for the target species acceptable? • Does the project maximize the likelihood of establishing a viable population? • Does the project include clear goals and monitoring? • Do enough economic and human resources exist? Success or Fail? 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 No. of No. Sites 2 1 0 Increasing Decreasing Stable Population Trend Number of criteria initially considered vs. Lambda 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Population growth rate (lambda) 0.0 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of criteria considered Factors driving these trends • A model selection procedure based on small- sample corrected (second order) Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) values. • Generalized linear model: • Gamma distribution and a log link function • Best fit model (lowest AICc value): • Oribi population size • Suitable habitat • Stocking rates • Suitable habitat x stocking rates Population size, suitable habitat, stocking rates 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 Population growth rate (lambda) Population growth rate (lambda) 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 500 1000 1500 Oribi population size Suitable habitat (ha) 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Population growth rate (lambda) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stocking rate (ha/AU) Interaction between suitable habitat available & stocking rates vs. Lambda 1.0 0.8 Key Lambda (λ) 0.6 -0.2 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.0 1.0 -0.2 1 2 Population growth rate (lambda) rate growth Population 200 3 400 600 4 Suitable habitat800 (ha) 5 1000 1200 1400 1600 Stocking rates (ha/AU) Conclusion • What is the success rate of previous oribi relocations in KwaZulu-Natal? • Relocation success of 10% • Have relocations been a successful conservation tool for oribi? • No, but they can be successful • Require proper management prior to and post- relocation • Monitoring is very important: • Directly after the relocation • Long-term monitoring plans Conclusion • What are the factors driving the success/failure of these relocations? • Oribi population size • Availability of suitable habitat • Stocking rates of other mammalian herbivores • How can the success of relocations be improved in future? • To use the 10 points as a basic criteria prior to any relocation • To monitor oribi relocations over several years to be able to determine success/fail Management Recommendations • Intermediate sized populations should be relocated (>18 individuals in new area) • High availability of suitable habitat in the new area (>800 ha) • Stocking rates of 3.5 ha/AU • Recommended by the different Bioresource Groups from the Department of Agriculture .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Pending World Record Waterbuck Wins Top Honor SC Life Member Susan Stout Has in THIS ISSUE Dbeen Awarded the President’S Cup Letter from the President
    DSC NEWSLETTER VOLUME 32,Camp ISSUE 5 TalkJUNE 2019 Pending World Record Waterbuck Wins Top Honor SC Life Member Susan Stout has IN THIS ISSUE Dbeen awarded the President’s Cup Letter from the President .....................1 for her pending world record East African DSC Foundation .....................................2 Defassa Waterbuck. Awards Night Results ...........................4 DSC’s April Monthly Meeting brings Industry News ........................................8 members together to celebrate the annual Chapter News .........................................9 Trophy and Photo Award presentation. Capstick Award ....................................10 This year, there were over 150 entries for Dove Hunt ..............................................12 the Trophy Awards, spanning 22 countries Obituary ..................................................14 and almost 100 different species. Membership Drive ...............................14 As photos of all the entries played Kid Fish ....................................................16 during cocktail hour, the room was Wine Pairing Dinner ............................16 abuzz with stories of all the incredible Traveler’s Advisory ..............................17 adventures experienced – ibex in Spain, Hotel Block for Heritage ....................19 scenic helicopter rides over the Northwest Big Bore Shoot .....................................20 Territories, puku in Zambia. CIC International Conference ..........22 In determining the winners, the judges DSC Publications Update
    [Show full text]
  • Population, Distribution and Conservation Status of Sitatunga (Tragelaphus Spekei) (Sclater) in Selected Wetlands in Uganda
    POPULATION, DISTRIBUTION AND CONSERVATION STATUS OF SITATUNGA (TRAGELAPHUS SPEKEI) (SCLATER) IN SELECTED WETLANDS IN UGANDA Biological -Life history Biological -Ecologicl… Protection -Regulation of… 5 Biological -Dispersal Protection -Effectiveness… 4 Biological -Human tolerance Protection -proportion… 3 Status -National Distribtuion Incentive - habitat… 2 Status -National Abundance Incentive - species… 1 Status -National… Incentive - Effect of harvest 0 Status -National… Monitoring - confidence in… Status -National Major… Monitoring - methods used… Harvest Management -… Control -Confidence in… Harvest Management -… Control - Open access… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -Aim… Control of Harvest-in… Harvest Management -… Control of Harvest-in… Tragelaphus spekii (sitatunga) NonSubmitted Detrimental to Findings (NDF) Research and Monitoring Unit Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) Plot 7 Kira Road Kamwokya, P.O. Box 3530 Kampala Uganda Email/Web - [email protected]/ www.ugandawildlife.org Prepared By Dr. Edward Andama (PhD) Lead consultant Busitema University, P. O. Box 236, Tororo Uganda Telephone: 0772464279 or 0704281806 E-mail: [email protected] [email protected], [email protected] Final Report i January 2019 Contents ACRONYMS, ABBREVIATIONS, AND GLOSSARY .......................................................... vii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ....................................................................................................... viii 1.1Background ...........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Oribi Conservation
    www.forestryexplained.co.za SAVING SPECIES: ORIBI CONSERVATION Forestry Explained: Our Conservation Legacy Introducing the Oribi: South Africa’s most endangered antelope All photos courtesy of the Endangered Wildlife Trust (EWT) Slender, graceful and timid, the Oribi fact file: Oribi (Ourebia ourebi) is one of - Height: 50 – 67 cm South Africa’s most captivating antelope. Sadly, the Oribi’s - Weight: 12 – 22 kg future in South Africa is - Length: 92 -110 cm uncertain. Already recognised - Colour: Yellowish to orange-brown back as endangered in South Africa, its numbers are still declining. and upper chest, white rump, belly, chin and throat. Males have slender Oribi are designed to blend upright horns. into their surroundings and are - Habitat: Grassland region of South Africa, able to put on a turn of speed when required, making them KwaZulu-Natal, Eastern Cape, Free State perfectly adapted for life on and Mpumalanga. open grassland plains. - Diet: Selective grazers. GRASSLANDS: LINKING FORESTRY TO WETLANDS r ecosystems rive are Why is wetland conservation so ’s fo ica un r d important to the forestry industry? Af in h g t r u a o s of S s % Sou l 8 th f a 6 A o n is fr d o ic s .s a . 28% ' . s 2 . 497,100 ha t i 4 SAVANNAH m b e r p l Why they are South Africa’s most endangereda n t a 4% t i 65,000 ha o n FYNBOS s The once expansive Grassland Biome has halved in. size over the last few decades, with around 50% being irreversibly transformed as a result of 68% habitat destruction.
    [Show full text]
  • INCLUSIVE Namibia for Hunters Living in Europe Outside EU
    First Class Trophy Taxidermy - 2021 NAMIBIA ALL INCLUSIVE PRICE LIST (EURO) FOR HUNTERS LIVING IN EUROPE OUTSIDE EU TOTAL OVERVIEW (see breakdown for each type of mount on next pages) INCLUSIVE “DIP & PACK” IN NAMIBIA , EXPORT DOCUMENTS, VETERINARY INSPECTION, PACKING & CRATING, AIRFREIGHT FROM NAMIBIA INTO EU, EU IMPORT VAT, TRANSPORT TO FIRST CLASS TROPHY’S TAXIDERMY WORKSHOP, TAXIDERMY WORK, INSURANCE AND FINAL DELIVERY TO INCOMING AGENT IN HUNTERS COUNTRY (i.e. OSLO / ZURICH / LONDON) Tanning Full Tanning Back- Species Shoulder Mount Full Mount European Mount Skin skin Baboon 803 1.716 306 214 130 Barbersheep 1.047 3.757 442 261 153 Blesbock, Common 871 2.150 345 226 130 Blesbock, White 871 2.150 345 226 130 Bontebock 1.013 2.293 487 226 130 Buffalo 1.948 9.864 786 768 408 Bushbock 836 2.301 357 226 130 Bushpig 922 2.251 294 319 197 Civet cat 932 1.746 425 191 108 Cheetah 1.014 3.586 437 428 230 Crocodile < 2,5 meter N/A 3.132 N/A 1.156 N/A Crocodile 2,5 -3 meter N/A 3.647 N/A 1.288 N/A Crocodile 3- 4 meter NA 4.324 N/A 1.489 N/A Crocodile 4 -5 meter N/A 5.668 N/A 1.853 N/A Damara Dik-DIk 639 1.503 294 226 141 Duiker, Blue 657 1.523 294 226 141 Duiker, Grey 657 1.503 294 226 141 Giraffe/Giraf 4.000 POR N/A 1.884 1.051 Eland 1.806 11.004 643 641 330 Elephant POR POR POR POR POR Fallow Deer 978 3.707 382 251 130 Gemsbock/Oryx 1.184 4.535 403 428 286 Grysbock 736 1.309 294 238 141 Red Hartebeest 1.024 3.444 345 428 219 Hippo/Flodhest POR POR POR POR POR Hyena 948 3.171 448 358 164 Impala 866 2.665 357 261 153 Jackall 568 1.170 357 203
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring the Recovery of Wildlife in the Parque Nacional Da Gorongosa Through Aerial Surveys 2000
    Monitoring the recovery of wildlife in the Parque Nacional da Gorongosa through aerial surveys 2000 - 2012 A preliminary analysis Dr Marc Stalmans July 2012 Summary • A total of 7 aerial wildlife surveys have been undertaken from 2000 to 2012 in the Gorongosa National Park. These have been sampling surveys covering 9 to 22% of the Park. • The data of these 6 helicopter and 1 fixed-wing (2004) survey have not yet been fully analysed. The data were combined in a single data base of 15 083 individual species occurrence records. These data were also incorporated in a Geographic Information System. • The results clearly indicate that there has been since 2000 a significant increase in wildlife numbers for most species. The vast majority of the wildlife is found in the central and southern part of the fertile Rift Valley. However, densities are much lower in the infertile miombo in the east and west as well as in the Rift Valley closer to human habitation. Where higher levels of protection from illegal hunting are maintained, such as in the Sanctuario, higher densities of wildlife are now recorded even though the recovery started from similar low levels as in other parts of the Park. • The current sampling design has significant shortcomings that make the estimate of overall population numbers problematic, especially for species with relatively low numbers and a clumped distribution (e.g. buffalo and elephant). This makes it difficult to evaluate the current populations against historical wildlife numbers. • The current design is not considered good enough for the quality of data required for ecological research and for the auditing of management performance.
    [Show full text]
  • Redunca Arundinum – Southern Reedbuck
    Redunca arundinum – Southern Reedbuck Assessment Rationale Although this species has declined across much of its former range within the assessment region, subpopulations have been reintroduced throughout much of its range, with sizeable numbers on private land. The mature population size is at least 3,884 on both formally protected areas and private lands (2010–2015 counts), which is an underestimate as not all private sector data are available. The largest subpopulation (420–840 mature individuals) occurs in iSimangaliso Wetland Park in KwaZulu-Natal (KZN). Based on a sample of 21 protected areas across the range of Southern Reedbuck, the overall Andre Botha population has increased by c. 68–80% over three generations (1997/2002–2015), which is driven primarily by the Free State protected areas, which have Regional Red List status (2016) Least Concern* experienced an average annual growth rate of 18% National Red List status (2004) Least Concern between 2006 and 2014. In the absence of the growth in the Free State, there has been a net 10–22% decline in the Reasons for change No change remaining 11 protected areas. This species experiences Global Red List status (2016) Least Concern local declines as it is vulnerable to poaching, illegal sport hunting and persecution, and demand for live animals for TOPS listing (NEMBA) (2007) Protected trade (possibly illegally taken from the wild). Empirical CITES listing None data indicate declines in some protected areas in KZN and North West provinces due to poaching, and anecdotal Endemic No reports suggest more severe declines outside protected *Watch-list Data areas due to poaching, sport hunting and habitat loss or degradation.
    [Show full text]
  • Insights and Approaches Using Deep Learning to Classify Wildlife Zhongqi Miao1,2, Kaitlyn M
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Insights and approaches using deep learning to classify wildlife Zhongqi Miao1,2, Kaitlyn M. Gaynor 1, Jiayun Wang1, Ziwei Liu2, Oliver Muellerklein2,3, Mohammad Sadegh Norouzzadeh4, Alex McInturf1, Rauri C. K. Bowie 5, Ran Nathan6, 2,3 1,7 Received: 5 November 2018 Stella X. Yu & Wayne M. Getz Accepted: 17 May 2019 The implementation of intelligent software to identify and classify objects and individuals in visual Published: xx xx xxxx felds is a technology of growing importance to operatives in many felds, including wildlife conservation and management. To non-experts, the methods can be abstruse and the results mystifying. Here, in the context of applying cutting edge methods to classify wildlife species from camera-trap data, we shed light on the methods themselves and types of features these methods extract to make efcient identifcations and reliable classifcations. The current state of the art is to employ convolutional neural networks (CNN) encoded within deep-learning algorithms. We outline these methods and present results obtained in training a CNN to classify 20 African wildlife species with an overall accuracy of 87.5% from a dataset containing 111,467 images. We demonstrate the application of a gradient- weighted class-activation-mapping (Grad-CAM) procedure to extract the most salient pixels in the fnal convolution layer. We show that these pixels highlight features in particular images that in some cases are similar to those used to train humans to identify these species. Further, we used mutual information methods to identify the neurons in the fnal convolution layer that consistently respond most strongly across a set of images of one particular species.
    [Show full text]
  • Aspects of the Conservation of Oribi (Ourebia Ourebi) in Kwazulu-Natal
    Aspects ofthe conservation oforibi (Ourebia ourebi) in KwaZulu-Natal Rebecca Victoria Grey Submitted in partial fulfilment ofthe requirements for the degree of Master ofScience In the School ofBiological and Conservation Sciences At the University ofKwaZulu-Natal Pietermaritzburg November 2006 Abstract The oribi Ourebia ourebi is probably South Africa's most endangered antelope. As a specialist grazer, it is extremely susceptible to habitat loss and the transformation of habitat by development. Another major threat to this species is illegal hunting. Although protected and listed as an endangered species in South Africa, illegal poaching is widespread and a major contributor to decreasing oribi populations. This study investigated methods of increasing oribi populations by using translocations and reintroductions to boost oribi numbers and by addressing over­ hunting. Captive breeding has been used as a conservation tool as a useful way of keeping individuals of a species in captivity as a backup for declining wild populations. In addition, most captive breeding programmes are aimed at eventually being able to reintroduce certain captive-bred individuals back into the wild to supplement wild populations. This can be a very costly exercise and often results in failure. However, captive breeding is a good way to educate the public and create awareness for the species and its threats. Captive breeding of oribi has only been attempted a few times in South Africa, with varied results. A private breeding programme in Wartburg, KwaZulu-Natal was quite successful with the breeding of oribi. A reintroduction programme for these captive-bred oribi was monitored using radio telemetry to assess the efficacy ofsuch a programme for the oribi.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential Distributions, and Estimated Spatial Requirements And
    The potential distributions, and estimated spatial requirements and population sizes, of the medium to large-sized mammals in the planning domain of the Greater Addo Elephant National Park project A.F. BOSHOFF, G.I.H. KERLEY, R.M. COWLING and S.L. WILSON Boshoff, A.F., G.I.H. Kerley, R.M. Cowling and S.L. Wilson. 2002. The potential distri- butions, and estimated spatial requirements and population sizes, of the medium to large-sized mammals in the planning domain of the Greater Addo Elephant National Park project. Koedoe 45(2): 85–116. Pretoria. ISSN 0075-6458. The Greater Addo Elephant National Park project (GAENP) involves the establishment of a mega biodiversity reserve in the Eastern Cape, South Africa. Conservation planning in the GAENP planning domain requires systematic information on the potential distri- butions and estimated spatial requirements, and population sizes of the medium to large- sized mammals. The potential distribution of each species is based on a combination of literature survey, a review of their ecological requirements, and consultation with con- servation scientists and managers. Spatial requirements were estimated within 21 Mam- mal Habitat Classes derived from 43 Land Classes delineated by expert-based vegeta- tion and river mapping procedures. These estimates were derived from spreadsheet models based on forage availability estimates and the metabolic requirements of the respective mammal species, and that incorporate modifications of the agriculture-based Large Stock Unit approach. The potential population size of each species was calculat- ed by multiplying its density estimate with the area of suitable habitat. Population sizes were calculated for pristine, or near pristine, habitats alone, and then for these habitats together with potentially restorable habitats for two park planning domain scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation of Mini-Antelope: Proceedings of an International Symposium and on Duiker and Dwarf Antelope in Africa
    SPECIES CONCEPTS AND THE REAL DIVERSITY OF ANTELOPES F. P. D. COTTERILL Principal Curator of Vertebrates, Department of Mammalogy, Natural History Museum of Zimbabwe, P. O. Box 240, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe 2003. In A. Plowman (Ed.). Ecology and Conservation of Mini-antelope: Proceedings of an International Symposium and on Duiker and Dwarf Antelope in Africa. Filander Verlag: Füürth. pp. 59-118. Biodiversity Foundation for Africa, Secretariat: P O Box FM730, Famona, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe (Address for correspondence) email: [email protected] Abstract As for all biodiversity, society requires an accurate taxonomy of the Bovidae. We need to know what the different antelopes really are, and where these occur. Sound scientific, economic and aesthetic arguments underpin this rationale. This paper highlights some of the costs that result from the misconstrual of the real nature of species. Controversy reigns over which species concepts are most applicable to characterize biodiversity; a controversy magnified by how different species concepts create taxonomies of differing accuracy and precision. The contemporary taxonomy of the Mammalia continues to be based on the Biological Species Concept (BSC). Its deficiencies are too rarely acknowledged, and afflict apparently well known taxa of large mammals, notably the Bovidae. Errors in the BSC misconstrue natural patterns of diversity: recognizing too many (Type I errors), or too few species (Type II errors). Most insidious are Type III errors; where evolutionary relationships are misconstrued because the BSC cannot conceptualize, and thus ignores phylogenetic uniqueness. The general trend in current taxonomies of antelopes is to under represent true diversity - exemplified in the dikdiks (Type II errors). Misconstrual of phylogenetic relationships among species (Type III errors) appear rampant in these same taxonomies (the Cephalophini for example).
    [Show full text]
  • Species-Packing of Grazers in the Mole National Park, Ghana
    Species-Packing of Grazers in the Mole National Park, Ghana Dakwa, K. B. Department of Conservation Biology and Entomology School of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Coast, Ghana *Corresponding Author: [email protected] / [email protected] Abstract Hutchinson’s body weight ratio (WR) theory was used to determine the degree of species-packing of 22 species of grazers in Mole National Park (MNP). The hypotheses, which suggest that facilitation is more likely to occur at a WR greater than 2.0, competition at WR less than 2.0, and coexistence at WR equals 2.0 were tested by regressing the natural logarithm of the body mass of a grazer against its rank number in the grazer assemblage. The results indicated competition in the grazer assemblage at MNP as its WR is 1.40 and therefore grazers are tightly packed. However, as several species with similar body weight coexisted at MNP, the Hutchinson’s Rule could not be supported. Habitat heterogeneity rather than the size of conservation area related to species-packing and MNP with its low habitat heterogeneity showed a low degree of species-packing. Possible explanations have been advanced for existing ecological holes within the assemblage. Species-packing could still be a reasonable measure of the characteristics, dynamics, interactions and the patterns of assemble in animal communities. It could also be used to predict the effect of animal species loss or arrival on the stability of a natural ecosystem and provide useful guidelines in planning herbivore conservation measures in protected areas. Introduction in the assemblages of sympatric species in an area.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerial Wildlife Count of the Parque Nacional Da Gorongosa, Mozambique, October 2016
    Aerial wildlife count of the Parque Nacional da Gorongosa, Mozambique, October 2016 Approach, results and discussion Dr Marc Stalmans & Dr Mike Peel November 2016 Table of contents Summary 3 1. Survey methodology 6 1.1. Flight observations and recording 6 1.2. Data handling 7 2. Results 8 2.1. Survey statistics 8 2.2. Animal numbers recorded 11 2.3. Spatial distribution patterns 12 2.4. Wildlife biomass 21 2.5. Additional species records 22 2.6. Illegal activities 23 3. Discussion 24 3.1. Context with regard to the drought 24 3.2. Side-by-side comparison with 2014 26 4. Conclusion 29 5. References 30 6. Acknowledgements 31 2 Summary Table 1: total number of herbivores counted in 2016 in the count block and additional sample lines. • An aerial wildlife count of the Parque Nacional da Gorongosa was Total number Species conducted between 18 and 31 October 2016. counted • The focus was on the Rift Valley in the southern and central sector of Blue wildebeest 363 the park. A total of 184 500 hectares was fully covered by means of a Buffalo 696 helicopter. Systematic, parallel strips that were 500 m wide were Bushbuck 2 062 assessed. All large mammals observed were counted. All data, including Bushpig 115 geographical positions, were directly entered into a custom-made Common reedbuck 10 609 census programme. In addition to this count block, a distance of Duiker grey 61 respectively 100 and 125 km of transect lines were flown on the Duiker red 22 western and eastern side of the core count area.
    [Show full text]