Have Relocations Been a Successful Management Tool for the Conservation of Oribi Antelope in Kwazulu-Natal?

Have Relocations Been a Successful Management Tool for the Conservation of Oribi Antelope in Kwazulu-Natal?

Have relocations been a successful management tool for the conservation of oribi antelope in KwaZulu-Natal? Savanna Science Network Meeting: March 2016 © Keenan Stears Tamanna Patel, Dr. Adrian Shrader, Dr. Keenan Stears, Dr. Ian Little Oribi (Ourebia ourebi) • Highly specialized antelope • Grassland requirements • Numbers are declining in South Africa • Habitat loss & fragmentation • Illegal hunting & poaching • Current status: • Vulnerable Oribi Working Group • Monitor oribi population numbers through annual oribi surveys • Aims to promote the long term survival of oribi in their natural grassland habitats © Ian Little Relocations • What is a relocation? • Movement of an animal or population of animals from an area where they are currently threatened to a more suitable area • Successful relocations • Arabian oryx • White rhinoceros • Springbok Successful Relocation • Results in a self-sustaining population • Births observed every year • Increase in population number • Prior to relocation: • Basic set of criteria should be met: • Aims of the relocation should be defined clearly • Assessment of habitat suitability should be conducted • Post-relocation: • Long-term monitoring over several years Oribi Relocations? Key Questions 1. What is the success rate of previous oribi relocations in KwaZulu-Natal? 2. Have relocations been a successful conservation tool for oribi? 3. What are the factors driving the success/failure of these relocations? 4. How can the success of relocations be improved in future? Data Collection • 10 sites in KwaZulu-Natal with relocated oribi • 10 points to consider before any relocation (Pérez et al. 2012) • Trends at each site → Success/fail • Factors influencing success/failure → Additional questions Pérez et al. 2012 1. Is the population under threat? 2. Have threatening factors been removed/controlled? 3. Are relocations the best tool to use? 4. Are risks for the target species acceptable? 5. Are risks for other species/ecosystem acceptable? 6. Effects of the relocation acceptable to local people? 7. Does the project maximize the likelihood of establishing a viable population? 8. Does the project include clear goals and monitoring? 9. Do enough economic and human resources exist? 10. Do scientific, governmental & stakeholder groups support the relocation? 10 9 8 7 6 No. of sites of No. sites 5 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Points to consider (Pérez et al. 2012) The number of sites that considered each point before any relocation 10 9 8 7 6 No. of sites of No. sites 5 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Points to consider (Pérez et al. 2012) The number of sites that considered each point before any relocation Points that were overlooked at many of the sites: • Have threatening factors been removed or controlled? • Are risks for the target species acceptable? • Does the project maximize the likelihood of establishing a viable population? • Does the project include clear goals and monitoring? • Do enough economic and human resources exist? Success or Fail? 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 No. of No. Sites 2 1 0 Increasing Decreasing Stable Population Trend Number of criteria initially considered vs. Lambda 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 Population growth rate (lambda) 0.0 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of criteria considered Factors driving these trends • A model selection procedure based on small- sample corrected (second order) Akaike’s Information Criterion (AICc) values. • Generalized linear model: • Gamma distribution and a log link function • Best fit model (lowest AICc value): • Oribi population size • Suitable habitat • Stocking rates • Suitable habitat x stocking rates Population size, suitable habitat, stocking rates 2.5 2.5 2.0 2.0 1.5 1.5 1.0 1.0 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 Population growth rate (lambda) Population growth rate (lambda) 0 10 20 30 40 50 0 500 1000 1500 Oribi population size Suitable habitat (ha) 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 Population growth rate (lambda) 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stocking rate (ha/AU) Interaction between suitable habitat available & stocking rates vs. Lambda 1.0 0.8 Key Lambda (λ) 0.6 -0.2 0.0 0.4 0.2 0.4 0.2 0.6 0.8 0.0 1.0 -0.2 1 2 Population growth rate (lambda) rate growth Population 200 3 400 600 4 Suitable habitat800 (ha) 5 1000 1200 1400 1600 Stocking rates (ha/AU) Conclusion • What is the success rate of previous oribi relocations in KwaZulu-Natal? • Relocation success of 10% • Have relocations been a successful conservation tool for oribi? • No, but they can be successful • Require proper management prior to and post- relocation • Monitoring is very important: • Directly after the relocation • Long-term monitoring plans Conclusion • What are the factors driving the success/failure of these relocations? • Oribi population size • Availability of suitable habitat • Stocking rates of other mammalian herbivores • How can the success of relocations be improved in future? • To use the 10 points as a basic criteria prior to any relocation • To monitor oribi relocations over several years to be able to determine success/fail Management Recommendations • Intermediate sized populations should be relocated (>18 individuals in new area) • High availability of suitable habitat in the new area (>800 ha) • Stocking rates of 3.5 ha/AU • Recommended by the different Bioresource Groups from the Department of Agriculture .

View Full Text

Details

  • File Type
    pdf
  • Upload Time
    -
  • Content Languages
    English
  • Upload User
    Anonymous/Not logged-in
  • File Pages
    20 Page
  • File Size
    -

Download

Channel Download Status
Express Download Enable

Copyright

We respect the copyrights and intellectual property rights of all users. All uploaded documents are either original works of the uploader or authorized works of the rightful owners.

  • Not to be reproduced or distributed without explicit permission.
  • Not used for commercial purposes outside of approved use cases.
  • Not used to infringe on the rights of the original creators.
  • If you believe any content infringes your copyright, please contact us immediately.

Support

For help with questions, suggestions, or problems, please contact us