Cutaneous Vasculopathy As an Adverse Effect of the Anti–Vascular

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Cutaneous Vasculopathy As an Adverse Effect of the Anti–Vascular Letters OBSERVATION and several erosions (Figure 1). A punch biopsy was per- formed, and histologic analysis revealed a perivascular pre- Cutaneous Vasculopathy as an Adverse Effect dominantly lymphocytic infiltrate in the dermis and subcu- of the Anti–Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor tis (Figure 2A) as well as focal hemosiderin deposition and Agent Axitinib extravasated erythrocytes. The infiltrate was focally dense Axitinib is a targeted chemotherapeutic agent against the with lymphocytes within the vascular walls (Figure 2B), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor pathway. suggestive of a lymphocytic vasculopathy. Laboratory Cutaneous toxic effects of these newer targeted therapies are workup for other thrombotic, embolic, or vasculitic causes increasingly being recognized. Herein we present a case of was unrevealing. cutaneous vasculopathy associated with axitinib. His ulcerations were treated symptomatically with pet- rolatum ointment and occlusive dressings, topical lidocaine ReportofaCase| A white man in his 50s with metastatic renal ointment, and silver sulfadiazine cream but with minimal cell carcinoma presented 6 months after starting axitinib improvement. He was started on a prednisone taper, which therapy with painful lesions and discoloration on both feet. was discontinued owing to lack of improvement, as well as 1 He reported a burning sensation, exacerbated by prolonged week of strict bed rest and leg elevation. His lesions wors- periods of standing. On examination, he was found to have ened, showing increased discoloration, formation of new reticulated purpuric patches over the medial aspects of both bullae, and progression of erosions into deep painful ulcer- feet and the interdigital web spaces, with associated edema ations. The decision was made to hold axitinib treatment and initiate an empirical trial regimen of nifedipine, 20 mg, Figure 1. Cutaneous Lesions of the Left Foot in a Patient Receiving 3 times daily, and this was followed by slow improvement in Axitinib Therapy the lesions over the next month. The patient was rechal- lenged with axitinib, but 2 weeks later the lesions recurred, and so axitinib therapy was discontinued permanently. The lesions completely resolved over the next few weeks. The patient was subsequently started on ipilimumab therapy without recurrence of cutaneous symptoms. Discussion | Axitinib is a selective inhibitor against the VEGF receptor, approved for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma after failure of prior systemic therapy. Other well- established inhibitors with activity against VEGF include sorafenib and sunitinib. Adverse effects associated with these agents include hypertension, diarrhea, fatigue, hand- Initial presentation of reticulated, purpuric patches and associated edema that foot skin reaction (HFSR), and eruption.1 By far, the most affected both feet. common cutaneous toxic effect is HFSR, which occurs in Figure 2. Histopathologic Specimens From Left Medial Foot Lesion in a Patient Receiving Axitinib Therapy A Original magnification ×10 B Original magnification ×40 Hematoxylin-eosin–stained specimens show partial epidermal necrosis with parakeratosis, dermal fibrosis, perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate, and extravasated erythrocytes (A) and prominent perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with lymphocytes within the vascular wall (B). 222 JAMA Dermatology February 2016 Volume 152, Number 2 (Reprinted) jamadermatology.com Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All rights reserved. Downloaded From: https://jamanetwork.com/ on 10/01/2021 Letters approximately 20% to 30% of patients.1,2 Characteristically, 5. Jain L, Sissung TM, Danesi R, et al. Hypertension and hand-foot skin HFSR presents as painful, hyperkeratotic, erythematous reactions related to VEGFR2 genotype and improved clinical outcome following bevacizumab and sorafenib. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29:95. plaques on the palms and soles in areas subject to increased 6. Kiuru M, Schwartz M, Magro C. Cutaneous thrombogenic vasculopathy pressure. Other mucocutaneous effects described with anti- associated with bevacizumab therapy. Dermatol Online J. 2014;20(6): VEGF agents include keratoacanthoma, squamous cell carci- 13030/qt41f655g9. noma, splinter subungual hemorrhages, hair depigmenta- tion, and stomatitis.2 Both systemic and cutaneous toxic effects of axitinib are Intermittent Vismodegib Therapy consistent with other agents in the same class, with a signifi- in Basal Cell Nevus Syndrome cant incidence of HFSR.3,4 Hand-foot skin reaction has been The use of intermittent vismodegib therapy is a promising and proposed to result from blockade of VEGF receptor and platelet- sustainable medical alternative to the current mainstream sur- derived growth factor receptor in areas repeatedly subject to gical management of basal cell nevus syndrome (BCNS). We subclinical trauma, disrupting normal vascular repair pro- report our clinical experience with intermittent vismodegib cesses in fibroblasts and endothelial cells.4 While the acral le- therapy in 2 patients with BCNS. sions in the present patient were distinct from HFSR, it is pos- sible that a similar process was responsible. Inhibition of VEGF Report of Cases | Patient 1 is a white man in his 40s, and patient leads to increased vascular tone,1 and so dysregulated vaso- 2 is a white woman in her 50s. Vismodegib therapy was started constriction in the skin may disrupt normal tissue repair.4 In- in both cases because the basal cell carcinoma (BCC) lesions deed, hypertension in patients treated with concurrent in both patients were becoming more aggressive, were appear- sorafenib and bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody against ing more frequently, and could not be managed as easily with VEGF, was found to be a risk factor for developing HFSR.5 Va- surgical and other nonsurgical treatments. sodilatory agents such as nifedipine may therefore be useful The intermittent vismodegib dosing was first adminis- for both hypertension and cutaneous lesions. One patient tered to patient 1 circumstantially; adverse effects in his case treated with bevacizumab developed hemorrhagic ulcers and resulted in patient noncompliance with the prescribed non- purpuric patches on the lower legs, termed thrombogenic intermittent regimen. However, the dramatic improvement vasculopathy,6 further supporting a direct VEGF-mediated ef- prompted us to suggest intermittent therapy to both fect. In the midst of continued characterization of toxic ef- patients. The Table contains the dosing regimen, number of fects profiles of newer oncologic agents, our case represents BCCs before and after vismodegib therapy, and adverse a distinct cutaneous vasculopathy associated with the anti- effects. Both patients agreed to a lifelong intermittent vis- VEGF agent axitinib. modegib regimen but not lifelong continuous daily therapy owing to its adverse effects. The dosing interval was indi- Veronica J. Shi, BA vidualized to adverse-effect tolerability and so differs Anjela Galan, MD between our patients. Ian D. Odell, MD, PhD Jennifer N. Choi, MD Discussion | An autosomal dominant disorder, BCNS is typi- cally due to mutation of the PTCH1 tumor suppressor gene, re- Author Affiliations: Department of Dermatology, Yale University School of sulting in uncontrolled upregulation of the sonic hedgehog Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Shi, Galan, Odell, Choi); Department of pathway and carcinogenesis. Although surgical excisions of- Pathology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut (Galan). fer the highest cure rate and lowest rate of recurrence, the on- Corresponding Author: Jennifer N. Choi, MD, Department of Dermatology, going repetitive traumatic procedures cause cosmetic disfig- Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, Laboratory for Medicine and Pediatrics 5040, New Haven, CT 06510 ([email protected]). urement and lower patients’ quality of life. Vismodegib is an oral smoothened antagonist approved in Published Online: October 28, 2015. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2015.3209. 2012 by the US Food and Drug Administration for metastatic, Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported. locally advanced, or inoperable BCC. The adverse effects in- Additional Contributions: We are indebted to Edward W. Cowen, MD, MHSc, Dermatology Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, clude muscle spasms, alopecia, dysgeusia, weight loss, fa- National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, for discussion and tigue, nausea, and constipation. In addition, vismodegib is comments on the manuscript. Dr Cowen received no compensation for his embryotoxic and teratogenic. Barrier contraception was rec- contributions. ommended to our patients during and for 7 months after treat- 1. Cohen RB, Oudard S. Antiangiogenic therapy for advanced renal cell ment, and a second method of contraception was advised for carcinoma: management of treatment-related toxicities. Invest New Drugs. 2012;30(5):2066-2079. our female patient. 1 2. Ishak RS, Aad SA, Kyei A, Farhat FS. Cutaneous manifestations of Tang et al reported a dropout rate of 54% owing to anti-angiogenic therapy in oncology: review with focus on VEGF inhibitors. Crit adverse effects in a study of vismodegib treatment for Rev Oncol Hematol. 2014;90(2):152-164. patients with BCNS. The concept of drug holiday is sup- 3. Rini BI, Escudier B, Tomczak P, et al. Comparative effectiveness of axitinib ported by Ally et al,2 who found that 2 of 3 patients who took versus sorafenib in advanced renal cell
Recommended publications
  • Potential High-Impact Interventions Report Priority Area 02: Cancer
    AHRQ Healthcare Horizon Scanning System – Potential High-Impact Interventions Report Priority Area 02: Cancer Prepared for: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality U.S. Department of Health and Human Services 540 Gaither Road Rockville, MD 20850 www.ahrq.gov Contract No. HHSA290201000006C Prepared by: ECRI Institute 5200 Butler Pike Plymouth Meeting, PA 19462 December 2012 Statement of Funding and Purpose This report incorporates data collected during implementation of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) Healthcare Horizon Scanning System by ECRI Institute under contract to AHRQ, Rockville, MD (Contract No. HHSA290201000006C). The findings and conclusions in this document are those of the authors, who are responsible for its content, and do not necessarily represent the views of AHRQ. No statement in this report should be construed as an official position of AHRQ or of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This report’s content should not be construed as either endorsements or rejections of specific interventions. As topics are entered into the System, individual topic profiles are developed for technologies and programs that appear to be close to diffusion into practice in the United States. Those reports are sent to various experts with clinical, health systems, health administration, and/or research backgrounds for comment and opinions about potential for impact. The comments and opinions received are then considered and synthesized by ECRI Institute to identify interventions that experts deemed, through the comment process, to have potential for high impact. Please see the methods section for more details about this process. This report is produced twice annually and topics included may change depending on expert comments received on interventions issued for comment during the preceding 6 months.
    [Show full text]
  • Investigator Initiated Study IRB-29839 an Open-Label Pilot Study To
    Investigator Initiated Study IRB-29839 An open-label pilot study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination treatment of Sonidegib and BKM120 for the treatment of advanced basal cell carcinomas Version 05 September 2016 NCT02303041 DATE: 12Dec2018 1 Coordinating Center Stanford Cancer Center 875 Blake Wilbur Drive Stanford, CA 94305 And 450 Broadway, MC 5334 Redwood City, CA 94603 Protocol Director and Principal Investigator Anne Lynn S Chang, MD, Director of Dermatological Clinical Trials 450 Broadway St, MC 5334 Redwood City, CA 94603 [email protected] Co-Investigator Anthony Oro, MD PhD 450 Broadway St, MC 5334 Redwood City, CA 94603 [email protected] Biostatistician Shufeng Li, MS 450 Broadway St, MC 5334 Redwood City, CA 94603 [email protected] Study Coordinator Ann Moffat 450 Broadway St, MC 5334 Redwood City, CA 94603 [email protected] 2 Table of Contents 1 Background ................................................................. 7 1.1 Disease Background ..................................................... 7 1.2 Hedgehog Pathway and mechanism of action ............................... 7 1.3 PI3K Pathway and mechanism of action ................................... 9 1.4 Sonidegib Compound Information ............ Error! Bookmark not defined. 1.4.1 Preclinical Studies for Sonidegib ....................................................................11 1.4.2 Muscular system...............................................................................................13 1.4.3 Skeletal system ................................................................................................13
    [Show full text]
  • Genomic Oncology: Moving Beyond the Tip of the Iceberg Jane De Lartigue, Phd
    FeatureCommunity Report Genomic oncology: moving beyond the tip of the iceberg Jane de Lartigue, PhD istorically, cancer has been diagnosed and in patients with lung cancer, even the most efec- treated on the basis of the tissue of ori- tive targeted therapies can fail if used in the wrong Hgin. Te promise of personalized therapy, patient population.5,6 matched more precisely to an individual’s tumor, In recognition of this issue, the oncology feld has was ushered in with the development of molecularly developed molecular biomarkers that can predict targeted therapies, based on a greater understanding response, or lack thereof, to targeted therapy. Drugs of cancer as a genomic-driven disease. Here, we dis- are now commonly being evaluated in trials that cuss some of the evolution of genomic oncology, the select eligible patients on the basis of biomarker pos- inherent complexities and challenges, and how novel itivity, and a number of companion diagnostics have clinical trial designs are among the strategies being been codeveloped to assist in these eforts (Table 1). developed to address them and shape the future of Notable successes include the development of the personalized medicine in cancer. monoclonal antibody trastuzumab for patients with breast cancers that have human epidermal growth The evolution of genomic oncology factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene amplifcation or In the 15 years since the frst map of the human HER2 protein overexpression,7 and the small mol- genome emerged, genetics has become an inte- ecule BRAF kinase inhibitor
    [Show full text]
  • Overcoming the Challenges of Oral Oncolytic Therapies with a Specialized Crew
    Navigating Safely Through Uncharted Waters: Overcoming the Challenges of Oral Oncolytic Therapies with a Specialized Crew Mitchell E. Hughes, PharmD, BCPS, BCOP Clinical Pharmacy Specialist-Hematology/Oncology The Abramson Cancer Center for Advanced Medicine at Penn Medicine Objectives At the completion of this activity, the participant will be able to: 1. List risks associated with dispensing oral oncolytic agent 2. Recognize potential barriers to implementation of a vigilance program for oral oncolytic agents 3. Discuss strategies to improve safety and communications involved with dispensing oral oncolytic agents 2 Disclosure “I have not received any commercial or financial support for this program” 3 Oral Chemotherapy Definition “Any drug you take by mouth to treat cancer. Oral chemo is not given to you with a needle. It’s a liquid or pill that you swallow.” “Chemo you swallow is as strong as other forms of chemo and works just as well. You take oral chemo at home” “But oral chemo drugs cost a lot” –The American Cancer Society 4 Image available from: https://localtvwiti.files.wordpress.com/2014/03/chemo-pills.jpg?quality=85&strip=all https://www.cancer.org/treatment/treatments-and-side-effects/treatment-types/chemotherapy/oral-chemotherapy.html Misconceptions Oral chemotherapy is less toxic than intravenous (IV) chemotherapy Oral chemotherapy requires less monitoring than IV Patients will be able to start therapy the day oral chemotherapy is prescribed Oral chemotherapy does not involve any hazardous precautions 5 Image available
    [Show full text]
  • An Investigator-Initiated Open-Label Trial of Sonidegib in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Patients Resistant to Vismodegib Christina Danial, Kavita Y
    Published OnlineFirst November 6, 2015; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1588 Clinical Trial Brief Report Clinical Cancer Research An Investigator-Initiated Open-Label Trial of Sonidegib in Advanced Basal Cell Carcinoma Patients Resistant to Vismodegib Christina Danial, Kavita Y. Sarin, Anthony E. Oro, and Anne Lynn S. Chang Abstract Purpose: To assess the tumor response to the smoothened sive disease with sonidegib. Three patients experienced stable (SMO) inhibitor, sonidegib (LDE225), in patients with an disease and discontinued sonidegib either due to adverse events advanced basal cell carcinoma (BCC) resistant to treatment with (n ¼ 1) or due to election for surgery (n ¼ 2). The response of one vismodegib (GDC0449). patient was not evaluable. SMO mutations with in vitro data Experimental Design: Nine patients with an advanced suggesting resistance to Hh pathway inhibition were identified BCC that was previously resistant to treatment with vismode- in 5 patients, and none of these patients experienced responses gib were given sonidegib in this investigational, open- while on sonidegib. label study. Tumor response was determined using the Conclusion: Patients with advanced BCCs that were response evaluation criteria in solid tumors. SMO mutations previously resistant to treatment with vismodegib similarly were identified using biopsy samples from the target BCC demonstrated treatment resistance with sonidegib. Patients location. who have developed treatment resistance to an SMO inhibitor Results: The median duration of treatment with sonidegib was may continue to experience tumor progression in response to 6 weeks (range, 3–58 weeks). Five patients experienced progres- other SMO inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res; 1–5. Ó2015 AACR. Introduction Sonidegib (LDE225) is a new SMO inhibitor approved in 2015 by the FDA for locally advanced BCCs.
    [Show full text]
  • Combination of Ponatinib with Hedgehog Antagonist Vismodegib for Therapy-Resistant BCR-ABL1–Positive Leukemia
    Published OnlineFirst January 14, 2013; DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-12-1777 Clinical Cancer Cancer Therapy: Preclinical Research See related commentary by Dao and Tyner, p. 1309 Combination of Ponatinib with Hedgehog Antagonist Vismodegib for Therapy-Resistant BCR-ABL1–Positive Leukemia Seiichiro Katagiri1, Tetsuzo Tauchi1, Seiichi Okabe1, Yosuke Minami2, Shinya Kimura3, Taira Maekawa4, Tomoki Naoe2, and Kazuma Ohyashiki1 Abstract Purpose: The Hedgehog signaling pathway is a key regulator of cell growth and differentiation during development. Whereas the Hedgehog pathway is inactive in most normal adult tissues, Hedgehog pathway reactivation has been implicated in the pathogenesis of several neoplasms including BCR-ABL1–positive leukemia. The clear link between the Hedgehog pathway and BCR-ABL1–positive leukemia led to an effort to identify small molecules to block the pathway. Experimental Design: We investigated the combined effects of vismodegib and ponatinib, a pan-ABL1 kinase inhibitor, in nonobese diabetic/severe-combined immunodeficiency (NOD/SCID) repopulating T315I BCR-ABL1–positive cells in vitro and in vivo. Results: We observed that combination with vismodegib and ponatinib helps to eliminate therapy- resistant NOD/SCID repopulating T315I BCR-ABL1–positive cells. The percentage of CD19-positive leukemia cells in peripheral blood was significantly lower in vismodegib þ ponatinib–treated mice than that of the vehicle or ponatinib alone (P < 0.001). Spleen weights were also lower in vismodegib þ ponatinib–treated mice than in ponatinib alone (P < 0.05). Overall tumor burden, as assessed by BCR-ABL mRNA from bone marrow cells, was significantly lower in vismodegib þ ponatinib–treated mice than in ponatinib alone (P < 0.005).
    [Show full text]
  • Imatinib (Gleevec™)
    Biologicals What Are They? When Did All of this Happen? There are Clear Benefits. Are there also Risks? Brian J Ward Research Institute of the McGill University Health Centre Global Health, Immunity & Infectious Diseases Grand Rounds – March 2016 Biologicals Biological therapy involves the use of living organisms, substances derived from living organisms, or laboratory-produced versions of such substances to treat disease. National Cancer Institute (USA) What Effects Do Steroids Have on Immune Responses? This is your immune system on high dose steroids projects.accessatlanta.com • Suppress innate and adaptive responses • Shut down inflammatory responses in progress • Effects on neutrophils, macrophages & lymphocytes • Few problems because use typically short-term Virtually Every Cell and Pathway in Immune System ‘Target-able’ (Influenza Vaccination) Reed SG et al. Nature Medicine 2013 Nakaya HI et al. Nature Immunology 2011 Landscape - 2013 Antisense (30) Cell therapy (69) Gene Therapy (46) Monoclonal Antibodies (308) Recombinant Proteins (93) Vaccines (250) Other (81) http://www.phrma.org/sites/default/files/pdf/biologicsoverview2013.pdf Therapeutic Category Drugs versus Biologics Patented Ibuprofen (Advil™) Generic Ibuprofen BioSimilars/BioSuperiors ? www.drugbank.ca Patented Etanercept (Enbrel™) BioSimilar Etanercept Etacept™ (India) Biologics in Cancer Therapy Therapeutic Categories • Hormonal Therapy • Monoclonal antibodies • Cytokine therapy • Classical vaccine strategies • Adoptive T-cell or dendritic cells transfer • Oncolytic
    [Show full text]
  • Access to Cancer Medicines in Australia
    Access to cancer medicines in Australia Medicines Australia Oncology Industry Taskforce July 2013 Contents Glossary ..................................................................................................................................... i Executive summary .................................................................................................................... i 1 Background ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose of this report ....................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Methods ........................................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Report structure ............................................................................................................... 9 2 Cancer in Australia and other countries ......................................................................... 10 2.1 Population statistics on cancer ........................................................................................ 10 2.2 Population impacts of cancer in Australia ........................................................................ 24 2.3 Summary ........................................................................................................................ 33 3 Current and future cancer medicines ............................................................................ 34 3.1 Current
    [Show full text]
  • Session #3 Mfoflox-6 FOLFIRI ± Bevacizumab
    Management of Patients Receiving Oral Chemotherapy Siu Fun Wong, PharmD, FASHP, FCSHP Professor and Associate Dean Chapman University School of Pharmacy (CUSP) Irvine, CA Disclosure I have no conflict of interest . Objectives At the end of the presentation, the participants will be able to: 1. Recognize the difference in care required by patients receiving parenteral vs. oral chemotherapy 2. Deliver personalized care to patients receiving oral chemotherapy 3. Provide appropriate education relating to oral chemotherapy to patients and/or caregivers. Types of Oral Anti-cancer Chemotherapy Cytotoxic Agents Hormone Agents Immunomodulators Differentiating Agents Targeted Therapy Paradigm Change The rise in the use of oral oncology drugs represents a major shift in the management of patient . Directly observed treatment to unsupervised self- administration setting . Intermittent to daily chronic therapy . Perception of less toxicity with oral route of administration – both patients and providers1 . Patient preference due to convenience without compromise for efficacy2 . Provider preference, especially in palliative or adjuvant setting where QOL is paramount3 1Sharma S & Saltz LB. The Oncologist 2000; 5:99-107 2 Liu G et al. J Clin Oncol1997; 15(1):110-115 3 Benjamin et al. Eur J Cancer 2012;48(6):912-920 Goal How to empower patients to take the right dose at the right time under the right circumstances and to complete the treatment !! Effective Use and Monitoring Key (Unique) Elements to Consider Drug Administration Drug Interactions – Pharmacogenomics
    [Show full text]
  • Making Models More Accessible to Decision Makers
    11th November 2014 Making models more accessible to decision makers Michael Barry, PhD National Centre for Pharmacoeconomics, Dublin 11th November 2014 The NCPE conducts the health technology assessment (HTA) of pharmaceutical products for the Health Service Executive Recommendations on 192 medicines for 208 indications 3rd November 2014 1 11th November 2014 The HTA process The process begins with the price Rapid review to application by the determine whether a manufacturer full HTA is required Full HTA with a 90 day time frame NCPE submission to the HSE – CPU. This report will be considered by the New Drugs Group Committee 11th November 2014 Economic evaluations conducted in the Irish healthcare setting are usually in the form of CEA or CUA. Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) e.g. COST/LYG Cost-utility analysis (CUA) e.g. COST/QALY 2 11th November 2014 Cost-effectiveness threshold The line passing through the origin represents our ‘acceptable’ cost- effectiveness ratio. That is our maximum (or threshold) willingness-to-pay for a unit of effect ( life year or QALY). Cost (€) Q4 Q1 Effect (QALY) Q3 Q2 The QALY threshold to be used in the HTA process is € 45,000/QALY 11th November 2014 Number of products reviewed by the NCPE 2006 - 2014 3 11th November 2014 We will read through the HTA submission ……carefully ! 11th November 2014 Products reviewed in 2014 • HTA not required = 24 (44%) • Reimbursement recommended = 5 (9%) • Full HTA required = 12 (22%) • Reimbursement not recommended = 13 (24%) 5 at the submitted price & 7 oncology products
    [Show full text]
  • Cell Plasticity and Prostate Cancer: the Role of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition in Tumor Progression, Invasion, Metastasis and Cancer Therapy Resistance
    cancers Review Cell Plasticity and Prostate Cancer: The Role of Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition in Tumor Progression, Invasion, Metastasis and Cancer Therapy Resistance Sofia Papanikolaou, Aikaterini Vourda, Spyros Syggelos and Kostis Gyftopoulos * Department of Anatomy, University of Patras School of Medicine, Rion, 26504 Patras, Greece; [email protected] (S.P.); [email protected] (A.V.); [email protected] (S.S.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Simple Summary: Although epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a well-known cellular process involved during normal embryogenesis and wound healing, it also has a dark side; it is a complex process that provides tumor cells with a more aggressive phenotype, facilitating tumor metastasis and even resistance to therapy. This review focuses on the key pathways of EMT in the pathogenesis of prostate cancer and the development of metastases and evasion of currently available treatments. Abstract: Prostate cancer, the second most common malignancy in men, is characterized by high heterogeneity that poses several therapeutic challenges. Epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a dynamic, reversible cellular process which is essential in normal embryonic morphogenesis and Citation: Papanikolaou, S.; Vourda, wound healing. However, the cellular changes that are induced by EMT suggest that it may also A.; Syggelos, S.; Gyftopoulos, K. Cell play a central role in tumor progression, invasion, metastasis, and resistance to current therapeutic Plasticity and Prostate Cancer: The options. These changes include enhanced motility and loss of cell–cell adhesion that form a more Role of Epithelial–Mesenchymal aggressive cellular phenotype. Moreover, the reverse process (MET) is a necessary element of the Transition in Tumor Progression, Invasion, Metastasis and Cancer metastatic tumor process.
    [Show full text]
  • Erivedge™ (Vismodegib)
    Drug Policy: Erivedge™ (vismodegib) POLICY NUMBER SUBJECT DEPT/PROGRAM PAGE 1 OF 2 UM ONC_1222 Erivedge™ (vismodegib) UM Dept DATES COMMITTEE REVIEWED APPROVAL DATE EFFECTIVE DATE COMMITTEE APPROVAL DATES 10/03/12, 12/11/13, 03/16/15, January 13, 2021 January 29, 2021 (latest version listed last) 05/24/16, 03/05/17, 03/08/18, 10/03/12, 12/11/13, 03/16/15, 05/24/16, 03/05/17, 03/07/19, 12/11/19, 03/11/20, 03/08/18, 03/07/19, 12/11/19, 03/11/20, 01/13/21 01/13/21 PRIMARY BUSINESS OWNER: UM COMMITTEE/BOARD APPROVAL Utilization Management Committee URAC STANDARDS NCQA STANDARDS ADDITIONAL AREAS OF IMPACT HUM 1 UM 2 CMS REQUIREMENTS STATE/FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS APPLICABLE LINES OF BUSINESS Commercial, Exchange, Medicaid I. PURPOSE To define and describe the accepted indications for Erivedge (vismodegib) usage in the treatment of cancer, including FDA approved indications, and off-label indications. New Century Health (NCH) is responsible for processing all medication requests from network ordering providers. Medications not authorized by NCH may be deemed as not approvable and therefore not reimbursable. The use of this drug must be supported by one of the following: FDA approved product labeling, CMS-approved compendia, National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) clinical guidelines, or peer-reviewed literature that meets the requirements of the CMS Medicare Benefit Policy Manual Chapter 15. II. INDICATIONS FOR USE/INCLUSION CRITERIA A. PREFERRED MEDICATION GUIDANCE FOR INITIAL REQUEST: 1. When health plan Medicaid coverage provisions—including any applicable PDLs (Preferred Drug Lists)—conflict with the coverage provisions in this drug policy, health plan Medicaid coverage provisions take precedence per the Preferred Drug Guidelines OR 2.
    [Show full text]