The Anatomy of a Shark Attack: a Case Report and Review of the Literature
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Dentist Helps 'Soul Surfer' Regain Her Smile
September 19, 2011 Dentist helps ‘Soul Surfer’ regain her smile By Stacie Crozier, ADA News staff Manhattan Beach, Calif.—When 13-year-old surfer Bethany Hamilton lost her left arm in a shark attack off the North Shore of the Hawaiian island of Kauai on Halloween day 2003, a dentist some 2,600 miles away felt a calling to reach out to the girl—surfer to surfer. Dentist and surfer: Dr. Patrick Turley rides a wave. “It struck me when I saw her on a talk show that she was a 13-year-old girl and I was just blown away by what a strong young woman she was,” said Dr. Patrick Turley, a Manhattan Beach, Calif., orthodontist. “I’ve been a surfer all my life. When you’re out there there’s a little part of you that wonders what’s under the water. It strikes a special chord. Every surfer thinks about the possibility of a shark attack, but also that it’s only a one in a million chance.” Bethany’s story of survival and return to professional surfing has captured the attention and hearts of people around the world. Her story was featured in the 2011 film, “Soul Surfer.” The now 21-year-old surfer, public speaker, author and philanthropist chronicles her life, her faith in God and her busy schedule via her website, www.bethanyhamilton.com. She is the inspiration for the Friends of Bethany Hamilton (www.friendsofbethany.com), a nonprofit charitable organization with a mission to “support shark attack survivors and amputees worldwide and to present inspiring life stories through movies, projects and activities.” A few months after the attack, Dr. -
Global Shark Attack Hotspots: Identifying Underlying Factors Behind Increased Unprovoked Shark Bite Incidence
See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/308601225 Global shark attack hotspots: Identifying underlying factors behind increased unprovoked shark bite incidence Article in Ocean & Coastal Management · December 2016 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2016.09.010 CITATIONS READS 0 347 2 authors: Blake Kristin Harahush Daryl Mcphee Blake Chapman Communication Bond University 8 PUBLICATIONS 89 CITATIONS 32 PUBLICATIONS 392 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE All content following this page was uploaded by Daryl Mcphee on 26 September 2016. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. All in-text references underlined in blue are added to the original document and are linked to publications on ResearchGate, letting you access and read them immediately. Ocean & Coastal Management 133 (2016) 72e84 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Ocean & Coastal Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ocecoaman Global shark attack hotspots: Identifying underlying factors behind increased unprovoked shark bite incidence * Blake K. Chapman , Daryl McPhee Faculty of Society and Design, Bond University, Robina, Queensland, Australia article info abstract Article history: Unprovoked shark bite remains a rare, unlikely occurrence; however, shark bite incidence is increasing Received 22 October 2015 world-wide. In an effort to understand why shark bite incidence is increasing, we examine recent trends Received in revised form in unprovoked shark bite statistics and other media from the six global shark bite “hotspots”, the United 31 August 2016 States, South Africa, Australia, Brazil, Reunion Island and the Bahamas, and review recent literature that Accepted 15 September 2016 identifies potential causative factors that may contribute to rising shark bite incidence. -
Mcphee Head – Higher Degree Research Today…
What Causes Clusters of Unprovoked Shark Bites? Associate Professor Daryl McPhee Head – Higher Degree Research Today….. • A brief introduction to trends in unprovoked shark bite. • Discussion of a number of factors which may influence the location and timing of bite clusters. • What can be done? Global Trends in Unprovoked Shark Bites (1982-2012) 90 y = 2.0494x - 4043.7 80 R² = 0.90093 70 60 50 40 30 20 No. of Unprovoked Shark Bites 10 0 1982 1987 1992 1997 2002 2007 2012 Year Source: McPhee (2014) Unprovoked Shark Bites: Are They Becoming More Prevalent? Coastal Management 42(5): 478-492. We fear what our ancestral history has prepared us to fear. Four We fear influences on We fear what what’s our we cannot immediate. intuitions control about fear. We fear what’s most readily available in memory. Source: Dr Alison Kock, Cape Town Shark Spotters Program Why the Clusters? • Compare the cognitive need for a single reason with reality. – There is no single factor that explains the occurrence of a cluster of shark bites. – There is no effective predictive tool. – There are a range of factors operating at a several different scales that are inter-related. Why the Clusters? Human population increase? Per Capita Trends in Unprovoked Shark Bite in Australia 0.8 0.7 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 Shark attack per 100,000 people 0.1 0 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 Chapman, B.K and McPhee, D.P. (2016) Global shark attack hotspots: Identifying underlying factors behind increased unprovoked shark bite incidence. -
SHARKS an Inquiry Into Biology, Behavior, Fisheries, and Use DATE
$10.00 SHARKS An Inquiry into Biology, Behavior, Fisheries, and Use DATE. Proceedings of the Conference Portland, Oregon USA / October 13-15,1985 OF OUT IS information: PUBLICATIONcurrent most THIS For EM 8330http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog / March 1987 . OREGON STATG UNIVERSITY ^^ GXTENSION S€RVIC€ SHARKS An Inquiry into Biology, Behavior, Fisheries, and Use Proceedings of a Conference Portland, Oregon USA / October 13-15,1985 DATE. Edited by Sid Cook OF Scientist, Argus-Mariner Consulting Scientists OUT Conference Sponsors University of Alaska Sea Grant MarineIS Advisory Program University of Hawaii Sea Grant Extension Service Oregon State University Extension/Sea Grant Program University of Southern California Sea Grant Program University of Washington Sea Grant Marine Advisory Program West Coast Fisheries Development Foundation Argus-Mariner Consulting Scientistsinformation: PUBLICATIONcurrent EM 8330 / March 1987 most THISOregon State University Extension Service For http://extension.oregonstate.edu/catalog TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction, Howard Horton 1 Why, Are We Talking About Sharks? Bob Schoning 3 Shark Biology The Importance of Sharks in Marine Biological Communities Jose Castro.. 11 Estimating Growth and Age in Sharks Gregor Cailliet 19 Telemetering Techniques for Determining Movement Patterns in SharksDATE. abstract Donald Nelson 29 Human Impacts on Shark Populations Thomas Thorson OF 31 Shark Behavior Understanding Shark Behavior Arthur MyrbergOUT 41 The Significance of Sharks in Human Psychology Jon Magnuson 85 Pacific Coast Shark Attacks: What is theIS Danger? abstract Robert Lea... 95 The Forensic Study of Shark Attacks Sid Cook 97 Sharks and the Media Steve Boyer 119 Recent Advances in Protecting People from Dangerous Sharks abstract Bernard Zahuranec information: 127 Shark Fisheries and Utilization U.S. -
How Sharks and Shark–Human Interactions Are Reported in Major Australian Newspapers
sustainability Article How Sharks and Shark–Human Interactions are Reported in Major Australian Newspapers Nigel Hardiman 1, Shelley Burgin 2,* and Jia Shao 3 1 School of Strategy and Leadership, Faculty of Business and Law, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK; [email protected] 2 School of Science, Western Sydney University, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith 2751, Australia 3 SIGMA and Centre for Financial and Corporate Integrity, Coventry University, Coventry CV1 5FB, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 3 March 2020; Accepted: 26 March 2020; Published: 29 March 2020 Abstract: Few phrases evoke more negative emotion, or generate more media coverage, than ‘shark attack’ despite the few deaths that have been attributed to shark bite. Typically, tabloids are considered to provide more sensational coverage than broadsheets. We investigated how sharks and shark–human interactions were portrayed in four major Australian newspapers during a period of a record number of shark attacks in Australian waters. There was strong focus on human risk from sharks, and over-reportage of negative aspects. Thirty incidents were recorded: two fatal, 20 injury, and eight ‘near-miss’. Of 309 ‘shark’ articles surveyed, 24% mentioned fatalities (65% occurred prior to the study, some decades earlier). Injury was reported in 40% of articles, and ‘near-miss’ in 33% (89% related to an incident in South Africa involving an Australian surfing celebrity). The tabloid, Telegraph, published substantially more shark-related articles and photographs than other newspapers. There was otherwise no consistent pattern of difference between genre or newspapers. Keywords: biased reporting; anthropogenic focus; shark incidents; shark attacks; news media bias; genre bias reporting; shark conservation; marine ecosystems; ‘fake news’ We are not afraid of predators, we’re transfixed by them, prone to weave stories and fables and chatter endlessly about them ::: (E.O. -
Wilco Prins Rip Curl Ceo Skateboarding's Lost
ISSUE #078. AUGUST/ SEPTEMBER 2015. €5 WILCO PRINS RIP CURL CEO SKATEBOARDING’S LOST GENERATION SUP FOCUS & RED PADDLE’S JOHN HIBBARD BRAND PROFILES, BUYER SCIENCE & MUCH MORE. TREND REPORTS: ACTION CAMS & ACCESSORIES, ACTIVEWEAR, LONGBOARDS, LUGGAGE & RUCKSACKS, SUNGLASSES, SUP, SURF APPAREL, WATCHES, WETSUITS. US HELLO #78 The boardsports industry has been through searching for huge volumes, but are instead Editor Harry Mitchell Thompson a time of change and upheaval since the looking for quality and repeat custom. And if a [email protected] global financial crisis coincided with brands customer buys a good technical product from a realizing the volume of product they had been brand, this creates loyalty. Surf & French Editor Iker Aguirre manufacturing was far too large. [email protected] Customer loyalty also extends to retail, where Since then it has been sink or swim, and one retailer’s satisfaction with a wetsuit, a Snowboard Editor Rémi Forsans Rip Curl are a brand who has come out with sunglass, SUP or longboard can equate to [email protected] their head well above water. For this issue large orders and given the right sales support of SOURCE, Rip Curl’s European CEO Wilco and payment terms will be the beginning (or Skate Editor Dirk Vogel Prins tells us how the company has thinned continuation) of a fruitful relationship. [email protected] its product lines by 50% and has executed a strategy, segmenting their lines to fit their SOURCE #78’s trend reports break down the German Editor Anna Langer consumer with a high amount of technical ever increasing amount of product information [email protected] innovation, guaranteed quality and with the available, as our experts review what’s worth stories being told by some of the finest athletes a punt for SS16 in everything from wetsuits SUP Editor Robert Etienne in their field. -
The Shark's Electric Sense
BIOLOGY CREDIT © 2007 SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, INC. LEMON SHARK chomps down on an unlucky fish. THE SHARK’S SENSE An astonishingly sensitive detector of electric fields helps sharks zero in on prey By R. Douglas Fields menacing fin pierced the surface such as those animal cells produce when in KEY CONCEPTS and sliced toward us. A great blue contact with seawater. But how they use ■ Sharks and related fish can shark—three meters in length— that unique sense had yet to be proved. We sense the extremely weak homed in on the scent of blood like a torpe- were on that boat to find out. electric fields emitted by animals in the surrounding do. As my wife, Melanie, and I watched sev- Until the 1970s, scientists did not even water, an ability few other eral large sharks circle our seven-meter Bos- suspect that sharks could perceive weak organisms possess. ton Whaler, a silver-blue snout suddenly electric fields. Today we know that such elec- ■ This ability is made possible thrust through a square cutout in the boat troreception helps the fish find food and can by unique electrosensory deck. “Look out!” Melanie shouted. We operate even when environmental condi- structures called ampullae both recoiled instinctively, but we were in tions render the five common senses—sight, of Lorenzini, after the 17th- no real danger. The shark flashed a jagged smell, taste, touch, hearing—all but useless. century anatomist who first smile of ivory saw teeth and then slipped It works in turbid water, total darkness and described them. back into the sea. -
Response of White Sharks Exposed to Newly Developed Personal Shark Deterrents
Response of white sharks exposed to newly developed personal shark deterrents C Huveneers1, S Whitmarsh1, M Thiele1, C May1, L Meyer1, A Fox2 and CJA Bradshaw1 1College of Science and Engineering, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia 2Fox Shark Research Foundation, Adelaide, South Australia Photo: Andrew Fox 1 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS 2. List of figures ................................................................................................................. 3 3. List of tables ................................................................................................................... 5 4. Acknowledgements ........................................................................................................ 6 5. Executive Summary ....................................................................................................... 7 6. Introduction .................................................................................................................... 8 7. Methods ....................................................................................................................... 11 7.1 Study species and site .......................................................................................... 11 7.2 Deterrent set-up .................................................................................................... 11 7.3 Field sampling ....................................................................................................... 12 7.4 Video processing and filtering .............................................................................. -
(12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,383,138 B2 Drew (45) Date of Patent: Feb
USOO8383138B2 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 8,383,138 B2 Drew (45) Date of Patent: Feb. 26, 2013 (54) SHARK REPELLING METHOD (58) Field of Classification Search ........................ None See application file for complete search history. (76) Inventor: Anthony Neville Drew, London (GB) (56) References Cited *) NotOt1Ce: Subjubject to anyy d1Sclaimer,disclai theh term off thisthi patent is extended or adjusted under 35 U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS U.S.C. 154(b) by 1221 days. 3,755,064 A * 8, 1973 Maierson ....... ... 428,338 5,069,406 A * 12/1991 Colyer et al. ... 248,156 5,127,860 A * 7/1992 Kraft .............. ... 441774 (21) Appl. No.: 12/140,998 5,891,919 A * 4/1999 Blum et al. ... 514,625 2004/0067702 A1* 4/2004 Thornburg ...................... 441/74 (22) Filed: Jun. 17, 2008 * cited by examiner (65) Prior Publication Data Primary Examiner – Debbie K Ware US 2009/OO61O12 A1 Mar. 5, 2009 (57) ABSTRACT (30) Foreign Application Priority Data A method of repelling sharks for limiting their attacking a Surfboard user comprises applying a conventional Surfboard Jun. 24, 2007 (GB) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - O712142.9 traction improving solid wax that also incorporates a shark repellent Such as a surfactant, a capsaicinoid or a semio (51) Int. Cl. chemical in a concentration based on the “Johnson & Bald AOIN 25/00 (2006.01) ridge Test'. The extent of application is consequently suffi AOIN 25/08 (2006.01) cient to render the coated surfboard foul tasting when bitten AOIN 25/24 (2006.01) by a shark but insufficient to reliably repel a shark in response AOIN 25/26 (2006.01) to the dispersion in the water of the repellent. -
Article Lagabrielle Et Al. (2018)
www.nature.com/scientificreports/ Facteurs environnementaux et anthropiques affectant la fréquence croissante des interactions requin- humain autour d'une île de l'océan Indien en développement rapide (Version traduite de l’anglais au français) Reçu: 24 Mai 2017 Accepté: 2 Février 2018 Publié en ligne : 27 février 2018 https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-018-21553-0 Note : Cette version traduite en français apporte des corrections mineures à la version en ligne. Erwann Lagabrielle1,2, Agathe Allibert3,4, Jeremy J. Kiszka5, Nicolas Loiseau6, P. Kilfoil5 & Anne Lemahieu1,7 La compréhension des facteurs environnementaux des interactions entre les prédateurs et les humains est essentielle à la sécurité publique et à la gestion. Dans le milieu marin, cet enjeu de compréhension concerne les interactions requin-humain. Le taux annuel d'incidence des morsures de requins (shark bite incidence rate SBIR) à La Réunion (Océan Indien) est parmi les plus élevés au monde (jusqu'à 1 événement par 24 000 heures de surf) et a été multiplié par 23 sur la période 2005-2016. Depuis 1988, 86% des morsures de requins sur des surfeurs ont eu lieu sur la côte sous le vent, où 96% de l’activité de surf se concentre sur période. Nous avons modélisé la probabilité de morsure de requin en fonction de variables environnementales, y compris le substrat benthique, la température de la mer et la période de la journée. Cette probabilité a culminé en hiver, au cours de l'après-midi et a considérablement augmenté sur le substrat corallien depuis le milieu des années 2000. Les schémas saisonniers d'augmentation de la probabilité de morsure ont suivi des fluctuations similaires à celles de l’abondance de requins côtiers (en particulier le requin-bouledogue Carcharhinus leucas), ce qui correspond à l'hypothèse qu'une présence accrue des requins pourrait augmenter la probabilité de morsures de requins. -
Shark Mitigation and Deterrent Measures
The Senate Environment and Communications References Committee Shark mitigation and deterrent measures December 2017 © Commonwealth of Australia 2017 ISBN 978-1-76010-681-2 Committee contact details PO Box 6100 Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 Tel: 02 6277 3526 Fax: 02 6277 5818 Email: [email protected] Internet: www.aph.gov.au/senate_ec This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Australia License. The details of this licence are available on the Creative Commons website: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/au/. This document was printed by the Senate Printing Unit, Parliament House, Canberra Committee membership Committee members Senator Peter Whish-Wilson, Chair from 7 February 2017 AG, Tasmania to 4 September 2017 and from 14 September 2017 Senator Jonathon Duniam, Deputy Chair from LP, Tasmania 7 September 2017 Senator Linda Reynolds CSC, Deputy Chair from LP, Western Australia 16 February 2017 to 7 September 2017 Senator Anthony Chisholm ALP, Queensland Senator Sam Dastyari ALP, New South Wales Senator Anne Urquhart ALP, Tasmania Former members Senator Janet Rice from 4 to 7 September 2017 AG, Victoria Senator Larissa Waters, Chair to 7 February 2017 AG, Queensland Senator David Bushby, Deputy Chair to LP, Tasmania 5 December 2016 Senator James Paterson, Deputy Chair from LP, Victoria 5 December 2016 to 15 February 2017 Participating members for this inquiry Senator Sue Lines ALP, Western Australia Senator the Hon Ian Macdonald LP, Queensland Senator Lee Rhiannon AG, New South Wales Senator Rachel Siewert AG, Tasmania Senator John Williams NATS, New South Wales Committee secretariat Ms Christine McDonald, Committee Secretary Mr Colby Hannan, Principal Research Officer Ms Fattimah Imtoual, Senior Research Officer Mr Michael Perks, Research Officer Ms Georgia Fletcher, Administration Officer Ms Michelle Macarthur-King, Administration Officer iii Table of contents Committee membership .................................................................................. -
A Correlation Study of the Potential Risk Factors Associated with White Shark Attacks in Western Australian Waters November 2012
Fisheries Occasional Publication No. 109, 2012 A correlation study of the potential risk factors associated with white shark attacks in Western Australian waters November 2012 Fisheries Research Division Western Australian Fisheries and Marine Research Laboratories PO Box 20 NORTH BEACH, Western Australia 6920 Department of Fisheries 3rd floor SGIO Atrium 168-170 St George’s Terrace PERTH WA 6000 Telephone: (08) 9482 7333 Facsimile: (08) 9482 7389 Website: www.fish.wa.gov.au ABN: 55 689 794 771 Published by Department of Fisheries, Perth, Western Australia. Fisheries Occasional Publication No. 109, November 2012. ISSN: 1447 - 2058 ISBN: 978-1-921845-50-5 ii Fisheries Occasional Publication No. 98, 2012 Contents Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ 1 White Shark attacks have increased. ................................................................................................... 1 Summary of Outcomes. ...................................................................................................................... 1 Most White Shark attacks occur offshore. .......................................................................................... 1 White Shark attacks aren’t site specific. ............................................................................................. 1 White Sharks prefer cooler water. ....................................................................................................... 2