DOCSLIB.ORG

Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach Activity Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach Activity Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach Activity Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach Activity Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach Nathalie A. Cabrol Director, Carl Sagan Center, Pamela Harman, Acting Director, Center for Education Rebecca McDonald Director, Center for Outreach Bill Diamond President & CEO The SETI Institute: 189 N Bernardo Avenue Suite 200, Mountain View, CA 94043. Phone: (650) 961-6633 Activity Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach TABLE OF CONTENTS Peer-reviewed publications 10 Conferences: Abstracts & Proceedings 18 Technical Reports & Data Releases 29 Outreach, Media Coverage, Web Stories & Interviews 31 Invited Talks (Professional & Public) 39 Highlights, Significant Events & Activities 46 Fieldwork 52 Honors & Awards 54 Missions, Observations & Strategic Planning 56 Acknowledgements 60 The SETI Institute: 189 N Bernardo Avenue Suite 200, Mountain View, CA 94043. Phone: (650) 961-6633 Activity Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach FROM THE SETI INSTITUTE President and CEO Dear friends, The scientists, educators and outreach professionals of the SETI Institute had yet another banner year of productivity in 2017. We are delighted to present our 2nd annual report, cataloging the research and education programs of the Institute, as well as the myriad of mainstream media stories about our people and our work. Among the highlights from this year’s report are 147 peer-reviewed articles in scientific journals, 225 conference proceedings and abstracts, 172 media stories and interviews, and 177 invited talks. The report also highlights 16 of our researchers and educators who were honored with more than twenty different committee chair positions, fellowships and NASA achievement awards for their extraordinary work. Honors and recognitions included: • Edna DeVore was selected as a fellow of the American Association for the Advance- ment of Science • Doug Caldwell was cited among the “World’s Most Impactful Researchers” by Clari- vate Analytics • Fergal Mullally received the NASA 2017 Exceptional Public Achievement Medal for revolutionary Kepler Object of Interest Vetting. • Mark Showalter received a NASA Group Achievement Award, granted to the New Horizons team • Margaret Race was appointed Senior Scientific Editor of the Astrobiology Journal • Driss Takir received a NASA Silver Achievement Medal for contributions to the char- acterization of asteroid Bennu with the OSIRIS-Rex team In addition, The SETI Institute was recognized as a “Top 100 NASA Contractor” for 2016 and we received the Alliance Award from the Girl Scouts of Northern California in The SETI Institute: 189 N Bernardo Avenue Suite 200, Mountain View, CA 94043. Phone: (650) 961-6633 Activity Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach recognition of outstanding support. Lastly, Mark Showalter, Edna DeVore and Seth Shostak were named as the first Fellows of the Institute. We’ve added new sections to this year’s report highlighting our contributions to planned and ongoing NASA missions, submission of mission planning concepts, participation on official committees and working groups, and time allocations on major observational platforms, including Arecibo, Greenbank, the Very Large Array (VLA), the Spitzer Space Telescope, SOFIA, Hubble and more. Sharing our work with the public is a core element of our mission as a world-class research institution. I encourage you to peruse the following pages and get better acquainted with our amazing team and the compelling and impactful work they do. Sincerely, Bill Diamond President and CEO February 20, 2018 The SETI Institute: 189 N Bernardo Avenue Suite 200, Mountain View, CA 94043. Phone: (650) 961-6633 Activity Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach CARL SAGAN CENTER for the study of life in the universe Taking Flight! This year was a very successful year for the Carl Sagan Center (CSC), and this impres- sive report is a reflection of your commitment to excellence: We are publishing in high profile journals; we are recognized leaders in our fields, and our work is being acknowl- edged regularly by our peers through prestigious honors and awards. We also share our passion of exploration and discovery with the public, and I am always amazed to see how the number of our public lectures often times surpass our professional presentations. That speaks volume about dedication. You are the best advocates of the Institute, and in a world where education is facing so many challenges, you are the voice of science and the keepers of the flame for the next generation. This year also marked Cassini’s Grand Finale. Many of you were involved with this prestigious mission, For all of us, the day Cassini plunged into Saturn’s atmosphere was bittersweet. However, as one mission ends, new ones are being readied (e.g., JWST, TESS, Mars 2020, ExoMars, and others), and the SETI Institute is already present at various levels in these missions, and will be directly involved with these exciting new chapters of exploration. When it comes to the inner workings of the CSC, this year brought a real improvement in our proposal success rate. During the retreat at Asilomar, I shared with you my con- cerns about the 2016 numbers, and together, we took a hard look at what could be im- proved. The Science Council took charge and went through a deep review and some soul searching to understand how to be more successful. As a result, there is now a process to help you with grant writing and proposal submission, and we will make sure to provide you all the support we can to keep the momentum going. Meanwhile, you took charge too. I was delighted to see how you started to communicate with each other, review each other’s proposals whenever possible, asked for advice and for collaboration, and sometimes for instruments as well, within the SETI Institute The SETI Institute: 189 N Bernardo Avenue Suite 200, Mountain View, CA 94043. Phone: (650) 961-6633 Activity Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach community. This is really what it is all about: team work. Yes, we do sometimes compete against each other for the same grant money, and will continue to do so; but we are also learning to work together whenever possible, and in doing so, we are becoming stronger. The success of one is the success of all, and this is starting to pay dividend, literally. Since the retreat, we have received now over two third of the results for the 2017 proposal season. At this point in time, our success rate is above national average by a good margin. It is an average over all programs, and success is program-depen- dent. There are still areas that will require serious work but, overall, 2017 is turning out to be a very successful year, and you should be extremely proud of this. Your engagement in the process is key to this success. It will be even more important in the coming months, as we are de- fining the strategic vision for the years to come, creating new opportunities for us all through new collaborations, and new ways of doing business. Your engagement with your Research Group Chairs and the Science Council will be key. Remem- ber, this is your Institute, and by being involved, you are making your voice heard, and help shape your own future. While I am here to steer and suggest, I am also – and more importantly – here to listen and help, and to implement your ideas to the best of my abilities. As I always say: My door is always open, and I am also only one email away. Indeed, there is a lot to be proud of this year, and we will celebrate all these successes together. While there is always prog- ress to be made, I certainly can say that this year saw us all starting to think as a unit, and working more with, and for, each other. Embarking on that path was critical, and you are making it happen. I would like to end this letter by thanking all of those who are working behind the scene to make it all happen every single day in all departments of the Institute. Thank you! Nathalie A. Cabrol Director, SETI Institute Carl Sagan Center January 19, 2018 The SETI Institute: 189 N Bernardo Avenue Suite 200, Mountain View, CA 94043. Phone: (650) 961-6633 Activity Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach CENTER FOR EDUCATION The 2017 Activity Report, a copious compendium of events and publications, is just the tip of the iceberg of the undertakings and efforts of the SETI Institute in the name of education and public engagement. Our day to day efforts, and incremental milestones are a significant part of our 2017 report. The Center for Education pillar programs, NASA Airborne Astronomy Ambassadors (AAA) and Reaching for the Stars: NASA Science for Girl Scouts progressed through the kick-off, professional development, flight week experiences, and evaluation of the Cycle 6 AAA; and rounds of testing and revising Girl Scout Space Science Badges, as well as holding astronomy camps. Unique in 2017, Girl Scout Destination Camps on the path of eclipse totality, and Girl Scout Eclipse Boxes & Activity Guides were successful due to great collaboration with our Co-Investigators. We were fortunate to have the REU and FDL programs on site, and look forward to the energy those programs bring to us. I offer my sincere gratitude to my Institute colleagues that embraced communication and collaboration across centers, that mentor students and life-long learners, that give public talks and that visit classrooms and libraries. Pamela Harman Acting Director, SETI Institute Center for Education The SETI Institute: 189 N Bernardo Avenue Suite 200, Mountain View, CA 94043. Phone: (650) 961-6633 Activity Report 2017 Research, Education and Public Outreach CENTER FOR OUTREACH 2017 was an amazing year in so many ways. At the SETI Institute, our more than 75 sci- entists and researchers have continued to advance the SETI Institute’s mission to explore, understand and explain the origin and nature of life in the universe, and the evolution of intelligence.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants As Tracers of Planet Formation
    Lurking in the Shadows: Wide-Separation Gas Giants as Tracers of Planet Formation Thesis by Marta Levesque Bryan In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2018 Defended May 1, 2018 ii © 2018 Marta Levesque Bryan ORCID: [0000-0002-6076-5967] All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank Heather Knutson, who I had the great privilege of working with as my thesis advisor. Her encouragement, guidance, and perspective helped me navigate many a challenging problem, and my conversations with her were a consistent source of positivity and learning throughout my time at Caltech. I leave graduate school a better scientist and person for having her as a role model. Heather fostered a wonderfully positive and supportive environment for her students, giving us the space to explore and grow - I could not have asked for a better advisor or research experience. I would also like to thank Konstantin Batygin for enthusiastic and illuminating discussions that always left me more excited to explore the result at hand. Thank you as well to Dimitri Mawet for providing both expertise and contagious optimism for some of my latest direct imaging endeavors. Thank you to the rest of my thesis committee, namely Geoff Blake, Evan Kirby, and Chuck Steidel for their support, helpful conversations, and insightful questions. I am grateful to have had the opportunity to collaborate with Brendan Bowler. His talk at Caltech my second year of graduate school introduced me to an unexpected population of massive wide-separation planetary-mass companions, and lead to a long-running collaboration from which several of my thesis projects were born.
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture-29 (PDF)
    Life in the Universe Orin Harris and Greg Anderson Department of Physics & Astronomy Northeastern Illinois University Spring 2021 c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 1 / 95 Overview Dating Rocks Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 2 / 95 Dating Rocks Zircon Dating Sedimentary Grand Canyon Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Dating Rocks Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 3 / 95 Zircon Dating Zircon, (ZrSiO4), minerals incorporate trace amounts of uranium but reject lead. Naturally occuring uranium: • U-238: 99.27% • U-235: 0.72% Decay chains: • 238U −→ 206Pb, τ =4.47 Gyrs. • 235U −→ 207Pb, τ = 704 Myrs. 1956, Clair Camron Patterson dated the Canyon Diablo meteorite: τ =4.55 Gyrs. c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 4 / 95 Dating Sedimentary Rocks • Relative ages: Deeper layers were deposited earlier • Absolute ages: Decay of radioactive isotopes old (deposited last) oldest (depositedolder first) c 2012-2021 G. Anderson., O. Harris Universe: Past, Present & Future – slide 5 / 95 Grand Canyon: Earth History from 200 million - 2 billion yrs ago. Dating Rocks Life on Earth Earth History Timeline Late Heavy Bombardment Hadean Shark Bay Stromatolites Cyanobacteria Q: Earliest Fossils? Life on Earth O2 History Q: Life on Earth How Did Life Arise? Life in the Solar System Life Around Other Stars Interstellar Travel SETI Review c 2012-2021 G.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nearest Stars: a Guided Tour by Sherwood Harrington, Astronomical Society of the Pacific
    www.astrosociety.org/uitc No. 5 - Spring 1986 © 1986, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 390 Ashton Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94112. The Nearest Stars: A Guided Tour by Sherwood Harrington, Astronomical Society of the Pacific A tour through our stellar neighborhood As evening twilight fades during April and early May, a brilliant, blue-white star can be seen low in the sky toward the southwest. That star is called Sirius, and it is the brightest star in Earth's nighttime sky. Sirius looks so bright in part because it is a relatively powerful light producer; if our Sun were suddenly replaced by Sirius, our daylight on Earth would be more than 20 times as bright as it is now! But the other reason Sirius is so brilliant in our nighttime sky is that it is so close; Sirius is the nearest neighbor star to the Sun that can be seen with the unaided eye from the Northern Hemisphere. "Close'' in the interstellar realm, though, is a very relative term. If you were to model the Sun as a basketball, then our planet Earth would be about the size of an apple seed 30 yards away from it — and even the nearest other star (alpha Centauri, visible from the Southern Hemisphere) would be 6,000 miles away. Distances among the stars are so large that it is helpful to express them using the light-year — the distance light travels in one year — as a measuring unit. In this way of expressing distances, alpha Centauri is about four light-years away, and Sirius is about eight and a half light- years distant.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1909.05961V1 [Astro-Ph.SR] 12 Sep 2019
    Draft version September 16, 2019 Typeset using LATEX twocolumn style in AASTeX62 TESS ASTEROSEISMOLOGY OF THE KNOWN RED-GIANT HOST STARS HD 212771 AND HD 203949 Tiago L. Campante,1, 2, 3 Enrico Corsaro,4 Mikkel N. Lund,5, 3 Beno^ıt Mosser,6 Aldo Serenelli,7, 8, 3 Dimitri Veras,9, 10, 3, ∗ Vardan Adibekyan,1 H. M. Antia,11 Warrick Ball,12, 5 Sarbani Basu,13 Timothy R. Bedding,14, 5, 3 Diego Bossini,1 Guy R. Davies,12, 5 Elisa Delgado Mena,1 Rafael A. Garc´ıa,15, 16 Rasmus Handberg,5 Marc Hon,17 Stephen R. Kane,18 Steven D. Kawaler,19, 3 James S. Kuszlewicz,20, 5 Miles Lucas,19 Savita Mathur,21, 22 Nicolas Nardetto,23 Martin B. Nielsen,12, 5, 24 Marc H. Pinsonneault,25, 3 Sabine Reffert,26 V´ıctor Silva Aguirre,5 Keivan G. Stassun,27, 28 Dennis Stello,17, 14, 5, 3 Stephan Stock,26 Mathieu Vrard,1 Mutlu Yıldız,29 William J. Chaplin,12, 5, 3 Daniel Huber,30, 3 Jacob L. Bean,31 Zeynep C¸elik Orhan,29 Margarida S. Cunha,1, 2 Jørgen Christensen-Dalsgaard,5, 3 Hans Kjeldsen,5, 32 Travis S. Metcalfe,33, 20 Andrea Miglio,12, 5 Mario´ J. P. F. G. Monteiro,1, 2 Benard Nsamba,1 Sibel Ortel¨ ,29 Filipe Pereira,1 Sergio´ G. Sousa,1, 2 Maria Tsantaki,1 and Margaret C. Turnbull34 1Instituto de Astrof´ısica e Ci^enciasdo Espa¸co,Universidade do Porto, Rua das Estrelas, 4150-762 Porto, Portugal 2Departamento de F´ısica e Astronomia, Faculdade de Ci^enciasda Universidade do Porto, Rua do Campo Alegre, s/n, 4169-007 Porto, Portugal 3Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4030, USA 4INAF | Osservatorio Astrofisico di Catania, via S.
    [Show full text]
  • Refereed Publications That Name
    59 Refereed Publications Since 2011 with Named Co-Authors who are NASA Citizen Scientists Compiled by Marc Kuchner February 2021 Authors in bold are citizen scientists. Aurorasaurus Semeter, J., Hunnekuhl, M., MacDonald, E., Hirsch, M., Zeller, N., Chernenkoff, A., & Wang, J. (2020). The mysterious green streaks below STEVE. AGU Advances, 1, e2020AV000183. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020AV000183 Hunnekuhl, M., & MacDonald, E. (2020). Early ground‐based work by auroral pioneer Carl Størmer on the high‐altitude detached subauroral arcs now known as “STEVE”. Space Weather, 18, e2019SW002384. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002384 S. B. Mende. B. J. Harding, & C. Turner. “Subauroral Green STEVE Arcs: Evidence for Low- Energy Excitation” Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 46, Issue 24, Pages 14256-14262 (2019) http://doi.org/10.1029/2019GL086145 S. B. Mende. & C. Turner. “Color Ratios of Subauroral (STEVE) Arcs” Journal of Geophysical Research (Space Physics),Volume 124, Issue 7, Pages 5945-5955 (2019) http://doi.org/10.1029/2019JA026851 Y. Nishimura, Y., B, Gallardo-Lacourt, B., Y, Zou, E. Mishin, D.J. Knudsen, E. F. Donovan, V. Angelopoulos, R. Raybell, “Magnetospheric Signatures of STEVE: Implications for the Magnetospheric Energy Source and Interhemispheric Conjugacy” Geophysical Research Letters, Volume 46, Issue 11, Pages 5637-5644 (2019) Elizabeth A. MacDonald, Eric Donovan, Yukitoshi Nishimura, Nathan A. Case, D. Megan Gillies, Bea Gallardo-Lacourt, William E. Archer, Emma L. Spanswick, Notanee Bourassa, Martin Connors, Matthew Heavner, Brian Jackel, Burcu Kosar, David J. Knudsen, Chris Ratzlaff and Ian Schofield, “New science in plain sight: Citizen scientists lead to the discovery of optical structure in the upper atmosphere” Science Advances, vol.
    [Show full text]
  • UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT of INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION in Re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMEN
    USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 1 of 354 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA SOUTH BEND DIVISION ) Case No. 3:05-MD-527 RLM In re FEDEX GROUND PACKAGE ) (MDL 1700) SYSTEM, INC., EMPLOYMENT ) PRACTICES LITIGATION ) ) ) THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: ) ) Carlene Craig, et. al. v. FedEx Case No. 3:05-cv-530 RLM ) Ground Package Systems, Inc., ) ) PROPOSED FINAL APPROVAL ORDER This matter came before the Court for hearing on March 11, 2019, to consider final approval of the proposed ERISA Class Action Settlement reached by and between Plaintiffs Leo Rittenhouse, Jeff Bramlage, Lawrence Liable, Kent Whistler, Mike Moore, Keith Berry, Matthew Cook, Heidi Law, Sylvia O’Brien, Neal Bergkamp, and Dominic Lupo1 (collectively, “the Named Plaintiffs”), on behalf of themselves and the Certified Class, and Defendant FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FXG”) (collectively, “the Parties”), the terms of which Settlement are set forth in the Class Action Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) attached as Exhibit A to the Joint Declaration of Co-Lead Counsel in support of Preliminary Approval of the Kansas Class Action 1 Carlene Craig withdrew as a Named Plaintiff on November 29, 2006. See MDL Doc. No. 409. Named Plaintiffs Ronald Perry and Alan Pacheco are not movants for final approval and filed an objection [MDL Doc. Nos. 3251/3261]. USDC IN/ND case 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG document 3279 filed 03/22/19 page 2 of 354 Settlement [MDL Doc. No. 3154-1]. Also before the Court is ERISA Plaintiffs’ Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees and for Payment of Service Awards to the Named Plaintiffs, filed with the Court on October 19, 2018 [MDL Doc.
    [Show full text]
  • The Search for Another Earth – Part II
    GENERAL ARTICLE The Search for Another Earth – Part II Sujan Sengupta In the first part, we discussed the various methods for the detection of planets outside the solar system known as the exoplanets. In this part, we will describe various kinds of exoplanets. The habitable planets discovered so far and the present status of our search for a habitable planet similar to the Earth will also be discussed. Sujan Sengupta is an 1. Introduction astrophysicist at Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Bengaluru. He works on the The first confirmed exoplanet around a solar type of star, 51 Pe- detection, characterisation 1 gasi b was discovered in 1995 using the radial velocity method. and habitability of extra-solar Subsequently, a large number of exoplanets were discovered by planets and extra-solar this method, and a few were discovered using transit and gravi- moons. tational lensing methods. Ground-based telescopes were used for these discoveries and the search region was confined to about 300 light-years from the Earth. On December 27, 2006, the European Space Agency launched 1The movement of the star a space telescope called CoRoT (Convection, Rotation and plan- towards the observer due to etary Transits) and on March 6, 2009, NASA launched another the gravitational effect of the space telescope called Kepler2 to hunt for exoplanets. Conse- planet. See Sujan Sengupta, The Search for Another Earth, quently, the search extended to about 3000 light-years. Both Resonance, Vol.21, No.7, these telescopes used the transit method in order to detect exo- pp.641–652, 2016. planets. Although Kepler’s field of view was only 105 square de- grees along the Cygnus arm of the Milky Way Galaxy, it detected a whooping 2326 exoplanets out of a total 3493 discovered till 2Kepler Telescope has a pri- date.
    [Show full text]
  • A Direct Communication Proposal to Test the Zoo Hypothesis
    Space Policy 38 (2016) 22e26 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Space Policy journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/spacepol Viewpoint A direct communication proposal to test the Zoo Hypothesis Joao~ Pedro de Magalhaes~ Institute of Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Biosciences Building, Room 245, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB, UK article info abstract Article history: Whether we are alone in the universe is one of the greatest mysteries facing humankind. Given the >100 Received 3 March 2016 billion stars in our galaxy, many have argued that it is statistically unlikely that life, including intelligent Accepted 16 June 2016 life, has not emerged anywhere else. The lack of any sign of extraterrestrial intelligence, even though on a Available online 26 July 2016 cosmic timescale extraterrestrial civilizations would have enough time to cross the galaxy, is known as Fermi's Paradox. One possible explanation for Fermi's Paradox is the Zoo Hypothesis which states that Keywords: one or more extraterrestrial civilizations know of our existence and can reach us, but have chosen not to Active SETI disturb us or even make their existence known to us. I propose here a proactive test of the Zoo Hy- Astrobiology fi Fermi's Paradox pothesis. Speci cally, I propose to send a message using television and radio channels to any extrater- Messaging to extraterrestrial intelligence restrial civilization(s) that might be listening and inviting them to respond. Even though I accept this is METI unlikely to be successful in the sense of resulting in a response from extraterrestrial intelligences, the possibility that extraterrestrial civilizations are monitoring us cannot be dismissed and my proposal is consistent with current scientific knowledge.
    [Show full text]
  • Planet Hunters, Zooniverse Evaluation Report
    Planet Hunters | Evaluation Report 2019 Planet Hunters, Zooniverse Evaluation report Authored by Dr Annaleise Depper Evaluation Officer, Public Engagement with Research Research Services, University of Oxford 1 Planet Hunters | Evaluation Report 2019 Contents 1. Key findings and highlights ..................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction ............................................................................................................ 4 3. Evaluating Planet Hunters ....................................................................................... 5 4. Exploring impacts and outcomes on citizen scientists ............................................. 6 4.1 Increased knowledge and understanding of Astronomy ..................................................................... 7 4.2 An enjoyable and interesting experience ......................................................................................... 12 4.3 Raised aspirations and interests in Astronomy ................................................................................ 13 4.4 Feeling of pride and satisfaction in helping the scientific community ............................................... 17 4.5 Benefits to individual wellbeing ...................................................................................................... 19 5. Learning from the evaluation ................................................................................ 20 5.1 Motivations for taking part in Planet Hunters
    [Show full text]
  • Variable Star Section Circular No
    The British Astronomical Association Variable Star Section Circular No. 176 June 2018 Office: Burlington House, Piccadilly, London W1J 0DU Contents Joint BAA-AAVSO meeting 3 From the Director 4 V392 Per (Nova Per 2018) - Gary Poyner & Robin Leadbeater 7 High-Cadence measurements of the symbiotic star V648 Car using a CMOS camera - Steve Fleming, Terry Moon and David Hoxley 9 Analysis of two semi-regular variables in Draco – Shaun Albrighton 13 V720 Cas and its close companions – David Boyd 16 Introduction to AstroImageJ photometry software – Richard Lee 20 Project Melvyn, May 2018 update – Alex Pratt 25 Eclipsing Binary news – Des Loughney 27 Summer Eclipsing Binaries – Christopher Lloyd 29 68u Herculis – David Conner 36 The BAAVSS Eclipsing Binary Programme lists – Christopher Lloyd 39 Section Publications 42 Contributing to the VSSC 42 Section Officers 43 Cover image V392 Per (Nova Per 2018) May 6.129UT iTelescope T11 120s. Martin Mobberley 2 Back to contents Joint BAA/AAVSO Meeting on Variable Stars Warwick University Saturday 7th & Sunday 8th July 2018 Following the last very successful joint meeting between the BAAVSS and the AAVSO at Cambridge in 2008, we are holding another joint meeting at Warwick University in the UK on 7-8 July 2018. This two-day meeting will include talks by Prof Giovanna Tinetti (University College London) Chemical composition of planets in our Galaxy Prof Boris Gaensicke (University of Warwick) Gaia: Transforming Stellar Astronomy Prof Tom Marsh (University of Warwick) AR Scorpii: a remarkable highly variable
    [Show full text]
  • EPSC2017-260, 2017 European Planetary Science Congress 2017 Eeuropeapn Planetarsy Science Ccongress C Author(S) 2017
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 11, EPSC2017-260, 2017 European Planetary Science Congress 2017 EEuropeaPn PlanetarSy Science CCongress c Author(s) 2017 Formation of recurring slope lineae on Mars by rarefied gas-triggered granular flows F. Schmidt (1), F. Andrieu (1), F. Costard (1), M. Kocifaj (2,3) and A. G. Meresescu (1) (1) GEOPS, Univ. Paris-Sud, CNRS, Université Paris-Saclay, Rue du Belvédère, Bât. 504-509, 91405 Orsay, France (2) ICA, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska Road 9, 845 03 Bratislava, Slovak Republic (3) Faculty of Mathematics, Physics, and Informatics, Comenius University, Mlynska dolina, 842 48 Bratislava, Slovak Republic (frederic.schmidt@@u-psud.fr) Abstract been excluded near the crater rim [3]. In addition, the actual amount of atmospheric water required to re- Recurring Slope Linae or RSL are seasonal dark charge the RSL's source each year seems not features appearing when the soil reaches its sufficient. The precise thermal calculations using maximum temperature. They appear on various THEMIS measurement instrument show no evidence slopes at the equator of Mars, in orientation of liquid water [6] and there is no direct evidence of depending on the season. Today, liquid water related liquid water from CRISM, but only indirect detection processes have been promoted, such as deliquescence [4]. of salts. Nevertheless external atmospheric source of water is inconsistent with the observations. Internal We propose here a re-interpretation of the RSL source is also very unlikely. We take into features and a new process to explain the RSL consideration here the force occurring when the sun activity without involving any volatiles.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunnyvale Heritage Resources
    CARIBBEAN DR 3RD AV G ST C ST BORDEAUX DR H ST 3RD AV Heritage Trees CARIBBEAN DR CASPIAN CT GENEVA DR ENTERPRISE WY 4TH AV Local Landmarks E ST CASPIAN DR BALTIC WY Heritage Resources 5TH AV JAVA DR 5TH AV MOFFETT PARK DR CROSSMAN AV 300-ft Buffer CHESAPEAKE TR GIBRALTAR CT GIBRALTAR DR ORLEANS DR MOFFETT PARK DR 7TH AV MACON RD ANVILWOOD City Boundary ENTERPRISEWY CT G ST C ST MOFFETT PARK CT 8TH AV HUMBOLDT CT PERSIAN DR FORGEWOODAV SR-237 ANVILWOODAV INNSBRUCK DR ELKO DR 9TH AV E ST FAIR OAKS WY BORREGAS AV D ST P O R P O I S ALDERWOODAV 11TH AV MOFFETT PARK DR E BA Y TR PARIA BIRCHWOODDR MATHILDA AV GLIESSEN JAEGALS RD GLIN SR-237 PLAZA DR PLENTYGLIN LA ROCHELLE TR TASMAN DR ENTERPRISE WY ENTERPRISE MONTEGO VIENNA DR KASSEL INNOVATION WAY BRADFORD DR MOLUCCA MONTEREY LEYTE MORSE AV KIHOLO LEMANS ROSS DR MUNICH LUND TASMAN CT KARLSTAD DR ESSEX AV COLTON AV FULTON AV DUNCAN AV HAMLIN CT SAGINAW FAIR OAKS AV TOYAMA DR SACO LAWRENCEEXPRESSWAY GARNER DR LYON US-101 SALERNO SAN JORGEKOSTANZ TIMOR KIEL CT SIRTE SOLOMON SUEZ LAKEBIRD DR CT DRIFTWOOD DRIFTWOOD CT CHARMWOOD CHARMWOOD CT SKYLAKE VALELAKE CT CT CLYDE AV BREEZEWOOD CT LAKECHIME DR JENNA PECOS WY AHWANEE AV LAKEDALE WY WEDDELL LOTUSLAKE CT GREENLAKE DR HIDDENLAKE DR WEDDELL DR MEADOWLAKE DR ALMANOR AV FAIRWOODAV STONYLAKE SR-237 LAKEFAIR DR CT CT LYRELAKE LYRELAKE HEM BLAZINGWOOD DR REDROCK CT LO CT CK ALTURAS AV SILVERLAKEDR AV CT CANDLEWOOD LAKEHAVEN DR BURNTWOOD CT C B LAKEHAVEN A TR U JADELAKE SAN ALESO AV R N MADRONE AV LAKEKNOLL DR N D T L PALOMAR AV SANTA CHRISTINA W CT
    [Show full text]