James Blue Oregon Filmmaker Rhapsody in Blue Papers, Films, and Tapes of Award-Winning Director

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

James Blue Oregon Filmmaker Rhapsody in Blue Papers, Films, and Tapes of Award-Winning Director FALL BUILDING KNOWLEDGE 2015 The Life and Legacy of James Blue Oregon Filmmaker Rhapsody in Blue Papers, films, and tapes of award-winning director James Blue ’53 gifted to UO Libraries By Jason Stone MAY, 1952. Theater marquees are touting the silent, black-and-white, 8mm film that had been Eugene, Oregon engagement of MGM’s latest shot over several weekends at impromptu locations Technicolor, swords-and-sandals epic. Quo Vadis— around the University of Oregon campus. The shot on location in Rome with a cast of Hollywood filmmakers all were undergraduates. Props: stars, 30,000 extras, 32,000 costumes, ten hand- popcorn, dry ice, a smoked mackerel, and a tube of carved chariots, a whole pride of lions, and a toothpaste. Cast members: four. Total budget: $40. then-astronomical budget of $7.6 million—is In an era when “student films” were still mostly already a box office hit nationwide. Released the unheard of, this production—a parody of Laurence previous November, it garnered eight Academy Olivier’s Hamlet—attracted much curiosity. An Award nominations and ranked as the highest- audience of 2,000 crowded the UO Student Union grossing film of 1951. ballroom for the film’s debut. On hand was the But something unexpected happened when Quo project’s mastermind, producer-director-cameraman Vadis came to Eugene. In our neck of the woods, Jim Blue, a speech and theater major from Portland. the blockbuster that Life magazine touted “the most As the silent footage screened, he provided a colossal ever” would not become the cinematic musical soundtrack via record player and narrated event of the season. Improbably, it got upstaged by a through a microphone. 20 | UNIVERSITY OF OREGON LIBRARIES By all accounts, Blue’s comedic riff on The Bard Our Food Problem was a hit. “They laughed at Hamlet!” the national (1968)—the magazine Movie Makers reported. “Using a collection consists minimum of photographic equipment and a of the filmmaker’s maximum of ingenuity, a group of Eugene, Oregon personal papers, amateur filmers have gone a long way toward production proving that ‘Home Movies Are Better than Ever.’” materials, photographs, A decade later, the same young director would correspondence, make another auspicious premier. This time it was sound recordings, in the south of France. Filmed amidst the Algerian and more. This war for independence and featuring a cast of non- acquisition actors, James Blue’s hybrid “docu-drama” Les enables the UO Libraries to begin redressing the Oliviers de la Justice (“The Olive Trees of Justice”) veil of anonymity which has threatened to obscure was awarded the Critics’ Prize at the 1962 Festival the director’s work in the years after his death. de Cannes. Richard Herskowitz, chair of the UO’s James Blue In April 2015, the University of Oregon Libraries Research Interest Group, believes that a change in was pleased to announce that the personal papers, perception is imminent. “When they can finally see media, and collected production materials of UO his work, I think a lot of people are going to be alumnus James Blue ’53 have found a permanent asking themselves: How did we not know about home in our Special Collections and University this great American filmmaker?” Archives (SCUA). “The library regards it as a significant honor that we AT ONE TIME, NO DOUBT, almost everybody who have been selected to steward and provide access to cared about cinematic arts knew the name Blue. the material legacy of this important and award- While he lived, James Blue (1930-1980) was winning filmmaker,” said Dean of Libraries and internationally recognized not only as a Philip H. Knight Chair Adriene Lim. “Oregon groundbreaking documentarian, but also as an helped give James Blue his start, but his immense educator, actor, talent and groundbreaking work soon earned him film historian, international acclaim.” and advocate for experimentation The James Blue Papers are a gift of the Blue family. in the non- In addition to rare prints of Blue’s films—including fiction form. He the UO production of Hamlet and award-winning shot films in works like The March (1963) and A Few Notes on “Jim was always an outsider looking in,” the director’s brother, Richard Blue reflects. “Especially after our family moved from Oklahoma to Portland in 1942. From age 12 to about 16, he was unhappy, angry, rebellious. I think this alienation had a profound effect on his sensibility and empathy for people in other cultures, especially those who were isolated and powerless.” This connection was not lost on observers of his day. Paul Sharits—a pioneer of “structural films” in the 1970s—noted: “While most documentary films intend to convince us of their veracity/validity, Jim’s work has the sense of probing, searching, and questioning.” EVEN NOW, DECADES REMOVED from the cultural context in which they were created, Blue’s films retain this atmosphere of ardent yet broad-minded several languages, on five different continents. questing. Unfortunately, too few people in recent He received a Ford Foundation grant (1964), a times have had the opportunity to savor it. Despite Guggenheim Fellowship (1967), and an Academy all the awards and acclaim that Blue garnered Award Nomination for Best Documentary Feature during his lifetime, over the years his work has (1968). His filmThe March, capturing the August, become more and more difficult to find. 1963 Civil Rights march on Washington, D.C. that culminated with Martin Luther King, Jr.’s “I Have “The scarcity of some of this material cannot be a Dream” speech, was named to the National Film overstated,” explains UO Libraries Curator of Registry in 2008 and earmarked for permanent Moving Images Elizabeth Peterson. “For example, preservation by the National Archives in 2013— there aren’t any copies of The Olive Trees in any placing it among the most honored and culturally other American libraries, period, in any format. relevant motion pictures in our nation’s history. Knowing how few prints remain, I find myself holding the film cans of this work that won the Behind this highly accomplished work was a Critic’s Prize at the Cannes Film Festival. It’s a rare, complicated man. Listening to his friends and special feeling.” colleagues talk about Blue, it can be difficult to reconcile that their various impressions were all Richard Blue continues: “After she evaluated our inspired by the same individual. However, the print of Olive Trees, Elizabeth advised us that it people who knew him best insist that these would require considerable restoration work. The apparent contradictions are, in fact, the keys cost would run into five figures. Luckily, with the to unravelling his complex persona. generous support of director James Ivory [also a UO alumnus], the James Blue Alliance recently “James was an infuriating person: self-absorbed, located two additional prints in France. We’ve been loathe to accept criticism, autocratic,” recalls fortunate to get new copies printed from those. It Janice Blue, who was married to the director for involved the efforts of a large, international group of six tumultuous years in the 1970s. “He was also people, as befits the nature of my brother’s work.” one of the innocents of the world, with a breath- taking sweetness and guilelessness.” 22 | UNIVERSITY OF OREGON LIBRARIES Still from James Blue’s feature film Les Oliviers de la Justice (1962), winner of the Critics’ Prize at Cannes. Even beyond the rarity of copies, there’s a myriad became prominent filmmakers and lifelong friends. of reasons why Blue’s work is not better known Blue considered his education to be a deeply today. Some of his most acclaimed films were formative experience; one that he hoped to share produced for the United States Information Agency with others. In the course of his career, he taught (USIA)—intended for foreign audiences only, they and lectured at UCLA—where his students were therefore blocked from domestic distribution included Francis Ford Coppola and rocker by Congressional statute. Other works were Jim Morrison—Yale, Rice, SUNY-Buffalo, the controversial: in France, the award-winning Olive Museum of Modern Art in New York, and the Trees received critical barbs from both the political British Film Institute. Left and Right. Especially later in his career, Blue “[He inspired] film students to search constantly produced many of his films in noncommercial for the truths that underlie conventional wisdom,” contexts, using collaborative methods that could says ethnographic filmmaker David McDougall. complicate issues of “authorship.” Most of the “He also found this process immensely exciting— director’s work has never been released on DVD. an excitement that he communicated to those of Also, for all his accolades as a filmmaker, Blue was us around him, students and colleagues alike.” probably most renowned as a scholar and teacher. Though many of his peers lamented that Blue Blue had started graduate school at the UO, but was neglecting his own creative development left when he received a scholarship to continue his by concentrating so much on teaching others, studies at the prestigious Institut des hautes études through his pedagogy he would exert a profound cinématographiques (IDHEC) in Paris. Among the influence on an entire generation of media makers international cohort of students were several who and scholars. Turning to audio documentary, James Blue conducted extensive, in-depth interviews with leading figures of international cinema. His subjects included Alfred Hitchcock, Federico Fellini, Jean- Luc Godard, Milos Forman, Satyajit Ray, and Frank Capra. Blue wanted to create a dialogue among peers; an open and critical discussion of the creative process, cinematic theory and style. recounts Gordon Hitchens, founder and publisher of the influential magazine Film Comment, where several of the interviews first appeared.
Recommended publications
  • The Human Voice and the Silent Cinema. PUB DATE Apr 75 NOTE 23P.; Paper Presented at the Society Tor Cinema Studies Conference (New York City, April 1975)
    i t i DOCUMENT RESUME ED 105 527 CS 501 036 AUTHOR Berg, Charles M. TITLE The Human Voice and the Silent Cinema. PUB DATE Apr 75 NOTE 23p.; Paper presented at the Society tor Cinema Studies Conference (New York City, April 1975) EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$1.58 PLUS POSTAGE DESCRIPTORS *Audiovisual Communication; Communication (Thought Transfer); *Films; *Film Study; Higher Education; *History; *Sound Films; Visual Literacy ABSTRACT This paper traces the history of motion pictures from Thomas Edison's vision in 1887 of an instrument that recorded body movements to the development cf synchronized sound-motion films in the late 1920s. The first synchronized sound film was made and demonstrated by W. K. L. Dickson, an assistant to Edison, in 1889. The popular acceptance of silent films and their contents is traced. through the development of film narrative and the use of music in the early 1900s. The silent era is labeled as a consequence of technological and economic chance and this chance is made to account for the accelerated development of the medium's visual communicative capacities. The thirty year time lapse between the development of film and the -e of live human voices can therefore be regarded as the critical stimuli which pushed the motion picture into becoming an essentially visual medium in which the audial channel is subordinate to and supportive of the visual channel. The time lapse also aided the motion picture to become a medium of artistic potential and significance. (RB) U SOEPARTME NT OF HEALTH. COUCATION I. WELFARE e NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF 4 EOUCATION D, - 1'HA.
    [Show full text]
  • James Ivory in France
    James Ivory in France James Ivory is seated next to the large desk of the late Ismail Merchant in their Manhattan office overlooking 57th Street and the Hearst building. On the wall hangs a large poster of Merchant’s book Paris: Filming and Feasting in France. It is a reminder of the seven films Merchant-Ivory Productions made in France, a source of inspiration for over 50 years. ....................................................Greta Scacchi and Nick Nolte in Jefferson in Paris © Seth Rubin When did you go to Paris for the first time? Jhabvala was reading. I had always been interested in Paris in James Ivory: It was in 1950, and I was 22. I the 1920’s, and I liked the story very much. Not only was it my had taken the boat train from Victoria Station first French film, but it was also my first feature in which I in London, and then we went to Cherbourg, thought there was a true overall harmony and an artistic then on the train again. We arrived at Gare du balance within the film itself of the acting, writing, Nord. There were very tall, late 19th-century photography, décor, and music. apartment buildings which I remember to this day, lining the track, which say to every And it brought you an award? traveler: Here is Paris! JI: It was Isabelle Adjani’s first English role, and she received for this film –and the movie Possession– the Best Actress You were following some college classmates Award at the Cannes Film Festival the following year. traveling to France? JI: I did not want to be left behind.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Producers Book Finalists
    PRODUCERS BOOK & PRINT SOURCE LIST Pre-Festival Edition THE 2017 PRODUCERS BOOK A LETTER FROM THE SCREENPLAY & FILM COMPETITION DIRECTORS Hello! Each year, we prepare our annual Producers Book which contains loglines and contact information for the year’s top scripts in our various Script Competitions. Please feel free to reach out to any of the writers listed here to request a copy of their scripts. Also included is our Print Source List containing information for all films selected for the 2017 Festival. This year’s Semifinalists and Finalists were chosen from a field of 9,487 scripts entered in our Screenplay, Digital Series, Playwriting, and Fiction Podcast Competitions. Each year we are amazed by the professional quality and talent that we receive and this year wasn’t any different. The Competition is open to feature-length scripts in the genres of drama, comedy, sci-fi, and horror; teleplay pilots and specs, short scripts, stage plays, fiction podcast scripts, and digital series scripts. Year after year, our strive in programming the Austin Film Festival film slate is to discover and champion the writers and those who can translate amazing stories to the screen. We received over 5,000 film submissions this year and had the task of whittling it down to 182 films that embody our mission and passion for storytelling. It was a harrowing task, but it led to our strongest year of film yet. We’re so proud of this year’s diverse group of filmmakers and unique voices and can’t wait for these works to be seen, shared, and loved.
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance and Achievements of Luca Guadagnino's Call Me By
    To Speak or to Die: The Importance and Achievements of Luca Guadagnino’s Call Me by Your Name (2017) Treball de Fi de Grau/ BA dissertation Author: Alex Dalmau Barreal Supervisor: Dr. Sara Martín Alegre Departament de Filologia Anglesa i de Germanística Grau d‘Estudis Anglesos June 2020 CONTENTS 0. Introduction .................................................................................................................. 1 0.1 Luca Guadagnino‘s Life and Work ........................................................................ 1 0.2 Guadagnino‘s Call Me by Your Name .................................................................... 2 1. Adapting a Novel: A Work of Respect ......................................................................... 6 1.1 Differences and similarities .................................................................................... 6 1.2 Controversies while Adapting .............................................................................. 12 2. A Film with a Legacy ................................................................................................. 17 2.1 Importance within the LGBT community ............................................................ 17 2.2 Impact within the film industry ............................................................................ 21 3. Conclusions and further research ............................................................................... 27 Works Cited ...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Cinema: Reframed, Restored & Rediscovered, 26
    PRESS RELEASE: 20 JUNE 2018 | Cinema Rediscovered returns to Bristol for its 3rd edition, 26 - 29 July followed by UK wide tour; putting lesser known cinematic visions centre stage and asking questions about the role of cinema. CINEMA: REFRAMED, RESTORED & REDISCOVERED, 26 - 29 July Cinema Rediscovered Bristol is thrilled to announce two major focuses; Reframing the Archive (Thu 26 July) and Restored & Rediscovered including brand new restorations of Maurice (1987), The Apartment (1960) and Le Crime de Monsieur Lange (1936), Aardman’s earliest films Animated Conversations (1977) and Conversation Pieces (1983) plus a 20th anniversary launch preview of The Big Lebowski (1998) REFRAMING THE ARCHIVES Pictured: Jema Desai, Founder of I am Dora (left), Danny Leigh, Senior Curator of fiction film and television at BFI National Archive, writer/curator Karen Alexander, The Final Girls, Joan Parsons, Time is Now & Head of Queen’s Film Theatre (right) Some of the most distinctive voices in cinema curation open up a conversation on the importance of re-presenting and reframing archives, and in shifting our perspective on the past. Speaker guests include Jemma Desai (Founder of I am Dora), The Final Girls, Joan Parsons (Time is Now), Sally Griffith (Anim18), Charlotte Harman (Compass Presents) and writer/curator Karen Alexander. Co-presented with BFI Film Audience Network (FAN) partners including Film Hub North, now leading on major FAN wide screen heritage activity, this is the first in a series of initiatives aimed at inspiring and challenging the exhibition and archive sector to reframe film heritage in the context of BFI2022 priorities and beyond. Danny Leigh, writer, broadcaster and Senior Curator of fiction film and television at BFI National Archive, gives his perspective on reframing the past, present and future of the archive looking at the very recent history of film with a focus on his personal interest in class representation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013
    The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013 COUNCIL ON LIBRARY AND INFORMATION RESOURCES AND THE LIBRARY OF CONGRESS The Survival of American Silent Feature Films: 1912–1929 by David Pierce September 2013 Mr. Pierce has also created a da tabase of location information on the archival film holdings identified in the course of his research. See www.loc.gov/film. Commissioned for and sponsored by the National Film Preservation Board Council on Library and Information Resources and The Library of Congress Washington, D.C. The National Film Preservation Board The National Film Preservation Board was established at the Library of Congress by the National Film Preservation Act of 1988, and most recently reauthorized by the U.S. Congress in 2008. Among the provisions of the law is a mandate to “undertake studies and investigations of film preservation activities as needed, including the efficacy of new technologies, and recommend solutions to- im prove these practices.” More information about the National Film Preservation Board can be found at http://www.loc.gov/film/. ISBN 978-1-932326-39-0 CLIR Publication No. 158 Copublished by: Council on Library and Information Resources The Library of Congress 1707 L Street NW, Suite 650 and 101 Independence Avenue, SE Washington, DC 20036 Washington, DC 20540 Web site at http://www.clir.org Web site at http://www.loc.gov Additional copies are available for $30 each. Orders may be placed through CLIR’s Web site. This publication is also available online at no charge at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/pub158.
    [Show full text]
  • Call Me by Your Name
    Presents CALL ME BY YOUR NAME A film by Luca Guadagnino (131 min., USA/Italy/France/Brazil, 2017) Languages: English, Italian, French, German w/ English subtitles Distribution Publicity Bonne Smith Star PR 1352 Dundas St. West Tel: 416-488-4436 Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M6J 1Y2 Fax: 416-488-8438 Tel: 416-516-9775 Fax: 416-516-0651 E-mail: [email protected] E-mail: [email protected] www.mongrelmedia.com @MongrelMedia MongrelMedia CALL ME BY YOUR NAME The Cast Oliver ARMIE HAMMER Elio TIMOTHÉE CHALAMET Mr. Perlman MICHAEL STUHLBARG Annella AMIRA CASAR Marzia ESTHER GARREL Chiara VICTOIRE DU BOIS Mafalda VANDA CAPRIOLO Anchise ANTONIO RIMOLDI Art Historian 1 ELENA BUCCI Art Historian 2 MARCO SGROSSO Mounir ANDRÉ ACIMAN Isaac PETER SPEARS 2 CALL ME BY YOUR NAME The Filmmakers Director LUCA GUADAGNINO Screenplay JAMES IVORY Based on the Novel Call Me By Your Name by ANDRÉ ACIMAN Producers PETER SPEARS LUCA GUADAGNINO EMILIE GEORGES RODRIGO TEIXERA MARCO MORABITO JAMES IVORY HOWARD ROSENMAN Executive Producers DEREK SIMONDS TOM DOLBY MARGARETHE BAILLOU FRANCESCO MELZI D’ERIL NAIMA ABED NICHOLAS KAISER SOPHIE MAS LOURENÇO SANT’ANNA Director of Photography SAYOMBHU MUKDEEPROM Editor WALTER FASANO Production Designer SAMUEL DESHORS Costume Designer GIULIA PIERSANTI Songs “Mystery of Love” and “Visions of Gideon” Written and Performed by SUFJAN STEVENS Production Sound Mixer YVES-MARIE OMNES Re-Recording Mixer JEAN-PIERRE LAFORCE Music Supervisor ROBIN URDANG Music Consultant GERRY GERSHMAN Casting / Line Producer STELLA SAVINO Main Titles
    [Show full text]
  • Berkeley Art Museum·Pacific Film Archive W Inte R 2 0 18 – 19
    WINTER 2018–19 BERKELEY ART MUSEUM · PACIFIC FILM ARCHIVE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA PROGRAM GUIDE 100 YEARS OF COLLECTING JAPANESE ART ARTHUR JAFA MASAKO MIKI HANS HOFMANN FRITZ LANG & GERMAN EXPRESSIONISM INGMAR BERGMAN JIŘÍ TRNKA MIA HANSEN-LØVE JIA ZHANGKE JAMES IVORY JAPANESE FILM CLASSICS DOCUMENTARY VOICES OUT OF THE VAULT IN FOCUS: WRITING FOR CINEMA 1 / 2 / 3 / 4 CALENDAR DEC 9/SUN 21/FRI JAN 2:00 A Midsummer Night’s Dream 4:00 The Price of Everything P. 15 Introduction by Jan Pinkava 7:00 Fanny and Alexander BERGMAN P. 15 1/SAT TRNKA P. 12 3/THU 7:00 Full: Home Again—Tapestry 1:00 Making a Performance 1:15 Exhibition Highlights Tour P. 6 4:30 The Cabinet of Dr. Caligari P. 5 WORKSHOP P. 6 Reimagined Judith Rosenberg on piano 4–7 Five Tables of the Sea P. 4 5:30 The Good Soldier Švejk TRNKA P. 12 LANG & EXPRESSIONISM P. 16 22/SAT Free First Thursday: Galleries Free All Day 7:30 Persona BERGMAN P. 14 7:00 The Price of Everything P. 15 6:00 The Firemen’s Ball P. 29 5/SAT 2/SUN 12/WED 8:00 The Apartment P. 19 6:00 Future Landscapes WORKSHOP P. 6 12:30 Scenes from a 6:00 Arthur Jafa & Stephen Best 23/SUN Marriage BERGMAN P. 14 CONVERSATION P. 6 9/WED 2:00 Boom for Real: The Late Teenage 2:00 Guided Tour: Old Masters P. 6 7:00 Ugetsu JAPANESE CLASSICS P. 20 Years of Jean-Michel Basquiat P. 15 12:15 Exhibition Highlights Tour P.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Hollywood Production: Televising and Visualizing Global Filmmaking in 1960S Promotional Featurettes
    The Making of Hollywood Production: Televising and Visualizing Global Filmmaking in 1960s Promotional Featurettes by DANIEL STEINHART Abstract: Before making-of documentaries became a regular part of home-video special features, 1960s promotional featurettes brought the public a behind-the-scenes look at Hollywood’s production process. Based on historical evidence, this article explores the changes in Hollywood promotions when studios broadcasted these featurettes on television to market theatrical films and contracted out promotional campaigns to boutique advertising agencies. The making-of form matured in the 1960s as featurettes helped solidify some enduring conventions about the portrayal of filmmaking. Ultimately, featurettes serve as important paratexts for understanding how Hollywood’s global production work was promoted during a time of industry transition. aking-of documentaries have long made Hollywood’s flm production pro- cess visible to the public. Before becoming a staple of DVD and Blu-ray spe- M cial features, early forms of making-ofs gave audiences a view of the inner workings of Hollywood flmmaking and movie companies. Shortly after its formation, 20th Century-Fox produced in 1936 a flmed studio tour that exhibited the company’s diferent departments on the studio lot, a key feature of Hollywood’s detailed division of labor. Even as studio-tour short subjects became less common because of the restructuring of studio operations after the 1948 antitrust Paramount Case, long-form trailers still conveyed behind-the-scenes information. In a trailer for The Ten Commandments (1956), director Cecil B. DeMille speaks from a library set and discusses the importance of foreign location shooting, recounting how he shot the flm in the actual Egyptian locales where Moses once walked (see Figure 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Film and Video Archive
    Department of Film and Video archive, Title Department of Film and Video archive (fv001) Dates 1907-2009 [bulk 1970-2003] Creator Summary Quantity 200 linear feet of graphic material and textual records Restrictions on Access Language English Kate Barbera PDF Created January 20, 2016 Department of Film and Video archive, Page 2 of 65 Carnegie Museum of Art (CMOA) established the Film Section (subsequently, the Section of Film and Video and the Department of Film and Video) in 1970, making it one of the first museum-based film departments in the country. As part of the first wave of museums to celebrate moving image work, CMOA played a central role in legitimizing film as an art form, leading a movement that would eventually result in the integration of moving image artworks in museum collections worldwide. The department's active roster of programmingÐfeaturing historical screenings, director's retrospectives, and monthly appearances by experimental filmmakers from around the worldÐwas a leading factor in Pittsburgh's emergence in the 1970s as ªone of the most vibrant and exciting places in America for exploring cinema.º (Robert A. Haller, Crossroads: Avant-garde Film in Pittsburgh in the 1970s, 2005). The museum also served as a galvanizing force in the burgeoning field by increasing visibility and promoting the professionalization of moving image art through its publication of Film and Video Makers Travel Sheet (a monthly newsletter distributed to 2,000 subscribers worldwide) and the Film and Video Makers Directory (a listing of those involved in film and video production and exhibition) and by paying substantial honoraria to visiting filmmakers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 FEATURE FILM STUDY Photo: Diego Grandi / Shutterstock.Com TABLE of CONTENTS
    2016 FEATURE FILM STUDY Photo: Diego Grandi / Shutterstock.com TABLE OF CONTENTS ABOUT THIS REPORT 2 FILMING LOCATIONS 3 GEORGIA IN FOCUS 5 CALIFORNIA IN FOCUS 5 FILM PRODUCTION: ECONOMIC IMPACTS 8 6255 W. Sunset Blvd. FILM PRODUCTION: BUDGETS AND SPENDING 10 12th Floor FILM PRODUCTION: JOBS 12 Hollywood, CA 90028 FILM PRODUCTION: VISUAL EFFECTS 14 FILM PRODUCTION: MUSIC SCORING 15 filmla.com FILM INCENTIVE PROGRAMS 16 CONCLUSION 18 @FilmLA STUDY METHODOLOGY 19 FilmLA SOURCES 20 FilmLAinc MOVIES OF 2016: APPENDIX A (TABLE) 21 MOVIES OF 2016: APPENDIX B (MAP) 24 CREDITS: QUESTIONS? CONTACT US! Research Analyst: Adrian McDonald Adrian McDonald Research Analyst (213) 977-8636 Graphic Design: [email protected] Shane Hirschman Photography: Shutterstock Lionsgate© Disney / Marvel© EPK.TV Cover Photograph: Dale Robinette ABOUT THIS REPORT For the last four years, FilmL.A. Research has tracked the movies released theatrically in the U.S. to determine where they were filmed, why they filmed in the locations they did and how much was spent to produce them. We do this to help businesspeople and policymakers, particularly those with investments in California, better understand the state’s place in the competitive business environment that is feature film production. For reasons described later in this report’s methodology section, FilmL.A. adopted a different film project sampling method for 2016. This year, our sample is based on the top 100 feature films at the domestic box office released theatrically within the U.S. during the 2016 calendar
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Edinbugh University Press
    chapter 1 Introduction: The Return of the Epic Andrew B. R. Elliott n the spring of 2000, some three decades after the well-publicised flops of ICleopatra (Mankiewicz 1963), The Fall of the Roman Empire (MannPress 1964) and The Greatest Story Ever Told (Stevens 1965), unsuspecting cinema audi- ences were once again presented with the lavish and costly historical epics which had ruled the box office a generation earlier. Ridley Scott’s Gladiator, in a seemingly sudden departure from many of Scott’s previous films, told the epic tale of a Roman general-turned-gladiator ‘who defied an emperor’ and who (albeit posthumously) founded a new Roman Republic. Though few could have predicted it at the time, the global success of his film ‘resurrected long-standing traditions of historical and cinematic spectacles’,1 and Scott would later find himself credited with re-launching a genreUniversity which had lain dormant for 35 years, heralding ‘a sudden resurrection of toga films after thirty-six years in disgrace and exile’, which prompted critics and scholars alike emphatically to declare the return of the epic.2 Indeed, looking back over the first decade of the twenty- first century, in terms of films and box-office takings the effect of this return is clear: in each year from 2000 to 2010, historical epics have made the top ten highest-grossing films, and attracted numerous awards and nominations.3 Accordingly,Copyright from Gladiator to The Immortals (Singh 2011), via Troy (Petersen 2004), Kingdom of Heaven (Scott 2005) and Alexander (Stone 2004), the decade came to be Edinbughcharacterised by a slew of historically-themed, costly, spectacular, lavish – in a word, ‘epic’ – films which, though not always as profitable as might have been hoped, performed respectably at the box office.
    [Show full text]