DOCSLIB.ORG

Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia Esula)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia Esula) MANAGEMENT OF A3924-30 Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula) INVASIVE PLANTS IN WISCONSIN earfy spurge is an herbaceous, Ecological threat: creeping perennial, 6–36” tall. • Invades grasslands, pastures, prairies, Brendon Panke, Ryan deRegnier, LStems are smooth and often grow and old fields. and Mark Renz in clusters from an extensive, deep root • Can drastically reduce (50–75%) system. A white, milky latex is present in all productivity of grasslands. parts of the plant. Legal classification in Wisconsin: nvasive plants can thrive Restricted Non-chemical control and aggressively spread Leaves: Leaves are linear, alternate, and Removal I have slightly wavy, smooth margins with Effectiveness in season: 50–70% a bluish green color. Leaves are 0.25–0.5” beyond their natural range, Season after treatment: < 50% wide and 1–4” long. disrupting ecosystems. The Pulling is only appropriate for suppression Flowers: Late spring to summer. The of very small populations or populations in flowers are small, green, and are borne Management of Invasive Plants their first year of growth. Older populations in clustered yellow-green bracts. These do not respond well to pulling because it in Wisconsin series explains how bracts develop in late spring, and the is difficult to remove the entire root. If the flowers develop within the bracts by to identify invasive plants and root is not removed, it will resprout. early summer. provides common management Fruits and seeds: Seeds are 0.08” long, Cultivation options. Management methods oblong, gray to purple, and are borne in pods which contain three seeds. When Effectiveness in season: 50–70% recommend specific timings mature, seed capsules shatter, scattering Season after treatment: < 50% seeds. Intensive cultivation can eradicate for treatment, as well as Roots: Brown, woody roots with pinkish populations. Cultivate 4” deep 2–4 weeks expected effectiveness. For more buds. Plants have a taproot, which may after leafy spurge emerges in the spring; extend to the water table, and lateral for 1–2 years, continue to cultivate at three- information, go to: roots that can extend to 15’ beyond the week intervals until the ground freezes. main taproot. Success has also been documented if leafy fyi.uwex.edu/weedsci/category/ spurge is cultivated twice each fall for three Similar species: A number of native years. Cultivation can spread roots into invasive-plants-of-wisconsin. species also have white, milky sap previously uninfested areas. (e.g., milkweed species and flowering spurge), but milkweed species have a distinct long seedpod, and flowering spurge is distinguished by white flowers. Cypress spurge (Euphorbia cyparissias) is another non-native species that is often confused with leafy spurge. Cypress Cooperative Extension spurge has a similar flower, but is a shorter plant (6–15” tall) with needle- NPM like leaves. MANAGEMENT OF INVASIVE PLANTS IN WISCONSIN best long-term control. Do not skip a Mowing Biological control year until control reaches 90% or more; Effectiveness in season: 50–70% Effectiveness in season: < 50% otherwise leafy spurge will reinfest rapidly. Season after treatment: < 50% Season after treatment: < 50% Mowing does not eradicate leafy spurge, The three commonly recommended 2,4-D* but if repeated at 2–4-week intervals agents for biological control of leafy Effectiveness in season: 50–70% during the growing season, it can suppress spurge are Aphthona nigriscutis, A. Season after treatment: < 50% populations and reduce seed production. lacertosa, and A. czwalinae. The larvae of Common name: Many Mowing can also provide uniform these agents are root borers and feed on regrowth, which can improve herbicide foliage as adults. Grazing in conjunction Rate: effectiveness. After mowing, populations with biological control has been shown broadcast: 1.0–1.5 lb a.e./A should be allowed to grow for 3–5 weeks to be very effective. This combination spot: For a 3.8 lb a.e./gal product. 1–2% before an herbicide is applied. of methods typically takes 4–5 years to (0.04–0.08 lb a.e./gal) reduce leafy spurge cover to < 10%. To Timing: Apply twice a year: once during Prescribed burning release biocontrol agents in your state, late bud stage when bracts begin contact the Department of Agriculture for to yellow and again in the fall when Effectiveness in season: 50–70% the required permit. regrowth is 4–6” tall. Season after treatment: < 50% Remarks: This herbicide will not eliminate Spring burns can kill germinating seedlings Manipulation of the a population when used as the only and suppress above-ground growth of control method, but it can be useful established plants, depending on fire environment when paired with other control intensity. Fire may benefit other species Effectiveness in season: < 50% methods. The use of 2,4-D in the spring well-adapted to this management (e.g., Season after treatment: < 50% will eliminate the production of seed. prairie grasses), resulting in improved Interseeding with competitive grass can competition with leafy spurge. A handheld Caution: Use aquatically labeled product suppress leafy spurge populations up to propane torch can be effective for treating if potential exists for solution to contact 80% once the grasses become established. seedlings. A combination of burning and surface water. Use of this chemical This treatment will rarely eliminate herbicide applications typically takes 4–5 in areas where soils are permeable, leafy spurge; therefore, integrating this years to provide > 95% suppression of a particularly where the water table is method with another control method is leafy spurge population. shallow, may result in groundwater recommended. contamination. Overspray or drift to Grazing desirable plants should be avoided since Chemical control even minute quantities of the spray may Effectiveness in season: < 50% cause severe injury to plants. Season after treatment: < 50% Foliar Grazing with sheep or goats can be used Apply directly to individual plants aminocyclopyrachlor + chlorsulfuron* to suppress populations. Grazing when or broadcast across an infested area. Effectiveness in season: 90–100% bracts are present, but before seeds Broadcasted foliar applications are typically Season after treatment: 70–90% are produced, has shown the greatest the most-cost effective treatment in dense reduction in spurge biomass. If mature infestations. Use lower rates on smaller Common name: Perspective seeds are consumed, animals must be plants and less dense populations and Rate: isolated until the seeds pass through the higher rates on larger plants and denser broadcast: 4.75–8.0 oz/A digestive system to prevent further spread populations. Absorption of herbicide can (aminocyclopyrachlor: 1.9–3.15 oz a.i./A of seed. Grazing in conjunction with a fall be limited with this species, resulting + chlorsulfuron: 0.75–1.25 oz a.i./A) chemical treatment is very effective. This in reduced effectiveness. Including a spot: 0.2–0.3 oz/gal combination of methods typically takes recommended surfactant can alleviate any (aminocyclopyrachlor: 0.08–0.12 oz a.i./ 4–5 years to provide > 95% suppression of potential reduction in effectiveness. When gal + chlorsulfuron: 0.03–0.05 oz a.i./gal) a leafy spurge population. using residual herbicides (e.g., picloram, Timing: Apply to flowering plants or in fall aminocyclopyachlor), treat 15’ outside the before a killing frost. Fall applications edge of a population to reduce resprouting show the most consistent results. from roots in subsequent years. No single treatment will eradicate this plant. An annual treatment program provides the *Active ingredient (a.i.) 2 LEAFY SPURGE Caution: Do not apply directly to water avoided since even minute quantities desirable plants should be avoided since or to areas where surface water is of the spray may cause severe injury to even minute quantities of the spray may present. Avoid using Perspective in areas plants. Do not compost treated plants cause severe injury to plants. where soils are permeable, particularly since herbicide can persist through where the water table is shallow, since composting process. imazapic* groundwater contamination may result. Effectiveness in season: 90–100% Perspective remains in the soil for dicamba* Season after treatment: 50–70% months, depending on application rate, Effectiveness in season: 50–70% and has the potential to contaminate Common name: Plateau Season after treatment: < 50% surface runoff water, especially on Rate: poorly draining soils or areas with Common name: Banvel broadcast: 6–12 fl oz/A shallow groundwater. Maintenance of a Rate: (0.1–0.2 lb a.e./A) vegetative buffer strip is recommended broadcast: 64–128 fl oz/A (2–4 lb a.e./A) spot: 0.25–1.0% (0.005–0.02 lb a.e./gal) between the areas Perspective is spot: Equivalent to broadcast rates. Timing: Apply in fall before a killing frost. applied and surface water features. Timing: Apply to flowering plants or in fall Overspray or drift to desirable plants Remarks: Add methylated seed oil (MSO) before a killing frost. Fall applications should be avoided since even minute to the mixture as per label instructions. show the most consistent results. quantities of the spray may cause severe Caution: Do not apply directly to water or injury to plants. Do not compost treated Remarks: Two to three years of repeated to areas where surface water is present. plants since herbicide can persist applications are typically needed. If Use of this chemical in areas where through composting process. repeated, this treatment can achieve soils are permeable, particularly where more than 80% suppression. the water table is shallow, may result in aminocyclopyrachlor + metsulfuron* Caution: Do not apply directly to water or groundwater contamination. Imazapic to areas where surface water is present. can remain in the soil for months, Effectiveness in season: 90–100% Use of this chemical in areas where depending on application rate, and has Season after treatment: 70–90%% soils are permeable, particularly where the potential to contaminate surface Common name: Streamline the water table is shallow, may result in runoff water during this timeframe.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Management of Invasive Plants and Pests of Illinois
    MANAGEMENT OF INVASIVE PLANTS AND PESTS OF ILLINOIS AUTHORS Tricia Bethke, Forest Pest Outreach Coordinator, The Morton Arboretum Christopher Evans, Extension Forester, UIUC NRES ORIGINAL AUTHOR Karla Gage, Southern Illinois University 2 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This publication was funded, in part, through a grant from the Illinois Forestry Development Council (ifdc.nres.illinois.edu). Management of Invasive Plants and Pests of Illinois is an update and expansion of the original Management of Invasive Plants of Southern Illinois. The authors wish to acknowledge the Illinois Wildlife Preservation Fund, which supported the creation of the original document. The authors wish to thank The Morton Arboretum and Kurt Dreisilker, Mark Hochsprung, Mark McKinney and Clair Ryan for their edits and review of this document. The authors wish to thank The Morton Arboretum’s Natural Areas Conservation Training Program, which is generously funded by the Tellabs Foundation, for support, in part, of the publication of this guide. The authors wish to thank the USDA Animal Plant and Health Inspection Service which supported, in part, the update and publication of this document. The authors wish to thank the River to River Cooperative Weed Management Area and Kevin Rohling for assisting in the development of this publication. The Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Sciences and Extension Forestry at the University of Illinois would like to thank and acknowledge the Renewable Resources Extension Act (RREA) and the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture
    [Show full text]
  • Observational Monitoring of Biological Control Vs. Herbicide to Suppress Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia Esula) for Eight Years
    Session 9 Post-release Evaluation and Management 417 Observational Monitoring of Biological Control vs. Herbicide to Suppress Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) for Eight Years R. A. Progar1, G. Markin2, D. Scarbrough3, C. L. Jorgensen4 and T. Barbouletos5 1USDA Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, 3200 Jefferson Way, Corvallis, OR 97331 [email protected] 2USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 1648 South 7th Avenue, MSU Campus, Bozeman, MT 59717-2780 [email protected] 3USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Protection, Boise Field Office, 1249 Vinnell Way, Suite 200, Boise, ID 83709 [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract The effectiveness of Aphthona flea beetles (87 percent A. lacertosa Rosenhauer and A. czwalinae Weise, and 13 percent A. nigriscutis Foudras) as biological control agents of leafy spurge, Ephorbia esula L. was compared with a single application of herbicide (picloram) and untreated plots for a period of 8 years. Percentage of cover of leafy spurge, grasses; and flea beetle numbers were measured each year from 2000 through 2007. Cover of leafy spurge on Aphthona biological control plots exhibited annual declines until 2005. In 2006, these plots showed a temporary rebound in leafy spurge coverage followed by a decline in 2007. Spurge cover increased on the herbicide-treated plots and remained unchanged on the untreated check plots from 2000 through 2003. In 2003, the flea beetles began to emigrate from the release points within the biological control plots and dispersed throughout much of the surrounding leafy spurge infested area including the herbicide treated and check plots. This dispersal and colonization caused a subsequent decline in spurge cover on the herbicide-treated and control plots from 2004 through 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Two-Step Contractions of Inverted Repeat Region and Psai Gene Duplication from the Plastome of Croton Tiglium (Euphorbiaceae)
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 23 November 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201807.0458.v2 Two-Step Contractions of Inverted Repeat Region and psaI Gene Duplication from the Plastome of Croton tiglium (Euphorbiaceae) Sangjin Jo and Ki-Joong Kim School of Life Sciences, Korea University, Seoul 02841, Korea Corresponding author Ki-Joong Kim Anam-ro, Seoul, 02841, Korea Email address: [email protected] Abstract Croton L. (Euphorbiaceae) is a very specious genus and consists of about 1,250 species, mainly distributed in the New World. The first complete plastome sequence from the genus, Croton tiglium, is reported in this study (NCBI acc. no. MH394334). The plastome is 150,021 bp in length. The lengths of LSC and SSC are 111,654 bp and 18,167 bp, respectively. However, the length of the IR region is only 10,100 bp and includes only four rrn and four trn genes, and a small part of the ycf1 gene. We propose two-step IR contractions to explain this unique IR region of the C. tiglium plastome. First, the IR contracted from rps19-rpl2 to ycf2-trnL-CAA on the LSC/IRb boundary. Second, the IR contracted from ycf2-trnL-CAA to rrn16-trnV-GAC on the LSC/IRa boundary. In addition, duplicated copies of psaI genes were discovered in the C. tiglium plastome. Both copies were located side by side between accD and ycf4 genes, but one copy was pseudogenized because of a five-basepair (TAGCT) insertion in the middle of the gene and following frameshift mutation. The plastome contains 112 genes, of which 78 are protein-coding genes, 30 are tRNA genes, and four are rRNA genes.
    [Show full text]
  • Field Guide for Managing Leafy Spurge in the Southwest
    United States Department of Agriculture Field Guide for Managing Leafy Spurge in the Southwest Forest Southwestern Service Region TP-R3-16-12 Revised June 2017 Cover Photos Upper left: Steve Dewey, Utah State University, Bugwood.org Right: John M. Randall, The Nature Conservancy, Bugwood.org Lower left: George Markham, Forest Service, Bugwood.org In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. Additionally, program information may be made available in languages other than English. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolutionary Fate of Rpl32 and Rps16 Losses in the Euphorbia Schimperi (Euphorbiaceae) Plastome Aldanah A
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN The evolutionary fate of rpl32 and rps16 losses in the Euphorbia schimperi (Euphorbiaceae) plastome Aldanah A. Alqahtani1,2* & Robert K. Jansen1,3 Gene transfers from mitochondria and plastids to the nucleus are an important process in the evolution of the eukaryotic cell. Plastid (pt) gene losses have been documented in multiple angiosperm lineages and are often associated with functional transfers to the nucleus or substitutions by duplicated nuclear genes targeted to both the plastid and mitochondrion. The plastid genome sequence of Euphorbia schimperi was assembled and three major genomic changes were detected, the complete loss of rpl32 and pseudogenization of rps16 and infA. The nuclear transcriptome of E. schimperi was sequenced to investigate the transfer/substitution of the rpl32 and rps16 genes to the nucleus. Transfer of plastid-encoded rpl32 to the nucleus was identifed previously in three families of Malpighiales, Rhizophoraceae, Salicaceae and Passiforaceae. An E. schimperi transcript of pt SOD-1- RPL32 confrmed that the transfer in Euphorbiaceae is similar to other Malpighiales indicating that it occurred early in the divergence of the order. Ribosomal protein S16 (rps16) is encoded in the plastome in most angiosperms but not in Salicaceae and Passiforaceae. Substitution of the E. schimperi pt rps16 was likely due to a duplication of nuclear-encoded mitochondrial-targeted rps16 resulting in copies dually targeted to the mitochondrion and plastid. Sequences of RPS16-1 and RPS16-2 in the three families of Malpighiales (Salicaceae, Passiforaceae and Euphorbiaceae) have high sequence identity suggesting that the substitution event dates to the early divergence within Malpighiales.
    [Show full text]
  • Lack of Native Vegetation Recovery Following Biological Control of Leafy Spurge Jack L
    Rangeland Ecology & Management Lack of Native Vegetation Recovery Following Biological Control of Leafy Spurge Jack L. Butler1 and Stefanie D. Wacker2 Authors are 1Supervisory Ecologist and and 2Ecologist, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest and Grassland Research Laboratory, Rapid City, SD 57702, USA. Rangeland Ecol Manage 63:553–563 | September 2010 | DOI: 10.2111/REM-D-09-00075.1 Lack of Native Vegetation Recovery Following Biological Control of Leafy Spurge Jack L. Butler1 and Stefanie D. Wacker2 Authors are 1Supervisory Ecologist and and 2Ecologist, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Forest and Grassland Research Laboratory, Rapid City, SD 57702, USA. Abstract Leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula L.) is an aggressive exotic species that has been successfully suppressed in a variety of situations using classical biological control (flea beetles; Aphthona spp.). This 9-yr study investigated patterns of vegetation responses following significant reductions in leafy spurge cover and density by flea beetles in southeastern Montana. We hypothesized that the vegetation following leafy spurge suppression would be dominated by species and plant functional groups able to persist through heavy infestations. Flea beetles were first released in 1998, and by 2006 leafy spurge foliar cover was reduced 80% to 90% compared to 1998 values on both release and nonrelease plots. Although total cover of the resident vegetation, excluding leafy spurge, increased 72% to 88%, relative cover of the functional groups (native forbs, native sedges, native grasses, and non- native species) was similar among years and between release and nonrelease plots. Mean diversity and mean species richness values did not differ among years or between release and nonrelease plots (P , 0.05), but mean diversity on both release and nonrelease plots was significantly less than noninfested plots, although richness was similar (P , 0.05).
    [Show full text]
  • Leafy Spurge Euphorbia Esula L
    leafy spurge Euphorbia esula L. Synonyms: Euphorbia croizatii Hurusawa, E. cyparissias Linnaeus, E. distincta Stscheglejew, E. eriophylla Karelin & Kirilov, E. esula var. latifolia Ledebour, E. leoncroizatii Oudejans, E. unulata Bunge, E. maackii Meinshausen, E. mandshurica Maximowicz, E. minxianensis W. T. Wang, E. nakaiana H. Léveillé, E. octoradiata H. Léveillé & Vaniot, E. subcordata C. A. Meyer ex Ledebour, E. takouensis H. Léveillé & Vaniot, E. tarokoensis Hayata, Tithymalus esula (Linnaeus) Hill, T. lunulatus (Bunge) Soják, T. mandshuricus (Maximowicz) Soják, T. subcordatus Klotzsch & Garcke Other common names: spurge, wolf’s milk Family: Euphorbiaceae Introduction There is no consensus among taxonomists as to whether leafy spurge is a single species or a complex of several species, varieties, and hybrids. The invasive leafy spurge known in North America may be a hybrid, or a series of hybrids, of two or more species (Crompton et al. 1990, Kreps 2000). Invasiveness Rank: 84 The invasiveness rank is calculated based on a species’ ecological impacts, biological attributes, distribution, and response to control measures. The ranks are scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 representing a plant that poses no threat to native ecosystems and 100 representing a plant that poses a major threat to native ecosystems. Description Leafy spurge is a perennial herb that grows from an extensive rootstock, which can reach depths of 4 ½ meters or more. Numerous buds on horizontal roots give rise to new shoots. Stems are erect, glabrous, branched above, and somewhat woody. They grow up to 91 cm tall. The entire plant contains milky sap from the seedling stage onward. The leaves are bluish green, alternate (but often crowded enough to appear opposite or whorled), sessile, broadly linear, up to 7 ½ cm long, and 6 mm wide.
    [Show full text]
  • LEAFY SPURGE Euphorbia Esula
    New Invasive Plants of the Midwest Fact Sheet LEAFY SPURGE Euphorbia esula Description: Leafy spurge is a perennial herb that grows 2-3 feet high. Leaves are alternate, narrow with pointed tips, smooth and hairless. The flowers are located on paired, yellowish-green, cup-shaped bracts. Bracts are seen in clus- ters of 7-10 at the top of the stem. Leafy spurge blooms from late spring to mid-summer. Seedpods are attached to the center of paired bracts. Native range: Europe and Asia (http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/eues1.htm) Ecological threat: This plant threatens prairies, grass- lands, savannas, sand dunes and open woodlands. It displaces native vegetation by shading, usurping avail- able water and nutrients, and through plant toxins that prevent the growth of other plants underneath it. It is very aggressive and can quickly overtake large areas of land. Current North American Range: Leafy spurge is cur- rently observed throughout all of Minnesota, Wisconsin, Michigan, Illinois, and southern Ontario. It can also be found in northern areas of Iowa, Missouri, Indiana, and southern Ohio. Early Detection and Rapid Response Can Help Stop the Spread! LEAFY SPURGE, Euphorbia esula MANAGEMENT OPTIONS: (http://www.nps.gov/plants/alien/fact/eues1.htm) Because of its persistent nature and ability to regenerate from small pieces of root, leafy spurge is extremely difficult to eradicate. Biological methods Biological control offers a highly promising management tactic for leafy spurge. The U.S. Department of Agriculture has shown success using six natural enemies of leafy spurge imported from Europe. These include a stem and root-boring beetle (Oberea erythrocephala), four root-mining flea beetles (Aphthona spp.) and a shoot-tip gall midge (Spurgia esulae).
    [Show full text]
  • Leafy Spurge, Euphorbia Esula L
    May, 1936 Research Bulletin 198 Leafy Spurge, Euphorbia Esula L. By A. L. BAKKE AGRICULTURAL EXPERIMENT STATION IOWA STATE COLLEGE OF AGRICULTURE AND MECHANIC ARTS R. E. BUCHANAN, Director BOTANY AND PLANT PATHOLOGY SECTION AMES, IOWA CONTENTS PAGE Description . 209 Distribution of EuphoTbia Esula in Iowa 211 Introduction of leafy spurge 213 Euphorbia Esula L. and Euphorbia Virgata Waldst. and Kit. 213 General characters of Euphorbia. 222 Flowering and fruiting habits 223 Pollination 228 Seed studies 228 Description of seed 228 Weight of seeds 229 Absorption of water 229 Temperature relations . 230 Absorption in solution of sodium chlorate 231 Toxic effect of calcium chloride and sodium chloride 232 Seed dispersals by birds 233 The root system of EuphodJia EStLla 235 Food storage 238 Leaf of Euphm·bia Esula 239 The stem of EuphoTbia Esula 241 The latex system 242 Summary 242 Literature cited 245 Leafy Spurge, Euphorbia Esula L.l By A. L. BAKKE Leafy spurge (EttphoTbia Esula L.) has become a serious menace to agriculture in northwest Iowa and in the adjoining states, Minnesota, North and South Dakota. It was collected at Mount Pleasant (Henry County) in 1899 and at Ames (Story County) in 1907. This weed seems to develop most vigorously in northwestern Iowa, where large patches occur on many farms. In order to determine the most effective means of ex­ terminating this weed pest, it was necessary to learn more about its life history, growth, habits and structure in areas where it was well established. An attempt has been made in this publication to place leafy spurge in its correct place taxonomically and to discuss the flowering, fruiting habits, pollination, seed studies, seed dis­ persal, root system, leaf, stem and root structures.
    [Show full text]
  • Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia Esula) Restricted DESCRIPTION
    Weed Identification and Control Sheet: www.goodoak.com/weeds WI NR-40: Leafy Spurge (Euphorbia esula) Restricted DESCRIPTION: Leafy spurge is an invasive perennial originally from Eurasia, which can form large colonies in sunny areas, particularly dryer sites, utility right-of-ways and roadsides. The milky sap of leafy spurge is poisonous to most livestock and the plants will not be eaten by cattle. Leafy spurge has the ability to invade natural areas including prairie remnants and displace native plants by beginning growth early in the spring. Additionally, leafy spurge produces allelopathic chemicals that sup- press the growth of other plants. Leafy spurge propagates primarily by under- ground roots (rhizomes), which can spread up to 40 ft. laterally per year and as deep as 25 ft. into the soil. Rhizomes near the surface develop buds which will sprout into new above ground stem, this is the plants primary means of spread. Leafy spurge can also spread by seed, each stem producing up to 200 seeds, which can be expelled up to 15 ft. when they ripen in late-July. The seeds of leafy spurge have a high germination rate and remain viable in the soil for up to 8 years. It is legally classified as a noxious weed in nineteen states including Wisconsin. Leafy spurge most commonly grows to a height of 12-30”, and can form massive colonies, which stand out in the landscape when the yellow-green colored flowers bloom in early-June. The true flowers, which bloom in June, are very small with petals that are fused together in a roughly circular shape around the stalk.
    [Show full text]
  • Euphorbia Esula
    Euphorbia esula INTRODUCTORY DISTRIBUTION AND OCCURRENCE BOTANICAL AND ECOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS FIRE EFFECTS AND MANAGEMENT MANAGEMENT CONSIDERATIONS APPENDIX: FIRE REGIME TABLE REFERENCES INTRODUCTORY AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION FEIS ABBREVIATION NRCS PLANT CODE COMMON NAMES TAXONOMY SYNONYMS LIFE FORM Leafy spurge infestation in Montana. Photo © Norman E. Rees, USDA Agricultural Research Service. AUTHORSHIP AND CITATION: Gucker, Corey L. 2010. Euphorbia esula. In: Fire Effects Information System, [Online]. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fire Sciences Laboratory (Producer). Available: http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis/ [2011, January 19]. FEIS ABBREVIATION: EUPESU NRCS PLANT CODE [221]: EUES EUESE EUESU COMMON NAMES: leafy spurge Wolf's milk TAXONOMY: The scientific name of leafy spurge is Euphorbia esula subg. Esula L. (Euphorbiaceae) [43,59,90,156]. Kartesz [90] recognizes 3 leafy spurge varieties: leafy spurge (Euphorbia esula var. esula), Oriental leafy spurge (E. esula var. orientalis), and Russian leafy spurge (E. esula var. uralensis). Plants Database [221] recognizes only 2 varieties: leafy spurge and Russian leafy spurge. However, after analyzing 26 morphological characters for 600 Euphorbia species within the Esula subgenus, Crompton and others [43] concluded that in North America, leafy spurge is a single, variable species and has hybridized only with cypress spurge (E. cyparissias). Considerable taxonomic confusion surrounds leafy spurge varieties, subspecies, and hybrids (see the Synonyms section below). Likely multiple introductions of leafy spurge into North America resulted in a complex of variable genotypes [115]. Hybrids: Only the tetraploid cypress spurge type is known to hybridize with leafy spurge [148,167], resulting in the hybrid, Euphorbia × pseudoesula Schur.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Evolution of Rosids
    Oxalidales • small, heterogeneous, novel group Diversity and of 6 families - seed character? Oxalidaceae Evolution of Rosids Wood sorrels . violets, willows, and spurges . Cephalotaceae Australian pitcher plant Oxalidaceae - wood sorrels Oxalidaceae - wood sorrels 6 genera, 770 species in the tropics and temperate areas - 700 6 genera, 770 species in the tropics and temperate areas - 700 belong to Oxalis (wood sorrel) belong to Oxalis (wood sorrel) • plants are herbaceous creepers or woody Oxalis corniculata - creeping yellow wood sorrel • typically 3-foliate vines leaves (the real shamrock) • leaves are acidic to taste due to oxalic acid in the form of calcium oxalate Oxalidaceae - wood sorrels Oxalidaceae - wood sorrels CA 5 CO 5 A 5+5 G (5) • 5 merous flowers CA 5 CO 5 A 5+5 G (5) • 5 merous flowers Oxalis corniculata Oxalis • fruits are 5 locular & Oxalis corniculata Oxalis • fruits are 5 locular & winged capsules or berries winged capsules or berries • tristyly common (3 levels at which 2 sets of anthers and 1 set of styles position) U U U Oxalidaceae - wood sorrels Oxalidaceae - wood sorrels • common native and introduced wood-sorrels • tropical fruit - carambola or star fruit: note 5 carpellate structure Oxalis stricta - Oxalis violaceae - tall wood-sorrel violet wood-sorrel Averrhoa carambola Oxalis acetosella - wood-sorrel *Malpighiales *Malpighiales • large and diverse group of 38 • unresolved! “novel” clade families - many of them • leaf margin teeth contributing importantly to tropical • “Parietales” subclade (placentation) forest diversity • hosts for Cymothoe butterflies *Malpighiales *Violaceae - violets • unusual life forms 23 genera, 800 species of herbs (temperate) to vines and small trees (tropics). 400-600 of them are violets (Viola).
    [Show full text]