Pittura Di Luce a Brera

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pittura Di Luce a Brera Pittura di luce a Brera La definizione “pittura di luce” è stata coniata dalla critica in anni recenti per descrivere una breve ma significativa stagione dell'arte centro italiana di metà Quattrocento, legata in particolare a Domenico Veneziano. In essa il rigore prospettico si unisce allo studio dei percorsi luminosi, i toni cromatici si schiariscono e le forme, rese attraverso volumi sintetici, misurano con la loro concreta presenza il contesto spaziale in cui sono inserite. La fucina di queste esperienze è Firenze, dove giungono artisti da ogni parte della Penisola, attratti dalle possibilità di lavoro accanto a maestri come Beato Angelico, Domenico Veneziano, Filippo Lippi. Anche Giovanni di Francesco del Cervelliera (il “Maestro di Pratovecchio”) si forma sui loro esempi, e la Madonna col Bambino appena acquistata dalla Pinacoteca di Brera ne è testimonianza. Questo percorso si svolge dunque fra dipinti braidensi che, come la tavola del Maestro di Pratovecchio, hanno (sia pure in modo e misura diversi) comuni riferimenti alla stagione fiorentina della “pittura di luce”. I documenti ci informano della presenza a Firenze, dal 1443, del pittore camerinese Giovanni Angelo d’Antonio. Nel suo polittico (7° decennio XV sec., Sala XXI) le figure umane, costruite attraverso volumi geometrizzanti, sono investite da una luce forte e diffusa. Sebbene le figure appaiano come compresse nello spazio limitato delle edicole, l’impostazione prospettica è studiata, in particolare nel trono scorciato della Vergine o, ad esempio, nel galero di San Gerolamo (estrema destra nel registro superiore): i due fiocchi scarlatti che pendono al di qua della mensola proiettano la propria ombra sul davanzale, misurando così la profondità dello spazio. L'opera è di circa due decenni successiva al soggiorno fiorentino del suo autore, ma porta ancora evidenti i segni di quell’esperienza soprattutto nell’attenzione ai percorsi della luce e nella limpidezza dei toni cromatici. Proprio un incomprensibile scarto in questo rigore (nel registro superiore la luce viene da sinistra mentre in quello inferiore viene da destra) ha fatto notare alla critica che l’opera nasce dall’assemblaggio novecentesco di due politici differenti, ed ha permesso dunque di ricostruirne la storia. Accanto ad essa vediamo una tavola raffigurante San Pietro (6° decennio XV sec., Sala XXI), attribuita a Bartolomeo di Giovanni Corradini detto Fra Carnevale. L’artista, di nascita e formazione urbinate, è a Firenze nel 1445 come collaboratore di Filippo Lippi. Il frutto di tale frequentazione si scorge nel panneggio e nella barba del santo, resi con il tratto guizzante ed energico proprio del maestro toscano. La luce viene dall’alto e scivola sulle sobrie cornici a finto marmo dello sfondo, segnando in modo impietoso le fragilità fisiche del santo. Anche se si tratta di un singolo pannello, dalla cura con cui il pittore segna la disposizione spaziale dei piedi possiamo intuire l’attenzione che doveva avere riservato all’organizzazione prospettica complessiva, sull’esempio dell’ultima attività fiorentina di Domenico Veneziano In questa breve rassegna l’unico pittore fiorentino di nascita è Benozzo Gozzoli, allievo e stretto collaboratore di Beato Angelico. Nella tavoletta San Domenico risuscita Napoleone Orsini ucciso da un cavallo (7° decennio XV sec., prossimamente nella Sala XXI), proveniente da una predella smembrata, il pittore regala un racconto di estrema freschezza narrativa, dai colori molto vivaci. La fonte di luce proviene da sinistra e invade tutto l’ambiente, esaltandosi nell'intenso chiarore delle architetture, della tunica del santo, del manto del cavallo. La sua funzione unificatrice è resa ancor più esplicita dall’ambientazione esterna della scena. Un’atmosfera più cupa pervade il Cristo in pietà tra la Vergine e San Giovanni (7° decennio XV sec., prossimamente nella Sala XXI), opera ancora di Benozzo e parte anch'essa di una predella andata perduta. Le figure, disposte simmetricamente, si stagliano su un paesaggio aperto, che si perde all’orizzonte. Il Cristo è perno della scena: attraverso il gesto delle braccia, distese verso i limiti del sarcofago, si pone al centro di una studiata piramide spaziale. La celebre Pala di Montefeltro (Sala XXIV) di Piero della Francesca conclude questo itinerario tra artisti toccati dalla “pittura di luce”. Piero è testimoniato a Firenze attorno al 1439, coinvolto proprio con Domenico Veneziano nella realizzazione di un ciclo di affreschi in Sant'Egidio ora perduti (le sue opere più antiche ci mostrano l’importanza che ebbe per lui questa esperienza). Nella tavola di Brera, che è uno dei suoi risultati più maturi, l’artista utilizza l’olio assieme alla tempera, restituendo magistralmente le morbide variazioni della luce sui corpi e velando di riflessi sottili anche le ombre. L'effetto complessivo è monumentale e verosimile. Le figure si dispongono in uno spazio sobrio e sontuoso allo stesso tempo, la cui struttura appare facile solo ad un osservatore superficiale: ad uno sguardo più attento, infatti, gli interrogativi sulle caratteristiche spaziali dell'ambiente si moltiplicano. L’uovo infine, che pende dalla conchiglia nell’abside, arricchisce l’opera di rimandi simbolici e ulteriori, facendone un meditato invito alla riflessione. Testi di Filippo Ciavarella con la supervisione dei Servizi Educativi della Pinacoteca di Brera .
Recommended publications
  • The Paintings and Sculpture Given to the Nation by Mr. Kress and Mr
    e. FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE THE COLLECTIONS OF THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART \YASHINGTON The National Gallery will open to the public on March 18, 1941. For the first time, the Mellon Collection, deeded to the Nation in 1937, and the Kress Collection, given in 1939, will be shown. Both collections are devoted exclusively to painting and sculpture. The Mellon Collection covers the principal European schools from about the year 1200 to the early XIX Century, and includes also a number of early American portraits. The Kress Collection exhibits only Italian painting and sculpture and illustrates the complete development of the Italian schools from the early XIII Century in Florence, Siena, and Rome to the last creative moment in Venice at the end of the XVIII Century. V.'hile these two great collections will occupy a large number of galleries, ample space has been left for future development. Mr. Joseph E. Videner has recently announced that the Videner Collection is destined for the National Gallery and it is expected that other gifts will soon be added to the National Collection. Even at the present time, the collections in scope and quality will make the National Gallery one of the richest treasure houses of art in the wor 1 d. The paintings and sculpture given to the Nation by Mr. Kress and Mr. Mellon have been acquired from some of -2- the most famous private collections abroad; the Dreyfus Collection in Paris, the Barberini Collection in Rome, the Benson Collection in London, the Giovanelli Collection in Venice, to mention only a few.
    [Show full text]
  • Western Painting Renaissance I Eastern Europe / Western Europe
    Introduction to Art Historical Research: Western Painting Renaissance I NTNU Graduate Institute of Art History September 23th 2009 ©2009 Dr Valentin Nussbaum, Associate Professor Eastern Europe / Western Europe •! Cult of images (icons) •! Culte of relics •! During the Middle Ages, images in Western Europe have a didactical purpose. They are pedagogical tools Conques, Abbatiale Sainte-Foy, Portail occidental, deuxième quart du 12ème s. 1 San Gimignano, view of the towers erected during the struggles between Ghelphs and Ghibellines factions (supporting respectively the Pope and the Holy Roman Emperor, ca. 1300 Bologne, The Asinelli and Garisenda Towers (height 98 metres) , 13th C. 2 Escorial. Codex T.I.1, fol. 50, Cantigas of Alfonso I, 13th C. Siena, Piazza del Campo with the Public Palace 3 Siena, (the Duomo (Cathedral and the Piazza del Campo with the Public Palace) Duccio di Buoninsegna, Polyptich No. 28, c. 1300-05, Tempera on wood 128 x 234 cm, Pinacoteca Nazionale, Siena 4 Ambrogio Lorenzetti, Altarpiece of St Proculus, 1332, 167 x 56 cm central panel and 145 x 43 cm each side panels, Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence Ambrogio Lorenzetti, Madonna and Child with Mary Magdalene and St Dorothea, c. 1325, (90 x 53 cm central panel 88 x 39 cm each side panels), Pinacoteca Nazionae, Siena 5 Duccio di Buoninsegna, Polyptich No. 28, c. 1300-05, Tempera on wood 128 x 234 cm, Pinacoteca Nazionae, Siena Ambrogio Lorenzetti, Madonna and Child with Mary Magdalene and St Dorothea, c. 1325, (90 x 53 cm central panel 88 x 39 cm each side panels),
    [Show full text]
  • Leonardo in Verrocchio's Workshop
    National Gallery Technical Bulletin volume 32 Leonardo da Vinci: Pupil, Painter and Master National Gallery Company London Distributed by Yale University Press TB32 prelims exLP 10.8.indd 1 12/08/2011 14:40 This edition of the Technical Bulletin has been funded by the American Friends of the National Gallery, London with a generous donation from Mrs Charles Wrightsman Series editor: Ashok Roy Photographic credits © National Gallery Company Limited 2011 All photographs reproduced in this Bulletin are © The National Gallery, London unless credited otherwise below. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including BRISTOL photocopy, recording, or any storage and retrieval system, without © Photo The National Gallery, London / By Permission of Bristol City prior permission in writing from the publisher. Museum & Art Gallery: fig. 1, p. 79. Articles published online on the National Gallery website FLORENCE may be downloaded for private study only. Galleria degli Uffizi, Florence © Galleria deg li Uffizi, Florence / The Bridgeman Art Library: fig. 29, First published in Great Britain in 2011 by p. 100; fig. 32, p. 102. © Soprintendenza Speciale per il Polo Museale National Gallery Company Limited Fiorentino, Gabinetto Fotografico, Ministero per i Beni e le Attività St Vincent House, 30 Orange Street Culturali: fig. 1, p. 5; fig. 10, p. 11; fig. 13, p. 12; fig. 19, p. 14. © London WC2H 7HH Soprintendenza Speciale per il Polo Museale Fiorentino, Gabinetto Fotografico, Ministero per i Beni e le Attività Culturali / Photo Scala, www.nationalgallery. org.uk Florence: fig. 7, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Two Parallels to Ancient Egyptian Scenes Montefalco, Florence, San Gimignano, and Pisa
    BULLETIN OF THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS VOLUME XXXV BOSTON, AUGUST, 1937 NUMBER 210 The Presentation of the Virgin Attributed to Fra Carnevale, active 1450- 1484 Charles Potter Kling Fund PUBLISHED BIMONTHLY SUBSCRIPTION ONE DOLLAR XXXV, 50 BULLETIN OF THE MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS worked in Urbino, was influenced strongly by Piero della Francesca, and was familiar with Umbrian architecture. We can suppose also that the artist knew the painting of the Marches, and was ac- quainted with the style of the Florentine painters Paolo Uccello, Domenico Veneziano, and Benozzo Gozzoli. As has been said before, the artist must have been trained as an architect as well as a painter. Whether the author of the paintings was Fra Carnevale or some other painter is impossible to say unless further information is brought to light. For want of a better name, therefore (and the use of a name at least evokes discussion), the attribu- tion to Fra Carnevale may as well be continued for the present. What is important, however, is the superb quality of the picture itself and its high position in the field of Renaissance painting. When one considers the fine draughtsmanshipof the architecture, the rhythmic flow of figures in the composition, thedignity and feel- ing for form, especially in the foreground figures, and finally the modernity of the whole conception, one finds that the painting stands on its own merits without the accompaniment of a great name to enhance its prestige. C. C. CUNNINGHAM. Fig. 5 (detail). Head of the Virgin's Mother Two Parallels to Ancient Egyptian Scenes Montefalco, Florence, San Gimignano, and Pisa.
    [Show full text]
  • III. RAPHAEL (1483-1520) Biographical and Background Information 1. Raffaello Santi Born in Urbino, Then a Small but Important C
    III. RAPHAEL (1483-1520) Biographical and background information 1. Raffaello Santi born in Urbino, then a small but important cultural center of the Italian Renaissance; trained by his father, Giovanni Santi. 2. Influenced by Perugino, Leonardo da Vinci, and Michelangelo; worked in Florence 1504-08, in Rome 1508-20, where his chief patrons were Popes Julius II and Leo X. 3. Pictorial structures and concepts: the picture plane, linear and atmospheric perspective, foreshortening, chiaroscuro, contrapposto. 4. Painting media a. Tempera (egg binder and pigment) or oil (usually linseed oil as binder); support: wood panel (prepared with gesso ground) or canvas. b. Fresco (painting on wet plaster); cartoon, pouncing, giornata. Selected works 5. Religious subjects a. Marriage of the Virgin (“Spozalizio”), 1504 (oil on roundheaded panel, 5’7” x 3’10”, Pinacoteca de Brera, Milan) b. Madonna of the Meadow, c. 1505 (oil on panel, 44.5” x 34.6”, Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna) c. Madonna del Cardellino (“Madonna of the Goldfinch”), 1506 (oil on panel, 3’5” x 2’5”, Uffizi Gallery, Florence) d. Virgin and Child with St. Sixtus and St. Barbara (“Sistine Madonna”), 1512-13 (oil on canvas, 8’8” x 6’5”, Gemäldegalerie, Dresden) 6. Portraits a. Agnolo Doni, c.1506 (oil on panel, 2’ ¾” x 1’5 ¾”, Pitti Palace, Florence) b. Maddalena Doni, c.1506 (oil on panel, 2’ ¾” x 1’5 ¾”, Pitti Palace, Florence) c. Cardinal Tommaso Inghirami, c. 1510-14 (oil on panel, 2’11 ¼” x 2’, Pitti Palace, Florence) d. Baldassare Castiglione, c. 1514-15 (oil on canvas, 2’8” x 2’2”, Louvre Museum, Paris) e.
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrations Ij
    Mack_Ftmat.qxd 1/17/2005 12:23 PM Page xiii Illustrations ij Fig. 1. Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise, ca. 1015, Doors of St. Michael’s, Hildesheim, Germany. Fig. 2. Masaccio, Expulsion of Adam and Eve from Paradise, ca. 1425, Brancacci Chapel, Church of Santa Maria del Carmine, Flo- rence. Fig. 3. Bernardo Rossellino, Facade of the Pienza Cathedral, 1459–63. Fig. 4. Bernardo Rossellino, Interior of the Pienza Cathedral, 1459–63. Fig. 5. Leonardo da Vinci, The Last Supper, 1495–98, Refectory of the Monastery of Santa Maria delle Grazie, Milan. Fig. 6. Anonymous Pisan artist, Pisa Cross #15, late twelfth century, Museo Civico, Pisa. Fig. 7. Anonymous artist, Cross of San Damiano, late twelfth century, Basilica of Santa Chiara, Assisi. Fig. 8. Giotto di Bondone, Cruci‹xion, ca. 1305, Arena (Scrovegni) Chapel, Padua. Fig. 9. Masaccio, Trinity Fresco, ca. 1427, Church of Santa Maria Novella, Florence. Fig. 10. Bonaventura Berlinghieri, Altarpiece of St. Francis, 1235, Church of San Francesco, Pescia. Fig. 11. St. Francis Master, St. Francis Preaching to the Birds, early four- teenth century, Upper Church of San Francesco, Assisi. Fig. 12. Anonymous Florentine artist, Detail of the Misericordia Fresco from the Loggia del Bigallo, 1352, Council Chamber, Misericor- dia Palace, Florence. Fig. 13. Florentine artist (Francesco Rosselli?), “Della Catena” View of Mack_Ftmat.qxd 1/17/2005 12:23 PM Page xiv ILLUSTRATIONS Florence, 1470s, Kupferstichkabinett, Staatliche Museen zu Berlin. Fig. 14. Present-day view of Florence from the Costa San Giorgio. Fig. 15. Nicola Pisano, Nativity Panel, 1260, Baptistery Pulpit, Baptis- tery, Pisa. Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thin White Line: Palladio, White Cities and the Adriatic Imagination
    Chapter � The Thin White Line: Palladio, White Cities and the Adriatic Imagination Alina Payne Over the course of centuries, artists and architects have employed a variety of means to capture resonant archaeological sites in images, and those images have operated in various ways. Whether recording views, monuments, inscrip- tions, or measurements so as to pore over them when they came home and to share them with others, these draftsmen filled loose sheets, albums, sketch- books, and heavily illustrated treatises and disseminated visual information far and wide, from Europe to the margins of the known world, as far as Mexico and Goa. Not all the images they produced were factual and aimed at design and construction. Rather, they ranged from reportage (recording what there is) through nostalgic and even fantastic representations to analytical records that sought to look through the fragmentary appearance of ruined vestiges to the “essence” of the remains and reconstruct a plausible original form. Although this is a long and varied tradition and has not lacked attention at the hands of generations of scholars,1 it raises an issue fundamental for the larger questions that are posed in this essay: Were we to look at these images as images rather than architectural or topographical information, might they emerge as more than representations of buildings, details and sites, measured and dissected on the page? Might they also record something else, something more ineffable, such as the physical encounters with and aesthetic experience of these places, elliptical yet powerful for being less overt than the bits of carved stone painstakingly delineated? Furthermore, might in some cases the very material support of these images participate in translating this aesthetic 1 For Italian material the list is long.
    [Show full text]
  • MICHELE DI GIOVANNI DA FIESOLE and the ORIGINS of the FLORENTINE PLAQUETTE by Michael Riddick Fig
    MICHELE DI GIOVANNI DA FIESOLE AND THE ORIGINS OF THE FLORENTINE PLAQUETTE by Michael Riddick Fig. 01: Virgin and Child within an Arch here attributed to Michele di Giovanni da Fiesole, bronze, ca. 1445-54, Florence, Italy (Wallace Collection, UK) Michele di Giovanni da Fiesole Michael Riddick - RenBronze.com and the origins of the Florentine plaquette 2 Michele di Giovanni da Fiesole and the origins of the Florentine plaquette A large rectangular relief of the Virgin and Child Italian Renaissance. As suggested by their subject within an Arch (Fig. 01) and a smaller arched relief and scale, both reliefs were intended for private of the Virgin and Child within a Niche (Fig. 02) devotional use. The larger relief could stand-alone are recognized as two of the earliest sculptural or may have served as the central panel for a house productions of what is today considered the genre altar.1 In one instance, it was appropriated as a of plaquettes, being the reproductive casting of tabernacle door.2 The smaller relief is unanimously small reliefs in metal with an origin in the early recognized as intended for use on paxes, to be set into a frame and used during the liturgy. Both reliefs show a distinct awareness of Donatello’s inventions. Douglas Lewis notes their rilievo schiacciato, a sophisticated technique of low-relief sculpture invented and popularized by Donatello.3 The larger relief reflects Donatello’s anatomical typology for the child Christ4 while the disappearance of the child’s arm behind the Virgin recalls an early relief portraying the Virgin and Child Christ within a Mantle attributed to a young Donatello or sometimes credited to Lorenzo Ghiberti.5 The architectural motif of the Virgin and Child within an Arch is frequently noted for its reflection of Donatello’s use of antique architecture to add perspectival depth to the scene, as noted and compared against his bronze relief of the Feast of Herod for the Baptistery Font Fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Painting Between Minds and Hands: Art Criticism, Connoisseurship, and Artistic Sodality in Early Modern Italy
    Collaborative Painting Between Minds and Hands: Art Criticism, Connoisseurship, and Artistic Sodality in Early Modern Italy by Colin Alexander Murray A thesis submitted in conformity with the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Art University of Toronto © Copyright by Colin Murray 2016 Collaborative Painting Between Minds and Hands: Art Criticism, Connoisseurship, and Artistic Sodality in Early Modern Italy Colin Alexander Murray Doctor of Philosophy Department of Art University of Toronto 2016 Abstract The intention of this dissertation is to open up collaborative pictures to meaningful analysis by accessing the perspectives of early modern viewers. The Italian primary sources from the fifteenth to the seventeenth centuries yield a surprising amount of material indicating both common and changing habits of thought when viewers looked at multiple authorial hands working on an artistic project. It will be argued in the course of this dissertation that critics of the seventeenth century were particularly attentive to the practical conditions of collaboration as the embodiment of theory. At the heart of this broad discourse was a trope extolling painters for working with what appeared to be one hand, a figurative and adaptable expression combining the notion of the united corpo and the manifold meanings of the artist’s mano. Hardly insistent on uniformity or anonymity, writers generally believed that collaboration actualized the ideals of a range of social, cultural, theoretical, and cosmological models in which variously formed types of unity were thought to be fostered by the mutual support of the artists’ minds or souls. Further theories arose in response to Giovanni Paolo Lomazzo’s hypothesis in 1590 that the greatest painting would combine the most highly regarded old masters, each contributing their particular talents towards the whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 1946
    REPORT ON THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART 1946 SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION WASHINGTON D. C. m&MsmmmmM REPORT ON THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART FOR THE YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1946 From the Smithsonian Report for 1946 Pages 35-52 UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON : 1947 APPENDIX 2 REPORT ON THE NATIONAL GALLERY OF ART SIR : I have the honor to submit, on behalf of the Board of Trustees of the National Gallery of Art, the ninth annual report of the Board, covering its operations for the fiscal year ended June 30, 1946. This report is made pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 (d) of Public Resolution No. 14, Seventy-fifth Congress, First Session, approved March 24, 1937 ( 50 Stat. 51). ORGANIZATION AND STAFF During the fiscal year ended June 30, 1946, the Board consisted of the Chief Justice of the United States, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Secretary of the Smithsonian Institu- tion, ex officio, and five general trustees, Samuel H. Kress, Ferdinand Lammot Belin, Duncan Phillips, Chester Dale, and Paul Mellon. At its annual meeting held on February 11,1946, the Board reelected Samuel H. Kress as President, and Ferdinand Lammot Belin as Vice President, to serve for the ensuing year. The executive officers con- tinuing in office during the year were: Huntington Cairns, Secretary-Treasurer. David E. Finley, Director. Harry A. McBride, Administrator. Huntington Cairns, General Counsel. John Walker, Chief Curator. Macgill James, Assistant Director. Donald D. Shepard continued to serve during the year as Adviser to the Board. During the year Margaret D.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking the Cinque Terre
    INSIDE: The Secret Cinque Terre 5 Hip, New Rome Hotel 6 Summer Flights from JFK 6 d r a o B Don’t Forget the Plate! 7 m s i r u o T t n e m n r e v o G n a i l a t I Vernazza Sounds of the Past at THE ABBEY OF ANT’ NTIMO dream of S tep insideA the basilica of Abbazia di Sant’ Antimo and it’s S easy to imagine you’ve just walked into the pages of an Umberto Eco novel. Several times a day, the abbey’s small commune of monks assembles here to chant the Gregorian melodies of their medieval predeces- IVolume T4, Issue 2 ALwww.dreamofitaly.com YMarch 2005 sors. Their voices resonate hauntingly beneath the basilica’s vaulted ceiling, mingling with the less harmonious echoes of visitors’ footsteps across the ancient stone floor and the occasional whisper amplified by the basilica’s Paradise Found: Hiking near-perfect acoustics. It’s a sublime juxtaposition of modern and medieval ockythe coves, fallaway Cinque cliffs and yellow stuccoT errerise in tiers among that began over 1200 years ago… Apennine ridges are the back- church towers, castles and pocket-sized Rdrop to the Cinque Terre — five piazzas swirled with café tables. According to legend, this is the site fishing and wine-making villages Fishermen rowing wooden gozzi cast where Charlemagne and his troops perched at improbable angles along a their nets near spurs where sunbathers were struck by the plague while 10-mile stretch of Italy’s bask.
    [Show full text]
  • Working with Perugino: the Technique of an Annunciation Attributed to Giannicola Di Paolo
    NATIONAL GALLERY TECHNICAL BULLETIN RENAISSANCE SIENA AND PERUGIA 1490–1510 VOLUME 27 National Gallery Company London Distributed by Yale University Press This volume of the Technical Bulletin has been funded by the American Friends of the National Gallery, London with a generous donation from Mrs Charles Wrightsman. ‘The Master of the Story of Griselda and Paintings for Sienese Palaces’ is published with the additional generous support of The Samuel H. Kress Foundation. Series editor Ashok Roy Photographic credits All photographs reproduced in this Bulletin are © The National Gallery, London, unless credited otherwise below. © National Gallery Company Limited 2006 BALTIMORE MD.Walters Art Gallery: p. 23, pl. 25; p. 51, pl. 70; p. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be 53, pl. 74; p. 56, pl. 77. transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or BLOOMINGTON IN. Indiana University mechanical, including photocopy, recording, or any Art Museum. Photo Michael Cavanagh and Kevin Montague: p. 22, information storage and retrieval system, without the pl. 23; p. 54, pls. 75, 76; p. 55, figs. 38, 39. BORDEAUX. Musée des prior permission in writing of the publisher. Beaux-Arts, photo Lysiane Gauthier: p. 106, pl. 9. BUDAPEST. Szépmüvészéti Muzeum. Photo: András Rázsó: p. 21, pl. 22; p. 57, pl. 2006 First published in Great Britain in by 78; p. 59, pl. 82. FANO. Chiesa di Santa Maria Nuova © 1997. Photo National Gallery Company Limited Scala, Florence: p. 102, pl. 5. FLORENCE. Galleria dell’ Accademia. St Vincent House, 30 Orange Street Courtesy of the Opificio delle Pietre Dure e Laboratori di Restauro, London wc2h 7hh Florence: p.
    [Show full text]