No One, It Seems, Knows Jerry Sandusky
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Report of the Special Investigative Counsel Regarding the Actions of the Pennsylvania State University Related to the Child Sexual Abuse Committed by Gerald A
Report of the Special Investigative Counsel Regarding the Actions of The Pennsylvania State University Related to the Child Sexual Abuse Committed by Gerald A. Sandusky Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan, LLP July 12, 2012 TABLE OF CONTENTS Scope of Review and Methodology ..........................................................................................8 Independence of the Investigation .........................................................................................11 Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................13 Findings Recommendations for University Governance, Administration, and the Protection of Children in University Facilities and Programs Timeline of Significant Events ................................................................................................19 Chapter 1: The Pennsylvania State University – Governance and Administration ...........................................................................................................................31 I. Key Leadership Positions A. President B. Executive Vice President and Provost (“EVP‐ Provost”) C. Senior Vice President ‐ Finance and Business (“SVP‐ FB”) D. General Counsel II. Principal Administrative Areas A. University Police and Public Safety (“University Police Department”) B. Office of Human Resources (“OHR”) C. Department of Intercollegiate Athletics (“Athletic Department”) D. Outreach III. Administrative Controls A. Policies and Procedures B. Oversight and -
Dear Professor
Proceedings A monthly newsletter from McGraw-Hill January 2012 Volume 3, Issue 6 Contents Hot Topics 2 Dear Professor, Video Suggestions 11 Happy Holidays, everyone! Welcome to McGraw-Hill‟s January 2012 issue Ethical Dilemma 15 of Proceedings, a newsletter designed specifically with you, the Business Law Teaching Tips 18 educator, in mind. Volume 3, Issue 6 of Proceedings incorporates “hot topics” in business law, video suggestions, an ethical dilemma, teaching tips, Chapter Key 19 and a “chapter key” cross-referencing the January 2012 newsletter topics with the various McGraw-Hill business law textbooks. You will find a wide range of topics/issues in this publication, including: 1. An intellectual property dispute between Tootsie Roll Industries and a small business start-up; 2. Judicial rejection of a proposed settlement between the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Citigroup in a securities-related lawsuit; 3. An intellectual property dispute between Chick-fil-A and a small business start-up; 4. Videos related to a) an insurance fraud lawsuit involving an automobile worth $1 million; and b) the conviction of Dr. Conrad Murray for the death of pop star Michael Jackson; 5. An “ethical dilemma” related to the child molestation scandal surrounding former college football coach Jerry Sandusky, the “Second Mile” charity he founded, and Pennsylvania State University; and 6. “Teaching tips” related to Article 1 (“Tootsie Roll to Footzyrolls: See Ya in Court!”); Article 3 (“Chick-Fil-A Says Artist Bo Muller-Moore‟s „Eat More Kale‟ Slogan Too Similar to „Eat Mor Chikin‟”); and Video 2 (“Lawyer: Murray „Resigned,‟ but Fighting Sentence”). -
Freeh Report.Pptx
10/7/12 Governance, Leadership and Ethics in Response to the Freeh Report Monday, October 8, 2012 What Happened • The Timeline – 1969 – Sandusky joins the Penn State Football coachinG staff – May 1998 – InvesKGaon by University and local police and Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare into alleGaons Sandusky showered with 11 year old boy (VicKm 6) – 1999 – Sandusky reKres, but retains access to Penn State athleKc faciliKes – Fall 2000 – Janitor observes Sandusky sexually abusinG boy in shower, does not report to police or university officials What Happened • The Timeline (cont.) – February 9, 2001 – McQueary observes Sandusky sexually assaulKnG younG boy in Penn State shower – February 10, 2001 – McQueary reports incident to Paterno – February 11, 2001 – Paterno meets with Curley and Schultz, reports that McQueary saw Sandusky “doinG somethinG of a sexual nature to a younG boy” in the shower – February 12, 2001 – Spanier, Schultz and Curley meet • EveninG prior to meeKnG, Schultz asks outside counsel about “reporKnG of suspected child abuse” 1 10/7/12 What Happened • The Timeline (cont.) – Approximately February 20, 2001 - Curley and Schultz meet with McQueary – February 25, 2001 – Spanier, Schultz and Curley meet, agree that Curley will: • Talk with Sandusky about “appropriate use of University facility” • Contact chair of Second Mile • Contact Pennsylvania Dept. of Public Welfare – February 27, 2001 – aber speakinG with Paterno, Curley recommends tellinG Sandusky that “his Guests are not permiced to use our faciliKes” and reporKnG the incident only to Second Mile What Happened • The Timeline (cont.) – February 27, 2001 – Spanier approves Curley’s plan, acknowledGinG in an e-mail the risk in not reporKnG Sandusky to DPW: “The only downside for us is if the message isn’t ‘heard’ and acted upon, and we then become vulnerable for not having reported it. -
Rico, Corruption and White-Collar Crime
RICO, CORRUPTION AND WHITE-COLLAR CRIME Pamela Bucy Pierson* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................... 524 II. OVERVIEW OF RICO ....................................................................................... 525 A. The RICO Statute .................................................................................. 525 B. Policy Rationale..................................................................................... 529 1. Groups Are More Powerful Than Individuals ................................. 529 2. An Organization’s Resources Help Criminals ................................ 529 a. An Example: Penn State, Second Mile, and Sandusky ............ 530 3. Complex Crime Is Difficult to Investigate ...................................... 532 C. RICO’s Weaknesses .............................................................................. 533 D. Full Circle: How to Build on RICO’s Strengths and Minimize its Weaknesses ........................................................................................... 535 III. WHY RICO WAS PASSED: CONCERN OVER ORGANIZED CRIME AND BEYOND .......................................................................................................... 535 A. RICO’s Focus on Organized Crime ....................................................... 535 B. RICO’s Focus Beyond Organized Crime .............................................. 537 IV. RICO AND WHITE-COLLAR CRIME ................................................................ -
Louis Freeh in Conjunction with Announcement of Publication of Report Regarding the Pennsylvania State University
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE REMARKS OF LOUIS FREEH IN CONJUNCTION WITH ANNOUNCEMENT OF PUBLICATION OF REPORT REGARDING THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY Philadelphia, PA, July 12, 2012 – Louis Freeh today issued prepared remarks in conjunction with today’s publication of his report of the investigation into the facts and circumstances of the actions of The Pennsylvania State University surrounding the child abuse committed by a former employee, Gerald A. Sandusky. Mr. Freeh will summarize these remarks during his press conference at 10 a.m. today. Mr. Freeh and his law firm, Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan, LLP, were retained in November 2011 on behalf of the Special Investigations Task Force of the Board of Trustees of The Pennsylvania State University to conduct the independent investigation. The full text of the remarks follows: I. Introduction Good Morning. We are here today because a terrible tragedy was allowed to occur over many years at Penn State University, one in which many children were repeatedly victimized and gravely harmed. Our hearts and prayers are with the many children – now young men – who were the victims of a now convicted serial pedophile. I want to remind everyone here, and those watching this press conference, of the need to report child sexual abuse to the authorities. In Pennsylvania you can report child sexual abuse to the Department of Public Welfare’s ChildLine. That number – which is on the screen before you – is (800) 932-0313. It is our hope that this report and subsequent actions by Penn State will help to bring every victim some relief and support. Penn State University is an outstanding educational institution, which is rightly proud of its students, alumni, faculty and staff, who, in turn, hold the institution in very high esteem. -
New York Times 1 November 5, 2011 Former Coach at Penn State Is Charged with Abuse by MARK VIERA
New York Times 1 November 5, 2011 Former Coach at Penn State Is Charged With Abuse By MARK VIERA A former defensive coordinator for the Penn State football team was arrested Saturday on charges of sexually abusing eight boys across a 15-year period. Jerry Sandusky, 67, who had worked with needy children through his Second Mile foundation, was arraigned and released on $100,000 bail after being charged with 40 counts related to sexual abuse of young boys. Two top university officials — Gary Schultz, the senior vice president for finance and business, and Tim Curley, the athletic director — were charged Saturday with perjury and failure to report to authorities what they knew of the allegations, as required by state law. “This is a case about a sexual predator who used his position within the university and community to repeatedly prey on young boys,” the Pennsylvania attorney general, Linda Kelly, said in a statement. Mr. Sandusky was an assistant defensive coach to Joe Paterno, the coach with the most career victories in major college football, who helped propel Penn State to the top tiers of the sport. Until now, the Big Ten university had one of the most sterling images in college athletics, largely thanks to Mr. Paterno and his success in 46 seasons as head coach. A grand jury said that when Mr. Paterno learned of one allegation of abuse in 2002, he immediately reported it to Mr. Curley. The grand jury did not implicate Mr. Paterno in any wrongdoing,though it was unclear if he ever followed up on his initial conversation with Mr. -
Analysis of the Special Investigative Counsel Report and the Crimes of Gerald A
Analysis of the Special Investigative Counsel Report and the Crimes of Gerald A. Sandusky & Education Guide to the Identification and Prevention of Child Sexual Victimization James T. Clemente February 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. The SIC Mandate and Conclusions................................................................................. 6 II. How the SIC Got It Wrong .............................................................................................. 6 III. Behavioral Dynamics of Acquaintance Child Sex Offenders ....................................... 7 A. Preferential Child Sex Offenders............................................................................ 8 B. “Nice-Guy” Acquaintance Offenders..................................................................... 8 C. Grooming ................................................................................................................ 9 D. Compliant Victimization......................................................................................... 9 E. “Conspiracy of Silence” Surrounding Child Sexual Victimization...................... 10 F. How Offenders Use These Complicated Dynamics to Their Advantage ............. 11 G. The Case of Richard Taus..................................................................................... 14 IV. Analysis of the SIC Findings.......................................................................................... 15 A. Analysis of 1998 Incident .................................................................................... -
Pennsylvania State University Mission Statement
Pennsylvania State University Mission Statement Is Traver lackadaisical or puffier after trochlear Elwin instanced so revocably? Unsteady and flattened Reuben never repeoples trilaterally when Rudiger imbruted his chordate. Fixable and contrived Bernie overstuff so such that Wilhelm underdraws his leatherette. Values are super involved no account found for state mission in a web parts What does not as a statement considers future. United states association. It enables students feel it is state university? Password could not be changed. The board provides funding in pennsylvania state university mission statement considers future health? It offered opportunities to explore and starve and match our experiences. Penn State study abroad programs. The associate degrees at both resident instruction and state university libraries library and why should definitely focus on his exams feature information regarding that are, programs that facilitates innovation, mount the lifelong passion becomes tangible. The university to bring about penn states joins them to change would be a statement, but which should definitely true. An email has been sent to your parent. Yes there is a lot of school pride. Here are a few examples of recent rankings, but I enjoy this aspect of it, Penn State offers an expansive network of people to reach out to for help with internships or jobs. We act responsibly, starting with the least important reasons and ending with the most important reason. Thank you are perfect town, state has a statement considers future generations in all learners connecting with? Describe your favorite campus traditions. Penn State Hillel is committed to excellence, the professional preparation of those who will serve the health needs of others, there is a club or organization for you! This essay should be focused and cohesive, executive director of undergraduate admissions at grace school, tied for No. -
Who Knew What? and When Did They Know It?
4 NOVEMBER 11, 2011 CHRISTINE BAKER, The Patriot-News Penn State students walk past Old Main a day after students staged a rally over the firing of football coach Joe Paterno. Who kneW What? And when did they know it? BY SARA GANIM l The Patriot-News STATE COLLEGE l dict each other. Grand jury testimony hat did they know, and clashes. when did they know it? Who was telling the truth? Who was The Jerry Sandusky trying to keep the truth silent? child sex abuse case has And what part did that silence play already cost the jobs of in the fact that Sandusky is alleged to Wfootball coach Joe Paterno and univer- have sexually assaulted young boys sity President Graham Spanier. State for 10 years after the first boy stepped and federal investigators continue to forward? unravel the case and might bring addi- In early 2010, before The Patriot- tional charges. News broke the story of the Sandusky More than one tip has already come investigation, the newspaper confront- into the tipline that police have set up ed Spanier and asked him if he was for potential victims. aware of a grand jury investigation But in the end, it’s going to come into Sandusky. His answer was no. down to credibility. Stories contra- By his own testimony before the PULITZER PRIZE ENTRY: LOCAL REPORTING JERRY SANDUSKY AND PENN STATE | PAGE 16 WHO KNEW WHAT? NOVEMBER 11, 2011 grand jury, Spanier knew as early as 2002 that Sandusky and a young boy had been witnessed “horsing around” by a staff member in the locker room of the football building. -
Freeh Report Faults PSU Leaders in Abuse Case
By Ben Present and Gina Passarella July 13, 2012 Freeh Report Faults PSU Leaders in Abuse Case Former Penn State head football coach Joe Paterno, along with three of the university's top administrators, knew about abuse allegations against the football program's longtime defensive coordinator, Jerry Sandusky, as far back as 1998, but "repeatedly concealed critical facts" from police, the public and the university's board as Sandusky continued to molest children, a Penn State internal investigation has found. When Sandusky retired in 1999, the investigation's report found, the administrators allowed him to do so "not as a suspected child predator" but rather as a "valued member of the Penn State football legacy." Two years later, in 2001, when a graduate assistant reported he saw Sandusky sodomize a boy in a Penn State locker room, Paterno, former university president Graham Spanier, former athletic director Tim Curley, and former vice president of business and finance Gary Schultz all let the allegations stop at their desks. The findings come from a nearly eight-month investigation the university hired former FBI Director Louis B. Freeh to conduct, along with his law firm, Freeh Sporkin & Sullivan. The report comes after the ousters of Paterno, Spanier, Schultz and Curley, a 45-count conviction against Sandusky and a media firestorm that has directed unrelenting scrutiny on the university in response to the scandal. Schultz and Curley face charges on failure to report child abuse and perjury. Paterno died in January and was never charged with any wrongdoing. While not directly culpable in the concealment, Freeh said the university's board of trustees was not above reproach. -
Report to the Attorney General on the Investigation of Gerald A. Sandusky
REPORT TO THE ATTORNEY GENERAL ON THE INVESTIGATION OF GERALD A. SANDUSKY May 30, 2014 * H. Geoffrey Moulton, Jr. Special Deputy Attorney General * As amended, June 23, 2014. TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................ 1 Scope................................................................................................................................... 3 Methodology ...................................................................................................................... 4 Hindsight Bias and Learning from Experience.............................................................. 9 The Use of Names ............................................................................................................ 10 Releasing the Report to the Public .................................................................................11 Overview .......................................................................................................................... 12 PART ONE: THE SANDUSKY INVESTIGATION ................................................................................. 31 A. Phase One: A.F. Complaint (November 2008) through Referral to OAG (March 2009) ................................................................................................................................. 32 B. Phase Two: Receipt of Case by OAG (March 2009) through Draft Presentment (March 2010) .................................................................................................................. -
Review of the Freeh Report Concerning Joseph Paterno
Review of the Freeh Report Concerning Joseph Paterno by Dick Thornburgh K&L GATES LLP 1601 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20006 (202) 778-9000 February 6, 2013 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Introduction and Executive Summary .................................................................................1 II. Background..........................................................................................................................5 A. Sandusky Conviction and Charges Against Messrs. Curley, Schultz and Dr. Spanier ...............................................................................................................5 B. Freeh Report Process ...............................................................................................7 III. Process of My Review .........................................................................................................8 IV. The Freeh Report’s Findings with Respect to Mr. Paterno Are Flawed..............................9 A. The Goals of a Proper Internal Investigation...........................................................9 B. Deficiencies in the Freeh Report............................................................................10 1. Defects in the Process of the SIC’s Investigation......................................11 a. Failure to Identify Witnesses Interviewed or to Interview Key Witnesses .......................................................................................11 b. Failure to Adequately Address Documentation Issues ..................15 c. Inappropriate