This article appeared in a journal published by Elsevier. The attached copy is furnished to the author for internal non-commercial research and education use, including for instruction at the authors institution and sharing with colleagues. Other uses, including reproduction and distribution, or selling or licensing copies, or posting to personal, institutional or third party websites are prohibited. In most cases authors are permitted to post their version of the article (e.g. in Word or Tex form) to their personal website or institutional repository. Authors requiring further information regarding Elsevier’s archiving and manuscript policies are encouraged to visit: http://www.elsevier.com/copyright Author's personal copy
Planetary and Space Science 59 (2011) 1143–1165
Contents lists available at ScienceDirect
Planetary and Space Science
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/pss
Mars: The evolutionary history of the northern lowlands based on crater counting and geologic mapping à S.C. Werner a, , K.L. Tanaka b, J.A. Skinner Jr.b a Physics of Geological Processes, University of Oslo, Norway b Astrogeology Science Center, U.S. Geological Survey, Flagstaff, Arizona, USA article info abstract
Article history: The geologic history of planetary surfaces is most effectively determined by joining geologic mapping Received 15 April 2010 and crater counting which provides an iterative, qualitative and quantitative method for defining Received in revised form relative ages and absolute model ages. Based on this approach, we present spatial and temporal details 18 February 2011 regarding the evolution of the Martian northern plains and surrounding regions. Accepted 29 March 2011 The highland–lowland boundary (HLB) formed during the pre-Noachian and was subsequently Available online 9 April 2011 modified through various processes. The Nepenthes Mensae unit along the northern margins of the Keywords: cratered highlands, was formed by HLB scarp-erosion, deposition of sedimentary and volcanic Mars materials, and dissection by surface runoff between 3.81 and 3.65 Ga. Ages for giant polygons in Geologic evolution Utopia and Acidalia Planitiae are 3.75 Ga and likely reflect the age of buried basement rocks. These Lowlands buried lowland surfaces are comparable in age to those located closer to the HLB, where a much Crater statistics Paleao-ocean thinner, post-HLB deposit is mapped. The emplacement of the most extensive lowland surfaces ended between 3.75 and 3.4 Ga, based on densities of craters generally 43 km in diameter. Results from the polygonal terrain support the existence of a major lowland depocenter shortly after the pre-Noachian formation of the northern lowlands. In general, northern plains surfaces show gradually younger ages at lower elevations, consistent local to regional unit emplacement and resurfacing between 3.6 and 2.6 Ga. Elevation levels and morphology are not necessarily related, and variations in ages within the mapped units are found, especially in units formed and modified by multiple geological processes. Regardless, most of the youngest units in the northern lowlands are considered to be lavas, polar ice, or thick mantle deposits, arguing against the ocean theory during the Amazonian Period (younger than about 3.15 Ga). All ages measured in the closest vicinity of the steep dichotomy escarpment are also 3.7 Ga or older. The formation ages of volcanic flanks at the HLB (e.g., Alba Mons (3.6–3.4 Ga) and the last fan at Apollinaris Mons, 3.71 Ga) may give additional temporal constraint for the possible existence of any kind of Martian ocean before about 3.7 Ga. It seems to reflect the termination of a large-scale, precipitation-based hydrological cycle and major geologic processes related to such cycling. & 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction northern and the southern hemispheres of about 5 km (e.g., Smith et al., 1998). In the eastern hemisphere along Terrae Sabaea and One of the dominating features of the Martian physiography is Cimmeria, the dichotomy boundary is characterized by a promi- its division into heavily cratered highlands, which occupy the nent scarp and possible extensional and contractional features southern hemisphere, and mostly featureless low-lying plains, (Watters, 2003), while other parts in the western hemisphere which occupy the northern hemisphere. The lowland region, along Arabia and Tempe Terrae have mainly gentle slopes. roughly centered on the north pole, covers one-third of the planet Tharsis, one of the large volcanic provinces, and the possible and is broadly characterized by a smooth, gently sloping surface volcanically formed Medusae Fossae formation partially bury the (at kilometer-scale) (Kreslavsky and Head, 2002), with elevations dichotomy escarpment, and several large impact basins appear to below the mean planetary radius (e.g., Smith et al., 1999). have contributed to its current exposure. Various formation Topography data reveal a difference in elevation between the mechanisms have been suggested for the northern plains basin; for example, its origin has been attributed to tectonism driven by mantle dynamics (e.g., Wise et al., 1979; McGill and Dimitriou, Ã Corresponding author. Tel.: þ47 22856472. 1990; Sleep, 1994; Zhong and Zuber, 2001; Zuber, 2001)ortoimpact E-mail address: [email protected] (S.C. Werner). cratering (e.g., Wilhelms and Squyres, 1984; Frey and Schultz, 1988;
0032-0633/$ - see front matter & 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. doi:10.1016/j.pss.2011.03.022 Author's personal copy
1144 S.C. Werner et al. / Planetary and Space Science 59 (2011) 1143–1165
McGill, 1989; Marinova et al., 2008; Nimmo et al., 2008; Andrews- affecting smaller diameter craters); and (3) the exclusion of Hanna et al., 2008). However, any clear morphologic evidence has highly degraded craters in the crater catalog, so that only been obscured by resurfacing events. Gravity signatures indicate the relatively pristine craters with preserved ejecta blankets were Martian crust thins northward in the vicinity of the highland– included (these were interpreted to superpose and thus postdate lowland boundary (Janle, 1983; Zuber et al., 2000). Crustal magnetic the unit). anomalies are generally stronger in the highlands compared to the By investigating the full cratering record using the crater size- lowlands, indicating that the Martian dynamo had ceased prior to (or frequency distribution, it is not necessary to exclude or pre-sort perhaps as a consequence of) the formation of the northern plains crater populations. Significant resurfacing will be visible as devia- (Connerney et al., 2001). tions from the fitted crater curve in cumulative crater plots and Prior to Mars Global Surveyor (MGS; Orbital insertion date: 11 different events of sufficient magnitude can be separated (Werner, September 1997. Launch date: 7 November 1996), mapping and 2009). Northern plains surfaces reflect complex resurfacing his- stratigraphic analysis of Mars’ global geology was largely based tories, which may relate to a variety of processes occurring at a on Viking Orbiter image data (Scott and Tanaka, 1986; Greeley range of rates and temporal overlap. These complexities make the and Guest, 1987; Tanaka and Scott, 1987). However, a clearer northern plains favorable for detailed analysis through the com- understanding of the physiographic characteristics and geologic bination of map- and crater-based stratigraphic interpretations. evolution of the northern lowlands was afforded by topographic Here, we present a sample of crater size-frequency distribu- data of the Mars Orbiter Laser Altimeter (MOLA) and additional tions for representative localities of major geologic units of the image data of the Mars Orbiter Camera (MOC), both onboard northern plains. In combination with geologic map relations, we MGS. In particular, Tanaka et al. (2003, 2005) used these datasets discuss the evolution of the northern lowlands and surrounding to significantly revise the boundaries and ages of geological units terrains that is implied by these counts. The main focus in the first in the northern plains. The main definition of the new lowland part of the study is to detail the modeled ages for major episodes units was guided by the demarcation between predominantly of geologic activity within the lowlands, based on key areas guided Noachian (4 3.7 Ga) densely cratered materials that characterize by the most recent geological mapping (Tanaka et al., 2005). In the the equatorial and southern highlands of Mars and the younger, second part of the paper, we present detailed properties of the mostly plains-forming materials that typically lie below an lowlands’ crater size-frequency distributions observed in Utopia elevation of 2000 m. Major geographical features include the Planitia and giant polygonal terrain of Utopia and Acidalia Plani- Borealis, Utopia, and Isidis basins, which are largely defined, tiae. We discuss these regional observations in the context of the respectively, by the Vastitas Borealis, Utopia Planitia, and Isidis northern plains geologic record, with specific focus on the exis- Planitia plains regions. All geologic units and structures that occur tence of a postulated Oceanus Borealis (Baker et al., 1991). within the boundaries of these lowland topographic basins are distinctive because of their separated geologic evolution since early in Mars’ evolution. As such, these became repositories of 2. Absolute ages in resurfaced units—method regional sequences of materials marked by a unique assemblage and uncertainties of landforms. The post-Viking geological map of the northern plains (Tanaka Remote-sensing based delineation of geological units by rela- et al., 2005) resulted in two new definitions applied to the global tive age, following morphologic or spectral characteristics, relies stratigraphic scheme of Tanaka (1986). First, the pre-Noachian on superposition principles and other stratigraphic relations period was defined as the age of primordial crustal rocks under- among surface units and features (e.g., Hansen, 2000; Tanaka lying and predating but incorporated as fragments within Early et al., 2005). However, these are largely qualitative assessments Noachian outcrops. The northern plains depression and Utopia and do not provide information on absolute age. Because of the basin within it are topographic features that apparently formed local variability in crater densities, separated outcrops of equiva- during the pre-Noachian as no outcrops of materials predating the lent units generally cannot provide consistent ages relative to one features are evident. The second major change was a refinement another. For many planetary surfaces, the relative abundances of the Hesperian/Amazonian boundary (3.15 Ga) as the surface (and size-frequency distribution) of impact craters distinguish age of Vastitas Borealis marginal and interior units. This mod- outcrops of geological units quantitatively by relative age. Deter- ification from previous geological map depictions of the Vastitas mination of a surface’s geologic history most effectively depends Borealis units continues to provide a basis for subdividing on not only geologic mapping, which delineates materials by primary (depositional) and secondary (modificational) geologic surface and natural breaks in the rock sequence, but also crater processes within the Martian northern plains. counting, which provides a quantitative tool for defining relative The time-stratigraphic classification of the northern plains ages and modeling absolute ages (e.g., Tanaka, 1986; Hartmann geologic units of Tanaka et al. (2005) is based mainly on super- and Neukum, 2001). Although a combination of these two position relations among the geologic units as well as the overall approaches is optimal, the application of crater-based ages is density of craters larger than 5 km in diameter for each unit inherently more complex and, thus, requires more knowledge of (NcumðDZ5kmÞ) from the crater catalog published by Barlow and adherence to theory, method, and procedure. (1988, 2001) and the NcumðDZ5kmÞ epoch boundary values given The theoretical concept and mathematical background of age- by Tanaka (1986). Tanaka et al. (2003) discussed the relevance of dating techniques based on crater counts was developed in the these crater frequencies with respect to their correctness and 1960s and 1970s and summarized by the Crater Analysis Techni- stated three problems with their approach: (1) the misregistra- ques Working Group (Arvidson et al., 1979). Absolute ages on tion between the topographically based geological maps and the Mars and other solid surface objects are determined by a crater Viking image-based crater catalog, which might attribute craters production function and an applied cratering chronology model. to a unit to which they do not belong or vice versa, affecting The crater production function describes the expected crater size- smaller units the most; (2) taking the cumulative number for frequency distribution recorded in a geological unit at a specific a single reference diameter (here 5 km and larger) instead of time, and is, when scaled, comparable between planetary bodies the entire crater size-frequency distribution, which inherently such as the Moon and Mars (e.g., Neukum and Wise, 1976; obscures the ability to discern resurfacing event(s) within the Neukum and Ivanov, 1994; Ivanov, 2001). The transfer of crater- crater population, particularly of small vertical scale (i.e., those based functions from the Moon to Mars requires the knowledge of Author's personal copy
S.C. Werner et al. / Planetary and Space Science 59 (2011) 1143–1165 1145 the impacting body flux ratio between the lunar case to Mars, removes or obscures the cratering record starting at the smaller with consideration of celestial mechanics and how the conditions size range. Alternatively, resurfacing can altogether reset the of crater formation differ from one planet to another. The latter cratering record in instances where the surface is completely conditions are mainly defined by the respective gravity and target renewed. In either case, the determination of a resurfacing event properties of the impacted bodies (Ivanov, 2001). based on crater density is dependent on the event’s magnitude. The transfer of relative into absolute ages by the use of a A distinct drop in the crater size-frequency distribution of a chronology model is based on the assumptions that (1) the crater resurfaced geologic unit signifies a resurfacing event (Fig. 1AorB); production function—the original size-frequency distribution—is multiple episodes of resurfacing can be implied by multiple drops in accurately known (Ivanov, 2001, originally in Neukum et al., the distribution. In cases of ongoing resurfacing (e.g., on steep slopes 1975), (2) the flux of projectiles onto the surfaces is isotropic, of Martian surface structures) or saturation, the crater size-fre- and (3) any target-property variations are negligible. With these quency distribution continually crosses isochrons and cannot be assumptions, the crater densities measured on planetary surfaces linked to a discrete age (Fig. 1C). that have been exposed for the same amount of time with respect For units where resurfacing has been observed the determina- to diameter are equivalent in age. Relative ages based on Ncum ðD,tÞ tion of ages has to be limited to a certain diameter range (below are given for a fixed diameter D (e. g., 1, 2, 5, 16 km); these are or above a diameter d% , where the resurfacing has influenced the commonly referred to as crater-retention ages (Hartmann, 1966). crater size-frequency distribution). The oldest age is derived The crater chronology model applied herein is based on straightforwardly, by fitting the production function to the measurements of the crater size-frequency distribution on areas large-diameter range. For the resurfacing event, if no correction of the Moon, which are linked to radiometric ages retrieved from has been applied, the age is overestimated (dependent on the lunar rocks sampled and returned during the Apollo missions. magnitude of the resurfacing event) due to the cumulative This distribution is transferable to other (inner solar system) character of the crater size-frequency distribution. This problem planets and solid surface bodies, assuming that all bodies under- is avoided in incremental distribution plots (Arvidson et al., 1979, went the same bombardment (e.g., Neukum and Wise, 1976; and customarily used by W. K. Hartmann). Neukum and Hiller, 1981; Hartmann, 1973, 1977, 1978; and The general description of the cumulative crater size-fre- unified in Hartmann and Neukum, 2001). quency distribution Ncum ðD,tÞ is given by the cumulative number Three phenomena—saturation, contamination by secondary of craters per area for a given diameter D at a certain time t: — Z Z cratering, and geological resurfacing have the potential to cause 1 t 0 0 0 0 deviation from the crater production function. In densely cratered NcumðD,tÞ¼ gðD Þ dD f ðt Þ dt ð1Þ (i.e., old) units, the rate of production and destruction eventually D 0 becomes steady, starting at small diameters. Such an equilibrium for an undisturbed geological unit (Fig. 2A) a simple solution can distribution exhibits a characteristic cumulative slope on a power- be found law fit of b¼ 2 at the small crater range (e.g., Woronow, 1977; NcumðD,tÞ¼GðDÞ FðtÞ, ð2Þ Richardson, 2009). If measurements are contaminated by second- ary craters, the observed crater size-frequency distribution may where G represents the cumulative crater size-frequency distri- appear steeper than the crater production function suggests (e.g., bution and F the flux of projectiles. It is required that the crater Shoemaker, 1965). Other deviation from the crater production size-frequency distribution is stable over time, and only the flux function typically implies a resurfacing event (erosion or deposi- changes (decays, e.g., Hartmann and Neukum, 2001). tion). Although separation of different surface units might some- In a unit where subsequent processes (erosion and deposition) times not be possible due to limited image resolution or lack of occurred, the smaller crater population has been modified pre- stratigraphic contrasts, effects of geologic resurfacing are detect- ferentially (compare Fig. 2A and B). Subsequently, the surface able in the crater size-frequency distribution (as long as there are accumulates craters as if it is a fresh surface (Fig. 2C). On a statistically sufficient crater populations). In such cases, the age of planetary surface, a proper remote-sensing method to distinguish the resurfacing event can be estimated because it effectively both populations is not known (compare Fig. 2C and D). An
] Single Resurfacing Multiple Resurfacing Continual Resurfacing -2 Cum. Crater Frequency N(D> 1km) [km Frequency Crater Cum.
Crater Diameter D [km]
Fig. 1. Three different schematic crater size-frequency distributions show resurfacing events which have (A) a distinct timing visible in the re-steepening of the crater size- frequency distribution at smaller sizes, (B) is followed by a second distinct event, and (C) is occurring continuously. At the smallest crater range a flattening of the curve is observed which is related only to the resolution limit of the image data. Author's personal copy
1146 S.C. Werner et al. / Planetary and Space Science 59 (2011) 1143–1165
] 3.3 Ga 2.2 Ga -2 3.7 Ga 3.3 Ga 3.7 Ga
2.17 Ga
3.70 Ga Cum. Cra Cum. equency N (D> 1km) [km
Crater Diameter D [km] Crater Diameter D [km]
Fig. 2. Schematic description of a (A) cratered surface, (B) the same surface affected by erosion erasing craters of smaller diameters, (C) the same surface after continued cratering. In reality the surface would look as shown in (D), where the old and younger population cannot be distinguished (stippled and solid lines in C). (E) depicts the resulting crater size-frequency distribution plotted with isochrons, and (F) shows the same crater size-frequency distribution but also the smaller range crater size- frequency distribution corrected for the resurfacing event. This results in a reduced age for the resurfacing event compared to the uncorrected one.
example of a measured resurfacing crater size-frequency distri- (Ncum—value of an individual diameter bin) is not taken, but rather bution is given in Fig. 2E. Any attempts to distinguish between the best representing crater-production function (Ivanov, 2001)of erosional state or other parameters of the craters can be strongly the observed crater size-frequency measurements. The fitting misleading (and are subjective). To understand the crater popula- procedure follows the Marquardt–Levenberg algorithm, a weighted tion accumulated on the surface after the resurfacing event, a non-linear least-squarespffiffiffiffi fit (Levenberg, 1944; Marquardt, 1963). method is needed to separate both populations. A first approach is The statistical error ( N) of the measurement indicates the described by Werner (2005, 2009), which was later adopted by uncertainties of the relative ages and the fit quality depends on Michael and Neukum (2010) using a different numerical imple- the number of bins which can be used as fit range. The uncertainty mentation. An iterative treatment is necessary to determine the of such a fit for making use of the whole size range for the age(s) of resurfacing event(s) by fitting the well-known crater derivation of a mean N-value at a certain diameter is of the order production function to the crater-size range below a certain of the statistical error of 2s and less than the individual bin error of diameter to restore the full crater size-frequency distribution of 1s. The level of uncertainty of the scaled cumulative number N per the resurfacing event and the age of the younger surface (Fig. 2F). bin is given by In cases where additional resurfacing processes took place, the N1=2 correction has to be repeated at the next cut-off diameter. 7s ¼ 7 ð3Þ N A Prerequisites for the crater count statistics are (1) careful geologic mapping in order to delineate homogeneous, temporally for each bin. Here, the reliability of the ages is improved by unique units, and (2) exclusion of sublimation pits, volcanic and statistical measures if a larger area and/or a larger number of secondary craters, and other non-primary impact craters to the craters is counted. The fitted crater frequencies given for a extent possible. Contamination due to unrecognized global sec- reference diameter are translated to absolute ages by applying a ondary craters unwittingly included in the measurements is less cratering chronology model. In the course of this work the than 10% (old surfaces), and in most cases less than 5% (Werner, reference diameter is Ncum ¼ DðZ1kmÞ. 2005; Werner et al., 2009). For Mars, the applied chronology model is transferred from the For determination of initially relative ages and subsequently Moon (Hartmann and Neukum, 2001; Ivanov, 2001). A variety of absolute ages, the cumulative number at a certain diameter lunar cratering chronology models existed previously and agreed Author's personal copy
S.C. Werner et al. / Planetary and Space Science 59 (2011) 1143–1165 1147 within a factor of 2–3. These different models have converged to a terrain characterizing most of the highland surface. The unified model (Hartmann and Neukum, 2001; Ivanov, 2001). The Nepenthes Mensae unit consists of knobs and mesas of highland cratering chronology used in this paper is given by rock and interposed slope and plains material, which forms much