DOCSLIB.ORG

Selected Documents on the 1948 Palestine War Author(S): Walid Khalidi Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Selected Documents on the 1948 Palestine War Author(S): Walid Khalidi Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol Selected Documents on the 1948 Palestine War Author(s): Walid Khalidi Source: Journal of Palestine Studies, Vol. 27, No. 3 (Spring, 1998), pp. 60-105 Published by: University of California Press on behalf of the Institute for Palestine Studies Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2537835 Accessed: 24-07-2015 20:24 UTC Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/ info/about/policies/terms.jsp JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. University of California Press and Institute for Palestine Studies are collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Palestine Studies. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 66.134.128.11 on Fri, 24 Jul 2015 20:24:50 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SELECTED DOCUMENTS ON THE 1948 PALESTINE WAR SELECTED AND ANNOTATED BY WALID KHALIDI The 1948 PalestineWar, whose fiftiethanniversary occurs thisyear, fell into two major phases: the first,the civilwar phase, began soon afterthe UnitedNational General Assembly(UNGA) partitionresolution of 29 November 1947 and lasted until15 May 1948,the formalend of the BritishMandate. The second, the regular war phase, lasted from15 May (when the Stateof Israel was also declared) until the various Arab-Israeliarmistice agreements were concluded in 1948-49. Most Westernliterature on the PalestineWar deals with the second phase, while the predominantsingle image of the war in the Westernmind is thatof a tiny,poorly armed and pacific Israel attackedin its cradle and withoutprovocation by the overwhelmingforce of the regulararmies of the neighboringArab states. In fact,of the two phases, thefirst was the more climactericand decisive.It was duringthis phase thatthe vastly larger forces at the disposal of theJewish Agency, infinitelybetter armed, organized, and led than anythingthe Palestinianspos- sessed, launched theirlong-prepared and contemplatedmajor offensiveunder Plan Dalet. The timingof the offensive(the firstweek of April1948) took advan- tage of the alreadyadvanced stage of disintegrationof Britishrule, although Brit- ain was to remainthe sovereignpower in the land until15 May. The objectiveof Plan Dalet was the establishmentby forceof armsof theJewish state in theJewish and Palestinianlands assigned to it by the UNGA partitionrecommendation and the conquest of as much additionalterritory (particularly Jerusalem) as possible. Strikinglyunavailable to the Westernreader has been contemporaneousmate- rial reflectingPalestinian or Arab conditions and perspectivesduring this first phase of the 1948 Palestinewar. The followingnine documentspertain to the last days of the Mandate fromthe end of Marchonward. They have been chosen for theirintrinsic worth and because theyreflect widely differing perspectives. Except for the second document,which has already appeared in printin Arabic,the othershave not to the best of myknowledge appeared beforein extenso in either Englishor Arabic. Read in sequence with my introductoiynotes and footnotes,they affordin- sightsinto several key aspects of the firstphase of the 1948 war: the asymmnetryin thebalance of power between thetwo sides, contemporaneousArab perspectives of thisbalance of power, the ignominiousbehavior of the Britishauthorities, the disarrayin Palestinianand Arab militaryorganization (but also the dedicationand courage of the Palestinianguerrillas), the militarystrategy and tactics of the Haganah and the "dissident"Irgun, the cause of the Palestinianexodus, the death Walid Khalidi, a founderof The Institutefor Palestine Studies and itsgeneral secretary, is a formerprofessor at OxfordUniversity, the American University of Beirut,and HarvardUniver- sity. Journal of Palestine Studies XXVII, no. 3 (Spring 1998), pp. 60-105. This content downloaded from 66.134.128.11 on Fri, 24 Jul 2015 20:24:50 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions SELECTED DOCUMENTS ON THE 1948 PALESTINE WAR 61 throesof the Palestiniancommunities of Jaffaand Haifa,the trueattitude of the Jewishauthorities to the exodus fromthe lattercity, the methods by which the Jewishauthorities implemented the UNGA partitionresolution, and the circum- stances thatinevitably led to the interventionof the regularArab armiesafter 15 May 1948. The documentsselected are as follows: The Military Situation in Palestine on the Eve of Plan Dalet "A BriefReport on the Situationin Palestineand ComparisonBetween the Forces and Potentialof Both Sides," by General Ismail Safwat, General OfficerCommanding, Arab League MilitaryCommittee, Da- mascus, to JamilMardam Bey, PrimeMinister of Syriaand Chairman of the PalestineCommittee of the Arab League, 23 March 1948 ....... 62 The Fall of Qastel and the Death of 'Abd al-Qadir An EyewitnessAccount by Bahjat Abu GharbiyyaExtracted from The Memoirs of a Freedom Fighter,1916-49, Institutefor Palestine Stud- ies, Beirut,1993 (in Arabic) ................ ............................ 72 The Fall of Haifa Arab NationalCommittee of Haifa,Letter to General Stockwell,Military Commander,North Sector, Haifa, Concerning His Statementof With- drawal,22 April1948 ................................................... 90 Arab NationalCommittee of Haifa,Aide-Memoire of the MeetingBe- tween General Stockwelland the Arab Representatives,22 April 1948 .......................................................... 92 The Haganah Command,Terms for a Truce BetweenJews and Arabs in Haifa,22 April1948 .................................................... 93 The Arab NationalCommittee of Haifa,Letter to General Stockwell SummarizingHis Positionat the 22 AprilTown Hall Meetings, 23 April1948 .......................................................... 95 Arab NationalCommittee of Haifa,Letter to Haifa MayorShabatai Levy, 23 April1948 ................... ........................................ 97 Arab NationalCommittee of Haifa,Letter to General Stockwell, 25 April1948 .......................................................... 98 The Fall of Jaffa Reportto Fawzi Qawukji, Commanderof the Arab LiberationArmy (ALA) CentralFront, from Captain Michel Issa, Head of the Ajnadin Battalion,6 May 1948................................................... 99 This content downloaded from 66.134.128.11 on Fri, 24 Jul 2015 20:24:50 UTC All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions 62 JOURNAL OF PALESTINE STUDIES THE MILITARY SITUATION IN PALESTINE ON THE EVE OF PLAN DALET "A BRIEF REPORT ON THE SITUATION IN PALESTINE AND COMPARISON BETWEEN THE FORCES AND POTENTIAL OF BOTH SIDES," BY GENERAL ISMAIL SAFWAT, GENERAL OF- FICER COMMANDING, ARAB LEAGUE MILITARY COMMITTEE, DAMAScuS, TO JAMIL MARDAm BEY, PRIME MINISTER OF SYRIA AND CHAIRMAN OF THE PALESTINE COMMITTEE OF THE ARAB LEAGUE, 23 MARCH 1948. As thepolitical situation in Palestine deterioratedfollowing the UN Special Committeeon Palestine'srecommendation ofpartition on 3 September1947, the Political Committeeof the Arab League Council based in Cairo appointed a Tech- nical Committeeof militaryexperts to reporton the militarysituation in the country.In the wake of the UNpartitionvote on 29 November1947, the Techni- cal Committeewas transformedinto the 'MilitaryCommittee" in overall charge of militarymatters in Palestine. Headquartered near Damascus, the committee had as its mandate to "ascertainthe defense needs of Palestine"and coordinate Arab effortswithin thatframework. General Ismail Safwat,the former Iraqi chief of staffwho had dominated the Technical Committee,was made its chairman. Fightingbetween Jewish and Palestinianforces broke out in the wake of the partition vote. The Palestinians were loosely organized in an irregularforce called Jihad Muqaddas (Holy War) under Abd al-Qadir al-Husayni,a charis- matic and highlypopular guerrillaleader and nephew ofHajjAmin al-Husayni, the exiled leader of theArab Higher Committee-thehighest Palestinian political body. The MilitaryCommittee, while reflectingthe Arab League's antipathyfor Hajj Amin and by extensionfor theforces allied to him,at the same time was sincerelyand deeplyskeptical on principle of the efficacyof guerrilla action. Its position,repeatedly expressed in reports,memoranda, and oralpresentationsto the Arab League's highestbodies, was that only the regularArab armies could counter theZionist onslaught. In his effortsto mobilize theArab states,General Safwat wrotea seriesof esca- lating reportsnoting thegrowing Zionist militarystrength and Arab weakness and stressingwith increasing urgencythe need for a massive and coordinated Arab effort.His firstreport, dated 9 October1947, recommended,among other things.the immediaterecruitment, training, and arming ofArab volunteers;the deploymentnear Palestine's bordersof regularArab troops,the establishmentof an overallgeneral Arab command;and theallocation of moneyand thedispatch ofarms in set quotas. TheLeague countriesbalked at Safwat'srecommendations. Money was sent to theMilitary Committee, but an overallgeneral command was notset up and riflesand arms weresuppliedfar below thequotas set outforeach country. But volunteersdid begin to arrive in Damascus, numberingabout 1,000 by the end of December 1947. AnotherIraqi, General Taha Hashimi, a former primneminister then in exile in
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction
    Cambridge University Press 978-0-521-87598-1 - The War for Palestine: Rewriting the History of 1948, Second Edition Edited by Eugene L. Rogan and Avi Shlaim Excerpt More information Introduction The Palestine War lasted less than twenty months, from the United Nations resolution recommending the partition of Palestine in November 1947 to the final armistice agreement signed between Israel and Syria in July 1949. Those twenty months transformed the political landscape of the Middle East forever. Indeed, 1948 may be taken as a defining moment for the region as a whole. Arab Palestine was destroyed and the new state of Israel established. Egypt, Syria and Lebanon suffered outright defeat, Iraq held its lines, and Transjordan won at best a pyrrhic victory. Arab public opinion, unprepared for defeat, let alone a defeat of this magnitude, lost faith in its politicians. Within three years of the end of the Palestine War, the prime ministers of Egypt and Lebanon and the king of Jordan had been assassinated, and the president of Syria and the king of Egypt over- thrown by military coups. No event has marked Arab politics in the second half of the twentieth century more profoundly. The Arab–Israeli wars, the Cold War in the Middle East, the rise of the Palestinian armed struggle, and the politics of peace-making in all of their complexity are a direct con- sequence of the Palestine War. The significance of the Palestine War also lies in the fact that it was the first challenge to face the newly independent states of the Middle East.
    [Show full text]
  • From the Editor by Rashid I. Khalidi Sixty Years Ago the Zionist
    Journal of Palestine Studies issue 147, published in Spring 2008 From the Editor by Rashid I. Khalidi Sixty years ago the Zionist movement launched an all-out military offensive to establish a Jewish state in a country with a two-thirds Arab majority. Victories followed in quick succession as the well-organized,well-armed Haganah battled poorly coordinated Arab irregulars and local militias. On 18 April 1948, after the prelude of the Dayr Yasin massacre and the conquest of Arab villages in the Jerusalem corridor, the mixed Arab-Jewish town of Tiberias was captured and its entire Arab population bused to Transjordan. The attack against the Arab quarters of Haifa, Palestine’s largest city, followed almost immediately; Haifa fell on 22 April. With the conquest of Arab Jaffa several weeks later, the fate of Palestine was sealed, and on 14 May 1948, the State of Israel was proclaimed. This issue of JPS commemorates this first crucial phase of the 1948 war with two articles about those first key Zionist victories: Mustafa Abbasi’s “The End of Arab Tiberias” and a reissue of Walid Khalidi’s landmark 1959 article, “The Fall of Haifa,” with a new introduction and footnotes by the author. The two articles have different approaches, with Abbasi focusing especially on the background to the tragedy, tracing the deterioration of relations between Tiberias’s Jewish and Palestinian communities, and Khalidi concentrating more on the immediate military and diplomatic background of the attack on Haifa and the progress of the battle itself. Both articles, however, highlight the extraordinary collusion between the Haganah and Britain, which in each case virtually turned the cities over to the Zionists.
    [Show full text]
  • 1948 Arab‒Israeli
    1948 Arab–Israeli War 1 1948 Arab–Israeli War מלחמת or מלחמת העצמאות :The 1948 Arab–Israeli War, known to Israelis as the War of Independence (Hebrew ,מלחמת השחרור :, Milkhemet Ha'atzma'ut or Milkhemet HA'sikhror) or War of Liberation (Hebrewהשחרור Milkhemet Hashikhrur) – was the first in a series of wars fought between the State of Israel and its Arab neighbours in the continuing Arab-Israeli conflict. The war commenced upon the termination of the British Mandate of Palestine and the Israeli declaration of independence on 15 May 1948, following a period of civil war in 1947–1948. The fighting took place mostly on the former territory of the British Mandate and for a short time also in the Sinai Peninsula and southern Lebanon.[1] ., al-Nakba) occurred amidst this warﺍﻟﻨﻜﺒﺔ :Much of what Arabs refer to as The Catastrophe (Arabic The war concluded with the 1949 Armistice Agreements. Background Following World War II, on May 14, 1948, the British Mandate of Palestine came to an end. The surrounding Arab nations were also emerging from colonial rule. Transjordan, under the Hashemite ruler Abdullah I, gained independence from Britain in 1946 and was called Jordan, but it remained under heavy British influence. Egypt, while nominally independent, signed the Anglo-Egyptian Treaty of 1936 that included provisions by which Britain would maintain a garrison of troops on the Suez Canal. From 1945 on, Egypt attempted to renegotiate the terms of this treaty, which was viewed as a humiliating vestige of colonialism. Lebanon became an independent state in 1943, but French troops would not withdraw until 1946, the same year that Syria won its independence from France.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Did the Palestinians Leave Revisited
    WHY DID THE PALESTINIANS LEAVE,REVISITED WALID KHALIDI Themyth that the Palestinian exodus of 1948 was triggered by orders from the Arab leaders—a cornerstone of the official Israeli version of the 1948 war and intended to absolve it of responsibility for the refugee problem—dies hard. Thus, it continues to be deployed by apol- Downloaded from http://online.ucpress.edu/jps/article-pdf/34/2/42/141663/jps_2005_34_2_042.pdf by guest on 02 June 2020 ogists for Israel as a means of blaming the Palestinians for their own fate. Even Benny Morris, one of whose major conclusions in his 1986 The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem wastodiscredit the Israeli claim, cannot seem to let go of it completely. Thus, the conclusion of the substantially revised update of the book, The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem Revisited (2004), states that although the Arab Higher Committee (AHC) and the local National Committees made efforts to block the exodus of army-aged males, “at the same time, they actively promoted the depopulation of villages and towns. Many thousands of Arabs—women, children, and old people ...left, well before battle was joined, as a result of advice and orders from local Arab commanders and officials.... Indeed, already months before the war the Arab states and the AHC had endorsed the removal of dependents from active and potential combat zones....There can be no exaggerating the impor- tance of these early, Arab-initiated evacuations in the demoralization, and eventual exodus, of the remaining rural and urban populations” (pp. 589–90). Given the endurance of this central plank of the Israeli doctrine of 1948, JPS has decided to reprint for the first time a difficult-to-obtain ar- ticle published in July 1959 by Walid Khalidi in a long-defunct periodi- cal of the American University of Beirut (AUB), Middle East Forum.
    [Show full text]
  • Arab-Israeli Relations Dr
    Arab-Israeli Relations Dr. Daniel Zisenwine Course Number 702.2280 Class Time: TBA Class Location:TBA E-Mail: [email protected] This course introduces students to the study of the Arab-Israeli conflict, from its initial stages starting from the first waves of Zionist immigration to Palestine through the 1948 war and the establishment of the state of Israel. It will focus on the emerging features of the conflict, the struggle between the Palestinian Arab and Jewish Nationalist movements, and the regional and international involvement in these events. Subsequent sessions will focus on the wars of 1956, 1967, 1973 and later developments such as the Egyptian-Israeli peace treaty (1979) and Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982. Moving closer to the present, the course will highlight the 1987 Palestinian Intifada, the Oslo accords and the prospects for peace leading up to the second Intifada and the breakdown of negotiations. We will conclude with a discussion of the current age of uncertainty in the region and the impact of non-state actors (such as Hizballah and Hamas) on the conflict, in an effort to bring the class up to the present as possible. A variety of scholarly studies, diverse opinions, and approaches will provide the background for class discussions. CLASS FORMAT This course uses a lecture and discussion format. Learning as a dynamic process in which the student and teacher interact over the material under discussion. You will learn best by asking questions; all questions are welcome and, if they are of interest to the class as a whole, we will stop and discuss them together.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth and Narrative in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Conference: February 27–March 1, 2003 John F
    WPF REPORTS number 34 Myth & Narrative in the Israeli-Palestinian Conflict Deborah L. West WORLD PEACE FOUNDATION FOUNDED 1910 THE WORLD PEACE FOUNDATION The World Peace Foundation was created in 1910 by the imagination and fortune of Edwin Ginn, the Bos- ton publisher, to encourage international peace and cooperation. The Foundation seeks to advance the cause of world peace through study, analysis, and the advocacy of wise action. As an operating, not a grant-giving foundation, it provides financial support only for projects which it has initiated itself. Edwin Ginn shared the hope of many of his contemporaries that permanent peace could be achieved. That dream was denied by the outbreak of World War I, but the Foundation has continued ever since to at- tempt to overcome obstacles to international peace and cooperation, drawing for its funding on the en- dowment bequeathed by the founder. In its early years, the Foundation focused its attention on building the peacekeeping capacity of the League of Nations, and then on the development of world order through the United Nations. The Foundation established and nurtured the premier scholarly journal in its field, International Organization. Since 1993, the Foundation has examined the causes and cures of intrastate conflict. The peace of the world in these decades has been disturbed primarily by outbreaks of vicious ethnic, religious, linguistic, and intercommunal antagonism within divided countries. The episodes of brutal ethnic cleansing that convulsed Rwanda, Bosnia, and Kosovo are but the best known and most devastating of a rash of such attempts to oust rivals across the globe.
    [Show full text]
  • 3 Mohammed S. Dajani
    ISRAELIS AND PALESTINIANS: CONTESTED NARRATIVES Mohammed S. Dajani Introduction Israeli scholar Yossi Klein Halevi begins the introduction of his book, At the Entrance of the Garden of Eden, A Jew’s Search for God with Christians and Muslims in the Holy Land, pub- lished in 2001, by saying: “In early winter 1998, I set out to discover my country, the Holy Land.”1 A Palestinian scholar embarking on reading this book would take issue by the proposition my preceding the word country that describes Halevi’s attachment to the Holy Land. This sense of belonging to the Holy Land by an Israeli clashes with the similar sense of belonging by a Palestinian, illuminating the crux of the Palestinian-Israeli confrontation and struggle. Historically, the conflict began with the assertion: “This land is mine”, and ever since the struggle focused on the question: “To whom does this land belong?” The way the question is constructed is in itself conflictual – “The land belongs to one and not the other!” This assumption gave rise to diametrically opposed conflicting national narratives that presented the claims of one against the other. This paper aims at confronting the Israeli and Palestinian constitutive historical clash of national narratives and their significance in shaping identities of “self” and “other” in the conflict and in constructing obstacles to conflict resolution. It looks into the historic junc- tions of decision-making and appraises processes that left their imprint on collective mem- ory and perceptions. Some of the major themes and histories will be analyzed and explained within their own historical context in order to deconstruct demonized images.
    [Show full text]
  • THIS ISSUE: PALESTINE Kerry's Billions an Interview with Walid Khalidi Raves, Prison Cells and Foucault Palest
    VVolumeolume 1010 - NumberNumber 2 FFebruaryebruary – MMarcharch 22014014 ££44 TTHISHIS ISSUEISSUE: PPALESTINEALESTINE ● KKerry’serry’s bbillionsillions ● AAnn iinterviewnterview withwith WalidWalid KhalidiKhalidi ● RRaves,aves, pprisonrison cellscells andand FoucaultFoucault ● PPalestinianalestinian refugeesrefugees andand thethe politicspolitics ofof returnreturn ● RRememberingemembering PalestinePalestine ● PPalestinianalestinian youthyouth challengechallenge thethe PrawerPrawer PlanPlan ● A cculturalultural mmissionission ● FFindinginding a voicevoice ● TTwowo ppoemsoems ● PPhotohoto competitioncompetition resultsresults ● PPLUSLUS RReviewseviews andand eventsevents inin LLondonondon VVolumeolume 1100 - NumberNumber 2 FFebruaryebruary – MMarcharch 22014014 ££44 TTHISHIS IISSUESSUE: PPALESTINEALESTINE ● KKerry’serry’s bbillionsillions ● AAnn iinterviewnterview wwithith WWalidalid KKhalidihalidi ● RRaves,aves, pprisonrison ccellsells aandnd FFoucaultoucault ● PPalestinianalestinian rrefugeesefugees aandnd thethe politicspolitics ooff returnreturn ● RRememberingemembering PPalestinealestine ● PPalestinianalestinian youthyouth cchallengehallenge thethe PPrawerrawer PPlanlan ● A cculturalultural mmissionission ● FFindinginding a vvoiceoice ● TTwowo ppoemsoems ● PPhotohoto ccompetitionompetition rresultsesults ● PPLUSLUS RReviewseviews aandnd eeventsvents iinn LLondonondon Birds of Paradise, 2011, by Palestinian artist Laila Shawa About the London Middle East Institute (LMEI) © Laila Shawa Volume 10 - Number 2 Th e London Middle East Institute
    [Show full text]
  • 1948 War Syllabus Hillel Cohen Hebrew University
    Palestine 1948 Graduate Students Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Rothberg International School Spring 2013 – Hillel Cohen View Syllabus The war of 1948 has shaped the history of modern Middle East more than any other single event. The establishment (and survival) of the state of Israel despite Arab efforts to avert it, on one hand, and the prevention of establishment an Arab state in Palestine while creating the Palestinian refugee problem, on the other, are the main lasting consequences of this war. Naturally enough, Zionists and Arabs see the events of 1948 rather differently (leaving alone the internal debates within each camp). Zionists view the result of the war as a fulfillment of a dream to regain Jewish sovereignty in the holy land after 2000 years of Diaspora, and a realization of their natural right to freedom and statehood, acknowledged by the international community after the Holocaust. Arabs, generally speaking, see the war as the culmination of a colonialist endeavor in which the Jews accomplished their idea of transferring the Arabs of Palestine, with the consent of the West who aimed to disunite the Arab nation. Debates on the real intentions of the Jewish forces during the war, as well as the reasons to the collapse of the Palestinian society, still exists in both scholarly and political writing. These debates touch the very core of Palestinian and Zionist narratives, the self- image of each society and the way they portray themselves to the outer world. Studying the events of 1948 is therefore rather problematic, taking into consideration that (almost) each of us carries with him his beliefs, previous knowledge, views, and to a certain degree his prejudices.
    [Show full text]
  • The Events of 1948 and the Palestinian Refugees
    The Events of 1948 and the Palestinian Refugees Summary by Ron Stockton We can learn much about history from first-hand reports. What follows are two types of reports: contemporary documents and the perspectives of those who were present, and the results of recent scholarship. There is an exceptional amount of rhetoric around these events. A polemic is an argument designed to prove that you are right and some rival group is wrong. There is a Jewish-Arab polemic and a Jewish-Jewish polemic [between the Ben-Gurion/Haganah/Labour left and the Begin/Herut/Likud right]. These polemics are only marginally included. Tessler discusses them more fully. The New Historians : When Menachem Begin became Prime Minister in 1977, he was so stung by allegations that he was a terrorist that he began to open the state archives to researchers. More archives were opened under the 50-year rule in 1997 and 1998. These produced a wave of new research based on documents, journals, reports, minutes. Israelis saw themselves as peaceful and accommodating and the Arab side as the problem. Four books shook the way Israelis saw this history. These were Simha Flapan’s The Birth of Israel: Myths and Realities; Benny Morris’ The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem, 1947-1949; Ilan Pappe’s Britain and the Arab-Israeli Conflict, 1948-1951; Avi Shlain’s Collusion Across the Jordan: King Abdullah, The Zionist Movement, and the Partition of Palestine; and Tom Segev, 1949:The First Israelis. Background: Fighting in Palestine went through three distinct stages with different characteristics and different military forces.
    [Show full text]
  • Course Document
    SCHOOL OF DIVINITY, HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY ACADEMIC SESSION 2018-2019 HI4025 – SPECIAL SUBJECT HISTORY OF THE ISRAELI-PALESTINIAN CONFLICT 30 CREDITS: 11 WEEKS PLEASE NOTE CAREFULLY: The full set of school regulations and procedures is contained in the Undergraduate Student Handbook which is available online at your MyAberdeen Organisation page. Students are expected to familiarise themselves not only with the contents of this leaflet but also with the contents of the Handbook. Therefore, ignorance of the contents of the Handbook will not excuse the breach of any School regulation or procedure. You must familiarise yourself with this important information at the earliest opportunity. COURSE CO-ORDINATOR Dr Alessandra Cecolin Office: Crombie Annexe, CA205 Office hours: Tuesdays 1pm-2pm Email: [email protected] Tel: 01224 272348 Discipline Administration 9 Mrs Barbara McGillivray/Mrs Gillian Brown 201 50-52 College Bounds - 8 Room CBLG01 201 | 01224 272199/272454 - [email protected] Course Document 1 TIMETABLE For time and place of classes, please see MyAberdeen Students can view their university timetable at http://www.abdn.ac.uk/infohub/study/timetables-550.php COURSE DESCRIPTION This course aims to provide an historical survey of the development and evolution of what is commonly referred to as the Arab-Israeli conflict. It examines the origins of the Arab-Israeli conflict in an attempt to place it in its historical context, while tracing its developments from multiple angles in order to provide a comprehensive understanding of the complex dynamic that constitutes ‘the conflict’. The period under examination covers defining moments of the history of the conflicts from the establishment of the Jewish community in Palestine the so-called Old Yishuv, through the subsequent history of the State of Israel from 1948 until the present.
    [Show full text]
  • Professor Walid Khalidi Palestine and Palestine Studies: One Century After World War I and the Balfour Declaration
    1 Center of Palestine Studies, SOAS, University of London First Annual Lecture, 6 March 2014 Professor Walid Khalidi Palestine and Palestine Studies: One Century after World War I and the Balfour Declaration I WE MEET TODAY to celebrate the second anniversary of the establishment of the SOAS Center for Palestine Studies. I am honored to have been asked to deliver this first Annual Lecture. It is deeply gratifying to be addressing you on this occasion in the name of a sister institution—IPS—which has just celebrated its 50th anniversary as an independent, private, non-partisan, non-profit, public service research institute. WE AT IPS look forward to long years of innovative cooperation between our two institutions. Like other centers of Palestine studies, we are both researching the same phenomenon: the ever-growing accumulation of debris generated on that fateful day of November 2nd 1917 by the so-called Balfour Declaration, the single most destructive political document on the Middle East in the 20th century. HOW FAR this university has travelled—and how alien the idea of a Center for Palestine Studies would have been to Lord Balfour—can be gauged from the oft-quoted words, dripping with Olympian disdain, he uttered in 1919: The Great Powers are committed to Zionism. And Zionism, be it right or wrong, good or bad, is rooted in age-long traditions, in present needs, in future hopes, of far profounder import than the desires and prejudices of the 700,000 Arabs who now inhabit that ancient land. 2 THE expression “Palestine Problem” is shorthand for the genesis, evolution, and fall-out of the Zionist colonization of Palestine, which began in the early 1880s and is ongoing at this very hour.
    [Show full text]