<<

COMMENT

and policy journals: Energy Policy and The Energy Journal have high impact factors, and The Electricity Journal was included to sample a regulatory journal. I found four worrisome trends: an undervaluation of the influence of social dimensions on energy use; a bias DIETER TELEMANS/PANOS DIETER towards science, engineering and over other social sciences and the humanities; a lack of interdisciplinary collaboration; and the under-representation of female authors or those from minority groups. For instance, technology adoption, the complexity of choice-making, and the human dimensions of energy use and environ­mental change were rarely covered (see ‘Neglected topics’). Most articles (85%) focused on advanced energy-production systems, such as nuclear reactors, sources of renewable electricity and biofuels, or the technical elements of electricity generation, transmission and distribution — hardware — rather than the human ‘software’ behind it. Simple devices such as cooking stoves, bicycles, light bulbs and distributed gen- eration were studied in less than 3.5% of articles. Behaviour and energy demand was Masai women from Kenya take a course on solar energy in India. investigated in less than 2.2% of papers. If this work is being published, it is in environ- mental sociology, and political- science journals that few energy researchers Energy studies read. SOCIAL OUTCASTS Social-science authorship and citations are also relatively low (see ‘Publishing trends’). need Science, engineering, economics and sta- tistics account for more than half (67%) A broader pool of expertise is needed to understand of institutional affiliations as reported by authors; non-economic social science for how human behaviour affects energy demand and the less than 20%. Sociology, geography, his- uptake of technologies, says Benjamin K. Sovacool. tory, psychology, communication studies and each constituted less than 0.3% of author affiliations. o secure a safe, reliable and low- frequently obsess over technical fixes rather References to social-science and humani- carbon energy future, we must alter than ways to alter lifestyles and social norms6. ties journals, with their insights into how con- both technologies and human behav- Interdisciplinary research remains stymied by sumers and politicians behave, were less than Tiour1. The US Department of Energy notes2 institutional barriers in academia and govern- 4.3% of 90,097 citations across the sample. that supply and demand is “affected as much ment7. National and local energy bodies have Little research took place in the ‘real world’. by individual choice, preference, and behav- conventionally had few social scientists on Most studies are the result of work under- ior, as by technical performance”. staff 8. And most leading journals in the field taken at the bench or desk using computer Yet many researchers and policy-makers focus on one discipline. models and experiments, rather than field continue to focus on only one side of the Now the energy field needs to learn from research, interviews and surveys. energy dilemma. In the United States, for health, agriculture and business, and bring Another trend is that the scientists and every dollar in research funds spent on behav- together social and physical scientists. Uni- engineers writing in these journals rarely ioural and demand-side energy research, $35 versities should develop courses focused on collaborate beyond their fields. About half of is spent on energy supply and infrastructure3. solving energy problems, granting agencies published authors in the sample wrote alone Social sciences, humanities, and the arts are should prioritize and direct more money to and one-quarter published with colleagues marginalized in energy research, and major behavioural work, and energy journals should within their discipline. Less than 23% of arti- statistical agencies do not usually collect broaden their scope. Already, there are prom- cles involved interdisciplinary collaborations qualitative data about energy consumption. ising examples of how inclusive and inter- between authors. Similar problems are apparent in Europe4. disciplinary energy research can encourage Furthermore, the vast majority of authors My analysis of the peer-reviewed energy- energy efficiency, and so address global envi- hale from affluent Western institutions and research literature shows how biases handi- ronmental challenges such as climate change9. countries where research money is abun- cap the field5. Engineers and economists are I examined the authorship and scope of dant. They focus on problems facing the ignoring people and miscasting decision- 4,444 full-length articles over 15 years (1999 industrialized world. Of the 9,549 authors making and action. Academic researchers to 2013) in three leading energy technology who listed their country of residence, 87%

31 JULY 2014 | VOL 511 | NATURE | 529 © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved COMMENT came from either North America or western Europe. African, Asian, Latin American and PUBLISHING TRENDS Middle Eastern authors were few. Authors Social-science studies were rarely published in three leading energy journals from 1999 to 2013. The emphasis on technology rather than human behaviour in energy research is re ected in the disciplinary were mostly male: only 15.7% could be iden- backgrounds of authors, work referenced, and methods used. 5 SOURCE: REF. tified as female. Norms of authorship and collaboration vary, but these trends held Economics and statistics Architecture and buildings Other AUTHOR’S DISCIPLINE 20.3% 3.1% 8.3% for each year examined: female authorship remained below 17.4% and non-Western authorship under 16%, for example. Science, engineering and energy Social sciences Life sciences 46.7% 19.6% 2.0%

FIVE RECOMMENDATIONS Arts and humanities Economics Self-citations To bring in social scientists and other CITED SOURCES 0.1% 9.9% 7.3% marginalized researchers, I have five recom- mendations. Non-classied and grey literature Science Books Social science First, public and private organizations 60.8% 10.1% 7.6% 4.2% should overhaul the way they structure and disburse funding for energy research and ARTICLE METHODS development. They should give a bigger slice to social scientists, improve incentives for Quantitative Qualitative Not applicable interdisciplinary work and prioritize social 58% 13% 29% topics in their funding calls — such as the per- ceptions of energy users, the needs of people affected by energy production and prevailing use. Good examples include the Univer- mixed-methods research. A new journal customs, traditions and behaviours. sity of Edinburgh, UK, which offers an published by Elsevier, Energy Research & Second, to reduce disciplinary bias, energy interdisciplinary master’s degree in climate Social Science (of which I am editor-in-chief), ministries, statistical agencies and public accounting; Aarhus University in Denmark calls explicitly in its aims and scope for papers utility commissions should focus more on has a business-development degree that that blend disciplinary concepts, go beyond energy behaviour and demand, rather than combines engineering, innovation studies, single case studies, and utilize an assortment just supply. Delaware and the District of energy studies, business and ; and of methods. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Columbia, for instance, have sustainable- Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh, Energy and Environment also seeks cross- energy utilities, which advise residents about Pennsylvania, has an engineering and public disciplinary assessments of energy systems. behavioural changes they can make to save policy department. Outside academia, the Energy studies must become more socially energy and money. The statewide energy- US Defense Advanced Research Projects oriented, interdisciplinary and heterogene- efficiency utility, Efficiency Vermont, pro- Agency has successfully used a ‘challenges- ous. Problem-focused research activities that vides funding and behavioural guidance to centred’ approach to national-security centre on both physical and social processes, homes, farms and factories. problems since it was created in 1958. include diverse actors and mix qualitative Third, administrators should make Fourth, researchers should do more to and quantitative methods, have a better energy research more problem-oriented, accommodate expertise and data from lay- chance of achieving analytic excellence and including social perspectives as a matter of persons, indigenous groups, community social impact. ■ course. Universities should develop topi- leaders and other non-conventional par- cal programmes on energy, as they have in ticipants. Although this may require special Benjamin K. Sovacool is professor of agricultural research, medicine and busi- training to do effectively, such interactions business and social sciences, and director ness. Curricula might include efficient and would encourage greater feedback and inte- of the Centre for Energy Technologies, at sustainable consumption, risk management, grate diverse viewpoints. Aarhus University in Denmark. He is also public decision-making and the design Fifth, journal editors can prioritize associate professor of law at Vermont Law of technologies for public acceptance and interdisciplinary, inclusive, comparative, School in South Royalton, Vermont, USA, and editor-in-chief of Energy Research & NEGLECTED TOPICS Social Science. Twelve subjects seldom considered in energy studies. e-mail: [email protected] Topic Example 1. Dietz, T., Gardner, G.T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P. C. & Vandenbergh, M. P. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, Gender and identity Pollution from cooking stoves posing greater risk to women than men 18452–18456 (2009). Philosophy and ethics Future generations bearing the burden of pollution 2. US Department of Energy Report on the First Quadrennial Technology Review 125 (US Communication and persuasion Energy information changing individual or firm behaviour Department of Energy, 2011). 3. Gaffigan, M. E. Advanced Energy Technologies: 5 FROM REF. SOURCE: ADAPTED Geography and scale Mismatching the size of energy systems to patterns of demand Budget Trends and Challenges for DOE’s Energy R&D Program (US Government Accountability Social psychology and behaviour Shaping energy choices by trust, control and denial Office, 2008). Anthropology and culture Temporal and regional differences in conceptions of energy services 4. Goldblatt, D. L. et al. (eds) Tackling Long-Term Global Energy Problems: The Contribution of Research and innovation How people, markets and institutions drive innovation Social Science (Springer, 2012). 5. Sovacool, B. K. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 1, 1–29 and Resources contributing to conflict or stymying growth (2014). Institutions and energy governance Evolving rules and norms to address collective energy problems 6. D’Agostino, A. L. et al. Energy 36, 508–519 (2011). Energy and development Energy use contributing to economic growth and falling poverty 7. Lutzenhiser, L. & Shove, E. Energy Policy 27, 217–227 (1999). Externalities and pollution Costs to society of erosions of environmental and ecological capital 8. Stern, P. C. Science 260, 1897–1899 (1993). 9. Alcott, H. & Mullainathan, S. Science 327, Sociology of technology Economic, political and social drivers of energy consumption 1204–1205 (2010).

530 | NATURE | VOL 511 | 31 JULY 2014 © 2014 Macmillan Publishers Limited. All rights reserved