DOCSLIB.ORG

The Glossary: Ecological Economics from the Bottom-Up

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Glossary: Ecological Economics from the Bottom-Up The Glossary: Ecological Economics from the Bottom-Up 1 List of CEECEC Partner Organisations CSO Partners Centre for Science and Environment, India Centre pour l'Environnement et le Développement, Cameroon Acción Ecológica, Ecuador Ecological Society Endemit, Serbia A Sud - Ecologia e Cooperazione, Italy Vlaams Overleg Duurzame Ontwikkeling, Belgium (Flanders) Sunce, Association for Nature, Environment and Sustainable Development, Croatia Instituto Rede Brasileira Agroflorestal, Brazil Research Partners ICTA, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain (CEECEC Coordinators) IFF, Universität Klagenfurt, Austria GEPAMA, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina Foundation of the Faculty of Sciences and Technology, New University of Lisbon, Portugal Université Libre de Bruxelles, Belgium SERI Nachhaltigkeitsforschungs und Kommunikations GmbH, Austria 2 How to Use this Glossary Download and save the document to your computer in order to navigate quickly and easily between text and hyperlinks. If you are using Adobe Reader 9 go to ―View‖ in the toolbar and select ―Go to‖ and then ―Previous view‖ to return to your place in the text after following a hyperlink, or use the keyboard shortcut Alt +Left Arrow Table of Contents Introduction 5 23. Eco-Efficiency 54 1 Access and Use Rights 6 24. Ecological Debt 55 2. Activist Knowledge 8 25. Ecological Economics 58 3. Affluence and Environmental Impact 10 26. Ecological Footprint 60 4. Avoided Deforestation (REDD+) 13 27. Ecological Rucksacks and Hidden Flows 64 5. Bulk Commodities and Preciosities 16 28. Ecologically Unequal Exchange 66 6. Carbon Trade 18 29. Economic Valuation 69 7. Carrying Capacity 20 29.1 Contingent Valuation 69 8. Coasian Bargaining 21 Use and Non Use Values 70 9. Co-Management and Nature Conservation 23 Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept 70 9.1 Joint Forest Management 24 29.2 Cost benefit analysis 72 10. Commodity Chains 25 11. Commodity Frontiers 28 29.3 Discount Rate 76 11.1 Land Grabbing 28 29.4 Net Present Value 79 12. Common Pool Resources 29 29.5 Travel Cost Method 82 13. Complexity 32 30. Ecosystem Services 84 14. Consumption 34 31. Energy use 87 14.1 Sustainable consumption 35 32. Entropy 88 15. Corporate Accountability 37 33. Environmental Impact Assessment 90 16. Corporate Social Responsibility 38 34. Environmental (In)justice 92 17. Customary Rights 41 35. The Environmentalism of the Poor 94 18. Dams (Krutilla‘s method) 42 36. EROI (Net Energy Analysis) 96 19. Decoupling and Dematerialization of the 37. Externalities 98 Economy 45 37.1 Cost-shifting 98 20. Degrowth 46 38. Extractive Periphery 100 21. Depopulation 50 38.1 World Systems Analysis 101 22. DPSIR 51 39. Fair Trade 103 3 40. Forest Economics 105 65. Post-Normal Science 176 41. Funds and Stocks 108 66. Precautionary Principle 179 42. GDP Accounting and Critiques 109 67. Property Rights 182 43. GDP of the Poor 111 68. Rebound Effect (Jevons‘ Paradox) 184 44. Governance 113 69. Resilience 185 45. Green Accounting 116 70. Resource Intensity and Resource Productivity 187 46. Greenwash 118 71. Scenarios and Visioning 190 47. HANPP and Colonization 120 72. Social Metabolism and Accounting 48. Hazards, Disasters, and Complex Approaches 194 Disasters 125 72.1 Material Flow Analysis (MFA) 195 49. Institutions 130 72.2 Input-Output Analyses (IO) 197 50. Languages of Valuation 132 72.3 Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) 198 50.1 Landscape Value 133 72.4 Life Cycle Inventory (LCI) 199 51. Lawrence Summers‘ Principle 135 52. Natural (Environmental) and Social Capital 72.5 Life Cycle Impact Assessment (LCIA) 137 199 53. Natural Capital Depletion Tax 139 73. Social Multi-Criteria Assessment 201 54. Needs 142 73.1 Social Multi-Criteria Evaluation (SMCE) 202 55. NIMBY (Not in My Back Yard) 145 74. Sustainable Extraction 204 56. Opportunity Cost 149 75. Tragedy of the Commons: Hardin‘s 57. Participative Democracy and Public Mistake 205 Participation 151 75.1 Enclosure of the Commons 206 58. Payment for Environmental / Ecosystem Services 157 76. Transaction Cost 208 59. Peak Oil 161 77. Uncertainty and Risk 210 60. Policy Instruments for Sustainability 165 78. Value Incommensurability 214 61. Policy Instruments for Sustainable 79. Virtual Water and Water Footprints 216 Tourism 167 80. Weak vs. Strong Sustainability 218 62. Political Ecology 170 81. Well Being 221 63. Polluter Pays Principle 172 64. Popular Epidemiology 174 4 Introduction This glossary is the product of collaborative efforts between environmental activists and ecological economists from around the world, all belonging to the CEECEC network (see List of Partner Organisations). CEECEC (www.ceecec.net) is a project funded by the European Commission‘s Science in Society programme, running from April 2008-September 2010, under the Seventh Framework Programme (FP7). Its overarching objective is twofold: to build the capacity of civil society organisations (CSOs) to participate in and lead ecological economics research on sustainability issues for the benefit of their organisational goals, while at the same time to enrich ecological economics research with highly valuable activist knowledge. CEECEC has taken an approach illustrative of what Andrew Stirling of SPRU (Science and Technology Policy Research), University of Sussex, has called cooperative research. This is a new form of research process which involves both researchers and non-researchers in close co-operative engagement, encompassing a full spectrum of approaches, frameworks and methods, from interdisciplinary collaboration through stakeholder negotiation to transdisciplinary deliberation and citizen participation. This is not new in practice. For instance, the first reports on the State of the Environment in India were put together in the 1980s by drawing on knowledge of both activist organizations and academics across the sub-continent. In CEECEC, CSO partners with total autonomy chose conflicts they wanted to focus on to develop into case studies. The CEECEC team at ICTA UAB, other academic partners, and other participating CSOs, further developed the case study drafts, deciding on the appropriate concepts from ecological economics to be applied or presented in those contexts. Environmental CSOs, particularly those concerned with environmental justice (we refer to these as Environmental Justice Organisations, or EJOs), frequently carry out research on environmental conflicts, writing reports as part of their advocacy work. CEECEC then provided to these EJOs a critical audience of interested activist and academic partners who asked questions, gave encouragement, made comparisons, and suggested key words and references, keeping in mind the final objective of developing a Handbook (as well as a series of lectures) useful for teaching ecological economics from the "bottom-up" instead of from first principles. The glossary and its entries are a by-product of the CEECEC online handbook, Ecological Economics from the Bottom-up. It was written by CEECEC partners to complement the case study chapters in the handbook by explaining in greater depth the concepts presented within them. Glossary entries were produced by drawing upon knowledge already in the public domain (on the internet and in other publications in ecological economics and political ecology), and in some cases, on the original research of the authors. There are over 90 entries in all, covering topics in alphabetical order from Access and Use Rights to Well Being. Many of the Glossary entries are key words of the case study chapters in the handbook, but not all. The glossary, (like the handbook) may be used as a stand-alone resource for anyone from the general public, civil society or academia in search of a reference tool for the concepts and methods of ecological economics and political ecology. 5 1 Access and Use Rights Definition and Purpose Among the institutional arrangements regulating human-nature relationships, rights and obligations to natural resources, access and use rights in particular play a crucial role (Bromley, 1991; Ostrom & Schlager, 1996; Le Roy, 1996; Van Griethuysen, 2006). Such rights or rules exist in all societies, whether they are tribal, feudal, capitalist or socialist. They basically respond to the universal question of social reproduction and are obviously culture-specific and exhibit considerable diversity and variation. On the one hand, they determine the types of interactions that members of society may or may not have with the natural environment. On the other hand, they are essential factors of power and social status because of the control they confer over natural resources, and as such constitute strategic elements in the dynamics of wealth creation and reinforcement of power. Bromley (1991) uses the term institutional regime to refer to the set of institutional arrangements relating to a resource or a set of natural resources. A typology of rights concerning natural resources The typology most commonly referred to in the literature is the one proposed by Ostrom and Schlager (1996), which defines a cumulative gradation between rights: Access right: right to access a resource for any use not involving its consumption; Peluso and Ribot (2003) have defined access as the ability (not necessarily the right) to derive benefits from things; Withdrawal right: right to withdraw some elements from the resource; Management right: right to determine how, when and where a withdrawal may take place; Exclusion right: right to determine who has rights of access, withdrawal and management, and who
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Shopping Externalities and Self-Fulfilling Unemployment Fluctuations
    NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES SHOPPING EXTERNALITIES AND SELF-FULFILLING UNEMPLOYMENT FLUCTUATIONS Greg Kaplan Guido Menzio Working Paper 18777 http://www.nber.org/papers/w18777 NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 February 2013 We thank the Kielts-Nielsen Data Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business for providing access to the Kielts-Nielsen Consumer Panel Dataset. We thank the editor, Harald Uhlig, and three anonymous referees for insightful and detailed suggestions that helped us revising the paper. We are also grateful to Mark Aguiar, Jim Albrecht, Michele Boldrin, Russ Cooper, Ben Eden, Chris Edmond, Roger Farmer, Veronica Guerrieri, Bob Hall, Erik Hurst, Martin Schneider, Venky Venkateswaran, Susan Vroman, Steve Williamson and Randy Wright for many useful comments. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Bureau of Economic Research. NBER working papers are circulated for discussion and comment purposes. They have not been peer- reviewed or been subject to the review by the NBER Board of Directors that accompanies official NBER publications. © 2013 by Greg Kaplan and Guido Menzio. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source. Shopping Externalities and Self-Fulfilling Unemployment Fluctuations Greg Kaplan and Guido Menzio NBER Working Paper No. 18777 February 2013, Revised October 2013 JEL No. D11,D21,D43,E32 ABSTRACT We propose a novel theory of self-fulfilling unemployment fluctuations. According to this theory, a firm hiring an additional worker creates positive external effects on other firms, as a worker has more income to spend and less time to search for low prices when he is employed than when he is unemployed.
    [Show full text]
  • 9.1 Financial Cost Compared with Economic Cost 9.2 How
    9.0 MEASUREMENT OF COSTS IN CONSERVATION 9.1 Financial Cost Compared with Economic Cost{l} Since financial analysis relates primarily to enterprises operating in the market place, the data of costs and retums are derived from the market prices ( current or expected) of the transactions as they are experienced. Thus the cost of land, capital, construction, etc. is the ~ recorded price of the accountant. By contrast, in economic analysis ( such as cost bene fit analysis) the costs and benefits of a project are analysed from the point of view of society and not from the point of view of a single agent's utility of the landowner or developer. They are termed economic. Some effects of the project, though conceming the single agent, do not affect society. Interest on borrowing, taxes, direct or indirect subsidies are transfers that do not deploy real resources and do not therefore constitute an economic cost. The costs and the retums are, in part at least, based on shadow prices, which reflect their "social value". Economic rate of retum could therefore differ from the financial costs which are based on the concept of "opportunity cost"; they are measured not in relation to the transaction itself but to the value of the resources which that financial cost could command, just as benefits are valued by the resource costs required to achieve them. This differentiation leads to the following significant rules in conside ring costs in cost benefit analysis, as for example: (a) Interest on money invested This is a transfer cost between borrower and lender so that the economyas a whole is no different as a result.
    [Show full text]
  • Curious About Cryptocurrencies? Investors Need to Make Sure They Separate “Investing” from “Speculation” by Don Mcarthur, CFA®
    Curious About Cryptocurrencies? Investors Need to Make Sure They Separate “Investing” from “Speculation” By Don McArthur, CFA® Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies have received plenty of media coverage lately, and it is natural for investors to wonder about them. Even celebrities have become associated with Bitcoin publicity through social media. Interest has piqued to a point where there are even Exchange Traded Funds (ETFs) that invest in Bitcoin, giving investors the means to invest in the Futures market. After having performed in-depth research on Bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies, our position at Commerce Trust Company is that they should not currently play a role in client portfolios. As part of that research, Commerce Senior Vice President and Investment Analyst Don McArthur, CFA, put together a primer on the topic of cryptocurrencies in general. In the following commentary, he explains why Bitcoin at this stage is more about speculating than investing in something with intrinsic value. He also touches on how Blockchain networking technology not only supports cryptocurrencies, but many other industrial applications as well. We thought you would enjoy this commentary as McArthur shares his thoughts in a mind-opening Q&A. Q . What is Bitcoin and how did it start? A. Bitcoin is one of hundreds of digital currencies, or cryptocurrency, based on Blockchain technology. As an early mover, Bitcoin is by far the largest digital currency. Bitcoin was launched in 2009 by a mysterious person (or persons) known only by the pseudonym Satoshi Nakamoto. Unlike traditional currencies, which are issued by central banks, Bitcoin has no central monetary authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Economics of Investment in Human Resources
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 04E d48 VT 012 352 AUTHOR Wood, W. D.; Campbell, H. F. TITLE Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Economics of Investment in Human Resources. An Annotated Bibliography. INSTITUTION Queen's Univ., Kingston (Ontario). Industrial Felaticns Centre. REPORT NO Eibliog-Ser-NO-E PU2 EATS 70 NOTE 217F, AVAILABLE FROM Industrial Relations Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada ($10.00) EDBS PRICE EDPS Price MF-$1.00 HC Not Available from EDRS. DESCRIPTORS *Annotated Bibliographies, *Cost Effectiveness, *Economic Research, *Human Resources, Investment, Literature Reviews, Resource Materials, Theories, Vocational Education ABSTRACT This annotated bibliography presents 389 citations of periodical articles, monographs, and books and represents a survey of the literature as related to the theory and application of cost-benefit analysis. Listings are arranged alphabetically in these eight sections: (1) Human Capital, (2) Theory and Application of Cost-Benefit Analysis, (3) Theoretical Problems in Measuring Benefits and Costs,(4) Investment Criteria and the Social Discount Rate, (5) Schooling,(6) Training, Retraining and Mobility, (7) Health, and (P) Poverty and Social Welfare. Individual entries include author, title, source information, "hea"ings" of the various sections of the document which provide a brief indication of content, and an annotation. This bibliography has been designed to serve as an analytical reference for both the academic scholar and the policy-maker in this area. (Author /JS) 00 oo °o COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS AND THE ECONOMICS OF INVESTMENT IN HUMAN RESOURCES An Annotated Bibliography by W. D. WOOD H. F. CAMPBELL INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS CENTRE QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY Bibliography Series No. 5 Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Economics of investment in Human Resources U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • New Insights on Retail E-Commerce (July 26, 2017)
    U.S. Department of Commerce Economics Newand Insights Statistics on Retail Administration E-Commerce Office of the Chief Economist New Insights on Retail E-Commerce Executive Summary The U.S. Census Bureau has been collecting data on retail sales since the 1950s and data on e-commerce retail sales since 1998. As the Internet has become ubiquitous, many retailers have created websites and even entire divisions devoted to fulfilling online orders. Many consumers have By turned to e-commerce as a matter of convenience or to increase the Jessica R. Nicholson variety of goods available to them. Whatever the reason, retail e- commerce sales have skyrocketed and the Internet will undoubtedly continue to influence how consumers shop, underscoring the need for good data to track this increasingly important economic activity. In June 2017, the Census Bureau released a new supplemental data table on retail e-commerce by type of retailer. The Census Bureau developed these estimates by re-categorizing e-commerce sales data from its ESA Issue Brief existing “electronic shopping” sales data according to the primary #04-17 business type of the retailer, such as clothing stores, food stores, or electronics stores. This report examines how the new estimates enhance our understanding of where consumers are shopping online and also provides an overview of trends in retail and e-commerce sales. Findings from this report include: E-commerce sales accounted for 7.2 percent of all retail sales in 2015, up dramatically from 0.2 percent in 1998. July 26, 2017 E-commerce sales have been growing nine times faster than traditional in-store sales since 1998.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Science Degree
    Social Science Degree B.A. Study what you love, create your own curriculum and build the skills you need to thrive in any career. From anthropology and geography to sociology and economics, the social sciences offer a world of fascinating topics. With a Social Science degree, you can combine your fields of interest and create your own unique program that will enable you to examine any issue from multiple diverse perspectives. Program type: Major Format: On Campus or Online Est. time to complete: 4 years Credit hours: 120 Why earn a social science degree? Application Deadlines Fall: Aug. 16 Spring: Dec. 15 Summer: May 1 To succeed in today's competitive job market, you need outstanding skills in communication, problem solving, teamwork and critical thinking. This versatile bachelor's degree offers many career choices and opens the doors to a variety of employment options. The online flexibility of the Social Science degree makes it a popular choice for transfer students looking to earn a bachelor's degree. The bachelor degree in Social Science can be completed through UND's online enroll anytime courses. Build Your Own Bachelor Degree in Social Science In collaboration with your academic advisor, you'll create your own interdisciplinary curriculum and pursue your interests. Choose online or in-person classes from: Anthropology Communication Criminal Justice Economics Geography History Political Science Psychology Sociology You can also focus on a particular theme through directed study in: Health and Human Services Economic and Political Science Studies Social Science Degree at UND 1/2 Study abroad in Brazil, Belize, China, Chile, Spain, Ireland or Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Commerce Integration and Economic Development: Evidence from China∗
    E-Commerce Integration and Economic Development: Evidence from China∗ Victor Couture,y Benjamin Faber,z Yizhen Gu§ and Lizhi Liu{ July 2017 –Preliminary and incomplete– Abstract The number of people buying and selling products online in China has grown from practically zero in 2000 to more than 400 million by 2015. Most of this growth has occurred in cities. In this context, the Chinese government recently announced the expansion of e-commerce to the countryside as a policy priority with the objective to close the rural-urban economic divide. As part of this agenda, the government entered a partnership with a large Chinese e-commerce firm. The program invests in the necessary transport logistics to ship products to and sell prod- ucts from tens of thousands of villages that were largely unconnected to e-commerce. The firm also installs an e-commerce terminal at a central village location, where a terminal manager assists households in buying and selling products through the firm’s e-commerce platform. This paper combines a new collection of survey and transaction microdata with a randomized control trial (RCT) across villages that we implement in collaboration with the e-commerce firm. We use this empirical setting to provide evidence on the potential of e-commerce inte- gration to foster economic development in the countryside, the underlying channels and the distribution of the gains from e-commerce across households and villages. Keywords: E-commerce, trade integration, economic development, rural-urban divide JEL Classification: F63, O12, R13 ∗We are grateful to CEGA, the Clausen Center, the Haas School of Business, the Weiss Family Fund and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation for providing funding for this study.
    [Show full text]
  • Lost Wages: the COVID-19 Cost of School Closures
    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13641 Lost Wages: The COVID-19 Cost of School Closures George Psacharopoulos Victoria Collis Harry Anthony Patrinos Emiliana Vegas AUGUST 2020 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13641 Lost Wages: The COVID-19 Cost of School Closures George Psacharopoulos Harry Anthony Patrinos Georgetown University The World Bank and IZA Victoria Collis Emiliana Vegas The EdTech Hub Center for Universal Education, Brookings AUGUST 2020 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. ISSN: 2365-9793 IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 13641 AUGUST 2020 ABSTRACT Lost Wages: The COVID-19 Cost of School Closures1 Social distancing requirements associated with COVID-19 have led to school closures.
    [Show full text]
  • Geoengineering in the Anthropocene Through Regenerative Urbanism
    geosciences Review Geoengineering in the Anthropocene through Regenerative Urbanism Giles Thomson * and Peter Newman Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute, Curtin University, Perth 6102, WA, Australia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +61-8-9266-9030 Academic Editors: Carlos Alves and Jesus Martinez-Frias Received: 26 June 2016; Accepted: 13 October 2016; Published: 25 October 2016 Abstract: Human consumption patterns exceed planetary boundaries and stress on the biosphere can be expected to worsen. The recent “Paris Agreement” (COP21) represents a major international attempt to address risk associated with climate change through rapid decarbonisation. The mechanisms for implementation are yet to be determined and, while various large-scale geoengineering projects have been proposed, we argue a better solution may lie in cities. Large-scale green urbanism in cities and their bioregions would offer benefits commensurate to alternative geoengineering proposals, but this integrated approach carries less risk and has additional, multiple, social and economic benefits in addition to a reduction of urban ecological footprint. However, the key to success will require policy writers and city makers to deliver at scale and to high urban sustainability performance benchmarks. To better define urban sustainability performance, we describe three horizons of green urbanism: green design, that seeks to improve upon conventional development; sustainable development, that is the first step toward a net zero impact; and the emerging concept of regenerative urbanism, that enables biosphere repair. Examples of green urbanism exist that utilize technology and design to optimize urban metabolism and deliver net positive sustainability performance. If mainstreamed, regenerative approaches can make urban development a major urban geoengineering force, while simultaneously introducing life-affirming co-benefits to burgeoning cities.
    [Show full text]
  • Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee April 27–28, 2021
    _____________________________________________________________________________________________Page 1 Minutes of the Federal Open Market Committee April 27–28, 2021 A joint meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee Ann E. Misback, Secretary, Office of the Secretary, and the Board of Governors was held by videoconfer- Board of Governors ence on Tuesday, April 27, 2021, at 9:30 a.m. and con- tinued on Wednesday, April 28, 2021, at 9:00 a.m.1 Matthew J. Eichner,2 Director, Division of Reserve Bank Operations and Payment Systems, Board of PRESENT: Governors; Michael S. Gibson, Director, Division Jerome H. Powell, Chair of Supervision and Regulation, Board of John C. Williams, Vice Chair Governors; Andreas Lehnert, Director, Division of Thomas I. Barkin Financial Stability, Board of Governors Raphael W. Bostic Michelle W. Bowman Sally Davies, Deputy Director, Division of Lael Brainard International Finance, Board of Governors Richard H. Clarida Mary C. Daly Jon Faust, Senior Special Adviser to the Chair, Division Charles L. Evans of Board Members, Board of Governors Randal K. Quarles Christopher J. Waller Joshua Gallin, Special Adviser to the Chair, Division of Board Members, Board of Governors James Bullard, Esther L. George, Naureen Hassan, Loretta J. Mester, and Eric Rosengren, Alternate William F. Bassett, Antulio N. Bomfim, Wendy E. Members of the Federal Open Market Committee Dunn, Burcu Duygan-Bump, Jane E. Ihrig, Kurt F. Lewis, and Chiara Scotti, Special Advisers to the Patrick Harker, Robert S. Kaplan, and Neel Kashkari, Board, Division of Board Members, Board of Presidents of the Federal Reserve Banks of Governors Philadelphia, Dallas, and Minneapolis, respectively Carol C. Bertaut, Senior Associate Director, Division James A.
    [Show full text]
  • The Endowment Effect: Loss Aversion Or a Buy-Sell Discrepancy?
    Journal of Experimental Psychology: General © 2021 American Psychological Association 2020, Vol. 2, No. 999, 000 ISSN: 0096-3445 https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000880 The Endowment Effect: Loss Aversion or a Buy-Sell Discrepancy? Gal Smitizsky1, Wendy Liu1, and Uri Gneezy2 1 Department of Marketing, Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego 2 Department of Economics and Strategy, Rady School of Management, University of California, San Diego In a typical endowment effect experiment, individuals state a higher willingness-to-accept to sell an object than a willingness-to-pay to obtain the object. The leading explanation for the endowment effect is loss aversion for the object. An alternative explanation is based on a buy-sell discrepancy, according to which people price the object in a strategic way. Disentangling these two explanations is the goal of this research. To this end, we introduce a third condition, in which participants receive an object and are asked how much they are willing to pay to keep it (Pay-to-Keep). Comparing the three conditions we find no evidence for loss aversion in the endowment effect setting. We found support for the buy-sell strategy mechanism. Our results have important implications for the understanding of buyer and seller behaviors, subjective value, and elicitation methods. Keywords: endowment effect, loss aversion, buyers versus sellers, utility theory, preference elicitation The endowment effect refers to the observation that “goods that compatible mechanisms, such as price lists, second price auctions, are included in the individual’s endowment will be more highly or the Becker-DeGroot-Marschak paradigm.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning Externalities and Economic Growth
    Learning Externalities and Economic Growth Alejandro M. Rodriguez∗ August 2004 ∗I would like to thank Profesor Robert E. Lucas for motivating me to write this paper and for his helpful comments. Profesor Alvarez also provided some useful insights. Please send comments to [email protected]. All errors are mine. ABSTRACT It is a well known fact that not all countries develop at the same time. The industrial revolution began over 200 years ago in England and has been spreading over the world ever since. In their paper Barriers to Riches, Parente and Prescott notice that countries that enter the industrial stage later on grow faster than what the early starters did. I present a simple model with learning externalities that generates this kind of behavior. I follow Lucas (1998) and solve the optimization problem of the representative agent under the assumption that the external effect is given by the world leader’s human capital. 70 60 50 40 30 20 Number of years to double income 10 0 1820 1840 1860 1880 1900 1920 1940 1960 1980 Year income reached 2,000 (1990 U.S. $) Fig. 1. Growth patterns from Parente and Prescott 1. Introduction In Barriers to Riches, Parente and Prescott observe that ”Countries reaching a given level of income at a later date typically double that level in a shorter time ” To support this conclusion they present Figure 1 Figure 1 shows the year in which a country reached the per capita income level of 2,000 of 1990 U.S. dollars and the number of years it took that country to double its per capita income to 4,000 of 1990 U.S.
    [Show full text]