Lighting Design for Green Areas, in the Study Case of Utterslev Mose

Lighting design for green areas, in the study case of Utterslev Mose

Name Sara Noguera Plans

Supervisor Marc Fontoynont Department of Energy and Environment, Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University

Co-supervisor Nanet Mathiasen Town, housing and property Danish Building Research Institute, Aalborg University Aalborg University Copenhagen

Semester: 4th Aalborg University Copenhagen

Frederikskaj 12, Title: MSC Lighting Design ! !DK-2450 Copenhagen SV Project Period: Spring 2016 (February -May) !Semester Coordinator: ! Secretary: ! ! ! Semester Theme: Abstract: Master thesis ! ! “How to design a lighting system for Utterslev Mose to Supervisor: improve the lighting efficiency while covering citizens ! Marc Fontoynont needs and considering wildlife?” Co-Supervisor: The lighting design for green areas in the study case of Utterslev Mose designs a lighting system and it proposes a Nanet Mathiasen lighting concept for this specific green area. It carries out an ! analysis of the current lighting systems of five green areas Student: from Copenhagen and Fred- eriksberg municipalities. The Sara Noguera Plans analysis’ results are used as a guidance on the design phase ! of this project. The global concept for the design supports nature by enhancing the nature colours in each season and ! bringing an smooth colour transition through the year ! Utterslev Mose will be illumianted with the colour of ! flowers. The lighting system is based on the mentioned ! concept and it consist of an intelligent lighting that sent ! commands to luminaries via wireless transmission. The ! luminaries will change colour through out the year at the ! same speed than seasons. Luminaries are grouped in three ! blocks that correspond the three areas that crate the three ! lakes. ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !

Copyright © 2006. This report and/or appended material may not be partly or completely published or copied without prior written approval from the authors. Neither may the contents be used for commercial purposes without this written approval.! TABLE OF CONTENT

1. Abstract 2. Introduction 2.1. Topic 2.2. Study case 2.3. Purpose 2.4. Statement 3. Metodology 4. Green areas in the study 4.1. Location 4.2. Areas Comparison

5. Primary Data - Methods 5.1. Amagerfælled 5.2 Fælledparken 5.3. Østre Anlæg 5.4. Søndermarken 5.5. Utterslev Mose 5.6. Comparison Technical Measurements 5.7. Conclusion Technical Measurements

6. Design 6.1. Global concept 6.2. Lighting concept 6.3. Implementation 6.4. Light position technique Concept Catalogue - Bollard Concept Catalogue - Mast 6.5. Evaluation 7. Conclusion 8. Future Works 9. Annex 9.1. Survey 9.2. References 9.3 Links

1. ABSTRACT

“How to design a lighting system for Utterslev Mose to improve the lighting efciency while covering citizens needs and considering wildlife?”

The lighting design for green areas in the study case of Utterslev Mose designs a lighting system and it proposes a lighting concept for this specific green area. It carries out an analysis of the current lighting systems of five green areas from Copenhagen and Fred- eriksberg municipalities. The analysis’ results are used as a guidance on the design phase of this project. The global concept for the design supports nature by enhancing the nature colours in each season and bringing an smooth colour transition through the year Utterslev Mose will be illumianted with the colour of flowers. The lighting system is based on the mentioned concept and it consist of an intelligent lighting that sent commands to luminaries via wireless transmission. The luminaries will change colour through out the year at the same speed than seasons. Luminaries are grouped in three blocks that correspond the three areas that crate the three lakes. 2. INTRODUCTION

2.1 Topic

Located in Northern Europe, Copenhagen is recognized as one of the most environ- mentally friendly cities in the world. It is a growing metropolis with an ambitious approach to urban planning and green living. The city aims to become carbon-neutral by 2025, where the city planning, streets and squares, are to be designed to encourage cycling as the fa- voured transport and it boasts large recreational areas.

Nature merges in the city, as the city merges into nature. This harmonic combination can be easily observed from the amount of parks that the city ofers to its inhabitants. King’s Garden (Kongens Have), the garden of Rosenborg Castle, the Botanical Gardens, Fælledparken, Østre Anlæg, Frederiksberg Gardens, Langelinie, etc., and a long list of cem- eteries that copenhageners use as parks. Green areas are considered an important el- ement for the capital, which appoint them as the lungs of the city. Copenhagen promote keeping parks clean and in good conditions in order to invite its citizens to enjoy activities surrounded by nature.

Observing the green areas outside of the metropolitan area, on the surroundings of the city, is possible to ﬁnd a large semi-natural area of lakes, reed beds and parkland called Utterslev Mose. It is located on the border between Gladsaxe and Copenhagen municipality. Utterslev Mose is known for its rich bird life and has a dense network of walking and cycling trails, which thousands of people enjoy every year. It is one of the biggest green areas in Copenhagen municipality.

As a Scandinavian city, the number of daylight hours in Copenhagen varies considerably between summer and winter solstice. This geographical fact challenge the city to not limit its citizens’ activities because of the lack of daylight in winter time. In spite of the municipality’s efort in supplying all their best services to the citizens, still there are some of the mentioned green areas without any type of lighting system, limiting the number of outdoor activities during winter time.

Copenhagen has a Lighting Masterplan “Belysningsmasterplan”(1) which based on the lighting strategy for Copenhagen, “The night in the City of Lights” (2) provide the basis for a major renewal project approved by the City Council in December 2013. Although there is this lighting masterplan, which has detailed improvements for lighting in green areas, there is no plan for a lighting system at Utterlsev Mose. 2.2. Study Case Utterslev Mose

Observing the relationship between green areas and copenhageners, lighting design for green areas became an interesting topic, in order to study how the diferent lighting techniques are used in Copenhagen. This, combined with the lack of lighting system at Ut- ersslev Mose and the Copenhagen interested in achieving a higher engagement between people and nature, made Utersslev Mose an exciting case to study. A lighting system at Utterslev Mose would ofer to its users an extension of the amount of hours that people can practice outdoor activities during winter time. This would increase the quality of life since people is not limited to daylight and they would feel comfortable when walking throughout nature during night time, compare to the existing situation.

2.3. Purpose

The goal of this project is to design an interactive lighting system proposal that it is ef- ﬁcient, consider the wildlife and reinforces people engagement in nature prolonging the amount of hours that citizens can spend in nature during winter time.

The initial idea was to address the lighting design concept with an innovative solution that incorporates new technologies, taking inspiration from Søndermarken (Frederiksberg). Søndermakren combines lighting and technology serving users with an interactive system that gives the possibility to set a running pace to complete the whole route with the desired timing. The system guides runners with ﬂashing light through the whole circuit. A similar solution could be implemented as a playful tool with high potential for this study case, if the qualitative research indicates this type of technology is relevant in green areas.

The lighting system should follow an organic design and create an atmosphere according to the space. The main goal is to encourage people to use green areas and appreciate nature. Furthermore, this lighting design would help in the process of leading cycling as the main transport by 2025, by ofering facilities to walk and bike through Utterslev Mose paths while creating an enjoyable atmosphere to copenhageners.

2.4. Statement

Considering what is mentioned in the previous sections, the following statement was set. The study of the existing lighting techniques in green areas of the city of Copenhagen, can guide to:

How to design a lighting system for Utterslev Mose to improve the lighting efciency while covering citizens needs and considering wildlife? 3. METHODOLOGY

In this section it is explained the procedure that this study will follow in order to approach the statement formulated in the Statement section. (2.4 Statement)

The study will be divided in a primary data collection, which will content a qualitative and quantitative research made on-side, to gather information from each of the green areas to study. From there, a lighting system will be design for Utterslev Mose.

The primary data collection encloses a qualitative research following an opinion based research method where, throughout a survey in each green area, people will provide information about their feelings and thoughts about the lighting system. Moreover a quantitative research based on reporting method will completed the primary data block with photography report and lighting measurements.

Previous to design phase, it is necessary to gather information from existing lighting system in green areas to study the diferent lighting techniques used inside the Storkøbenhavn areal. This technical information will contemplate the type of source, type of luminaries, the distance between each ﬁxture, power consumption, efciency and the Lux measurements that luminaries provide during night time on horizontal axis, the ground surface, and on vertical axis, on a height that can simulate people’s faces. The analyses of that information together with a photographic report, for obtaining visual information of the context, it should give as a result the characteristics of an efcient lighting technique for the design phase.

The results from the analyses of the primary data will be the tools to guide the lighting design for Ut- terslev Mose. 4. GREEN AREAS IN THE STUDY

Previous to the information gathered through out the methods mentioned in the previous section, a breve introduction will show the location and it will explain the similarities of the areas selected.

The list of the green areas where primary data collection will take place is: Amagerfælled, Fælledparken, Østre Anlæg, Søndermarken and Utterslev Mose. The decision of the selected areas Figure 2. Municipalities of Copenhagen and Frederiksberg. to study is based on the similar features of each area to Utterselv Mose and , furthermore, it also consider green areas that use new technologies like interactive lighting system, as Søndermarken. The number of parks is limited to 5 due the limited time up to 3 months to carry out the project and the amount of green areas in the city. (Figure 1: Areas location)

4.1 Location

The green areas studied in this project are located inside Copenhagen municipality, except Søndermarken which is under Frederiksberg area. (See Figure 2) The reason why it was decided to include it in the project was due its innovative and interactive lighting system, which could be a relevant inﬂuence in the ﬁnal design for Utterslev Mose lighting system. (Information about the interactive system in secction 5.4 Søndermarken)

1 1 Amagerfælled 2 Fælledparken 3 Østre Anlæg 4 Søndermarken 5 Utterslev Mose

Figure 1. Location of the green areas 4.2 Areas Comparison

The green areas of this study were selected in the early steps following four parameters: location, wildlife, activities and innovative technology.

Utterslev Mose is a green semi-natural area located on the surrounding of the city at the border of Copenhagen municipality. Following the same peculiarity of being located outside of the city, Amagerfælled was selected to be part of the project. Comparing this area with Utterslev Mose, it is also rich in wildlife and have similar dimensions.

Fælledparken and Østre Anlæg were selected in order to compare if there is used a diferent lighting technique when green areas are located at the inner city or outside of the city. Another feature that Fælledparken share with Utterslev Mose is a high ﬂow of users practicing several sports as: running, soccer training, matches on the courts marked on the grass, playgrounds, as well as being an area with a high variety of animals and plans. For example, the nature in Fælledparked is characterized for having approximately 200 marsh frogs (Figure 3)

The interactive lighting system that ofers Søndermarken makes from it a green area to refer when approaching the lighting design for Utterslev Mose using new technologies and attracting users.

Location Wildlife

Activities Technology

Figure 3. Features for selection of areas 5. PRIMARY DATA

This chapter collects the methods used in this study to gather information through a qualitative and quantitative research. (See ﬁgure 4)

As previously mentioned on section Meth- odology (see 3.Methodoogy of this study) the qualitative research it is done individually for each green area following an opinion based research and a photographic report. Figure 4. Primary data division

A side of the qualitative research, a quantitative research and its analyses complete the primary data of this chapter by taking technical measurements on side.

5.1. METHODS

This section explains the speciﬁc methods by which the research data is collected and the speciﬁc research techniques that will be used to answer the problem formulation statement.

QUALITATIVE RESEARCH

The qualitative research will allow to obtain an overview of the context of each green area and the opinion of the users regarding facilities, lighting system and what they think that can be improved. A photographic report of each area, in conjunction with a survey on-side, will allow to gather all this information.

The unavailability of a camera machine and an overbooking on the equipment from the Aalborg University booking system, leaded the author of this study to carry out the photographic report by using the camera of an Iphone 6. Using this solution it will allowed to record videos at each green area in order to produce, in a future steps, the video required on the thesis speciﬁcation hand-in document. The technical speciﬁcations can be seen in Table 1.(Table 1. Camera and video characteristics)

Camera characteristics: Video characteristics:

ƒ/2.2 aperture 1080p HD video recording (30 fps or 60 fps) HDR image Slo-mo video (120 fps or 240 fps) 8-megapixel iSight camera with 1.5µ pixels Time-lapse video with stabilization Exposure control Cinematic video stabilization Panorama (up to 43 megapixels) Continuous autofocus video 3x zoom

Table 1. Camera and video characteristics In order to complete the qualitative research, 30 users from each green area will be asked to ﬁll up a survey questionnaire using SurveyMonkey platform [1]. The survey target group is people that had been in the area at least once and they can contribute with real and valuable information when approaching the problem formulation. (See Annex1.Survey Questionnaire)

The survey answers will be analysed statistically to ﬁgure out the main user of each area. Furthermore, from the results it will be collected a list of excising problems and improvements according to people’s opinion. This information can be used as a design tool when designing the lighting system for Utterslev Mose.

QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

The quantitative research will complement the previous material with technical information of type of source, type of luminaries, distance between ﬁxtures, power consumption, efciency and Lux measurements on horizontal axis, on ground level, and on vertical axis, on a height of 1.75 (the average height of Danish citizens). This data will let to analyse the diferent lighting techniques used by observing how the distance between luminaries, height and intensity, efects on the lighting distribution to ﬁgure out which technique can ofer a better solution for the Utterslev Mose lighting design.

The qualitative and quantitative research should concede a basis for an efcient lighting technique that cover users’ needs and guide the design to create an atmosphere according to the context.

PROCEDURE

The next pages present the qualitative and quantitative research with a brief introduction for each green area. Following each introduction there is a photographic report and a survey’s analyses. The information is completed with the technical measurements which are analysed in diagrams. To analysis end with a technical sheet summing up the relevant information from each area and a table to compare all the diferent luminaries and techniques. Old coastline Path Cycling-pedestrian path 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Camp fire Lakes andfish Hills Model aircraftzone Soccer Forest Inula salicinameadow Plants Clones Horses Hills higherzone Allotment Bonfire andbarbecuearea Parking zone 7 the pathtypesandcuriositiesofarea. specifies Furthermore,6).It (Figure activity each for the map of the green area and located on shows it the zones image following The hiking. and games ball cling, horse riding, fishing, berry picking, sunbathing, cy biking, BMX flying, model hang-gliding,bonfires, range of activities: outdoor pursuits, running, picnics, wide a practice can people where ha 223 for counts ac Figure5).It district.(See Amager in Copenhagen Amagerfælled is a green area located on the south of 5.1 AMAGERFÆLLED Kal Sjællandsb v ebod

Fælled V r ejlands oen 8

Allé bane c Moto- r Planlagt oss-

bane Speedw sti V and hjem Met Til a y- r

er- Sund r ostation b HF y

Sønderb

5 Losseplads r 5 o

v r ej estad 8 7 200 Figure 6. MapoftheAmagerælled

m Nok 3 k en 2 Old coastline Path Cycling-pedestrian path 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Camp fire Lakes andfish Hills Model aircraftzone Soccer Forest Inula salicinameadow Plants Clones Horses 6 9 6 - - Met Til

Uni r ostation v ersitetet 1 Hills higherzone Allotment Bonfire andbarbecuearea Parking zone

7 iue . re zn rees o Am to reefers zone agerfælled location in the Copenhagen areal Green 5. Figure

r tilleri HF

B ej r yggen 1 4 HF

Old coastline Path Cycling-pedestrian path

Faste

9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1

Ballonpar

A Camp fire Lakes andfish Hills Model aircraftzone Soccer Forest Inula salicinameadow Plants Clones Horses Batteri

tilleri

k ej en Njalsgade Islands

B r ygge N Kal Sjællandsb -

ebod

D ÆLLE F GER A M A Fælled Hills higherzone Allotment Bonfire andbarbecuearea Parking zone 7 V r ejlands oen 8

Allé bane c Moto- r Planlagt oss-

AMAGERFÆLLED bane Speedw sti

andV

hjem Met Til a y- r

er- Sund r ostation b HF y

Sønderb

5 Losseplads r 5 o

v r ej estad 8 Kal Sjællandsb v ebod 7 200

Fælled

V r m ejlands oen 8

Allé bane c Moto- Nok r Planlagt oss- 3 k en

bane Speedw sti 2 V and hjem Met Til a y- r

er- Sund r ostation 6 b HF y 9

Sønderb

5 Losseplads r 5 o 6 Met Til

Uni Ø

r v

ostation r ej estad v ersitetet 8 1

r 200 tilleri HF

B ej r yggen Nok 3 k en 2 1 4 HF 6

Faste

Ballonpar

Batteri A

tilleri

6 k ej en Met Til

Njalsgade Uni r ostation Islands v ersitetet

B r ygge N

tilleri

D ÆLLE F GER A M HF A

B ej r yggen 1 4 HF

Faste

Ballonpar

Batteri A

tilleri

k ej en Njalsgade Islands

r ygge N

D ÆLLE F GER A M A AMAGERFÆLLED 3 1 photographic report Figure 7. Route ofthephotographic report

4 2 /Qualitative Research

AMAGERFÆLLED 11 9 7 5 12 10 8 6

AMAGERFÆLLED 16 15 14 13

AMAGERFÆLLED people touseitduringnighttime(seepicture 14) helping people to do their tasks ,as for example the grill area, which currently it not for relevantenabled be could system lighting a where area the in zones However,some are there shown inred lineonthemapinFigure 6). (paths paths main the including system, lighting any present park the of paths inner the trathe on greenarea.lighting whole Eventhereis the in During the process of undertaking pictures at Amagerfælled no lighting system was found LIGHTING SYSTEM (See Picture 16onthephotographic report) a feeling of careless, including the art installation which shows a deteriorated appearance. colourful structure. Even this installation is part of the area , the surroundings of it leads to the enhancing roof the up lit ground the from lights time night day,during sunny and a in di in ground the paints glas colored handblown mounted lead with roof a instalation from the artist Bjørn Nørgaardcareless. It is a circular artiﬁcial structure where the photographic report. or chill around the place and it can be perceived on pictures number 4 and number 8 from walk to people inviting naturenot treesaround.and is some emptiness impressionof The the place. area. Carrying out the photographic report it also allowed to observe how users experience The expedition to Amagerfælled permit to experience the feelings when being in the green EXPERIENCE AMAGERFÆLLED ANALYSES - Ifthere isany artorsculpture inthe zone, make itpartofthegreen area. - Itisinteresting to enhancenature. - Avoid acareless feeling in the area. RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: accommodates Furthermore,Amagerfælled areaempty,huge quite a wherelook is zones It some missing of sensation a giving photographic report Island of Love of Island f c roads around the area,of roadsaroundthe non c - /Qualitative Research Kærlighedsøen f erent colours erent , an art an ,

AMAGERFÆLLED some citizensexpressed desire for betterillumination ofthepathconnections. nature.However experience to place a and biodiversity its due pollution light to nerability To conclude the survey analyses, Amagerfælled can be described as an area with high vul well as, ahighdemandonincreasing theplaygrounds for kids. as vegetation, more demanding area the of appearance the and nature on focus also ple when crossing the area or increase the hours that they can go there for a walk. Some peo work to journey they facilitate will it system,since lighting a for demand them of majority the and areagreen the to going when daylight the of dependence strong an have to seem Regarding the open questions about inputs for improving the area and observations, users that itmustbeanenjoyable tool. about the existence of the interactive lighting system in Søndermarken, however they think know not do users the of majority The time. night during feeling unsafe and lighting poor a on coincide them of all since conditions lighting the due be can that fact 3pm, and 8am time,areadaybetween speciallythe during use mainly people how resultsshow The also week. The major activity per is times walking, 2 followed or by week people per who times likes 4 running either in of the frequency green a area.with old years 44 and 35 between the of area. Fromusers the results its possible to observe that the main fromgroup using the area is people information relevant obtain to order in helpful was survey a Carrying AMAGERFÆLLED ANALYSES Questions ofthesurvey can befound atchapter9.1Survey Questionaire the area were takingasurvey of10questionswith2openquestions. A survey was carried out on the 7th and 8th of march of 2016 at Amagerfælled. Users from AMAGERFÆLLED - Playgrounds for kidsare indemand. - Nolightingleadpeopletofeel unsafe inthearea, usingitonly during day time. - People like to usetheparkchill andrunning. RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: Survey Survey

/Qualitative Research - -

AMAGERFÆLLED wildlife. The following imagesshow theoutlineoflightingsystem. temperature in order to minimize the impact in nature since this area host a wide range of the dimensions of the park, the plan speciﬁes that the luminaries will use a reddish colour Due luminaries.bollards with pedestrians and cyclist guide will it and area the cross that for system Amagerfælled. lighting According to a the plan, consider an asymmetric lighting [2] system will Copenhagen lit the main of paths Masterplan Lighting the Nonetheless, research will betaken intoaccountfor furtherstepsinthedesignprocess. area.However,this research for quantitative invalid qualitative an the leading ignored are Due the absence of lighting in Amagerfælled the lighting measurements of this green area AMAGERFÆLLED technical measurements

/Quantitative Research

AMAGERFÆLLED located onitthezonesfor eachactivity. and areagreen the of map the shows 9) (Figure age im carnival.following as The celebrationssuch and concerts sunbathing, grass, the on marked courts walking, like: running,the picnics,on training Fælledparkenmatches soccer and at activities of range on its 58ha of green area. People can practice a wide of Copenahgen(SeeFigure 8). The parkhasanoasis Fælledparken is a green area located in the inner city 5.2 FÆLLEDPARKEN Figure 9. MapofFælledparken - iue . re zn rees o Am to reefers zone agerfælled location in the Copenhagen areal Green 8. Figure -

FÆLLEDPARKEN FÆLLEDPARKEN 3 1 photographic report Figure 10. Route ofthephotographic report

4 2 /Qualitative Research

FÆLLEDPARKEN 11 9 7 5 12 10 8 6

FÆLLEDPARKEN 16 15 14 13

FÆLLEDPARKEN

and 14) 5 photography (see playgrounds. the of some as well as report),photographic the on 13 transversalthe paths, currentlywhich presentnot do system.lighting a photographysee ( example for users,as relevantfor be could it extraluminaries locate to wherearea the in Although the lighting system follows the mentioned lighting strategy, there are some zones ings. to focus the lighting on pathways avoiding that the light distribution reaches the surround keeping dark zones and not lighting all of the paths. The usage of bollard luminaires permit The lighting combines bollard and mast luminaires and Its strategy perseveres the wildlife team istraining. football a if court football a example for as required, is it when zones is specific in there Furthermore,lighting time. night during area the around walk to citizens to chance the give which bollards, using pathways peripheral the covers lighting The lightened. is area The photographic report of Fælledparken allowed to observe in a first sight, how the green LIGHTING SYSTEM ride innature. late a having is who to feeling comfortable a gives and lookssafe still time,park night the is It though Even area. the covers silence the and quiet becomes Fælledparkennight, At disconnect from thecity. to areas cosy find can still people dimensions, considerable of area green a is it though, Even plans. and animals ages, all from citizens about care take which design, Its is good When citizens are in the park, they can easily see how the city hall takes care of It and how penhageners tofindinitaplacefor awiderange ofactivities. co to permits dimensions Its peaceful. is time same the city,at the but in is It course, of city and you can easily experience it when you walk through its paths. There is movement, inner the in park Fælledparkensection,a this is of introduction the at mention parken.As Fælleddefine This place. taking matches football side, other the on chilling, and walking Movement and action, at the same time that there is calm and silence. On one side, people EXPERIENCE FÆLLEDPARKEN ANALYSES - Leave areas withoutlightingtopreserve wildlife. - Usageofdi - The lightingincrease thesafety feeling atnight. - The combinationofactive andchill areas adddynamism tothepark RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: f erent typeofluminaries dependingonfunction photographic report /Qualitative Research - - -

FÆLLEDPARKEN in thearea. ﬂowers and plants of type the on variety more demanding naturein on focus Amagerfælled as people, Some drinking. for places and toilets of is amount It the that improve think to they important but , city the for good really is that and possibilities of range wide a o park the that pointing were Users running. is who people for enough good not is it of quality the lighting thereregisteredis wasthough Fromeven it that questions open the two timessincethey ﬁnditagoodtooltoimprove theirtrainings. Søndermarken.in lighting intelligent an existenceof However, moreit used only10% than the about knew survey the took who people the of 70% lighting,interactive the Regarding lighting system intheparkopenmore possibilitiestocitizens. a who time, night during users of percentage the increase to allow park the averageweek.an systemthreein per with lighting times park The of the to go users and The time of the day when the park is used in a higher frequency is between 3pm and 6pm, park for runningandtraining. the use that percentage high a is there but park, the use ages is all from People even.percentage quite the since group, user age main clear a not is there that show results The FÆLLEDPARKEN ANALYSES For thequestionnaire seechapter9.1.Survey the area were takingasurvey of10questionswith2openinit. Fælledparken.at 2016 of Usersof march of 10th and 9th the on out carried was survey A FÆLLEDPARKEN - People like biodiversity. - The lightingallow citizenstoenjoy nature atnight. - Agoodpublicparkmustbedesignedfor peoplefrom all ages. RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: Survey Survey

/Qualitative Research f rm that the that rm f ers

FÆLLEDPARKEN surroundings inorder topreserve thewildlife. bollards luminaires, ,which focus the lighting distribution on the pathway avoiding to lit the of This type of luminaire are in the Copenhagen Lighting Masterplan under the category class the entrance at inviting people light to come into of the park, amount at the the same time increasethat make which them feel luminaries,safety mast placed are there park the of di Fælledparkenuse LUMINAIRES cated. Aposteriori, illuminance measurements are visualizedandanalysed by diagrams. lo are where speciﬁes it and Fælledparken in used luminaries the present section This FÆLLEDPARKEN while litpassageways meethumanactivity. wildlife meet passages Dark area. the of users many the accommodate lifecycle Ruptured Residential and Pedestrian [2] Pedestrian and Residential FÆLEDPARKEN technical measurements f erent lighting for di for lighting erent Figure 11. Fælledparken lighting opportunity slow adaptation. opportunity and light zones give theeye the Gradual transitions between dark . However to lit the surrounding pathway It was choosen was It pathway surrounding the lit to However . f

erent functions. For example, at the entrances the at example, For functions. erent nocturnal animals nocturnal zones ensures passenger for Unilluminated contiguous /Quantitative Research in the dark hours in thedark Light onthefront invite for use + & % , " -. - / " $ # " ' & 0 1 % # -) 2 3 0) 4 5 + & - 6 # 7 -)))*) - ? <

FÆLLEDPARKEN TYPE OFLUMINARIES Philips Park armature Figure 12. Mapofthepositionluminaires inFælledparken ﬂoor washing. ERCO Panorama IP65 Uplight Accent lighitng LEGEND Projector Uplight Bollard Ercoluminaire Park armature /Quantitative Research sport courts. downward spotlighting, High mastswith

FÆLLEDPARKEN FÆLLEDPARKEN 1 metns were taken Figrue 14. Photo ofthebollard luminaires where measure ERCO Panorama IP65ﬂoorwashing. ZONE 1 Figure 13. Zones ofluxmeasurement Luxmeasurements - 2 22th and23thofMarch at20:00. The measurements were taken on luminaires isplaced ineachzone. ures 14and15show whichtypeof measurements were taken. The ﬁg in Fælledparken, where illuminance The mapontheleftshows thezones mast luminaire are located. Figrue 15. Photo ofoneentrance tothe parkwere Philips PHILIPS Park Armature ZONE 2 /Qualitative Research - -

FÆLLEDPARKEN ELEVATION A -LuxmeterpointingL1 PLAN VISUALIZATION OFZONE1 ELEVATION A-LuxmeterpointingL2 ELEVATIONS A-A’ ANDB-B’ 1750 mm 5.000 mm 1750 mm 1123 mm 500 mm 1123 mm L1 L1 L1 1 5 40 1 4 8 16 38 65 86 98 122 89 500 mm 500 6 2 65 7 1 97 7 1 88 6 1 76 6 1 65 5 1 55

5 1 34 4 1 15 4 1 6 4 1 4 3 1 3 3 1 2 2 1 2 A 2 1 1 15.000 mm 15.000 1 1 1 1 1 1 L1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 2 1 2 5 1 3 10 1 3 20 1 3 53 B 1 3 58 1 4 68 L2 1 5 80 1 7 106 1 9 107 A’ 2 7 36 L2 L2 L2 2 4 45 1 3 7 17 37 53 90 91 121 79 B’ ELEVATION B-Luxmeterdirection B’-B ELEVATION B-Luxmeterdirection B-B’ B B 3 0 2.000 mm 2.000 3 0 4 1 3 3 L2 L2 2 2 1000 mm 3 2 7.000 mm 7.000 LEGEND L2 L1 u 3 2 2 2 Scale Top viewofluminaire Luminaire 2 Luminaire 1 Units inLux direction Luxmeter facingonthearrow direction Luxmeter facingonthearrow 2 3 5.000 mm 5.000 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 0 2 B’ B’ 0 2 FÆLLEDPARKEN Luminaire Techinical Data Measurement zonesinFælledparken areal IP65 Floorwashing ERCO PANORAMA Light Distribution Lux measurements Dimentions LED source ent levels thatmeasurements were taken. (Level 0:ground floor;Level 1:heightof1,75m) A’-Arespectively. di two the in figurefollowingand shows,elevations The studied the evation AA’- direction A to A’ and direction A’ to A. The project refers to each one as A-A’ and 16. For each elevation lux measurements were taken in two directions, as for example: El The lux measurements at Zone 1 were taken in two di / ZONE1-ERCO Panorama IP65 bollards are located anditcontinuesatZone 2withtheanalyses ofthePhilipsPark. The analyses of lighting measurements starts with the lux values at Zone 1 were the ERCO FÆLLEDPARKEN ANALYSIS Luxmeasurements Figure 18. Zone 1Elevations andheight Figure 17. Zone 1Elevations f erent elevations as shown on figure

/Quantitative Research f er - -

FÆLLEDPARKEN H=1,75m taken onthevertical axis. of height 1,AA’ level elevation in to corresponddiagrams next on measurements lux The Elevation AA’ / ZONE1-ERCO Panorama IP65 FACE level Figure 19. Elevation AA’

5 L1 6 1 2 7 Visualization onelevation AA’ 1 7 1 6 1 6 1 5 1 5 1 4 1 ELEVATION A-LuxmeterpointingL1 4 1 ELEVATION A-LuxmeterpointingL2 4 1 3 1 3 /Quantitative Research 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 4 1 5 1 7 1 9 1 7

L2 2

4 2

A’-A Direction A’-A Direction A-A’

FÆLLEDPARKEN sponds toaplanonheightofH=1,75mandtaken onthevertical axis. corre that 1, level in BB’ elevation at taken arediagrams next on measurements lux The Elevation BB’ / ZONE1-PHILIPSCITYSWAN BOLLARD FACE level Figure 20. Zone 1Elevation BB’

B B Visualization onelevation BB’ 3 ELEVATION B-Luxmeteronthedirection B-B’ 0 3 ELEVATION B-Luxmeteronthedirection B’-B 0 4 1 3 3 2 2 3 /Quantitative Research 2 3 2 2 2 2 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1 3 2 0 B’ B’ 2 0

B’-B Direction B’-B Direction B-B’

FÆLLEDPARKEN - Rightopticfor therightdesign zone. - Findanopticsthatkeeps thehighestlux values onthepathzoneandnotback surfacehave aninfluenceonthevaluesluxmeter’s aspart ofbias. less intensity a longer distance. Moreover, there is a possibility that light reflections on the However at the same height and at 4meters ditance of the L2 values start to decrease due metersfirst the increaseat valuesto leads luminairethat the of optics the due be could it luminaire the of meters 2 after increase direction B-B’ on values lux the why reason The at 1Lux. (Diagrams ofprevious page. ) curve where between 2m from L2 until 4meters from L2 there is an straight horizontal line diagramlux.the 1 on at meterscannoticed wherestay 2 fact be measurments is This the there that, Beforeluminaire. the from 4-5m at zone path the on direction, B-B’ the on lux zero registered is there hand, other the On side. back the on luminare the from distance show that It happens exactly the opposite. The highest measurement is register at 1 meter resultscase this wildlife,in in impact the minimize surroundingto the lit to path,avoiding Although,the strategyon light parkslight the in focusthe hall to city is Copenhagen the of were value reach 4lux. naire, and this happen in a distance of 1 meter from the L2 on the back zone of the bollard, lumi the to faced is luxmeter the AA’.when elevationregistered are in values as Highest Observing the values on elevation BB’, results show that it keeps following the same patter Elevation BB’ luminaries. Light distributionismainly around 2-3lux, onmeasurementsbetween pointingluminaries. meters 15 the in lux 0 registered been has directions the of non In nance, spots on the di 1 to 9 lux for A-A’, and 1 to 7 for A’-A. The di facing the luminaire, and this happen in both cases A-A’ and A’-A. The Lux range goes from Observing the results, It is evident that highest values are registered when the luxmeter is Elevation AA’ RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: f user of the luminaire, the material used to take measurements, etc. f erences on values can be due bias as: mainte /Quantitative Research - -

FÆLLEDPARKEN ELEVATION CC’-Luxmeterdirection C’-C VISUALIZATION OFZONE2 ELEVATIONS C-C’ANDD-D’ ELEVATION CC’-Luxmeterdirection C-C’ C C 14 78 14 5 17 90 17 5 2.000 mm 2.000 20 95 20 6 20 58 20 5 L4 L4 78 25 78 56 63 93 93 5 97 94 94 6 86 92 5 86 82 79 5 82

9.000 mm 9.000 56 60 3 56 45 46 2 46 7.000 mm 7.000 35 36 2 35 30 28 1 30 23 23 0 23 C’ C’ 17 18 0 17 13 16 0 13 D 10 13 10 0 7 11 7 0 0 6 9 6 L3

1750 mm

4.000 mm C L4 D’ C’ 1000 mm LEGEND L2 L1 u Scale Top viewofluminaire Luminaire 2 Luminaire 1 Units inLux direction Luxmeter facingonthearrow direction Luxmeter facingonthearrow Luminaire Techinical Data Measurement zonesinFælledparken areal FÆLLEDPARKEN Dimentions PHILIPS PARK ARMATURE Light Distribution Lux measurements LED source VISUALIZATION OFZONE2 ELEVATIONS C-C’ANDD-D’ ELEVATION DD -Luxmeterdirection D’-D PLAN VIEW ELEVATION DD’-Luxmeterdirection D-D’ L3 L3 L3 94 6 9 15 19 26 29 41 52 67 74 79 90 87 94 13 94 13 4 100 100 70 100 6 99 99 97 99 6 87 87 102 87 5 81 81 97 81 5 70 70 75 70 4

55 55 3 55 66 46 46 48 46 3 33 33 40 33 3 26 3 26 30 26 22 22 24 22 2 17 17 20 17 2 12 12 17 12 2 D 10 10 13 10 3 9 9 11 9 3 7 7 10 7 3 L3 5 5 8 5 3 4 3 4 7 4 4 3 4 6 4 3 3 3 5 3 3 4 3 4 3 2 2 4 2 4 2 3 2 3 2 C 2 4 2 3 2 2 4 2 3 2 L4 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 5 2 2 2 2 6 D’ 2 2 2 2 6 3 1 6 3 3 3 1 7 3 3 3 3 1 3 7 C’ 4 4 1 4 8 4 4 1 4 9 4 4 1 4 10 5 5 1 5 11 6 6 1 6 12 7 7 0 7 13 8 8 0 8 14 9 0 15 9 9 11 0 18 11 11 14 1 21 14 14 16 1 27 16 16 20 1 29 20 20 25 25 1 25 36 33 33 1 33 43 39 39 2 39 54 49 49 49 2 65 63 63 63 2 79 81 81 81 2 97 100 100 100 3 126 120 120 120 3 156 137 137 4 137 192 156 156 5 156 247 169 169 169 6 244 FÆLLEDPARKEN 164 164 164 9 199 L4 L4 L4 166 166 166 8 8 35 82 86 94 93 6 7 10 13 17 23 30 46 56

4.000 mm 1750 mm 1000 mm LEGEND L2 L1 u Lux measurements Scale Top viewofluminaire Luminaire 2 Luminaire 1 Units inLux direction Luxmeter facingonthearrow direction Luxmeter facingonthearrow urements were taken. (Level 0:ground ﬂoor;Level 1:height of 1,75m) The following ﬁgure shows, the studied elevations and in the two di urements were registered for eachelevation intwodirections (C-C’, C’-C, D-D’, andD’-D, ) The lux measurements at zone two were taken the same procedure as in zone one. Meas / ZONE2-PHILIPSPARK BASIC Figure 21. Zone 2Elevation CC’ Figure 22. Zone 2Elevations /Quantitative Research f erent levels that meas - -

FÆLLEDPARKEN urements were registered for eachelevation intwodirections (C-C’, C’-C, D-D’, andD’-D, ) The lux measurements at zone two were taken the same procedure as in zone one. Meas Elevation CC’ / ZONE2-PHILIPSCITYSWAN BASIC FACE level Figure 23. Zone 2Elevation CC’Level 1

C Visualization onelevation CC’ C 14 5 17 5 78 14 90 17 20 6 95 20 20 5 L4 ELEVATION B-Luxmeterdirection C-C’ 58 20 ELEVATION B-Luxmeterdirection C’-C 78 56 L4 78 25 93 63 93 5 94 97 /Quantitative Research 94 6 86 92 5 86 82 79 5 82 56 60 3 56 46 45 2 46 35 36 2 35 30 28 1 30 23 23 0 23 C’ 17 18 C’ 0 17 13 16 0 13 10 13 10 0 7 11 7 0 6 9 6 0

C’-C Direction C’-C Direction C-C’

FÆLLEDPARKEN The next diagrams show theilluminance measurements from elevation D-D’, andD’-D. Face level Figure 23. Zone 2Elevations DD’level 1 Visualization onelevation DD’

/Quantitative Research

D’-D Direction D’-D Direction D-D’

FÆLLEDPARKEN 102lux. This di di between directionssignificant DD’ or D’D. a The highest value is registerhas on L4 with 247lux and for It L3 is luminaire, same the due value same the around practically be should measurements Even-tough lux. 247 to 0 form is range values DD’ elevation On Elevation DD’ important toconcentrate thelightover thepathandnotonsurroundings. elevation CC ‘ , which in some cases the it can be evaluated as a non desireto situation since it is distribution light symmetric a brings Park Philips luminare the of optics ever,the position.that at How face the on lux 9 overtime, amount night an receivedleast would at 9lux on the pathwayover at height of 1.75m, meaning that illuminances everyone walking on the path during gives luminaire the that conclude can elevation this from results The of theluminare. FIgure 24shows bothdiagrams inone. Looking at both directions, it is possible to deduct the overall curve of the light distribution exception at1meterdistancefrom theL4, were theluxmeasurement is6units. an is there However meters. 2 next the for line horizontal an in stay to 5 to down go ues val lux the zone, back the into gets luxmeter the breakdown.When a is there length that at where distance, meter 1 at until graduallyincrease values The lux. 9 over value a with goes from C-C’ 0to95lux, whileontheC’-C5to97lux. direction the in range values The direction. opposite the on facing is luminare the when taken are which path, the on values the with comparison diagram,in the on curve luminare is facing the L4 and it accentuate the the when taken are zone back the on ments measure the case, this In direction. opposite the luxmeter is facing the luminare or is in the di significant a is there that clear is It pages, previous the on C-C’ direction the on diagram the at Looking Elevation CC’ on theluxmeasurments ofthetwoelevations. - PhilipsPark use47W andgives anaverage of26luxataheight of1.75m, based - Maintenancehasabiginfluence - Definethelightdistributiondesired, thenfindtherightluminaire RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: path the of width whole the covers curve distribution lux the direction C’-C the On f f erence couldbeto maintenanceoftheluminaire. erence between values when values between erence - Figrue 22. Diagram curve ofLux/meter over theElevationCC’ /Quantitative Research f erent

- -

FÆLLEDPARKEN Next diagrams present theluxmeasurmentstaken atZone 2onground level. GROUND Level GROUND level Figure 24. Zone 2 Elevations on Ground level Visualization onelevation

/Quantitative Research

ELEVATION DD’ ELEVATION CC’ ELEVATION

FÆLLEDPARKEN in between 2 and 169lux. There has no been registered zero lux in the 28m between poles. bution of the Luminaire Philips Parks is in a symmetric radial expansion. Lights values are From the graphics Lux/meter on the ground level Its possible to detect that the light distri GROUND Level conclusion minimum of2luxbetween poles. - Using 47W the illuminance average ofthe twoaxis on ground level is61 lx, with a - Philipsparkgives asymmetric lightdistributiononground level. RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: /Quantitative Research -

FÆLLEDPARKEN tribution. dis light of 360º a with found be canluminaire However, same Websitethe Philips the on park. the for especially made was optic employed The luminaire. the of zone back the on The ERCO Panorama IP65, use an optic that it distributes the light in 180º to avoid the light to amastlumianire. However for widerpathsItcan bemore interesting tousehighpoles. compare wildlife in impact the lessening path a lit to permits areas,greenwhich in paths a space aerial of amount source,the the is placed bigger respectively,is higher the that conclude to lead 2 Zone and 1 Zone at luminaire mast Philips and bollard ERCO of urments meas lux the of height.comparison lower fromThe a is distribution light the since surroundingspaths the on bollards using by minimized is nature in percussion the Moreover, wildlife respecting nature andconservingdarknessattherest ofthegreen area. thermore, lighting the park only in specific zones and pathways, it minimized the impact in Fur activities. human for park the of quality the increase to functionality required the on di Fælledparkenstrategyusing of light in The consist CONCLUSION FÆLLEDPARKEN lightingmeasurments f ected by the light. This evidence prioritize the usage of a bollard system when lighting when system bollard a of usage the prioritize evidence This light. the by ected ground is61ls, withaminimumof2lux. - Using47W per luminaire inadistanceof28meters, theaverage illuminance on - Philipsparkgives asymmetric lightdistributiononground level. - PhilipsPark use 47W andgives anaverage luxof26luxataheight1.75m - Maintenancehasabiginfluence - Definethelightdistributiondesired, thenfindtherightluminaire SUM UPRELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: f erent type of luminaries depending luminaries of erenttype /Quantitative Research - - -

FÆLLEDPARKEN activities. The following image (Figure 26) shows the map of the green area and locates the di grounds. play there ﬁnd or sunbathing basketball, grill, nics, where city pic running, walking, inner as activities practice can they the in zone a copenhageners to o Anlæg ØstreFælledparken, or Amagerfælled to compare area, green smaller a is it though, Even system. moat the of part be to used which and area green the of 2,4ha cover that park the in lakesthree are There Figure.25). (See Copenahgen of city inner the in located fortiﬁcations city old the of that part was hectares 12,4 of area green a is Anlæg Østre 5.3 ØSTRE ANLÆG

100 N

m Sølvto r v Sølvgade et Brandes Georg B

Plads 1 1 6 Statens 5

Museum Hirschsprungs

f or Samling

Den K 8 unst k e Figure 26. MapofØstre Anglæg 2 Quitz

Øster R o 7 a ws v elin 6 5 4 3 2 1 V G oldgade The BirdFriendlyPark Bats Birkelunden Pückler’s Bastion Lake -theoldmoat The bastionsVoldsystem 1 A 0 1 1 6 Stockholmsgade 1 9 2 f G Pücklers F ers 1 1 B 3 1 7 9

Bastion - - F G 12 11 10 9 8 7 Wild tulips Ivy Black walnut Turkish Hassel Cercidiphyllum Bregnebøgen 1 8 Püchlers 1 R 4 lægd location An intheCopenhagenareal Østre to reefers zone Green 25. Figure a v elin 1 1 8 4 1 3 /Qualitative Research C A G D B E F 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 Playing field T Grill Tables Handicap toilet Playground /playplace Staffed playground(weekdaysat.9-17) Sophus Bauditz Boy withchicks Denmark Monument oilets Elme sculptures The museumgarden Rose Haven Rhododendron garden 6 E 5 D Rosenkrantz Spidsen C 1

af 1

G Basion F 1 6 f erent Oslo

Plads -

ØSTRE ANLÆG ØSTRE ANLÆG 3 1 photographic report Figure 27. Route of the photographic report at Østre Anlæg

4 2 /Qualitative Research

ØSTRE ANLÆG 11 9 7 5 12 10 8 6

ØSTRE ANLÆG 16 15 14 13

ØSTRE ANLÆG improve thegreen area, itdoesnotincludealightingsystem. to plan a is there [3] Conservation Nature for Society Denmark’s to according , Although ity. The area becomes quiteandscary. night time darkness covers the whole area and it becomes impracticable any type of activ At area. the in system lighting no is there that observe to allowed Anlæg Øster Exploring report onthe16thofApril. photographic the repeat to decided was day,it that of weather rainy and grey the due ly The first pictures taken for the photographic report date on the 14th of March, unfortunate LIGHTING SYSTEM whole area,bringing anunsafe feeling tousers andmakingtheparkunusable. the covers darkness the and daylight no is there when comes issue The kids. for ground play and etc.practice;walk,grill.,run, can people that activities of amount big a is There cosy atmospheres, inviting peopletochill andrelax innature. (seepicture 14, 15and16) di character,park.of The the lacking into radicallytravelingdeeper change when feeling the port) there is located a big open area and the first insight from the areare photographicis quite route impersonal,27.Map figure (See Sølvtorvet from activity.Entering high no with park located in the inner city, seems not to be reflected when walking inside this green area Peace and Calm describes the feeling when venturing into Østre Anlæg. The fact that it is a EXPERIENCE ØSTRE ANLÆGANALYSES f erentcreatepark the landscapeof North-east the at hills levelsand narrow with paths paths. - Di there. - The placemusthave character tobecame interesting andinviting peopletobe RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: f erent landscape levels o photographic report f er more possibilitiestodesign, andnarrow andcosy /Qualitative Research - - - -

ØSTRE ANLÆG about it. know not did users the of majority the system interactive Søndermarken’s to Regarding ing system sincethey donotfeel safe atnightwhenthearea becomescompletely dark. and chill in nature between 12 and 3 pm. All the users agreed on the need of having a light relaxto week per times aroundtwo is park the visit to users the frequencyof highest The area couldbeduestudentresidents atthestreets closetothepark. that in people young of frequency high nature.The in friends with chill then area,and the people which mention that young they of like percentageto go big to a the Art also Museum is of family.Copenhagen,There in which is chill inside and child their with there go who old years -44 34 from people manly is percentage user highest the that show results The ØSTRE ANLÆGANALYSES Find thequestionnaire atchapter9.1Survey. the area were takingasurvey of10questionswith2openinit. of UsersAnlæg.Østre at 2016 of march of 14th and 12th the on out carried was survey A ØSTRE ANLÆG - Lightingsystem ishighly required by users. - Highdiversity ofplantsandtrees. - People prefer narrow pathsthanopenandbigareas RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: Survey Survey

ØSTRE ANLÆG the egory cat the under Copenahgen in lighting street for used armature wire ordinary the is which , park the of surrounding the on used lighting the page this in placed is there Nonetheless, the designprocess. in steps further for account into taken be will case of Amagerfælled, the qualitative research same the in However,area.as this for search areignored, invalidan leading quantitative re area green this of measurements lighting the Anlæeg Østre in lighting of absence the Due ØSTRE ANLÆG Copenhagen LightingMasterplan oa Rasrsdnil buildings Roads-residencial Local technical measurements . Figure 29. Road armature from

- - 8 meters. ca.of height a in mounting to 6 tur,and roadslocal in frequent Københavnerarma Armature /Quantitative Research Figure 28. Route armature -

ØSTRE ANLÆG The following image (Figure 31) shows the map of the green area and located on it the it on located zones for eachactivity and area green the of map the shows 31) (Figure image following The and three venues withexercise facilities. entrances all of marking path, the of lighting interactivepark, the of periphery the in path jogging a layers: fourth of consist project the , goal this achieve Todark. is it when even run, to people more motivate and opportunities new its and garden the to attention draw to was project culture, nature and movement. combines The overall aim of where the park modern creative a into area In this area a project called Life & Light turn the green hilly wooded landscape. sports, school screening, the in walk a for go or dog the jogging,walk events, ﬁlm free for lawns for the in metropolitana of middle city. nature Søndermarkenused is experience to opportunity the gives area green This 30) municipality.(Figure eriksberg Fred under located area green a is Søndermarken 5.4 SØNDERMARKEN Figure 31. MapofSøndermarken - Figure 30. Green zonereefers toSøndermarken location intheCopenhagenareal /Qualitative Research

SØNDERMARKEN ØSTRE ANLÆG 3 1 photographic report Figure 32. Route of the photographic report at Østre Anlæg

4 2 /Qualitative Research

SØNDERMARKEN 11 9 7 5 12 10 8 6

SØNDERMARKEN 16 15 14 13

SØNDERMARKEN daylight. of hours less thereis when time winter area,in the citizens formore possibilities opening in creating cooperates this alive system feeling of lighting the atmosphere. a When the with night falls, provided people can is keep enjoying park the that fact The technical measurements). on map (see avenue Cisternerne’s the at mainly luminaries mast and riphery pe park’s the around bollards interactive combines strategy lighting Søndermarken The LIGHTING SYSTEM runners toimprove theirrunningskills whilethey are innature. bring also park the in light interactive city.The a in day long a after air fresh them gives The park is placed in the inner city and its active all the time, people running walking... and way, asfor example unexpected monumentorcuriositythatcaught theirattention. its on surprises ﬁnd they is where adventure in transitionare they that This feel people paths. making smoothly narrow small into openings big from turns area The route. the When peoplegothrough theparkthey experience landscape changesall thetimethrough free innature. feeling play to dogs for chance the brings hill a of top on area big a dogs, their with there animals.exotic see Furthermore,to possibility the going people of number therehigh a is naturewith in time spend to kits enthusiastic with families of number higher a bring park di with users its to energy gives park This Søndermarken. is that time, the all Active Alive. EXPERIENCE conditions. weather cold and grey a under 2016,March of 18th the on dates reportphotographic The SØNDERMARKEN ANALYSES f erent zones and landscapes on the route. The fact that the Zoo is placed next to the to next placed is Zoo the that fact The route. the on landscapes and zones erent - Interactive lightingatoolfor designan create anactive atmosphere. - Changesonlandscape make thearea more dynamicandattractive. - Animalsandnature captivate people. - Active andinspirational space. RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: photographic report -

SØNDERMARKEN pepoles’ needs. Tosatisfy that park active an be Søndermakrenanalysesto surveyof seems the conclude preferences inahighervariety ofnature inthepark. their about inputs Furthermore,gave speed.users pace their in fit not does it because is system interactive the using not are they why reason the that added them of some over and make di contrastof high a system,has lighting which the to pointed users the of some it.However o park the that think Regarding the open questions about inputs for improving the area and observations, users them normally useit. of 15% only but tool enjoyable an is it that think they however lighting, interactive the of existence the about knew users time the of night majority The and system. lighting time the to day thanks during area the use mainly people how show also results The major activity isrunning. The week. per times 3-4 either of frequency a with old years 44 and 25 between the of area. Fromusers the results its possible to observe that the main fromgroup using the area is people information relevant obtain to order in helpful was survey a Carrying SØNDERMARKEN ANALYSES See survey questionnaire onchapter9.1.Survey taking asurvey of10several questionswith2openinit. A survey was carried out on the 18 of March of 2016 at Østre Anlæg. Users of the area were SØNDERMARKEN each user. - Interactive lightingshouldbemore flexible o - Interactive lightingseemsan enjoyable tool, butonly 15%ofpeopleuseit. - People ishappy whenthey feel free andnotlimitedby daylight. RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: f cult in winter time to figure out if there is any ice-block on the ground. More Survey f er a lot of opportunities to citizens and they are really happy about happy really are they and citizens to opportunities of lot a er Survey

f ering anadjustablepace speedto

SØNDERMARKEN light for biggerareas. (Figure 35) provide they bollard, the as aesthetics same the following which are luminaries mast there located avenue Cistern and entrances At the guide runner all over theroute. will and seconds three about for activated stays which colour specific a vates acti speed Each 15km/h. to 5 - speeds five from to programmed be can that strips Led intelligent an is there bollard the of side each On . 34) (FIgure bollard the of top the behind installed light backward and upward subtle a with areas surrounding the partly and path motion the partly illuminate bollards The 33). Figure (See luminaire. LED bollard CitySwan Philips a uses Søndermarken Copenahgen. Frederiksbergand in now until seen parks of image usual the to layer extra an adding tem Søndermakren use an interactive lighting sys LUMINAIRES to eachzoneandelevation. corresponds that distribution light the shows graphic Each analysed. graphically are area di two from taken measurements lux posteriori A located. are Søndermarken and it in specifies in which zones used luminaries the present section This SØNDERMAKREN technical measurements f rn zns n h green the in zones erent

- - Figure 35. Bollard CitySwan Figure 34. Bollard CitySwan Figure 33. Bollard CitySwan /Quantitative Research

SØNDERMARKEN // Type ofluminaries CitySwan LEDBollard CitySwan LEDBasic Figure 36. Position ofluminaires 03- Cylindrical mast CitySwan LEDBronze /Quantitative Research

SØNDERMARKEN SØNDERMARKEN 1 metns were taken Figrue 38. Photo ofthebollard luminaires where measure City Swan Bollard ZONE 1 Figure 37. Zones ofluxmeasurement Luxmeasurements - 2 22th and23thofMarch at20:00. The measurements were taken on zone. luminaire thatcan befound ateach ures 38and39present thetypeof measurements were taken. The ﬁg on fælledparken plan, where thelux The mapontheleftshows thezones luminaire are located. Figrue 39. Photo ofoneentrance tothe parkwere mast City Swan BasicLuminare ZONE 2 / Qualitative Research -

SØNDERMARKEN PLAN ELEVATIONS A-A’ ANDB-B’ VISUALIZATION OFZONE1 ELEVATION A-LuxmeterpointingL2 ELEVATION A -LuxmeterpointingL1 1750 mm 3.500 mm 1750 mm 1123 mm 500 mm 1123 mm L1 L1 L1 Scale 335 3 7 5 3 13 32 76 203 407 500 mm 500 341 1 9 1000 mm 284 1 8 150 0 7 93 0 6 63 0 6 36 0 6

23 0 5 9 0 5 4 0 4 2 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 A 0 0 0 15.000 mm 15.000 0 0 0 0 0 0 L1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 3 2 0 6 3 0 11 4 0 25 5 0 B 39 6 0 68 6 0 L2 95 6 0 156 7 1 296 7 1 A’ 339 8 3 L2 L2 L2 330 7 3 4 6 14 36 80 223 409 B’ ELEVATION B -LuxmeterpointingofL2 ELEVATION B-Luxmeteronthedirection B-B’ B B 2 0 4 0 8 0 12 2 3 2 2 3 1 4 0 5 0 6 0 6 0 7 0 3 B’ B’ 0 5 SØNDERMARKEN Light distribution Luminaire Techinical Data Map ofSøndermarken areal Bollard PHILIPS CITIYSWAN Lux Mesureaments Dimentions LED source tion A to A’ and directon A’ to A. The project refers to each one as A-A’ and A’-A respectively. AA’-Elevation example: direcfor directions, as both in axis each at takenwere urements meas lux Fælledparkenelevation in each procedureused at wheresame the followsX. It The lux measurements at Zone 1 were taken in two di / ZONE1-PHILIPSCITYSWAN BOLLARD yses ofthePhilips CitySwan BasicMast. 1 where the Philips CitySwan bollards are located and it continues at Zone 2 with the anal The study of the lighting measurements starts with the analyses of the illuminance at Zone SØNDERMARKEN Analyses Luxmeasurements Figure 40. Zones 1 Figure 41. Process f erent elevations as shown on ﬁgure /Qualitative Research - - -

SØNDERMARKEN h lx esrmns n et igas orsod o vria pa o a egt of height a on plan vertical a H=1,75m. (Figure 42) to correspond diagrams next on measurements lux The Elevation AA’ / ZONE1-PHILIPSCITYSWAN BOLLARD FACE level Figure 42. Elevation AA’ level 1

Visualization onelevation AA’

/Qualitative Research

A’-A Direction A’-A Direction A-A’

SØNDERMARKEN The lux measurements on next diagrams correspond to the vertical axis on a height of height a H=1,75m (Figure 43).on axis vertical the to correspond diagrams next on measurements lux The Elevation BB’ / ZONE1-PHILIPSCITYSWAN BOLLARD FACE level Figure 43. Elevation BB’level 1

Visualization onelevation BB’

/Qualitative Research

B’-B Direction B’-B Direction B-B’

SØNDERMARKEN axis ataheightof1.75mis4,3lux. The results from both elevations in Søndermarken, show that the average lux on a vertical transition ofthetwozones. (Figure 45) er. In this case due the back-lighting the result does not gives an smooth curve between the all curve when they are placed on top of each oth individually, it is interesting to see how is the over observed been has lux/meter graphics the Once the values increase againupto5lux. since wrong, placed was luxmeter the that or ter ering part of the light on the surface of the luxme cov object unexpected some due be could it This pick. highest the after just L2, from meters 3 at 3lux to breakdown a is there B’B direction the On back-lighting. due wildlife, in impact higher a has it people, of though this lighting can increase the safety feeling Al people surrounding. the path,of information extra receive the on light enough the to Addi area.tionally green the through night by walking e lighting This figure 44) (See up-words. pointing side back the on light source extra an has which luminary the of design the roundings.However,to according sur is result the path’s lit to avoid and wildlife to respectful be must areas green in lighting the that specifies accordance to in the Copenhagen seem master plan,not which does outcome This Zone. Path the and Zone Back the in measurements the di drastic a is therepage,previous the on resultsgraphic the at Looking Elevation BB’ tween thistwoluminarieswhichfar15meterfrom each-other. di di The ferent directions, even thought it should be exactly the same , since it is the same product. dif the rangesin lux previous between ,casesvariationregisteredin there small is As an Elevation AA’ f user of the luminaire or other bias. In both directions it has been registered 0 lux be lux 0 registered been has it directions both In bias. other or luminaire the of user f - CitySwan Bollard with7W gives anaverage luxof4,3luxataheight of1.75m 1’5m from theluminaire, givinginformation ofthesurroundings tousers. the bollard,on the only of but side back the on values high gives Design CitySwan - RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: erences on values can be due several circumstances, maintenance, spots on the on spots maintenance, circumstances, several due be can values on erences f ect increase the vision field when field vision the increase ect ------Figure 44. Bollard CitySwan, backlighting. Figure 45. Curves inthesamegraphic /Qualitative Research f erence between erence - -

SØNDERMARKEN The following diagrams correspond toilluminances onthegorundlevel. GROUND Level GROUND level Figure 46. Ground level measurments Visualization onelevation

/Qualitative Research

ELEVATION BB’ ELEVATION AA’ ELEVATION

SØNDERMARKEN meters 3 the during starting at5mfromexample L1. for as lux, 0 to down go values where areas is there 409, di high presents it path the on distribution light the poles, between 15m of distance whole the In considering thevalues from bothelevations. when 95,6lx,pathway,average of the an over with lux 409 to lx 4 from goes values Lights light the that observe distribution of to the Luminaire CitySwan has an asymmetric light possible distribution on the ground. Its level ground the on Lux/meter graphics the From GROUND Level conclusion between where luxare zero. - Ifbollards are placedinadistanceof15m, thenthere isregistered 3meterso in - CitySwan use7W perluminaire and gives anaverage of95,6luxonground. - CitySwan Bollard gives anasymmetriclightdistributiononground level. f RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: erences in lux values. When at one meter from the pole we can ﬁnd values up to up values ﬁnd can we pole the from meter one at values.When lux in erences /Qualitative Research

SØNDERMARKEN VISUALIZATION OF ZONE 2 SØNDERMARKEN Lux Mesureaments ELEVATIONS C-C’ AND D-D’

Map of Søndermarken areal

D’ L4 C

C’ L3 D

ELEVATION C - Luxmeter direcction C-C’

111 156 233 378 430 320 36 25 20 15 6 5 4 2 1 1 0 0 0 0 3.500 mm

1750 mm1750 Luminaire Techinical Data 75 103 181 364 606 774 848 766 664 557 412 302 189 125 69 34 22 18 12 9 PHILIPS CITIYSWAN BASIC Dimentions C L4 C’ 2.000 mm 7.500mm LED source

Light distribution ELEVATION C - Luxmeter direccrtion C’-C

1 2 4 6 10 25 530 940 560 320 158 112 84 63 50 40 32 24 21 19 3.500 mm 1750 mm1750 75 103 181 364 606 774 848 766 664 557 412 302 189 125 69 34 22 18 12 9 LEGEND C L4 C’ u Units in Lux 2.000 mm 7.500mm Luxmeter facing on the arrow direction Luxmeter facing on the arrow direction L1 Luminaire 1 L2 Luminaire 2 Top view of luminaire

Scale 1000 mm VISUALIZATION OFZONE2 ELEVATIONS C-C’ANDD-D’ ELEVATION DD -Luxmeterdirection D’-D PLAN VIEW ELEVATION DD’-Luxmeterdirection D-D’ L3 L3 L3 30 610 192 4 7 9 19 28 61 121 311 402 548 666 751 844 769 30 25 670 577 21 654 879 18 576 798 17 490 765 16 423 632

14 343 487 13 287 463 11 168 420 10 146 374 9 108 311 8 87 276 8 71 254 D 7 59 204 6 47 193 5 41 176 L3 4 35 161 3 29 123 2 23 102 1 17 85 1 15 64 1 13 43 1 11 36 C 1 10 28 1 7 21 L4 1 5 17 1 3 15 2 3 13 D’ 2 2 11 3 1 10 3 0 9 4 0 9 C’ 5 1 8 6 1 7 6 2 6 7 3 5 8 3 5 9 5 4 11 7 3 13 10 3 16 11 2 18 14 1 22 15 1 26 22 1 37 26 1 49 32 2 73 36 2 115 45 2 131 56 3 181 68 3 231 80 4 291 105 6 360 131 6 215 157 9 430 268 9 SØNDERMARKEN 450 324 12 610 400 15 750 488 16 770 563 16 815 633 19 550 688 24 L4 L4 L4 27 27 9 12 18 22 34 69 125 189 302 412 557 664 766 848 774 606 Lux Mesureaments

1000 mm 1750 mm 3.500 mm LEGEND L2 L1 u Scale Top viewofluminaire Luminaire 2 Luminaire 1 Units inLux direction Luxmeter facingonthearrow direction Luxmeter facingonthearrow urements were registered for eachelevation intwodirections (C-C’, C’-C, D-D’, andD’-D, ) The lux measurements at zone two were taken the same procedure as in zone one. Meas / ZONE2-PHILIPSCITYSWAN BASIC Figure 48. Procedure Figure 47. Zone 2 /Qualitative Research -

SØNDERMARKEN Elevation CC’ urements were registered for eachelevation intwodirections (C-C’, C’-C, D-D’, andD’-D, ) The lux measurements at zone two were taken the same procedure as in zone one. Meas / ZONE2-PHILIPSCITYSWAN BASIC FACE level Figure 49. Elevation CC’Level 1

Visualization onelevation CC’ /Qualitative Research

C’-C Direction C’-C Direction C-C’

SØNDERMARKEN Elevation DD’ urements were registered for eachelevation intwodirections (C-C’, C’-C, D-D’, andD’-D, ) The lux measurements at zone two were taken the same procedure as in zone one. Meas / ZONE2-PHILIPSCITYSWAN BASIC Face level Figure 50. Elevation DD’Level 1

Visualization onelevation DD’ /Qualitative Research

D’-D Direction D’-D Direction D-D’

SØNDERMARKEN tions. eleva both from values the with it calculating when 117,5lux, is 1.75m of height a at axis The results from both elevations in Søndermarken, show that the average lux on a vertical it even poles, follows aprogressivebetween lessening. Onthiselevation, thevalues rangedistance goesfrom 1to879lx. the of half at values and luminaires the to close values di drastic a is therepage,previous the on resultsgraphic the at Looking Elevation DD’ direction C’C values decrease considerably after the ﬁrst 2 meters from L3 on the pathway. On . 940lux to 0lux from goes levels illuminance of rangedirections, the both Considering the luxinavertical axisataheightof1.75m. the CitySwan Basic luminaire gather the highest values on the path zone when measuring There is registered a variation between lux ranges in the di Elevation CC’ - CitySwan Basicuse24W togive anaverage of117,5 luxataheightof1.75m. - The luxdistributuionofCitySwan Basicgives highestvalues onthepathzone. RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: f erent directions, showing that /Qualitative Research f erence between erence -

SØNDERMARKEN

GROUND level Figure 51. Elevations onground level Visualization onelevation

/Qualitative Research

ELEVATION DD’ ELEVATION CC’ ELEVATION

SØNDERMARKEN luminaire L3. the whole distance between poles, there is only registered an zero lux for has 1 meter at 15m Basic On from848lux. to 0 from goes CitySwanvalues Lights zone. path the over Luminaire expansion radial asymmetric that conclude distribution light the on Observations GROUND Level conclusion - Ifmastsare inadistanceof30,5m, there isregistered for 1metervalues on0lux. - Using24W perluminaire theaverage Luxonground is205,2lux highest levels onthepathway. - CitySwan Basicgives asymmetriclightdistribution onground level, focusing the RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: /Qualitative Research

SØNDERMARKEN over 1unitonground andfacelevel. CitySwano mast Basic The Swan gives asurrounding information tousers increasing thesafety feeling. the 1meter, the di back-lighting,the due is impact valueshiger within highest This keeps the it although that CitySwan bollard has a higher impact on wildlife than the ERCO IP65 used in Fælledparken. the pathsways,of the design all the lit to avoidingwildlife in impact the minimized to tries Søndermarken in strategy the though Fælledparken.Even in seen been has also as ities, activ human for park the of quality the increase to functionality required the on pending di using in consist Søndermarken in used strategy light The CONCLUSION SØNDERMARKENlightingmeasurments - If masts are in a distance of 30,5m, there is registered on the length of 1meter of length values with0lux. the on registered is there 30,5m, of distance a in are masts If - - Using24W perluminaire theluxaverage onground level is 205,2lux highest levels onthepathway. the focusing level, ground on distribution light asymmetric gives Basic CitySwan - - CitySwan Basicuse24W togive anaverage of117,5luxataheight1.75m. on thebackzone. than pathway the on values highest gives Basic CitySwan of distributuion lux The - SUM UPRELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: f erence between both bollards is signiﬁcant. On the other hand, the City f ers a lighting distribution that coverspathwaythat lux the alldistribution with lighting ersa f erent type of luminaries de luminaries of type erent /Qualitative Research - - -

SØNDERMARKEN activity. each for zones the it on located and area green the of map the shows 53) (Figure image following The ing, cycling, sunbathing, football matches and hiking. hang-glid bonﬁres, picnics, running, pursuits, door out activities: of range wide a practice can People there ispopulationofwildbirds, wildlife andnature. hectares97 are covered by water. UtterslevIn Mose municipalities. Gladsaxe It has an and area of Copenhagen 200 hectares of between which border the on located area semi-natural large a is Mose Utterslev 5.5. UTTERSLEV MOSE Figure 53. MapofUtterselv Mose - - iue 2 Gen oe efr t Utterslev Mose location intheCopenhagenareal to reefers zone Green 52. Figure

UTTERSLEV MOSE Date: 25thofFebruary. Utterslev Mose 3 1 photographic report Figure 54. Route ofthephotographic report atUtterslev Mose

4 2 /Qualitative Research

UTTERSLEV MOSE 11 9 7 5 12 10 8 6

UTTERSLEV MOSE 16 15 14 13

UTTERSLEV MOSE around sunsettime. zone the leave to users make It and zone playgrounds,grill as areas activities for lighting existing non a also is It paths, on lighting existing non area.The the around unsafe feel to is a beautiful place to be, but when the night falls, It becomes extremely dark making users Utterslev Mose is a green area which is not provided with lighting system. During day time LIGHTING SYSTEM seem careless, noninviting topeopleuseit. and conditions good present not do zones the of some however exercises, practicing for place interestingto be and to morediscover while being in a nature. In areaUtterslev Mose there this are several makeareas 10, picture as paths, small and report, photographic Although, Itisabiggreen area, thefactthatcombinesopenings, asonpicture 13from the side totheotherofroad tocontinueonyour tour. one from walk to out watch to having space the of harmony the breaktunately,roads the di in crossingMose Utterslevtwo roads the lakesand fourdivide The paths. ings, allow to host a wide range of wildlife that users can experience by walking along the through the walking area. when The combination air of lakes and the the di in is nature and freedom of feeling The forest. into merge and city o Mose Utterslev of dimensions big The EXPERIENCE The pictures datefrom onthe25thofFebruary. UTTERSLEV MOSEANALYSES - Darkness - Unsafe feeling atnight - Bigopeningsandnarrow pathsmake thespaceinteresting - Highbiodiversity - The green area isdividedby lakes androads. - Freedom andnature in theair RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: photographic report f er to users the possibility of disconnect from the from disconnect of possibility the users to er f erent vegetation from the surround f erentzones. Unfor - -

UTTERSLEV MOSE use thearea whenthere isnodaylight. of nature.experience to and activities requirecitizens However systemto illumination an forrange wide a practice to area big a biodiversity, its due pollution light to vulnerability high with area an as described be can Mose Utterslev analyses, survey the conclude To time tousethearea anditwouldincrease thesafety feeling . the on freedom them give would it since system, lighting a for demand them of majority the and areagreen the to going when daylight the of dependence strong an have to seem Regarding the open questions about inputs for improving the area and observations, users it mustbeanenjoyable tool. that think they Søndermarken,however in system interactivelighting the of existence the lighting and unsafe feeling during night time. A high percentage of users do not poor know a about on coincide them of all since conditions lighting the due be can that fact 3pm, and results also The show time.how freepeople mainly there use the enjoy area to during day place time, the specially between of 8am us make kids of lot a , park the to close school an is there Since walk. and running for mainly area the area use the who people of young group people is user main the that conclude be can results the of founding the From UTTERSLEV ANALYSES The survey questionnaire can beseenonchapter9.1Survey the area were takingasurvey of10several questionswith2openinit. A survey was carried out on the 25th and 26th of march of 2016 at Utterslev Mose. Users of UTTERSLEV MOSE - Highbiodiversity. - Importanceofalightingsystem for users atnight. - Young peopleandkidsusingthearea. RELEVANT FOR THE DESIGN: Survey Survey

UTTERSLEV MOSE tative research will betaken intoaccountfor furtherstepsinthedesignprocess. green this areaare invalidignoredresearchan quantitative leading area.of this for However, measurementsquali the lighting the Mose, Utterslev at lighting of absence the Due UTTERSLEV MOSE technical measurements

/Quantitative Research -

UTTERSLEV MOSE /Quantitative Research

5.6 Comparison Technical Measurements

On the next pages there is calculated the light efciency and the Watts per Km that each area use for each type of luminaire.

The coomparison starts showing the results of Fælledparken and Søndermarken when using a bollard luminaire and continues with the results of the two green areas when it is used a mast luminare. LUX DISTRIBUTUION ONGROUND LEVEL Watts perkm Number ofluminaire perkm Average Luxonfacelevel Average Luxonground level Height ofsource Distance betweenbollards Luminous e Luminous e Power Luminous ﬂuxoftheluminaire Color temperature Luminaire matic lightatawavelength of555nm(green). monochro of case the for lm/W, 683 of value possible e luminous Photopic e luminous SI, In consumes. it that power input of amount total the and device a by emitted ﬂux luminous total the between e Lighting as Understanding system. E Light the study sections This FÆLLEDPARKEN

f f f cacy has units of lumens per watt (lm/W). watt per lumens of units has cacy

ciency cacy

light e

f cacy of radiation has a maximum a has radiation of cacy f

ciency

f iny f h lighting the of ciency 3.618 W/km 134luminaires/km 4,4lx 58,9lx 0,9m 15,0m 3,3% 22,7lm/w 27,0 W 617,0lm 4000K ERCO IP65 f iny h ratio the ciency

FÆLLEDPARKEN - /Qualitative Research

FÆLLEDPARKEN LUX DISTRIBUTUION ONGROUND LEVEL Watts perkm Number ofluminaire perkm Average Luxonfacelevel Average Luxonground level Height ofsource Distance betweenbollards Luminous e Luminous e Power Luminous ﬂuxoftheluminaire Color temperature Luminaire naires oftheSøndermarken lightingsystem. This sections study the Light E SØNDERMARKEN

f f

ciency cacy

lighte

ciency

3000K

ciency of City Swan lumi 938,0 W/km 134,0luminaires/km 4,3lx 95,6lx 1,07m 15,0m 7,9% 54,3lm/w 7,0 W 380,0lm CitySwan Bollard

- /Quantitative Research

SØNDERMARKEN LUX DISTRIBUTUION ONGROUND LEVEL Watts perkm Number ofluminaire perkm Average Luxonfacelevel Average Luxonground level Height ofsource Distance betweenbollards Luminous e Luminous e Power Luminous ﬂuxoftheluminaire Color temperature Luminaire ken lightingsystem whenusingPhilipPark luminaries. E Light the study sections This FÆLLEDPARKEN

f f

ciency cacy

light e

ciency

4176,0 W/km

ciency of the Fælledparthe of ciency 72,0luminaires/km 26,0lx 61,0lx 4,0m 28,0m 9,1% 62,3lm/w 58 W 3614lm 4000K Philips Park

FÆLLEDPARKEN - /Qualitative Research

FÆLLEDPARKEN LUX DISTRIBUTUION ONGROUND LEVEL Watts perkm Number ofluminaire perkm Average Luxonfacelevel Average Luxonground level Height ofsource Distance betweenbollards Luminous e Luminous e Power Luminous ﬂuxoftheluminaire CRI Color temperature Luminaire basic luminaires from Søndermaken lightingsystem. Swan City of information technical the gather page This SØNDERMARKEN

f f

ciency cacy

light e

ciency

1.560 W/km 65,0luminaires/km 117,7lx 205,2lx 0,9m 15,0m 13,7% 94,1lm/w 24,0 W 2260,0 lm 80 3000 K CITY SWAN BASIC

/Quantitative Research

SØNDERMARKEN CONCLUSION/Quantitative Research

5.7 Conclusion Technical measurements

Color temperature 4000 K Luminous flux of the luminaire 617,0 lm ERCO IP65 Power 27,0 W Luminous efcacy 22,7 lm/w Luminous efciency 3,3 % Distance between bollards 15,0 m Height of source 0,9 m Average Lux on ground level 58,9 lx Average Lux on face level 4,4 lx Number of luminaire per km 67 luminaires/km Watts per km 1.809 W/km Color temperature 3000 K BOLLARD Luminous flux of the luminaire 380,0 lm CitySwan Power 7,0 W Luminous efcacy 54,3 lm/w Luminous efciency 7,9 % Distance between bollards 15,0 m Height of source 1,07 m Average Lux on ground level 95,6 lx Average Lux on face level 4,3 lx Number of luminaire per km 67 luminaires/km Watts per km 469 W/km Color temperature 4000 K Philips Park Luminous flux of the luminaire 3614 lm Power 58 W Luminous efcacy 62,3 lm/w Luminous efciency 9,1 % Distance between mast 28,0 m Height of source 4,0 m Average Lux on ground level 61,0 lx Average Lux on face level 26,0 lx Number of luminaire per km 36 luminaires/km Watts per km 2.088 W/km

MAST Color temperature 3000 K CitySwan Basic Luminous ﬂux of the luminaire 2260,0 lm Power 24,0 W Luminous efcacy 94,1 lm/w Luminous efciency 13,7 % Distance between mast 30,5 m Height of source 0,9 m Average Lux on ground level 205,2 lx Average Lux on face level 117,7 lx Number of luminaire per km 33 luminaires/km Watts per km 792 W/km /Quantitative Research

CONCLUSION light efciency

BOLLARD Looking at the results it was found out that in Fælledparken, using ERCO IP65, a power consumption of 1.809 W per km, results in an average illuminance of 58,9lx on the ground level. The vertical illuminance on a height of 1.75m for facial recognition is 4,4lx in average. This gives an illuminated pathway with values over 1lx with an homogeneous lit.

Using the same type of bollard but a CitySwan Philips luminaire, in Søndermakren, the lighting consumes 469 W per km of pathway, resulting in a higher average illuminance of 95,6lx on the ground. The vertical illuminance on a heigh of 1.75 for facial recognition is 4,3lx, around the same illuminances than in Fælledparken.

Therefore with a consumption of just 25,9 % of electricity, the lighting in Søndermarken is achieving higher illuminances on ground level. However the lighting is not that homogeneous as in Fælledparken and It creates black spaces on the pathway with illuminances under 1lx.

The result is caused by the same spacing of less powerful luminiares with just 380 lumen compared to the more powerful ones used in Fælledparken, featuring 617 lumen.

MAST Looking at the results it was found out that in Fælledparken, using Philips Park, a power consumption of 2.088,0 W per km, results in an average illuminance of 61 lx on the ground level. The vertical illuminance on a height of 1.75m for facial recognition is 26 lx in average. This gives a illuminated pathway with illuminances over 2lx and a more evenly lit with mainly no vertical illuminances under 1lx.

Using the same type of luminaire but a CitySwan Basic, in Søndermakren, the lighting consumes 792,0 W per km of pathway, resulting in a higher average illuminance of 205,2lx on the ground. The vertical illuminance on a heigh of 1.75 for facial recognition is 117,7lx, a 22% more than Fælledparken.

Therefore with a consumption of just 37,9 % of electricity, the lighitng in Søndermarken is achieving higher illuminances on ground level. However the lighting is not that homogeneous as in Fælledparken and It creates black spaces on the pathway with luminances under 1lx.

The result is caused by the bigger spacing of less powerful luminiares with just 2260 lumen compared to the more powerful ones used in Fælledparken, featuring 3614 lumen and a reduction of the distance between mast of 2,5m. which alsoprovokes variations intheamountofdaylight ateachplaceintheEarth. e which Sun, the around Earth the of rotation the due happens cycle nature described The green and small leaves appearagainonthetree,and announcingthatSpringhasarrived. shining is sun The increase. daylight of hours the and snow more year.the of Suddenly,period freezingno this is thereduring branches its all covers it and is erased for the white and cool landscapes from winter. The snowflakes fall over the Tree it soon that air the on atmosphereromantic a it, with brings autumn and shorter become Daysgrounds. forest and streets covering fall they until brownish Treeturn the of leaves the up, shows autumn the and ends summer the colour.when greenAlthough, fresh and goes through di A good way to describe and visualize these changes is by imagine a Tree in a forest, which the year, asawheelinmotion. define its beauty. These colours come from nature which is in continuous changing all over that colours some by characterized is season Winter.and Summer,Each Spring,Autumn di 4 the through going nature in changes experience earth the year Every The Seasons was stablishfor theUtterslev Moselightingsystem. people can experience itsbeautyduringthewholeyear. Inspirational comments as the above kept the attention on how to enhance nature and how and they like toenjoy themwhilerelaxing, running orwalking innature. of each green area. From the analyses it was found out that people is interested in colours survey the photographicreportand the out carryingcreated after was concept global The 6.1 GLOBAL CONCEPT 6. DESIGN f ects nature by the light that it spreads changing the angle of incidence at each solstice,each at incidence of angle the spreadschanging it that light naturethe byects “Copenhagen cityhall shouldplantmore variety oftrees andflowers inthepark” f “ Icometoparkbecause Ilike toseethecolours ofnature” erent states; at the beginning of the summer it spreads its most powerful Figure 55 . Solsticeand sunincidence

rm hr, h goa concept global the there, From f erent season: erent

GLOBAL CONCEPT mianted withthecolourofﬂowers. illu be will Mose Utterslev year the through transition colour smooth and bringing son sea each in colours nature the enhancing by nature supports concept This Mose. slev Utter for concept design the deﬁnes case, study this of nature the with season each to correspondthat wheel colour the Combining (See Figure 56) canthat plants ent solstice. foundeach be in di the of because is colour change ture na why reason The Wheels. Color in years for visualized and studied been has season each in colours nature’s the of change The Utterslev Mose GLOBAL CONCEPT INTO CONTEXT

f er - - - - - Figure 56. Nature wheel

GLOBAL CONCEPT lighting. of layers three of consist which Mose Utterslev for system lighting the result a as gives the colours of the season and the seasonal plants are taking a roll. The combination of both The lighting concept for Utterslev Mose it is based on the global concept presented, where Interactive Nature Wheel forUtterslev Mose 6.2 LIGHTINGCONCEPT LAYER 3 LAYER 2 LAYER 1 -Accent lighting -Intelligent Lighitng -General Lighting to cover theneedsofusers whenitisrequired. Lighting for big sport areas like the football courts will have specific down-lights same colourrange. di 4 di 4 in year the over change will block each throughyearthe representing di a change will they and , color RGB same the share will block each in zone ercise ex playgroundsor the lakes.Allthree the by defined are which blocksthree in colour of an specific plant of the season. The Utterslev Mose area will be divided the for defined be lakes,threewill the of each around used colour lighting The even Itcan notbeexperienced inashortterm. changing constant in be will light of colour year.The the through seasons the colour wheel. The transition between colours will be smoothly, as smooth travel seasonal the to according colour change will which system lighting interactive an have will paths peripherallight. The and nature between be will case this in As observed in Søndermarken, the lighting system will have and interaction, but vide more spatiallight. pro to need they since zones,exercise or playgrounds and entrances at used, be will luminaries mast strategy,Søndermarken and Fælledparken Following in darknesstominimizethelightpollution. kept are paths inner between periphery.interconnectionsarea smaller the The aroundused be will airspace.lighting on of impact type minor This a has it that lards provides enough light to see the faces of people walking , at the same time bol of usage the measurements.that technicalresultsshowed the The of yses The decisionofselectingthistypesluminariesliesontheresults oftheanal sary lightthatcouldcontributetoincrease theimpactinwildlife. re unneces any having surroundingor lit spectively.to avoidsystem zones lighting The specific or pathways in used mast, and bollards lighting on a based follows strategy which lighting, general the is scheme the of layer first The f erent plants. The transition between colours would be smooth and in the in and smooth be would colours between transition The plants. erent

f erentseason.each in plant that means This f erent colours that will represent will that colours erent ------

LIGHTING CONCEPT will bespecifiedonthenext chapter6.4Lightingfixtures. be placed. The exactly amount of luminaries will be defined for the product selected, which (Figure map, following The exercise or areas. playgrounds as zones, specific for ones second the and pathways rounding sur the illuminate to luminaries.ones firstmast bollardThe and use general lighting The 6.3 IMPLEMENTATION LAYER 1 -General Lighting Special luminaire for sportcourt. Mast luminare for lighting exercise and playground zones Bollard luminare

57), shows the location where these two types of lighting will lighting of types two these where location the shows 57), Figure 57. Position ofluminaries. -

LIGHTING CONCEPT design for eacharea undertheuniqueglobalatmosphere of thewholegreen area. at the exercise areas to be in accordance around each lake. This will create an harmonious This intelligent lighting will control the bollards on the peripheral paths as well as the mast inside thesameseasonpallet. di a running be will there where lake, each for one boxes, Three and thecolourrange isprogrammed for eachseasoninthree di speed year.The the through pass seasons the that speed same the in colour the change luminaries.It the of RGB the control to allows that integratedsystem an uses lighting The and supportitwithitschangingcolours through outtheyear. nature enhance can that system intelligent an for looks it light, and people between tion reasonthe is That whyforMose, lighting Utterlsev the searchingof instead forinterac an a lighting interaction, but at the same time, the majority of the users do not make use of it. dermarken. From the Survey it was found out that people like that Søndermarken presents o that light and people between interaction the by inspired is layer second The LAYER 2 -Intelligent Lighting Figure 58. The three areas thatcorre spond tothethree lakes - f erent control box. f erent range of colours of range erent f ers Søn ers - -

LIGHTING CONCEPT in thelocal luminaire sinceitisnotdesired thatthecommand a motion sensor to dim or increase the amount of light when it is required. This is controlled integrated an is there luminaire each Inside led. RGB the over commands controller the minaries has an integrated communication module that allows to read the signal and then signal is send to the transmitter which the forward the signal by wifi to day the luminaires. The that lu for colour the changing after and Color RGB new a to corresponds year the of everyday that specifies code a which program,in processing a running is Pi Rasppery luminaries from everywhere since the information can be change through a link in internet. wirelessa transmitter.and Pi erry the of controlinformation allowsto the RasperryPi The Rasp a is there Box Control each Inside zone.lake each for one ,Box Control 3 areThere the following picture simplifythetechnical system. sor will allow to dim or increase the light when it is required. For an easier understanding, control system. On the same other hand the local the control is in each to bollard, where connected a motion sen area each to corresponds that luminaries mast the and bollards the having on consist control global The local. and global control; of levels two in consist It wifi. by controlled scheme lighting a by defined is project this of lighting intelligent The Figure 59. Scheme oftheintelligent lighting f ects thewholesystem. - - -

LIGHTING CONCEPT can befound onthecorrespondent seasoninUtterslev Mose. that nature of type any or ﬂower plans, three to related are that colours three extract an season each of pictures two the observing on consist colours the obtain procedureto The design. the in the used be will of that colours the author determinate will pictures the The season. each on projectby Mose Utterslev at taken were page next the on photographies The STEP STEP 3 1 SPRING photo 2 photo 1 Lighting inUtterslev Moseuseoneof the colors in each area. STEP 2 Color pallet for Spring

LIGHTING CONCEPT WINTER AUTUMN SUMMER SPRING PHOTO 1 PHOTO 2 COLOR G:211 G:251 G:170 G:199 G:229 G:153 R:187 R:214 R:207 R:222 R:239 R:130 B:151 B:189 B:191 B:213 B:235 G:111 G:184 G:215 G:108 G:151 G:187 R:103 R:172 R:198 R:160 R:204 R:237 B:138 B:207 B:240 B:106 B:113 B:92 B:84 H:326 H:323 H:324 H:226 H:219 H:216 H:83 H:84 H:96 B:60 B:83 B:98 B:81 B:87 B:94 S:40 S:28 S:25 S:18 S:10 H:13 H:28 H:36 B:54 B:81 B:94 B:63 B:80 B:93 S:25 S:17 S:18 S:41 S:48 S:52 S:4

LIGHTING CONCEPT for thissituation. it is not the aim of this project. However, the next images presents a plausible example that ject we will not detail the amount and the fixture type for this lighting, since sports lighting lighting fixture will follow a similar characteristics as the example of figure 60. In this pro The selected court area can be seen on the map at the introduction of this chapter and the minimize theaerialpollution sincethey are normally placedinhighheight. of lumen coming out from this type of fixtures. Moreover, lighting only one court, it will also main the only football court illuminated in order to avoidbe a higher impact in wildlife due the high amount would It that decided been has It football, for courts several are there regardingfourthis The layerdesign lighting the of lighting.sports Mose Utterlsev in Since LED-SL60-250-UNV Neptun lighting LAYER 3 -Accent lighting Figure 60. Plausibleluminaire -

LIGHTING CONCEPT a plausiblesolutionfor Utterslev Moselightingsystem. luminairemakethe it and as Philips by confirmed was RGBCItySwan in of possibility The users inUtterslev Mosesinceitwill give theminformation ofthesurrounding. for beneficial be can back-lighitng a Havingluminaire. the of side back the on meter first the during level lux high a has CitySwan that shown analyses the of However,results the tion andusers needs. two luminaires, to use CitySwang would be the better solution regarding power consump Panorama.Ercothese W,700 using Comparing is than kilometer less for 61,3% used still consumption power the technique this Using recognition. facial for and level ground the on distribution light evenimprove the that time increase,same consumption the power at the while reduced is distance The meters. 10 of distance a in CitySwan placing by power less using floor the on distribution light similar a bring to possible is hand,it other the On using thisexact luminaire. reducingconsumption reducingdistance,of power of the sibility the possibility there no is the pos pathway,no the is thereof 1lux.If registeredwereside at valuesunder where opposite and distance middle the at area small an for except 1lux, over levels illuminance with floor Panoramathe coversERCO that analyses the provedin been has desired.It not it is not possible to increase the distance between bollards, if black spaces on the floor are product,this 15meters.Using of distance a in arebollards the when W/km use1.809 Erco values onground level can make di di Moreover,high meters. the o 15 of distance can same the Erco in displayed what as even that not is floor the on light 7W,the distribution only power, less using is CitySwan though even that, found was it studied, ErcoPanoramathe and CitySwanwherewhere the conclusion analyses from the Starting CitySwan test combination betweene beneficial a bring could change This bollards. of positions changing by technique new a apply will luminaire,it same the test will Fælledparkenit Søndermakren.Althoughof and luminaires studied current the using of possibility the account into take process testing e and distribution lighting desire the out finding on step next the programis already lighting.Dialux TestingGeneral in 1- luminairesLayer been chapeter previous the in has presented placed be will luminaire of type each where zones the of division The marken analyses. Sønder and Fælledparken the from out found has it as mast, and bollard luminaires, of types two of usage the follows Mose Utterslev for design lighting the in strategyused The 6.3 LIGHTINGPOSITION TECHNIQUE BOLLARDS Testing f ciency, needsofusers andwildlife impact. f cult theadaptationprocess todarkness. f er when the bollards are bollards the when er f erences between lux between erences f ciency.The - - -

BOLLARD TESTING solved by placing one bollard every 10 meters. The lux levels become more evenly dis evenly tributied andtheaverage ofilluminances 4.04lx. more become levels lux The meters. 10 every bollard one placing by solved is luminaries between spaces dark of problem the how appreciate to possible DIALUX,is from obtain level ground the on distribution lux the and image colour false the at Looking CitySwan ina 10meterdistancebetweenbollards hasbeentestina3DmodelDIALUX. TEST 1 at 10mfrom eachotherandthepathwidthwas 3m. To evaluate CitySwan solution a 3D model in Dialux was done. The luminaires were placed Source Height:914mm 3D False colour: Lux ground level: Lux distributuiononaplanview: Lux Semy-cylindrical h:1,75: -

BOLLARD TESTING The specifications oftheluminarieandoptionsare onfigure 63. pany having luminariesinRGB itcouldbepossible. atures of 4.000K and 3.000K. After contacting the com o way,pathway..).also (one doble It di the due interesting really is which optics asymmetric and ric The luminaire o time. real in internet the via interface, graphical intuitive an communication to control and monitor lighting through wireless utilize which LumaWatt as solutions nected drivers, twistlock or button type photocontrols and con grated controls as standalone occupancy sensors, DALI inte has It receptacles. photocontrol through or tems dimming drivers that can be controlled by external sys 0-10V integral with solutions enabled It consumption. This luminare has also integrated a sensor for reducing inspired by nature. (figure61 andfigure 62) elements,design organic seamless uses that minaires was o bollard.It Arbor Invue Eaton’s product suitable most the research some After minaire for Utterslev Mose. lu final the choosing before market the on luminaires with possibilities more study to interesting was It tion, solu possible a as evaluated was CitySwan Although Eaton Invue ARBORtest f erent type of paths that has Utterslev Mose Utterslev has that paths of erenttype f er di f erent possibilities with symmet f er a family of LED lu LED of family a er f er colour temper colour er ------Figure 63 Figure62.Sensor Figure 61

BOLLARD TESTING and 67where thedi pathwaysSymmetric,ﬁgurein as asymmetric 66 pathways65, ﬁgureB1 in and as and 64 B2 use to ,considering Mose Utterslev of paths of type the shown images fourth next The Utterslev mose, asymmetricandsymmetricopticswere selectedtobetested. able in di test it in DIALUX in order to study the illuminance on the ground level. The product is avail to necessary was it design, the for solution possible another EATONas considering After f erent optics and settings. Therefore after looking at the variety of paths found in Figure 64 Figure 65 f erence withthepathslevels ishighly pronounced. Figure 67 Figure 66 -

BOLLARD TESTING TEST 2 path widthhasbeentaken as3meters. 1070mm.The and 914mm available: is luminaire the that heights the of two in done was ground level and for face recognition. To deﬁned the height of the light source the ﬁrst test on illuminances analyse to Dialux in done was model 3D simple a luminaries the Totest Source Height:914mm 3D False colour: Lux ground level: Lux distributuiononaplanview: -Asymmetricintwodi f erent height: Lux Semy-cylindrical h:1,75:

BOLLARD TESTING vue Arbor, inorder tochoosethe luminaire thatwouldbeinthedesign. In Eaton’s and CitySwan resultsbetween dialux the evaluated be would page next the On height was H.914mm. vantdi presentrelenot does heights both between averagelux resultsthe Dialux the at Looking Source Height:1070mm Lux distributuiononaplanview: 3D False colour: Lux ground level: f erences. Takenpreferenceswildlife,the disturb chosen account not the into do on Lux Semy-cylindrical h:1,75: - -

BOLLARD TESTING Symmetric TEST 3 pathway minimizingtheamount oflightthata ed in double pathways. This position of the bollards gather the majority of the light on the Another test was carried out to test symmetric optics for luminaires when they are locat Source Height:914mm H: 914 f ects directly towildlife. -

BOLLARD TESTING (See Conceptualcatalogue next page) done.been has catalogue conceptual a optics symetric or asymetric use to when know to order In Mose.Utterslev in lakes the of paths surrounding the on placed be would bollard This design. the for asset elegible the as ARBOR make possibilities control high the and project.However, design,the ratingthe distribution light and powerconsumption between this of works futur the of part be would it possibility model.That the in account into taken o can Invue Eaton that possibilities o still CitySwan km, per watts with complemented and up summed are results Dialux were 68 Figure at Looking COMPARISON Invue Arbor CitySwan Eaton’s f ers a 56,25% less in power consumption. However the dimming the However consumption. power in less 56,25% a ers Luminous ﬂuxoftheluminaire Watts perkm Number of luminaire perkm Average Luxonfacelevel Average Luxonground level Height ofsource Distance betweenbollards Luminous e Luminous e Power Luminous ﬂuxoftheluminaire Watts perkm Number ofluminaire perkm Average Luxonfacelevel Average Luxonground level Height ofsource Distance betweenbollards Luminous e Luminous e Power

f er to reduce the power consumption, it has not been not has it consumption, power the reduce to er f f f f Figure 68

ciency cacy ciency cacy

0,9m 10,0m 6,6% 44,8lm/w 16,0 W 717,0lm 700 W/km 100luminaires/km 4,3lx 95,6lx 1,07m 10,0m 7,9% 54,3lm/w 7,0 W 380,0lm 1600 W/km 100 luminaires/km 0,26lx 5,24lx

BOLLARD TESTING slev Mose. di *The CONCEPTUAL CATALOGUE - Where tousesymmetricandasymmetric? ASYMMETRIC SYMMETRIC Per Km:1600W/km E E Lumen: 717lm Consumption: 16W Distance: 10m der 300mm*. un or level ground pathway di no with Double Per Km:1600W/km E E Lumen: 717lm Consumption: 16W Distance: 10m over 300mm. level ground di pathways a with double Single pathways and f f f f f erence on ground level set up at 300mm is due measurements onside at di at onside measurements due is 300mm at up set level ground on erence ciency: 6,6% cacy: 44,8lm/W ciency: 6,6% cacy: 44,8lm/W f f rne in erence erencein - f erence paths in Utter in paths erence -

BOLLARD TESTING can beseenonFigure 69.next page. di the show images following The zone. each lit to way suitable most the find to order in ed di the observe to is step First the luminariesintheseareas. distribute to how or on poles between distance the be should produceswhat study to and groundlevel that illuminance the observe to DIALUX in tested was luminaire mast This design. EATONfamily from ARBOR’s is areas exercise and playgrounds for luminaire The MAST Testing f erent Zones where mast luminares should be placed..The specifications of the productthe of specifications placed..The erentbe Zonesluminaresshould where mast f erent playgournds and exercice zones where light is need is light where zones exercice and playgourndserent -

MAST TESTING Eaton Invue ARBORSinglepole

3.000mm on next page. seen be can They possibilities. optics the of each in carried out to study how performs ARBOR Single pole To reach at this conclusion several tests in Dialux was gives similarilluminances by using21W. e higher slightly a has CitySwan Although 13,7%. with CitySwan-Basic e an with position ond sec in is Arbor analyses, the in studied Swan-Basic City and Park Phililp with luminaire consumption. this Comparing power the minimized to possibilities rangewide with controlequipped of is pole single the lighting for Utterslev Mose. As the bollards luminaries, and exercise zones in order playground to lit complement the to bollard asset good a is Pole Single ARBOR f ciency, it is using 24W when Arbor when 24W using is ciency,it f iny f 34, right-after 13,4%, of ciency - -

BOLLARD TESTING Luminaires are inadistanceof30meters. this luminaire. (Conceptcatalogue for SinglePole can beseenonnext page) develop the second concept catalogue to guide how should be lit each of the to areas help by using that cases interesting most the of color false in 3Dmodel the shown images Next tion onground level andtostudywhichonewouldsatisfyinabetterway theusers needs. distribu illuminance observe to DIALUXplace optic took right tests the choose orderto In E E Wattage:21W L.Flux:1930lm L.Flux:1941lm L.Flux:1941lm E E Wattage:24W L.Flux:2011lm E E Wattage:24W E E Wattage:24W L.Flux:1708lm ARB-B1-LED -D1-T5-8030 ARB-B1-LED -D1-T3-8030 ARB-B1-LED -D1-T4-8030 ARB-B1-LED -D1-T2-8030 f f f f f f f f ciency: 13,4% cacy: 91,9lm/w ciency: 12,2% cacy: 83,8lm/W ciency: 11,9% cacy: 80,9lm/w ciency: 10,4% cacy: 71,2lm/w -

MAST TESTING Optics TYPE -V Optics TYPE II-III-IV CONCEPTUAL CATALOGUE -Guidancefor selectingoptics the otherluminares studiedintheanalyses whenthey are arranged inaline. *The calculation of power consumption per Km, has been done in order to have the possibility to compare with *Per Km:816 W 10,5- 12,3% E 71,2-83,8lm/W E 1708-2011 Lumen: 24W Consumption: be spread radially. to required is light when use be will V, activity.the type The areathe whereon is distribution possible light the as much as adjust that optic prefer ence in selecting the a is There *Per Km:714 W/km 13,4% E 91,9 lm/W E 1930 Lumen: 21W Consumption: activities zones. the of distribution and position the on depending selected be will types this one of area, cercise ex or a playground of middle the in luminaires avoid placing is to possible when Always f f f f ciency: cacy: ciency: cacy: lm lm - -

MAST TESTING possibilities. W 14.067 The totalamountofpower consumptionusedonly for luminariesinthedesignwouldbe: The totalamountofluminariesthatwouldbeneedfor thedesignare: will becompared withFælledparken andSøndermakren. shows the total power consumption that would be used in Utterselv Mose. On next page it used.table Nextis disposition luminare,opticsand of type which on depending wildlife in be energy e to relation in been has Mose Utterslev for design lighting the in used strategy whole The 6.5 EVALUATION MAST BOLLARDS E Lumen perluminaire: Power perluminaire: 21-24W Total number ofmast:7 trol possibilitieswhichitwoulddecrease theamountofpower consumption) Total watts: 13.920 W E Power perluminaire: 16 W Lumen perluminaire: 717,0lm Total numberofBollards: 870luminaries Total Path Km:8,7km possibilities whichitwoulddecrease theamountofpower consumption) Total watts: 147W f f ciency: 10,5-13,4% ciency: 6,6% where it should be subtracted the power that could be reduce by the control the by reduce be could that power the subtracted be should it where f cient at the same time that can cover users needs and minimize the impact (from the total would be need to be apply the reduction on the control (from the total would need to be applied the reduction on the con 1708-2011lm -

EVALUATION the consumptionofeachtypeperkmandtotalpark. shows table next area,green each of consumption total the comparing Therefore,when naries, even thoughtheMastluminariesare occasionally placed. lumi of types both in W/km studied been has mast,it bollardsand used is it cases all in since each green area has a consumes,di luminaire of type each that kilometre per watts of amount the studied been e the compare and evaluate to able be to order In E Total: 1.563 W/km Total kmlit:9km Total power:14.067 W usedinUtterslev Mose. Power perluminaire: 21W______Lumen perluminaire 3614lm Total numberofMast:7luminaries Power perluminaire: 16W______Lumen perluminaire: 717,0lm Total numberofBollards: 870luminaries UTTERSLEV MOSE E Total: 420 W/km Total kmlit: 3,5km. Total power: 1.471 W usedinSøndermarken. Power perluminaire:24W______Lumen perluminaire 2260lm Total number ofMast:26luminaries Power perluminaire: 7W______Lumen perluminaire: 380lm Total number ofBollards: 121luminaries SØNDERMARKEN E Total:2473,7w/km Total kmlit: 3’5km. Total power: 8.658 W usedinFælledparken. Power perluminaire:58W______Lumen perluminaire 3614lm Total numberofMast:45luminaries Power perluminaire: 27W______Lumen perluminaire: 617,0lm Total numberofBollards: 224luminaries FÆLLEDPARKEN f f f ciency: 6,8% ciency: 10,4% ciency: 5,01% f erent amount of square meters and paths lit. Moreover, as

f ciency between green areas, it has it areas, green between ciency Per Km: 2088,0 W/km Per KM: 1.809 W/km Per Km: 714,0 W/km Per KM: 1.600 W/km Per Km: 792 W/km Per KM: 469 W/km

EVALUATION ters tothepathway. me closer the illuminate slightly which bollards, ARBOR asymmetric the of level ground o still but impact aerial the avoid to used been not has technique this Mose Utterslev in park, the in tough upwords back-lighting in Søndermarken o Evenwildlife. for areas dark leave to order in paths main the only illuminated been has it luminaries on pathways reducing like bollarsthis the aerial impact of mast luminaries. using Moreover,by wildlife consider has system lighting Mose Utterslev least, not but Last Wildlife using less Watts perkilometerthaninFælledparken. without dark spaces and due the high e path whole the cover to system the allow bollards the between 10meters to distance the o is Mose Utterslev that one the than homogeneous less still is it result the but distribution even more a have Fælledparken, in used Park Philips and luminaire di more it makes that contrast high a produce illuminances the of distribution this Moreover mast. or bollards two the between in lux 1 under spaces darker leaves It and luminaries to closer meters e least the be will o is system each that distribution lighting the Observing Users’ needs will make decrease thewattage percentage ofthelightingsystem. which sensors,..etc.), (dimming, possibilities control the account into taken not has Mose than Søndermarken. Although, It is important to mention that the calculations for Utterslev e design higher lighting with the evaluate Mose to Utterslev possible of is It page, previous the on table the at Looking E f ciency f er some information of the surrounding thanks to the light distribution on the on distribution light the to thanks surrounding the of information some er f cient its light distribution gather higher illuminance values on the ﬁrst the on valuesilluminance higher gather distribution light its cient f cult for the visual adaptation process. On the other hand , ERCO , hand other the On process. adaptation visual the for cult f ciency than Fælledparken, but still 3,6% less e less 3,6% still but Fælledparken, than ciency f cency of the luminaries the overall system is still f ers a safty feeling to users when walking f ering to users, Søndermarken users, to ering f ering. Reducing ering. f cient -

EVALUATION portant roll inthedesigntoachieve thegoal. However, inthisproject thegoalwas mainly eters andall dependsonwhat you want tocollect. Then, thatparameter hasamore im users needs. This , aseverything, isamatterofchoiceandpreferences. There are param is 6,8%. Itislesse As mentionintheevaluation, thee e as aresult alighting designabletofindagoodbalancebetweenthethree parameters of ing thetechnique. Itstudiedandtestnewmaterialsinthemarket anditpermittogive ing thesamematerialthatItisalready inuse, thesituationcan beimproved justchange Having toolstoplay with, thedesignprocess was simplified. Itstudiedwhathappenifus at thesametimethatisminimizingimpact inwildlife by reducing theaerialpollution. ing bollards thelight distributionisfocused mainly onthepathway tocover users needs in green areas, can give agoodcombinationofe analysis ofthisproject It was possibletocollect thattheusageoftwotypeluminaries Considering thattheanalysis isacollector oftoolsandtipsfor your design. From the needs are satisfiedandhow istherelation betweenthelightingsystem andnature. illuminance levels ineacharea. Moreover, thestudygive thechancetoobserve how users di Without technical measurements Itisimpossibletoprove orcompare thee ple’s voice. people to cover their needs. For the same principal this projects took in consideration peo alwayslisten becausemunicipality is that and city the parksinside of amount high a have Copenhageners give. municipality and ask door.They their to next right nature of variety more want they and it in time spend to like it.They appreciate and it respectnature. They with engaged being as citizens Danish the of impression an gave survey it.The in have to prefer would or likethink, people what and area each experience users how about inputs eriksberg municipalities. Starting from a photographic report and a survey it gave the first di the observe to allow collection data The to observe andtostudyhow green areas are lit. information gather by started process the system,whyreason lighting right the design to lighting in green areas had to be done. Carrying out a good analyses can become essential currentthe previousMose,of Utterslevanalysesa forsystem lighting a design orderto In 7. CONCLUSION f f ciency, users andwildlife. erent green areas. For that, luxmeasurements were necessaryinorder tostudythe “How todesignalightingsystem for Utterslev Mose toimprove the “When designingsomethingfor peopleisessentialtolistenpeople” “When lighting e “Observe thespace, take measurements andmake itbetter” f cient thanSøndermarken, butItisbetterin lightdistributioncovering f ciency whilecovering citizensneedsandconsidering f ciency obtainfrom theUtterslev Mose lightingdesign wildlife? “ f erent green areas in Copenhagen and Fred and Copenhagen in areas green erent f ciency , needsandwildlife. user’s Us f ciency ofthe ------

CONCLUSION to carry outany typeofestimation. no answer about any approximation cost of each type of luminaries and It was impossible manufacturewebsite.Unfortunately,the on speciﬁed not is therewas it since luminaries, the of cost about information the gathering in attempt an was There budget. Finally,the lection of colours to study how well this colour transitions performs is another future task. Additionally and related to the intelligent lighting, programming the codes to deﬁne the se test all these possibilities and to observe how each of the changes a to be would project this of design improvethe to relevanttask consumption.A energy the single o pole, and bollard ARBOR , used luminaries the phase, design the during mentioned As design thathasbeenpresented inthisproject. This section mention possible works that would help to improve the Utterslev Mose lighting 8. FUTURE WORKS f er a wide range of control possibilities to improve the lighting system and reduce and system lighting the improve to possibilities control of range wide a er f ect the consumption. -

FUTURE WORKS 9. ANNEX

9.1.SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

1. What is your age? 2. About how often do you go to the park? 3. When going to the park, which is your usual activity? 4. Around what time do you usually go to the park? 5. How well do you think are the paths lit in the park? 6. How safe do you feel when you visit the park when there is no daylight? 7. Do you know that there is a park called Søndermarken in Frederiksberg that ofers a possibility of using an interactive lighting system to complete an speciﬁc route? Have you ever used it and how often? 8. When you think about the interactive lighting system, do you think of it as something people is happy about it or not? 9. If you had the possibility to improve something of Fælledparken what it would be? 10. Observations:

9.2 REFERENCES

[1] - Survey - https://da.surveymonkey.com [2] - Copenhagen master plan http://data.kk.dk/dataset/025cd497-a6d2-47ee-ab6d-0b7df5e02bc9/resource/ c826ce6a-1c76-4a73-bd2d-fd7719d8d011/download/belysningsmasterplan-ko- benhavn-del-1-fornyelsesprojektet.pdf [3] -http://www.dn.dk/Default.aspx?ID=30777

9.3 LINKS https://da.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fælledparken http://www.dn.dk/Default.aspx?ID=30785 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_height http://docplayer.dk/2491322-Natten-i-byens-lys-forslag-til-en-belysningsstrategi-for- koebenhavn.html http://cordis.europa.eu/fp7/ict/photonics/docs/ssl-cip/lighting-the-cities_en.pdf http://isites.harvard.edu/fs/docs/icb.topic549691.files/Your_Methods_Section.pdf http://users.clas.ufl.edu/msscha/ThesisCSS/thesis_methods.html http://www.docs.hss.ed.ac.uk/iad/Postgraduate/PhD_researchers/Writing/3_Methodolo- gy.pdf https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/01/ https://www.google.dk/search?q=palette+of+green+colors&client=safari&rls=en&- source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwixsdDypqrMAhUEiSwKHW3_Bc4Q_AUIByg- B&biw=1264&bih=680#imgrc=HEhsisY0IbqWTM%3A https://www.google.dk/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bs-la.dk%2Fwww.bs-la. dk%2F2011_CS_RUNNING_files%2Fshapeimage_9.png&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2F- www.bs-la.dk%2Fwww.bs-la.dk%2F2011_CS_RUNNING.html&docid=gSAHtmYd8pITG- M&tbnid=wWn5TBGGAm0qzM%3A&w=860&h=613&itg=1&client=safari&bih=680&bi- w=1264&ved=0ahUKEwiNvtGy1qfMAhXBWCwKHWRlBMwQMwh4KFIwUg&iact=m- rc&uact=8 http://www.christianshavnernet.dk/Christianshavn/Havnefronten/Oerestad/ http://www.dn.dk/Files/Filer/Oplev_naturen/www_fredninger_dk/oestre_anlaeg_kbh.pdf http://www.dn.dk/Default.aspx?ID=30777 http://slks.dk/slotte-ejendomme-og-haver/skal-slettes/drift-af-kulturejendomme/drift/ slotshaver/frederiksberg-have-og-soendermarken/planlaeg-besoeg/ http://www.cisternerne.dk/om-cisternerne/sondermarken.html http://ghb-landskab.dk/en/projects/life-and-light-in-soendermarken#mere http://slks.dk/slotte-ejendomme-og-haver/projekter/afsluttede-projekter/projekt-liv-og- lys-i-soendermarken/ http://www.priess.dk/master-arkitekttegnet/cityswan/cityswan-basic http://download.p4c.philips.com/lfb/f/fp-910502610226/fp-910502610226_pgl_en_ aa_001.pdf http://download.p4c.philips.com/lfb/c/comf-1198/comf-1198_pss_en_aa_001.pdf http://www.nheolis.de/pdf/343-021_Final%20Report_Development%20CO2%20neu- tral%20hybrid%20street%20lighting.pdf http://www.boston.com/weather/weather-wisdom/2014/06/20/summer_begins_sol- stice_occurs https://www.google.dk/imgres?imgurl=http%3A%2F%2Fi.kinja-img.com%2F- gawker-media%2Fimage%2Fupload%2Ftpexxxero6zwp6tc9tmr.jpg&imgrefurl=http%3A%2F%2Fio9.gizmodo.com%2Fheres-what-happens-to-the-earth-during-summer-solstice-1593675122&docid=k3rXT7C84V4U1M&tbnid=SH-rA9vNp- sufeM%3A&w=700&h=541&client=safari&bih=680&biw=1240&ved=0ahUKEwj504G6xc- 3MAhXFfywKHZRbDH44ZBAzCBwoGTAZ&iact=mrc&uact=8 http://www.windows2universe.org/the_universe/uts/winter.html http://www.prettyyourworld.com/colortheory.html http://www.fredninger.dk/dnressources/Turkort_Utterslev_Mose.pdf http://www.fredninger.dk/fredning/utterslev-mose/ http://www.dn.dk/Default.aspx?ID=43058 http://www.watercolour.tv/search.php?keyword=trees http://industriallightingfixtures.org/LED-Professional-Sports-Lighter-LED-SL60-Series. pdf http://www.cooperindustries.com/content/dam/public/lighting/products/documents/invue/spec_sheets/invue-abb-arbor-bollard-td501002en-sss.pdf http://www.cooperindustries.com/content/dam/public/lighting/products/documents/invue/brochures/invue-arbor-brochure-bro.pdf http://webtools.cooperindustries.com/lighting/iesFiles/index.cfm?brand=In- VUE&dir=PATHWAY/ABB&_ga=1.166438526.1701689961.1463608270 http://www.cooperindustries.com/content/public/en/lighting/products/bollards/_874567.ssd.html