DOCSLIB.ORG

En En Amendments

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

European Parliament 2014-2019 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 2018/0254(COD) 14.9.2018 AMENDMENTS 99 - 457 Draft report Zdzisław Krasnodębski (PE625.510v01-00) Establishing the European Defence Fund Proposal for a regulation (COM(2018)0476 – C8-0268/2018 – 2018/0254(COD)) AM\1162781EN.docx PE627.775v01-00 EN United in diversity EN AM_Com_LegReport PE627.775v01-00 2/186 AM\1162781EN.docx EN Amendment 99 Christelle Lechevalier Proposal for a regulation – Proposal for rejection The European Parliament rejects [the Commission proposal]. Or. fr Justification This programme is the industrial component of a desire to establish an illegitimate European defence. The implicit objective is to make our industries and armies interdependent. Without the know-how needed to fully implement military-industrial projects, our nations would be interdependent, to the detriment of non-negotiable national sovereignty in the field of defence. The enormous sums allocated to this project could be saved. Amendment 100 Rolandas Paksas Proposal for a regulation – Proposal for rejection The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal. Or. lt Amendment 101 Jens Geier, Martina Werner, Arne Lietz, Constanze Krehl Proposal for a regulation – Proposal for rejection The European Parliament rejects the Commission proposal. AM\1162781EN.docx 3/186 PE627.775v01-00 EN Or. en Justification There are serious doubts about the legal basis for the Programme. The Commission chose art. 173 TFEU as a legal basis for the regulation, together with art. 182, 183 and 184 TFEU. This neglects that the Programme has two different, but in the proposal clearly mentioned, goals, one being the competiveness and innovation capacity of the defence industry, the other being the improvement of the "strategic autonomy" of the Union (art. 3(1)). Art. 173 and the other articles omit the second goal of the programme. As both goals are inextricably linked and none could be identified as inferior, the programme would need to have a dual or different legal basis. This is supported by ECJ ruling C-411/06 which clearly points out that a dual legal basis has to be taken as a starting point when two purposes are equal to each other. Amendment 102 Rolandas Paksas Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 1 Draft legislative resolution Amendment 1. Adopts its position at first reading 1. The European Parliament rejects hereinafter set out; the Commission proposal; Or. en Amendment 103 Rolandas Paksas Draft legislative resolution Paragraph 2 Draft legislative resolution Amendment 2. Calls on the Commission to refer 2. Calls on the Commission to the matter to Parliament again if it withdrawn its proposal; replaces, substantially amends or intends to substantially amend its proposal; Or. en Amendment 104 Neoklis Sylikiotis, Marisa Matias, Miguel Viegas, João Ferreira, João Pimenta Lopes, Sofia Sakorafa, Xabier Benito Ziluaga, Sabine Lösing, Cornelia Ernst PE627.775v01-00 4/186 AM\1162781EN.docx EN Proposal for a regulation Title 0 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment Proposal for a Rejects the proposal for a REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL establishing the European Defence Fund establishing the European Defence Fund (Text with EEA relevance) (Text with EEA relevance) Or. en Justification The prior aim of the regulation is the development of EU - defence capabilities in the framework of CSDP/CFSP. According to Article 41 (2) TEU any expenditure arising from actions having military or defence implications must not be charged to the Union budget. Therefor the legal reference to Article 173(3), 182(4) and the second paragraph of 188 TFEU must not apply. The establishment of the Defence Fund will further militarise the European Union and its policies and contradicts the Union as peace maker and mediator in conflicts. Amendment 105 Gunnar Hökmark Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) In the European Defence Action (1) In the European Defence Action Plan, adopted on 30 November 2016, the Plan, adopted on 30 November 2016, the Commission committed to complement, Commission committed to complement, leverage and consolidate collaborative leverage and consolidate collaborative efforts by Member States in developing efforts by Member States in developing defence technological and industrial defence technological and industrial capabilities to respond to security capabilities to respond to security challenges, as well as to foster a challenges, as well as to foster a competitive, innovative and efficient competitive, innovative and efficient European defence industry. It proposed in defence industry in Europe by securing a particular to launch a European Defence competitive environment for research and Fund (the 'Fund') to support investments in innovation. It proposed in particular to joint research and the joint development of launch a European Defence Fund (the defence products and technologies, thus 'Fund') to support investments in joint fostering synergies and cost-effectiveness, research and the joint development of and to promote the Member States’ joint defence products and technologies, thus purchase and maintenance of defence fostering synergies and cost-effectiveness, AM\1162781EN.docx 5/186 PE627.775v01-00 EN equipment. This Fund would complement and to promote the Member States’ joint national funding already used for this purchase and maintenance of defence purpose and should act as an incentive for equipment. This Fund would complement Member States to cooperate and invest national funding already used for this more in defence. The Fund would support purpose and should act as an incentive for cooperation during the whole cycle of Member States to cooperate and invest defence products and technologies. more in defence. The Fund would support cooperation during the whole cycle of defence products and technologies. Or. en Amendment 106 Jens Geier, Martina Werner, Arne Lietz, Constanze Krehl Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) In the European Defence Action (1) In the European Defence Action Plan, adopted on 30 November 2016, the Plan, adopted on 30 November 2016, the Commission committed to complement, Commission committed to complement, leverage and consolidate collaborative leverage and consolidate collaborative efforts by Member States in developing efforts by Member States in developing defence technological and industrial defence technological and industrial capabilities to respond to security capabilities to respond to security challenges, as well as to foster a challenges, as well as to foster a competitive, innovative and efficient competitive, innovative and efficient European defence industry. It proposed in European defence industry. It proposed in particular to launch a European Defence particular to launch a European Defence Fund (the 'Fund') to support investments in Fund (the 'Fund') to support investments in joint research and the joint development of joint research and the joint development of defence products and technologies, thus defence products and technologies, thus fostering synergies and cost-effectiveness, fostering synergies and cost-effectiveness, and to promote the Member States’ joint and to promote the Member States’ joint purchase and maintenance of defence purchase and maintenance of defence equipment. This Fund would complement equipment. This Fund would complement national funding already used for this national funding already used for this purpose and should act as an incentive for purpose and should act as an incentive for Member States to cooperate and invest Member States to cooperate. The Fund more in defence. The Fund would support would support cooperation during the cooperation during the whole cycle of whole cycle of defence products and defence products and technologies. technologies, as well as conversion from military to civil production. Or. en PE627.775v01-00 6/186 AM\1162781EN.docx EN Amendment 107 Rolandas Paksas Proposal for a regulation Recital 1 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (1) In the European Defence Action (1) In the European Defence Action Plan, adopted on 30 November 2016, the Plan, adopted on 30 November 2016, the Commission committed to complement, Commission committed to complement, leverage and consolidate collaborative leverage and consolidate collaborative efforts by Member States in developing efforts by Member States in developing defence technological and industrial defence technological and industrial capabilities to respond to security capabilities to respond to security challenges, as well as to foster a challenges, as well as to foster a competitive, innovative and efficient competitive, innovative and efficient European defence industry. It proposed in European defence industry. It proposed in particular to launch a European Defence particular to launch a European Defence Fund (the 'Fund') to support investments in Fund (the 'Fund') to support investments in joint research and the joint development of joint research and the joint development of defence products and technologies, thus defence products and technologies, thus fostering synergies and cost-effectiveness, fostering synergies and cost-effectiveness, and to promote the Member States’ joint and to promote the Member States’ joint purchase and maintenance of defence purchase and maintenance of defence equipment. This Fund would complement equipment. This Fund would
Recommended publications
  • Time for the European Commission to Legislate on Collective Redress

    Time for the European Commission to Legislate on Collective Redress

    Mr Jean-Claude Juncker President of the Commission Mrs Vera Jourová Commissioner The Consumer Voice in Europe European Commission Rue de la Loi 200 B – 1049 Brussels Ref.: BEUC-X-2017-107 10 October 2017 Subject: Time for the European Commission to legislate on collective redress Dear President Juncker, Dear Commissioner Jourová, I write on behalf of BEUC, The European Consumer Organisation, to ask you to propose a binding legislative measure on collective redress. Consumer rights at EU level have come a long way over the last 20 years. However, the inability of consumers to band together to claim their rights when they have suffered detriment is one of the missing pieces of the jigsaw for EU consumers to access justice. As you are aware, Volkswagen has steadfastly refused to compensate consumers in Europe affected by the emissions scandal. This is in stark contrast to their response in the United States, where the threat of class action has proved decisive in delivering compensation for affected consumers. In your State of the Union speech a few days ago, you said that you are “shocked when consumers are knowingly and deliberately misled” and that you “call on the car industry to come clean and make it right”. We know that despite Commissioner Jourova’s efforts, which we appreciate, the company still refuses to put things right. Since the scandal broke over two years ago, VW remains adamant it will not compensate European car owners. It is now in your hands to decide whether in the future European consumers who have been victims of fraud on a large scale, or who have suffered from a trader’s unfair or illegal practices, should have a realistic chance to be compensated.
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast

    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
  • 2018-09-05 Liste Mdep

    2018-09-05 Liste Mdep

    hat am 5. Juli 2018 für/gegen das Verhandlungsmandat zur Urheberrechts-Richtlinie Abgeordnete*r Postadresse Mailadresse Partei gestimmt Europabüro Jens Geier MdEP, Severinstraße 44, GEIER, Jens (SPD) 45127 Essen [email protected] SPD Europabüro Petra Kammerevert MdEP, Kavalleriestr. 16, 40213 KAMMEREVERT, Petra (SPD) Düsseldorf [email protected] SPD Willy-Brandt-Ring 1, 52477 KOHN, Arndt (SPD) Alsdorf [email protected] SPD Prof. Dr. Dietmar Köster, MdEP, Königstraße 69a, KÖSTER, Prof. Dr. Dietmar (SPD) 58300 Wetter (Ruhr) [email protected] SPD Europabüro Gelsenkirchen, Gabelsbergerstr. 15, PREUSS, Gabriele (SPD) 45879 Gelsenkirchen [email protected] SPD Europabüro Birgit Sippel MdEP, Ulricherstraße 26 - SIPPEL, Birgit (SPD) 28, 59494 Soest [email protected] SPD Regionalbüro Terry Reintke, MdEP, Ebertstraße 28, 45879 REINTKE, Terry (B90/Die Grünen) Gelsenkirchen [email protected] Grüne Martin Schirdewan, Steinstraße 29, 46446 SCHIRDEWAN, Martin (Die Linke) Emmerich [email protected] Die Linke Parlement européen, bât. Altiero Spinelli 04F158, 60, rue Wiertz, 1047 Bruxelles, PRETZELL, Markus (Die blaue Partei) Belgien [email protected] blaue partei Europabüro Sven Giegold MdEP, Oststraße 41-43, D- GIEGOLD, Sven (B90/Die Grünen) 40211 Düsseldorf [email protected] B90/Die Grünen Wahlkreisbüro Elmar Brok, Turnerstrasse 5–9, 33602 BROK, Elmar (CDU) Bielefeld [email protected] CDU - Groß Opholt, 47506 FLORENZ, Karl-Heinz (CDU) Neukirchen-Vluyn [email protected] CDU - Europabüro für Südwestfalen, Le-Puy-Str. LIESE, Dr. Peter (CDU) 17, 59872 Meschede [email protected] CDU Europabüro Münster, Mauritzstraße 4–6, 48143 PIEPER, Dr.
  • Supported Amendments

    Supported Amendments

    Amendment 135 Petra Kammerevert, Victor Negrescu, Jens Geier, Ibán García Del Blanco, Domènec Ruiz Devesa, Marcos Ros Sempere, Hannes Heide, Łukasz Kohut, Massimiliano Smeriglio, Predrag Fred Matić, Lara Wolters, Vilija Blinkevičiūtė, Niklas Nienaß, Martina Michels Proposal for a regulation Recital 4 Text proposed by the Commission Amendment (4) The outbreak of the COVID-19 (4) The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic in early 2020 changed the pandemic in early 2020 changed the economic outlook for the years to come in economic outlook for the years to come in the Union and in the world, calling for an the Union and in the world, calling for an urgent and coordinated response from the urgent and coordinated response from the Union in order to cope with the enormous Union in order to cope with the enormous economic and social consequences for all economic and social consequences for all Member. The challenges linked to the Member. The challenges linked to the demographic context have been amplified demographic context, social inclusion and by COVID-19. The current COVID-19 social cohesion have been amplified by pandemic as well as the previous COVID-19. The current COVID-19 economic and financial crisis have shown pandemic as well as the previous that developing sound and resilient economic and financial crisis have shown economies and financial systems built on that developing sound and resilient strong economic and social structures economies and financial systems built on helps Member States to respond more strong economic and social structures efficiently to shocks and recover more helps Member States to respond more swiftly from them.
  • Special Report

    Special Report

    SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held.
  • Open Letter to Ms. Ursula Von Der Leyen, President, European Commission and Executive Vice President Commissioner Timmermans

    Open Letter to Ms. Ursula Von Der Leyen, President, European Commission and Executive Vice President Commissioner Timmermans

    Friday 10 July 2021 Open letter to Ms. Ursula von der Leyen, President, European Commission and Executive Vice President Commissioner Timmermans Call for a massive acceleration of capacity build-up of renewable energy in Europe Dear President von der Leyen, Dear Executive Vice President Timmermans A successful transformation towards climate neutrality fundamentally rests on a European approach towards the massive acceleration of renewable energy deployment for industrial transformation. As a unique alliance between Members of the European Parliament and CEOs from leading companies, which have pledged climate neutrality by 2050, we are jointly calling upon the Commission to show more ambition and determination when it comes to making Europe’s energy system fit, already for 2030. All planned policies and measures being decided now are paving the road to climate neutrality in 2050, and that is why today’s action counts. Today, a massive ramp-up of renewable energy production must ensure that the EU renewable energy system is operational as soon as possible. Although EU’s Renewed Industrial strategy falls short in this regard, with the upcoming legislative package we have another chance to set this right. If the EU is to be a front runner for climate friendly manufacturing through the deployment of low carbon process technologies and ground-breaking innovations, the key enablers are infrastructure, access to abundant renewable electricity supply and rapid commercialization of new processes at competitive energy prices. Without a stronger European policy focus and increased investments boosting the availability of renewables for industrial use, we not only risk delaying needed GHG reductions, affecting industrial competitiveness but also our overall credibility to deliver on our common commitments.
  • Hessen in Europa 4/2016 (PDF / 286

    Hessen in Europa 4/2016 (PDF / 286

    Ausgabe 04/2016 ZUKUNFT EUROPAS Ministerpräsident Bouffier zu Gesprächen über Brexit in Brüssel - Hessischer Jahresempfang 2016 Kurz nach der Entscheidung der Briten, die EU zu verlassen, führte der Hessische Ministerpräsident Volker Bouffier Gespräche zum Brexit. Bei einem Gespräch mit dem inzwischen auch für die EU-Finanzdienstleistungspolitik zuständigen Vizepräsidenten der Europäischen Kommission Valdis Dombrovskis warb Bouffier um die bisher in London ansässige EU-Bankenaufsichtsbehörde. Die Bankenaufsicht sollte ihren Platz am größten Finanzplatz der EU haben und dieser sei nach dem Brexit Frankfurt. Weiter. Am Vorabend der Gespräche fand der diesjährige Hessische Jahresempfang statt. Auf Einladung des Ministerpräsidenten und der Hessischen Europaministerin Lucia Puttrich hielt der Bundesminister für Ernährung und Landwirtschaft Christian Schmidt die Festrede. Rund 400 Gäste waren der Einladung gefolgt. Hier geht es zur Fotogalerie. Zeit der Unsicherheit nach Brexit-Entscheidung prognostiziert An Tag eins nach dem Referendum in Großbritannien sprach der Historiker und Präsident des European Strategy Forums Peter Ludlow über die Brexit-Entscheidung der Briten. Der Historiker bedauerte den Ausgang der Volksbefragung und sagte Jahre der politischen und wirtschaftlichen Unsicherheit voraus, während derer das Verhältnis Großbritanniens zur EU neu ausgehandelt werden müsse. Weiter. Eine europäische Avantgarde, die mit der Integration voranschreitet Auf populistische Forderungen müssen wir gemeinsame europäische Antworten formulieren.
  • European Parliament Made Simple

    European Parliament Made Simple

    THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT MADE SIMPLE 2014-2019 The European Parliament Made Simple is produced by the American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) as a introduction to the workings of the European Parliament for amateurs and experts alike. Production Team Editor and project manager Giovanni Mastrobuono Senior Communications Officer Editorial assistance Alexandrine Gauvin Communications Officer Eli Corso-Phinney Communications Intern The information contained in this publication has been compiled in good faith and is accurate according to the most recent sources available at the time of going to press. Photographs used with the kind permission of the Audiovisual Libraries of the European Commission, Council of the European Union and the European Parliament. First edition, 2014 ISBN: 978-2-9146856-7-2 Printed in Belgium American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham EU) Avenue des Arts 53, B-1000 Brussels Telephone: +32 (0)2 513 68 92 Fax: +32 (0)2 513 79 28 [email protected] www.amchameu.eu Foreword Susan Danger Managing Director American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union t is with great pleasure that I present AmCham EU’s newest guide, The European Parliament Made Simple. The Lisbon Treaty, signed in 2009, gave the European Parliament greater power in EU Idecision-making and an increased role in selecting and approving the European Commission. As a result, this year’s European election has a greater democratic influence than ever before. With this in mind, AmCham EU has published The European Parliament Made Simple to explain the Parliament’s expanded powers and roles, for both the Brussels policy community and public affairs professionals in the EU and US.
  • 5.9.2018 A8-0245/131 Amendment 131 Tiemo Wölken, Catherine

    5.9.2018 A8-0245/131 Amendment 131 Tiemo Wölken, Catherine

    5.9.2018 A8-0245/131 Amendment 131 Tiemo Wölken, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Kati Piri, Yana Toom, Monika Beňová, Tamás Meszerics, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Kerstin Westphal, Arne Lietz, Dietmar Köster, Adam Gierek, Krystyna Łybacka, Martina Werner, Bernd Lange, Peter Simon, Brando Benifei, Constanze Krehl, Jo Leinen, Jens Geier, Karoline Graswander-Hainz, Ulrike Rodust, Petra Kammerevert, Momchil Nekov, Daniele Viotti, Arndt Kohn, Michael Detjen, Gabriele Preuß, Maria Noichl, Iris Hoffmann, Ismail Ertug, Joachim Schuster, Paul Tang, Lidia Joanna Geringer de Oedenberg, Nessa Childers, Birgit Sippel, Evelyn Regner, Eugen Freund, Michel Reimon, Thomas Waitz, Monika Vana, Martin Sonneborn, Igor Šoltes, Jakop Dalunde, Cornelia Ernst, Molly Scott Cato, Alyn Smith, Max Andersson, Bodil Valero, Linnéa Engström, Martina Michels Report A8-0245/2018 Axel Voss Copyright in the Digital Single Market COM(2016)0593 – C8-0383/2016 – 2016/0280(COD) Proposal for a directive Recital 38 – paragraph 1 a (new) Text proposed by the Commission Amendment In accordance with Article 11(2), the responsibility of information society service providers pursuant to Article 13 should not extend to acts of hyperlinking in respect of press publications. Or. en AM\P8_AMA(2018)0245(131-136)_EN.docx PE624.050v01-00 EN United in diversity EN 5.9.2018 A8-0245/132 Amendment 132 Tiemo Wölken, Catherine Stihler, Josef Weidenholzer, Kati Piri, Yana Toom, Monika Beňová, Tamás Meszerics, Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann, Kerstin Westphal, Arne Lietz, Dietmar Köster, Adam Gierek,
  • Declaration Unfinished Justice: Restitution and Remembrance (Following European Conference on Restorative Justice Brussels, 26Th April 2017)

    Declaration Unfinished Justice: Restitution and Remembrance (Following European Conference on Restorative Justice Brussels, 26Th April 2017)

    26th June 2017 Declaration Unfinished Justice: Restitution and Remembrance (Following European Conference on Restorative Justice Brussels, 26th April 2017) Preamble It is now more than seventy years after the Holocaust (Shoah) in which six million Jews – seventy-five percent of the Jewish population of Europe – were murdered. Only a small fraction of private and communal immovable and movable property illegitimately seized from Jewish victims has been returned or compensated to rightful owners, heirs, or to the Jewish people at large. Many Holocaust survivors live in poverty and without adequate social care, and their social welfare needs are expanding rapidly as they age. In light of the above We, members of the European Parliament, affirm the moral responsibility of European Union member states to advance Holocaust-era property restitution. We also declare our enduring commitment to the provision of adequate and immediate social welfare support for Holocaust survivors, the demarcation, protection and preservation of Jewish cemeteries, mass graves and other burial sites, the preservation of Jewish heritage sites, and the promotion of Holocaust education, research and remembrance. We recognize the commitment of the European Parliament to restitution of Holocaust-era assets as called for in previous resolutions of the Parliament and reaffirm past international principles and declarations that reflect a consensus for the restitution of Holocaust-era assets. Considering the urgency of the matter We call upon Member States of the European Union to reaffirm their commitment to resolve remaining issues on restitution and compensation of looted property, in accordance with the principles of the Terezin Declaration on Holocaust Era Assets and Related Issues, and to address the growing social welfare needs of Holocaust survivors.
  • A SOUL for EUROPE Conference 2019 Towards a European Citizens’ Convention

    A SOUL for EUROPE Conference 2019 Towards a European Citizens’ Convention

    Under the high patronage of the European Parliament Conference Report, 12 & 13 April 2019 A SOUL FOR EUROPE Conference 2019 Towards a European Citizens’ Convention DAY 1: 12 April 2019, Akademie der Künste, Berlin Welcome & Introduction by Andreas Bock, A Soul for Europe Project Presentation by Matthias von Hülsen, Director of Krzyżowa Music Krzyżowa Music. Music for Europe Pablo Barragan, Karolina Errera, Alexander Kovalev, Olivier Robin, Lukas Stepp Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart Clarinet Quintet A-Dur, KV 581, First Movement: Allegro, Second Movement: Larghetto, Third Movement: Menuetto, Trio I – Trio II, Fourth Movement: Allegretto con Variazioni Under the high patronage of the European Parliament Evens Arts Prize Ceremony Welcome by Monique Canto-Sperber, Chairwoman of the Executive Committee, Evens Foundation Award Introduction by Ernest Van Buynder, President of the Jury Conversation with the Laureate Eszter Salamon and Cristina Grande, Head of Performing Arts, Serralves Foundation, Porto, Jury Member of the Evens Arts Prize 2019 Monique Canto-Sperber: Our founders have always been sensitive to the power of art to question our certitudes and rethink the world. The Evens Art Prize was created precisely to engage with the world around us. Art cannot be reduced to a functionality – a social pacifier, or a political catalyst. And we know from the past that it can be dangerous to align it to a political agenda. But art has the power to be transformative – it shapes our perceptions, representations, and attitudes; it changes our vision of the world, thus it changes the world ! Ernest Van Buynder: The jury has acknowledged Eszter Salamon’s ambitious and uncompromising work that explores contemporary issues touching upon what has been forgotten, excluded and repressed in western consciousness.
  • Unsere Erfolge 2014 BIS 2019 Dietmar Köster Tiemo Wölken Joachim Schuster Ulrike Rodust Knut Fleckenstein Iris Hoffmann Bernd Lange

    Unsere Erfolge 2014 BIS 2019 Dietmar Köster Tiemo Wölken Joachim Schuster Ulrike Rodust Knut Fleckenstein Iris Hoffmann Bernd Lange

    FÜR EIN STARKES, GERECHTES, Die SPD-AbgeordnetenDie SPD-Abgeordneten – Fraktion – Fraktion der der SozialdemokratenSozialdemokraten im Europäischen ParlamentParlament SOZIALES EUROPA Unsere Erfolge 2014 BIS 2019 Dietmar Köster Tiemo Wölken Joachim Schuster Ulrike Rodust Knut Fleckenstein Iris Hoffmann Bernd Lange Gabriele Preuss Susanne Melior SCHLESWIG- HOLSTEIN MECKLENBURG- VORPOMMERN Jens Geier Sylvia-Yvonne Kaufmann HAMBURG BREMEN NIEDERSACHSEN BRANDENBURG BERLIN Petra Kammerevert Arne lietz NORDRHEIN- WESTFALEN SACHSEN- ANHALT Birgit Sippel Constanze Krehl SACHSEN HESSEN THÜRINGEN Arndt Kohn RHEINLAND- Jakob von Weizsäcker PFALZ SAARLAND Martina Werner Kerstin Westphal BAYERN BADEN- WÜRTTEMBERG Norbert Neuser Ismail Ertug Udo Bullmann Maria Noichl Wir 27 Abgeordnete der SPD vertreten Bürgerinnen und Bürger aus allen Bundesländern Deutschlands im Europäischen Parlament in Straßburg und Brüssel. Jo Leinen Michael Detjen Peter Simon Evelyne Gebhardt Liebe Leserinnen unD Leser, Europa ist umkämpft. Nationalisten und Rechtsextremisten gewinnen an Raum. Aber Nationalismus ist keine Lösung für die aktuellen gesellschaftlichen Herausforderungen. Deswegen kämpfen Sozialdemokratinnen und Sozialdemokraten für Europa – ein starkes, faires und soziales Europa. Wir treten für ein starkes Europa ein, das solidarisch zusammensteht und Flagge zeigt für Frieden, Demokratie und Rechtsstaatlichkeit. Eine funktionierende EU, die für ihre Bürgerin- nen und Bürger arbeitet, in die Zukunft investiert und gute Arbeit und faire Regeln für alle schafft – das ist unser Ziel. Die EU ist eine Erfolgsgeschichte, die wir weiterdenken müssen. Herausforderungen wie der Klimawandel, globale Finanzkrisen oder die Digitalisierung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft lassen sich nur in der Zusammenarbeit der EU-Mitgliedsstaaten angehen. Wir Sozialdemokratinnen und Sozialdemokraten haben seit der Euro- pawahl 2014, trotz einer konservativen Mehrheit im Europäischen Parlament, sozialdemokratische Erfolge in der Europäischen Union errungen.