DOCSLIB.ORG

PNGOPRA Annual Research Report 2012

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PNGOPRA Annual Research Report 2012 Annual Research Report 2012 PNG Oil Palm Research Association Inc. Dami Research Station, P.O. Box 97, Kimbe, West New Britain Province 621, Papua New Guinea Tel +675 9854009 • Fax +675 9854040 • [email protected] 2012 Annual Research Report PNG Oil Palm Research Association INC © Copyright PNG OPRA 2013 2012 Annual Research Report Content CONTENTS Page CONTENTS a List of Tables d List of Figures g List of Plates j REPORT BY THE ACTING DIRECTOR OF RESEARCH I 1. AGRONOMY SECTION 1-1 Overview 1-1 Hargy Oil palm Limited 1-4 Summary 1-4 Trial 205: EFB x P x Mg x N Fertiliser Trial on Volcanic soils, Hargy 1-6 Trial 211: Systematic N Fertiliser Trial on Volcanic soils, Navo Estate 1-13 Trial 212: Systematic N Fertiliser Trial on Volcanic soils, Hargy Estate 1-18 Trial 214: Phosphorous (TSP) Fertiliser Placement Trial on Volcanic soils, Hargy Plantation 1-23 Trial 216: N x P x K Trial on Volcanic soils at Barema Plantation 1-28 Trial 217: N x P x K trial on Volcanic soils at Navo Estate, 1-31 Trial 220: N x P x K x Mg trial on Volcanic soils at Alaba Estate, 1-33 Smallholder Hargy Oil Palm Bialla 1-34 Overview 1-34 NEW BRITAIN PALM OIL LTD, WEST NEW BRITAIN 1-35 Trial 139: Palm Spacing Trial, Kumbango 1-35 NBPOL, Kula Group, Milne Bay Estates 1-40 Trial 517: New K placement trial at Maiwara Estate 1-40 Trial 516: New NxK trial at Maiwara Estate 1-42 Trial 513: Spacing and Thinning Trial, Padipadi 1-44 Trial 331 Spacing and Thinning Trial, Ambogo Estate, Higaturu Oil Palm 1-47 NBPOL, Kula Group, Popondetta 1-50 Trial 334: Nitrogen x Phosphorus Trial (Mature Phase) on Volcanic Ash Soils, Sangara Estate 1-50 Trial 335. Nitrogen x TSP Trial (Immature Phase) on Outwash Plains Soils, Ambogo Estate 1-54 Small Holder Research 1-62 Trial 218: Smallholder oil palm/food crop intercropping demo block, Kabaiya LSS (AIGS funded) 1-62 Trial 219: i) Smallholder Leaf Sampling, (RSPO 4.2, 4.3, 8.1) 1-66 Smallholder block selection and sampling 1-66 T219: ii) Smallholder Block Assessments 1-70 Smallholder Research Report in 2012, Oro Oil Palm Project 1-73 Trial 336: SMALL holder Leaf Sampling 1-74 Smallholder Block Assessments 1-75 Trial 337: Smallholder oil palm/food crop intercropping demo block, Sangara and Biru in Oro Province (AIGS funded) 1-79 Trial 520: Milne Bay Smallholder fertiliser/BMP demonstration blocks 1-88 Trial 256: New Ireland Smallholder fertiliser/BMP demonstration blocks 1-89 Trial 257: New Ireland Oil palm smallholder food security demonstration blocks 1-93 Trial 150: Smallholder fertiliser application/BMP demonstration blocks (WNBP) 1-94 Trial 151: Smallholder oil palm/food crop intercropping demo block, Buvusi, Hoskins Project 1-105 Project report: ‘Sustainable Management of soil and Water resources under Oil palm in Papua New Guinea’ ACIAR 2009-2013 1-111 Field Monitoring and experiment 1-111 a 2012 Annual Research Report PNG Oil Palm Research Association INC Cross objectives activities: “allometrics” 1-112 Cross objective activities : “scan” experiment 1-112 Cross objective activities : ‘replant’ experiment 1-113 Cross objective experiment activities: ‘FOPEC’ experiment 1-113 Objective 1: To determine by indicator soil health 1-114 Objective 2: To develop indicators of nutrient balances 1-114 Objective 3: To develop indicators of carbon sequestration 1-117 Objective 4: To develop indicators of aquatic ecosystem health 1-117 Potential anthropogenic chemical inputs 1-122 Objective 5: to develop a crop system model 1-124 Objective 6: Implementation 1-128 Assessing nitrogen fixation by Calopogonium caeruleum, Pueraria phaseoloides and Mucuna pruriens using the xylem ureide technique under oil palm in West New Britain Province, Papua New Guinea 1-130 COLLABORATION ON THE USE OF PLANT GROWTH REGULATORS 1-134 Introduction 1-134 Summary 1-135 2. ENTOMOLOGY SECTION 2-1 Summary 2-1 General operational work 2-1 Projects 2-1 Operational Research 2-2 Introduction 2-2 General issues 2-2 Oil palm pest reports 2-4 Pest Infestation Reports in 2012 2-7 Pest Damage Levels, Management Recommendations and Targeted Trunk Injection (TTI) in 2012 2-10 Other pest reports 2-15 Lepidoptera 2-15 Hemiptera 2-16 Coleoptera (rhinoceros beetles, weevils, white grubs) 2-16 Rodents and other Vertebrates 2-18 Weeds 2-18 Data base of the fauna on oil palm 2-19 Endnote reference database (reprints and abstracts) 2-19 Pest infestation database (PID) 2-19 Methamidophos usage database (MUD) 2-19 Seed production unit (SPU) pest monitoring traps 2-19 Applied research 2-20 Evaluation of alternative insecticides to methamidophos (Monitor®) for the control of sexavae and stick insects (ME, RD, EK) 2-20 Pheromone trapping of Oryctes rhinoceros L. (Rhinoceros beetle) in New Ireland Province (ME, EK, RD) 2-22 Psychidae (Bagworm) monitoring in Northern (Oro) Province (ME, SN) 2-26 Sexavae (S. decoratus and S. defoliaria): Fecundity, Survival and Embryonic Development 2-29 Regular OPIC Sexavae Egg Sampling and Dissection Programmes for Monitoring: Siki and Buvussi Divisions of the Hoskins Project, WNB 2-34 Biological Control Agents Rearing and Releases 2-35 Field Monitoring of Pollinating Weevil (Elaeidobius kamerunicus) 2-38 Arthropod Survey Program for Stream Health Monitoring (Smallholder Agricultural Development Project- SADP Project 2-40 Publications 2-46 b 2012 Annual Research Report Content Training, Field days and radio broadcasts 2-47 Student training 2-48 IPM working group meeting with hargy oil palms 2-49 International conferencesS 2-49 Donor funded project reports 2-49 Visitors to entomology section (Dami Head office) in 2012 2-50 Reference cited 2-51 3. PLANT PATHOLOGY SECTION 3-1 Epidemiology and control of Basal stem rot 3-1 Introduction 3-1 Monitoring the effects of disease on production in selected blocks 3-8 Yield studies on ganoderma-infected palms 3-9 Biological control of Ganoderma with Trichoderma spp. 3-9 Screening for Ganoderma resistance sucesptibility 3-9 Bogia coconut syndrome 3-11 Testing of coconut and insect samples 3-11 BCS vector study- ACIAR funded 3-11 Publication, conferences and travel 3-11 Travel 3-11 OTHER ACTIVITIES 3-12 Project administration 3-12 Disease reports 3-12 Training 3-12 Acknowledgements 3-13 4. SOCIO-ECONOMICS SECTION 4-1 Introduction 4-1 Commercial sector/smallholder partnerships for improving incomes in the oil palm and cocoa industries in Papua New Guinea. ACIAR Project ASEM/2006/127 (in collaboration with Curtin University) 4-1 SADP Smallholder Engagement Strategy (in collaboration with Curtin University) 4-2 Mobile Card Awareness 4-9 Improving food security and marketing opportunities for women in smallholder cash crop production. Agricultural Innovative Grant Scheme (AIGS Project #9120) 4-10 Smallholder production database. 4-11 Bialla plantation worker study 4-11 Collaboration with OPIC 4-12 Mainstreaming of Cross Cutting Issues: HIV & AIDS into PNGOPRA Programmes 4- 12 Community Activities 4-13 World Food Day 4-13 References 4-14 5. ROUND TABLE FOR SUSTAINABLE OIL PALM RSPO 5-1 c 2012 Annual Research Report PNG Oil Palm Research Association INC LIST OF TABLES Table 1. FFB production (MT) 2012 and comparison with 2011 production ............................................I Table 2. Planted Area of Oil palmin Production (ha) – December 2012 ...................................................I Table 3. PNGOPRA Members Voting Rights in 2013. ........................................................................... II Table 4. HargyOil Palms Ltd: Synopsis of 2012 PNGOPRA trial results and recommendations. ........ 1-5 Table 5. Apparent adequate tissue nutrient levels: ................................................................................ 1-5 Table 6. Trial 205 background information. .......................................................................................... 1-6 Table 7. Fertilizer and EFB treatments applied in Trial 205 in 2012 .................................................... 1-7 Table 8. Treatment effects (main) on yield and its parameters in 2012 and 2010-2012. ....................... 1-9 Table 9. Tissue nutrient concentration for Trial 205 in 2012 .............................................................. 1-10 Table 10. Effect (p values) of treatments on vegetative growth parameters in 2012. .......................... 1-11 Table 11. Effect of AN and TSP on number of green fronds .............................................................. 1-11 Table 12. Trial 211 background information. ...................................................................................... 1-13 Table 13. Nitrogen treatments and rates .............................................................................................. 1-14 Table 14. Main effects of treatments on FFB yield (t/ha), Bunch number (b/palm and b/ha) and SBW (kg/bunch) by N rate for 2012 and 2010-2012. ................................................................................... 1-15 Table 15. Effects (p values) of treatments on frond 17 nutrient concentrations in 2012. .................... 1-16 Table 16 Leaflet N (% dm) over time................................................................................................... 1-16 Table 17. Main effects of N treatments on vegetative growth parameters in 2012. ............................ 1-17 Table 18. Trial 212 background information. ...................................................................................... 1-18 Table 19. Nitrogen treatments and rates. ............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Field Host Range, Foraging Depth, and Impact Of
    FIELD HOST RANGE, FORAGING DEPTH, AND IMPACT OF CRICOTOPUS LEBETIS SUBLETTE (DIPTERA: CHIRONOMIDAE), A BIOLOGICAL CONTROL AGENT OF HYDRILLA VERTICILLATA (L.F.) ROYLE (HYDROCHARITACEAE) By EUTYCHUS MUKURE KARIUKI A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2017 © 2017 Eutychus Mukure Kariuki To my loving family ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I would like to thank my Major Advisor, Dr. Raymond L. Hix, and my Co-Advisor, Dr. James P. Cuda, for their support and guidance during my Ph.D. program. I am also thankful to my committee members, Dr. Stephen D. Hight for his invaluable support and mentorship during the course of my research; Dr. Jennifer Gillett-Kaufman for her constant support, especially through the writing process of my dissertation; and Dr. Lyn Gettys for always being available to help with questions. I am grateful to all others who provided their assistance, including Dr. Edzard van Santen (University of Florida), Dr. Lazarus Mramba (University of Florida), Dr. Emma Weeks (University of Florida), John Mass (United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), Tallahassee, Florida), Kelle Sullivan (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission), Dr. Lamberth Kanga (Florida A&M University), and Dr. Muhammad Haseeb (Florida A&M University). I am thankful to all my colleagues and lab mates at the University of Florida who reviewed this manuscript and offered valuable comments and suggestions. I am equally thankful to the USDA for providing funding to this study through the Hydrilla Integrated Pest Management Risk Avoidance and Mitigation Project (IPM RAMP) grant 2010-02825 and the National Institute of Food and Agriculture Crop Protection and Pest Management (NIFA CPPM) grant 2014-70006-22517.
    [Show full text]
  • (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for the Control of Salvinia
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2011 Introduction and Establishment of Cyrtobagous salviniae Calder and Sands (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for the Control of Salvinia minima Baker (Salviniaceae), and Interspecies Interactions Possibly Limiting Successful Control in Louisiana Katherine A. Parys Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Parys, Katherine A., "Introduction and Establishment of Cyrtobagous salviniae Calder and Sands (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) for the Control of Salvinia minima Baker (Salviniaceae), and Interspecies Interactions Possibly Limiting Successful Control in Louisiana" (2011). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 1565. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/1565 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. INTRODUCTION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF CYRTOBAGOUS SALVINIAE CALDER AND SANDS (COLEOPTERA: CURCULIONIDAE) FOR THE CONTROL OF SALVINIA MINIMA BAKER (SALVINIACEAE), AND INTERSPECIES INTERACTIONS POSSIBLY LIMITING SUCCESSFUL CONTROL IN LOUISIANA. A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Department of Entomology By Katherine A. Parys B.A., University of Rhode Island, 2002 M.S., Clarion University of Pennsylvania, 2004 December 2011 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS In pursing this Ph.D. I owe many thanks to many people who have supported me throughout this endeavor.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Control of Water Hyacinth with Arthropods: a Review to 2000
    Biological Control of Water Hyacinth with Arthropods: a Review to 2000 M.H. Julien* Abstract Water hyacinth, native to the Amazon River, invaded the tropical world over the last century and has become an extremely serious weed. The search for biological control agents began in the early 1960s and continues today. Six arthropod species have been released around the world. They are: two weevils, Neochetina bruchi and N. eichhorniae; two moths, Niphograpta albiguttalis and Xubida infusellus; a mite Orthogalumna terebrantis; and a bug Eccritotarsus catarinensis. The mite and X. infusellus have not contributed to control and the bug is under evaluation following recent releases in Africa. The two weevils and the moth N. albiguttalis have been released in numerous infestations since the 1970s and have contributed to successful control of the weed in many locations. It is timely to assess their impact on water hyacinth and, to help in planning future strategies, to identify the factors that contribute to or mitigate against successful biological control. Although the search for new agents continues, and as a result biological control will likely be improved, this technique alone is unlikely to be successful in all of the weed’s habitats. It is important that whole-of-catchment management strategies be developed that integrate biological control with other control techniques. The aims of such strategies should be to achieve the best possible control using methods that are affordable and sustainable; hence the need to develop strategies using biological control as the base component. WATER hyacinth apparently became a problem in the sation of the weed for commercial and subsistence USA following its distribution to participants in the purposes has also been widely considered.
    [Show full text]
  • Chevroned Water Hyacinth Weevil Neochetina Bruchi Hustache (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae)1 Eutychus Kariuki and Carey Minteer2
    EENY-741 Chevroned Water Hyacinth Weevil Neochetina bruchi Hustache (Insecta: Coleoptera: Curculionidae)1 Eutychus Kariuki and Carey Minteer2 The Featured Creatures collection provides in-depth profiles albiguttalis; and a planthopper, Megamelus scutellaris, of insects, nematodes, arachnids, and other organisms which were introduced into the United States in 1972, 1977, relevant to Florida. These profiles are intended for the use of and 2010, respectively (Tipping et al. 2014, Cuda and Frank interested laypersons with some knowledge of biology as well 2019). as academic audiences. Although larvae and pupae of chevroned water hyacinth Introduction weevil and mottled water hyacinth weevil are similar in appearance and behavior and can be difficult to differentiate Neochetina bruchi Hustache is commonly referred to as the by casual observation (Deloach and Cordo 1976), adult chevroned water hyacinth weevil and is a weed biological stages of the two species of water hyacinth weevils can be control agent used to manage water hyacinth, Pontederia distinguished relatively easily based on the color patterns crassipes Mart. [formerly Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms on their elytra (hardened forewings) (see below). (Pellegrini et al. 2018)], in more than 30 countries (Winston et al. 2014). Imported from Argentina, the insect was first introduced into the United States in Florida in 1974 and Description later released in Louisiana in 1974 (Manning 1979), Texas Adults in 1980, and California from 1982 to 1983 (Winston et al. The adults of chevroned water hyacinth weevil are 3.5 to 2014). Chevroned water hyacinth weevils currently occur 4.5 mm (males) and 4.1 to 5.0 mm (females) in length throughout the Gulf Coast States (Winston et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Monographs on Invasive Plants in Europe N°2:Eichhornia Crassipes
    BOTANY LETTERS, 2017 VOL. 164, NO. 4, 303–326 https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2017.1381041 MONOGRAPHS ON INVASIVE PLANTS IN EUROPE N° 2 Monographs on invasive plants in Europe N° 2: Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms Julie A. Coetzeea, Martin P. Hillb, Trinidad Ruiz-Téllezc , Uwe Starfingerd and Sarah Brunele aBotany Department, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa; bDepartment of Zoology and Entomology, Rhodes University, Grahamstown, South Africa; cGrupo de Investigación en Biología de la Conservación, Universidad de Extremadura, Badajoz, Spain; dJulius Kühn-Institut,Institute for National and International Plant Health, Braunschweig, Germany; eEuropean and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organization, Paris, France ABSTRACT ARTICLE HISTORY Eichhornia crassipes is notorious as the world’s worst aquatic weed, and here we present Received 10 July 2017 all aspects of its biology, ecology and invasion behaviour within the framework of the new Accepted 14 September 2017 series of Botany Letters on Monographs on invasive plants in Europe. Native to the Amazon in KEYWORDS South America, the plant has been spread around the world since the late 1800s through the water hyacinth; invasion; ornamental plant trade due to its attractive lilac flowers, and is established on every continent management; legislation except Antarctica. Its distribution is limited in Europe to the warmer southern regions by cold winter temperatures, but it has extensive ecological and socio-economic impacts where it invades. Its reproductive behaviour, characterised by rapid vegetative spread and high seed production, as well as its wide physiological tolerance, allows it to proliferate rapidly and persist in a wide range of environments. It has recently been regulated by the EU, under Regulation No.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Interactions in a Biological Control Context Using Water Hyacinth
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by South East Academic Libraries System (SEALS) “Is more, less?” Insect – insect interactions in a biological control context using water hyacinth as a model A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE of Rhodes University By Philip Sebastian Richard Weyl December 2011 Abstract Interactions between insects have been shown to be important regulators of population abundances and dynamics as well as drivers of spatial segregation and distribution. These are important aspects of the ecology of insects used in biological control and may have implications for the overall success of a particular programme. In the history of biological control there has been a tendency to release a suite of agents against a weed, which in some cases has increased the level of success, while in others little change has been observed. In most of these cases the implications of increasing the level of complexity of the system is not taken into account and there is little research on the effect of releasing another agent into the system. A brief meta-analysis was done on all the biological control programmes initiated in South Africa. Emphasis was placed on multi-species releases and the effects that overlapping niches were having on the number of agents responsible for the success of a programme. Where overlapping niches were present among agents released the number of agents responsible for success was lower than the number established. Water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes (Martius) Solms-Laubach in South Africa has more arthropod agents released against it than anywhere else in the world, yet control has been variable.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Intra- and Interspecific Interactions Between Two Biological Control
    Vincent M. Spadone Biological control of water hyacinth Spring 2017 Intra- and interspecific interactions between two biological control agents and the consequences on the invasive water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes Vincent M. Spadone ABSTRACT There is potential for negative, additive, or synergistic consequences on invasive pest control when multiple biological control agents are released in the same habitat. Here, I examine the intra- and interspecific interactions among the weevil, Neochetina bruchi, and the plant hopper, Megamelus scutellaris, and the implications for the biological control of water hyacinth, Eichhornia crassipes, in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Delta, California. With a factorial design of intra- and interspecific species interactions, I used experimental mesocosms with whole plants in a temperature-controlled incubator and measured plant growth, survival and insect reproduction and survival. I also conducted observational experiments and examined behavioral interactions among the intra – and interspecific treatments on both plant petioles and on excised leaves, each in dark and light phases. In the whole plant experiments, leaf mortality and overall plant survivorship differed among the treatments. The treatments with interspecific interactions had the highest loss of leaves and plant death. I found notable consequences on life- history parameters, as M. scutellaris produced more offspring, but had reduced survivorship in the interspecific treatments compared to the intraspecific treatments. Under laboratory conditions, it appears that although M. scutellaris does not negatively impact N. bruchi, there is potential that N. bruchi may have negative consequences on the survivorship of M. scutellaris. The results demonstrate that although presence of N. bruchi could potentially affect the population growth of M.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Pairs for the Biological Control of Weeds: Advantageous Or Unnecessary?
    Species pairs for the biological control of weeds: advantageous or unnecessary? C.A.R. Jackson and J.H. Myers Summary Two or more species of insects in the same genera have been introduced in some weed biological control programs, either by accident or on purpose, to increase the climatic range distribution of the agents. If the species are ecological equivalents, the introduction of both species will be unnecessary and may be detrimental if competition reduces their overall impacts. If however the species vary in the type of attack or their distributions, the introduction of congeners can be advantageous. In this paper, we review the following cases of species pair releases in the biological control of weeds in North America: the beetles Chrysolina quadrigemina (Suffrian) and Chrysolina hyperici (Forster) for St. Johnswort (Hypericum perforatum L.); the gallflies Urophora affinis Frfld. and Urophora quadrifasciata (Meig.) for knapweed (Centaurea) species; the weevils Neochetina bruchi Hustache and Neochetina eichhorniae Warner for water hyacinth [Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms] and the beetles Galerucella pusilla Duftschmidt and Galerucella calmariensis L. for purple loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria L.). In the cases of Chrysolina and Galerucella, the species pairs appear to be complementary for control of the target weeds, with each species providing good control in slightly different habitats and coexisting at some sites. With the Urophora gallflies, one species is more ef- fective than the other, but overall, seed reduction is greater when both agents are present in combi- nation (although this seed reduction is insufficient for a reduction of the target weed). In the case of the Neochetina beetles, a difference in the ability of the two species to kill plants was apparent, but whether they differed in habitat preferences was less clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Classical Biological Control of Weeds with Curculionidae
    CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources 2010 5, No. 028 Review Classical biological control of weeds with Curculionidae Nathan J. Herrick* and L. T. Kok* Address: Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 216 Price Hall (0319), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA *Correspondence: Nathan J. Herrick and L. T. Kok. Department of Entomology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 216 Price Hall (0319), Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA. Fax: 540.231.9131. Email: [email protected]; [email protected] Received: 13 November 2009 Accepted: 18 March 2010 doi: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20105028 The electronic version of this article is the definitive one. It is located here: http://www.cabi.org/cabreviews g CAB International 2010 (Online ISSN 1749-8848) Abstract The intentional use of insects to control weeds has been in practice for more than 150 years. Historically, species from the orders Lepidoptera and Coleoptera have shown the greatest success. Among the Coleoptera, the weevils (family Curculionidae) have played an integral role in the suppression of more than 50% of targeted weed programmes in various regions of the world. Notable successes using Curculionidae are in the control of waterhyacinth, Australian Acacia spp. and several thistle species. Published records indicate that of the 67 weed species targeted for control with Curculionidae worldwide, most are terrestrial-herbaceous weeds (65.7%). Curculionidae used for most of the targeted terrestrial-herbaceous (n=44) and aquatic/semi- aquatic weeds (n=6) are in North America, while the majority of the terrestrial-arborescent weeds (n=17) are in Africa. Of the 75 species of Curculionidae used to control these weeds worldwide, 34 are in North America.
    [Show full text]
  • Zootaxa, Annotated Checklist of Weevils from the Papuan Region
    ZOOTAXA 1536 Annotated checklist of weevils from the Papuan region (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) GREGORY P. SETLIFF Magnolia Press Auckland, New Zealand Zootaxa 1536 © 2007 Magnolia Press · 1 Gregory P. Setliff Annotated checklist of weevils from the Papuan region (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) (Zootaxa 1536) 296 pp.; 30 cm. 30 July 2007 ISBN 978-1-86977-139-3 (paperback) ISBN 978-1-86977-140-9 (Online edition) FIRST PUBLISHED IN 2007 BY Magnolia Press P.O. Box 41-383 Auckland 1346 New Zealand e-mail: [email protected] http://www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ © 2007 Magnolia Press All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored, transmitted or disseminated, in any form, or by any means, without prior written permission from the publisher, to whom all requests to reproduce copyright material should be directed in writing. This authorization does not extend to any other kind of copying, by any means, in any form, and for any purpose other than private research use. ISSN 1175-5326 (Print edition) ISSN 1175-5334 (Online edition) 2 · Zootaxa 1536 © 2007 Magnolia Press SETLIFF Zootaxa 1536: 1–296 (2007) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2007 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Annotated checklist of weevils from the Papuan region (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea) GREGORY P. SETLIFF Department of Entomology, University of Minnesota, 219 Hodson, 1980 Folwell Avenue, St. Paul, Minnesota 55108 U.S.A. & The New Guinea Binatang Research Center, P. O. Box 604, Madang, Papua New Guinea.
    [Show full text]
  • Water Hyacinth in the Rift Valley of Ethiopia
    Management of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms) using bioagents in the Rift Valley of Ethiopia Firehun Yirefu Gebregiorgis Thesis committee Promotor Prof. Dr P.C. Struik Professor of Crop Physiology Wageningen University & Research Co-promotors Dr E.A. Lantinga Associate professor, Farming Systems Ecology Group Wageningen University & Research Dr Taye Tessema Lecturer Plant Sciences Ambo University, Ethiopia Other members Prof. Dr D. Kleijn, Wageningen University & Research Prof. Dr J.J.A. van Loon, Wageningen University & Research Dr G.E. van Halsema, Wageningen University & Research Dr C. Kempenaar, Wageningen University & Research This research was conducted under the auspices of the C.T. de Wit Graduate School for Production Ecology and Resource Conservation Management of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms) using bioagents in the Rift Valley of Ethiopia Firehun Yirefu Gebregiorgis Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of doctor at Wageningen University by the authority of the Rector Magnificus, Prof. Dr A.P.J. Mol, in the presence of the Thesis Committee appointed by the Academic Board to be defended in public on Friday 31 March 2017 at 1.30 p.m. in the Aula. Firehun Yirefu Gebregiorgis Management of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms) using bioagents in the Rift Valley of Ethiopia, 174 pages. PhD thesis, Wageningen University, Wageningen, the Netherlands (2017) With references, with summary in English ISBN 978-94-6343-056-2 DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.18174/401611 Abstract Firehun Yirefu Gebregiorgis (2017). Management of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes [Mart.] Solms) using bioagents in the Rift Valley of Ethiopia. PhD Thesis, Wageningen University, The Netherlands.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects and Other Arthropods That Feed on Aquatic and Wetland Plants
    Insects and Other United States Arthropods That Feed on Department of Agriculture Aquatic and Wetland Agricultural Research Plants Service Technical Bulletin 1870 October 2002 Cover: Adult salvinia weevils on Salvinia minima United States Department of Agriculture Insects and Other Agricultural Research Arthropods That Feed on Service Technical Aquatic and Wetland Bulletin 1870 Plants Ted D. Center, F. Allen Dray, Jr., Greg P. Jubinsky, and Michael J. Grodowitz Center is research entomologist and Dray is ecologist, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. Jubinsky is environmental administrator, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Tallahassee. Grodowitz is research entomologist, U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Mississippi. Abstract Center, T.D., F.A. Dray Jr., G.P. Jubinsky, and M.J. Grodowitz. 1999. Insects and Other Arthropods That Feed on Aquatic and Wetland Plants. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Technical Bulletin No. 1870. Plant-feeding insects play an often unappreciated but important role in the dynamics of aquatic and wetland ecosystems. Natural resource managers, scientists, and others working in such ecosystems need to be able to recognize these insects and the damage they cause. This manual provides photographs and descriptions of the life stages and feeding damage of about 50 of the most common native plant-feeding insects and naturalized biological control insects found in aquatic and wetland ecosystems in the United States. Keywords: Biological control, herbivory, insect-plant interaction, insects, phytophagous, weeds. While supplies last, single copies of this publication can be obtained at no cost from USDA–ARS, Invasive Plant Research Laboratory, 3205 College Ave., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33314.
    [Show full text]