DOCSLIB.ORG

Citizen Lake-Monitoring Program (CLMP+): Advanced Volunteer Lake Monitoring in Wadena and Hubbard Counties

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Citizen Lake-Monitoring Program (CLMP+): Advanced Volunteer Lake Monitoring in Wadena and Hubbard Counties Citizen Lake-Monitoring Program (CLMP+): Advanced Volunteer Lake Monitoring in Wadena and Hubbard Counties r e iv R ll e h S UPPER TWIN LAKE ¤£71 HUBBARD DUCK LAKE WADENA LOWER TWIN LAKE er Shell Riv BLUEBERRY LAKE MORGAN LAKE B lu eb e rry River STOCKING LAKE MN-87 SPIRIT LAKE JIM COOK LAKE Menahga January 2006 Citizen Lake-Monitoring Program (CLMP+): Advanced Volunteer Lake Monitoring in Wadena and Hubbard Counties Blueberry Lake (80-0034) Duck Lake (29-0142) Jim-Cook Lake (80-0027) Morgan Lake (80-0038) Upper Twin Lake (29-0157) Lower Twin Lake (80-0030) Spirit Lake (80-0039) Stocking Lake (80-0037) Environmental Analysis and Outcomes Division Water Assessment and Environmental Information Section Pam Anderson Jennifer L.K. Klang January 2006 Printed on recycled paper containing at least 10 percent fibers from paper recycled by consumers. This material may be made available in other formats, including Braille, large format and audiotape. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tables ....................................................................................................................................................1 List of Figures....................................................................................................................................................2 Part 1. Program History & Background Information on Minnesota Lakes .....................................................4 Part 2. 2005 Lake Surveys................................................................................................................................7 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................7 Data Analysis................................................................................................................................................8 ★ Blueberry Lake....................................................................................................................................13 ★ Duck Lake ...........................................................................................................................................17 ★ Jim-Cook Lake ....................................................................................................................................20 ★ Morgan Lake .......................................................................................................................................21 ★ Upper Twin Lake ................................................................................................................................25 ★ Lower Twin Lake................................................................................................................................29 ★ Spirit Lake...........................................................................................................................................33 ★ Stocking Lake......................................................................................................................................37 Part 3. Water Quality Trends............................................................................................................................40 Part 4. Water Quality Modeling........................................................................................................................47 Part 5. Goal Setting...........................................................................................................................................51 Part 6. Summary & Recommendations.............................................................................................................52 Appendix ...........................................................................................................................................................55 Glossary.............................................................................................................................................................69 References .........................................................................................................................................................71 LIST OF TABLES Page 1. Summer-Mean Water Quality Parameters for Wadena County CLMP+ Lakes ......................................... 10 2. Lake Morphometry, Watershed Areas & Trophic State Indicators for Wadena County CLMP+ Lakes.... 11 3. MINLEAP Results and Predictions for Wadena County CLMP+ Lakes.................................................... 47 4. MINLEAP Default Values and Values Calibrated for Modeling ............................................................... 48 4. Nutrient and Trophic Status Thresholds for Determination of Use Support for Lakes............................... 52 1 LIST OF FIGURES Page 1. Diagrams of Lake Layers and Mixing ............................................................................................................ 5 2. Minnesota Ecoregions & Counties ................................................................................................................. 6 3. Carlson’s Trophic State Index....................................................................................................................... 12 4. Blueberry Lake Bathymetric Map and Monitoring Locations ...................................................................... 13 5. Blueberry Lake Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Profile Data for 2005 ................................................ 14 6. Blueberry Lake Total Phosphorus Results for 2005 ..................................................................................... 15 7. Blueberry Lake Chlorophyll-a Results for 2005........................................................................................... 15 8. Blueberry Lake Algal Populations for 2005 ................................................................................................. 16 9. Blueberry Lake Secchi Transparency for 2005............................................................................................. 17 10. Duck Lake Bathymetric Map and Monitoring Locations ............................................................................. 17 11. Duck Lake Temperature Profile Data for 2005............................................................................................. 18 12. Duck Lake Total Phosphorus Results for 2005............................................................................................. 18 13. Duck Lake Chlorophyll-a Results for 2005.................................................................................................. 19 14. Duck Lake Algal Populations for 2005......................................................................................................... 19 15. Duck Lake Secchi Transparency for 2005.................................................................................................... 20 16. Jim-Cook Lake Bathymetric Map and Monitoring Locations ...................................................................... 21 17. Morgan Lake Bathymetric Map and Monitoring Locations ......................................................................... 21 18. Morgan Lake Temperature and Dissolved Oxygen Profile Data for 2005.................................................... 22 19. Morgan Lake Total Phosphorus Results for 2005......................................................................................... 23 20. Morgan Lake Chlorophyll-a Results for 2005 .............................................................................................. 23 21. Morgan Lake Algal Populations for 2005..................................................................................................... 24 22. Morgan Lake Secchi Transparency for 2005................................................................................................ 24 23. Upper Twin Lake Bathymetric Map and Monitoring Locations................................................................... 25 24. Upper Twin Lake Temperature Profile Data for 2005.................................................................................. 26 25. Upper Twin Lake Total Phosphorus Results for 2005.................................................................................. 27 26. Upper Twin Lake Chlorophyll-a Results for 2005 ....................................................................................... 27 27. Upper Twin Lake Algal Populations for 2005.............................................................................................. 28 28. Upper Twin Lake Secchi Transparency for 2005 ......................................................................................... 29 29. Lower Twin Lake Bathymetric Map and Monitoring Locations .................................................................. 30 30. Lower Twin Lake Temperature Profile Data for 2005 ................................................................................. 30 31. Lower Twin Lake Total Phosphorus Results for 2005 ................................................................................. 31 32. Lower Twin Lake Chlorophyll-a Results for 2005....................................................................................... 31 33. Lower Twin Lake Algal Populations for 2005 ............................................................................................. 32 34. Lower Twin Lake Secchi Transparency for 2005........................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Geologic Atlas of Wadena County, Minnesota
    Prepared and Published with the Support of COUNTY ATLAS SERIES ATLAS C-40, PART A MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THE WADENA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, AND Wadena County Harvey Thorleifson, Director the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative-CitiZen Commission on Minnesota Resources, Plate 2—Bedrock Geology AND the Minnesota Legacy Amendment'S Clean Water Fund 95° 7' 30" 95° 94° 52' 30" R. 33 W. HUBBARD COUNTY R. 35 W. R. 34 W. HUBBARD COUNTY A Ku 420 435 420 Blueberry 420 Lower 6 1 420 420 River 6 420 1 435 Twin 6 ]71 Amv Lake 1 Blueberry 420 Acg Shell River 420 River Aif 420 Acg BEDROCK GEOLOGY 420 WAD-3 CASS COUNTY Lake 420 435Kettle Acd 420 87 420 ) Stocking Wing By River Lake BLUEBERRY SHELL RIVER 420 Amy L. Radakovich and V.W. Chandler T. 138 N. T. 138 N. Finn Acg Menahga 420 HUNTERSVILLE Jim Cook 420 Lake Crow � Aif Lake 420 46° 45' 46° 45' dn Spirit LOCATION DIAGRAM Lake 2016 )87 420 420 450 435 420 420 Acv Acg Burgen �as Lake 31 36 Acd Creek 36 31 31 36 CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS BECKER COUNTY 435 450 Acv 420 1 6 1 6 420 1 6 INTRUSIVE ROCKS SUPRACRUSTAL ROCKS 435 Yaeger Lake p 420 m Ku Cretaceous MESOZOIC a 420 w Mud S unconformity Cat Lake River Foreland basin, ANIMIKIE GROUP as 450 420 Penokean orogen Kenora-Kabetogama dike swarm PALEO- OTTER TAIL COUNTY TAIL OTTER ]71 Intrusions of PROTEROZOIC Rice Aci 435 Lake uncertain age dn dr 420 ig 420 B Kitten 435 420 Am Ag WAWA SUBPROVINCE Creek 420 ORTON 435 Creek RED EYE MEADOW T.
    [Show full text]
  • Crow Wing River Watershed TMDL (Wq-Iw8-45E)
    Crow Wing River Watershed TMDL Quantification of the pollutant reductions needed to improve lake and stream water quality impairments due to excess phosphorus, excess bacteria, or high water temperature. August 2014 wq-iw8-45e Authors and contributors: Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc: Meghan Jacobson, PhD Pat Conrad Camilla Correll Luke Nolby Sean Marczewski Etoile Jensen Annie Weeks Bonnie Finnerty, MPCA Kevin Stroom, MPCA Mark Evenson, MPCA John Erdmann, PhD, PE, MPCA Doug Kingsley and Mike Kelly, Park Rapids MN DNR-Fisheries Darrin Hoverson, Park Rapids MN DNR-Ecological and Water Resources (Area Hydrologist) Anne Oldakowski, Wadena SWCD Melissa Barrick, Crow Wing SWCD Julie Kingsley and Melissa Koebernick, Hubbard SWCD Sibley Lake Assocation Mayo Lake Association Blueberry Lake Association Twin Lakes Association Crow Wing River Watershed TMDL • August 2014 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iv List of Acronyms .......................................................................................................................... vii TMDL SUMMARY TABLE ......................................................................................................... ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eagle Lake 29-0256-00 HUBBARD COUNTY
    Eagle Lake 29-0256-00 HUBBARD COUNTY Lake Water Quality Summary Eagle Lake is located about nine miles north of Park Rapids, Minnesota. It covers 411 acres and has a long, narrow shape. Eagle Lake has one inlet and one outlet, which classifies it as a drainage lake. The inlet enters on the north side of the lake from Island Lake. The outlet flows out of the south end into Potato Lake. From Potato Lake, the Potato River joins the Fish Hook River, which eventually joins the Shell River and then the Crow Wing River. Water quality data have been collected on Eagle Lake since 1991 (Table 3). These data show that the lake is mesotrophic, which is characterized by moderately clear water throughout the summer and excellent recreational opportunities. The Eagle Lake Association is involved in many activities, including water quality monitoring. They are also a member of the Hubbard Coalition of Lake Associations (COLA). Table 1. Eagle Lake location and key physical characteristics. Location Data Physical Characteristics MN Lake ID: 29-0256-00 Surface area (acres): 411 County: Hubbard Littoral area (acres): 164 Ecoregion: Northern Lakes & Forests % Littoral area: 40% Major Drainage Basin: Upper Mississippi River Max depth (ft), (m): 77, 23.5 Latitude/Longitude: 47.03000000 / -95.09972222 Inlets: 1 Invasive Species: None Outlets: 1 Public Accesses: 1 Table 2: Availability of data and an observation of the quantity of sample points. Data Availability Excellent data set through the Citizens Lake Transparency data Monitoring Program. Excellent data set through the RMB Lab Lakes Chemical data Program. Inlet/Outlet data No inlet or outlet data exist for this lake.
    [Show full text]
  • Huntersville State Forest Guide And
    3 3 460 470 480 490 500 510 520 530 540 550 560Palmer 570 580 590 600 610 620 630 640 HUNTERSVILLE STATE FOREST )"13 Crow Wing )"11 " Chain WMA Upper m 860 RoadsTwin and" 6Trails 860 Lake ) )"15 County Road Frandsen HUNTERVILLE STATE FOREST Slough Duck Lake 1057 Township Road HUBBARD COUNTY 33,964 ACRES • ESTABLISHED 1963 )"21 [" Forest Road WADENA COUNTY Minimum Maintenance FOREST LANDSCAPE: This forest lies 0234 HUBBARD COUNTY 850 Forest)" 23Road Shell City Round 153 850 0234 )" )"110 entirely within the coniferous forest biome. Off-Highway Motorcycle Campground Lake Topography contains a mix of glacial features !" ¹" õ" ï! 0235 such as hilly moraines and drumlins, and more Off-Highway Motorcycle 0341 level outwash and till plains. Historically, fires & ATV occurred every 10 to 40 years, and today jack Hunter Walking Trails )"25 Horse Trails 0358 0359 pine, quaking aspen, and paper birch dominate. 840 #" õ" ï! Tree Farm 840 [" 0240 0877 Landing CASS COUNTY Stands of red and white pine are also found in Public Facilities \" ¹" ! 0234 ï 580-836 the forest. 0359 0359 m" Parking WADENA COUNTY A WORKING FOREST: From year to year, Shell River 577-836 õ" Primitive Toilet 0348 you may see changes in this forest. The DNR 0382 ï! Drinking Water 0399 )"153 manages the trees, water, and wildlife in state 0386 830 830 " Campground forests for everyone to keep them healthy ! 0382 587-827 and meet recreational, environmental, and #" Horse Campground 0383 106 575-827 economic goals. Trees are harvested to make " Watercraft Campsite )" 0338 " r ¹ \ e v i a variety of products, such as lumber and HUNTERSVILLE 0384 \" Carry-In Access Cr R ow 595-822 building materials, pulp for making paper, 18 Wi n g " " " Trailer Access 0304 492-820 )" m õ pallets, fencing, and telephone poles.
    [Show full text]
  • Ghiver This Report Was Prepared By: L\1Anagelllent Lan the Wadena County Advisory Committee
    ral Resources " nai · February 1977 ~ 16~ .e,o5 This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp (Funding for document digitization was provided, in part, by a grant from the Minnesota Historical & Cultural Heritage Program.) gHiver This report was prepared by: l\1anagelllent lan The Wadena County advisory committee: Emil Burgau Crow Wing River Tim Frieday Jan Holden Greg Kempf Harold Kinnunen Joyce Line Russel Nanik Abner Roche Hubert Schermerhorn Tom Schulz Jack Stigman Doug Swanson David Tellock Frances Tellock Jeanne Tellock Roger Tellock Chuck Winkels Rivers Section, Division of Parks and Recreation: Arne Steff erud, rivers project coordinator James Weseloh, rivers project leader Dale Homuth, rivers project leader Kathy Brandl, student intern Jane Harper, researcher Greg Breining, rivers project coordinator Michael Priesnitz, rivers coordinator I I' This management plan, prepared by the Minnesota Summary Department of Natural Resources (DNR) and an advisory board of Wadena County residents, recommends that the stretch of the Crow Wing River in Wadena County be included in the Minnesota Wild, Scenic and Recreational Rivers System. The DNR and county residents revised the plan after public meetings on the proposal in April. The DNR feels that the Crow Wing River qualifies for "Wild" and "Scenic" classifications under the Wild and Scenic Rivers Act of 197 3. The act was passed by the legislature to "preserve and protect" rivers with "outstanding scenic-, recreational, natural, historical, scientific and similar values." This report is divided into three major sections: Analysis, Management Plan and Appendix.
    [Show full text]
  • Minnesota Rivers a Primer
    Minnesota Rivers a primer Mary E. Renwick Susanna Eden Water Resources Center University of Minnesota Public Report Series #13 November 1999 Minnesota Rivers: a primer by Mary E. Renwick Susanna Eden Water Resources Center University of Minnesota This is Public Report #13 of the Water Resources Center. The following people provided suggestions for additions and deletions, as well as reviewed drafts of this report: Patrick Brezonik, Jim Anderson, Tracy Thomas, Barbara Liukkonen and Marcey Westrick. We greatly appreciate all their input. The development of this publication was supported in part by funds provided by the U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, and the Water Resources Research Center, University of Minnesota, as authorized by the Water Resources Research and Development Act. Contents of this publication do not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior, nor does mention of trade names of commercial products constitute their endorsement by the U.S. Government. The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity employer and educator. Water Resources Center College of Natural Resources University of Minnesota St. Paul, MN 55108 ___________________________________________________________________________________Minnesota Rivers Contents Preface Chapter 1 River System Functions: A River Sciences Primer Introduction . .1 Basic Physical Components of the Stream Corridor: A Cross-Sectional View . .1 Stream Channel . .1 Moving Along the Stream Corridor: A Longitudinal View . .3 Structural Changes in the Stream Corridor from its Headwaters to Outlet . .3 Stream Order Models . .3 Longitudinal Changes in Stream Ecosystems . .4 Key Stream Processes and Other Important System Characteristics . .8 Hydrologic and Hydraulic Processes .
    [Show full text]
  • Crow Wing River Watershed Stressor Identification Report
    z c Crow Wing River Watershed Stressor Identification Report Determination of stress factors affecting aquatic biological communities April 2014 Author The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs Kevin Stroom (MPCA) by using the Internet to distribute reports and information to wider audience. Visit our web Contributors/acknowledgements site for more information. Dave Friedl (MDNR) - Geomorphological field MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- work and data analysis/conclusions. consumer recycled content paper manufactured without chlorine or chlorine Mike Kelly (MDNR) - Geomorphological field derivatives work, culvert assessments, and Straight River information. Chuck Johnson (MPCA) - Field observations and comments assisting stressor determination. Manuscript reviewers: Bonnie Finnerty (MPCA) Darrin Hoverson (MDNR) Mike Sharp (MPCA) Karsten Klimek (MPCA) Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Editing and graphic design Amendment). Cover photo: Kevin Stroom – Straight River Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us Document number: wq-ws5-07010106 Contents Executive summary ............................................................................................................................1 Introduction ......................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Watershed Classification 2
    CWC Water Plan ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IMPLEMENTATION: OTHER PRIORITY WATERSHEDS This analysis also revealed that there were 24 watersheds with the enhance / protection or protection classification that were unique in that they had a lot of attributes worthy of protection such as lakes and rivers (often with stable or improving water quality and/or wild rice), areas with biodiversity and ecological significance, bluffs or steep slopes, wetlands, and forested areas, but also had potential risk factors such as higher amounts of animal units, development/impervious, disturbed land cover classes, and extractive uses. Because of this unique status and the real threat that these watersheds could very easily change their risk classification in the future, these watersheds would be top overall priorities to focus water planning efforts on. Figure 30. Priority Watersheds (Enhance / Protection or Protection watersheds only) 55 CWC Water Plan ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IMPLEMENTATION: MAJOR WATERSHED SUMMARY Figure 31. Risk Classification & % Protected by Major Watershed (Crow Wing County only) 25 20 15 10 5 0 Crow Wing River Mississippi River ‐ Mississippi River ‐ Pine River Rum River Brainerd Sartell Public Ownership: Public Ownership: Public Ownership: Public Ownership: Public Ownership: 5% 15% 15% 30% 23% Protected: 44% Protected: 43% Protected:
    [Show full text]
  • I N T R Nit Rl 1 La
    iti I nt r nit rl 1 la · ~uu~~~~uu~ 1 Table of Contents Table of Contents page2 Introduction and Overview Title Page page4 Group Description pages Introduction Narrative page6 Monitoring Program Cycle & Flow Chart page 7 Watershed Background Information 1.1 Watershed Maps page9 1.2 Watershed and Surface Water Information page 11 1.3 Inventory of Uses page 12 ·1.4 Understanding State Standards That Define Your Waters Health page 13 Monitoring Goals and Data Use 2.1 Issues, Efforts to Address Those Issues, Evaluation, and Outcomes page 20 3 .1 Data Users and Data Uses page 23 4.1 Monitoring Assessment page 26 What, How, Where, When Will You.Monitor 5 .1 Parameters page 28 5 .2 Sample Collection Methods and Sampling Quality Objectives page 31 5.3 Analytical l\lthods page 34 5.4 Data Quality Objectives for Own Analysis page36 6.la Sampling Site List by site page 38 6.lb Sampling Site List by program page 48 6.2 Site Maps page 50 6.3 Sampling Schedule page 55 Quality Assurance and Quality Control 7 .1 Quality Control Measures page 58 7.2 Instrument and Equipment Requirements page 59 Data Storage & Management 8 .1 Field arid Labor<:itory Sheets , page 61 8.2 Data Transfer, Entry, and Validation page 62 8.3 Miscellaneous and Problem Data page 64 8.4 Meta-data page 65 Data Analysis, Interpretation, and Assessments 9 .1 Comparing Data to Benchmarks page 68 9 .2 Data Interpretation and Assessment page 74 Reporting, Presenting, and Planning for Change 10.1 Reporting, Presenting and Planning for Change page 77 (continued on following page) 2 Volunteer and Program Management 11.1 ·rask Identification and Timeline page 79 11.2 Volunteer Monitors Contact Information page 81 11.3 Committees and Data Users Contact Information page 83 Budget 11.4 Overall Budget page 86 Follow-up and Evaluation 12.1 Follow-up page 89 12.2 Evaluation page 90 Appendix page 92 A- 7050.0200 Water Use Classifications For Waters Of The State (Wadena County, MN) B- Desired Fish Temperature for Spawning and Feeding C- Sample Collection Methods and Sampling Quality Objectives .
    [Show full text]
  • SPOT DEIS (Hereinafter “Lubetkin Technical Review”), Table 19
    March 23, 2020 Submitted via electronic mail and www.regulations.gov/docket?D=MARAD-2019-0011 Ms. Yvette Fields Maritime Administration Office of Deepwater Ports and Offshore Activities 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, W21-310 (MAR-530) Washington, DC 20590 Telephone: 202-366-0926 E-Mail: [email protected] Mr. William Nabach Project Manager U.S. Coast Guard 2703 Martin Luther King Jr Ave SE, Washington, DC 20020 Telephone: 202-372-1437 Email: [email protected] Re: Comments on SPOT Terminal, LLC, National Environmental Policy Act Draft Environmental Impact Statement, Docket No. MARAD-2019-0011 Dear Ms. Fields and Mr. Nabach: The undersigned groups submit the following comments to the Maritime Administration (“MARAD”) and the U.S. Coast Guard (“USCG”) on the Draft Environmental Impact Statement (“Draft EIS” or “DEIS”) for SPOT Terminal Services LLC’s (“SPOT Terminal” or “SPOT”) deepwater port (“DWP”) license application for its Sea Port Oil Terminal DWP Project (“SPOT Project” or “Project”), Docket Id: MARAD-2019-0011.1 SPOT Terminal seeks authorization to construct and operate a massive deepwater port terminal that includes modification or construction of two onshore terminals, construction of over 140 miles of onshore and offshore pipelines, and the installation of two buoys about 30 nautical miles off the coast of Brazoria County, Texas, capable of loading two Very Large Crude Carriers (“VLCCs”) at a time. SPOT intends to transport and export up to 2 million barrels of crude oil per day—an unprecedented, massive quantity that is more than that produced in the entire Gulf of Mexico in a year.
    [Show full text]
  • Crow Wing River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report • January 2014 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency
    Crow Wing River Watershed Monitoring and Assessment Report January/2014 Authors Contributors / Acknowledgements Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs by Crow Wing River Watershed Report Team: using the Internet to distribute reports and Karsten Klimek, Scott Niemela, Kelly O’Hara, information to wider audience. Visit our website for Jim MacArthur, Bruce Monson, Kevin Stroom, more information. Bonnie Finnerty, Ben Lundeen, MPCA reports are printed on 100 percent post- Dave Christopherson, Andrew Streitz consumer recycled content paper manufactured and Shawn Nelson without chlorine or chlorine derivatives. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota Department of Agriculture Becker Soil and Water Conservation District Cass Environmental Services District Clearwater Soil and Water Conservation District Crow Wing County Planning and Zoning Crow Wing Soil and Water Conservation District Hubbard Soil and Water Conservation District Morrison Soil and Water Conservation District Otter Tail Soil and Water Conservation District Todd Soil and Water Conservation District Wadena Soil and Water Conservation District Citizen Stream Monitoring Program Volunteers Project dollars provided by the Clean Water Fund (from the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment). Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative
    [Show full text]
  • Designated Infested Waters
    Department of Natural Resources Designation of Infested Waters May 2, 2011 Pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes, including but not limited to section 84D.03, subdivision 1 the following described waters are designated infested waters. New infested waters were designated by a Commissioner’s Order INF-10-004 that was signed on December 15, 2010 and became effective on December 27, 2010. Commissioner’s Order INF-11-001, which makes technical changes to lake names and public waters numbers for previous designations, was signed on April 21, 2011 and became effective on May 2, 2011. The additions and modifications of previous designations are underlined and deleted text is shown with strikethrough. A lake in more than one county is listed under the county corresponding to its public waters inventory number, but the designation applies to the entire lake. Lake Superior and designated portions of rivers that flow through more than one county are listed under the heading Multiple Counties. Ponds and wetlands that are not on the public waters inventory are listed with “none” in the number column. Rivers and streams on the public waters inventory are listed without a number in the number column. Waters infested with Brazilian elodea. The following water bodies are infested with Brazilian elodea (Egeria densa). Name DNR Public Waters Inventory Number Hennepin County Powderhorn Lake 27-0014 Waters infested with brittle naiad. The following water bodies are infested with brittle naiad (Najas minor). Name DNR Public Waters Inventory Number Dakota County Lac Lavon 19-0446 Hennepin County Round Lake 27-0071 1 Waters infested with Eurasian water milfoil.
    [Show full text]