DOCSLIB.ORG

Notice of Availability of the Draft Crow Wing River Watershed Restoration

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Notice of Availability of the Draft Crow Wing River Watershed Restoration Crow Wing River Watershed Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy Report October 22, 2014 wq-ws4-09a Crow Wing River Watershed Report 1 Contributors: Meghan Jacobson and Pat Conrad (Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc.) Bonnie Finnerty (Minnesota Pollution Control Agency) Darrin Hoverson (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) Nate Sitz, Julie Kingsley, and Melissa Koebernick (Hubbard SWCD) Anne Oldakowski and Darren Newville (Wadena SWCD) Melissa Barrick (Crow Wing SWCD) Helen McLennan and Lance Chisholm (Morrison SWCD) John Ringle and Kelly Condiff (Cass County) Amy Warnberg and Tim Stieber (Todd County) Dan Steward and Jeff Hrubes (Board of Water and Soil Resources) Luke Stuewe (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) Todd Holman and Kristen Blann (The Nature Conservancy) The science and analysis described in this report began before the passage of the 2013 Clean Water Accountability Act. Thus, this report may not address all elements of the Clean Water Accountability Act. When this watershed is revisited (according to the 10-year cycle), the information in this report will be updated according to the required elements of a Watershed Restoration and Protection Strategy (WRAPS) Report. This document is only the WRAPs report. It summarizes and references, but does not contain, the Total Maximum Daily Load documents. Crow Wing River Watershed Report i Table of Contents Table of Contents .................................................................................................................. ii Key Terms ............................................................................................................................. v What is the WRAPS Report? .................................................................................................. 1 Users’ Guide .......................................................................................................................... 2 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................... 5 2. Watershed Conditions .................................................................................................... 5 2.1. Water Quality Assessment ............................................................................................................ 6 2.2. Water Quality Trends .................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.1. Lake Trends ........................................................................................................................... 8 2.2.2. Stream Trends ..................................................................................................................... 11 2.3. Stressors and Sources .................................................................................................................. 12 2.3.1. Stressors of Biologically-Impaired Stream Reaches ............................................................ 12 2.3.2. Pollutant sources ................................................................................................................ 14 2.4. TMDL Summary ........................................................................................................................... 17 2.5. Protection Considerations ........................................................................................................... 18 2.5.1. Long-term Monitoring......................................................................................................... 18 2.5.2. Cold Water Fisheries ........................................................................................................... 18 2.5.3. High Value Sensitive Lakes .................................................................................................. 18 2.5.4. High Value Lakes near Water Quality Thresholds ............................................................... 18 2.5.5. Shoreline Development ...................................................................................................... 19 2.5.6. Wetland Protection ............................................................................................................. 19 2.5.7. Forest Conversion ............................................................................................................... 19 2.5.8. Agricultural Nutrient Management .................................................................................... 20 Crow Wing River Watershed Report ii 2.5.9. Road Culvert Placement ...................................................................................................... 20 2.5.10. Source-water Ground Water Protection ............................................................................. 20 2.5.11. Areas of Biodiversity ........................................................................................................... 21 2.5.12. Sensitive Shorelines ............................................................................................................ 22 3. Prioritizing and Implementing Restoration and Protection ............................................ 23 3.1. Civic Engagement ........................................................................................................................ 24 3.1.1. Steering Committee Meetings ............................................................................................ 24 3.1.2. Public Meetings ................................................................................................................... 25 3.1.3. Accomplishments and Future Plans .................................................................................... 25 3.2. Targeting of Geographic Areas ................................................................................................... 26 3.2.1. Watershed Ranking Tool ..................................................................................................... 26 3.2.2. Lake Ranking & Management Tool ..................................................................................... 26 3.2.3. Hydrological Simulation Program – FORTRAN (HSPF) Model ............................................. 26 3.2.4. Impaired Lake Phosphorus Load Reductions ...................................................................... 27 3.3. Restoration & Protection Strategies ........................................................................................... 31 3.3.1. (0701010601) STRAIGHT RIVER HUC 10 Watershed: Proposed strategies and actions ..... 42 3.3.2. (0701010602) FISHHOOK RIVER HUC 10 Watershed: Proposed strategies and actions .... 44 3.3.3. (0701010603) BLUEBERRY RIVER HUC 10 Watershed: Proposed strategies and actions .. 49 3.3.4. (0701010604) SHELL RIVER HUC 10 Watershed: Proposed strategies and actions ............ 51 3.3.5. (0701010605) BELLE TAINE LAKE HUC 10 Watershed: Proposed strategies and actions ... 55 3.3.6. (0701010606) HEADWATERS CROW WING RIVER HUC 10 Watershed: Proposed strategies and actions .......................................................................................................................................... 59 3.3.7. (0701010607) BIG SWAMP CREEK HUC 10 Watershed: Proposed strategies and actions . 64 3.3.8. (0701010608) CAT RIVER – CROW WING RIVER HUC 10 Watershed: Proposed strategies and actions .......................................................................................................................................... 65 Crow Wing River Watershed Report iii 3.3.9. (0701010609) PARTRIDGE RIVER HUC 10 Watershed: Proposed strategies and actions ... 69 3.3.10. (0701010610) GULL RIVER – CROW WING RIVER HUC 10 Watershed: Proposed strategies and actions .......................................................................................................................................... 71 3.3.11. (0701010611) CROW WING RIVER HUC 10 Watershed: Proposed strategies and actions 78 4. Monitoring Plan ............................................................................................................ 80 5. References and Further Information ............................................................................. 81 Appendix A: MPCA Water Quality Assessment Results ......................................................... 82 Appendix B: Stream and Lake TMDL Summaries .................................................................. 91 Appendix C: Watershed Ranking Tool ................................................................................ 104 Appendix D: Lake Ranking & Management Tool ................................................................. 115 Appendix E: HSPF Watershed Pollutant Yields .................................................................... 124 Appendix F: Index of Stream Name, AUID & HUC 12 .......................................................... 129 Appendix G: Index of Lake Name, ID & HUC 12 .................................................................. 144 Crow Wing River Watershed Report iv Key Terms Assessment Unit Identifier (AUID): The unique water body identifier for each river reach comprised of the USGS eight-digit HUC plus a three-character code unique within each HUC. Aquatic life impairment: The presence and vitality of aquatic life is indicative of the overall water quality of a stream. A stream is considered impaired for impacts to aquatic life if the fish Index of Biotic Integrity (IBI), macroinvertebrate IBI, dissolved oxygen, turbidity, or
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Minnesota River at Belle Plaine Low Point Staff Gauge Ucoop 735
    Report Date: 09/20/2021 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NWSLI CITY AZRAN ST COUNTY LAT (DMS) LON(DMS) LAT(DD) LON(DD) STNTYPE WFO DETAIL PROGRAM PROGRAM ID ELEV --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AADM5 ADA MN NORMAN 47 18 00N 096 31 00W 47.3000 -96.5167 WOS FGF UCOOP 906 ADAM5 ADA MN NORMAN 47 18 00N 096 31 00W 47.3000 -96.5167 WOS FGF COOPAB 21-0018 906 ADEM5 ADA 3E MN NORMAN 47 18 00N 096 26 00W 47.3000 -96.4333 WOS FGF UCOOP ADSM5 ADA 2S MN NORMAN 47 15 45N 096 30 03W 47.2625 -96.5008 WOS FGF WILD RICE RVR NR ADA GOES 5531C28E UCOOP AWNM5 ADA 1N MN NORMAN 47 19 16N 096 30 50W 47.3211 -96.5139 WOS FGF ADA NDAWN MESO-ST 78 910 ADOM5 ADOLPH 1N MN ST. LOUIS 46 47 56N 092 16 51W 46.7989 -92.2808 WOS DLH UCOOP ADRM5 ADRIAN MN NOBLES 43 37 57N 095 56 32W 43.6325 -95.9422 WOS FSD UCOOP 1650 AFTM5 AFTON 2NNW MN WASHINGTON 44 55 24N 092 47 31W 44.9234 -92.7920 WOS MPX AFTON 2 NNW UCOOP 840 AIT AITKIN MN AITKIN 46 32 54N 093 40 36W 46.5483 -93.6767 WOS DLH AWOS AITM5 AITKIN 2E MN AITKIN 46 31 33N 093 40 03W 46.5257 -93.6674 WOS DLH AITKIN 2E COOPAB 21-0059 1215 Report Date: 09/20/2021 --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- NWSLI CITY AZRAN ST COUNTY LAT (DMS) LON(DMS) LAT(DD) LON(DD) STNTYPE WFO DETAIL PROGRAM PROGRAM ID ELEV ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • A STATE WATER TRAIL GUIDE to the LONG PRAIRIE RIVER the LONG to TRAIL GUIDE WATER STATE a Creek 71 7 66 3
    A STATE WATER TRAIL GUIDE TO THE LONG PRAIRIE RIVER 1010 73 210210 210210 210210 7575 11 210210 2323 7777 C 21 r 210210 9 ow Motley CASS CO. 210210 Wing 2929 73 210210 10 7575 73 River Hewitt 7 5 O. Inman Route Description of the Long Prairie River 71 68 WMA Lawrence 28 WMA TODD C NOTE: (R) and (L) represent right and left banks of the river when facing downstream. 7676 7272 RIVER MILE 28 2323 Staples PRAIRIE 11 MORRISONMO CO 7777 9 WMA 93.7 Lake Carlos State Park and lake outlet. 47.3 Riverside Drive bridge. 73 7 47.2 2 Campround and access. Railroad bridge. 24 93.4 Dam. 47.2 State Highway 71 bridge. 2323 10 7575 91.9 State Highway 29 bridge. 37.5 County Highway 90 bridge. 2121 Elmo WMA Moran 91.9(R) State Highway 29 carry in access. 34.2 (R) Carry in access, city of Browerville. 2424 2424 202202 2424 91.1 Miltona Carlos Road bridge. 33.0 County Highway 14 bridge. Bertha 66 28 LONG 89.3 Soo Line Railroad bridge. 29.1 County Highway 79 bridge. 74 Philbrook 86.4 County Highway 65 bridge. 27.9- Long Prairie State WMA. WMA 40 Shamin 84.0 County Highway 3 bridge. 24.0 74 15 eau Lake 79.9 County Highway 3 bridge. 26.0 (R) Long Prairie WMA carry in access. 1 County Highway 3 bridge. 21.9 77.1 Oak Ridge Road bridge. 7 72.7 County Highway 1 bridge. 19.0 400th Street bridge. Brook 66.9 County Highway 69 bridge.
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Atlas of Wadena County, Minnesota
    Prepared and Published with the Support of COUNTY ATLAS SERIES ATLAS C-40, PART A MINNESOTA GEOLOGICAL SURVEY THE WADENA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, AND Wadena County Harvey Thorleifson, Director the Minnesota Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative-CitiZen Commission on Minnesota Resources, Plate 2—Bedrock Geology AND the Minnesota Legacy Amendment'S Clean Water Fund 95° 7' 30" 95° 94° 52' 30" R. 33 W. HUBBARD COUNTY R. 35 W. R. 34 W. HUBBARD COUNTY A Ku 420 435 420 Blueberry 420 Lower 6 1 420 420 River 6 420 1 435 Twin 6 ]71 Amv Lake 1 Blueberry 420 Acg Shell River 420 River Aif 420 Acg BEDROCK GEOLOGY 420 WAD-3 CASS COUNTY Lake 420 435Kettle Acd 420 87 420 ) Stocking Wing By River Lake BLUEBERRY SHELL RIVER 420 Amy L. Radakovich and V.W. Chandler T. 138 N. T. 138 N. Finn Acg Menahga 420 HUNTERSVILLE Jim Cook 420 Lake Crow � Aif Lake 420 46° 45' 46° 45' dn Spirit LOCATION DIAGRAM Lake 2016 )87 420 420 450 435 420 420 Acv Acg Burgen �as Lake 31 36 Acd Creek 36 31 31 36 CORRELATION OF MAP UNITS BECKER COUNTY 435 450 Acv 420 1 6 1 6 420 1 6 INTRUSIVE ROCKS SUPRACRUSTAL ROCKS 435 Yaeger Lake p 420 m Ku Cretaceous MESOZOIC a 420 w Mud S unconformity Cat Lake River Foreland basin, ANIMIKIE GROUP as 450 420 Penokean orogen Kenora-Kabetogama dike swarm PALEO- OTTER TAIL COUNTY TAIL OTTER ]71 Intrusions of PROTEROZOIC Rice Aci 435 Lake uncertain age dn dr 420 ig 420 B Kitten 435 420 Am Ag WAWA SUBPROVINCE Creek 420 ORTON 435 Creek RED EYE MEADOW T.
    [Show full text]
  • Along the Mississippi from Rice Lake to Boom Lake
    Along the Mississippi from Rice Lake to Boom Lake by Ann M. Nelson August 9, 2018 Introduction Throughout the early days of Brainerd, the Mississippi river served as the highway for the millions and millions of logs driven to the sawmills of Minneapolis prior to the establishment of large sawmills on the river in Brainerd. The river acted as a storage area for the logs that were to remain in the city to be milled in its sawmills. Steamboats plied the river carrying equipment and other supplies to the logging camps of the northern woods as well as providing pleasure excursions for the citizens of Brainerd before the dam was completed in 1888. Much of the water used in homes and businesses was provided by the river until 1920 when the city completed the water tower and the system of wells which finally provided clean, uncontaminated water to Brainerd citizens. Over the years, numerous bridges were built over the Mississippi at Brainerd, ferries carried passengers across the river; parks, as well as sawmills, breweries and hospitals were located along its banks. Even Evergreen Cemetery is located near the river. For years, property within the city of Brainerd located near the river was considered the most undesirable and this is where the “red light” district was located. Steamboats The early steamers on the Mississippi burned wood and were used mostly to haul men and supplies to the lumber camps that dotted the shores of the river. Although not as profitable, steamboat owners also operated excursions and hauled farm produce from and supplies to the few farms that had been established near the river.
    [Show full text]
  • Crow Wing River Watershed TMDL (Wq-Iw8-45E)
    Crow Wing River Watershed TMDL Quantification of the pollutant reductions needed to improve lake and stream water quality impairments due to excess phosphorus, excess bacteria, or high water temperature. August 2014 wq-iw8-45e Authors and contributors: Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc: Meghan Jacobson, PhD Pat Conrad Camilla Correll Luke Nolby Sean Marczewski Etoile Jensen Annie Weeks Bonnie Finnerty, MPCA Kevin Stroom, MPCA Mark Evenson, MPCA John Erdmann, PhD, PE, MPCA Doug Kingsley and Mike Kelly, Park Rapids MN DNR-Fisheries Darrin Hoverson, Park Rapids MN DNR-Ecological and Water Resources (Area Hydrologist) Anne Oldakowski, Wadena SWCD Melissa Barrick, Crow Wing SWCD Julie Kingsley and Melissa Koebernick, Hubbard SWCD Sibley Lake Assocation Mayo Lake Association Blueberry Lake Association Twin Lakes Association Crow Wing River Watershed TMDL • August 2014 Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Table of Contents List of Figures .................................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iv List of Acronyms .......................................................................................................................... vii TMDL SUMMARY TABLE ......................................................................................................... ix EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .........................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Map of the Mississippi River State Water Trail from Brainerd to Little Falls
    © 2019, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources MISSISSIPPI RIVER ABOUT THE WATER TRAIL CONTACTS STATE WATER TRAIL In this section, the Mississippi River flows out of forest and wetlands and into a narrow valley surrounded DNR INFORMATION CENTER 500 Lafayette Rd. by sandplains. Below the confluence with the Nokasippi River, the Mississippi flows through a flat valley MAP 6 - BRAINERD TO LITTLE FALLS St. Paul, MN 55155-4040 bordered by hills. You’ll see vegetation along the shoreline and farmland beyond. Riffles are present at (888) 646-6367 Pipe Island and downriver to the State Highway 115 bridge. These riffles are made by rock bars that [email protected] create small standing waves. Navigating the riffles is difficult for even the smallest boat’s motor. DNR REGION 2 On the west side of the river, the Camp Ripley Military Reservation extends 18 miles downstream of the HEADQUARTERS Grand Rapids, MN 55744 Crow Wing River confluence. The land is owned by the State of Minnesota and managed by the (218) 328-8980 Minnesota Department of Military Affairs. Islands along the river corridor owned by Camp Ripley are open to public recreational use. Access to the Camp Ripley Training Center is not allowed from any point CROW WING STATE PARK along the Mississippi or Crow Wing rivers. 3124 State Park Road Brainerd, MN 56401 (218) 825-3075 Hazards include dams. Be aware of their locations and know where to portage. You’ll pass many islands on this section of the river. mndnr.gov/crowwing CHARLES A. LINDBERGH STATE PARK TRIP PLANNING AND SAFETY WATERCRAFT CAMPING 1615 Lindbergh Drive South Little Falls, MN 56345 • Plan your trip with a map before you leave.
    [Show full text]
  • The Condition of Rivers and Streams in Minnesota, Based on Probabilistic Surveys, 1995-2011 Report
    This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp The Condition of Rivers and Streams in Minnesota Based on Probabilistic Surveys, 1995-2011 April 2014 Authors April Lueck Scott Niemela Contributors/acknowledgements Daniel Helwig Glenn Skuta Tony Olson Tom Kincaid The MPCA is reducing printing and mailing costs John Genet by using the Internet to distribute reports and Joel Chirhart information to wider audience. Visit our Kristofor Parson website for more information. John Sandburg MPCA reports are printed on 100% post- Andrew Petersen consumer recycled content paper North Biological Monitoring Unit manufactured without chlorine or chlorine South Biological Monitoring Unit derivatives. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency 520 Lafayette Road North | Saint Paul, MN 55155-4194 | www.pca.state.mn.us | 651-296-6300 Toll free 800-657-3864 | TTY 651-282-5332 This report is available in alternative formats upon request, and online at www.pca.state.mn.us . Document number: wq-bsm1-08 Contents Executive summary .................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................... 3 Methods ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • ATVAM News - June 14, 2018 Newsletter of the ATV Association of Minnesota (Est
    ATVAM News - June 14, 2018 Newsletter of the ATV Association of Minnesota (Est. 1983) Send us your comments, club news, photos and article ideas. Email them to: [email protected]. Forward this email to club partners and business sponsors if they aren't ATVAM members already. ATVAM members should be receiving this newsletter and MN OffRoad magazine. Let us know if you're not. Please note: Send member renewals to new mailing address: ATVAM, PO Box 300, Stacy, MN 55079 E-newsletters are now archived on atvam.org to refer back to on topics. In This e-Newsletter: -ATV Legislative Update For Session Just Ended -DNR Moves "Free Wheelin' Weekend" To September -Side-by-Sides: 10 Years In The Making -Ribbon-Cutting Held For New ATV Park In SW Minnesota -Resources For Parents Of Children Who Want To Ride -Club Rides & Work Days Coming Up -Thanks For Supporting ATV Minnesota ATVAM Legislative Update For Session Just Ended By Ray Bohn & Tom Hackbarth ATVAM Lobbyists May 28, 2018 (also printed in the June/July Minnesota OffRoad magazine) While ATVAM initiatives faired very well on paper in the 2018 Legislative Session, because of the inability of the legislative majority and the governor to come to compromises on big ticket items, pretty much all was lost to the governor's veto of the Omnibus Supplemental Finance Bill. With a large percentage of policy language and all finance legislation placed in one large bill (990 pages - -- SF3656) instead of in singular subjects, it placed the entire bill in jeopardy of a veto on any single policy issue within the bill.
    [Show full text]
  • Red River of the North “A Winding Journey to History
    RED RIVER OF THE NORTH “A WINDING JOURNEY TO HISTORY” Headwaters at Breckenridge, Minnesota, U.S.A. By NEOMA A. LAKEN 2010 CONTENTS WELCOME FOREWORD INTRODUCTION CHAPTER 1 General Information CHAPTER 2 Prehistoric Heritage CHAPTER 3 Converging Rivers CHAPTER 4 Steamboats, Flatboats & Barges CHAPTER 5 Graham’s Point, Pre-1819 Trading Post CHAPTER 6 Red River Oxcarts CHAPTER 7 Fort Abercrombie, Dakota Territory CHAPTER 8 Sister River Cities: Breckenridge, MN Wahpeton, ND CHAPTER 9 Red River of the North Flooding CHAPTER 10 Flora and Fauna CHAPTER 11 Renewed Vision for the Red River of the North EPILOG REFERENCES - 2 - WELCOME... Breckenridge, Wilkin County, Minnesota, United States of America, and Wahpeton, Richland County, North Dakota, United States of America, welcome you to the Red River of the North. Some of the information contained comes from the records in the office of the County Recorder, in the Wilkin County Courthouse, Breckenridge MN. Some is local historical lore passed on to generations throughout the years and told to the author. While yet other information is a meshing of historical facts. As with the telling of any history, sagas differ slightly with the various perspectives of the authors. I hope you will find your visit to the Red River of the North a pleasant one. Enjoy your visit . and come back soon! Neoma A. Laken, Author 108 North 15th Street Breckenridge, Minnesota 56520 United States of America All rights in and to this book reserved by author. No portion may be reprinted without permission. Additional copies of this book are available from River Keepers, 325 7th St South, Fargo, ND 58103, www.riverkeepers.org for a cost of $10.
    [Show full text]
  • Brainerd Area
    R34W R33W R32W R31W R30W R0W R29W R0W R28W R27W R26W R25W R25W R27W R26W R25W R24W 95°0'0"W 94°55'0"W 94°50'0"W 94°45'0"W 94°40'0"W 94°35'0"W 94°30'0"W 94°25'0"W 94°20'0"W 94°15'0"W 94°10'0"W 94°5'0"W 94°0'0"W 93°55'0"W 93°50'0"W 93°45'0"W 93°40'0"W 93°35'0"W 93°30'0"W 93°25'0"W 93°20'0"W Steamboat River Blandin Dam Trout 1 6 1 6 1 6 6 Sugar Point Bog 1 6 1 6 Poole Bay 47°13'55"N Little Bear Creek 1 6 La Prairie Laporte Bear River 1 159 Buffalo Creek Garfield Swamp Goose Vermillion River Meyers Bay 146 501 Rice 190 Lake George 320 Battleground State Forest Leighton Brook Prairie RiverGunn 47°11'55"N MN12 304 326 Rice 170 George 219 36 31 Sugar Bay GPZ T55N 36 31 36 31 36 Elevenmile Corner 119 Steamboat Bay 47°11'55"N Bemidji Area Kabekona RiverGulch Creek Salter Bay 129 Skunk Brook Sugar Brook King Bay 412 Boy Bay Boy River 1 6 100 T143N 1 6 1 6 1 Dan Dick Creek Pokegama Blackberry 47°9'55"N 220 212 ¤£2 36 31 Y49 Boy River Kabekona Benedict 36 36 31 Welshes Bay 36 31 Sucker Branch 36 31 36 31 Sherry Arm Bay 47°9'55"N 36 31 Philbin 1 36 31 Sugar 6 Kabekona River 6 36 Siseebakwet 1 6 1 6 1 Traders Bay Leech EWM 1 6 Wendigo Arm Bay 47°7'55"N 1 6 1 6 9995 Kabekona Bay 1 Remer State Forest 370 T54N Baker 295 Deer River Area 47°7'55"N Big Thunder Peak Agency Bay Smith Creek B1 B2 Onigum Headquarters Bay Tobique 36 31 36 31 47°5'55"N Walker Walker Bay 36 31 36 T142N Boy Golden Anniversary State Forest 416 412 Loon Lake Dam 1 6 1 6 1 6 1 47°5'55"N 155 North Fork Willow River Kaylor Fishpond Dam Brevik Swift River 259 36 31 261 Uram Bay Emmaville
    [Show full text]
  • Portage Lake Template Lake Management Plan
    (Draft) Lake Management Plan for Portage Lake Hubbard County, Minnesota Revised: September 26, 2006 Healthy Lakes & Rivers Partnership Committee Portage Lake Association 1 Draft- Table of Contents Management Plan for Portage Lake I. Introduction: Summary of Healthy Lakes & Rivers Partnership Program Physical Description of your lake or drainage Watershed size Watershed Hydrology Precipitation Soils Land Use History of development/impacts on your lake Organizational history a) mission b) structure c) accomplishments II. Review of historical and existing conditions for each of eight focus areas: Water Quality Fisheries Management Plans Aquatic vegetation Wildlife Invasive Species Land Use and zoning Managing water surface use conflicts Public water access III. Summary/Conclusion Outcome of Visioning Session IV. Priorities and Action Plans Appendices Department of Natural Resource Fisheries Management Plan Glossary Guide to Common Acronyms and abbreviations 2 Introduction In June 2005 the Portage Lake Association was invited to participate in the Northwest Minnesota Foundation’s Healthy Lakes and Rivers Partnership program along with seven other lake and river Associations in Hubbard County. Under the coordination of William Alden and Alicia Laturnus (Hubbard Soil and Water Conservation District) and Ken Grob (Hubbard County Lakes and Rivers Association), representatives of each group attended two days of training on strategic planning, communication, and nonprofit group leadership. Representatives of many state and local agencies, as well
    [Show full text]
  • 11.0 Rec Areas Sandp
    North Dakota Pipeline Company LLC Minnesota Environmental Information Report Routing Permit Docket No. PL-6668/PPL-13-474 Revised January 2014 Certificate of Need Docket No. PL-6668/CN-13-473 Page 11-1 11.0 FEDERAL, STATE, AND COUNTY RECREATIONAL AREAS 11.1 EXISTING DESIGNATED RECREATIONAL AREAS The preferred route will not cross any national parks, national forests, national landmarks, wilderness areas, wildlife refuges, waterfowl production areas, or national wildlife management areas. However, the Project will cross a federally designated trail, state and county forests, county parks, state WMAs and AMAs, state-designated trails, designated scenic byways, and state-designated water trails as discussed in the following subsections. 11.1.1 Federally Designated Recreation Areas and Trails The preferred route will not cross federal recreation areas. However, the North Country Trail, a National Scenic Trail, will be crossed at MP 417.6 in Hubbard County. NDPC initiated consultation with NPS and the North Country Trail Association regarding this crossing. Because the trail is on county-owned land, NDPC will also consult with Hubbard County to minimize impacts on the trail. As discussed in Section 9.2, the preferred route will cross four Minnesota rivers that are listed on the NRI. These rivers are the Red Lake River (MP 305.7 and 325.7) in Polk County, the Clearwater River (MP 388.3) in Clearwater County, the Moose River (MP 511.4, MP 512.6, MP 513.5 and MP 513.8) in Cass and Aitkin counties, and the Willow River in Aitkin County (MP 531.2). None of these are federally designated as National Wild and Scenic River.
    [Show full text]