Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Washington and Oregon Apple Orchards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Washington and Oregon Apple Orchards HORTICULTURAL ENTOMOLOGY Phenology of Lacanobia subjuncta (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Washington and Oregon Apple Orchards MICHAEL D. DOERR, JAY F. BRUNNER, AND VINCENT P. JONES Washington State University Tree Fruit Research and Extension Center, 1100 N. Western Avenue, Wenatchee, WA 98801 J. Econ. Entomol. 98(6): 2100Ð2106 (2005) ABSTRACT The phenology of Lacanobia subjuncta (Grote & Robinson) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) was investigated in 30 apple orchards in central Washington state and northeastern Oregon from 1998 to 2001 (57 total orchard-yr). Adult captures in pheromone-baited traps were Þt to a Weibull distribution to model emergence of the Þrst and second generations. Initial capture of Þrst generation adults was observed at 216.2 Ϯ 2.6 degree-days (DD) (mean Ϯ SEM) from 1 March by using a base temperature of 6.7ЊC. The model predicted that ßight was 5 and 95% complete by 240 and 700 degree-days (DD), respectively. Monitoring of oviposition and hatch was used to establish a protandry plus preoviposition degree-day requirement of 160.0 Ϯ 7.7 DD, as well as to provide data to describe the entire hatch period. Egg hatch was 5 and 95% complete by 395 and 630 DD, respectively. The start of the second ßight was observed at 1217.1 Ϯ 8.3 DD by using an upper threshold for development of 32ЊC and a horizontal cutoff. The model indicated that the second ßight was 5 and 95% complete by 1220 and 1690 DD, respectively. Second generation hatch was 5 and 95% complete by 1440 and 1740 DD, respectively. A discussion of the potential uses of these detailed phenology data in optimizing management strategies is presented. KEY WORDS Lacanobia subjuncta, degree-days, phenology model, pest management, Weibull distribution Lacanobia subjuncta (Grote & Robinson) (Lepidop- this study) averaged 44 d but ranged from 34 to 57 d. tera: Noctuidae) occurs throughout North America We feel this variation can be explained by differences and feeds on a variety of plants (Landolt 1997, Mc- in temperature accumulations between sites and Cabe 1980), including row crops, shrubs, trees, and years. Knowledge of the larval-age distribution in the several weed species (e.g., dandelion, bindweed, and Þeld is important for timing of sampling and insecti- mallow). In the mid-1990s, larvae of this insect became cide applications for management of L. subjuncta (Do- a pest of apples in central Washington state and parts err et al. 2004). Visual monitoring of larvae is labor- of northeastern Oregon (Brunner and Doerr 2000). intensive and also has proven to be a difÞcult method Insecticides are the primary means of control for L. for timing insecticide applications. To optimize insec- subjuncta. Although general information on the phe- ticide efÞcacy and minimize nontarget impacts, a nology of L. subjuncta is available, there is a lack of more precise determination of L. subjuncta phenology sufÞcient detail or predictive capabilities for making is necessary. integrated pest management (IPM) decisions. Landolt Doerr et al. (2002) reported lower temperature (1998) reported two generations on apples in Wash- thresholds for egg, larval, and pupal development and ington. He also reported that L. subjuncta overwinter estimated degree-days required to complete each im- as pupae in the soil and emerge as adults in May and mature life stage. However, these data alone were not June. Larvae of the Þrst generation are present from sufÞcient to develop phenology predictions that de- early June through July. A second adult ßight occurs scribed L. subjuncta development through the entire in July and August with larvae present in August and growing season. SpeciÞcally, information is needed on September. Landolt and Smithhisler (1998) discov- emergence of Þrst and second generation adults, de- ered that adult activity could be monitored with the gree-day requirements for any protandry and preovi- use of a sex pheromone; however, our experience has position period, and Þrst and second generation egg shown that trap captures do not provide a reliable hatch periods. Doerr et al. (2004) explained the im- method of timing insecticides. A random selection of portance of being able to predict a time after the 20 orchards from 2000 to 2001 studied for this current majority of egg hatch was complete but before the manuscript indicated the number of days from initial oldest larvae reach the fourth instar. They presented adult capture to an optimal spray timing (presented in data that suggested this would be an optimal time for 0022-0493/05/2100Ð2106$04.00/0 ᭧ 2005 Entomological Society of America December 2005 DOERR ET AL.: PHENOLOGY OF L. subjuncta 2101 applying insecticide inputs that could maximize con- bucket. To optimize collection of larvae, sampling was trol while reducing the need for further applications. conducted in a targeted, nonsystematic manner rather In this article, we develop a predictive model for Þrst than a random sample or structured sampling proto- and second generation adult ßight periods, estimate col. Targeted sampling of trees and weed hosts was the protandry plus preoviposition requirement, and conducted on plants showing recent damage typical of describe both egg hatch periods. Data from intensive L. subjuncta feeding. Visual inspection was done at Þeld sampling of larvae are presented along with a each orchard to locate areas of larval infestation. This discussion that explains how this information will be initial screening was done for 15Ð30 min, and any useful in optimizing management strategies, especially larvae located on trees or weeds during this inspection timing of insecticide applications. were collected. Trees with recent feeding damage were then sampled with a limb-jarring method (Burts and Retan 1973). A beating tray (45 by 45 cm) was Materials and Methods held under a tree limb showing feeding damage, and Adult ßight activity was monitored by placing one the limb was struck three times with a stiff rubber multipurpose bucket style trap (Unitraps, Phero Tech, hose. Dislodged larvae that landed on the tray were Inc., Delta, British Columbia, Canada) in each of 30 collected. Approximately 25Ð50 trees were sampled by apple orchards in central Washington and northeast- limb jarring at each orchard visit. Once a tree was ern Oregon from 1998 to 2001 (57 total orchard-yr). selected for limb-jar sampling, several limbs were sam- Traps were baited with an L. subjuncta sex pheromone pled to ensure that larvae that have moved from ob- lure (Peter Landolt, USDAÐARS, Wapato, WA), and vious feeding sites also could be collected. Weed hosts a 12.5-cm2 Vaportape II insecticidal strip (Hercon showing feeding damage were picked or cut off at Environmental Co., Emigsville, PA) was placed in the ground level and shaken into a 20-liter bucket. Dis- bottom of each trap to prevent moth escape. Lures lodged larvae were collected from the bucket. Weed were replaced at 6-wk intervals. Traps in each orchard hosts most prone to L. subjuncta infestations and thus were monitored once per week from full bloom in most sampled were lambÕs-quarter, Chenopodium al- apple, Malus domestica Borkhausen ÔDeliciousÕ, until bum L.; sow thistle, Sonchus sp.; bindweed, Convolvu- late summer of each year, and the number of adult L. lus arvensis L.; and mallow, Malva neglecta Wallroth. subjuncta males was recorded. Approximately 25 infested weeds were sampled at In 2000Ð2001, all immature life stages of L. subjuncta each orchard visit. However, this number was inßu- were monitored in six orchards from central Wash- enced by the amount of weeds in the orchard and the ington with high population levels (12 orchard-yr). relative infestation levels of trees and weeds, which The relative abundance of each life stage (eggs and varied from orchard to orchard. Larval sampling was L1ÐL6 instars) was determined by sampling orchard set at 2 person-h per day, and samples were conducted trees and ground cover weeds at regular intervals, two times per week (4 person-h per week). Larvae described in detail below, throughout the growing were collected and returned to the laboratory where season. Samples were generally collected three times head capsule width and instar stage were recorded per week, with one or two orchards visited per day. (Doerr et al. 2002). We collected 3,552 larvae over the Oviposition and egg hatch were monitored by ex- duration of this study. amining the underside of apple leaves. Fresh egg Temperature data were collected at each site by masses were ßagged and monitored daily for hatch. placing a max-min temperature recorder (Datascribe Orchard sampling for egg masses was set at two per- Jr., Avatel, Inc., Fort Bragg, CA) inside white Ste- son-hours per day (total for all orchards visited on that phenson weather shelter. The weather shelter was day), and sampling was conducted three times per placed within the canopy of a tree in the interior of the week (6 person-h per wk). Seventy-nine egg masses orchard. Degree-day accumulations at each site were were ßagged during the Þrst oviposition period in calculated using a single sine-wave method (Basker- 2000. The difference between initial adult male cap- ville and Emin 1969) from daily maximum and mini- tures and the Þrst observed egg mass at each orchard mum temperatures and a base threshold of 6.7ЊC (Do- was considered the preoviposition period, which in- err et al. 2002). Degee-day accumulations began at all cluded any protandry. During the second generation, locations on 1 March. The upper threshold for devel- detection of unhatched egg masses was difÞcult (only opment and the degree-day accumulation cutoff seven total egg masses from four orchards) because method were established using male moth ßight data. eggs were laid lower in the trees, on alternate hosts in The best combination of upper threshold and cutoff the orchard ground cover, or both.
Recommended publications
  • Autographa Gamma
    1 Table of Contents Table of Contents Authors, Reviewers, Draft Log 4 Introduction to the Reference 6 Soybean Background 11 Arthropods 14 Primary Pests of Soybean (Full Pest Datasheet) 14 Adoretus sinicus ............................................................................................................. 14 Autographa gamma ....................................................................................................... 26 Chrysodeixis chalcites ................................................................................................... 36 Cydia fabivora ................................................................................................................. 49 Diabrotica speciosa ........................................................................................................ 55 Helicoverpa armigera..................................................................................................... 65 Leguminivora glycinivorella .......................................................................................... 80 Mamestra brassicae....................................................................................................... 85 Spodoptera littoralis ....................................................................................................... 94 Spodoptera litura .......................................................................................................... 106 Secondary Pests of Soybean (Truncated Pest Datasheet) 118 Adoxophyes orana ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve
    SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Alberta Species at Risk Report No. 159 SURVEY OF LEPIDOPTERA OF THE WAINWRIGHT DUNES ECOLOGICAL RESERVE Doug Macaulay Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159 Project Partners: i ISBN 978-1-4601-3449-8 ISSN 1496-7146 Photo: Doug Macaulay of Pale Yellow Dune Moth ( Copablepharon grandis ) For copies of this report, visit our website at: http://www.aep.gov.ab.ca/fw/speciesatrisk/index.html This publication may be cited as: Macaulay, A. D. 2016. Survey of Lepidoptera of the Wainwright Dunes Ecological Reserve. Alberta Species at Risk Report No.159. Alberta Environment and Parks, Edmonton, AB. 31 pp. ii DISCLAIMER The views and opinions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the policies of the Department or the Alberta Government. iii Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ............................................................................................... vi EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................... vi 1.0 Introduction ................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 STUDY AREA ............................................................................................................. 2 3.0 METHODS ................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 RESULTS ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Hadeninae) Species of Iran
    Turk J Zool 2012; 36(6): 752-758 © TÜBİTAK Research Article doi:10.3906/zoo-1111-15 A survey of the Perigrapha Lederer (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Hadeninae) species of Iran Asghar SHIRVANI1,*, Mohammad Ali SHOGHALI2, Shamsi FEIZPOOR3 1Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, 76169-133 Kerman – IRAN 2No. 51, 24 Azar Street, Kerman – IRAN 3Young Researchers Society, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman – IRAN Received: 14.11.2011 ● Accepted: 25.03.2012 Abstract: Four species of the genus Perigrapha Lederer are reviewed in Iran. Two species, P. annau Varga & Ronkay, 1991 and P. fl ora Hreblay, 1996, are reported for the fi rst time from the fauna of Iran. Adult and genitalia images are illustrated and identifi cation keys for the external and genital features are given. Key words: Perigrapha, Iran, new records, identifi cation key Introduction large-scale variation in morphological features and Th e tribe Orthosiini Guenée, 1837, with 7 genera relegated them as members of 3 genera, Anorthoa, (Panolis Hübner, [1821], Dioszeghyana Hreblay, Harutaeographa, and Perigrapha. 1993, Orthosia Ochsenheimer, 1816, Anorthoa Berio, Perigrapha, a Holarctic genus belonging to the 1980, Harutaeographa Yoshimoto, 1993, Perigrapha perigraphoid generic complex with hairy eyes typical Lederer, 1857, and Egira Duponchel, 1845), is for the subfamily Hadeninae (sensu Hampson), represented by early-fl ying, univoltine species that comprises 3 subgenera, Opacographa Hreblay, 1996, prefer mountainous and semimountainous regions Rororthosia Beck, 1999, and Perigrapha Lederer, in Iran. Th e classifi cation and taxonomic rank of 1857. Th is genus is represented in Europe by the species groups within this tribe has been a matter last 2 subgenera and 4 species (Ronkay et al., 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • Check List of Noctuid Moths (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae And
    Бiологiчний вiсник МДПУ імені Богдана Хмельницького 6 (2), стор. 87–97, 2016 Biological Bulletin of Bogdan Chmelnitskiy Melitopol State Pedagogical University, 6 (2), pp. 87–97, 2016 ARTICLE UDC 595.786 CHECK LIST OF NOCTUID MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA: NOCTUIDAE AND EREBIDAE EXCLUDING LYMANTRIINAE AND ARCTIINAE) FROM THE SAUR MOUNTAINS (EAST KAZAKHSTAN AND NORTH-EAST CHINA) A.V. Volynkin1, 2, S.V. Titov3, M. Černila4 1 Altai State University, South Siberian Botanical Garden, Lenina pr. 61, Barnaul, 656049, Russia. E-mail: [email protected] 2 Tomsk State University, Laboratory of Biodiversity and Ecology, Lenina pr. 36, 634050, Tomsk, Russia 3 The Research Centre for Environmental ‘Monitoring’, S. Toraighyrov Pavlodar State University, Lomova str. 64, KZ-140008, Pavlodar, Kazakhstan. E-mail: [email protected] 4 The Slovenian Museum of Natural History, Prešernova 20, SI-1001, Ljubljana, Slovenia. E-mail: [email protected] The paper contains data on the fauna of the Lepidoptera families Erebidae (excluding subfamilies Lymantriinae and Arctiinae) and Noctuidae of the Saur Mountains (East Kazakhstan). The check list includes 216 species. The map of collecting localities is presented. Key words: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Erebidae, Asia, Kazakhstan, Saur, fauna. INTRODUCTION The fauna of noctuoid moths (the families Erebidae and Noctuidae) of Kazakhstan is still poorly studied. Only the fauna of West Kazakhstan has been studied satisfactorily (Gorbunov 2011). On the faunas of other parts of the country, only fragmentary data are published (Lederer, 1853; 1855; Aibasov & Zhdanko 1982; Hacker & Peks 1990; Lehmann et al. 1998; Benedek & Bálint 2009; 2013; Korb 2013). In contrast to the West Kazakhstan, the fauna of noctuid moths of East Kazakhstan was studied inadequately.
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera
    EN62CH15-Mitter ARI 5 November 2016 12:1 I Review in Advance first posted online V E W E on November 16, 2016. (Changes may R S still occur before final publication online and in print.) I E N C N A D V A Phylogeny and Evolution of Lepidoptera Charles Mitter,1,∗ Donald R. Davis,2 and Michael P. Cummings3 1Department of Entomology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742; email: [email protected] 2Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20560 3Laboratory of Molecular Evolution, Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742 Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017. 62:265–83 Keywords Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2017.62. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org The Annual Review of Entomology is online at Hexapoda, insect, systematics, classification, butterfly, moth, molecular ento.annualreviews.org systematics This article’s doi: Access provided by University of Maryland - College Park on 11/20/16. For personal use only. 10.1146/annurev-ento-031616-035125 Abstract Copyright c 2017 by Annual Reviews. Until recently, deep-level phylogeny in Lepidoptera, the largest single ra- All rights reserved diation of plant-feeding insects, was very poorly understood. Over the past ∗ Corresponding author two decades, building on a preceding era of morphological cladistic stud- ies, molecular data have yielded robust initial estimates of relationships both within and among the ∼43 superfamilies, with unsolved problems now yield- ing to much larger data sets from high-throughput sequencing. Here we summarize progress on lepidopteran phylogeny since 1975, emphasizing the superfamily level, and discuss some resulting advances in our understanding of lepidopteran evolution.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Declines in the Anthropocene
    EN65CH23_Wagner ARjats.cls December 19, 2019 12:24 Annual Review of Entomology Insect Declines in the Anthropocene David L. Wagner Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut 06269, USA; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020. 65:457–80 Keywords First published as a Review in Advance on insect decline, agricultural intensi!cation, climate change, drought, October 14, 2019 precipitation extremes, bees, pollinator decline, vertebrate insectivores The Annual Review of Entomology is online at ento.annualreviews.org Abstract https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-ento-011019- Insect declines are being reported worldwide for "ying, ground, and aquatic 025151 lineages. Most reports come from western and northern Europe, where the Copyright © 2020 by Annual Reviews. insect fauna is well-studied and there are considerable demographic data for All rights reserved many taxonomically disparate lineages. Additional cases of faunal losses have been noted from Asia, North America, the Arctic, the Neotropics, and else- where. While this review addresses both species loss and population declines, its emphasis is on the latter. Declines of abundant species can be especially worrisome, given that they anchor trophic interactions and shoulder many Access provided by 73.198.242.105 on 01/29/20. For personal use only. of the essential ecosystem services of their respective communities. A review of the factors believed to be responsible for observed collapses and those Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2020.65:457-480. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org perceived to be especially threatening to insects form the core of this treat- ment. In addition to widely recognized threats to insect biodiversity, e.g., habitat destruction, agricultural intensi!cation (including pesticide use), cli- mate change, and invasive species, this assessment highlights a few less com- monly considered factors such as atmospheric nitri!cation from the burning of fossil fuels and the effects of droughts and changing precipitation patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Trapping Lacanobia Subjuncta, Xestia C-Nigrum, and Mamestra Configurata
    Trapping Lacanobia subjuncta, Xestia c-nigrum, and Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with Acetic Acid and 3-Methyl-1-butanol in Controlled Release Dispensers Author(s): Peter J. Landolt and Joshua F. Alfaro Source: Environmental Entomology, 30(4):656-662. 2001. Published By: Entomological Society of America DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-30.4.656 URL: http://www.bioone.org/doi/full/10.1603/0046-225X-30.4.656 BioOne (www.bioone.org) is a nonprofit, online aggregation of core research in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences. BioOne provides a sustainable online platform for over 170 journals and books published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses. Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Web site, and all posted and associated content indicates your acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/page/terms_of_use. Usage of BioOne content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non-commercial use. Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as copyright holder. BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to critical research. PHYSIOLOGICAL AND CHEMICAL ECOLOGY Trapping Lacanobia subjuncta, Xestia c-nigrum, and Mamestra configurata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) with Acetic Acid and 3-Methyl-1-butanol in Controlled Release Dispensers PETER J. LANDOLT AND JOSHUA F. ALFARO USDAÐARS, 5230 Konnowac Pass Road, Wapato, WA 98951 Environ. Entomol. 30(4): 656Ð662 (2001) ABSTRACT Both sexes of the noctuid moths Lacanobia subjuncta (Grote & Robinson), Mamestra configurata Walker (bertha armyworm) and Xestia c-nigrum (L.) (spotted cutworm) are attracted to the combination of acetic acid and 3-methyl-1-butanol (isoamyl alcohol).
    [Show full text]
  • Scottish Macro-Moth List, 2015
    Notes on the Scottish Macro-moth List, 2015 This list aims to include every species of macro-moth reliably recorded in Scotland, with an assessment of its Scottish status, as guidance for observers contributing to the National Moth Recording Scheme (NMRS). It updates and amends the previous lists of 2009, 2011, 2012 & 2014. The requirement for inclusion on this checklist is a minimum of one record that is beyond reasonable doubt. Plausible but unproven species are relegated to an appendix, awaiting confirmation or further records. Unlikely species and known errors are omitted altogether, even if published records exist. Note that inclusion in the Scottish Invertebrate Records Index (SIRI) does not imply credibility. At one time or another, virtually every macro-moth on the British list has been reported from Scotland. Many of these claims are almost certainly misidentifications or other errors, including name confusion. However, because the County Moth Recorder (CMR) has the final say, dubious Scottish records for some unlikely species appear in the NMRS dataset. A modern complication involves the unwitting transportation of moths inside the traps of visiting lepidopterists. Then on the first night of their stay they record a species never seen before or afterwards by the local observers. Various such instances are known or suspected, including three for my own vice-county of Banffshire. Surprising species found in visitors’ traps the first time they are used here should always be regarded with caution. Clerical slips – the wrong scientific name scribbled in a notebook – have long caused confusion. An even greater modern problem involves errors when computerising the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.A New Species of Lacanobia Billberg, 1820 from Turkmenistan
    SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología ISSN: 0300-5267 [email protected] Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología España Volynkin, A. V. A new species of Lacanobia Billberg, 1820 from Turkmenistan (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) SHILAP Revista de Lepidopterología, vol. 45, núm. 180, diciembre, 2017, pp. 669-672 Sociedad Hispano-Luso-Americana de Lepidopterología Madrid, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=45553890019 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative SHILAP Revta. lepid., 45 (180) diciembre 2017: 669-672 eISSN: 2340-4078 ISSN: 0300-5267 A new species of Lacanobia Billberg, 1820 from Turkmenistan (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) A. V. Volynkin Abstract A new species of Lacanobia Billberg, 1820, L. (Lacanobia ) dubatolovi Volynkin, sp. n. (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae) is described from the West Kopetdagh Mountains, Turkmenistan. A diagnostic comparison is made with L. w-latinum (Hufnagel, 1766) and L. w-latinoides Gyulai & Ronkay, 1998. Imagines and male genitalia of the new and related species are illustrated. KEY WORD: Lepidoptera, Noctuidae, Lacanobia , new species, Turkmenistan. Una nueva especie de Lacanobia Billberg, 1820 de Turkmenistán (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) Resumen Se describe una nueva especie de Lacanobia Billberg, 1820, L. (Lacanobia ) dubatolovi Volynkin, sp. n. del oeste de la cordillera de Kopet-Dag, Turkmenistán. Se hace un diagnóstico comparando con L. w-latinum (Hufnagel, 1766) y L. w-latinoides Gyulai & Ronkay, 1998. Se ilustran los imagos y genitalia del macho de la nueva especie y las próxi- mas.
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the Beaver Island Archipelago, Lake Michigan
    The Great Lakes Entomologist Volume 24 Number 2 - Summer 1991 Number 2 - Summer Article 5 1991 June 1991 An Annotated Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the Beaver Island Archipelago, Lake Michigan. Dennis Profant Central Michigan University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle Part of the Entomology Commons Recommended Citation Profant, Dennis 1991. "An Annotated Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the Beaver Island Archipelago, Lake Michigan.," The Great Lakes Entomologist, vol 24 (2) Available at: https://scholar.valpo.edu/tgle/vol24/iss2/5 This Peer-Review Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Department of Biology at ValpoScholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in The Great Lakes Entomologist by an authorized administrator of ValpoScholar. For more information, please contact a ValpoScholar staff member at [email protected]. Profant: An Annotated Checklist of the Lepidoptera of the Beaver Island Ar 1991 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST 85 AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE LEPIDOPTERA OF THE BEAVER ISLAND ARCHIPELAGO, LAKE MICHIGAN. Dennis Profantl ABSTRACT A survey of Lepidoptera was conducted in 1987 and 1988 on Beaver Island, Lake Michigan. When combined with a 1930 survey of the Beaver Island Archipelago, 757 species from 41 families have now been recorded from these islands. Only one study has been published on the Lepidoptera of Beaver Island and the surrounding islands of Garden, High, Hog, Whiskey, Squaw, Trout, Gull, and Hat (Moore 1930). The present study has produced a more complete inventory of lepi­ dopteran species on Beaver Island. Collecting was done in a variety of habitats using several different light sources.
    [Show full text]
  • Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from the Neotropical Region Feeding on Asparagus and Cut Flowers
    SYSTEMATICS A New Pest Species of Copitarsia (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from the Neotropical Region Feeding on Asparagus and Cut Flowers 1 2 MICHAEL G. POGUE AND REBECCA B. SIMMONS Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 101(4): 743Ð762 (2008) ABSTRACT The egg, Þrst and last instars, and adult of Copitarsia corruda, n. sp. from Mexico, Colombia, Ecuador, and Peru are described and illustrated. Larval host plant genera include Asparagus (Liliaceae) (Mexico, Colombia, and Ecuador), Iris (Iridaceae) (Ecuador), Ammi (Apiaceae) (Ec- uador), Lysimachia (Primulaceae) (Colombia), Callistephus (Asteraceae) (Colombia), and Aster (Asteraceae) (Colombia). The larva of Copitarsia decolora (Guene´e) is described and illustrated. In addition to genitalic and larval characters, mitochondrial gene cytochrome oxidase I (COI) was analyzed to differentiate C. corruda from Copitarsia decolora (Guene´e), and to examine geographic and host plant differences between the two species. KEY WORDS cryptic species, mitochondrial DNA, morphology, agriculturally important species, phylogeny The identiÞcation of species, particularly agricultur- (Castillo and Angulo 1991, Arce de Hamity and Neder ally important pests, can be hampered by many fac- de Roman 1992). tors, including misidentiÞcation in the literature, This article provides diagnostic morphological char- misplacement at higher taxonomic levels, and mor- acters and molecular sequences for one of the cryptic phologically cryptic species. All of these situations species of the C. decolora complex (Simmons and occur in the noctuid genus Copitarsia Hampson, Scheffer 2004). This species is described formally, and 1906. Here, we address these three issues by de- locality data are provided. scribing a new pest species of Copitarsia that was revealed during a mitochondrial DNA study of a Materials and Methods group of morphologically similar populations of the Copitarsia decolora (Guene´ e) complex (Simmons Genitalia Dissections.
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuoid Moths (Lepidoptera, Noctuoidea) of the Southern Part of Karakalpakstan
    SJIF Impact Factor: 6.260| ISI I.F.Value:1.241| Journal DOI: 10.36713/epra2016 ISSN: 2455-7838(Online) EPRA International Journal of Research and Development (IJRD) Volume: 5 | Issue: 4 | April 2020 - Peer Reviewed Journal NOCTUOID MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA, NOCTUOIDEA) OF THE SOUTHERN PART OF KARAKALPAKSTAN Bekchanov Khudaybergan Urinovich Docent, Faculty of Pedagogy, Department of methodology of pre-school education, Urgench State University Bekchanova Mohira Khudaybergan qizi PhD student of Khorezm Ma’mun Academy ABSTRACT The paper presents the results of faunal studies of the Lepidoptera group Noctuoidea in the southern part of Karakalpakstan, as well as a review of the literature on this topic. An annotated list of 51 species of 3 families is given: Erebidae, Nolidae and Noctuidae, which also includes previously published data on finds in the region. KEY WORDS: noctuoid, moths, Lepidoptera, Erebidae, Nolidae, Noctuidae, Karakalpakstan, ephemera, ephemerids, bush INTRODUCTION Sviridov, 2003; Kononenko, 2005; Matov et al., 2008; The family of Noctuidae is the largest family of Kononenko, 2010). This work is devoted to the study of Lepidoptera. About 30 thousand species are known in the the fauna of Lepidaptera in the southern part of world fauna, and this figure can hardly be considered Karakalpakstan in the spring-summer period. final. Uzbekistan stands out for its significant species abundance and zoogeographic diversity of the moths. The AREA OF THE STUDY study of the Noctuidae fauna of Uzbekistan has always The studies were conducted in the southern part been associated with the study of the Lepidoptera fauna of Karakalpakstan. Ephemeral plants and ephemeroids, of the Khorezm oasis.
    [Show full text]