DOCSLIB.ORG

Let Your VOICE Be Heard! 2011-12 KBA Officers and Board of Governors

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Let Your VOICE Be Heard! 2011-12 KBA Officers and Board of Governors Let your VOICE be Heard! 2011-12 KBA Officers and Board of Governors PRESIDENT DISTRICT 2 (CON’T.) DISTRICT 10 Rachael K. Pirner Rep. Paul T. Davis Jeffery A. Mason (316) 630-8100 Wichita (785) 843-7674 Lawrence (785) 890-6588 Goodland [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] PRESIDENT-ELECT DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 11 Lee M. Smithyman Eric L. Rosenblad Nancy Morales Gonzalez (913) 661-9800 Overland Park (620) 232-1330 Pittsburg (816) 936-5788 Kansas City, Mo. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] VICE PRESIDENT DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 12 Dennis D. Depew William E. Muret William E. Quick (620) 325-2626 Neodesha (620) 221-7200 Winfield (816) 360-4335 Kansas City, Mo. [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] SECRETARY-TREASURER DISTRICT 5 AT-LARGE GOVERNOR Gerald L. Green Terri S. Bezek Gwynne Harris Birzer (620) 662-0537 Hutchinson (785) 296-2639 Topeka (316) 265-7741 Wichita [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] IMMEDIATE PAST PRESIDENT Natalie G. Haag KDJA REPRESENTATIVE Glenn R. Braun (785) 438-3121 Topeka Hon. Richard M. Smith (785) 625-6919 Hays [email protected] (913) 795-2622 Mound City [email protected] DISTRICT 6 [email protected] YOUNG LAWYERS SECTION PRESIDENT Bruce W. Kent KBA DELEGATE TO ABA Vincent M Cox (785) 556-2019 Manhattan Sara S. Beezley (785) 232-7761 Topeka [email protected] (620) 724-4111 Girard [email protected] DISTRICT 7 [email protected] DISTRICT 1 Matthew C. Hesse KBA DELEGATE TO ABA Gregory P. Goheen (316) 858-4924 Wichita Linda S. Parks (913) 371-3838 Kansas City, Kan. [email protected] (316) 265-7741 Wichita [email protected] J. Michael Kennalley [email protected] (316) 263-3200 Wichita Kip A. Kubin [email protected] ABA BOARD OF GOVERNORS (816) 531-8188 Kansas City, Mo. Thomas A. Hamill [email protected] Calvin D. Rider (316) 267-7361 x 157 Wichita (913) 491-5500 Overland Park Eric G. Kraft [email protected] [email protected] (913) 498-3536 Overland Park ABA STATE DELEGATE [email protected] DISTRICT 8 Hon. Christel E. Marquardt Mira Mdivani John B. Swearer (620) 662-3331 Hutchinson (785) 296-6146 Topeka (913) 317-6200 Overland Park [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 9 Jeffrey J. Alderman Charles E. Branson David J. Rebein (620) 227-8126 Dodge City (785) 234-5696 Topeka (785) 841-0211 Lawrence [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] July/August 2011 • Volume 80 • No. 7 The Journal THE Board of Editors OURNAL of the KANSAS BAR ASSOCIATION Your Partner in the Profession • www.ksbar.org Richard D. Ralls, Chair Shawnee Mission Aïda Marie Alaka Topeka J Terri Savely Bezek Topeka Hon. David E. Bruns Topeka Focus Boyd A. Byers Wichita Toby J. Crouse Overland Park Connie S. Hamilton Topeka Evan H. Ice Lawrence 28 Void Katharine J. Jackson Manhattan Michael T. Jilka Overland Park Enactments Lisa R. Jones Wichita Hon. Janice Miller Karlin Topeka of the Kansas Casey R. Law McPherson Julene L. Miller Topeka Legislature Wichita Hon. Robert E. Nugent By David E. Pierce Nancy A. Ogle Wichita Professor John C. Peck Lake Quivira Teresa M. Schreffler Lawrence Richard H. Seaton Sr. Manhattan Sarah B. Shattuck Ashland Richard D. Smith Topeka Items of Interest Regular Features Marty M. Snyder Topeka Matthew A. Spurgin Topeka 08 Actions and Consequences 06 President’s Message Catherine A. Walter Topeka Thinking Ethics: Coping with Young Lawyers Section News Issaku Yamaashi Overland Park 10 07 New Technology Rachael K. Pirner, BOG liaison Wichita 11 Law Students’ Corner 14 19 Honored by the Kansas Bar Association for Their Service to 12 Law Practice Management Richard D. Ralls, Chairperson the Profession Tips & Tricks [email protected] Beth Warrington, Communications Manager 20 Milestones for Members of the 13 Members in the News [email protected] Legal Community 13 Obituaries 22 Golf and Sporting Clays Results 44 Appellate Decisions 22 In Memoriam ... You’ll be Missed 45 Appellate Practice Reminders OUR MISSION 22 Special Thanks to the 2011 58 Classifieds Annual Meeting Planning Task Force, Supreme Court Education 59 CLE Docket The Kansas Bar Association is Committee, and Annual Meeting dedicated to advancing the pro- Sponsors fessionalism and legal skills of The Robert K. Weary Award lawyers, providing services to its 23 members, serving the commu- 53 Notice of Amendment of Local nity through advocacy of public Rules of Practice of the United policy issues, encouraging public States District Court understanding of the law, and promoting the effective admin- istration of our system of justice. www.ksbar.org The Journal of the Kansas Bar Association | July/August 2011 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS CON’T. Article ... serving the citizens of Kansas and the legal profession through funding chari- 24 table and educational projects that foster 2011 the welfare, honor, and integrity of the legal system by improving its accessibility, equality, and uniformity, and by enhanc- Legislative ing public opinion of the role of lawyers in our society. Kansas Law Center Update 1200 SW Harrison By Joseph N. Molina III Topeka, Kansas 66612-1806 Telephone: (785) 234-5696 Fax: (785) 234-3813 Website: www.ksbar.org OFFICERS Daniel H. Diepenbrock Liberal President [email protected] Joni J. Franklin Wichita President-elect [email protected] Cover layout & design by Ryan Purcell [email protected] Katherine L. Kirk Lawrence Secretary-Treasurer [email protected] James D. Oliver Overland Park Immediate Past President [email protected] BOARD OF TRUSTEES Glenn R. Braun Hays James C. Dodge Sublette Holly Dyer Wichita Gregory P. Goheen Kansas City, Kan. James L. Hargrove El Dorado Aaron L. Kite Dodge City Charles L. Lee Hutchinson Amy E. Morgan Overland Park David H. Moses Wichita Edward J. Nazar Wichita C. David Newbery Topeka Susan G. Saidian Wichita Todd N. Thompson Lawrence Kenneth W. Wasserman Salina Hon. Evelyn Z. Wilson Topeka Melissa R. Doeblin Topeka Young Lawyers Representative Margaret A. Farley Lawrence Kansas Association for Justice Representative Patrice Petersen-Klein Topeka Kansas Women Attorneys Association Representative William L. Townsley III Wichita Kansas Association of Defense Counsel Representative Laura L. Ice Wichita Kansas Bar Association Representative Bruce W. Kent Manhattan Kansas Bar Association Representative Timothy M. O’Brien Kansas City, Kan. Kansas Bar Association Representative EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR Jeffrey J. Alderman Topeka [email protected] MANAGER, PUBLIC SERVICES Kelsey Schrempp Topeka [email protected] www.ksbar.org The Journal of the Kansas Bar Association | July/August 2011 5 FROM THE PRESIDENT RACHAEL K. PIRNER Leaving Her Corner of the Forest “You can’t stay in your corner of the Forest waiting for others to The Association is launching a new and updated website come to you. You have to go to them sometimes.” this year. With that will come a software upgrade that will –Winnie the Pooh allow for list serves to be maintained by the Association for the benefit of our section members. The first section members his is one president that is leaving her corner of the that will be asked to subscribe will be Solo & Small Firm Sec- forest — or the plains, as the case may be — to see my tion and young lawyers. As we all know, there has been great friends and colleagues. My hope is that this year many growth of small and solo practitioners in this state and around Tof us will also venture out of our corners of the forest. One the country. The list serve will give our colleagues a forum to of my objectives, and thankfully one shared by our president- ask for advice about their business, “what has been your ex- elect, Lee Smithyman, and our vice president, Dennis Depew, perience with XYZ billing software,” or seek answers to ques- is to create opportunities for us to better communicate with tions in the course of practicing law and, most importantly, one another. We will facilitate communications between the our colleagues in Solo & Small Firm Section can begin to Board of Governors, the officers, and you. But we will also build relationships with one another that are not constrained create opportunities among the members, committees, and by geographic proximity. sections for networking and communication. We have great Lee, Dennis, and I are going on a listening tour this year, lawyers that comprise our Association. Our substantive sec- and if necessary, the next few years. We want to visit our mem- tions include the best practitioners in their respective areas of bers and colleagues around the state to talk to them about the law and each section contributes to our profession, mak- their practices, their needs and see how this organization can ing us all better lawyers. Our committees work to implement better serve those needs. At the time of this writing, we have our Mission, tirelessly. Now, it is time to get acquainted, re- meetings scheduled in Liberal, Colby, Dodge City, Hays, gardless of where we live or work. Washington, Topeka, Fredonia, Wichita, Johnson County, Last year, for the first time in a long while, the Associa- Marion, and Ottawa. We will be meeting with the Kansas tion facilitated a meeting among section presidents and com- Women Attorneys Association, the Kansas Association of De- mittee chairs. Wow, put a bunch of smart, passionate lawyers fense Counsel, and the Kansas Association for Justice. We are into a room and just sit back and watch the innovative ideas in the process of scheduling additional meetings with local about how to better serve membership fly. Collaboration and and specialty bars across the state. If you would like for one of networking among our colleagues was instantaneous, the by- us to visit your local bar, please call or email me at rpirner@ product will be new CLE opportunities and better service to ksbar.org.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Zinio Approved Devices
    Zinio Approved Devices For use via app: Zinio Apps are available for the following devices: PC, Mac, iPhone, iPad,Android, Kindle Fire and Blackberry Playbook. Note: Zinio apps are not available for the Nook Color or Tablet. Barnes and Noble does not allow the Zinio app to be downloaded from their app store. Zinio may be accessible through the Browser depending on the memory of your Nook. For use via web browser: User experience depends on: - Speed of wireless device - Processor speed - Memory space of the device being used Minimum Requirements: - 1GB internal memory - 1GHz processor - Android Honeycomb OS - Adobe Flash and ActiveX plug-in - High Speed 802.11b/g/n wireless - Color screen Recommended (meet all requirements and offer an optimal experience) Samsung Galaxy Tablet o Android Honeycomb OS o 1GB internal memory o High speed WiFi Blackberry Playbook Tablet o Blackberry OS o 1GHz processor o 1GB internal memory o High speed WiFi Le Pan II o Android 3.1 Honeycomb OS o 1GHz processor o 3GB internal memory o 802.11b/g/n wireless LAN Lenovo o Android 2.3 OS o 1GHz processor o 1GB internal memory o 802.11b/g/n wireless LAN HP Touch Pad o HP WebOS 3.0 o 1GHz processor o 1GB internal memory o 802.11b/g/n wireless LAN Sony Tablet S o Android Honeycomb o 1GB internal memory o 802.11b/g/n wireless LAN Asus Slider Tablet o Android 3.1 Honeycomb OS o 1Ghz processor o 1GB internal memory o High speed WiFi Pandigital Nova Digital Reader o Android 2.3 OS o 4GB internal memory o 802.11b/g/n wireless LAN Toshiba Thrive Tablet o Android Honeycomb
    [Show full text]
  • Správa O Meraní Aimmonitor December 2011
    Správa o meraní AIMmonitor December 2011 Internetová populácia v mesiaci december dosiahla počet 2 631 035 užívateľov. November 2011 December 2011 Veľkosť internetovej populácie SR 2 615 713 2 631 035 RUTOTAL(počet) (všetci návštevníci) 3 113 816 3 117 896 RUTOTAL(počet) (návštevníci zo SR) 2 406 455 2 420 552 PVTOTAL(počet) (od všetkých návštevníkov) 1 733 304 248 1 683 260 281 PVTOTAL(počet) (od návštevníkov zo SR) 1 544 330 445 1 501 661 372 Aktuálne hodnoty pre mobilné zariadenia sú: PVMOBIL(počet) (od všetkých návštevníkov) 92 043 317 PVMOBIL(počet) (od návštevníkov zo SR) 76 577 781 Prehľad pre všetky servery, ktoré boli zapojené do AIMmonitor spolu: Copyrights © 2012 MEDIARESEARCH,a.s., Gemius SA 1 Axxx Analýza ukazatelů slovenského internetu Copyrights © 2012 MEDIARESEARCH,a.s., Gemius SA 2 Axxx Analýza ukazatelů slovenského internetu Č. Zariadenie Zobrazenia # % 1 Nokia 21 105 415 24,4 Nokia E52 1 797 361 2,1 Nokia C5-03 1 322 556 1,5 Nokia C3 1 217 015 1,4 Nokia 5530 XpressMusic 1 074 867 1,2 Nokia C5 1 061 700 1,2 Ostatné 14 631 916 16,9 2 Sony Ericsson 18 023 079 20,8 Sony Ericsson E15i 3 636 009 4,2 Sony Ericsson J10i2 1 683 072 1,9 Sony Ericsson E10i 1 112 388 1,3 Sony Ericsson MT15i 784 782 0,9 Sony Ericsson U20i 758 125 0,9 Ostatné 10 048 703 11,6 3 Samsung 15 953 536 18,4 Samsung GT-S5830 2 045 761 2,4 Samsung GT-S5230 1 692 157 2 Samsung GT-S5620 1 615 778 1,9 Samsung GT-i9100 (Galaxy S II) 1 447 293 1,7 Samsung GT-i9000 (Galaxy S) 1 293 288 1,5 Ostatné 7 859 259 9,1 4 Apple 14 191 575 16,4 Apple iPhone 8 525 112 9,8
    [Show full text]
  • A Future Projection of Hardware, Software, and Market Trends of Tablet Computers
    A Future Projection of Hardware, Software, and Market Trends of Tablet computers Honors Project In fulfillment of the Requirements for The Esther G. Maynor Honors College University of North Carolina at Pembroke By Christopher R. Hudson Department of Mathematics and Computer Science April 15,2013 Name Date Honors CoUege Scholar Name Date Faculty Mentor Mark Nfalewicz,/h.D. / /" Date Dean/Esther G/Maynor Honors College Acknowledgments We are grateful to the University of North Carolina Pembroke Department of Computer Science for the support of this research. We are also grateful for assistance with editing by Jordan Smink. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract........................................................................................................................................... 1 Background..................................................................................................................................... 2 Materials and Methods.................................................................................................................... 3 Results……..................................................................................................................................... 5 Discussion...................................................................................................................................... 8 References..................................................................................................................................... 10 iii List of Tables Table 1 Page 7
    [Show full text]
  • Barnes & Noble NOOK User Guide
    Barnes & Noble, Inc. 122 Fifth Avenue, New York, NY 10011 USA. © 2010-2012 Barnes & Noble, Inc. All rights reserved. NOOK®, NOOK Color™, NOOK Tablet™, NOOK Book™, NOOK Bookstore™, NOOK Friends™, NOOK Kids™, NOOK Newsstand™, NOOK Store™, NOOK Study™, Read In Store™, More In Store™, Free Friday™, LendMe®, PubIt!™, Lifetime Library™, GlowLight™, Read What You Love. Anywhere You Like™, The Simple Touch Reader™, and Read Forever™ are trademarks of Barnes & Noble, Inc. Patent Pending. Screenshots and product images are simulated and for instructional purposes only. They may differ from the actual product and are subject to change without notice. Content shown may vary from actual available content, which may change without notice. Your use of NOOK is subject to the NOOK Terms of Service located in this User Guide and here: www.nook.com/legal. Contains Reader® Mobile technology by Adobe Systems Incorporated. All trademarks or registered trademarks that are not the property of Barnes & Noble or its affiliates are the property of their respective owners. Model BNRV350A Version: 1.1.1.A Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 7 Contact Us ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 7 Getting to Know Your NOOK .......................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • TECHNOLOGY TOOLS of Thetrade
    TECHNOLOGY TOOLS of theTRADE 600, delivering 169 pixels per SplashID inch. There are six font sizes. Password The entire Barnes & Noble cata- Manager log of books, newspapers, and Multiply your number of magazines is available via the connected devices times the built-in Wi-Fi (802.11 b/g/n). logins that require unique The 8GB of internal memory passwords, and you have what will hold up to 5,000 e-books, might be called your password and you can add up to 32GB headache index. One common, Samsung accessories include an HD web- with microSD™ memory card although risky, palliative is to Chromebook cam with a noise-cancelling for books and music. As a use the same password over The first Chrome-based note- microphone and a mini VGA tablet, the Nook has a selection and over. Another is to keep an books will be available from port. Battery life is 8.5 hours. of apps on everything from organized directory of strong Samsung and Acer this month. Like other Chromebooks, this is gaming to learning, while Web password logins someplace The Samsung Series 5 Chrome- essentially a Web-centered com- browsing runs video in a variety where you have easy access to books will feature the Chrome puter that boots up in about of formats with the Adobe® it as well as encrypted backup Web browser that has been eight seconds and has its apps Flash® player, and audio in- somewhere else in case you converted to an operating sys- and your information living cludes sites like Pandora.
    [Show full text]
  • Supreme Court W Cover
    No. 13-1314 In The Supreme Court Of The United States ARIZONA STATE LEGISLATURE, APPELLANT, v. ARIZONA INDEPENDENT REDISTRICTING COMMISSION, ET AL., RESPONDENTS. ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA AMICUS BRIEF OF THE STATES OF WASHINGTON, CALIFORNIA, COLORADO, CONNECTICUT, HAWAII, IDAHO, MASSACHUSETTS, MISSISSIPPI, NEW MEXICO, NEW YORK, OREGON, PENNSYLVANIA, AND VIRGINIA IN SUPPORT OF RESPONDENTS ROBERT W. FERGUSON Attorney General NOAH G. PURCELL Solicitor General REBECCA RIPOLI GLASGOW Deputy Solicitor General Counsel of Record JAY D. GECK Deputy Solicitor General 1125 Washington Street SE Olympia, WA 98504-0100 360-664-3027 [email protected] i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ....................................................... 1 INTEREST OF AMICI CURIAE ................................ 2 SUMMARY OF ARGUMENT .................................... 4 ARGUMENT ............................................................... 5 A. The States, As Sovereigns, Are Entitled To Structure Their Lawmaking Processes As They See Fit .................................. 5 B. The Elections Clause Does Not Disturb The States’ Sovereign Authority To Allocate Lawmaking Power To Entities Other Than The Legislature .............................. 8 C. The Arizona Legislature’s Argument Threatens States’ Diverse Redistricting Systems, Which Often And For Good Reason Place Significant Power Outside The Legislature ................................................ 10 1. Some States Give Their Courts Authority To Redistrict
    [Show full text]
  • Blaine's Name in Vain: State Constitutions, School Choice, and Charitable Choice
    Denver Law Review Volume 83 Issue 1 Article 4 December 2020 Blaine's Name in Vain: State Constitutions, School Choice, and Charitable Choice Jill Goldenziel Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.du.edu/dlr Recommended Citation Jill Goldenziel, Blaine's Name in Vain: State Constitutions, School Choice, and Charitable Choice, 83 Denv. U. L. Rev. 57 (2005). This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ DU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Denver Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ DU. For more information, please contact [email protected],[email protected]. BLAINE'S NAME IN VAIN?: STATE CONSTITUTIONS, SCHOOL CHOICE, AND CHARITABLE CHOICE JILL GOLDENZIELf ABSTRACT This article explores the growing controversy over "no-funding pro- visions, " state constitutionalprovisions that restrict statefunding of reli- gious institutions. These provisions, allegedly rooted in anti-Catholic bigotry, may threaten state implementation of school choice programs and faith-based initiatives involving public funding of religious social service organizations. This article argues that these no-funding provi- sions, which are commonly termed "Blaine Amendments," "Little Blaines," or "Baby Blaines," are often unrelated to the failed federal Blaine Amendment, and do not always share the federal amendment's infamous anti-Catholic history. In the first study of its type, this article surveys the language and history of constitutionalprovisions prohibiting funding of religious institutions in allfifty states, and details the constitu- tional history andjudicial interpretationof these provisions in eight rep- resentative states: Ohio, Wisconsin, Arizona, Florida, Colorado, Michi- gan, Vermont, and Maine. This article concludes that the fates of school vouchers andfaith-based initiatives will not rest on the so-called "Blaine Amendments," but on the ideological and jurisprudentialtendencies of state judiciaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 1 the Constitutional Framework of Ohio State Government
    Chapter 1 The Constitutional Framework of Ohio State Government Image courtesy of the Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board Advisory and Review Square Capitol the of courtesy Image Statehouse Map Room What is a Constitution? A constitution is the fundamental law of a state or nation. It is a written document agreed to by the people and thus derives its authority from those it governs. A constitution establishes the nature and character of the state or national government. It organizes government into various branches, prescribes their powers, and specifies the extent to which these powers may be exercised. The Ohio Constitution is the fundamental law of Ohio and is subject only to the restrictions of the United States Constitution, acts of Congress, and international treaties to which the United States is a party. It may be changed only by voter approval of proposed amendments. Like the United States Constitution, the Ohio Constitution organizes government into three separate branches: the legislative, the executive, and the judicial. Each branch is independent of the other two and has defined powers and responsibilities. All laws enacted by the legislative branch must comply with the Constitution’s provisions; those that do not are unenforceable. LSC A Guidebook for Ohio Legislators Page | 1 Chapter 1: The Constitutional Framework of the Ohio State Government Ohio’s first constitution was approved by Congress in 1802 as a first step to Ohio’s admission to the Union as a state. Ohio’s second constitution, the Constitution of 1851, as subsequently amended, is today’s fundamental law of Ohio. A constitution is the fundamental law of a state or nation.
    [Show full text]
  • Ohio's State Test High School American Government
    OHIO’S STATE TEST HIGH SCHOOL AMERICAN GOVERNMENT TEACHER’S GUIDE REVISED WITH UPDATED TEST ITEM SPECS AND SAMPLE TEST ITEMS - AUGUST 2018 COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS SOCIAL STUDIES DEPARTMENT www.ccsoh.us/socialstudies Ohio’s State Test: High School American Government Teacher’s Guide 1 Test Specifications: American Government Introduction The American Government Test Specifications provide an overview of the structure and content of the test. This overview includes a description of the test design as well as information on the types of items that will appear on the test. A test blueprint is included that identifies the range and distribution of items and points, grouped into various categories. The specifications also provide specific guidelines for the development of all items used for the American Government test. This document is intended to be a resource not only for item writers and test designers, but for Ohio educators and other stakeholders who are interested in a deeper understanding of the test. General Description of the American Government Test In 2010 Ohio adopted new rigorous academic content standards for American Government. A model curriculum based on these new standards was adopted in 2011. An achievement assessment that aligns to the new standards and model curriculum is mandated by Ohio Revised Code 3301.079. The assessment will be administered as a two-part test, in a computer-delivered format, to measure progress toward the standards and to provide information to teachers and administrators. Test Design The structure of the American Government Test will consist of two parts that will be given near the end of the year.
    [Show full text]
  • OCT 24 2066 MARCIA J Nl^Rqgft C Sllpreme T;(;T^Id? ^F TABLE of CONTENTS
    IN THE SUPREME COURT OF OHIO MELISSA ARBINO, Case No. 2006-1212 Petitioner, -vs- JOHNSON & JOHNSON, et al., Respondents. AMICUS BRIEF OF THE OHIO CHAPTER OF THE AMERCIAN BOARD OF TRIAL ADVOCATES IN SUPPORT OF CERTIFIED QUESTION NO. 1 Bemard K. Bauer, Esq. (0016290) Julie A. Callsen, Esq. (0062287) (COUNSEL OF RECORD) (COUNSEL OF RECORD) BERNARD K. BAUER CO., L.P.A. Benjamin C. Sasse, Esq. (0072856) 410 W. Sandusky Street TUCKER, ELLIS & WEST P.O. Box 932 1150 Huntington Building, 925 Eudid Avenue Findlay, OH 45839 Cleveland, OH 44115-1475 Telephone: (419) 423-2673 Telephone: (216) 696-3536 FAX: (419) 423-2127 FAX: (216) 592-5009 E-mail: bauertrial@turbosurf net COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENTS, COUNSEL FOR AMICUS CURIAE, JOHNSON & JOHNSON, JOHNSON & OHIO CHAPTER OF THE AMERICAN JOHNSON PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH BOARD OF TRIAL ADVOCATES AND DEVELOPMENT, LLC AND ORTHO- McNEIL PHARMACEUTICAL, INC. Janet G. Abaray, Esq. (0002943) (COUNSEL OF RECORD) Stephen P. Carney, Esq. (0063460) Melanie S Bailey, Esq. (0075821) (COUNSEL OF RECORD) Calvin 8, Tregre, Esq. (0073454) Douglas R. Cole, Esq. (0070665) BURG, SIMPSON, ELDREDGE, HERSH Holly J. Hunt, Esq. (0075069) & JARDINE, P.C. Sharon A. Jennings, Esq. (0055501) 312 Walnut Street, Suite 2090 James M. Petro, Esq. (0022096) Cincinnati, OH 45202 Frank M. Strigad, Esq. (0078377) Telephone: (513) 852-5600 OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FAX: (513) 852-5611 30 East Broad Street, 17th Floor Columbus, OH 43215 Robert S. Peck, Esq. Telephone: (614) 466-2872 Stephen B. Pershing, Esq. FAX: (614) 728-7592 CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION 1050 315'Street, NW COUNSEL FOR RESPONDENT, Washington, DC 20007-4499 STATE OF OHIO Telephone: (202) 944-2874 FAX: (202) 965-0920 ^^[^ciu/ COUNSEL FOR PETITIONER, MELISSA ABARINO OCT 24 2066 MARCIA J Nl^rqGFt C SllPREME t;(;t^id? ^F TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Statement of the Facts ..................................
    [Show full text]
  • History of the Executive Veto in the Ohio Constitution* Alonzo H
    The Ohio State University LAW JOURNAL VOLUME 2 MARCI, 1936 NUMBER 2 HISTORY OF THE EXECUTIVE VETO IN THE OHIO CONSTITUTION* ALONZO H. TuTTLEt The convention which met in 1787 to draft a federal con- stitution never seriously questioned the wisdom of providing for an executive veto and this in spite of the fact that only four of the states had at that time any such provision in their con- stitutions. Only two members, Franklin and Gorham seemed to have spoken against any veto power whatever, while a few, Wilson, Reed, Hamilton and Gouveneur Morris argued for an absolute veto power. The real difference of opinion, however, was between those who favored a qualified veto power in the President alone and those who favored joining with the Presi- dent a suitable number of the judiciary in the exercise of this power: Realizing that a veto power would be given, Wilson and Madison, probably the two ablest members of the conven- tion, led the fight for the joining of the judiciary and the execu- tive. Not satisfied with the indecisive vote of four states to three against their proposal, they brought the matter up again and again, and even after the matter had seemingly been settled for good, late in the proceedings of the convention Madison * The legal aspects of the "Executive Veto" will be treated in an article by Professor Tuttle to appear in a succeeding number of the OHiO STATE UNrVERSITY LAw JOURNAL. t Professor of Law, Ohio State University. 99 100 LAW JOURNAL - MARCH, 1936 proposed that all laws of Congress should be submitted to the President and the Supreme Court separately.
    [Show full text]
  • Tablet Display Technology Shoot-Out
    frontline technology Tablet Display Technology Shoot-Out Smartphones and tablets represent a new class of displays with requirements different from that of TVs and monitors. Here is where manufacturers are – and are not – meeting the challenges of ambient light and other considerations. by Raymond M. Soneira MARTPHONES AND TABLETS In addition to being mobile computers that Tablet Displays and Display Technologies Srepresent a major product revolution for con- produce high-resolution text and graphics, The line between smartphones and tablets has sumers, but these mobile devices have had an these devices are also mobile HDTVs and become increasingly blurred, which has given even greater impact on the display industry. photo viewers. They are expected to deliver rise to an intermediate category called Up until recently, most display technology excellent picture quality and color accuracy phablets. For this article, I am classifying any was dedicated to producing large AC-powered over a wide range of ambient lighting. Their mobile display with a 5.5 in. or greater screen TVs and computer monitors that are used onboard digital cameras and their frequent use diagonal as a tablet. I picked a representative almost exclusively indoors under controlled for photo sharing among family and friends set of high-end displays and display technolo- and often subdued ambient lighting. Laptops make picture quality and color accuracy much gies in this size class, with the additional are the original mobile displays, but they have more important than for HDTVs because the requirement that they had to be tested on a hefty batteries, often run on AC power, and viewers often know what the photo subject production class device (rather than as a are also typically used indoors under con- matter actually looks like, especially when the standalone display or prototype).
    [Show full text]