US EPA Region 8 Delegation Summary 40 CFR Part 60 - New Source Performance Standards

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

US EPA Region 8 Delegation Summary 40 CFR Part 60 - New Source Performance Standards US EPA Region 8 Delegation Summary 40 CFR Part 60 - New Source Performance Standards A - General Provisions Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe B - Adoption and Submittal of State Plans for Designated Facilities Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe D - Standards of Performance for Fossil-Fuel-Fired Steam Generators for Which Construction is Commenced After August 17, 1971. Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Da - Standards of Performance for Electric Utility Steam Generating Units for Which Construction is Commenced After September 18, 1978. Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Db - Standards of Performance for Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Dc - Standards of Performance for Small Industrial-Commercial-Institutional Steam Generating Units Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe E - Standards of Performance for Incinerators Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Ea - Standards of Performance for Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is Commenced After December 20, 1989 and on or Before September 20, 1994 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Eb - Standards of Performance for Large Municipal Waste Combustors for Which Construction is Commenced After September 20, 1994 or for Which Modification or Reconstruction is Commenced After June 19, 1996 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Ec - Standards of Performance for Hospital/Medical/Infectious Waste Incinerators for Which Construction is Commenced After June 20, 1996 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe F - Standards of Performance for Portland Cement Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe G - Standards of Performance for Nitric Acid Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe 4/20/2021 Part60 NSPS Delegation Region 8 Summary Report Page 1 of 8 US EPA Region 8 Delegation Summary 40 CFR Part 60 - New Source Performance Standards Ga - Standards of Performance for Nitric Acid Plants for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After October 14, 2011 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe H - Standards of Performance for Sulfuric Acid Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe I - Standards of Performance for Hot Mix Asphalt Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe J - Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Ja - Standards of Performance for Petroleum Refineries for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After May 14, 2007 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe K - Standards of Performance for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After June 11, 1973, and Prior to May 19, 1978 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Ka - Standards of Performance for Storage Vessels for Petroleum Liquids for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After May 18, 1978, and Prior to July 23, 1984 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Kb - Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage Vessels) for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After July 23, 1984 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe L - Standards of Performance for Secondary Lead Smelters Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe M - Standards of Performance for Secondary Brass and Bronze Production Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe N - Standards of Performance for Primary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Furnances for Which Construction is Commenced After June 11, 1973 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Na - Standards of Performance for Secondary Emissions from Basic Oxygen Process Steelmaking Facilities for Which Construction is Commenced After January 20, 1983 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe 4/20/2021 Part60 NSPS Delegation Region 8 Summary Report Page 2 of 8 US EPA Region 8 Delegation Summary 40 CFR Part 60 - New Source Performance Standards O - Standards of Performance for Sewage Treatment Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe P - Standards of Performance for Primary Copper Smelters Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Q - Standards of Performance for Primary Zinc Smelters Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe R - Standards of Performance for Primary Lead Smelters Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe S - Standards of Performance for Primary Aluminum Reduction Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe T - Standards of Performance for the Phospate Fertilizer Industry: Wet-Process Phosphoric Acid Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe U - Standards of Performance for the Phospate Fertilizer Industry: Superphosphoric Acid Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe V - Standards of Performance for the Phospate Fertilizer Industry: Diammonium Phosphate Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe W - Standards of Performance for the Phospate Fertilizer Industry: Triple Superphosphate Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe X - Standards of Performance for the Phospate Fertilizer Industry: Granular Triple Superphosphate Storage Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Y - Standards of Performance for Coal Preparation and Processing Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Z - Standards of Performance for Ferroalloy Production Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe AA - Standards of Performance for Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces Constructed After October 21, 1974 and On or Before August 17, 1983 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe Aaa - Standards of Performance for Steel Plants: Electric Arc Furnaces and Argon-Oxygen Decarburization Vessels Constructed After August 7, 1983 Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe 4/20/2021 Part60 NSPS Delegation Region 8 Summary Report Page 3 of 8 US EPA Region 8 Delegation Summary 40 CFR Part 60 - New Source Performance Standards BB - Standards of Performance for Kraft Pulp Mills Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe BBa - Standards of Performance for Kraft Pulp Mill Affected Sources for Which Construction, Reconstruction, or Modification Commenced After May 23, 2013. Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe CC - Standards of Performance for Glass Manufacturing Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe DD - Standards of Performance for Grain Elevators Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe EE - Standards of Performance for Surface Coating of Metal Furniture Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe GG - Standards of Performance for Stationary Gas Turbines Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe HH - Standards of Performance for Lime Manufacturing Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe KK - Standards of Performance for Lead-Acid Battery Manufacturing Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe LL - Standards of Performance for Metallic Mineral Processing Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe MM - Standards of Performance for Automobile and Lighty Duty Surface Coating Operations Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe NN - Standards of Performance for Phosphate Rock Plants Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe PP - Standards of Performance for Ammonium Sulfate Manufacture Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe QQ - Standards of Performance for the Graphic Arts Industry: Publication Rotogravure Printing Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe RR - Standards of Performance for Pressure Senstive and Label Surface Coating Operations Colorado Montana North Dakota South Dakota Utah Wyoming Southern Ute Tribe 4/20/2021 Part60 NSPS Delegation Region 8 Summary Report Page 4 of 8 US EPA Region 8 Delegation Summary 40 CFR Part 60 - New Source Performance Standards SS - Standards of Performance for Industrial Surface Coating: Large Appliances Colorado Montana
Recommended publications
  • Colorado History Chronology
    Colorado History Chronology 13,000 B.C. Big game hunters may have occupied area later known as Colorado. Evidence shows that they were here by at least 9200 B.C. A.D. 1 to 1299 A.D. Advent of great Prehistoric Cliff Dwelling Civilization in the Mesa Verde region. 1276 to 1299 A.D. A great drought and/or pressure from nomadic tribes forced the Cliff Dwellers to abandon their Mesa Verde homes. 1500 A.D. Ute Indians inhabit mountain areas of southern Rocky Mountains making these Native Americans the oldest continuous residents of Colorado. 1541 A.D. Coronado, famed Spanish explorer, may have crossed the southeastern corner of present Colorado on his return march to Mexico after vain hunt for the golden Seven Cities of Cibola. 1682 A.D. Explorer La Salle appropriates for France all of the area now known as Colorado east of the Rocky Mountains. 1765 A.D. Juan Maria Rivera leads Spanish expedition into San Juan and Sangre de Cristo Mountains in search of gold and silver. 1776 A.D. Friars Escalante and Dominguez seeking route from Santa Fe to California missions, traverse what is now western Colorado as far north as the White River in Rio Blanco County. 1803 A.D. Through the Louisiana Purchase, signed by President Thomas Jefferson, the United States acquires a vast area which included what is now most of eastern Colorado. While the United States lays claim to this vast territory, Native Americans have resided here for hundreds of years. 1806 A.D. Lieutenant Zebulon M. Pike and small party of U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • STATE APPORTIONMENT of CORPORATE INCOME (Formulas for Tax Year 2021 -- As of January 1, 2021)
    STATE APPORTIONMENT OF CORPORATE INCOME (Formulas for tax year 2021 -- as of January 1, 2021) ALABAMA * Double wtd Sales MONTANA * 3 Factor ALASKA* 3 Factor NEBRASKA Sales ARIZONA * Sales/Double wtd Sales NEVADA No State Income Tax ARKANSAS * Sales NEW HAMPSHIRE Double wtd Sales CALIFORNIA * Sales NEW JERSEY Sales COLORADO * Sales NEW MEXICO * 3 Factor/Sales CONNECTICUT Sales NEW YORK Sales DELAWARE Sales NORTH CAROLINA * Sales FLORIDA Double wtd Sales NORTH DAKOTA * 3 Factor/Sales GEORGIA Sales OHIO N/A (2) HAWAII * 3 Factor OKLAHOMA 3 Factor IDAHO * Double wtd Sales OREGON Sales ILLINOIS * Sales PENNSYLVANIA Sales INDIANA Sales RHODE ISLAND Sales IOWA Sales SOUTH CAROLINA Sales KANSAS * 3 Factor SOUTH DAKOTA No State Income Tax KENTUCKY * Sales TENNESSEE Triple wtd Sales LOUISIANA Sales TEXAS Sales MAINE * Sales UTAH Sales MARYLAND (3) 75.0% Sales, 12.5% Property VERMONT Double wtd Sales & Payroll VIRGINIA Double wtd Sales/Sales MASSACHUSETTS Sales/Double wtd Sales WASHINGTON No State Income Tax MICHIGAN Sales WEST VIRGINIA * Double wtd Sales MINNESOTA Sales WISCONSIN * Sales MISSISSIPPI Sales/Other (1) WYOMING No State Income Tax MISSOURI * Sales DIST. OF COLUMBIA Sales Source: Compiled by FTA from state sources. Notes: The formulas listed are for general manufacturing businesses. Some industries have a special formula different from the one shown. * State has adopted substantial portions of the UDITPA (Uniform Division of Income Tax Purposes Act). Slash (/) separating two formulas indicates taxpayer option or specified by state rules. 3 Factor = sales, property, and payroll equally weighted. Double wtd Sales = 3 factors with sales double-weighted Sales = single sales factor (1) Mississippi provides different apportionment formulas based on specific type of business.
    [Show full text]
  • Dipterous Predators of the Mosquito in Utah and Wyoming
    Great Basin Naturalist Volume 9 Number 1 – Number 2 Article 2 12-30-1948 Dipterous predators of the mosquito in Utah and Wyoming Fred C. Harmston United States Public Health Service Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn Recommended Citation Harmston, Fred C. (1948) "Dipterous predators of the mosquito in Utah and Wyoming," Great Basin Naturalist: Vol. 9 : No. 1 , Article 2. Available at: https://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/gbn/vol9/iss1/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Western North American Naturalist Publications at BYU ScholarsArchive. It has been accepted for inclusion in Great Basin Naturalist by an authorized editor of BYU ScholarsArchive. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. 1)ii'ti^:rous predators of the mosquito in utah and wyoming FRED C. HARMSTOX, S. A. Sanitarian (R) United States Public Healtli Service The brackish marshes bordering the Great Salt Lake are proUtic mosquito breeding areas ; they also are the habitat of predaceous tiies which find a plentiful source of food in the mosquito larvae and pupae that become stranded in shallow water and mud during the dry periods of late spring and early summer. Inspections conducted in this area during May and June of 1945 and 1946 afforded the writer several opportunities to observe five species of predaceous flies vvhich were preying on moscjuito larvae and pupae. The observations were made at a time when the marginal areas of the extensive marshland were rapidly drying out. resulting in a heavy concentration of larvae and pupae in the shallow water of nu- merous pools.
    [Show full text]
  • State Use Mandatory Contract Quick Reference Guide
    STATE USE MANDATORY CONTRACT QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE Business Services SW177 Document destruction The Meadows SW800 Temporary employment services Galt Foundation Food Service Products SW001 Disposable cups, bottled water South Central Industries SW097 Pasta Kiamichi Opportunities SW131 Condiments, spices, coffee kits Kiamichi Opportunities SW172 Dried beans Kiamichi Opportunities Garments SW803 Socks South Central Industries SW915 Undergarments South Central Industries SW916 Safety garments and vests, high visibility Apex, Inc. Healthcare Products SW015 Wipes, lip balm, toothbrush, bath, shampoo cap South Central Industries Baby diapers, bed pads, wipes McCalls Chapel School SW104 Disposable gloves South Central Industries SW801 Condoms Kiamichi Opportunities Janitorial Products SW001 Hand soap, hand sanitizer, dispensers NewView Oklahoma Mop heads and dust mop heads People First Toilet seat covers, trash bags South Central Industries SW064 Paper towels, bath tissue, facial tissue South Central Industries SW320 Deodorizers, urinal products South Central Industries Janitorial Services SW001 Cleaning, maid, janitorial services Varies by region Maintenance Products SW001 Survey flags South Central Industries SW910 Heat and air filters Center of Family Love Office Supplies SW001 Awards, plaques, and trophies Dale Rogers Training Center SW022* Binders Center of Family Love Pens, refills, markers, grease pencils, highlighters, dryboard Sunshine Industries erasers and wipes Audio cassette tapes, VHS tapes, jewel cases, CD covers, Work Activity
    [Show full text]
  • Wyoming: 2010 Population and Housing Unit Counts 2010 Census of Population and Housing
    Wyoming: 2010 Population and Housing Unit Counts 2010 Census of Population and Housing Issued June 2012 CPH-2-52 U.S. Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics Administration U.S. CENSUS BUREAU census.gov Wyoming: 2010 Issued June 2012 Population and Housing Unit Counts CPH-2-52 U.S. Department of Commerce Rebecca M. Blank, Acting Secretary Rebecca M. Blank, Deputy Secretary Economics and Statistics Administration Vacant, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Robert M. Groves, Director SUGGESTED CITATION U.S. Census Bureau, 2010 Census of Population and Housing, Population and Housing Unit Counts, CPH-2-52, Wyoming U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, 2012 ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS ADMINISTRATION Economics and Statistics Administration Vacant, Under Secretary for Economic Affairs U.S. CENSUS BUREAU Robert M. Groves, Director Thomas L. Mesenbourg, Deputy Director and Chief Operating Officer Nancy A. Potok, Associate Director for Demographic Programs Enrique J. Lamas, Chief, Population Division CONTENTS List of Statistical Tables . v How to Use This Census Report . I-1 Table Finding Guide . II-1 User Notes . III-1 Crosswalk of Urban Areas and Places: 2010 . IV-1 Statistical Tables . 1 Appendixes A Geographic Terms and Concepts . * B Definitions of Subject Characteristics . * C Data Collection and Processing Procedures . * D Questionnaire . * E Maps . E-1 F Operational Overview and Accuracy of the Data . * G Residence Rule and Residence Situations for the 2010 Census of the United States . * H Acknowledgments . * *Appendix may be found in the separate volume, CPH-2-A, Population and Housing Unit Counts, Selected Appendixes, in print and on the Internet at <www .census .gov /prod/cen2010/cph-2-a .pdf> .
    [Show full text]
  • Gang Project Brochure Pg 1 020712
    Salt Lake Area Gang Project A Multi-Jurisdictional Gang Intelligence, Suppression, & Diversion Unit Publications: The Project has several brochures available free of charge. These publications Participating Agencies: cover a variety of topics such as graffiti, gang State Agencies: colors, club drugs, and advice for parents. Local Agencies: Utah Dept. of Human Services-- Current gang-related crime statistics and Cottonwood Heights PD Div. of Juvenile Justice Services historical trends in gang violence are also Draper City PD Utah Dept. of Corrections-- available. Granite School District PD Law Enforcement Bureau METRO Midvale City PD Utah Dept. of Public Safety-- GANG State Bureau of Investigation Annual Gang Conference: The Project Murray City PD UNIT Salt Lake County SO provides an annual conference open to service Salt Lake County DA Federal Agencies: providers, law enforcement personnel, and the SHOCAP Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, community. This two-day event, held in the South Salt Lake City PD Firearms, and Explosives spring, covers a variety of topics from Street Taylorsville PD United States Attorney’s Office Survival to Gang Prevention Programs for Unified PD United States Marshals Service Schools. Goals and Objectives commands a squad of detectives. The The Salt Lake Area Gang Project was detectives duties include: established to identify, control, and prevent Suppression and street enforcement criminal gang activity in the jurisdictions Follow-up work on gang-related cases covered by the Project and to provide Collecting intelligence through contacts intelligence data and investigative assistance to with gang members law enforcement agencies. The Project also Assisting local agencies with on-going provides youth with information about viable investigations alternatives to gang membership and educates Answering law-enforcement inquiries In an emergency, please dial 911.
    [Show full text]
  • From Alabama to Wyoming: 50 Counts of Double Standards -- the Missing Entries in the US Report on Human Rights
    • News Service:038/99 AI INDEX: AMR 51/33/99 EMBARGOED FOR 0001 GMT THURSDAY 25 FEBRUARY From Alabama to Wyoming: 50 counts of double standards -- the missing entries in the US report on human rights On 25 February, the US State Department will publish its annual report on human rights, addressing the unjustified killing or ill-treatment of people by police and other security forces in some 190 countries -- similar incidents in New York, Illinois or California, however, will not be granted a mention “One could very well say that this year, like every other, there will be 50 entries missing from the State Department report: from Alabama to Wyoming,” Amnesty International said, deploring the USA’s hypocritical stance at not recognizing the extent to which human rights abuses are going unchecked in its own territory. “The US government has a selective approach to human rights -- using international human rights standards as a yardstick by which to judge other countries, but consistently failing to apply those same standards at home.” “Furthermore, US government policies often lead to human rights being sacrificed for political, economic and military interests, both in US territory and abroad,” the organization continued. “By providing weapons, security equipment and training to other countries, the USA is responsible for the same abuses it denounces in its State Department report.” According to Amnesty International, when it comes to human rights, the USA discriminates against countries and victims. “The US government often criticizes countries it considers hostile, while ignoring abuses committed by its allies or failing to take action that would run counter to US interests.
    [Show full text]
  • COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by the State Historical Society of Colorado VO L
    THE COLORADO MAGAZINE Published by The State Historical Society of Colorado VO L. V Denver, Colorado, August, 1928 No. 4 Early Years of the Telephone in Colorado By Howard T. Vaille* The telephone came into the world a sickly, puny babe, the strangest creature ever born; it had but a mouth and an ear, with an artery connecting them. The queer child came unheralded and no one but the father cared whether it lived or died. The world said, "It is a freak, let it die," but the fond parent looked far into the future and saw in the little creature the promise of a beneficent giant which should some day perform a great service to mankind. The infant sent its first cry across the dusty attic where it was born. That was lVIarch 10, 1876. Next its voice was heard over the two miles of road from Boston to Cambridge. But could it ever resound in the canyon-like streets and in the lofty build­ ings of a great city; or muster the strength to compass the vast prairies of the IV est and make itself heard at the Golden Gate? IV ould it be wary and forceful enough to elude the mighty and subtle electrical forces, its cousins, which were lying in wait to destroy the life of the young child? There were the lightning, the electrical currents generated by man and the mysterious cur­ rents of nature playing around it; there were the mighty vested telegraph interests, who, as the child grew, saw in it a foe.
    [Show full text]
  • State Abbreviations
    State Abbreviations Postal Abbreviations for States/Territories On July 1, 1963, the Post Office Department introduced the five-digit ZIP Code. At the time, 10/1963– 1831 1874 1943 6/1963 present most addressing equipment could accommodate only 23 characters (including spaces) in the Alabama Al. Ala. Ala. ALA AL Alaska -- Alaska Alaska ALSK AK bottom line of the address. To make room for Arizona -- Ariz. Ariz. ARIZ AZ the ZIP Code, state names needed to be Arkansas Ar. T. Ark. Ark. ARK AR abbreviated. The Department provided an initial California -- Cal. Calif. CALIF CA list of abbreviations in June 1963, but many had Colorado -- Colo. Colo. COL CO three or four letters, which was still too long. In Connecticut Ct. Conn. Conn. CONN CT Delaware De. Del. Del. DEL DE October 1963, the Department settled on the District of D. C. D. C. D. C. DC DC current two-letter abbreviations. Since that time, Columbia only one change has been made: in 1969, at the Florida Fl. T. Fla. Fla. FLA FL request of the Canadian postal administration, Georgia Ga. Ga. Ga. GA GA Hawaii -- -- Hawaii HAW HI the abbreviation for Nebraska, originally NB, Idaho -- Idaho Idaho IDA ID was changed to NE, to avoid confusion with Illinois Il. Ill. Ill. ILL IL New Brunswick in Canada. Indiana Ia. Ind. Ind. IND IN Iowa -- Iowa Iowa IOWA IA Kansas -- Kans. Kans. KANS KS A list of state abbreviations since 1831 is Kentucky Ky. Ky. Ky. KY KY provided at right. A more complete list of current Louisiana La. La.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of Utah's Utes
    Timponogos - Ute A BRIEF HISTORY OF UTAH’S UTES Deep Creek Mountains - Goshute ANCESTRAL UTE TERRITORY CURRENT UTE RESERVATIONS Ute tradition suggests that the Ute people were brought here from the south in a magic sack carried by Sinauf, a god who was half wolf and half man. Anthropologists argue that the Utes began using the northern Colorado Plateau between one and two thousand years ago. Historically, the Ute people lived in several family groups, or bands, and inhabited 225,000 square miles covering most of Utah, western Colorado, southern Wyoming, and northern Arizona and New Mexico. Each of these bands was independent, but the Ute people were bound by a common language, close trade relationships, intermarriage, temporary military alliances, and important social and religious events. The major event for the Utes was, and still is, the Bear Dance, an annual gathering to celebrate the coming of spring. The Ute people ranged over a wide but well-known area to engage in a sophisticated gather- ing and hunting economy. They gathered seeds, berries, and roots, and hunted deer, rabbits, birds, Monument Valley - Navajo squashes, and potatoes. and fish. Long before white settlers arrived in Utah, many of the Utes raised corn, beans, pumpkins, The introduction of the horse in the 1600s brought major changes to the Ute way of life, although some Ute bands used the horse more than others. The horse allowed the Utes to travel farther and more quickly, and the Utes began to adopt many aspects of Plains Indian culture, living in mobile teepees and hunting buffalo, elk, and deer over long distances.
    [Show full text]
  • The Salvage of the USS Oklahoma & the USS Utah
    SALVAGESALVAGE OFOF THETHE BATTLESHIPBATTLESHIP USSUSS OKLAHOMAOKLAHOMA FOLLOWINGFOLLOWING THETHE ATTACKATTACK ONON PEARLPEARL HARBORHARBOR 19421942--4646 The USS Oklahoma was our first battleship equipped with 14-inch rifle main battery Second unit of the Nevada Class, built at Camden, New Jersey in 1914-16. Commissioned in May 1916 The Oklahoma was 583 feet long with a maximum beam of 95 feet. She had a maximum displacement of 27,500 Tons. This shows gunnery training in 1917, during World War I USSUSS OklahomaOklahoma - -The Oklahoma was extensively modernized in 1927-29 to make her less vulnerable to air and torpedo attack -In July 1936, she was dispatched to Europe to evacuate US citizens during the Spanish Civil War AttackAttack onon PearlPearl HarborHarbor Japanese torpedo exploding against hull of the Oklahoma The Oklahoma’s berth provided the clearest approach path for Japanese torpedo bombers along battleship row ATTACKATTACK ONON BATTLESHIPBATTLESHIP ROWROW TheThe OklahomaOklahoma waswas hithit byby 99 torpedoestorpedoes becausebecause ofof herher positionposition oppositeopposite thethe innerinner harbor,harbor, whichwhich allowedallowed JapaneseJapanese bombersbombers aa clearclear approachapproach pathpath Each torpedo struck the Oklahoma’s port side at higher levels because the ship began listing soon after the first torpedo detonated. This plot was assembled by John F. DeVirgilio (1991). Capsized hull of the Oklahoma outboard of the battleship Maryland, which received almost no damage Damage Assessment: Aerial view of
    [Show full text]
  • List of Surrounding States *For Those Chapters That Are Made up of More Than One State We Will Submit Education to the States and Surround States of the Chapter
    List of Surrounding States *For those Chapters that are made up of more than one state we will submit education to the states and surround states of the Chapter. Hawaii accepts credit for education if approved in state in which class is being held Accepts credit for education if approved in state in which class is being held Virginia will accept Continuing Education hours without prior approval. All Qualifying Education must be approved by them. Offering In Will submit to Alaska Alabama Florida Georgia Mississippi South Carolina Texas Arkansas Kansas Louisiana Missouri Mississippi Oklahoma Tennessee Texas Arizona California Colorado New Mexico Nevada Utah California Arizona Nevada Oregon Colorado Arizona Kansas Nebraska New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Utah Wyoming Connecticut Massachusetts New Jersey New York Rhode Island District of Columbia Delaware Maryland Pennsylvania Virginia West Virginia Delaware District of Columbia Maryland New Jersey Pennsylvania Florida Alabama Georgia Georgia Alabama Florida North Carolina South Carolina Tennessee Hawaii Iowa Illinois Missouri Minnesota Nebraska South Dakota Wisconsin Idaho Montana Nevada Oregon Utah Washington Wyoming Illinois Illinois Indiana Kentucky Michigan Missouri Tennessee Wisconsin Indiana Illinois Kentucky Michigan Ohio Wisconsin Kansas Colorado Missouri Nebraska Oklahoma Kentucky Illinois Indiana Missouri Ohio Tennessee Virginia West Virginia Louisiana Arkansas Mississippi Texas Massachusetts Connecticut Maine New Hampshire New York Rhode Island Vermont Maryland Delaware District of Columbia
    [Show full text]