DOCSLIB.ORG

American Sphinx the Character of Thomas Jefferson 1St Edition Pdf Free Download

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
American Sphinx the Character of Thomas Jefferson 1St Edition Pdf Free Download AMERICAN SPHINX THE CHARACTER OF THOMAS JEFFERSON 1ST EDITION PDF, EPUB, EBOOK Joseph J Ellis | 9780679764410 | | | | | American Sphinx The Character of Thomas Jefferson 1st edition PDF Book If someone is looking for a Jefferson biography in a sub page book, then they shouldn't read this. He is the sole author of the Declaration of Independence and he heavily borrowed ideas and even language from other writers. Certainly Jefferson, despite recent focus on his slave-owning, retains a power to inspire Americans across partisan lines which only Washington and Lincoln and perhaps Martin Luther King can match, giving even minor shortcomings disproportionate weight. I've only read one other book about Jefferson but I've read several others about the founding fathers and I'm absolutely convinced that this is the best I'll ever read about Thomas Jefferson. American Sphinx is a marvel of scholarship, a delight to read, and an essential gloss on the Jeffersonian legacy. Sign in to Purchase Instantly. Enlarge cover. For the vision of each generation starting from scratch, liberated from the accumulated legacies of past debts, laws, institutionalized obligations and regulations, allowed Jefferson to conjure up his fondest dream, a world where the primal meaning of independence could flourish without any restrictions, where innocence had not yet been corrupted. If Ellis is so skeptical, then why is he so eager to embrace their methods? Ellis seems indeed to have done here. His portrayal so one-sided that one puts down the book longing for a more objective take. The Louisiana Purchase was an attempt to continue the growth of the country to the Pacific Ocean to provide a seemingly endless swath of land for the once-and-future farmers of America to till the land. United States Presidential election This is not hypocrisy, argues Ellis, this is "compartmentalization". Related Searches. She had publicized new evidence for this relationship in her biography, Thomas Jefferson: An Intimate History, by noting that Jefferson was always at Monticello during Hemings' conception times for her children, and she never conceived when he was not there. He preferred writing as a means of communication rather than personal encounters. Before taking up a direct source on Jefferson I turned to his greatest enemy, Alexander Hamilton, an historical figure I knew vaguely. His defining trait, arguably, was a reflexively Manichean worldview that painted him, and his allies, as innately good and those who opposed him as evildoers, whether King George and Tories or rivals in the House of Burgesses or George Washington and Alexander Hamilton those like John Adams, friends who often quarreled with Jefferson, found their status constantly shifting. Hamilton created America's government. It was Jefferson, and not Washington in his Farewell Address, who coined the term "entangling alliances. Trivia About American Sphinx He was a failure as a I'd give the book a 3 but I'd be rating the subject more than the author. Readers also enjoyed. Several years ago, I first encountered Ellis with Founding Brothers and found it a great look into the revolutionary generation. In his time on the national scene I can find two instances of where he contributed greatly to the founding of a fledgling new republic: the writing of the Declaration of Independence and the Louisiana Purchase. Perhaps I should have read Sphinx after reading a general Jefferson biography, but one of Ellis' usual strengths is making history accessible and enjoyable to those who aren't as well-read on the topic. I find myself a little disappointed by a lot of the reviews for this book. American Sphinx is a marvel of scholarship, a delight to read, and an essential gloss on the Jeffersonian legacy. Published April 7th by Vintage first published January 31st Carol L. Thoughts on God was his attempt to prove that he was a Christian when people doubted his faith. Jun 20, Nathan rated it did not like it Shelves: franklin-library , history. The result is a Jefferson that is at best, a self-deceiver, at worst, a craven hypocrite. Another solid book about one of our great characters in American History. Learn how to enable JavaScript on your browser. He skips Jefferson's early life, and while he addresses many of the major historical points, he skips Jefferson's time as Secretary of State to Washington, and his second term as president. The first, the psycho-babble described above. In those years, the foundations for the republican party were laid in firm opposition to the Federalists. His internal battles of ideology versus action is further evidenced in his claim that he wavered and backed off taking a firm public stand on abolition and kept slaves himself. American Sphinx The Character of Thomas Jefferson 1st edition Writer An Anchor Paperback OriginalAn intelligent, sophisticated cross-section of Irish short fiction, ideal for casual readers and classrooms alike, that showcases where Irish writers are now, as well as where they are headed. An Anchor Paperback OriginalAn intelligent, sophisticated cross- section of Irish short fiction, ideal for casual readers First Edition, Seventh Printing Book is a clean tight unmarked copy. These powers enabled him to bemoan slavery while owning slaves, deny ambition while pursuing high office, and defame contemporaries while protesting his innocence and friendship. Other editions. Foster said that there was a match between the Jefferson line and that of the Hemings' descendant, for which, with historical evidence, the simplest explanation was that Jefferson was the father of Eston, and likely Hemings' other children. North American Hi Ellis isn't trying to re-travel the well-traveled histories. He preferred writing as a means of communication rather than personal encounters. This from the guy who wrote the Declaration of Independence. This overturned the more than years' contention by the Jefferson family and historians that his nephews, the Carr s , were more likely fathers. I loved the title. The contradictions are there, to be sure. Later in life, it was shown he doctored some notes so as to not give the impression his fondness for France had created a blind spot. Ellis posits Jefferson as an inscrutable figure shielded from effective analysis by a contradictory philosophy as well as a reserved personality. Perhaps, Ellis suggests, posterity is unfair to Jefferson; for all his self-evident brilliance, he was only a man, and it's unfair to place him on a pedestal. We Jeffersonians are still out there. Among all his idealistic and very unrealistic ideas, he had a few good ones. Ellis doesn't focus solely on Jefferson's flaws, though, Which is not to say that Jefferson was wholly Ultimately though, whatever his glaring personal flaws, his words and ideas retain a powerful ability to inspire people. For a man who insisted that life on the public stage was not what he had in mind, Thomas Jefferson certainly spent a great deal of time in the spotlight-- and not only during his active political career. Bad news for you, Ellis. Thomas Jefferson. American Sphinx The Character of Thomas Jefferson 1st edition Reviews It is a slow read, well-reasearched and cited by one of our countries great historians. Sep 28, Peggy Parsons rated it really liked it Shelves: nonfiction , biographies. Trade Paperback. Seriously, I can't even read between the lines now. This from the guy who wrote the Declaration of Independence. Thomas Jefferson. The skipped sections I mention were rife with issues i. National Book Foundation. One can't help but wonder if Mr. Sphinx is n I have read and enjoyed two books by Joseph J. The author does a good job of separating fact from fandom. I'm glad I read both - gave me a more complete picture of the man. Jun 05, Jonfaith rated it liked it. If you're reading this, I'm sure that you are not going to find a better entryway into a key part of the American Psyche and the history of our land than this book. He is all things to all people. I suspected throughout that Ellis felt his own conclusion so strongly -- that Jefferson was a self-deceiver -- that he was arguing it with his every decision of inclusion or omission. It can become easy to lionize the revolutionary generation because of the distance in history, and I like that Ellis draws attention to this right along side talking about his achievements. Since this was a focused character assessment, it wasn't a true biography. Ellis is attempting to draw deep psychological conclusions from sources that are entirely public: letters that Jefferson wrote, often with the intention of their being published. More information about this seller Contact this seller 4. What had been the real goal of the Revolution? It is like a storm in the atmosphere. See details. During his tenure as secretary of state he felt he was a misfit. Indeed, reaction might be the key, for Ellis's portrait of Jefferson emphasizes the Man Joseph Ellis's American Sphinx expertly probes the life, beliefs and public image of Thomas Jefferson, the Third President, author of the Declaration of Independence and the intellectual motor of the American Revolution. Ellis, American Sphinx Ellis' biography of Thomas Jefferson's character is a more difficult task than one might imagine at first. I vowed to read a Jefferson bio so that I could learn more about the man and his beliefs and philosophies. Add links. Ellis was consistently patronizing and apologetic in his discussions about Thomas Jefferson's thoughts, ideas and actions. American Sphinx The Character of Thomas Jefferson 1st edition Read Online American Sphinx posits that Thomas Jefferson is not a hypocrite but such an ardent political idealist that he compartmentalized the aspects of himself that he psychologically could not deal with and so self deceived himself.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Thomas Jefferson and the Ideology of Democratic Schooling
    Thomas Jefferson and the Ideology of Democratic Schooling James Carpenter (Binghamton University) Abstract I challenge the traditional argument that Jefferson’s educational plans for Virginia were built on mod- ern democratic understandings. While containing some democratic features, especially for the founding decades, Jefferson’s concern was narrowly political, designed to ensure the survival of the new republic. The significance of this piece is to add to the more accurate portrayal of Jefferson’s impact on American institutions. Submit your own response to this article Submit online at democracyeducationjournal.org/home Read responses to this article online http://democracyeducationjournal.org/home/vol21/iss2/5 ew historical figures have undergone as much advocate of public education in the early United States” (p. 280). scrutiny in the last two decades as has Thomas Heslep (1969) has suggested that Jefferson provided “a general Jefferson. His relationship with Sally Hemings, his statement on education in republican, or democratic society” views on Native Americans, his expansionist ideology and his (p. 113), without distinguishing between the two. Others have opted suppressionF of individual liberties are just some of the areas of specifically to connect his ideas to being democratic. Williams Jefferson’s life and thinking that historians and others have reexam- (1967) argued that Jefferson’s impact on our schools is pronounced ined (Finkelman, 1995; Gordon- Reed, 1997; Kaplan, 1998). because “democracy and education are interdependent” and But his views on education have been unchallenged. While his therefore with “education being necessary to its [democracy’s] reputation as a founding father of the American republic has been success, a successful democracy must provide it” (p.
    [Show full text]
  • Narrative Section of a Successful Application
    Narrative Section of a Successful Application The attached document contains the grant narrative and selected portions of a previously funded grant application. It is not intended to serve as a model, but to give you a sense of how a successful application may be crafted. Every successful application is different, and each applicant is urged to prepare a proposal that reflects its unique project and aspirations. Prospective applicants should consult the Research Programs application guidelines at http://www.neh.gov/grants/research/scholarly-editions-and-translations-grants for instructions. Applicants are also strongly encouraged to consult with the NEH Division of Research Programs staff well before a grant deadline. Note: The attachment only contains the grant narrative and selected portions, not the entire funded application. In addition, certain portions may have been redacted to protect the privacy interests of an individual and/or to protect confidential commercial and financial information and/or to protect copyrighted materials. Project Title: The Papers of Thomas Jefferson Institution: Princeton University Project Director: Barbara Bowen Oberg Grant Program: Scholarly Editions and Translations 1100 Pennsylvania Ave., N.W., Rm. 318, Washington, D.C. 20506 P 202.606.8200 F 202.606.8204 E [email protected] www.neh.gov Statement of Significance and Impact of Project This project is preparing the authoritative edition of the correspondence and papers of Thomas Jefferson. Publication of the first volume of The Papers of Thomas Jefferson in 1950 kindled renewed interest in the nation’s documentary heritage and set new standards for the organization and presentation of historical documents. Its impact has been felt across the humanities, reaching not just scholars of American history, but undergraduate students, high school teachers, journalists, lawyers, and an interested, inquisitive American public.
    [Show full text]
  • Jefferson's Failed Anti-Slavery Priviso of 1784 and the Nascence of Free Soil Constitutionalism
    MERKEL_FINAL 4/3/2008 9:41:47 AM Jefferson’s Failed Anti-Slavery Proviso of 1784 and the Nascence of Free Soil Constitutionalism William G. Merkel∗ ABSTRACT Despite his severe racism and inextricable personal commit- ments to slavery, Thomas Jefferson made profoundly significant con- tributions to the rise of anti-slavery constitutionalism. This Article examines the narrowly defeated anti-slavery plank in the Territorial Governance Act drafted by Jefferson and ratified by Congress in 1784. The provision would have prohibited slavery in all new states carved out of the western territories ceded to the national government estab- lished under the Articles of Confederation. The Act set out the prin- ciple that new states would be admitted to the Union on equal terms with existing members, and provided the blueprint for the Republi- can Guarantee Clause and prohibitions against titles of nobility in the United States Constitution of 1788. The defeated anti-slavery plank inspired the anti-slavery proviso successfully passed into law with the Northwest Ordinance of 1787. Unlike that Ordinance’s famous anti- slavery clause, Jefferson’s defeated provision would have applied south as well as north of the Ohio River. ∗ Associate Professor of Law, Washburn University; D. Phil., University of Ox- ford, (History); J.D., Columbia University. Thanks to Sarah Barringer Gordon, Thomas Grey, and Larry Kramer for insightful comment and critique at the Yale/Stanford Junior Faculty Forum in June 2006. The paper benefited greatly from probing questions by members of the University of Kansas and Washburn Law facul- ties at faculty lunches. Colin Bonwick, Richard Carwardine, Michael Dorf, Daniel W.
    [Show full text]
  • Adams and Jefferson : Personal Politics in the Early Republic
    d ADAMS AND JEFFERSON: Personal Politics in the Early Republic John Connor The deterioration of the friendship between John Adams and Thomas Jefferson remains a controversial subject among his­ torians. The two men were once the best of friends, spending personal time with each other’s family, and enjoying a profes­ sional collaboration that would become famous—drafting the Declaration of Independence. Furthermore, they freely ac­ knowledged their mutual fondness. In 1784, Adams wrote that his colleague Thomas Jefferson was “an old friend with whom I have often had occasion to labor at many a knotty problem and in whose ability and steadiness I always found great cause to confide.”1 Jefferson wrote similar words of praise to his friend James Madison: “[Adams] is profound in his views, and accurate in his judgments. He is so amiable, that I pronounce you will love him if ever you become acquainted with him.”2 But despite this initial close friendship, by the 1790s Adams called Jefferson “weak, confused, uninformed, and ignorant.”3 At the same time, Jefferson called Adams actions as President “the most grotesque scene in the tragic­comedy of govern­ ment.”4 What led these two men who once worked so closely together to turn from close friends to bitter enemies in only ten years? How their friendship dissolved has been discussed by Stephen Kurtz, Stanley Elkins, and Eric McKitrick, who em­ 58 phasize certain events in the Adams Presidency as precise mo­ ments in which the two men parted ways.5 Noble Cunningham Jr., points to the passage of the Alien and Sedition Act and the creation of a Standing Army as the point at which the two men’s differences became irreconcilable.6 Recent scholarship by James Sharp argues that a dinner conversation held before Adams was even elected led to their disbanding.7 A second school of thought, led by Merrill Peterson, Dumas Malone, and John Ferling, links the divide not so much to a particular event but to the actions of a third party, often Alexander Hamilton.
    [Show full text]
  • Founding Fathers" in American History Dissertations
    EVOLVING OUR HEROES: AN ANALYSIS OF FOUNDERS AND "FOUNDING FATHERS" IN AMERICAN HISTORY DISSERTATIONS John M. Stawicki A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate College of Bowling Green State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2019 Committee: Andrew Schocket, Advisor Ruth Herndon Scott Martin © 2019 John Stawicki All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Andrew Schocket, Advisor This thesis studies scholarly memory of the American founders and “Founding Fathers” via inclusion in American dissertations. Using eighty-one semi-randomly and diversely selected founders as case subjects to examine and trace how individual, group, and collective founder interest evolved over time, this thesis uniquely analyzes 20th and 21st Century Revolutionary American scholarship on the founders by dividing it five distinct periods, with the most recent period coinciding with “founders chic.” Using data analysis and topic modeling, this thesis engages three primary historiographic questions: What founders are most prevalent in Revolutionary scholarship? Are social, cultural, and “from below” histories increasing? And if said histories are increasing, are the “New Founders,” individuals only recently considered vital to the era, posited by these histories outnumbering the Top Seven Founders (George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, John Adams, James Madison, Alexander Hamilton, Benjamin Franklin, and Thomas Paine) in founder scholarship? The thesis concludes that the Top Seven Founders have always dominated founder dissertation scholarship, that social, cultural, and “from below” histories are increasing, and that social categorical and “New Founder” histories are steadily increasing as Top Seven Founder studies are slowly decreasing, trends that may shift the Revolutionary America field away from the Top Seven Founders in future years, but is not yet significantly doing so.
    [Show full text]
  • Beyond Biography, Through Biography, Toward an Integrated History
    Beyond Biography, Through Biography, Toward an Integrated DavidHistory Waldstreicher Reviews in American History, Volume 37, Number 2, June 2009, pp. 161-167 (Review) Published by The Johns Hopkins University Press DOI: 10.1353/rah.0.0102 For additional information about this article http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/rah/summary/v037/37.2.waldstreicher.html Access Provided by Sam Houston State University at 07/16/10 5:26PM GMT BEYOND BIOGRAPHY, THROUGH BIOGRAPHY, TOWARD AN INTEGRATED HISTORY David Waldstreicher Annette Gordon-Reed. The Hemingses of Monticello: An American Family. New York: Norton, 2008. 800 pp. $35.00. To comprehend the nature and existence of Annette Gordon-Reed’s much- heralded, exquisitely crafted, triumphant history of Sally Hemings and her family, it helps to look back a decade, to a set of developments in public his- tory and scholarship that Gordon-Reed herself helped initiate. In Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American Controversy (1997), Gordon-Reed carefully evaluated the evidence for Jefferson’s paternity of some or all of Hemings’s children, beginning with that testimony first put into print publicly by James Thomas Callendar in 1802 and later confirmed in published interviews by Hemings’s descendants. She admitted the hearsay nature of the positive evidence and made her best case by undermining the other side’s arguments, showing that it amounted to far less than “proof” of Jefferson’s nonpaternity. The testimonies relied upon by Virginius Dabney, John C. Miller, Merrill Peterson, Douglass Adair, et al. derived from Jefferson’s family and partisan supporters. Indeed, nineteenth-century defenders of Jefferson had more reasons to dissemble or even destroy evidence, but their words had been taken at face value well into the twentieth century.
    [Show full text]
  • Jill Lepore “President Tom's Cabin,” September 22, 2008. Review of Gordon-Reed, the Hemingses of Monticello. Baldwin
    Jill Lepore “President Tom’s Cabin,” September 22, 2008. Review of Gordon-Reed, The Hemingses of Monticello. Baldwin, James. “Everybody’s Protest Novel,” in Notes on a Native Son. Boston, 1955. Blassingame, John W. “Using the Testimony of Ex-Slaves: Approaches and Problems,” Journal of Southern History 41 (1975): 473-92. Brown, William Wells. Clotel: Or, the President’s Daughter. London, 1853. ________. Narrative of William W. Brown: A Fugitive Slave. Boston, 1847. Burstein, Andrew. The Inner Jefferson: Portrait of a Grieving Optimist. Charlottesville, 1995. Dickens, Charles. American Notes. London, 1842. _______. Letters of Charles Dickens, edited by Madeline House, Graham Storey et al. Charlottesville, 2001. _______. Martin Chuzzlewit. London, 1844. Ellis, Joseph. American Sphinx: The Character of Thomas Jefferson. New York: Knopf, 1997. Farrison, William. William Wells Brown: Author and Reformer. Chicago, 1969. Gordon-Reed, Annette. Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings: An American Controversy. Charlottesville, 1997. Jefferson, Thomas. Notes on the State of Virginia. 1782. Jordan, Winthrop D. Review of Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings. William and Mary Quarterly, 55 (1998): 316-18. Lewis, Jan and Peter Onuf, eds. Sally Hemings and Thomas Jefferson: History, Memory and Civic Culture. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia, 1999. Moore, Thomas. Epistles, Odes, and Other Poems. London, 1806. Moss, Sidney P. and Carolyn Moss, “The Jefferson Miscegenation Legend in British Travel Books,” Journal of the Early Republic (1987): 253-274. Parton, James. “The Presidential Election of 1800,” Atlantic Monthly July 1873. Sekora, John. “Black Message/White Envelope: Genre, Authenticity, and Authority in the Antebellum Slave Narrative,” Callaloo (1987): 482-515. Stowe, Harriet Beecher.
    [Show full text]
  • Few Americans in the 1790S Would Have Predicted That the Subject Of
    AMERICAN NAVAL POLICY IN AN AGE OF ATLANTIC WARFARE: A CONSENSUS BROKEN AND REFORGED, 1783-1816 Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By Jeffrey J. Seiken, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2007 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor John Guilmartin, Jr., Advisor Professor Margaret Newell _______________________ Professor Mark Grimsley Advisor History Graduate Program ABSTRACT In the 1780s, there was broad agreement among American revolutionaries like Thomas Jefferson, James Madison, and Alexander Hamilton about the need for a strong national navy. This consensus, however, collapsed as a result of the partisan strife of the 1790s. The Federalist Party embraced the strategic rationale laid out by naval boosters in the previous decade, namely that only a powerful, seagoing battle fleet offered a viable means of defending the nation's vulnerable ports and harbors. Federalists also believed a navy was necessary to protect America's burgeoning trade with overseas markets. Republicans did not dispute the desirability of the Federalist goals, but they disagreed sharply with their political opponents about the wisdom of depending on a navy to achieve these ends. In place of a navy, the Republicans with Jefferson and Madison at the lead championed an altogether different prescription for national security and commercial growth: economic coercion. The Federalists won most of the legislative confrontations of the 1790s. But their very success contributed to the party's decisive defeat in the election of 1800 and the abandonment of their plans to create a strong blue water navy.
    [Show full text]
  • Yes, Jefferson Owned Slaves
    Yes, Jefferson Owned Slaves. When he inherited slaves upon the deaths of his father and father-in-law, it was illegal to free them. In 1769 Jefferson wrote the statute that when later enacted permitted the manumission of Virginia slaves. He later authored the law that prohibited the importation of new slaves into Virginia; and his 1776 draft Virginia constitution provided: “No person hereafter coming into this country shall be held within the same in slavery under any pretext whatever.”1 In his draft of the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson charged King George III had “waged cruel war against human nature itself, violating its most sacred rights of life and liberty in the persons of a distant people who never offended him, captivating & carrying them into slavery in another hemisphere or to incur miserable death in their transportation thither.”2 Sadly the language was deleted when South Carolina and Georgia threatened to walk out of the convention.3 Writing for a British abolitionist newspaper in 1843, former President John Quincy Adams praised Jefferson’s struggle against slavery, contending that his draft Declaration stood as “an unanswerable testimonial to posterity, that on the roll of American abolitionists, first and foremost after the name of George Washington, is that of Thomas Jefferson.4 More than a century later, Philip Foner, editor of The Complete Writings of Thomas Paine, argued that the frequent characterization of Paine as “the first American abolitionist” was inaccurate because of Jefferson’s 1769 effort to legalize
    [Show full text]
  • HIS 100: Introduction to Historical Methods: the World of Thomas Jefferson Fall 2010 Professor T. Slaughter Tuesday and Thursday
    HIS 100: Introduction to Historical Methods: The World of Thomas Jefferson Fall 2010 Professor T. Slaughter Tuesday and Thursday RR Library 456, 9:40-10:55. Office hours: Tuesday and Thursday 11-noon, and by appointment. 369B RR; 273-2799 [email protected] Thomas Jefferson is an ideal focus for discussions of the range of subjects that fascinated him, from gardening to food, wine, women, education, politics, philosophy, architecture, and plantation management. He provides an exquisite example of Enlightenment culture during the age of revolutions, and of a Founding Father who, as Secretary of State, Vice President, and President attempted to implement the revolutionary and constitutional principles on which the United States was founded. His private correspondence and public papers, his published writings and private musings, give access to Jefferson’s inner landscape as well as the world in which he lived. Through films, non-fiction and fiction, and primary source documents relating to case studies—The Declaration of Independence and its contrast to Thomas Paine’s Common Sense; the Burr Conspiracy; and Jefferson’s relationship with his slave Sally Hemings—we will explore historical research and interpretation, both our own and that of other historians. In particular, we will look at some of the ways that historical research can go wrong, and how historical writing is always a reflection of perspectives rather than of gathered facts, of interpretations rather than recovery, of creativity rather than objective engagement with sources. Your grades will be based on attendance; active, knowledgeable participation in class discussions; and three papers that you will re-write after the first drafts are returned to you.
    [Show full text]
  • Thomas Jefferson, Congress, and the Gunboat Debate, 1802
    IN SEARCH OF A MORE REPUBLICAN NAVAL DEFENSE: THOMAS JEFFERSON, CONGRESS, AND THE GUNBOAT DEBATE, 1802-1810 A Thesis Presented to The Faculty and Department of History Liberty University In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in History By Ethan Zook December, 2019 1 Acknowledgements I was introduced to Thomas Jefferson in 2003, the two hundredth anniversary of the Lewis and Clark expedition. I was a member of a high school group which traced the route of the Corps of Discovery across the United States; we read Jefferson’s papers and considered themes like empire building and republicanism. That summer was my first encounter with his thought, and I was hooked. I’m grateful to Myron Blosser and Elwood Yoder, my high school teachers from Eastern Mennonite High School, who started my quest to better understand Jefferson. I’m also thankful for the assistance of scholars who graciously provided materials and suggestions. Craig L. Symonds, author of Navalists and Antinavalists, kindly (and completely unexpectedly) responded to my “out of the blue” email with encouragement and suggestions. Gene A. Smith assisted my search for a copy of his book For the Purposes of Defense. Christopher R. Sabick, Archaeological Director at the Lake Champlain Maritime Museum, provided a copy of Eric Emery’s archeological survey of the gunboat USS Allen. I’m especially grateful to my thesis advisors Troy L. Kickler and Carey M. Roberts who guided me through the research and writing process with extraordinary patience, and to David J. White who provided thoughtful suggestions for the later drafts.
    [Show full text]
  • Constrained to Silence Thoughts on Thomas Jefferson's Private Life Peg Downes
    Constrained to Silence Thoughts on Thomas Jefferson’s Private Life Peg Downes MLA – 500 The Human Condition Freedom and Enslavement By Ellen A. Brown 3001 Holly Hill Road Hendersonville, NC 28792 Constrained to Silence: Thoughts on Thomas Jefferson’s Private Life By Ellen A. Brown The first assignment for this class (MLA 500 – The Human Experience) called for writing a paper on the subject of freedom and slavery. My immediate response was to start thinking about Thomas Jefferson. As the author of the Declaration of Independence, Jefferson’s name is always associated with the ideas of liberty and freedom. On the other hand, slavery was not abolished by Jefferson and the other founding fathers, many of whom owned slaves. Daunting as it is to try to do research into the life, attitudes and behavior of one of the most revered and popular Americans who ever lived, I have boldly persevered. I hope to extract something from the wisdom of many historians and biographers and offer here a fresh glimpse into Jefferson’s complex personality. Scholarship on Thomas Jefferson in recent years has become less worshipful and more balanced. This trend is welcome, especially considering the unresolved controversies that have always swirled around his private life. Without wishing to detract in any way from the long list of his virtues and accomplishments, there is some value in taking a close look at those aspects of his life about which he kept silent. The silence he maintained formed a protective wall around him that effectively guarded his secrets. The same wall, however, kept him isolated and emotionally insulated.
    [Show full text]