The Ethics of Mourning: the Role of Material Culture and Public Politics in the 'Book of the Duchess' and the 'Pearl' Poem
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 2015 THE ETHICS OF MOURNING: THE ROLE OF MATERIAL CULTURE AND PUBLIC POLITICS IN THE 'BOOK OF THE DUCHESS' AND THE 'PEARL' POEM Tarren Andrews University of Montana - Missoula Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Part of the Cultural History Commons, Literature in English, British Isles Commons, Medieval History Commons, Medieval Studies Commons, and the Other English Language and Literature Commons Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Andrews, Tarren, "THE ETHICS OF MOURNING: THE ROLE OF MATERIAL CULTURE AND PUBLIC POLITICS IN THE 'BOOK OF THE DUCHESS' AND THE 'PEARL' POEM" (2015). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 4487. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/4487 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. THE ETHICS OF MOURNING: THE ROLE OF MATERIAL CULTURE AND PUBLIC POLITICS IN THE BOOK OF THE DUCHESS AND THE PEARL POEM By TARREN LEE ANDREWS Bachelor of Arts in English Literature, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, 2013 Thesis presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in English Literature The University of Montana Missoula, MT May 2015 Approved by: Sandy Ross, Dean of The Graduate School Graduate School Dr. Ashby Kinch, Chair Department of English Dr. John Hunt Department of English Dr. Paul Dietrich Department of Liberal Studies © COPYRIGHT by Tarren Lee Andrews 2015 All Rights Reserved ii ABSTRACT Andrews, Tarren, M.A., Spring 2015 English Literature The Ethics of Mourning: The Role of Material Culture and Public Politics in the Book of the Duchess and the Pearl Poem Chairperson: Dr. Ashby Kinch This project is a socio-historic analysis of two late 14 th century dream visions: Chaucer’s Book of the Duchess and the Pearl poem. Utilizing Robert Pogue Harrison’s concept of objectifying grief through ritualized communal mourning, this thesis examines the ways in which mourning literature functioned as consolatory device, and a form of public performance for the powerful patrons who commissioned the pieces. By engaging with pre-existing communities of grief, material culture, and courtly discourse these poems perform the work of mourning while simultaneously enacting modes of public performativity that stress the ethics of grieving, and suggest that, for royal patrons, it is imperative for the stability of the commonwealth that they respond appropriately to loss. In performing the work of mourning the texts advocate for a unity between public and private selves, enacting the principle that for a great leader the private is always public. iii Table of Contents Abstract .......................................................................................................................................... iii Introduction: The Role of Mourning Literature and Material Culture in the Objectification of Grief .....................................................................1 Images ............................................................................................................................................19 Chapter 1: Grief and John of Gaunt’s Courtly Persona in The Book of the Duchess ....................23 Chapter 2: Richard II’s Theology, Kingship, and Political Persona in the Pearl Poem ................47 Conclusion: Grief, Patronage, and the Performance of Public Identity .........................................79 Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................81 iv Introduction The Role of Mourning Literature and Material Culture in the Objectification of Grief Many people think that grief is privatizing, that it returns us to a solitary situation and is, in that sense, depoliticizing. But I think it furnishes a sense of political community of a complex order, and it does this first of all by bringing to the fore the relational ties that have implications for theorizing fundamental dependence and ethical responsibility. -Judith Butler, Precarious Life Our post-(post-)modern relationship with death, particularly our tendency to relegate it to hospitals—removing the dead and dying person from the home, the space of the living— has divorced us from our ancestors’ ritualized practices of grief and mourning, and recast loss as an individual burden with specific temporal restraints in lieu of an ongoing communal responsibility. In ancient times, common funerary and mourning practices created a community of bereavement, that prevented loss from becoming an isolating circumstance and strengthened social bonds between members both during and after loss. Robert Pogue Harrison suggests that, as an antidote to our failing cultural response to death, ritualized communal mourning behaviors serve to “contain the crisis of grief in the very act of objectifying its content through scripted gestures and precise codes of enactment,” thus insulating the bereaved from the psychological threats of grief: “conniption, catalepsy, or psychic dissolution.” 1 Within the pages of ancient tragedies we find vestiges of these ritualized behaviors—the orchestrated and “barbarous howls and shrieks of primal lamentation” which signified a death within the community. 2 While they seem to be wild and unconstrained, these scripted processes served to “ depersonalize the condition of grief by submitting it to a set of public, traditionally transmitted codes.” 3 In other words, Harrison defines “objectification” as the process of mitigating the “desire to die with the 1 Robert Pogue Harrison, The Dominion of the Dead (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2003), 56-57. Emphasis my own. 2 Ibid, 55. 3 Ibid, 55-60. Emphasis original. 1 dead” which “runs as deep in human nature as both love and the death drive, whose impulses it commingles and combines,” thus containing grief through ritualized and formalized public spectacle.4 Sigmund Freud, the ‘father of psychoanalysis,’ pioneered investigations into the death drive and argued that cultural mores develop to redirect this drive through other psychological mechanisms and desires. He remains the preeminent theorist for studies in grief and mourning on the individual level since his methods and theories provide a specific lens to examine a person’s psychological reaction to loss, but Harrison’s emphasis on Heideggerian theories of human social interaction abstracts Freud’s notions of individual mourning and melancholia by applying similar theories to communal responses to loss. In The Dominion of the Dead , Harrison traces the transformations of these social interactions from antiquity to modernity, examining the ways in which communal responses to death have changed over time. Harrison’s anthropological-socio- historic study of the history of relationships between the living and the dead opens up new avenues for examining the public performance of grief and communal funerary rituals in the Middle Ages. 5 Over the centuries the highly vocal and intensely physical rituals of antiquity were tamed and muted by Christianity. As Purgatorial discourse rooted itself in Christian doctrine during the latter half of the twelfth-century, the emphasis of funerary ritual shifted from comforting the bereaved to praying for the soul’s expedient journey through Purgatory and on to Heaven. 6 The doctrine of eternal souls made ostentatious spectacles of grief increasingly taboo and, in the monastic halls of the Middle Ages, death and subsequent mourning rituals were re-imagined. In 4 Ibid, 55. 5 For a psychoanalytic investigation of mourning in Chaucer’s works see L.O. Aranya Fradenburg, Sacrifice Your Love: Psychoanalysis, Historicism, Chaucer (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2002). See David Aers “The Self Mourning: Reflections on Pearl ,” Speculum 68.1 (1993): 54-73 for a psychoanalytic discussion of the Pearl poem. 6 John Bossy, “The Mass as a Social Institution: 1200-1700,” Past & Present 100 (1983), 29-32. 2 an effort to conform to changing Christian culture and customs, people began to create tangible, artistic, and textual representations of death—artifacts that I will call the material culture of death and mourning—that served to engage the living in the project of meditating on death and praying for the souls of the departed. This transition of mourning practices from vocalized public displays of grief to textual meditation on the process of dying ultimately rooted itself in the material culture—tombs, texts, paintings, etc.— of the later Middle Ages. Ashby Kinch claims, “[b]y providing concrete forms in which to contemplate death, verbal and visual artists served as privileged mediators of this decisive event, offering aesthetic forms in which readers and viewers could manage their anxiety.” 7 Monastic fraternities’ “Signs of Death,” collected poems which “describe the signs that the body produces as it approaches death,” attempted to work through the process of dying and functioned as guides for the living on how to both attend a death and how to die themselves. 8 The moment of death became a fixation for the