DOCSLIB.ORG

Olympic Legacy SPG Infrastructure Delivery Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Olympic Legacy SPG Infrastructure Delivery Study Olympics Legacy Supplementary Planning Guidance: Infrastructure Delivery Study Final Report Prepared for: Greater London Authority Prepared by: URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited and Savills Commercial Ltd 46407008 GLA OLSPG January 2012 Greater London Authority OLSPG Infrastructure Delivery Study Project Title: Olympic Legacy Supplementary Planning Guidance Infrastructure Delivery Study Report Title: Final Report Project No: 46407008 Report Ref: Status: Final Report Client Contact Name: Martin Scholar and Hermine Sanson Client Company Name: Greater London Authority Issued By: URS 6 - 8 Greencoat Place Victoria London SW1P 1PL Document Production / Approval Record Issue No: 5 Name Date Position Prepared by Lucy Farrow 18 th January 2012 Consultant (URS) Gregory Openshaw 18 th January 2012 Senior Consultant (URS) Oliver Fursdon 4th January 2012 Associate (Savills) Checked by Rory Brooke 20 th January 2012 Head of Economics and Development Team (URS) Approved by Rory Brooke 20 th January 2012 Document Revision Record Issue No Date Details of Revisions 1 19th October 2011 Original issue 2 31 st October 2011 Second draft 3 23rd December 2011 Third draft 4 9th January 2012 Fourth draft 5 20 th January 2012 Final Report Greater London Authority OLSPG Infrastructure Delivery Study LIMITATION URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (URS) has prepared this Report for the sole use of the Greater London Authority in accordance with the Agreement under which our services were performed. No other warranty, expressed or implied, is made as to the professional advice included in this Report or any other services provided by us. This Report may not be relied upon by any other party without the prior and express written agreement of URS. Unless otherwise stated in this Report, the assessments made assume that the sites and facilities will continue to be used for their current purpose without significant change. The conclusions and recommendations contained in this Report are based upon information provided by others and upon the assumption that all relevant information has been provided by those parties from whom it has been requested. Information obtained from third parties has not been independently verified by URS, unless otherwise stated in the Report. COPYRIGHT © This Report is the copyright of URS Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. Any unauthorised reproduction or usage by any person other than the addressee is strictly prohibited. Greater London Authority OLSPG Infrastructure Delivery Study CONTENTS Section Page No GLOSSARY.................................................................................................................................... I 1. INTRODUCTION.............................................................................................................. 3 Context to the Study ...................................................................................................................... 3 Aims of the Study .......................................................................................................................... 4 Approach ....................................................................................................................................... 4 Report Structure ............................................................................................................................ 5 2. SCALE OF ANTICIPATED GROWTH ............................................................................ 7 Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 7 Accommodation Schedules ........................................................................................................... 7 Resident Population .................................................................................................................... 10 Child Yield.................................................................................................................................... 11 Commercial Floorspace............................................................................................................... 13 3. SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE ....................................................................................... 14 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 14 Education: Early Years/Nursery .................................................................................................. 17 Education: Primary Education ..................................................................................................... 21 Education: Secondary Education ................................................................................................ 26 Health Care.................................................................................................................................. 30 Sports and Leisure ...................................................................................................................... 35 Open Space................................................................................................................................. 38 Play Space................................................................................................................................... 43 Libraries and Community Facilities.............................................................................................. 47 4. TRANSPORT ................................................................................................................. 51 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 51 Directly Enabling Schemes.......................................................................................................... 52 Supporting Schemes ................................................................................................................... 56 5. UTILITIES ...................................................................................................................... 58 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 58 Electricity ..................................................................................................................................... 59 Gas .............................................................................................................................................. 61 Water ........................................................................................................................................... 63 Sewerage..................................................................................................................................... 66 Waste Management .................................................................................................................... 68 Flood Defence ............................................................................................................................. 70 Greater London Authority OLSPG Infrastructure Delivery Study CONTENTS Section Page No 6. VIABILITY ASSESSMENT ............................................................................................ 75 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 75 Approach ..................................................................................................................................... 75 Market Overview.......................................................................................................................... 76 OLSPG Quantum and Location of Development ........................................................................ 81 Analysis of Approximate Land Value Bands By Land Use and Area.......................................... 82 Current Viability ........................................................................................................................... 83 Conclusion ................................................................................................................................... 85 7. SUMMARY OF INFRASTRUCTURE COSTS AND FUNDING .................................... 87 Introduction .................................................................................................................................. 87 Summary ..................................................................................................................................... 90 Social Infrastucture Interventions ................................................................................................ 90 Summary of Transport Interventions ........................................................................................... 91 Summary of Utilities Interventions............................................................................................... 92 Funding........................................................................................................................................ 94 Delivery...................................................................................................................................... 100 Timing and Prioritising of Delivery............................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Lea Valley Walk
    THE LEA VALLEY WALK LEAGRAVE TO THE HEART OF LONDON by Leigh Hatts JUNIPER HOUSE, MURLEY MOSS, OXENHOLME ROAD, KENDAL, CUMBRIA LA9 7RL www.cicerone.co.uk 774 Lea Valley text 2020 3rd Ed Rpt.indd 3 28/09/2020 14:52 © Leigh Hatts 2015 Third edition 2015 ISBN 978 1 85284 774 6 Reprinted 2020 (with updates) Second edition 2007 First edition 2001 Printed in Singapore by KHL using responsibly sourced paper. A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. All photographs are by the author unless otherwise stated. This product includes mapping data licensed from Ordnance Survey® with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. © Crown copyright 2015. All rights reserved. Licence number PU100012932. Updates to this Guide While every effort is made by our authors to ensure the accuracy of guidebooks as they go to print, changes can occur during the lifetime of an edition. Any updates that we know of for this guide will be on the Cicerone website (www.cicerone.co.uk/774/updates), so please check before planning your trip. We also advise that you check information about such things as transport, accommodation and shops locally. Even rights of way can be altered over time. We are always grateful for information about any discrepancies between a guidebook and the facts on the ground, sent by email to [email protected] or by post to Cicerone, Juniper House, Murley Moss, Oxenholme Road, Kendal, LA9 7RL. Register your book: To sign up to receive free updates, special offers and GPX files where available, register your book at www.cicerone.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Pool Street West: Statement of Community Involvement
    CHAPTER 06 APPENDICES UCL EAST PHASE 1 | POOL STREET WEST AT QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK CHAPTER 6 APPENDICES A. Publicity & Communications 104 B. Exhibition Materials 108 C. Workshop Materials 123 103 UCL EAST PHASE 1 | POOL STREET WEST Chapter 6 | Appendices STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT A. Publicity & Communications A. Publicity & Communications A1. Flyer advertising Stage 1 public exhibitions UCL EAST AT QUEEN ELIZABETH OLYMPIC PARK UCL EAST PHASE 1 | POOL STREET WEST CONCEPT DESIGN ROAD SHOWS DATES AND LOCATIONS Following consultation on the UCL East masterplan, the STRATFORD QUEEN ELIZABETH UCL East team is now presenting the concept designs BROADWAY OLYMPIC PARK for Pool Street West. Pool Street West makes up part Friday 19th May Saturday 20th May of the frst phase of UCL East and will feature student 11am - 2pm 11am - 2pm accommodation, academic, retail, community and engagement uses for UCL students and staff and the In the public space Waterworks Place public. Please join us at the road shows to see the initial adjacent to St John’s Adjacent to the ideas, meet the project team and share your feedback. on Stratford Broadway play fountain WESTFIELD ROAD CARPENTERS ROAD WESTFIELD STRATFORD CITY GREAT EASTERN ROAD WATERWORKS THE GROVE STRATFORD PLACE LONDON STATION LONDON AQUATICS STRATFORD AQUATICS CENTRE CENTRE BROADWAY LONDON STADIUM STRATFORD ST JOHN’S POOL STREET EAST SHOPPING CENTRE LONDON STADIUM POOL STREET WEST THORNTON STREET MONTFICHET ROAD STRATFORD BROADWAY MARSHGATE WARTON ROAD WEST HAM LANE CHANT STREET SIDINGS STREET For more information on UCL East please visit ucl.ac.uk/ucl-east To get in touch please contact Soundings at: For more information on the Cultural and Education District | [email protected] | 02077291705 please visit queenelizabetholympicpark.co.uk/ced A2.
    [Show full text]
  • Art in the Park a FIELD GUIDE a Field Guide to Art in the Park 2 3 USING THIS GUIDE
    1 ART IN THE PARK A FIELD GUIDE A FIELD GUIDE TO ART IN THE paRK 2 3 USING THIS GUIDE Queen Elizabeth Olympic This book is a field guide to the 26 permanent artworks in the Park. There’s a map at the back and Park was the first Olympic each artwork has a number to help you locate them. Going to find the artworks is just as important as all Park to integrate artworks the reading and looking you can do here. into the landscape right from These artworks have been made to be experienced the start. We worked with in the landscape – up close and from afar. Touch them, sit inside them, run across them, walk beneath established and emerging them. Gaze up, make games, take photographs, put artists, international and local, yourself in their shadow. to create an ambitious, diverse art programme that reflects the Park’s identity as a place for people from around the world and around the corner. Some of these artworks are large and striking, while others are smaller and harder to find. All of them were created specifically for this Park by contemporary artists who worked closely with the architects, designers and construction teams to develop and install their works. Their inspirations are varied: the undulating landscape, buried histories, community memories, song titles, flowing water, energy, ideas of shelter and discovery. Yet all of them are rooted here, each of them sparking new conversations with their immediate environment and this richly textured part of east London. “The trees mark time, the rings 2 3trace landscapes and lives that HistORY TREES have gone before.” Ackroyd and Harvey Ackroyd and Harvey British artists Ackroyd and Harvey created a series of living artworks to mark the main entrances of the Park.
    [Show full text]
  • Waterways Framework Olympic Legacy Waterways Framework Foreword 3
    OLYMPIC LEGACY WATERWAYS FRAMEWORK OLYMPIC LEGACY WATERWAYS FRAMEWORK FOREWORD 3 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park straddles a previously hidden and derelict network of waterways known as the Bow Back Rivers. Shaped and adapted for over 1,000 years, these 6km of canals and rivers are finally re-connected to England and Wales’ 2,000 mile inland waterways network owned by the Canal & River Trust. They now lie at the heart of one of the biggest regeneration projects in Europe. Across the country waterways are playing a vital role in revitalising our cities in an attractive and sustainable way. The restoration and transformation of the Bow Back Rivers through London’s Olympic plans and through the construction of Three Mills Lock has created a living legacy for London’s people and wildlife, and will form the backbone for a world class water city. The Olympic Legacy Waterways Framework developed by the London Legacy Development Corporation in partnership with the Canal & River Trust looks at how the rivers’ potential can be unlocked so that they are not just a visual backdrop to the surrounding developments, but a leisure and commercial resource in their own right. This strategy expands beyond the 6km within the Park to encompass the River Lee Navigation from Three Mills Island to Hackney Marshes and the lower end of the Hertford Union Canal – a length of 11km in total. TONY HALES QUOTE Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse aliquam, arcu quis vestibulum facilisis. BORIS JOHNSON QUOTE Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Suspendisse aliquam, arcu quis vestibulum facilisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Item 9
    Agenda Item 9 Subject: Local Plan Consultation Document Report No: Appendices to Agenda Item 9 Meeting date: 29th October 2013 Report to: Board of the London Legacy Development Corporation F OR INFORMATION This material will be considered in public Appendix 1 – Draft Local Plan Consultation Document Appendix 2 – Interim Consultation Report Appendix 3 – Draft Summary for Consultation Leaflet Appendix 4 – Non Technical Summary for Sustainability Appraisal of the Local Plan Consultation Document Appendix 5 - Sustainability Appraisal of the Local Plan Consultation Document Appendix 6 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Screening Report Appendix 7 – Equalities Impact Assessment This page is intentionally left blank Appendix 1 Appendix 1 Draft Local Plan Consultation Document 9th October 2013 Version Control Version / Date Description of changes Reviewed/edited revision by 1.0 09/10/13 Alex Savine All maps within this document: © Crown Copyright 1999. Reproduced from Ordnance Survey Land-Line data with the permission of the controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Ordnance Survey and Land-Line are registered trademarks. Draft Local Plan Consultation Document London Legacy Development Corporation Local Plan Interim Consultation Document/draft/vs0.1 PROTECT - POLICY 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Spatial Portrait of the Legacy Corporation Area ......................................................................... 4 2. The
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Lea Valley Planning Framework
    LOWER LEA VALLEY Strategic Planning Guidance January 2007 II | OPPORTUNITY AREA PLANNING FRAMEWORK Copyright: Greater London Authority and London Development Agency January 2007 Published by Greater London Authority City Hall The Queen’s Walk London SE1 2AA www.london.gov.uk enquiries: 020 7983 4100 minicom: 020 7983 4458 ISBN 978 1 85261 988 6 Photographs: Cover: LDA Foreword: Liane Harris Maps based on Ordnance Survey Material. Crown Copyright. License No. LA100032379 Acknowledgements The Framework was prepared by the Greater London Authority with the support of a consortium led by EDAW plc with Allies & Morrison, Buro Happold, Capita Symonds, Halcrow and Mace and with additional support from Faithful & Gould, Hunt Dobson Stringer, Jones Lang LaSalle and Witherford Watson Mann Architects. LOWER LEA VALLEY OPPORTUNITY AREA PLANNING FRAMEWORK | i FOREWORD I am delighted to introduce the Opportunity Area Planning Framework for the Lower Lea Valley. The Framework sets out my vision for the Valley, how it could change over the next decade, and what that change would mean for residents, businesses, landowners, public authorities and other stakeholders. It builds on the strategic planning policies set out in my 2004 London Plan for an area of nearly 1450 hectares, extending from the Thames in the south to Leyton in the north, straddling the borders of Newham, Tower Hamlets, Hackney and Waltham Forest. The Lower Lea Valley is currently characterised by large areas of derelict industrial land and poor housing. Much of the land is fragmented, polluted and divided by waterways, overhead pylons, roads and railways. My aim is to build on the area’s unique network of waterways and islands to attract new investment and opportunities, and to transform the Valley into a new sustainable, mixed use city district, fully integrated into London’s existing urban fabric.
    [Show full text]
  • Prescott Channel Water Control Structure Project Explanatory Statement
    PRESCOTT CHANNEL WATER CONTROL STRUCTURE PROJECT EXPLANATORY STATEMENT Prescott Channel Water Control Structure Project Explanatory Statement Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................ 1 1.1 Project overview 1 1.2 Defra-family recommendation 1 1.3 Benefits 2 1.4Olympic waterway workshops 2 1.0 THE BOW BACK RIVERS ............................................................................ 3 2.0 TECHNICAL ................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Technical Assessment 5 3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL INFORMATION .............................................................. 9 3.1 Introduction 9 3.2 Study Area 10 3.3 Scope of the Proposed Works 13 3.4 Prescott Channel 13 3.5 Ecology and Nature Conservation 14 3.5.1 Birds .................................................................................................................. 14 3.5.2 Mammals .......................................................................................................... 15 3.5.3 Reptiles ............................................................................................................. 15 3.5.4 Fish 16 3.5.5 Crayfish ............................................................................................................. 18 3.5.6 Mudflat Invertebrates ........................................................................................ 18 3.5.7 Aquatic Plants ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Risk Assessment
    Crossrail Line 1 Mott MacDonald Assessment of Water Impacts Technical Report Cross London Rail Links Limited Appendix H: Flood Risk Assessment 203357/31/Final/February 2005 Appendix dividers H.doc Crossrail Line 1 Mott MacDonald Flood Risk Assessment - Surface Water Crossings Cross London Rail Links Limited Cross London Rail Links 1 Butler Place London SW1H 0PT United Kingdom Crossrail Line 1 Flood Risk Assessment – Surface Water Crossings Crossrail Reference: 1E0321-GOE00-00006 February 2005 Mott MacDonald Demeter House Station Road Cambridge CB1 2RS UK Tel : 44 (0)1223 463500 Fax : 44 (0)1223 461007 203357/31/Final/February 2005 AppH_1.doc Crossrail Line 1 Mott MacDonald Flood Risk Assessment - Surface Water Crossings Cross London Rail Links Limited Summary The proposed Crossrail route extends from Maidenhead in the west to Shenfield and Abbey Wood in the east. The route crosses a number of watercourses ranging from minor brooks to substantial main rivers. There are concerns that the proposed works may increase the potential for flooding at the crossing sites and in surrounding areas. There are also concerns that the Crossrail route may itself be affected by flood events at the crossings. Flood Risk Assessments have therefore been carried out in accordance with the procedures set out in the Government Planning Policy Guidance Note 25 (PPG25). These have been set out in this report, with the exception of Pudding Mill Lane (Route Window C13) where, because of the extent of the works proposed within watercourses, a more detailed Flood Risk Assessment has been carried out and is reported separately. In carrying out the required Flood Risk Assessments, reference has been made to the ‘Flood Map’, which is shown on the Environment Agency (EA) website as of 7 October 2004, and is the primary source of publicly available flood risk information.
    [Show full text]
  • Local Plan Consultation Appendices PDF 10 MB
    Agenda Item 5 Subject: Local Plan Consultation Document Report No: Appendices to Agenda Item 5. Meeting date: 22 nd October 2013 Report to: Planning Decisions Committee FOR INFORMATION This material will be considered in public Appendix 1 – Draft Local Plan Consultation Document Appendix 2 – Interim Consultation Report Appendix 3 – Draft Summary for Consultation Leaflet Appendix 4 – Non Technical Summary for Sustainability Appraisal of the Local Plan Consultation Document Appendix 5 - Sustainability Appraisal of the Local Plan Consultation Document Appendix 6 - Habitat Regulations Assessment Screening Report Page 1 This page is intentionally left blank Page 2 !""#$%&'() Appendix 1 Draft Local Plan Consultation Document 9th October 2013 Version Control Version / Date Description of changes Reviewed/edited revision by 1.0 09/10/13 Alex Savine All maps within this document: © Crown Copyright 1999. Reproduced from Ordnance Survey Land-Line data with the permission of the controller of Her Majesty's Stationery Office. Ordnance Survey and Land-Line are registered trademarks. Draft Local Plan Consultation Document London Legacy Development Corporation Local Plan Interim Consultation Document/draft/vs0.1 PROTECT - POLICY Page1 3 Introduction ................................................................................................................................ 3 1. Spatial Portrait of the Legacy Corporation Area ......................................................................... 4 2. The Policy Context .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Olympic Legacy Waterways Framework Olympic Legacy Waterways Framework Foreword 3
    OLYMPIC LEGACY WATERWAYS FRAMEWORK OLYMPIC LEGACY WATERWAYS FRAMEWORK FOREWORD 3 Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park straddles a previously hidden and derelict network of waterways known as the Bow Back Rivers. Shaped and adapted for over 1,000 years, these 6km of canals and rivers are finally re-connected to England and Wales’ 2,000 mile inland waterways network owned by the Canal & River Trust. They now lie at the heart of one of the biggest regeneration projects in Europe. Across the country, waterways are playing a vital role in revitalising our cities in an attractive and sustainable way. The restoration and transformation of the Bow Back Rivers through London’s Olympic plans and through the construction of Three Mills Lock has created a living legacy for London’s people and wildlife, and will form the backbone for a world class water city. The Olympic Legacy Waterways Framework developed by the London Legacy Development Corporation in partnership with the Canal & River Trust looks at how the rivers’ potential can be unlocked so that they are not just a visual backdrop to the surrounding developments, but a leisure and commercial resource in their own right. This strategy expands beyond the 6km within the Park to encompass the River Lee Navigation from Three Mills Island to Hackney Marshes and the lower end of the Hertford Union Canal – a length of 11km in total. ALLAN LEIGHTON, CANAL & RIVER TRUST The transformation of the rivers of the Lower Lea Valley is arguably the greatest waterway restoration this country has ever seen. It has turned, in just a few short years, some of the most neglected, polluted and abused canals and rivers in Britain into one of the jewels in London’s crown.
    [Show full text]
  • Stage One Consultation Report DRAFT
    1 Summary STRATFORD WATERFRONT Stage One Consultation Report DRAFT December 2017 MP101-SW02-01-XX-CC-REP-XXXX-XXXX-0003 P01 OFFICIAL: Protected 2 STRATFORD WATERFRONT Stage One Consultation Report 1 Summary CONTENTS 1 SUMMARY ....................................................3 4 FINDINGS ................................................50 1.1 Introduction 4 4.1 Introduction 52 1.2 Summary of events and involvement 6 4.2 Overall impressions 54 1.3 Synopsis of ndings 8 4.3 Public spaces 58 1.4 Recommendations 12 4.4 Buildings 60 4.5 Inclusivity and accessibility 63 4.6 Sustainability 66 2 BACKGROUND..........................................15 4.7 Workshops 68 2.1 Cultural and Education District 16 2.2 About Stratford Waterfront 17 2.3 Who is involved 18 5 TRACKING CHANGES......................... 72 2.4 About the design team 20 5.1 Introduction 74 2.5 About the site 22 5.2 Masterplan responses 76 2.6 Context 26 6 NEXT STEPS ...........................................78 3 CONSULTATION PROCESS ............... 30 6.1 Consultation timeline 80 3.1 Overview 32 6.2 Contact us 80 3.2 Consultation diary 34 3.3 Communication and promotion 36 APPENDICES........................................................82 3.4 Activities and events 38 A. Publicity and communication 84 3.5 Community and involvement 48 B. Exhibition materials 86 C. Questionnaire 98 D. Workshop worksheets 100 1 STRATFORD WATERFRONT Stage One Consultation Report 1 SUMMARY 1.1 Introduction 1.2 Summary of events and involvement 1.3 Synopsis of ndings 1.4 Recommendations STRATFORD WATERFRONT
    [Show full text]
  • Pudding Mill Round One Consultation Report Autumn 2019 This Report Has Been Prepared for the London Legacy Development Corporation by Rcka, ZCD and Gort Scott
    Pudding Mill Round One Consultation Report Autumn 2019 This report has been prepared for the London Legacy Development Corporation by RCKa, ZCD and Gort Scott. CONTENTS 1.0 Summary 5 1.1 Introduction 7 1.2 Summary of activities 8 1.3 Overview of findings 9 1.4 Recommendations for Round Two 17 2.0 Background 19 2.1 Vision for Pudding Mill 20 2.2 Who is involved 22 2.3 About Pudding Mill 24 3.0 Consultation process 31 3.1 Consultation rounds 33 3.2 Round One consultation timeline 34 3.3 Types of Stakeholders 36 3.4 Communication and promotion 38 3.5 Activities and events 40 3.6 Community involvement 46 4.0 Findings 49 4.1 Design Principles 50 4.2 Legacy Youth Voice Workshops 57 5.0 Tracking changes 69 6.0 Appendices 73 Pudding Mill - Round One Consultation Report 3 1.0 Summary UCL East London Stadium London Aquatics Centre Bridgewater Pudding Mill Lane Sugar House Island 6 Pudding Mill - Round 1 Consultation Report 1.1 INTRODUCTION Pudding Mill Where we are now The London Legacy Development Corporation’s The design teams are at the early stages of (LLDC) plans for Queen Elizabeth Olympic Park developing masterplans for Pudding Mill Lane and sees the creation of five new neighbourhoods. Bridgewater and the comments received will help Pudding Mill is one of these neighbourhoods and shape the proposals as they develop over the is comprised of two sites — Pudding Mill Lane and coming months before a planning application is Bridgewater — which together will deliver around submitted in 2021.
    [Show full text]