Maria Theresa of Austria Holds a Conspicuous Were Rife in High Places

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Maria Theresa of Austria Holds a Conspicuous Were Rife in High Places Conditions and Terms of Use Copyright © Heritage History 2010 Some rights reserved This text was produced and distributed by Heritage History, an organization dedicated to the preservation of classical juvenile history books, and to the promotion of the works of traditional history authors. The books which Heritage History republishes are in the public domain and are no longer protected by the original copyright. They may therefore be reproduced within the United States without paying a royalty to the author. The text and pictures used to produce this version of the work, however, are the property of Heritage History and are subject to certain restrictions. These restrictions are imposed for the purpose of protecting the integrity of the work, for preventing plagiarism, and for helping to assure that compromised versions of the work are not widely disseminated. In order to preserve information regarding the origin of this text, a copyright by the author, and a Heritage History distribution date are included at the foot of every page of text. We require all electronic and printed versions of this text include these markings and that users adhere to the following restrictions. 1. You may reproduce this text for personal or educational purposes as long as the copyright and Heritage History version are included. 2. You may not alter this text or try to pass off all or any part of it as your own work. 3. You may not distribute copies of this text for commercial purposes. 4. This text is intended to be a faithful and complete copy of the original document. However, typos, omissions, and other errors may have occurred during preparation, and Heritage History does not guarantee a perfectly reliable reproduction. PORTRAIT OF MARIA THERESA. Permission to use Heritage History documents or images for commercial purposes, or more information about our collection of traditional history resources can be obtained by contacting us at [email protected] Original Copyright 1905 by George P. Upton. 2 Distributed by Heritage History 2011 her old inheritance, though she lost Silesia; but Frederick was more than willing to make peace, for all Germany had been a terrible sufferer by the war and Prussia was in dire straits. RANSLATOR S REFACE T ' P The story of the life of the great queen is briefly told in these pages. It is the story of the life of a proud, ambitious Among the famous queens of the world—Catharine II queen; a wise, judicious ruler, who had the best interests of her of Russia, Elizabeth, Anne Boleyn, and Victoria of England, subjects at heart, and for whom they were always ready to die; Mary Queen of Scots, Isabella of Spain, Louise of Prussia, a woman of spotless personal character and true to all her Marie Antoinette, Marie and Catharine di Medici of France, domestic duties at a time when immorality and corruption and others, Maria Theresa of Austria holds a conspicuous were rife in high places. The story covers some of the same place. In statesmanship and patriotism she ranks with episodes of history which occur in the narrative of Frederick, Elizabeth and Catharine. As Catharine greatly improved the in this series, but is none the less interesting, as the reader will administration of her Empire, introduced new laws and find both sides presented. extended its frontiers, and as Elizabeth's reign was characterized by great commercial enterprises and G. P. U. extraordinary intellectual activity, so the reign of Maria CHICAGO, 1905. Theresa, though she was engaged for years in two great wars,—that of the War of the Austrian Succession and the Seven Years' War with Frederick for the recovery of Silesia, which he had taken from her,—proved to be of the highest benefit to Austria in the strengthening of law and the introduction of needed reforms and wise measures for the welfare of the Empire. For years she was engaged in war for the preservation of Silesia with the most potent sovereign in Europe— Frederick the Great. Doubtless he had some antique claim upon Silesia, but when Maria Theresa succeeded to the throne under the terms of the Pragmatic Sanction, all the European powers, Prussia among them, whose rights might be affected, renounced their claims. She relied upon their good faith, but on the slightest of pretexts Frederick broke it and determined to rob her of Silesia, even at the cost of plunging all Europe into a long and devastating war. He set aside a new treaty to enforce an old claim. He plainly condemned himself by his own words in his Memoirs: "Ambition, interest, the desire of making people talk about me carried the day and I decided for war." When peace was finally made, Maria Theresa retained Original Copyright 1905 by George P. Upton. 3 Distributed by Heritage History 2011 TIMELINE The following is a chronological statement of the more important events in the reign of Maria Theresa: TABLE OF CONTENTS 1717 Birth of Maria Theresa. 1731 Acceptance of the Pragmatic Sanction. 1733 War with France on behalf of King of Poland. 1736 Marriage of Maria Theresa to Francis of Lorraine. THE YOUNG QUEEN ................................................... 5 1739 Peace with Turkey. CAMPAIGNS AGAINST PRUSSIA AND FRANCE .......... 11 1740 Death of Emperor Charles VI. 1740 Succession of Maria Theresa. THE SECOND SILESIAN WAR ................................... 18 1745 Francis I elected Emperor. PLOTS AND COUNTERPLOTS..................................... 23 1741-45 War of the Austrian Succession. BATTLES OF THE SEVEN YEARS' WAR ..................... 27 1745 Peace concluded at Dresden. 1745-48 War with France. CLOSE OF THE LONG STRUGGLE .............................. 33 1748 Peace concluded at Aix-la-Chapelle. THE LAST DAYS OF MARIA THERESA ...................... 38 1757-63 Seven Years' War. 1763 Peace concluded at Hubertsburg. 1765 Death of Emperor Francis I. 1765 Succession of Joseph II. 1772 Partition of Poland. 1778-79 War of the Bavarian Succession concluded. 1780 Death of Maria Theresa. Original Copyright 1905 by George P. Upton. 4 Distributed by Heritage History 2011 presence of all the highest dignitaries of the Empire, and the baptism of the heiress to the throne took place on the evening CHAPTER I of the day of her birth with great pomp and splendor. After the loss of their first-born, the imperial couple were overjoyed at the advent of this child, and, amid all the cares and THE YOUNG QUEEN responsibilities forced upon him by his numerous wars, the devoted father never lost sight of his fixed purpose or relaxed It would almost seem that the Emperor Charles VI, the his efforts to obtain universal recognition of his law of father of Maria Theresa, had a presentiment of what was to succession among the European powers, as well as the various come, when, directly after his marriage, he obtained from the states of his own empire. He felt the importance of securing various states united under his dominion an order of his beloved daughter's undisputed title to the throne, while the succession called The Pragmatic Sanction, which decreed that Empress' motherly heart rejoiced at each hardly won in case his house should become extinct in the male line, acknowledgment of the rights of her child, who already succession to the throne should pass to his female descendants. showed signs of such splendid promise. To make this law binding and legal was such an important But it was not alone in such well-grounded and well- matter to him that it may be said to have been the chief aim of directed efforts that the parents' care showed itself: no pains his life. were spared to develop to the, fullest extent Maria Theresa's In the year 1716, to the great joy of the Emperor, a son abundant mental gifts and talents, so as to fit her for her future was born to him. Vienna and the whole country shared in the position as ruler of an empire; nor did the noble mother fail to rejoicings of the royal parents; but unfortunately their sow the seed and nourish the growth in her daughter's tender happiness was of short duration, for, before the Autumn of that nature of those womanly virtues which were to bear such rich year had strewn the earth with withered leaves, the heir to the harvest. throne had drooped and died. The Emperor's grief was intense, With loving eyes the wise and careful Empress and was made harder to bear by reason of the many other cares watched over the early training of the Princess' mind,—a mind and troubles which beset him on all sides at that time. which warranted the brightest hopes of all those to whose The second child was a daughter, Maria Theresa, who hands her education was intrusted. As may be readily was born May 13, 1717, and upon whose head, according to understood, these instructors were selected from among the the right of primogeniture established, by the Pragmatic most distinguished ladies of the Court; the Countesses von Sanction, the crowns of the united Austrian states were one Thurn and Valsassina, von Stubenberg and von Fuchs. They day to rest. Who could have imagined that this child, while worked in perfect accord with the august mother upon whose inheriting all the beauty of her mother, would be endowed at breast God had placed the precious jewel, and to whose care the same time with a masculinity of intellect, together with a He had intrusted the treasure. Later, as it became necessary for strength and wisdom, a firmness yet kindliness of disposition, her to occupy herself with more serious and important which but few men have manifested? subjects, learned and capable men were assigned the task of guiding the clear and active mind of the Princess through the St.
Recommended publications
  • Asions of Hungarian Tribes
    Timeline / 400 to 2000 / CZECH REPUBLIC Date Country | Description 833 A.D. Czech Republic The establishment of Great Moravia (Moravia, western Slovakia, parts of Hungary, Austria, Bohemia and Poland). 863 A.D. Czech Republic Spread of Christianity, arrival of missionaries Constantine (Cyril) and Methodius; establishment of Old Slavonic language, Glagolitic script. Archbishopric established. Conflicts with Frankish empire, invasions of Hungarian tribes. The foundation of Prague Castle. 965 A.D. Czech Republic Prague described in narration of Jewish-Arabian merchant Ibn Jákúb. Establishment of first (Benedictine) monasteries and Prague bishopric (974). Foundation of the Czech state under the Przemyslid dynasty. 1031 A.D. Czech Republic Origination of the Moravian Margraviate as part of the Czech state, with main centres Znojmo, Brno and Olomouc. 1063 A.D. Czech Republic Founding of Olomouc bishopric. Vratislav II made first Czech King (1085). The first Czech chronicle known as the Chronicle of Cosmas. Premonstratensian and Cistercian monasteries founded (1140). 1212 A.D. Czech Republic Golden Bull of Sicily: Roman King Friedrich II defines the relationship between Czech kings and the Holy Roman Empire. The Czech king becomes one of seven electors privileged to elect the Roman king. 1234 A.D. Czech Republic Establishment of towns. German colonisation. Invasion of the Mongolians (1241). Introduction of mining law (1249), the provincial court (1253) and provincial statutes. The Inquisition introduced (1257). 1278 A.D. Czech Republic P#emysl Otakar II killed at Battle of the Moravian Field. Under his rule, the Czech lands reached to the shores of the Adriatic. Bohemia governed by Otto of Brandenburg, Moravia by Rudolph of Habsburg.
    [Show full text]
  • Matrimony and Monarchy: the Failure of Bourbon-Habsburg Matrimonial Alliance
    Matrimony and Monarchy: The Failure of Bourbon-Habsburg Matrimonial Alliance Dr Samra Sarfraz Khan* Irum Iqbal Hussain** Abstract The research paper titled “Matrimony and Monarchy: The Failure of Bourbon-Habsburg Matrimonial Alliance,” is an in depth study of the matrimonial alliance between the Bourbon and Habsburg dynasties through the marriage of Louis XIV; the King of France, with the Spanish hieress Maria Theresa. This matrimonial alliance, which was arranged to start a new era of Franco-Spanish relations in the seventeenth century, was one of the many similar examples that had been followed in state craft from the earliest times. The paper serves a two-fold purpose: to bring to light the unsuccessful nature of this marriage, and to probe the various reasons for which the alliance was a failure in the very quintessence of a marriage. The paper highlights the factors that contributed in not only keeping the matrimonial alliance into a contentious relationship between Maria Theresa and Louis XIV but also in causing a decline in the political ties between the French and Spanish kingdoms. The research paper, thus, caters to an aspect in the study of matrimonial alliances that remains largely unexplored. Keywords: Matrimonial alliance, Bourbon, Hapsburg, monarch, expansion. * Samra Sarfraz Khan, Ph.D. Assistant Professor, Department of History, University of Karachi ** Irum Iqbal Hussain, Graduate Student, Institute of Ismaili Studies (IIS), UK 15 Jhss, Vol. 10, No. 2, July to December, 2019 Introduction The matrimonial alliance of Louis XIV and Maria Theresa was one in a series of similar state alliances that took place between the Bourbon and Habsburg royal families in their days of glory days.
    [Show full text]
  • The Funerals of the Habsburg Emperors in the Eighteenth Century
    The Funerals of the Habsburg Emperors In the Eighteenth Century MARK HENGERER 1. Introduction The dassic interpretation of the eighteenth century as aperiod of transition-from sacred kingship to secular state, from a divine-right monarchy to enlightened absolutism, from religion to reason-neglects, so the editor of this volume suggests, aspects of the continuing impact of religion on European royal culture during this period, and ignores the fact that secularization does not necessarily mean desacralization. If we take this point of view, the complex relationship between monarchy and religion, such as appears in funerals, needs to be revisited. We still lack a comparative and detailed study of Habsburg funerals throughout the entire eighteenth century. Although the funerals of the emperors in general have been the subject of a great deal of research, most historians have concentrated either on funerals of individual ruIers before 1700, or on shorter periods within the eighteenth century.l Consequently, the general view I owe debts of gratitude to MeJana Heinss Marte! and Derek Beales for their romments on an earlier version ofthis essay, and to ThomasJust fi'om the Haus-, Hof­ und Staatsarchiv, Vienna, for unbureaucratic access to the relevant source material. I Most attention has heen paid to Emperor Maximilian 1. Cf., among olhers, Peter Schmid, 'Sterben-Tod-Leichenbegängnis Kaiser Maximilians 1.', in Lothar Kolmer (ed.), Der Tod des A1iichtigen: Kult und Kultur des Sterbe1l5 spätmittelalterlicher Herrscher (Paderborn, 1997), 185-215; Elisaheth Scheicher, 'Kaiser Maximilian plant sein Denkmal', Jahrbuch des kunsthislmischen Museums Wien, I (1999), 81-117; Gabriele Voss, 'Der Tod des Herrschers: Sterbe- und Beerdigungsbrauchtum beim Übertritt vom Mittelalter in die frühe Neuzeit am Beispiel der Kaiser Friedrich IH., Maximilian L und Kar! V: (unpuhlished Diploma thesis, University ofVienna, 1989).
    [Show full text]
  • Roots of Modern Hungarian Nationalism: a Case Study and a Research Agenda
    UvA-DARE (Digital Academic Repository) The roots of Modern Hungarian Nationalism: A Case Study and a Research Agenda Marácz, L. Publication date 2016 Document Version Final published version Published in The roots of nationalism: national identity formation in early modern Europe, 1600-1815 Link to publication Citation for published version (APA): Marácz, L. (2016). The roots of Modern Hungarian Nationalism: A Case Study and a Research Agenda. In L. Jensen (Ed.), The roots of nationalism: national identity formation in early modern Europe, 1600-1815 (pp. 235-250). (Heritage and Memory Studies). Amsterdam University Press. http://www.oapen.org/search?identifier=606242 General rights It is not permitted to download or to forward/distribute the text or part of it without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), other than for strictly personal, individual use, unless the work is under an open content license (like Creative Commons). Disclaimer/Complaints regulations If you believe that digital publication of certain material infringes any of your rights or (privacy) interests, please let the Library know, stating your reasons. In case of a legitimate complaint, the Library will make the material inaccessible and/or remove it from the website. Please Ask the Library: https://uba.uva.nl/en/contact, or a letter to: Library of the University of Amsterdam, Secretariat, Singel 425, 1012 WP Amsterdam, The Netherlands. You will be contacted as soon as possible. UvA-DARE is a service provided by the library of the University of Amsterdam (https://dare.uva.nl) Download date:25 Sep 2021 The Roots of Nationalism National Identity Formation in Early Modern Europe, 1600‑1815 Edited by Lotte Jensen Amsterdam University Press This research has been made possible with the generous support of the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
    [Show full text]
  • Ann-Kathrin Deininger and Jasmin Leuchtenberg
    STRATEGIC IMAGINATIONS Women and the Gender of Sovereignty in European Culture STRATEGIC IMAGINATIONS WOMEN AND THE GENDER OF SOVEREIGNTY IN EUROPEAN CULTURE EDITED BY ANKE GILLEIR AND AUDE DEFURNE Leuven University Press This book was published with the support of KU Leuven Fund for Fair Open Access Published in 2020 by Leuven University Press / Presses Universitaires de Louvain / Universitaire Pers Leuven. Minderbroedersstraat 4, B-3000 Leuven (Belgium). Selection and editorial matter © Anke Gilleir and Aude Defurne, 2020 Individual chapters © The respective authors, 2020 This book is published under a Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial Non-Derivative 4.0 Licence. Attribution should include the following information: Anke Gilleir and Aude Defurne (eds.), Strategic Imaginations: Women and the Gender of Sovereignty in European Culture. Leuven, Leuven University Press. (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) ISBN 978 94 6270 247 9 (Paperback) ISBN 978 94 6166 350 4 (ePDF) ISBN 978 94 6166 351 1 (ePUB) https://doi.org/10.11116/9789461663504 D/2020/1869/55 NUR: 694 Layout: Coco Bookmedia, Amersfoort Cover design: Daniel Benneworth-Gray Cover illustration: Marcel Dzama The queen [La reina], 2011 Polyester resin, fiberglass, plaster, steel, and motor 104 1/2 x 38 inches 265.4 x 96.5 cm © Marcel Dzama. Courtesy the artist and David Zwirner TABLE OF CONTENTS ON GENDER, SOVEREIGNTY AND IMAGINATION 7 An Introduction Anke Gilleir PART 1: REPRESENTATIONS OF FEMALE SOVEREIGNTY 27 CAMILLA AND CANDACIS 29 Literary Imaginations of Female Sovereignty in German Romances
    [Show full text]
  • Louis XIV (1624–1715)
    Louis XIV (1624–1715) As ruler of France for 72 years, Louis XIV had a tremendous impact on his nation’s domestic institutions. Remembered for his probably apocryphal assertion, “I am the state,” Louis oversaw an absolutist regime that was the envy of monarchs across the continent, many of whom sought to emulate the French king. His ambitions also sparked an almost continual series of wars beginning in the 1660s and lasting almost to his death in 1715. What policies did Louis XIV implement in order to strengthen the absolutist state? What were his major foreign policy goals? * * * * * The child destined to raise French absolutism to its pinnacle was born in 1638 to parents who cared little for one another. Louis XIII and Anne of Austria had been wed largely out of diplomatic considerations and nurtured a mutual detestation for each other in the twenty-three years of marriage that preceded the birth of their son Louis. Since the mid-1620s, Louis XIII and his powerful chief minister Cardinal Richelieu had striven to lay the foundations for an absolutist Bourbon monarchy. The Cardinal’s death in 1642 presaged the death of the king by only a year, and as Louis was only five years old, Anne ruled as regent with the assistance of yet another powerful cleric, Cardinal Mazarin. Though Mazarin assumed responsibility for the education of the future king, Louis was ill served by his tutors and matured with only a marginal familiarity with most subjects. Both contemporary and modern commentators have noted that the one area the otherwise lackadaisical Louis excelled in as a pupil was in his understanding of political power and how it was effectively exercised.
    [Show full text]
  • Stefan Weis’ Study „Entirely Unbeknown to His Homeland- the Burgauers
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or Papa MY GRATITUDE to my girlfriend Esther, my mother, my family, my friends, my supervisor Ao. Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Thomas Albrich, to the Burgauer family members, to Pierre, in particular, and everyone else who accompanied and supported me on my path and in writing this thesis. 1 Fragments from the Burgauer story Foreword by Hanno Loewy, Director of the Jewish Museum Hohenems The Burgauer family first appeared in Hohenems in 1741, when Judith Burgauer, a young widow of twenty one and mother from the Burgau region near Augsburg settled in Hohenems to marry for a second time. Jonathan Maier Uffenheimer from Innsbruck was a wealthy merchant and gave her a chance to begin a new life. At least one child died young. Their son Abraham married 15 year old Sara Brettauer from Hohenems and moved to Venice.
    [Show full text]
  • David Matthew Jacob Swanson
    Habsburg Self and Bourbon Other in the Franco–Austrian Alliance, 1756–1791 by David Matthew Jacob Swanson A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in History Department of History and Classics University of Alberta © David Matthew Jacob Swanson, 2014 ii Abstract Taking cues from the work of Paul W. Schroeder, this project seeks to investigate the particular conditions which allowed the Habsburg Monarchy and two of its leading politicians—Leopold II and Metternich—to have such pride of place in Schroeder’s ‘transformation’ of the European state-system. It contends that the international politics of restraint, reciprocity, and far-sighted collective security predate the French Revolution and the Habsburg reaction to it, instead proceeding from the Austrian experience in the 18th Century. At the same time, inspired by both constructivist and critical approaches to diplomatic history, this project aims to set this ‘Habsburg self’ against its ‘Bourbon other’ in a discussion of the Monarchy’s primary ally from 1756–1791: the Kingdom of France. In this sense it acts as a much-needed counterpart to the burgeoning literature on French perceptions of Austria, Marie Antoinette, and Austrophobia. Far from a “deadlocked alliance”, what emerges from this analysis is the history of a relationship—founded on a significant degree of assumption of commensurability—which Habsburg policymakers consistently sought to improve through further investment and optimism, despite repeated disappointments. This structure serves to set France and Austria apart from the other Great Powers, particularly Prussia and Russia, in order to tentatively suggest that the diplomatic and foreign-policy cultures of ancien- régime Habsburg–Bourbon Europe anticipated the international order of the 19th Century.
    [Show full text]
  • A File in the Online Version of the Kouroo Contexture
    L’AUTRICHIENNE / L’AUTRE-CHIENNE For Ryan. — Marie xoxoxo BACK ACTIVE TRACK WHAT? INDEX L’AUTRICHIENNE L’AUTRE-CHIENNE 1755 November 2: Maria Antonia Josepha Johanna was born in the Hofburg Palace of Vienna, Austria, the 15th child of the Holy Roman Empress Maria Theresa, with the Holy Roman Emperor Francis I. She would become an Archduchess of Austria and then the Dauphine of France and then the Queen of France and of Navarre. 1762 October 13: 6-year-old Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart and his older sister Maria Anna Walburga Ignatia “Nannerl” Mozart perform at Schönbrunn Palace before Emperor Franz I, Empress Maria Theresa, 6-year-old Archduchess Maria Antonia Josepha Johanna, and the music teacher to the imperial family, Georg Christoph Wagenseil. Their father Leopold Mozart would write home to Salzburg, “Everyone is amazed, especially at the boy, and everyone whom I have heard says that his genius is incomprehensible.” 1765 According to L. Baudry de Saunier’s HISTOIRE GÉNÉRAL DE LA VÉLOCIPÈDIE published in 1891, le Comte de Sivrac had in this year demonstrated, for the pleasure of 10-year-old Maria Antonia Josepha Johanna at Versailles, a two-wheeled bicycle vehicle called a vélocefère having a wooden frame resembling a horse and a horse saddle for its occupant to sit upon. This vélocefère had in fact been, however, a horse-drawn coach. There is no extant evidence of any vehicle with two wheels in tandem before Von Drais invented the swiftwalker in 1817. It appears that in all probability this “le Comte de Sivrac” was merely the Jean- Henri Sievrac who had obtained a French patent on a horse-drawn carriage he had imported from England.
    [Show full text]
  • Henrietta Maria and Marie Antoinette
    Henrietta Maria and Marie Antoinette: Queenship and Revolution in Early Modern Europe By Carolyn Harris A thesis submitted to the Graduate Program in History in conformity with the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Queen’s University Kingston, Ontario, Canada May 2012 Copyright © Carolyn Harris 2012 Abstract: Henrietta Maria and Marie Antoinette: Queenship and Revolution in Early Modern Europe analyzes Henrietta Maria and Marie Antoinette in a thematic framework, focussing on the dialogue between their perceptions of themselves as heads of households, wives, and mothers and the expectations of their husbands’ subjects concerning the Queen Consort’s performance of these roles. The public nature of the Queen Consort’s position transformed the choices Henrietta Maria and Marie Antoinette made as wives and mothers into political acts with lasting implications for their respective royal houses. Both Queens approached their roles in a manner that ultimately contributed to the collapse of monarchical government. The question of the Queen’s actual activities and her contribution to popular discourse has been particularly neglected as the symbolism of Henrietta Maria, and especially Marie Antoinette has received more recent scholarly attention while discussion of each Queen’s actual motives has been relegated to popular biographies. The juxtaposition of the Queen’s own intentions with the expectations of her husband’s subjects provides a more complete picture of the ideological conflicts centering on the consort. These points of similarity and the comparative structure deepen the understanding of Henrietta Maria’s impeachment and Marie Antoinette’s trial because the juxtaposition of the two events reveals the continuous presence of the Queen Consort as a divisive figure throughout the Early Modern period.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thun-Hohenstein University Reforms 1849–1860
    The Thun-Hohenstein University Reforms 1849–1860 Conception – Implementation – Aftermath Edited by Christof Aichner and Brigitte Mazohl VERÖFFENTLICHUNGEN DER KOMMISSION FÜR NEUERE GESCHICHTE ÖSTERREICHS Band 115 Kommission für Neuere Geschichte Österreichs Vorsitzende: em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Brigitte Mazohl Stellvertretender Vorsitzender: Univ.-Prof. Dr. Reinhard Stauber Mitglieder: Dr. Franz Adlgasser Univ.-Prof. Dr. Peter Becker Univ.-Prof. i. R. Dr. Ernst Bruckmüller Univ.-Prof. Dr. Laurence Cole Univ.-Prof. Dr. Margret Friedrich Univ.-Prof. Dr. Elisabeth Garms-Cornides Univ.-Prof. Dr. Michael Gehler Univ.-Doz. Mag. Dr. Andreas Gottsmann Univ.-Prof. Dr. Margarete Grandner em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Hanns Haas Univ.-Prof. i. R. Dr. Wolfgang Häusler Univ.-Prof. i. R. Dr. Ernst Hanisch Univ.-Prof. Dr. Gabriele Haug-Moritz Dr. Michael Hochedlinger Univ.-Prof. Dr. Lothar Höbelt Mag. Thomas Just Univ.-Prof. i. R. Dr. Grete Klingenstein em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Alfred Kohler Univ.-Prof. Dr. Christopher Laferl Gen. Dir. Univ.-Doz. Dr. Wolfgang Maderthaner Dr. Stefan Malfèr Gen. Dir. i. R. H.-Prof. Dr. Lorenz Mikoletzky Dr. Gernot Obersteiner Dr. Hans Petschar em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Helmut Rumpler Univ.-Prof. Mag. Dr. Martin Scheutz em. Univ.-Prof. Dr. Gerald Stourzh Univ.-Prof. Dr. Arno Strohmeyer Univ.-Prof. i. R. Dr. Arnold Suppan Univ.-Doz. Dr. Werner Telesko Univ.-Prof. Dr. Thomas Winkelbauer Sekretär: Dr. Christof Aichner The Thun-Hohenstein University Reforms 1849–1860 Conception – Implementation – Aftermath Edited by Christof Aichner and Brigitte Mazohl Published with the support from the Austrian Science Fund (FWF): PUB 397-G28 Open access: Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported License.
    [Show full text]
  • Before Photography
    Before Photography- Part 1 Diego Rodríguez de Silva y Velázquez By Mario Sarra A few facts about Velázquez: -was born in Sevilla in 1599 -worked as an apprentice at the workshop of Francisco Pacheco -in 1619 Married Pacheco’s daughter -in 1623 was appointed court painter in Madrid after painting a portrait of the king -1629 traveled to Italy where he studied Raphael, Michelangelo, and Titian -1631 appointed palace superintendent -1652 appointed palace chamberlain -1659 Invested Knight of the Order of Saint James Whom or what did Velázquez paint? Everyday People… El vendedor de agua de Sevilla The Waterseller of Seville, c 1618-22, 2 of 3 versions shown Left: Apslet House, London Above: Walters Art Museum, Baltimore, each 41 x 31 inches La vieja friendo huevos Old Women Frying Eggs, 1618, National Gallery of Scotland, Edinburgh, 39 x 67 inches El almuerzo Peasants at the Table, c 1620, Museum Of Fine Arts, Budapest, Hungary, 44 x 38 inches Everyday people... Visited by mythological figures Los borrachos (el triunfo de Baco) The Drunkards (The Triumph of Bacchus), 1628, Museo del Prado, Madrid, 65 x 89 inches Painted for King Philip IV for 100 ducats. Las hilanderas (The Fable of Arachne) 1697, Museo del Prado, Madrid, 66 x 99 inches Painted for Don Pedro de Arce as gift to Philip IV. Apolo en la fragua de volcano Apollo in the Forge of Vulcan, 1630, Museo del Prado, Madrid, 88 x 144 inches Myth by Themselves La Venus del espejo Venus at her Mirror (Rokeby Venus), c 1647-1651 National Gallery, London, 48 x 70 inches Painted while in Rome.
    [Show full text]