ON GROWTH RATE AND CONTACT HOMOLOGY ANNE VAUGON Abstract. It is a conjecture of Colin and Honda that the number of peri- odic Reeb orbits of universally tight contact structures on hyperbolic mani- folds grows exponentially with the period, and they speculate further that the growth rate of contact homology is polynomial on non-hyperbolic geometries. Along the line of the conjecture, for manifolds with a hyperbolic component that fibers on the circle, we prove that there are infinitely many non-isomorphic contact structures for which the number of periodic Reeb orbits of any non- degenerate Reeb vector field grows exponentially. Our result hinges on the exponential growth of contact homology which we derive as well. We also compute contact homology in some non-hyperbolic cases that exhibit polyno- mial growth, namely those of universally tight contact structures on a circle bundle non-transverse to the fibers. 1. Introduction and main results The goal of this paper is to study connections between the asymptotic number of periodic Reeb orbits of a 3-dimensional contact manifold and the geometry of the underlying manifold. We first recall some basic definitions of contact geometry. A 1-form α on a 3-manifold M is called a contact form if α ∧ dα is a volume form on M.A (cooriented) contact structure ξ is a plane field defined as the kernel of a contact form. If M is oriented, the contact structure ker(α) is called positive if the 3-form α ∧ dα orients M. The Reeb vector field associated to a contact form α is the vector field Rα such that ιRα α = 1 and ιRα dα = 0. It strongly depends on α. The Reeb vector field (or the associated contact form) is called non-degenerate if all periodic orbits are non-degenerate (1 is not an eigenvalue of the differential of the first return map). A fundamental step in the classification of contact structures was the defini- tion of tight and overtwisted contact structures given by Eliashberg [21] following Bennequin [2]. A contact structure ξ is said to be overtwisted if there exists an embedded disk tangent to ξ on its boundary. Otherwise ξ is said to be tight. Uni- versally tight contact structures are structures admitting a tight lift on universal cover. A contact form is called hypertight if there is no contractible periodic Reeb arXiv:1203.5589v2 [math.SG] 5 Oct 2014 orbit. Universally tight and hypertight [32] contact structures are always tight. To study a contact structure, it is useful to focus on the periodic orbits of a Reeb vector field. Weinstein conjectured that every contact form on a closed manifold admits a periodic orbit and that was proved in dimension 3 by Taubes [51]. Beyond the existence of a single periodic Reeb orbit, Colin and Honda are interested in the number NL(α) of periodic Reeb orbits with period at most L. They believe it is related to one of the Thurston geometries of the underlying manifold, namely the hyperbolic geometry. Conjecture 1.1 (Colin-Honda [18, Conjecture 2.10]). For all non-degenerate con- tact forms α of a universally tight contact structure on a hyperbolic closed 3- manifold, NL(α) exhibits an exponential growth. 1 2 ANNE VAUGON The main result of this paper is related to Conjecture 1.1 and applies to manifolds with a non-trivial JSJ decomposition including a hyperbolic component that fibers on the circle (see [3] for more information). Theorem 1.2. Let M be a closed oriented connected 3-manifold which can be cut along a nonempty family of incompressible tori into irreducible manifolds including a hyperbolic component that fibers on the circle. Then, M carries an infinite number of non-isomorphic, hypertight, universally tight contact structures such that for all hypertight non-degenerate contact forms α, NL(α) grows exponentially with L. Additionally, if the full contact homology is well defined and invariant and if α is only non-degenerate then NL(α) grows exponentially with L. Currently, contact homology is not defined in full generality. In what follows this assumption will be called Hypothesis H. The proof of the first part of Theorem 1.2 uses only a well-defined contact homology : our assumptions on α assure that the contact homology is always well-defined. However, the second part of the theorem depends on Hypothesis H. See Section 2 for more details. The fibration condition in Theorem 1.2 is not an insurmountable restriction as Agol [1] recently proved the virtually fibered conjecture [52] which says that a hyperbolic 3-manifold fibers on the circle up to finite covering. Note that the situation in Theorem 1.2 is different from the situation in Conjecture 1.1. Contact homology and more generally Symplectic Field Theory (SFT) are in- variants of the contact structure introduced by Eliashberg, Givental and Hofer in 2000 [22]. This is a Floer homology invariant. The associated complex is generated by periodic Reeb orbits and the differential “counts” pseudo-holomorphic curves in the symplectization. Besides full contact homology, there exist two simpler contact homologies : cylindrical contact homology [9] and linearized contact homology which depends on a given “augmentation”. Computation of contact homology hinges on finding periodic orbits and and pseudo-holomorphic curve by solving elliptic partial differential equations and this is usually out of reach. The growth rate of contact homology is an invariant derived from the cylindrical or linearized contact homology introduced by Bourgeois and Colin [8]. It describes the asymptotic behavior with L of the number of periodic Reeb orbits with period smaller than L that contribute to contact homology. It is the contact equivalent of the growth rate of symplectic homology introduced by Seidel [50] and used by McLean [48] to distinguish be- tween cotangent bundles and smooth affine varieties. Theorem 1.2 is a corollary of Theorem 1.3. Theorem 1.3. Under the hypothesis of Theorem 1.2, the manifold M carries an infinite number of non-isomorphic, hypertight, universally tight contact structures with an exponential growth rate of cylindrical contact homology restricted to primi- tive classes. Under Hypothesis H, the growth rate of linearized contact homology is exponential for any pull-back of the trivial augmentation. The “pull-back” augmentations will be explained in Section 2.4. This theorem draws its inspiration in Colin and Honda’s results [18] on exponential growth of contact homology for contact structures adapted to an open book with pseudo- Anosov monodromy. As proved by Thurston [53], a manifold that fibers on the circle is hyperbolic if and only if it is the suspension of a surface by a diffeomorphism homotopic to a pseudo-Anosov map. Colin and Honda speculate further that the growth rate of contact homology is polynomial in the non-hyperbolic situations. These situations are the following. (1) On manifolds with spherical geometry, the growth rate of contact homology for universally tight contact structures is linear. ON GROWTH RATE AND CONTACT HOMOLOGY 3 (2) On manifolds with a geometric structure neither hyperbolic nor spherical, the growth rate of contact homology for universally tight contact structures is usually polynomial. There is however already an exception to the second situation we will soon discuss. In this paper, we study contact structures in a non-hyperbolic situation. We make use of Giroux [29] and Honda [38] classification of positive contact structures on circle bundles to try out Colin and Honda’s conjectures on a broad family of contact structures. Let π : M → S be a circle bundle over a closed compact surface. Figure 1 gives a summary of this classification. Statements such as “tangent to the fibers” or “transverse to the fibers” mean that there exists an isotopic contact structure with this property. Additionally, χ(S) is the Euler characteristic and χ(S, M) the Euler number of the fibration. universally tight contact structures non-transverse to the fibers transverse to the fibers tangent to the fibers non-tangent to the fibers χ(S) = 0 χ(S) < 0 χ(S, M) < 0 0 ≤ χ(S, M) ≤ −χ(S) quadratic growth exponential growth linear growth generally unknown Figure 1. Universally tight positive contact structures on circle bundles over a surface S with non-positive Euler characteristic. In some cases, the contact homology and its growth rate are already known. For instance, contact structures tangent to the fibers are fiberwise covering of (UT S, ξstd) where UTS is the unit tangent bundle over S and ξstd is the con- tact element contact structure (see for example [27]). In this case, the Reeb flow of the standard contact form associated to a Riemannian metric is the geodesic flow. If the surface is hyperbolic, there exists an unique closed geodesic in each homo- topy class [42, Theorem 3.9.5] and the number of homotopy classes has exponential growth with respect to length [49]. Therefore, growth rates of the number of peri- odic Reeb orbits and of contact homology are exponential. This is an exception to the second statement of the conjecture of Colin and Honda in the non-hyperbolic cases. If S is a torus, universally tight contact structures are standard contact structures on T 3 [28]. The contact homology is known [22] and its growth rate is quadratic, see for example Bourgeois’s Morse-Bott approach to contact homology [4]. Bour- geois also studied contact structures transverse and non-tangent to the fibers with χ(S, M) < 0. He computed contact homology and obtained a linear growth rate. Each of these contact structure has an S1-invariant contact structure in its isotopy class. In this paper we study the other cases where contact structures are universally tight and non-transverse to the fibers.