Memorial for Son Vandalised
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. [No. 121
3494 THE NEW ZEALAND GAZETTE. [No. 121 Classif!calion of Roads in Matamala County. Jones Road, Putarnru. Kerr's Road, Te Poi. Kopokorahi or Wawa Ron.ct. N p11rsuance and exercise of t~.e powers conferred on him Kokako Road, Lichfield. I by the Transport Department Act, 1929, and the Heavy Lake Road, Okoroire. Lichfield--Waotu Road. :VIotor-vchiclc Regulations 1940; the Minister of Tmnsport Leslie's Road Putaruru. Livingst,one's Road, Te Po.i. does here by revoke the Warrant classifying roads in the Lei.vis Road, Okoroire. Luck-at-Last Road, :.I\Taunga.- lVlatamata County dated the 11th day of October, 1940, and Lichfield-Ngatira Road. tautari. published in the New Zealand Gazette No. 109 of the 31st lvfain's Road, Okoroire. Matamata-vVaharoa Ro a. d day of October, 1940, at ps,ge 2782, and does hereby declare lWaiRey's Road, \Vaharoa. (East). that the roads described in the Schedule hereto and situated Mangawhero or Taihoa. Road. Iviata.nuku Road, Tokoroa. in the Matamata County shall belong to tho respective J\faraetai Road, Tokoroa. 1\faungatautari ]/fain ltmuJ. classes of roads shown in the said Schedule. J\fatai Road. MeM:illan's Road, Okoroire. lvlatamata-Hinnera. Road l\foNab's Road, 'l'e Poi. (West). Moore's Road, Hinuera. SCHEDULE. :Th!Ia,tamata-Turanga.-o-moana l\'Iorgan1s Road, Peria. MATAMATA COUNTY. - Gordon Road (including l\'Iuirhead's Road, Whitehall. Tower Road). l\1urphy Road, Tirau. RoAbs classified in Class Three : Available for tho use thereon of any multi-axled heavy motor-vehicle or any Nathan's Road, Pnket,urna. -
Ages on Weathered Plio-Pleistocene Tephra Sequences, Western North Island, New Zealand
riwtioll: Lowe. D. ~.; TiP.I>CU. J. M.: Kamp. P. J. J.; Liddell, I. J.; Briggs, R. M.: Horrocks, 1. L. 2001. Ages 011 weathered Pho-~Je.stocene tephra sequences, western North Island. New Zealand. Ill: Juviglle. E.T.: Raina!. J·P. (Eds). '"Tephras: Chronology, Archaeology', CDERAD editeur, GoudeL us Dossiers de f'ArcMo-Logis I: 45-60. Ages on weathered Plio-Pleistocene tephra sequences, western North Island, New Zealand Ages de sequences de tephras Plio-Pleistocenes alteres, fie du Nord-Ouest, Nouvelle lelande David J. Lowe·, J, Mark Tippett!, Peter J. J, Kamp·, Ivan J. LiddeD·, Roger M. Briggs· & Joanna L. Horrocks· Abstract: using the zircon fISsion-track method, we have obtainedfive ages 011 members oftwo strongly-...-eathered. silicic, Pliocene·Pleislocelle tephra seql/ences, Ihe KOIIIUQ and Hamilton Ashformalions, in weslern North !sland, New Zealand. These are Ihe jirst numerical ages 10 be oblained directly on these deposils. Ofthe Kauroa Ash sequence, member KI (basal unit) was dated at 2,24 ± 0.19 Ma, confirming a previous age ofc. 1.25 Ma obtained (via tephrochronology)from KlAr ages on associatedbasalt lava. Members K1 and X3 gave indistinguishable ages between 1,68.±0,/1 and 1.43 ± 0./7 Ma. Member K11, a correlQlilV! ojOparau Tephra andprobably also Ongatiti Ignimbrite. was dated at 1.18:i: 0.11 Ma, consistent with an age of 1.23 ± 0.02 Ma obtained by various methodr on Ongaiiti Ignimbrite. Palaeomagnetic measurements indicated that members XI3 to XIJ (top unit, Waiterimu Ash) are aged between c. 1.2 Ma and O. 78 Mo. Possible sources of/he Kauroa Ash Formation include younger \!Oleanic centres in the sOllthern Coromandel Volcanic Zone orolder volcanic cenlres in the Taupo Volcanic Zone, or both. -
Forest Management Plan Public Summary 2017
Hancock Forest Management (NZ) Ltd Forest Management Plan Public Summary 2017 Cover Picture: Tarawera Forest and Mount Putauaki, Kawerau, Bay of Plenty This is a working document, and as such will be updated periodically as we continually evaluate, develop and refine our forest management plans and objectives. Contents 1.0 Introduction .......................................................................................... 3 2.0 Overview of HFM NZ ............................................................................. 3 2.1 Estate Description .......................................................................................... 3 2.2 HFM NZ Offices .............................................................................................. 4 2.3 Management Objectives ................................................................................. 4 2.4 FSC® (Forest Stewardship Council®) Certification ......................................... 7 2.5 PEFC (NZS AS 4708) Certification ................................................................... 7 2.6 External Agreements ...................................................................................... 8 3.0 Overview of Forest Operations ............................................................. 9 3.1 Silviculture ..................................................................................................... 9 3.2 Harvest Operations ...................................................................................... 15 4.0 Health and Safety ............................................................................... -
Auckland Regional Office of Archives New Zealand
A supplementary finding-aid to the archives relating to Maori Schools held in the Auckland Regional Office of Archives New Zealand MAORI SCHOOL RECORDS, 1879-1969 Archives New Zealand Auckland holds records relating to approximately 449 Maori Schools, which were transferred by the Department of Education. These schools cover the whole of New Zealand. In 1969 the Maori Schools were integrated into the State System. Since then some of the former Maori schools have transferred their records to Archives New Zealand Auckland. Building and Site Files (series 1001) For most schools we hold a Building and Site file. These usually give information on: • the acquisition of land, specifications for the school or teacher’s residence, sometimes a plan. • letters and petitions to the Education Department requesting a school, providing lists of families’ names and ages of children in the local community who would attend a school. (Sometimes the school was never built, or it was some years before the Department agreed to the establishment of a school in the area). The files may also contain other information such as: • initial Inspector’s reports on the pupils and the teacher, and standard of buildings and grounds; • correspondence from the teachers, Education Department and members of the school committee or community; • pre-1920 lists of students’ names may be included. There are no Building and Site files for Church/private Maori schools as those organisations usually erected, paid for and maintained the buildings themselves. Admission Registers (series 1004) provide details such as: - Name of pupil - Date enrolled - Date of birth - Name of parent or guardian - Address - Previous school attended - Years/classes attended - Last date of attendance - Next school or destination Attendance Returns (series 1001 and 1006) provide: - Name of pupil - Age in years and months - Sometimes number of days attended at time of Return Log Books (series 1003) Written by the Head Teacher/Sole Teacher this daily diary includes important events and various activities held at the school. -
Fees and Charges 2017-18
Fees and Charges 2017-18 ECM DocSetID: 398465 All amounts are GST inclusive (15%) Fees are exclusive of any transaction fees imposed by banks ie credit card charges Page 1 of 40 Fees and Charges 2017-18 Index of Fees and Charges Ko Ngā Whakautu 1.Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.Abandoned vehicles ........................................................................................................................................ 5 3.Building consent fees ...................................................................................................................................... 6 4.Bylaw administration, monitoring and enforcement charges ........................................................................... 8 5.Camping permit fee ......................................................................................................................................... 8 6.Cemetery charges ........................................................................................................................................... 9 7.Corridor access request .................................................................................................................................. 9 8.Code of practice for subdivision and development ........................................................................................ 10 9.Council publications for sale ......................................................................................................................... -
Raukawa Claims Settlement Act 2014
Reprint as at 30 January 2021 Raukawa Claims Settlement Act 2014 Public Act 2014 No 7 Date of assent 19 March 2014 Commencement see section 2 Contents Page 1 Title 7 2 Commencement 7 Part 1 Preliminary matters, acknowledgements and apology, and settlement of historical claims Preliminary matters 3 Purpose 7 4 Provisions to take effect on settlement date 8 5 Act binds the Crown 8 6 Outline 8 Summary of historical account, acknowledgements, and apology of the Crown 7 Summary of historical account, acknowledgements, and apology 9 8 Summary of historical account 9 9 Acknowledgements 11 10 Apology 14 Note Changes authorised by subpart 2 of Part 2 of the Legislation Act 2012 have been made in this official reprint. Note 4 at the end of this reprint provides a list of the amendments incorporated. This Act is administered by the Ministry of Justice. 1 Reprinted as at Raukawa Claims Settlement Act 2014 30 January 2021 Interpretation provisions 11 Interpretation of Act generally 14 12 Interpretation 14 13 Meaning of Raukawa 17 14 Meaning of historical claims 17 Historical claims settled and jurisdiction of courts, etc, removed 15 Settlement of historical claims final 19 Amendment to Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 16 Amendment to Treaty of Waitangi Act 1975 20 Resumptive memorials no longer to apply 17 Certain enactments do not apply 20 18 Resumptive memorials to be cancelled 21 Miscellaneous matters 19 Limit on duration of trusts does not apply 22 20 Access to deed of settlement 22 Part 2 Cultural redress Subpart 1—Statutory acknowledgement, geothermal -
Environmental Pest Plants
4.8.3 Indigenous forest on the range and plateaus The Kaimai forests were included in the National Forest Survey (NFS) of indigenous timber resources of 1946-55. The southern half of the ranges was systematically sampled in 1946-48 and the northern half sampled less intensively in 1951-52. These data were used for the compilation of forest type maps (Dale and James 1977). The northern ranges were further sampled by the Ecological Forest Survey in 1965-66, to provide data for more detailed ecological typing. Descriptions of vegetation composition and pattern on the range and plateaus are provided by Dale and James (1977), Clarkson (2002), and Burns and Smale (2002). Other vegetation maps are provided by Nicholls (1965, 1966a&b, 1967a&b, 1971a&b, 1974a, 1975). Further descriptive accounts are provided by Nicholls (1968, 1969, 1972, 1976a&b, 1978, 1983a-c, 1984, 1985a&b, 2002). Beadel (2006) provides a comprehensive overview of vegetation in the Otanewainuku Ecological District and also provides vegetation descriptions and vegetation type maps for privately-owned natural areas within the tract, such as at Te Waraiti and the Whaiti Kuranui Block. Humphreys and Tyler (1990) provide similar information for the Te Aroha Ecological District. A broad representation of indigenous forest pattern is provided in Figure 9. Tawa and kamahi (Weinmannia racemosa) with scattered emergent rimu and northern rata dominates forests on the Mamaku Plateau (Nicholls 1966, Smale et al. 1997). Rimu increases in abundance southwards across the plateau, as the contribution of coarse rhyolitic tephra to soils increased (Smale et al. 1997). Beeches (Nothofagus spp.) (beeches) are present locally on the plateau (Nicholls 1966). -
Kinleith Transformation
Improving Maintenance Operation through Transformational Outsourcing Jacqueline Ming-Shih Ye MIT Sloan School of Management and the Department of Engineering Systems 50 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142 408-833-0345 [email protected] Abstract Outsourcing maintenance to third-party contractors has become an increasingly popular option for manufacturers to achieve tactical and/or strategic objectives. Though simple in concept, maintenance outsourcing is difficult in execution, especially in a cost-sensitive environment. This project examines the Full Service business under ABB Ltd to understand the key factors that drive the success of an outsourced maintenance operation. We present a qualitative causal loop diagram developed based on the case study of Kinleith Pulp and Paper Mill in New Zealand. The diagram describes the interconnections among various technical, economic, relationship, and humanistic factors and shows how cost-cutting initiatives can frequently undermine labor relationship and tip the plant into the vicious cycle of reactive, expensive work practices. The model also explains how Kinleith achieved a remarkable turnaround under ABB, yielding high performance and significant improvements in labor relations. A case study of Tasman Pulp and Paper Mill provides a contrasting case where success has been more difficult. Results point to the importance of creating sufficient resources (“slack”) to implement improvement activities and pace implementation based on pre-existing dynamics on site. Introduction From multi-million dollar IT systems and Lean methodology to smaller-scale initiatives around organizational design or human resource development, companies continue to search for ways to better performance. Outsourcing, once seen as pure cost-reduction, is increasingly viewed as an option with considerable strategic value. -
Te Aroha Tourism Precinct Development Feasibility
& PARTNER CONSULTANTS October 2019 Te Aroha Tourism Precinct Development Feasibility Prepared for Matamata-Piako District Council and Partners INFORMATION Document Reference Te Aroha Tourism Precinct Feasibility Study Authors Craig Jones, Gordon Cessford, Rob McDonald, Lawrence McIlrath, Ana Crawford, Phil Howard and Morné Hugo. Sign off Craig Jones Version Final Feasibility Study Report Date 9/ 10/19 Disclaimer: Information, data and general assumptions used in the compilation of this report have been obtained from sources believed to be reliable. Visitor Solutions Ltd has used this information in good faith and makes no warranties or representations, express or implied, concerning the accuracy or completeness of this information. Interested parties should perform their own investigations, analysis and projections on all issues prior to acting in any way regarding this project. © Visitor Solutions 2019. TE AROHA | TOURISM PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY 1 CONSULTANT TEAM Deloitte TE AROHA | TOURISM PRECINCT DEVELOPMENT FEASIBILITY 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY In order to stimulate business growth and economic development that improves social cohesion, economic and cultural outcomes for the Te Aroha community, a feasibility study has been commissioned to conceptualise and explore a range of visitor experiences associated with the development of the Te Aroha visitor precinct. The client perceived the existing natural, historical and cultural assets of the Te Aroha Domain, and its surrounds, could be enhanced and developed into a spa resort. Well situated in the Auckland-Hamilton-Tauranga triangle, Te Aroha may leverage and capture some of the emerging tourism business. A consortium led by Visitor Solutions was appointed to undertake a feasibility study to assess these and other tourism opportunities within Te Aroha. -
Tokoroa Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade South Waikato District Council
Tokoroa Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrade South Waikato District Council • Four Treatment Plants • Tirau Consent Approved Late 2020 • Putāruru Consent Approved Late 2020 • Arapuni Consent Expired 1 July 2020 • Tokoroa Consent Expired 31 Dec 2011 • Tokoroa and Arapuni Consent lodged in 2018 • Notified (likely), New NPS, and NES Tokoroa Wastewater Treatment Plant Existing • Digester, Consolidation, Mechanical Biosolids • Step Screen • 3 Clarifiers • 2 Trickling Filters • FAST 1st in NZ • Drum Filter • UV Disinfection • SWDC inherited the Arapuni Treatment plant from ECNZ in 1993 • Discharge to ground infiltration on west side of Waikato River • Imhoff tank was built in the 1930’s • Upgraded in 1982, sand beds added • Tirau Plant. • It was upgraded in 2005 • Was first membrane treatment in NZ Phasing of Upgrades CAPEX ($000) INCREASED OPEX Year Proposed Staging for Discussion with WRC 1 2019 Wetlands for Tirau $ 418 $ 572 $ 60,600 $ 82,800 2 2020 Sludge Upgrade at Tokoroa - Enabling works for TN and TP upgrades $ 4,469 $ 6,115 $ 183,200 $ 250,700 2 2020 Putāruru Sludge Upgrade (additional centrifuge at Tokoroa) $ 2,466 $ 3,375 $ 233,000 $ 318,800 2 2020 Wetlands for Putāruru $ 599 $ 820 $ 251,400 $ 343,900 3 2021 Wetlands for Tokoroa $ 1,117 $ 1,529 $ 280,000 $ 383,000 4 2022 Tokoroa - TP Upgrade $ 631,200 $ 863,600 8 2026 Putaruru TN Upgrade $ 5,421 $ 7,418 $ 906,100 $ 1,239,700 12 2030 Arapuni $ 1,225 $ 1,676 $ 916,100 $ 1,254,700 14 2032 Tokoroa - TN Upgrade $ 3,250 $ 4,447 $ 1,236,500 $ 1,693,200 22 2040 Putaruru TP Upgrade $ 164 $ 225 $ 1,320,100 $ 1,807,600 27 2045 Tirau TN and TP Upgrade $ 2,088 $ 2,857 $ 1,398,800 $ 1,929,000 35 2053 Consent Expiry $ 21,217 $ 29,034 $ 1,398,800 $ 1,929,000 Tokoroa Wastewater Treatment Plant Upgrades over the years Tokoroa Wastewater Treatment Plant • 1958 • Initially a primary Dortmund, followed by two low rate biological filters and a final Dortmund sedimentation tank. -
Pūrongorongo Ā-Tau Annual Report Te Poari Matua O
TE POARI MATUA O RAUKAWA RAUKAWA SETTLEMENT TRUST PŪRONGORONGO Ā-TAU ANNUAL REPORT PohPoohohatuturoaoa ststandanandds strottrong amiam dsstt tht e forests andld lakes of te Pae o Raukawa 2 He tinitētēkura ka hauhakeingākākanowhakatōkia engāmātua,tūpuna He pakiakaterākauitūai,meikore akekorātou,kuakorerawahokimātou Nā mātou,nātātou tekawengakiaūtonukingāmahi ikōkiritiaerātoumā TŪ Tēnā tātoungāwaihotangaehīakeanaiteātākura Tēnā Ko tekawaioRaukawaK Kei ngāihi,keiwehi,mana,reo RO Whakatakoto ihokoMeremere-tū-ahiahiitepō MŌ Nei rā ngā mihi o Te PoariMatuaoRaukawa Nei rāngāmihioTe o Whakaaraara maikoKōpūiteatahāpara t NG Kei ngāwhakatamarahikiterangi TA Kei ngāwhakateiteikitewhenua e kaw R H O Nō reira,whāiakia mau! A O I RRA HO HO KAMA TĀ TU UE KĀKATI = M TA UK TUR a TU WH MA TA NG i Ā o AW O PU HI O A TA AT Ra O P I M O A E A NAN PŪ AO A u kawa AR RA ANG U I RAUKAWA SETTLEMENT TRUST ANNUAL REPORT 2010 RĀRANGIRĀRANGI ŪPOKOŪPOKO CONTENTSCONTENTS Highlights 4 Introduction 6 Raaukawa Seettlement Trust report Chairmaan’s report 10 A word frrom the KaumĀtua 12 Raukawa 2030 14 Chih eef Execuutive’s commentary 15 Finaancial sttatements 16 Raukawa Trust Board report 24 Chaiirmam n’s reeport 26 Key evev nts 28 Raukawa Fisheeries Limited 28 Report aga ainst the business plan 29 Financial stateements 51 TThe story of TĀwhao, TŪrongo and MĀhinaarrangi 62 3 OUR JOURNEY SO FAR HAUMĀUIUI Raukawa’s true journey began long before HIGHLIGHTS our organisation was formally established in 1987, with the Raukawa descendants who have always fought for acknowledgement of our rightful claims and recognition as Nga Uri o Raukawa. With the birth of our organisational identity came a focused way to set and succeed in • Raukawa Trust our goals, and the highlights of our journey so Board becomes far are illustrated by the achievement of key an Iwi Mandated programmes, events and changes that begin • The Training Unit opened Organisation of the Tu Matauranga Te Ohu Kaimoana the work of empowering uri and forging an Training Unit ever-stronger and more unifi ed tribe. -
Plan Change 3 Snas Summary Of
RDC - 950566 Plan Change 3 - Significant Natural Areas - Summary of Submissions Consider Joint Submitter Address for Service Support / Wish to be Topic Submitter Name Address for Service (Email) Presentation Decision Sought Reasons # (Postal) Oppose heard (Y/N) (Y/N) Site 659 - 1 1.01 Aislabie, V & B 52 Dudley Road [email protected] S N N Supports not to include their property as SNA The area identified for further protection in your maps predominantly exists across the property boundary at 62 Dudley Mervyn Street Kaharoa m [at 52 Dudley Road] that is already Road. We agree that providing further protection to these types of areas, which are already protected could cause covenanted. confusion in the future. f) Sites with 2 2.01 Bay of Plenty Regional Council [email protected] O Y (Regarding new and expanded SNAs) - Regarding considering of new and expanded SNAs - BOPRC retain concerns about the exclusion of some sites assessed as alternative Toi Moana (BOPRC) Include all sites that meet significance meeting the RPS Appendix F Set 3 criteria and/or provided protection under other means. We consider areas covenanted legal criteria. Ensure completeness of the SNA or protected by other mechanisms should still be added where these sites meet SNA assessment criteria. Generally these protection layer, District Plan schedule and maps. covenants seek to protect indigenous vegetation/ecological values which aligns with the purpose of SNAs. Our main (general concern is occasionally covenants are removed to enable subdivision and development inconsistent with the purpose of points) PC3. Excluding such areas poses a risk that their private protection status may be removed leaving them with no protection under the District Plan.