Rainwater Tanks Report

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Rainwater Tanks Report Water Source Alternative Options Assessment for the Metropolitan Supply Rainwater Tanks Concept Report Prepared for Watercare Services Ltd Prepared by Beca Limited 9 December 2020 Creative people together transforming our world | Rainwater use assessment | Revision History Revision Prepared By Description Date Nº 1 Haddon Smith Frist draft 18 th Nov 2020 2 Haddon Smith Final draft 27 th Nov 2020 3 Haddon Smith Final 9th Dec 2020 Document Acceptance Action Name Signed Date Prepared by Haddon Smith 9th Dec 2020 Reviewed by Jon Reed 9th Dec 2020 Approved by Clive Rundle 9th Dec 2020 on behalf of Beca Limited © Beca 2020 (unless Beca has expressly agreed otherwise with the Client in writing). This report has been prepared by Beca on the specific instructions of our Client. It is solely for our Client’s use for the purpose for which it is intended in accordance with the agreed scope of work. Any use or reliance by any person contrary to the above, to which Beca has not given its prior written consent, is at that person's own risk. Waikato River Water Take and Discharge Proposal – Board of Inquiry | i Contents Executive Summary ........................................................................................ 1 1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Background............................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 This report .............................................................................................................................. 4 1.3 Purpose of this report ............................................................................................................ 5 1.4 Scenarios modelled in the 2015 report .................................................................................. 6 1.5 Storage developed by rainwater tanks .................................................................................. 8 2 Tanker demand during dry periods ....................................................... 10 3 Modelled yield of rainwater tanks at Watercare’s Peak Level of Service ...................................................................................................... 13 4 Modelled yield of rainwater tanks at Watercare’s Annual average drought Level of Service ......................................................................... 19 5 Advantages and disadvantages of rainwater tanks ............................. 22 5.1 Potential benefits of rainwater tanks ................................................................................... 22 5.2 Disadvantages of rainwater tanks ....................................................................................... 22 6 Yield recommendations .......................................................................... 24 7 Cost estimate ........................................................................................... 26 7.1 Capital costs ........................................................................................................................ 26 7.2 Operational costs ................................................................................................................. 26 7.3 Optimistic scenario costing .................................................................................................. 28 8 Conclusions ............................................................................................. 29 Appendices Appendix A – Peak results tables Appendix B – Annual average yield plots for scenarios 1-4 Waikato River Water Take and Discharge Proposal – Board of Inquiry | ii Tables Table 1-1: Definition of tank sizes ........................................................................................................... 7 Table 4-1: Annual average drought yields obtained under the optimistic scenario for differnce use types ...................................................................................................................................................... 20 Table 6-1: Summary of different use types ........................................................................................... 24 Table 7-1: Capital costs of rain tank installations by tank size .............................................................. 27 Table 7-2: Average capital costs by development type based on the optimistic scenario .................... 27 Table 7-3: Operational costs ................................................................................................................. 27 Table 7-5: Optimistic scenario cost analysis summary ......................................................................... 28 Table A1: 2019 rain tank peak results under outdoor use .................................................................... 32 Table A2: 2020 rain tank peak results under outdoor use .................................................................... 33 Table A3: 2019 rain tank peak results under non-potable use.............................................................. 34 Table A4: 2020 rain tank peak results non-potable use ........................................................................ 35 Table A5: 2019 rain tank peak results all use ....................................................................................... 36 Table A6: 2020 rain tank peak results under all use ............................................................................. 37 Waikato River Water Take and Discharge Proposal – Board of Inquiry | iii Figures Figure 1-1: How this report feeds into the overall options assessment process in the “Water Source Options Assessment for the Metropolitan Supply” report ........................................................................ 6 Figure 1-2: Definition of the modelled scenarios in the 2015 report, note that the uptake dates shown here have been moved forward by five years for the purpose of this 2020 update (i.e. references to 2050 in the table are 2055 in results produced for this report)................................................................ 7 Figure 1-3: Summary of rainwater tank penetration over a 35 year period (optimistic scenario) ........... 8 Figure 1-4: Simplified model schematic .................................................................................................. 8 Figure 1-5: Total rain tank storage volume under the Optimistic uptake scenario, compared to Watercare's total lake storage volume and Watercare’s smallest storage lake (Hays Creek) ................ 9 Figure 2-1: Tanker consumption by financial year ................................................................................ 10 Figure 2-2: Normalised monthly tanker consumption for the 2016 to 2020 financial years .................. 11 Figure 2-3: Timeseries showing relationship between total tanker consumption and monthly rainfall . 11 Figure 2-4: Relationship between tanker consumption and monthly rainfall between February 2015 and June 2020 ....................................................................................................................................... 12 Figure 3-1: Average yield over peak 5 days in various recent dry years under the optimistic scenario (note that the 5 days averaged are the highest individual 5 days of demand, not the highest 5 consecutive days) .................................................................................................................................. 14 Figure 3-2: Average yield in February in various recent dry years under the optimistic scenario ........ 14 Figure 3-3: Average yield in January, February and March in various recent dry years under the optimistic scenario ................................................................................................................................. 15 Figure 3-4: Average volume and demand met by medium sized tanks at single residential properties during the 2020 summer ........................................................................................................................ 16 Figure 3-5: Average volume and demand met by medium tanks at single residential properties during the 2014 summer ................................................................................................................................... 17 Figure 3-6: Average yield over different peak periods under different tank sizes in 2019 and 2020 with rainwater tanks supplying non-potable use ........................................................................................... 18 Figure 4-1: Optimistic scenario rainwater tank annual average drought yield at 2055 - 36% of properties by 2055 ................................................................................................................................. 20 Figure 4-2: Average yield through the year from simulations corresponding to dry [99% series] median [50% series] and wet [1% series] years under the optimistic scenario supplying non-potable demand. ............................................................................................................................................................... 21 Figure 6-1: Growth in the annual average drought yield of rainwater tanks under the ‘optimistic’ scenario ................................................................................................................................................. 25 Figure 7-1: Annual capital and operation costs of rainwater
Recommended publications
  • A Smart Water Grid for Micro-Trading Rainwater: Hydraulic Feasibility Analysis
    water Article A Smart Water Grid for Micro-Trading Rainwater: Hydraulic Feasibility Analysis Elizabeth Ramsey* , Jorge Pesantez , Mohammad Ali Khaksar Fasaee , Morgan DiCarlo , Jacob Monroe and Emily Zechman Berglund Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA; [email protected] (J.P.); [email protected] (M.A.K.F.); [email protected] (M.D.); [email protected] (J.M.); [email protected] (E.Z.B.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 30 September 2020; Accepted: 29 October 2020; Published: 2 November 2020 Abstract: Water availability is increasingly stressed in cities across the world due to population growth, which increases demands, and climate change, which can decrease supply. Novel water markets and water supply paradigms are emerging to address water shortages in the urban environment. This research develops a new peer-to-peer non-potable water market that allows households to capture, use, sell, and buy rainwater within a network of water users. A peer-to-peer non-potable water market, as envisioned in this research, would be enabled by existing and emerging technologies. A dual reticulation system, which circulates non-potable water, serves as the backbone for the water trading network by receiving water from residential rainwater tanks and distributing water to households for irrigation purposes. Prosumer households produce rainwater by using cisterns to collect and store rainwater and household pumps to inject rainwater into the network at sufficiently high pressures. The smart water grid would be enabled through an array of information and communication technologies that provide capabilities for automated and real-time metering of water flow, control of infrastructure, and trading between households.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Mitigation in the Water Sector Or How to Reduce the Carbon Footprint of Water
    Climate change mitigation in the water sector or How to reduce the carbon footprint of water by Taryn Pereira Table of contents Executive Summary .................................................................................... 4 Introduction ................................................................................................5 Water and climate change mitigation ..........................................................7 The water-energy nexus ............................................................................. 9 Bulk water supply .....................................................................................11 Treatment of raw water .............................................................................16 Wastewater treatment .............................................................................. 20 Conclusions and recommendations ........................................................... 24 References .................................................................................................23 Acknowledgements Thanks to all who contributed ideas and information to this paper – particularly Jessica Wilson and other colleagues at EMG, Victor Munnik, Shafick Hoossein and others. Thanks also to all who kindly agreed to be interviewed. This research was partially funded by Masibambane, and the printing of this paper was funded by HBS. EMG gratefully acknowledges the support of the Heinrich Böll Foundation and Masibambane for funding this research’. Executive Summary CLIMATE CHANGE IS HAPPENING
    [Show full text]
  • A PDF of Harvest Water in Rainwater Tanks
    ! Growing Edible Arizona Forests, An Illustrated Guide Excerpt from leafnetworkaz.org Edible Tree Guide CHOOSE Planting Site and Design Network • Rainwater Tanks Linking Edible Arizona Forests Rainwater Tanks Having made the most of passive water harvesting, consider collecting rainwater runoff from roofs into tanks to allow you to store rainwater for later use—a strategy sometimes called active water harvesting. Follow rainwater harvesting principles for tanks for efficient and safe design. Tanks can be placed above ground or underground, and range from 50 gallons to tens of thousands of gallons in capacity. Tanks are available in plastic, metal, fiberglass, concrete and other materials. If the water level in a tank is higher than the ground level of a tree-planting site you want to water, a valve or hose bib installed in the tank Metal tank is filled with rainfall runoff from a large roof through can allow delivery of tank water via gravity flow. an adjacent gutter and downspout. Water is conveyed down Install the tank tap ≥ 4 inches above the bottom of the wall and underground into the tank in a water-tight pipe. the tank to reduce disturbance of any sediment in Tank is tapped with a hose bib. A garden hose delivers water to a nearby landscape via gravity flow. The tank is positioned the bottom. You can attach a garden hose to away from the building to protect the foundation in case the distribute water to trees, or install a permanent tank leaks. pipe and rainwater faucet close to trees to make rainwater convenient to use.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainwater Harvesting BEST PRACTICES GUIDEBOOK
    GREEN BUILDING SERIES Rainwater Harvesting BEST PRACTICES GUIDEBOOK DEVELOPED FOR HOMEOWNERS of the REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NANAIMO British Columbia, Canada Residential Rainwater Harvesting Design and Installation REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NANAIMO — GREEN BUILDING BEST PRACTICES GUIDEBOOK SYMBOLS MESSAGE FROM THE CHAIR Special symbols throughout REGIONAL DISTRICT OF NANAIMO this guidebook highlight key information and will help you As one of the most desirable areas to live in Canada, the Regional District of Nanaimo to find your way. will continue to experience population growth. This growth, in turn, triggers increased demands on our resources. At the same time, residents of the region are extremely focused on protecting our water supplies, and are keen to see progressive and proactive HANDY CHECKLISTS approaches taken to manage water in a sustainable manner. The RDN is committed to protecting the Region’s watersheds through water conservation. Conservation will be accomplished by sharing knowledge and supporting innovative actions that achieve more efficient and sustainable water use. One such action is the harvesting of rainwater. EXTRA CARE & PRECAUTIONS Rainwater harvesting is the collection and storage of rainwater for potable and non- potable uses. With the right controls in place, harvested rainwater can be used for irrigation, outdoor cleaning, flushing toilets, washing clothes, and even drinking water. CONSULT A PROFESSIONAL Replacing municipally-treated water or groundwater with rainwater for these uses alleviates pressure on regional aquifers and sensitive ecosystems, and reduces demands on municipal infrastructure. Stored rainwater provides an ideal source of readily available water, particularly during the long dry summers or in locations facing declining REFER TO ANOTHER SECTION groundwater levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimizing Rainwater Harvesting Systems in Urban Areas
    Optimizing rainwater harvesting systems in urban areas. By María Violeta Vargas Parra A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the PhD degree in Environmental Science and Technology September 2015 The present doctoral thesis has been developed thanks to the project “Análisis ambiental del aprovechamiento de aguas pluviales” financed by Spanish Ministry for Science and Innovation, ref. CTM 2010-17365 as well as the pre-doctoral grant awarded to M. Violeta Vargas-Parra by Conacyt (National Council of Science and Technology, decentralized public agency of Mexico’s federal government). The present thesis entitled Optimizing rainwater harvesting systems in urban areas by María Violeta Vargas Parra has been carried out at the Institute of Environmental Science and Technology (ICTA) at Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB). M. Violeta Vargas Parra under the supervision of Dr. Xavier Gabarrell and Dr. Gara Villalba from ICTA and the Department of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering at the UAB, and Dr. María Rosa Rovira Val, from ICTA and the Business School at the UAB Dr. Xavier Gabarrell Dr. Gara Villalba Dr. M. Rosa Rovira Bellaterra (Cerdanyola del Vallès), September 2015. “I keep turning over new leaves, and spoiling them, as I used to spoil my copybooks; and I make so many beginnings there never will be an end. (Jo March)” - Louisa May Alcott, Little Woman V Table of Contents Acknowledgements.................................................................................. XI Summary ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Platin Underground Rainwater Tank Technical Guide SW 25
    Platin Underground Rainwater Tank Technical Guide SW 25 A superior underground rainwater tank that is easy to transport, handle and install. NK A T water IN A IN R at F PL RA SW25 G | STORMWATER STORMWATER | 05.20 Applications Ribbed construction for unbeatable Approvals/Standards stability and strength Ideal for the underground capture and Certified to AS/NZS 1546.1:2008 storage of rainwater Link tanks for increased capacity 15 year warranty, when installed according Quality Product Attributes to manufacturer’s guidelines ISO 9001:2008 Quality Tank, lid shaft and lid are all fully sealed Robust and lightweight HDPE construction Management Standard meaning no seepage or dirt can enter the Shallow dig for easy installation tank 50 year design life We are the supply partner of choice for New Zealand’s stormwater management and treatment solutions. A superior underground rainwater tank that is easy to transport, handle and install. Features ■ Lightweight, robust HDPE construction. ■ Easy transport due to low weight. ■ Secure investment thanks to 15-year warranty. ■ Specifically designed to be buried, and compliant with AS/NZS1546.1:2008. ■ Minimum installation depth means a short installation time and low installation costs. ■ Suitable for vehicle loading (in combination with a Telescopic dome shaft with cast iron lid). The Platin tank can therefore also be installed under your driveway. ■ Groundwater-stable up to the tank shoulder thanks to 2 extremely stable design. PG | ■ R Attractive tank lid that can be telescoped and tilted in a E continuously variable manner up to 5°. ■ Optional Integrated filter technology. STORMWAT | ■ Large tank dome for easy filter installation.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainwater Harvesting: a Lifeline for Human Well-Being
    3BJOXBUFSIBSWFTUJOHGPSBEBQUBUJPOUPDMJNBUFDIBOHF "GSJDBIBTTVSQMVTSBJOXBUFSGPS FOWJSPONFOU 5IFDIBMMFOHFJTFDPOPNJDBOEOPUQIZTJDBMXBUFSTDBSDJUZ Rainwater harvesting: a lifeline for human well-being 3BJOXBUFSPGGFSTUIF QPUFOUJBMUPTVQQMZ LNGPSUIF TVTUBJOBODFPG GPSFTUT XFUMBOETBOE HSBTTMBOETJO"GSJDB )BSWFTUJUUPDPQFXJUI DMJNBUFDIBOHF RAINWATER HARVESTING: A LIFELINE FOR HUMAN WELL-BEING A report prepared for UNEP by Stockholm Environment Institute Fist published by United Nations Environment Programme and Stockholm Environment Institute in 2009 Copyright© 2009, United Nations Environment Programme/SEI This publication may be reproduced in whole or in part and in any form for educational or non-profit purposes, without special permission from the copyright holder(s) provided acknowledgement of the source is made. The United Nations Environment Programme would appreciate receiving a copy of any publication that uses this publication as a source No use of this publication may be made for resale or other commercial purpose whatsoever without prior permission in writing from the United Nations Environment Programme. Application for such permission, with a statement of purpose and extent of production should be addressed to the Director, DCPI, P.O. Box 30552, Nairobi, 00100 Kenya. The designation employed and the presentation of material in this publi- cation do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the United Nations Environment Programme concerning the legal status of any country, territory or city or its authorities, or concerning the delimi- tation of its frontiers or boundaries. Mention of a commercial company or product in this publication does not imply endorsement by the United Nations Environment Programme. The use of information from this publication concerning proprietary products for publicity or advertising is not permitted. Layout: Richard Clay/SEI Cover photo: © ICRAF Rainwater Harvesting - UNEP ISBN: 978 - 92 - 807 - 3019 - 7 Job No.
    [Show full text]
  • Rainwater Harvesting for Non-Potable Use and Evidence of Risk Posed to Human Health
    Rainwater Harvesting for Non-potable Use and Evidence of Risk Posed to Human Health Sylvia Struck Introduction While collecting and storing rainwater for use is an ancient practice, there has been a resurgence in popularity with the promotion of green and sustainable building practices, such as Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED), and in areas where water insecurity or lack of municipal supply make it an attractive or necessary supplement or alternative. One of the features of LEED certification is assessing water efficiency, whereby points are granted; e.g., if the use of potable water is reduced or eliminated for activities such as landscape irrigation. A benefit of implementing rainwater collection is that the demand for potable water supplied from municipal sources can be reduced. In water stressed areas, homes and commercial buildings are often outfitted with roof collection systems to capture rainfall runoff that can be diverted to storage for later use. While rainwater harvesting is used for both potable and non-potable purposes, this paper will primarily focus on potential health risks of rainwater reuse for non-potable applications, namely: spray irrigation, use in fountains, toilet and urinal flushing). Also, while rainwater can be collected from other surfaces, such as courtyards, streets, and other impermeable surfaces, the focus is on roof- collected and therefore the discussion on contaminants will concentrate on those found primarily in roof-harvested rainwater. Initially, scholarly (peer-reviewed) journal articles with content relevant to Legionnaire’s disease and rainwater reuse were searched. The search was extended to consider rainwater reuse with respect to irrigation (or associated with spray), fountains, toilet and urinal flushing, and any health risks exposure, legionnaires, E.
    [Show full text]
  • (GHG) Emissions from Rainwater Harvesting Systems
    A Dissertation entitled Life Cycle Assessment of Rainwater Harvesting Systems at Building and Neighborhood Scales and for Various Climatic Regions of the U.S. by Jay P. Devkota Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Engineering Dr. Defne Apul, Committee Chair Dr. Steven Burian, Committee Member Dr. Ashok Kumar, Committee Member Dr. Cyndee Gruden, Committee Member Dr. Youngwoo Seo, Committee Member Dr. Patricia R. Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo December 2015 Copyright 2015, Jay P. Devkota This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of Life Cycle Assessment of Rainwater Harvesting Systems at Building and Neighborhood Scales and for Various Climatic Regions of the U.S. By Jay P. Devkota Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Doctor of Philosophy Degree in Civil Engineering The University of Toledo December 2015 Rainwater harvesting can be a strategy to address challenges with urban water and wastewater infrastructure such as leakage, underfunding energy usage and combined sewer overflow. Rainwater harvesting system has been used for centuries to meet urban water demands such as toilet flushing, lawn irrigation, cleaning and recreational activities. Of these uses of harvested rainwater, toilet flushing is more common as it constitutes a higher percentage of indoor water use. Life cycle assessment is becoming a powerful tool to estimate environmental sustainability of rainwater harvesting systems. With growing interest in rainwater harvesting systems, it is now essential to understand and estimate the factors affecting its environmental sustainability to better design the system as well as to provide a framework for future researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: a Planning and Design Guide
    LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT IN COASTAL SOUTH CAROLINA: A PLANNING AND DESIGN GUidE Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: A Planning and Design Guide This publication was made possible through support from the National Estuarine Research Reserve System Sci- ence Collaborative, a partnership of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the University of New Hampshire. The Science Collaborative advances the use of science in coastal decision making by engag- ing intended users of the science in the research process—from problem definition to practical application of results. Cover Photo credits: Kathryn Ellis, Kathryn Ellis, Seamon Whiteside + Associates, Erik Smith. Recommended Citation for this Guidebook: Ellis, K., C. Berg, D. Caraco, S. Drescher, G. Hoffmann, B. Keppler, M. LaRocco, and A.Turner. 2014. Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: A Planning and Design Guide. ACE Basin and North Inlet – Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserves, 462 pp. Download a digital copy of this document and the spreadsheet tools at http://www.northinlet.sc.edu/LID Low Impact Development in Coastal South Carolina: A Planning and Design Guide ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Project Team Sadie Drescher, Center for Watershed Protection Kathryn Ellis, EIT, North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve Greg Hoffmann, P.E., Center for Watershed Protection Blaik Keppler, SC Department of Natural Resources & ACE Basin National Estuarine Research Reserve April Turner, South Carolina Sea Grant Consortium Michelle LaRocco, North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve; University of South Carolina Wendy Allen, North Inlet-Winyah Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve; University of South Carolina Advisory Committee The Advisory Committee provided guidance and feedback on the content of this document, devel- oped and participated in workshops, and engaged stakeholders.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Stormwater Storage and Use
    2 Stormwater Storage and Use 2. Rainwater Storage Systems Figure 1. Rainwater tank components. (Coombes and Kuzcera 2001.) Background At the lot scale, rainwater storage tank systems are an effective way of capturing stormwater for non-potable use (such as garden watering, toilet flushing, in washing machines and for car washing) and therefore helping to conserve scheme drinking water supplies. There are increasingly innovative designs which hold rainwater in a range of forms including bags, fences, walls and roof gutters, with these systems designed for different uses, volumes and aesthetic requirements. Slimline plastic or metal tanks are increasingly popular in urban areas due to the unobtrusive form of the tanks adjacent to or beneath buildings. Rainwater storage systems can also be applied at a larger scale, for example high volume underground storage systems applied to capture runoff from paved or parking areas or the roofs of buildings. There are a number of new below-ground storage propriety devices that are designed for both roof water catchments and impervious surface catchments, such as hardstand areas. The storage systems are modular and their volumes can be anything from 5 kL to 5 ML. These devices have different filtration systems over the inlet for primary treatment and some have a secondary filter, depending on the quality of the runoff and the desired water use. A pump system returns the collected water to provide a non-potable supply for domestic, commercial, industrial and municipal buildings, such as sports centres and community halls. Collected stormwater could be used for irrigation, vehicle washing, art/water features, toilet flushing, cooling water systems and many other applications that currently use high grade potable water.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Mitigation Benefits of Rainwater Tanks
    Flood Mitigation Benefits of Rainwater Tanks S. A. Gato-Trinidad1, D. Alexander, 1 J. Barker1 and T. Postlewaithe 1Centre for Sustainable Infrastructure, Swinburne University of Technology, John Street, Hawthorn, Victoria 3122, Australia 1. INTRODUCTION Flood mitigation can be achieved through on-site detention methods which also offers associated economic, environmental and social benefits. The purpose of this paper was to assess the flood mitigation benefits and the associated environmental, social and economic benefits of decentralised tanks within each household. The paper focused on how much reduction in peak flood volumes and other associated benefits can be achieved from rainwater tanks when calculated at a lot-scale in an existing catchment. The catchment in study is Sutton Lakes within Knox City Council, Victoria, Australia where there are several storm water related issues, including the traditional inadequate piped storm water network and various water quality concerns within the lake system. Based on flooding and water quality computer modelling it was revealed that during the 5 year ARI storm there was a 12.6% reduction in pipe flows from the outlet of the system and a reduction of 1.7% in a 100- year ARI event. A reduction of 17% and 11% in overland flows for 5-year and 100-year ARI events respectively and a decrease of 18% in wetland area required were also achieved. 1.1. Background Many of the developed parts of Australia have suffered severe drought conditions for more than a decade which makes water as a precious commodity. Yet some Australian cities also suffer from flooding. The growing population and booming economy means increasing water demand and competing uses of water.
    [Show full text]