Richard Branson (Virgin Group)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Interim Results Announcement 2019
BASIS OF PRESENTATION CYBG PLC (the ‘Company’), together with its subsidiary undertakings (which together comprise the ‘Group’), operate under the Clydesdale Bank, Yorkshire Bank, B and Virgin Money brands. It offers a range of banking services for both retail and business customers through retail branches, business banking centres, direct and online channels, and brokers. This release covers the results of the Group for the six months ended 31 March 2019. Statutory basis: Statutory information is set out on pages 43 to 79. The IFRS 9 accounting standard replaced IAS 39 (‘Financial Instruments: Recognition and Measurement’), introducing changes to the classification and measurement of financial instruments and the impairment of financial assets. Virgin Money adopted IFRS 9 on 1 January 2018 and CYBG on 1 October 2018. Pro forma results: On 15 October 2018, the Company acquired all the voting rights in Virgin Money Holdings (UK) plc (Virgin Money) by means of a scheme of arrangement under Part 26 of the UK Companies Act 2006, with the transaction being accounted for as an acquisition of Virgin Money. We believe that it is helpful to also provide additional information which is more readily comparable with the historic results of the combined businesses. Therefore we have also prepared Pro forma results for the Group as if CYBG PLC and Virgin Money had always been a Combined Group, in order to assist in explaining trends in financial performance by showing a full 6 months performance for the Combined Group for both the current period and prior period, as well as a full 12 month performance of the Combined Group for the most recent year end results. -
Register of Lords' Interests
REGISTER OF LORDS’ INTERESTS _________________ The following Members of the House of Lords have registered relevant interests under the code of conduct: ABERDARE, LORD Category 8: Gifts, benefits and hospitality Attended with wife, Royal Opera House, Covent Garden, 25 July 2014, as guests of Welsh Government Category 10: Non-financial interests (a) Director, F.C.M. Limited (recording rights) Category 10: Non-financial interests (c) Trustee, Berlioz Society Trustee, St John Cymru-Wales Trustee, National Library of Wales Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Trustee, West Wycombe Charitable Trust ADAMS OF CRAIGIELEA, BARONESS Nil No registrable interests ADDINGTON, LORD Category 1: Directorships Chairman, Microlink PC (UK) Ltd (computing and software) Category 7: Overseas visits Visit to Dublin, 6-7 May 2015, to talk on UK Election at seminar organised by Goodbody and the British Irish Chamber of Commerce who paid for airfares, accommodation and hospitality Category 10: Non-financial interests (d) Vice President, British Dyslexia Association Category 10: Non-financial interests (e) Vice President, UK Sports Association Vice President, Lakenham Hewitt Rugby Club ADEBOWALE, LORD Category 1: Directorships Director, Leadership in Mind Ltd (business activities; certain income from services provided personally by the Member is or will be paid to this company or to TomahawkPro Ltd; see category 4(a)) Non-executive Director, Three Sixty Action Ltd (holding company; community development, media and IT) (see category 4(a)) Non-executive Director, TomahawkPro Ltd (a subsidiary of Three Sixty Action Ltd; collaborative software & IT innovation; no income from this post is received at present; certain income from services provided personally by the Member is or will be paid to this company or to Leadership in Mind Ltd; see category 4(a)) Category 2: Remunerated employment, office, profession etc. -
Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd V Sharman Networks Ltd [2006] FCAFC 41 (23 March 2006)
Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman Networks Ltd [2006] FCAFC 41 (23 March 2006) Last Updated: 23 March 2006 FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA Universal Music Australia Pty Ltd v Sharman Networks Ltd [2006] FCAFC 41 CONTEMPT OF COURT – question of law referred by primary judge to Full Court – question whether, ‘having regard to nature and terms of’ order alleged to have been disobeyed, a determination of contempt may be made in respect of the contraventions alleged in the statement of charge – order the subject of pending appeal – order must be obeyed until set aside – different possible meanings of ‘equivocal’ and ‘ambiguous’ in relation to orders in earlier cases on contempt – discussion of orders whose meaning is obscure as a matter of construction of their terms, and orders shown to be uncertain or ambiguous in their operation in the context of the facts proved by the evidence – referred question answered, Yes. Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 25(6) Federal Court Rules O 37 r 2 Australian Consolidated Press Ltd v Morgan (1965) 112 CLR 483 considered Coflexip SA v Stolt Comex Seaway MS Ltd [1999] FSR 473 cited Commodore Business Machines Pty Ltd v Trade Practices Commission (1990) 92 ALR 563 cited Commonwealth Industrial Gases Ltd v M.W.A. Holdings Pty Ltd (1970) 180 CLR 160 cited Iberian Trust Ltd v Founders Trust and Investment Co [1932] 2 KB 87 considered ICI Australia Operations Pty Limited v Trade Practices Commission (1992) 38 FCR 248 referred to Interlego A.G. v Toltoys Pty Ltd (1973) 130 CLR 461 cited Johnson v Walton -
Certified Pre-Schools in the United Arab Emirates
Investigating the Factors that may contribute to the Learning of Children at ISO Quality Certified and Non- Certified Pre-Schools in the United Arab Emirates التحقيق في العوامل التي يمكن أن تسهم في تعلم اﻷطفال في شهادة إسو المعتمدة وغير المعتمدة في مرحلة ما قبل المدرسة في اﻹمارات العربية المتحدة by VANDANA KUMAR GANDHI A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSPHY IN EDUCATION at The British University in Dubai Dr. Solomon Arulraj David September 2017 ii DECLARATION I warrant that the content of this research is the direct result of my own work and that any use made in it of published or unpublished copyright material falls within the limits permitted by international copyright conventions. I understand that a copy of my research will be deposited in the University Library for permanent retention. I hereby agree that the material mentioned above for which I am author and copyright holder may be copied and distributed by The British University in Dubai for the purposes of research, private study or education and that The British University in Dubai may recover from purchasers the costs incurred in such copying and distribution, where appropriate. I understand that The British University in Dubai may make a digital copy available in the institutional repository. I understand that I may apply to the University to retain the right to withhold or to restrict access to my thesis for a period which shall not normally exceed four calendar years from the congregation at which the degree is conferred, the length of the period to be specified in the application, together with the precise reasons for making that application. -
Who's Who in A&R at Virgin Records
WHO'S WHO IN A&R AT VIRGIN RECORDS INTRODUCTION In examining Virgin Records as it relates to America, it must be noted that there are basically two operations, Virgin-United States and Virgin-International. The former is managed by Charles Dimont. The latter operation falls under the jurisdiction of Simon Draper and is based in London. Virgin-U.S., based in New York, is primarily a filter and servicing office for the larger International operation. Charles notes that the U.S. releases include approximately 20 acts, although International maintains some 30 groups. In discussing the composition of the roster and current trends, Charles emphasizes that, "we want to give the label shape and balance." He sees too many bands playing formula music whereas Virgin is seeking a different, original sound. Although the label is looking for such a balance, Dimont interjects that, "we would not feel comfortable signing an r&b act or a singer-songwriter." While International has some 4-5 reggae acts and an a&r executive to oversee that department, Dimont says that, "there is no indication as yet that reggae will happen in the U.S., 'New Wave' is in fashion," but he regards pop as a marketable and pro- grammable style. In terms of his own roster, Charles points out that, "our acts are not necessarily pro- grammable or sellable, but all are class — on the frontier of commerciality." In regard to unsolicited tapes, Dimont stresses that because there is no formal a&r situation in New York, they all listen. Virgin-U.S. -
Mediametrie 126 000 Radio Ile De France Survey
PRESS RELEASE Levallois, 25th April 2019 MEDIAMETRIE 126 000 RADIO ILE DE FRANCE SURVEY Radio Audience in France: January-March 2019 Mediametrie publishes radio audience results, in metropolitan France over the December 31 to March 31 2019 period, measured on a population of 3,931 individuals aged of 13 years and over. The audience results focus on the “Monday-Friday” time base created by excluding Low Activity Days (LAD), days for which the activity rate is less than 55%. Over the previous period of January to March 2018, 3 LAD were identified : Monday December 31, Tuesday January 1st, Wednesday January 2. Characteristics of the period during the week (Monday-Friday) September – January – March January- March December 2019 2019 2018 Number of weekdays of the wave (including LADs) 65 80 65 Number of Low Activity Days 3 2 3 Number of school holidays 15 10 15 Activity rate excluding LADs (in %) (1) 75.0 75.7 75.2 1) Activity rate: share of employed individuals having carried out their professional activity on the same day as the interview. Radio Audience, population aged of 13 years and over (Monday-Friday) January – March 2019 September – December 2018 January- March 2018 TSL AQH AQH Cume Cume TSL AQH AQH Cume Cume TSL AQH AQH Cume Cume h/m % 000 % 000 h/mn % 000 % 000 h/mn % 000 % 000 n 5h - 24h 10.0 1.002 74.1 7.470 2h33 9.9 1.000 71.4 7.188 2h39 10.4 1.052 75.0 7.549 2h39 7h - 9h 20.2 2.032 42.0 4.228 0h58 20.7 2.089 42.2 4.247 0h59 20.1 2.026 41.7 4 201 0h58 This press release presents the intermediate results of audience in Ile-de-France, published over the first 8 weeks of reference period September-December, 2018. -
Virgin Radio's Thousand Dollar Thursdays CONTEST
Virgin Radio’s Thousand Dollar Thursdays CONTEST OFFICIAL RULES AND REGULATIONS (the “Rules”) 1. The 94.5 Virgin Radio’s Thousand Dollar Thursdays contest (the “Contest”) starts at 6:00 a.m. Pacific Standard Time (“PST”) on October 8, 2020 and closes at approximately 5:59 p.m. PST on October 29, 2020. No purchase necessary. Void where prohibited. 2. The Contest sponsor is 94.5 Virgin Radio, a division of Bell Media Inc. (hereinafter referred to as the “Contest Sponsor”). 3. To enter the Contest to be eligible to win, entrant must be a legal resident of British Columbia, Canada and be nineteen (19) years of age or older. Employees of Bell Media Inc., its agents, parent, affiliated or related companies, subsidiaries, divisions prize sponsors, promotional and advertising agencies or of any other entity involved in the development, production, administration, or fulfillment of the Contest, as well as the parents, siblings and children of any such employees and any person domiciled with such employees, are ineligible to enter. A winner of a previous Bell Media Radio Vancouver Station contest (this includes any contest on CFBT-FM, CHQM-FM, CKST-AM and CFTE-AM) within the thirty (30) days preceding the winner selection date for this Contest (including persons designated by such winners to participate in the prizes and persons domiciled with a winner) are not eligible to enter or to be selected for a prize and may be disqualified. 4. TO ENTER the Contest, an announcement will be made every hour each Thursday of the Contest Period between 6:00 a.m. -
Virgin Mobile Holdings (Uk)
A copy of this document, comprising listing particulars relating to Virgin Mobile Holdings (UK) plc (the Company) prepared solely in connection with the proposed offer to certain institutional and professional investors (the Global Offer) of ordinary shares (the Ordinary Shares) in the Company in accordance with the Listing Rules made under section 74 of the Financial Services and Markets Act 2000 (FSMA), has been delivered for registration to the Registrar of Companies in England and Wales pursuant to section 83 of FSMA. Application has been made to the UK Listing Authority for the ordinary share capital of Virgin Mobile Holdings (UK) plc to be admitted to the Official List of the UK Listing Authority and to the London Stock Exchange for such share capital to be admitted to trading on the London Stock Exchange’s market for listed securities. It is expected that admission to listing and trading will become effective and that unconditional dealings will commence at 8.00 a.m. on 26 July 2004. All dealings in Ordinary Shares prior to the commencement of unconditional dealings will be on a ‘‘when issued’’ basis and of no effect if Admission does not take place and will be at the sole risk of the parties concerned. The Directors of Virgin Mobile Holdings (UK) plc, whose names appear on page 8 of this document, accept responsibility for the information contained in this document. To the best of the knowledge and belief of the Directors (who have taken all reasonable care to ensure that such is the case), the information contained in this document is in accordance with the facts and does not omit anything likely to affect the import of such information. -
Stations Monitored
Stations Monitored 10/01/2019 Format Call Letters Market Station Name Adult Contemporary WHBC-FM AKRON, OH MIX 94.1 Adult Contemporary WKDD-FM AKRON, OH 98.1 WKDD Adult Contemporary WRVE-FM ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY 99.5 THE RIVER Adult Contemporary WYJB-FM ALBANY-SCHENECTADY-TROY, NY B95.5 Adult Contemporary KDRF-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 103.3 eD FM Adult Contemporary KMGA-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 99.5 MAGIC FM Adult Contemporary KPEK-FM ALBUQUERQUE, NM 100.3 THE PEAK Adult Contemporary WLEV-FM ALLENTOWN-BETHLEHEM, PA 100.7 WLEV Adult Contemporary KMVN-FM ANCHORAGE, AK MOViN 105.7 Adult Contemporary KMXS-FM ANCHORAGE, AK MIX 103.1 Adult Contemporary WOXL-FS ASHEVILLE, NC MIX 96.5 Adult Contemporary WSB-FM ATLANTA, GA B98.5 Adult Contemporary WSTR-FM ATLANTA, GA STAR 94.1 Adult Contemporary WFPG-FM ATLANTIC CITY-CAPE MAY, NJ LITE ROCK 96.9 Adult Contemporary WSJO-FM ATLANTIC CITY-CAPE MAY, NJ SOJO 104.9 Adult Contemporary KAMX-FM AUSTIN, TX MIX 94.7 Adult Contemporary KBPA-FM AUSTIN, TX 103.5 BOB FM Adult Contemporary KKMJ-FM AUSTIN, TX MAJIC 95.5 Adult Contemporary WLIF-FM BALTIMORE, MD TODAY'S 101.9 Adult Contemporary WQSR-FM BALTIMORE, MD 102.7 JACK FM Adult Contemporary WWMX-FM BALTIMORE, MD MIX 106.5 Adult Contemporary KRVE-FM BATON ROUGE, LA 96.1 THE RIVER Adult Contemporary WMJY-FS BILOXI-GULFPORT-PASCAGOULA, MS MAGIC 93.7 Adult Contemporary WMJJ-FM BIRMINGHAM, AL MAGIC 96 Adult Contemporary KCIX-FM BOISE, ID MIX 106 Adult Contemporary KXLT-FM BOISE, ID LITE 107.9 Adult Contemporary WMJX-FM BOSTON, MA MAGIC 106.7 Adult Contemporary WWBX-FM -
Case Fifteen
AGFC15 16/12/2004 17:16 Page 120 case fifteen Richard Branson and the Virgin Group of Companies in 2004 TEACHING NOTE SYNOPSIS By 2004, Richard Branson’s business empire extended from airlines and railways to financial services and mobile telephone services. There was little evidence of any slow- ing up of the pace of new business startups. In the first 4 years of the new century, Virgin had founded a new airline in Australia; retail ventures in Singapore and Thailand; wireless telecom companies in Asia, the US, and Australia; and a wide variety of online retailing. While several of these new ventures had been very successful (the Australian airline Virgin Blue and Virgin Mobile in particular), the financial health of several other Virgin companies was looking precarious. Several of Branson’s startups had been financial disasters – Virgin Cola and Victory Corporation in par- ticular. Other more established members of the Virgin group (such as Virgin Rail and Virgin Atlantic) required substantial investment, while yielding disappointing operating earnings. While Branson’s enthusiasm for supporting new business ideas and launching companies that would challenge business orthodoxy and seek new approaches to meeting customer needs seemed to be undiminished, skeptics sug- gested that the Virgin brand had become overextended and that Branson was losing his golden touch. The case outlines the development of the Virgin group of companies from Branson’s first business venture and offers insight into the nature of Branson’s leadership, the This note was prepared by Robert M. Grant. 120 AGFC15 16/12/2004 17:16 Page 121 RICHARD BRANSON AND THE VIRGIN GROUP OF COMPANIES IN 2004 121 management principles upon which the Virgin companies are launched and operated, and the way in which the group is run. -
Scientific Journal of Business & Innovation
Volume 1 Issue 1 · January–June 2021 Scientific Journal of Business & Innovation ISSN 2749-6899 iii Table of Contents Editor-in-Chief iv Editorial Prof. Dr. Kyriakos Kouveliotis v Journal Information vi About BSBI Associate Editors 01 Commercial Importanceof a Freshwater Dr. Elham Shirvani Prawn, Macrobrachium Lamarrei: Dr. Maryam Mansuri a Case Study in Its Food Security Aspects 05 Sentiment Analysis of YouTube Video Honorary Senior Advisory Editor Comments Using Big Data: Prof. Dr. Emidia Vagnoni, Helping a Video Go Viral University of Ferrara Italy 09 Embodied Cognition and Subject Roles in the History of Philosophy Editorial Board 13 Relationship Between Investments Prof. Dr. Kyriakos Kouveliotis in Intellectual Capital and Financial Dr. Anastasios Fountis Performance: Evidence from Serbian Hotel Dr. Elham Shirvani Industry 2013–2017 Dr. Maryam Mansuri 21 Direction in Global Market Coping Dr. Anastasia Alevriadou Strategies: Virgin Airlines Case Study Dr. Milos Petkovic 31 A Case Study on Successful Implementation Dr. (MD) Ahmed ElBarawi of Ethics and Responsible Business Dr. Moumita Mukherjee Policies at a Corporate Level Dr. Desislava Valerieva Dimitrova 35 The Status of Sustainable Health Dr. Vivek Arunachalam Governance and Future Role of Eco-Tourism Dr. Christos Lemonakis Model for Eradicating Ex-Ante Child Health Dr. Marios Menexiadis Poverty in Riverine West Bengal, India Dr. Chaditsa Poulatova 43 Will Dexit Follow the Brexit and the Ms. Mina Shokri Consequences of the German Economy Ms. Katherine Boxall and European Union Mr. Anuj Batta 47 PR Watches — Innovative Solution Ms. Zoi Kerou in Alzheimer’s Care Mr. Konstantinos Skamagkas 51 Digital Marketing Campaign for Adidas Ms. Kathrin Bremer to Increase Customer Lifetime Value Ms. -
VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., Et Al., Plaintiffs, V
VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. JOHN DOES 1-35, Defendants. Civil Action No. 05-1918 (CKK) UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA 2006 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20652 April 18, 2006, Decided April 18, 2006, Filed COUNSEL: [*1] VIRGIN RECORDS AMERICA INC., ARISTA RECORDS LLC, CAPITOL RECORDS INC, SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, BMG MUSIC, WARNER BROS. RECORDS INC., PRIORITY RECORDS LLC, UMG RECORDINGS INC, ELEKTRA ENTERTAINMENT GROUP INC., MOTOWN RECORD COMPANY, L.P., FONOVISA, INC., INTERSCOPE RECORDS, LOUD RECORDS LLC, MAVERICK RECORDING COMPANY, LONDON-SIRE RECORDS INC., Plaintiffs: Matthew Jan Oppenheim, Potomac, MD. JUDGES: COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge. OPINIONBY: COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY OPINION: MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiffs Virgin Records America, Inc.; Arista Records LLC; Capitol Records, Inc.; Sony BMG Music Entertainment; Atlantic Recording Corporation; BMG Music; Warner Bros. Records Inc.; Priority Records LLC; UMG Recordings, Inc.; Elektra Entertainment Group, Inc.; Motown Record Company, L. P.; Fonovisa, Inc.; Interscope Records; Loud Records, LLC; Maverick Recording Company; and London-Sire Records Inc. (collectively, "Plaintiffs") brought this action alleging copyright infringement against John Doe Defendants #1-35 arising out of internet file sharing of digital sound recordings on September 29, 2005. Currently before the Court is Defendant Doe #18's [*2] Motion to Quash the subpoena issued to Defendant's ISP, Verizon, regarding Defendant's IP address, 162.84.109.12, on the grounds that this Court lacks personal jurisdiction over Defendant, who is a resident of Fredericksburg, Virginia, with allegedly little or no contact with the District of Columbia. See Def.'s Mot.