DOCSLIB.ORG

Index to Compilation of Speeches Delivered by the Hon. J J Spigelman, AC, Chief Justice of NSW in 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Index to Compilation of Speeches Delivered by the Hon. J J Spigelman, AC, Chief Justice of NSW in 2002 Index to compilation of speeches delivered by the Hon. J J Spigelman, AC, Chief Justice of NSW in 2002 Page number Date speech Description reference within delivered pdf compilation Foundations of the freedom of the press in 20 November 2002 Australia - The Inaugural Australian Press Page 2 of 194 Council address Re-dedication of the honour roll in the original 11 November 2002 Page 18 of 194 Supreme Court building Address upon the occasion of the retirement of 8 November 2002 Page 20 of 194 the Honourable Mr Justice Philip Powell AM Are Lawyers Lemons? Competition Principles 29 October 2002 Page 24 of 194 and Professional Regulation 12 October 2002 The Idea of a University Page 41 of 194 8 October 2002 Becket and Henry II: Exile Page 44 of 194 Convergence and the Judicial Role: Recent Developments in China - Address to the XVIth 16 July 2002 Page 68 of 194 Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law Convergence and the Judicial Role: Recent 11 July 2002 Developments in China - Address to the China Page 91 of 194 Education Centre, University of Sydney June 2002 Guide to Judicial Conduct Page 113 of 194 17 May 2002 The Maintenance of Institutional Values Page 155 of 194 Negligence: The Last Outpost of the Welfare 27 April 2002 Page 162 of 194 State Negligence: The Last Outpost of the Welfare 27 April 2002 Page 164 of 194 State (Summary) Formal Opening Ceremony Court of Criminal 8 February 2002 Page 180 of 194 Appeal at Dubbo 29 January 2002 Opening to Law Term Dinner 2002 Page 186 of 194 Foreward to G Lindsay, No Mere Mouthpiece: 2002 Servants of All Yet of None, Chatswood, Page 191 of 194 LexisNexis Butterworths, 2002 Foreward to J Anderson, J Hunter and N Williams, The New Evidence Law: Annotations 2002 Page 193 of 194 and Commentary on the Uniform Evidence Acts, Sydney, LexisNexis 2002 Foundations of the Freedom of the Press in Australia - The Inaugural Australian Press ... Page 1 of 16 Print Page Close Window Foundations of the Freedom of the Press in Australia - The Inaugural Australian Press Council Address FOUNDATIONS OF THE FREEDOM OF THE PRESS IN AUSTRALIA THE INAUGURAL AUSTRALIAN PRESS COUNCIL ADDRESS THE HONOURABLE J J SPIGELMAN AC CHIEF JUSTICE OF NEW SOUTH WALES BANCO COURT, SUPREME COURT OF NEW SOUTH WALES SYDNEY, 20 NOVEMBER 2002 On the evening of 20 September 1826, two privates in the 57th Regiment stationed in Sydney, Joseph Sudds and Patrick Thompson, stole some calico from a shop in York Street, around the corner from their barracks situated at what is now Wynyard Square. They expected to be caught and sentenced to transportation, which appeared to them to be preferable to the rigours of military discipline. Lieutenant General Ralph Darling, Governor of New South Wales – or, as his commission described his office, Captain General and Governor in Chief – concerned with the maintenance of the discipline of his force over this and similar incidents, including a soldier’s self-mutilation with a view to discharge, determined to make an example of Sudds and Thompson. Such behaviour reinforced Darling’s opinion, also prevalent in London, that transportation to Australia had lost its deterrent effect and its role as punishment. Darling set aside the two soldiers’ convictions and sentences by a Court of Quarter Sessions, which had ordered them to be transported to a penal settlement for seven years, and directed that they would serve on a chain gang on the public roads of the State for the entire period of their sentence and thereafter would return to their corps. At 11.00 am on Wednesday 22 November 1826, the two prisoners were brought before the garrison assembled on the parade ground of the barracks. They were stripped naked, dressed in the yellow and grey clothes of a convict and each was then encased in a specially designed set of chains with an iron collar with spikes that prevented lying down and wrist and leg manacles, weighing some fourteen pounds in total. Thus burdened they shuffled from the parade ground with four drummers beating out the Rogues March . Perhaps nothing more would have been heard of this affair but for one unfortunate circumstance. Sudds was critically ill, to the knowledge of his wardens but unknown to Darling. He died five days later on 27 November 1826 [1]. Darling had a public relations crisis on his hands. An incident of this character could permanently damage his career, as he well knew, and as testified by both the volume and obsequious content of his correspondence with London on the subject. One source of hostile information for his superiors in London was the strident reportage and exploitation of the incident by the then new independent newspapers of the colony. Only three years before William Charles Wentworth and Robert Wardell, the first two barristers admitted as such by the Supreme Court of New South Wales, had commenced publication of the Australian, which joined the official Sydney Gazette. A year later the Monitor began publication under the direction of Edward Smith Hall. Wardell was a highly competent barrister, who had been passed over for Saxe Bannister as Attorney- General. If Darling had had him as principal law officer, the history I am about to recount would probably have never happened. Wentworth, locally born, and already emerging as the leader of the emancipists, had met Wardell in London in 1819 where Wardell was already an editor, of the Statesman evening newspaper. They travelled to Australia together in 1824, accompanied by a printing press. Their approach was clearly stated in their first editorial: http://infolink/lawlink/supreme_court/ll_sc.nsf/vwPrint1/SCO_speech_spigelman_20 ... 23/03/2012 Foundations of the Freedom of the Press in Australia - The Inaugural Australian Press ... Page 2 of 16 “A free press is the most legitimate, and, at the same time, the most powerful weapon that can be employed to annihilate influence, frustrate the designs of tyranny, and restrain the arm of oppression [2].” Governor Darling regarded Wentworth as “a vulgar ill-bred fellow, utterly unconscious of the common civilities, due from one Gentleman to another [3].” The very title – the Australian – proclaimed Wentworth’s political program. Edward Smith Hall at the Monitor deployed different terminology. He denounced the community which would not stand up for their rights as “a poor grovelling race … they are no longer Britons but Australians ” and spoke of them “degenerating into Australians [4]”. Hall was a failed farmer, the first cashier of the Bank of New South Wales, a founder of the Benevolent Society of New South Wales and of the local branch of the British and Foreign Bible Society. He had come to Australia as a lay missionary – “an apostate missionary”, Governor Darling would call him – with a radical’s faith in the perfectibility of Man, undiminished by the experience of the French Revolution - Hall applied his evangelical zeal to everything he did or wrote, never pausing at the border between zeal and self-righteousness. The day Sudds died, the Australian commenced its coverage with a blistering attack on the Governor, the system that permitted action of this character to occur and raised serious doubts about the legality of the Governor’s conduct. The Monitor, which had long campaigned against the brutality of the treatment of convicts [5], also took up the cause. Plainly shaken by the course of events, and by the allegations, Darling belatedly sought legal advice, including an advisory opinion from the Supreme Court, then only two and a half years old. In a joint opinion, Sir Francis Forbes and Justice Stephen ruled against the Governor. Darling had in effect set aside a sentence and imposed a new sentence by executive fiat. This was the assumption of a judicial role. The Governor purported to act under a statutory power, but Forbes and Stephen concluded that that power permitted the Governor to interfere only by reason of conduct subsequent to the sentence of transportation taking effect [6]. The underlying basis of their opinion was the assertion of a clear separation of functions between the judiciary, which imposes sentences, and the exercise of executive authority after a sentence takes effect, pursuant to a statutory power for a specific purpose. It was the clearest possible assertion of the application of the rule of the law to the colony and of the independence of the judiciary. The strength of Sir Francis Forbes’ convictions on the fundamental significance of these principles had already been manifest in his previous post as Chief Justice of Newfoundland where he had come into conflict with the military Governor of that colony by declaring invalid a range of regulations [7]. Forbes’ strength of character is manifest in the fact that, in neither position, did he have the protection of security of tenure available to the English judiciary since the Act of Settlement of 1701. The media attack on Darling in the wake of the death of Sudds elevated the injustice of the incident to a symbol of the injustices perpetrated on the residents of New South Wales by reason of the absence of any form of involvement in the legislative process and the absence of trial by jury. There was provision for juries at the time, but such juries, far from being constituted by peers of an accused, were constituted by seven military officers who sat in uniform. Until this point of time, Darling had allowed the media to develop without interference from the executive. Indeed only shortly before the Sudds Thompson incident, he had refused an application by the head of the Anglican Church, Archdeacon Thomas Scott and the leader of the exclusives, Mr John Macarthur, to direct the Attorney General to prosecute the papers for attacks upon them.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • High Court of Australia
    HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA ANNUAL REPORT 2000-01 High Court of Australia Canberra ACT 7 December 2001 Dear Attorney, In accordance with Section 47 of the High Court of Australia Act 1979, I submit on behalf of the Court and with its approval a report relating to the administration of the affairs of the High Court of Australia under Section 17 of the Act for the year ended 30 June 2001, together with financial statements in respect of the year in the form approved by the Minister for Finance. Sub-section 47(3) of the Act requires you to cause a copy of this report to be laid before each House of Parliament within 15 sitting days of that House after its receipt by you. Yours sincerely, (C.M. DOOGAN) Chief Executive and Principal Registrar of the High Court of Australia The Honourable D. Williams, AM, QC, MP Attorney-General Parliament House Canberra ACT 2600 CONTENTS Page PART I - PREAMBLE Aids to Access 4 PART II - INTRODUCTION Chief Justice Gleeson 5 Justice Gaudron 5 Justice McHugh 6 Justice Gummow 6 Justice Kirby 6 Justice Hayne 7 Justice Callinan 7 PART III - THE YEAR IN REVIEW Changes in Proceedings 8 Self Represented Litigants 8 The Court and the Public 8 Developments in Information Technology 8 Links and Visits 8 PART IV - BACKGROUND INFORMATION Establishment 9 Functions and Powers 9 Sittings of the Court 9 Seat of the Court 11 Appointment of Justices of the High Court 12 Composition of the Court 12 Former Chief Justices and Justices of the Court 13 PART V - ADMINISTRATION General 14 External Scrutiny 14 Ecologically Sustainable Development
    [Show full text]
  • Catholic Resistance to German State Persecution: Lessons for Modern Australia
    Catholic Resistance to German State Persecution: Lessons for Modern Australia The Hon. Dyson Heydon AC QC The 2014 Annual Acton Lecture delivered on 10 April 2014 at Banco Court, Supreme Court of NSW CIS Occasional Paper 134 2014 Published June 2014 by The Centre for Independent Studies Limited PO Box 92, St Leonards, NSW, 1590 Email: [email protected] Website: www.cis.org.au Views expressed in the publications of The Centre for Independent Studies are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Centre’s staff, advisers, directors, or officers. National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication Data: ©2014 The Centre for Independent Studies Design by Ryan Acosta Copy edited by Mangai Pitchai Cover images source: deutschemark.tumblr.com Introduction Peter Kurti ood evening, ladies and gentlemen—it’s a pleasure for me to welcome you to the Banco Court in the Supreme Court of NSW and to the 2014 Acton Lecture presented by GThe Centre for Independent Studies. We are most grateful to His Honour the Chief Justice for granting us permission to use the court this evening. I’m Peter Kurti, a Research Fellow at the CIS, and I coordinate the Religion and Free Society program at the Centre, the program within which the annual Acton Lecture takes place. The Religion and the Free Society program at the CIS reflects upon questions of religious freedom in Australia and overseas. It is, I think, quite a remarkable thing for a secular think tank such as the CIS to include within its scope a program such as Religion and the Free Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Turner Freeman Lawyers Australian Manufacturing Workers' Union Amalgamation Anniversary Dinner, Sydney Present at the Creatio
    2661 TURNER FREEMAN LAWYERS AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING WORKERS’ UNION AMALGAMATION ANNIVERSARY DINNER, SYDNEY PRESENT AT THE CREATION – THE STRANGE, EVENTFUL BIRTH OF THE AMWU 8 NOVEMBER 2012 The Honourable Michael Kirby AC CMG TURNER FREEMAN LAWYERS AUSTRALIAN MANUFACTURING WORKERS’ UNION AMALGAMATION ANNIVERSARY DINNER, SYDNEY 8 NOVEMBER 2012 PRESENT AT THE CREATION: THE STRANGE EVENTFUL BIRTH OF THE AMWU* THE HON. MICHAEL KIRBY AC CMG** ABSTRACT The author was one of the counsel who assisted in achieving the amalgamation of the three industrial organisations of employees that formed the AMWU in 1972. In this article, based on address to a dinner celebrating the 40th anniversary of this event, he describes the hard fought battles that proceeded amalgamation, including contested proceedings before the High Court of Australia in ex parte Bevan (1972) 172 CLR 1; the Commonwealth Industrial Court in Drinkwater v Amos (1972) 20 FLR 359; and the Arbitration Commission. From these experiences he derives lessons about the role of courts and tribunals in industrial relations; the role of well targeted industrial advocacy; the advantages of the old system of conciliation and arbitration; and the need to simplify the system of amalgamation. He also reflects on the idealistic quality of union leadership in 1972 and contrasts this with some cases today. The history of Australia is intertwined with the history of the labour movement. The great maritime strikes of the 1890s led to co-operation amongst the industrial unions in the several Australian colonies. That co-operation focused attention upon the need to develop a new province of law to supplement the imperfections of the common law and the defects of collective bargaining1.
    [Show full text]
  • Forbes Flyerflyer
    ForbesForbes FlyerFlyer THE NEWSLETTER OF THE FRANCIS FORBES SOCIETY FOR AUSTRALIAN LEGAL HISTORY ISSUE 7 • DECEMBER 2004 History reports itself The Lives of While the year may be rapidly drawing to a close, there Australian is still much activity happening on the publishing front. Chief Justices Following on from the successful third annual Forbes Society lecture, the Forbes Society in conjunction with the Council of Law Reporting for New South Wales will Dr John Bennett continues his remarkable project, publish Dowling's Select Cases, as edited by Tim Castle Lives of Australian Chief Justices with the publication and Bruce Kercher. Chief Justice Spigelman AC will of Sir Henry Wrenfordsley: Second Chief Justice of supply the foreword. Details as to the release of this Western Australia 1880-1883. publication will be available in the New Year. This issue of the Forbes Flyer contains an extract A further development in legal history is the Macquarie discussing Sir Henry Wrenfordsley's appointment Law Monographs: Studies in Law and History, to be as second Chief Justice of Western Australia. edited by Dr Andrew Buck of Macquarie University, and published by Australian Scholarly Publishing. The first In Professor Roy M. Mersky's words (in the Foreword title in the series will be The Poor Man by A.R. Buck and to the book): Nancy E. Wright, and will be available in March 2005. If the life of the law has not been logic, but Dr Buck has advised that the monographs will focus on rather experience, then judicial biography has topics such as legal biographies and the historical a great deal to tell us about the law, and in development of substantive law.
    [Show full text]
  • Judges and Retirement Ages
    JUDGES AND RETIREMENT AGES ALYSIA B LACKHAM* All Commonwealth, state and territory judges in Australia are subject to mandatory retirement ages. While the 1977 referendum, which introduced judicial retirement ages for the Australian federal judiciary, commanded broad public support, this article argues that the aims of judicial retirement ages are no longer valid in a modern society. Judicial retirement ages may be causing undue expense to the public purse and depriving the judiciary of skilled adjudicators. They are also contrary to contemporary notions of age equality. Therefore, demographic change warrants a reconsideration of s 72 of the Constitution and other statutes setting judicial retirement ages. This article sets out three alternatives to the current system of judicial retirement ages. It concludes that the best option is to remove age-based limitations on judicial tenure. CONTENTS I Introduction .............................................................................................................. 739 II Judicial Retirement Ages in Australia ................................................................... 740 A Federal Judiciary .......................................................................................... 740 B Australian States and Territories ............................................................... 745 III Criticism of Judicial Retirement Ages ................................................................... 752 A Critiques of Arguments in Favour of Retirement Ages ........................
    [Show full text]
  • As Time Goes by a Speech Delivered by the Hon T E F Hughes AO QC to the Justices of the Supreme Court at the Opening of the 2006 Law Term
    LEGAL HISTORY As time goes by A speech delivered by the Hon T E F Hughes AO QC to the justices of the Supreme Court at the opening of the 2006 law term. Chief justice, you have asked me to of Appeal was established in 1966, Jack Slattery, his associate, (this was my speak about judges of this court before he was offended by the figurative first meeting with him) conducted me whom I have appeared. I am honoured separation of sheep and goats that the into the interview room. Any tendency by the invitation and thank you for it. new system entailed. He was not alone. on my part to be overawed by the I have decided that I must observe some There was a substantial schism which occasion was dispelled by the cordiality self-imposed ground-rules. They are: took time to heal. Some of the non- of the interviewers. anointed were heard to refer to a ◆ (with two exceptions) to say nothing However, cordiality to strangers was not particular member of the anointed as about the living; and a characteristic of Sir Frederick. He did ‘King Rat’. But Macfarlan was not given not exude warmth or geniality in ◆ to disregard the injunction de mortuis to name-calling. public; he was known as Frigidaire nihil nisi bonum so far as may be I had but one conversation with Jordan. Freddy; he could be mordant, as when necessary in the interests of candour. It was not a forensic occasion. At the in giving judgement in a divorce appeal, To look back 57 years, to 11 February end of the Second World War, I applied he described the respondent and co- 1949, the date of my admission to the unsuccessfully for one of two Rhodes respondent as having committed Bar, is a long retrospect.
    [Show full text]
  • SIR WILLIAM DENISON Papers, 1846-64 Reels M606-607, M671
    AUSTRALIAN JOINT COPYING PROJECT SIR WILLIAM DENISON Papers, 1846-64 Reels M606-607, M671 Col. W.M.W. Denison Newark Nottinghamshire National Library of Australia State Library of New South Wales Filmed: 1960 BIOGRAPHICAL NOTE William Thomas Denison (1804-1871) was born in London and attended Eton and the Royal Military College. He graduated in 1826 as a lieutenant in the Royal Engineers. He served in Canada and later worked on harbour defences in southern England. In 1838 he married Caroline Hornby and they had six sons and four daughters. He was promoted to the rank of captain in 1841. In 1846, following the dismissal of Sir John Eardley-Wilmot, he was appointed Lieutenant-Governor of Van Diemen’s Land. He was knighted in the same year and awarded a KCB in 1856. He arrived in the colony in January 1847 and held the office for eight years. A strong supporter of the continuance of convict transportation, he clashed with the nominated Legislative Council and two of the judges. The publication of some of his despatches, criticising the colonists generally, added to his unpopularity. His powers were reduced following the creation of an elected Legislative Council in 1850 and, with the cessation of transportation, his later years in Tasmania were more harmonious. In January 1855 Denison was appointed Governor of New South Wales and was given the additional title of ‘Governor-General of Australia’. Prompted by the Crimean War, he immediately reorganised the defences of Sydney Harbour. He presided over the introduction of responsible government in the colony in 1856 and had to deal with considerable political instability, with three ministries formed in the first year.
    [Show full text]
  • Hit and Myth in the Law Courts
    Dinner Address Hit and Myth in the Law Courts S E K Hulme, AM, QC Copyright 1994 by The Samuel Griffith Society. All rights reserved. Not unexpectedly, in this company, I will talk tonight about only one court; the one on your left as you cross the bridge over the lake. I want to do two things. I want firstly to consider a belief and a practice and a proposal concerning the High Court, in terms of the Court as it is, rather than in terms of the Court as it was. In doing that I want to say something of who used to come to the Court, and how; and who come to the Court now, and how. And secondly I want to share with you some reflections on statements made in recent months by the Chief Justice of the High Court. Where High Court Judges Come From, and Certain Implications of That I turn to the belief and the practice and the proposal I mentioned. I remind you of three things. The first is that one still finds supposedly intelligent commentators making disapproving references to the practical monopoly which the practising Bar has over appointments to the High Court, and suggesting that the field of appointees ought to be extended to include solicitors and academics. The second is that, in line with the constitutional principle that a judge ought to have nothing to fear and nothing to hope for from the government which appointed him, there long existed a general practice of not promoting judges, within a system of courts run by the same government, either from court to court, or within a court, as by promotion to Chief Justice.
    [Show full text]
  • 2300-Forbes Flyer DEC03-5
    ForbesForbes FlyerFlyer THE NEWSLETTER OF THE FRANCIS FORBES SOCIETY FOR AUSTRALIAN LEGAL HISTORY ISSUE 3 DECEMBER 2003 History reports itself Making History It is a curious aspect of contemporary culture that the Australian Investigating the South public venerate their sporting heroes and pop idols with such Australian Independent Bar* enthusiasm but spare little thought the men and women who make a significant contribution to government or public service. Of the 150 or so barristers in That is not to say that other nations do not celebrate sporting South Australia, John Emerson or cultural achievements, but in Europe, Canada and America hopes to interview around 100 there is also a certain ethos reserved for great political and legal of them to gain the broadest figures that arguably adds much to the national life. possible perspective for the book The oddity of it is that lack of interest is no explanation. he is writing on the history of the Biographies of the significant politicians or judges of the United South Australian Independent Bar. States of America and Great Britain frequently grace Australian A chance meeting with Justice bookshelves, and names like Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr and Lord John Emerson Tom Gray in 2001 led to discussion Denning have resonance all over the globe. Such is the interest about the history of the Chief in these figures that they have developed their own legend Justices of South Australia, which John was subsequently beyond the community of lawyers. As I write I can be confident commissioned to write (through the John Bray Law that historians somewhere are industriously re-visiting earlier Chapter of the Alumni Association of the University of works and revising, re-interpreting and re-writing the lives and Adelaide).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Sir Harry Gibbs a Paper Presented
    Sir Harry Gibbs A paper presented to the Selden Society, Brisbane on 17 March 2016 by D.F. Jackson AM, QC1 Introduction I thank the Selden Society for inviting me to deliver this paper in relation to the life of Sir Harry Gibbs, who was born on 7 February 1917 and died on 25 June 2005. I had the privilege to be his Associate in 1963 and 1964 when he was a Judge of the Supreme Court of Queensland, I appeared before him after that on a number of occasions when he was a Judge of that Court, and on many occasions I appeared before courts of which he was a member in the High Court, sometimes in cases which were acutely political. After his retirement we kept in contact and I was pleased that he sent a message asking me to visit him in hospital a few days before his death. He was then a very sick man. We both knew he was dying. And we uttered the trivialities and banalities so common on such occasions. Other material May I mention first some of the places where other material concerning him is to be found. The fullest is a biography of Sir Harry by Joan Priest, Without Fear or Favour. It was published in 1995 sponsored by the University of Queensland Law Graduates Association. It contains an Appendix by the Hon Peter Connolly CBE, QC a former Judge of the Supreme Court of Queensland, dealing with Sir Harry’s time on the High Court, and thereafter. In 2003 the Supreme Court Library published Queensland Judges on the High Court, edited by Michael White QC and Adam Rahemtula .
    [Show full text]
  • Tort Law Reform in Australia
    Tort Law Reform in Australia This is the text ofa lecture delivered by the Honourable JJ Spigelman, AC Chief Justice OfNew South Wales, to the Anglo-Australian Lawyers Society & the British Insurance Law Association at Lincoln's Inn, London on 16 June 2004 The District Court of New South Wales has jurisdiction to hear motor accident claims and work injury damages claims irrespective of the amount claimed and all other common law claims where the amount claimed does not exceed about £350,000. Its civil jurisdiction is, to a substantial degree, a personal injury jurisdiction. Filings in the District Court have fallen from about 20,000 in calendar year 2001, to 13,000 in 2002 and to 8,000 in 2003. The reduced rate of filings is continuing this year. It is reasonably clear that something dramatic has happened to civil litigation in New South Wales. Similar effects are seen in other states. What these figures reveal is a dramatic change in the practical operation of the law of negligence in Australia over a few years. This is the result of two factors. First, there has been a substantial shift in judicial attitudes at an appellate level, led by the High Court of Australia. Secondly, there have been major changes to the law of negligence implemented by statute. My purpose this evening is to outline in general terms the nature of the changes to the law that have had such dramatic effects in so short a period of time. It is first, however, necessary to provide a broader context. One lesson we must all learn from history is never to underestimate the ingenuity of the legal profession when faced with such dramatic changes to its customary practices.
    [Show full text]
  • The High Court of Australia: a Personal Impression of Its First 100 Years
    —M.U.L.R— Mason— Title of Article — printed 14/12/03 at 13:17 — page 864 of 25 THE HIGH COURT OF AUSTRALIA: A PERSONAL IMPRESSION OF ITS FIRST 100 YEARS ∗ THE HON SIR ANTHONY MASON AC KBE [This article records my impressions of the High Court, its jurisprudence and the Justices up to the time when I became Chief Justice in 1987. For obvious reasons it would be invidious for me to record my impressions of the Court from that time onwards. The article reviews the work of the Court and endeavours to convey a picture of the contribution and personality of some of the individual Justices. The article concludes with the statement that the Court has achieved the high objectives of which Alfred Deakin spoke in his second reading speech on the introduction of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth). The Court has established its reputation as one of the world’s leading courts of final appeal and has fulfilled its role alongside the Parliament and the executive in our constitutional framework.] CONTENTS I Introduction.............................................................................................................864 II In the Beginning......................................................................................................865 III The Early High Court..............................................................................................866 IV Conflict with the Executive ....................................................................................867 V Conflict with the Privy Council ..............................................................................868
    [Show full text]